ECCU Center · at Tarleton St
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | TAR | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects TAR 81–65 · win probability TAR 92%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 145.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: TAR has more of the edges
ALCN 1, TAR 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
ALCN offense vs TAR defense
Offense 350th of 366 against a defense 186th, on the model’s ratings
TAR offense vs ALCN defense
Offense 200th of 366 against a defense 354th, on the model’s ratings
Three-pointers
ALCN hits 33.3% and allows 33.0%; TAR hits 32.5% and allows 34.9%. Threes are 33.7% and 24.2% of their shots
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: ALCN 26.9%, TAR 31.5%. Defensive: ALCN 64.5%, TAR 64.9%
Free throws
Free throw rate: ALCN 31.8, TAR 41.9. Allowed: ALCN 39.4, TAR 47.7
Context
Schedule so far
ALCN has played the 266th-hardest schedule, TAR the 212th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Home court
TAR at home. This season: TAR 0-0 at home, ALCN 0-0 away
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: ALCN 19.6%, TAR 19.9%. Forced: ALCN 18.1%, TAR 23.5%
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: ALCN plays 69.7 a game (138th fastest), TAR 71.2 (64th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: ALCN 47.7 and allows 55.0; TAR 48.3 and allows 53.6
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: ALCN 11%, TAR 23%. Transfers in: ALCN 5, TAR 7. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | TAR -16.3 | — |
| Total | — | 145.8 | — |
| Projected score | — | ALCN 64.8 · TAR 81.1 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | TAR -9.6 | — |
| 1H total | 68.2 | — |
| 1H projected score | ALCN 29.3 · TAR 38.9 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% | |
| 3-7 30% | 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Alcorn St
32 games played
Straight up
9-23
28% wins
Against the spread
18-14
56% covers · avg −0.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-17
47% overs · avg −0.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | @ | L 76-108 | +27.5 | L −4.5 | 156.5 | O 184 |
| Nov 6 | @ | L 70-76 | +18.5 | W +12.5 | 141.5 | O 146 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 50-95 | +31.5 | L −13.5 | 152.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 64-84 | +29.5 | W +9.5 | 146.5 | O 148 |
| Nov 13 | @ | L 64-72 | +6.5 | L −1.5 | 154.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 81-107 | +32.5 | W +6.5 | 155.5 | O 188 |
| Nov 23 | @ | L 53-72 | +31.5 | W +12.5 | 160.5 | U 125 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 81-74 | +12.5 | W +19.5 | 152.5 | O 155 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 58-83 | +16.5 | L −8.5 | 137.5 | O 141 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 68-132 | +42.5 | L −21.5 | 151.5 | O 200 |
| Dec 19 | @ | L 56-113 | +35.5 | L −21.5 | 160.5 | O 169 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 43-79 | +28.5 | L −7.5 | 148.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 86-89 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 145.5 | O 175 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 64-62 | +9.5 | W +11.5 | 140.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 12 | @ | L 66-81 | +9.5 | L −5.5 | 151.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 71-72 | +1.5 | W +0.5 | 146.5 | U 143 |
| Jan 19 | vs | W 76-75 | +2.5 | W +3.5 | 152.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 58-66 | +8.5 | W +0.5 | 141.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 26 | @ | L 73-82 | +13.5 | W +4.5 | 147.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 78-73 | +7.5 | W +12.5 | 147.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 2 | vs | L 50-74 | +5.5 | L −18.5 | 143.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 77-84 | +7.5 | W +0.5 | 145.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 9 | @ | W 74-66 | -5.5 | W +2.5 | 140.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 57-55 | +8.5 | W +10.5 | 144.5 | U 112 |
| Feb 16 | vs | L 78-86 | +2.5 | L −5.5 | 137.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 83-65 | +1.5 | W +19.5 | 149.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 87-92 | +5.5 | W +0.5 | 145.5 | O 179 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 51-72 | +4.5 | L −16.5 | 150.5 | U 123 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 67-64 | -9.5 | L −6.5 | 139.5 | U 131 |
| Mar 5 | vs | L 48-83 | +1.5 | L −33.5 | 145.5 | U 131 |
| Mar 9 | vs | W 77-65 | +7.5 | W +19.5 | 141.5 | O 142 |
| Mar 10 | vs | L 56-65 | +6.5 | L −2.5 | 142.5 | U 121 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
@
FSU
L 76-108
−4.5
6
@
USA
L 70-76
+12.5
8
@
MINN
L 50-95
−13.5
11
@
MD
L 64-84
+9.5
13
@
HOW
L 64-72
−1.5
18
@
LSU
L 81-107
+6.5
23
@
OU
L 53-72
+12.5
28
vs
INST
W 81-74
+19.5
29
@
LT
L 58-83
−8.5
3
@
ISU
L 68-132
−21.5
19
@
BAY
L 56-113
−21.5
29
@
MISS
L 43-79
−7.5
3
@
JKST
L 86-89
+2.5
10
@
AAMU
W 64-62
+11.5
12
@
ALST
L 66-81
−5.5
17
vs
TXSO
L 71-72
+0.5
19
vs
PV
W 76-75
+3.5
24
@
FAMU
L 58-66
+0.5
26
@
BCU
L 73-82
+4.5
31
vs
SOU
W 78-73
+12.5
2
vs
GRAM
L 50-74
−18.5
7
@
UAPB
L 77-84
+0.5
9
@
MVSU
W 74-66
+2.5
14
vs
BCU
W 57-55
+10.5
16
vs
FAMU
L 78-86
−5.5
21
vs
JKST
W 83-65
+19.5
26
@
TXSO
L 87-92
+0.5
28
@
PV
L 51-72
−16.5
3
vs
MVSU
W 67-64
−6.5
5
vs
UAPB
L 48-83
−33.5
9
vs
ALST
W 77-65
+19.5
10
vs
PV
L 56-65
−2.5
covered 18didn’t cover 14avg −0.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
@
FSU
L 76-108
+27.5
6
@
USA
L 70-76
+4.5
8
@
MINN
L 50-95
−7.5
11
@
MD
L 64-84
+1.5
13
@
HOW
L 64-72
−18.5
18
@
LSU
L 81-107
+32.5
23
@
OU
L 53-72
−35.5
28
vs
INST
W 81-74
+2.5
29
@
LT
L 58-83
+3.5
3
@
ISU
L 68-132
+48.5
19
@
BAY
L 56-113
+8.5
29
@
MISS
L 43-79
−26.5
3
@
JKST
L 86-89
+29.5
10
@
AAMU
W 64-62
−14.5
12
@
ALST
L 66-81
−4.5
17
vs
TXSO
L 71-72
−3.5
19
vs
PV
W 76-75
−1.5
24
@
FAMU
L 58-66
−17.5
26
@
BCU
L 73-82
+7.5
31
vs
SOU
W 78-73
+3.5
2
vs
GRAM
L 50-74
−19.5
7
@
UAPB
L 77-84
+15.5
9
@
MVSU
W 74-66
−0.5
14
vs
BCU
W 57-55
−32.5
16
vs
FAMU
L 78-86
+26.5
21
vs
JKST
W 83-65
−1.5
26
@
TXSO
L 87-92
+33.5
28
@
PV
L 51-72
−27.5
3
vs
MVSU
W 67-64
−8.5
5
vs
UAPB
L 48-83
−14.5
9
vs
ALST
W 77-65
+0.5
10
vs
PV
L 56-65
−21.5
over 15under 17avg −0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Tarleton St
28 games played
Straight up
10-18
36% wins
Against the spread
14-14
50% covers · avg +0.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-13
54% overs · avg +4.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 76-96 | +21.5 | W +1.5 | 144.5 | O 172 |
| Nov 5 | @ | L 60-96 | +15.5 | L −20.5 | 148.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 85-77 | -3.5 | W +4.5 | 142.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 76-62 | -4.5 | W +9.5 | 142.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 81-94 | +23.5 | W +10.5 | 149.5 | O 175 |
| Nov 20 | @ | W 90-74 | +4.5 | W +20.5 | 146.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 1 | @ | L 58-76 | +24.5 | W +6.5 | 142.5 | U 134 |
| Dec 16 | @ | W 88-64 | -17.5 | W +6.5 | 142.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 19 | vs | W 78-54 | -14.5 | W +9.5 | 145.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 29 | @ | W 69-63 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 136.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 1 | vs | L 85-91 | +5.5 | L −0.5 | 144.5 | O 176 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 81-76 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 147.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 8 | vs | L 80-84 | -4.5 | L −8.5 | 140.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 105-106 | -3.5 | L −4.5 | 150.5 | O 211 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 71-75 | +3.5 | L −0.5 | 150.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 64-71 | +3.5 | L −3.5 | 142.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 29 | vs | L 55-83 | +6.5 | L −21.5 | 154.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 59-65 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 149.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 55-56 | +10.5 | W +9.5 | 138.5 | U 111 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 62-59 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 149.5 | U 121 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 59-73 | +3.5 | L −10.5 | 134.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 16 | vs | W 65-62 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 134.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 78-74 | -4.5 | L −0.5 | 144.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 72-80 | -1.5 | L −9.5 | 140.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 72-79 | +17.5 | W +10.5 | 141.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 67-82 | +8.5 | L −6.5 | 139.5 | O 149 |
| Mar 5 | vs | L 60-65 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 136.5 | U 125 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 78-84 | +1.5 | L −4.5 | 134.5 | O 162 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
SMU
L 76-96
+1.5
5
@
LSU
L 60-96
−20.5
8
vs
AMCC
W 85-77
+4.5
11
vs
MRMK
W 76-62
+9.5
14
@
BAY
L 81-94
+10.5
20
@
RICE
W 90-74
+20.5
1
@
CIN
L 58-76
+6.5
16
@
MVSU
W 88-64
+6.5
19
vs
FAMU
W 78-54
+9.5
29
@
UTA
W 69-63
+8.5
1
vs
UVU
L 85-91
−0.5
3
vs
CBU
W 81-76
+3.5
8
vs
ACU
L 80-84
−8.5
15
@
SUU
L 105-106
−4.5
17
@
UTU
L 71-75
−0.5
21
@
UTA
L 64-71
−3.5
29
vs
UVU
L 55-83
−21.5
31
vs
UTU
L 59-65
−7.5
5
@
CBU
L 55-56
+9.5
7
@
SUU
W 62-59
+1.5
14
@
ACU
L 59-73
−10.5
16
vs
ACU
W 65-62
+4.5
19
vs
SUU
W 78-74
−0.5
21
vs
UTU
L 72-80
−9.5
26
@
UVU
L 72-79
+10.5
28
@
CBU
L 67-82
−6.5
5
vs
UTA
L 60-65
−6.5
11
vs
ACU
L 78-84
−4.5
covered 14didn’t cover 14avg +0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
SMU
L 76-96
+27.5
5
@
LSU
L 60-96
+7.5
8
vs
AMCC
W 85-77
+19.5
11
vs
MRMK
W 76-62
−4.5
14
@
BAY
L 81-94
+25.5
20
@
RICE
W 90-74
+17.5
1
@
CIN
L 58-76
−8.5
16
@
MVSU
W 88-64
+9.5
19
vs
FAMU
W 78-54
−13.5
29
@
UTA
W 69-63
−4.5
1
vs
UVU
L 85-91
+31.5
3
vs
CBU
W 81-76
+9.5
8
vs
ACU
L 80-84
+23.5
15
@
SUU
L 105-106
+60.5
17
@
UTU
L 71-75
−4.5
21
@
UTA
L 64-71
−7.5
29
vs
UVU
L 55-83
−16.5
31
vs
UTU
L 59-65
−25.5
5
@
CBU
L 55-56
−27.5
7
@
SUU
W 62-59
−28.5
14
@
ACU
L 59-73
−2.5
16
vs
ACU
W 65-62
−7.5
19
vs
SUU
W 78-74
+7.5
21
vs
UTU
L 72-80
+11.5
26
@
UVU
L 72-79
+9.5
28
@
CBU
L 67-82
+9.5
5
vs
UTA
L 60-65
−11.5
11
vs
ACU
L 78-84
+27.5
over 15under 13avg +4.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: Alcorn St 1, Tarleton St 1, even 3
Alcorn StBetterTarleton St
G T. Thomas9 pts · 3 reb · 1 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G C. Blackwell TR10.7 pts · 2.8 reb · 2.9 ast
Score 52
G J. Felton TR1.7 pts · 1.3 reb · 0.3 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G F. Emmou TR7.3 pts · 1.8 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 36
G B. Thomas TR3 pts · 0.8 reb · 0.3 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G L. Kelly5.2 pts · 2.8 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 41
F M. Taylor TR3.3 pts · 2 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 4
→TARBig
G T. Cope TR8.3 pts · 2.9 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 47
C C. Richardson TR6.5 pts · 2.4 reb · 0 ast
Score 45
←ALCNSmall
F I. Harrell TR7.8 pts · 3.7 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 23
Alcorn StBetterTarleton St
ALCN offense350th of 366 · -12.5
→TARBig
TAR defense186th of 366 · -4.3
ALCN defense354th of 366 · -9.9
→TARBig
TAR offense200th of 366 · -6.3
Backcourt-1.9 · 3 players
←ALCNSmall
Backcourt-3.3 · 4 players
Frontcourt-1.8 · 2 players
=Even
Frontcourt-1.8 · 1 player
Bench-0.6 · 1 player
=Even
Bench-0.5 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestALCN betterTAR betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
T. Thomas22 minJ. Felton14 min · TRB. Thomas7 min · TRS. SunderlandNewJ. PowellNewJ. CraineNew
Forwards
M. Taylor14 min · TRJ. Walker5 min · TRB. CannonNewN. ThomasNew
Centers
C. Richardson15 min · TRA. TokpahNew
Guards
C. Blackwell31 min · TRF. Emmou23 min · TRL. Kelly21 minT. Cope21 min · TRK. Douglas16 minJ. Martinez2 min
Forwards
I. Harrell26 min · TRJ. Daniel19 min · TRJ. Hayes13 min · TRJ. Mani12 min · TRM. Vrabel7 minE. CarterNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 66.9 #335 | Points per game | 72.5 #231 |
| 0.96 #352 | Points per possession | 1.01 #309 |
| 69.7 #138 | Pace (possessions) | 71.2 #64 |
| Shooting | ||
| 47.7 #320 | Effective FG% | 48.3 #306 |
| 33.3 #209 | 3-point % | 32.5 #256 |
| 33.7 #303 | 3-point attempt rate | 24.2 #365 |
| 31.8 #259 | Free throw rate | 41.9 #33 |
| Possessions | ||
| 19.6 #340 | Turnover rate | 19.9 #348 |
| 26.9 #297 | Offensive rebound rate | 31.5 #141 |
| 11.1 #333 | Assists per game | 10.5 #349 |
| Defense | ||
| 80.2 #322 | Points allowed | 75.8 #211 |
| 1.15 #324 | Points allowed per possession | 1.07 #130 |
| 55.0 #330 | Opponent effective FG% | 53.6 #285 |
| 33.0 #120 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.9 #244 |
| 18.1 #92 | Turnovers forced | 23.5 #2 |
| 64.5 #347 | Defensive rebound rate | 64.9 #340 |
| 7.7 #63 | Steals per game | 9.7 #3 |
| 3.4 #162 | Blocks per game | 3.1 #206 |
Alcorn St
9-23 in 2025-26 overall · 8-12 in conference · Southwestern Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Prairie View56–65
- Wvs Alabama St77–65
- Lvs AR-Pine Bluff48–83
- Wvs Miss Valley St67–64
- L@ Prairie View51–72
A week or more of rest.
Tarleton St
10-18 in 2025-26 overall · 5-14 in conference · United Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Abilene Chrstn78–84
- Lvs UT Arlington60–65
- L@ CA Baptist67–82
- L@ Utah Valley72–79
- Lvs Utah Tech72–80
A week or more of rest.