Thomas Assembly Center · at Louisiana Tech
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | LT | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects LT 77–64 · win probability LT 87%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 141.1
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: LT has more of the edges
ALCN 1, LT 6 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: ALCN 26.9%, LT 36.4%. Defensive: ALCN 64.5%, LT 68.4%
ALCN offense vs LT defense
Offense 350th of 366 against a defense 184th, on the model’s ratings
Shooting
Effective FG%: ALCN 47.7 and allows 55.0; LT 47.4 and allows 48.7
Three-pointers
ALCN hits 33.3% and allows 33.0%; LT hits 28.6% and allows 33.9%. Threes are 33.7% and 33.4% of their shots
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: ALCN plays 69.7 a game (138th fastest), LT 65.5 (332nd). Faster games mean more points
Context
Schedule so far
ALCN has played the 266th-hardest schedule, LT the 197th. A record against a soft schedule means less
LT offense vs ALCN defense
Offense 302nd of 366 against a defense 354th, on the model’s ratings
Home court
LT at home. This season: LT 0-0 at home, ALCN 0-0 away
Free throws
Free throw rate: ALCN 31.8, LT 33.1. Allowed: ALCN 39.4, LT 36.3
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: ALCN 19.6%, LT 18.2%. Forced: ALCN 18.1%, LT 17.9%
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: ALCN 11%, LT 11%. Transfers in: ALCN 5, LT 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | LT -13.1 | — |
| Total | — | 141.1 | — |
| Projected score | — | ALCN 64 · LT 77.1 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | LT -7.6 | — |
| 1H total | 66.0 | — |
| 1H projected score | ALCN 29.2 · LT 36.8 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% | |
| 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
ALCN 0–1 LTLT leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · ALCN 0-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2025-26 | ALCN 58 @ LT 83 | LT -16.5 | LT W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Alcorn St
32 games played
Straight up
9-23
28% wins
Against the spread
18-14
56% covers · avg −0.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-17
47% overs · avg −0.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | @ | L 76-108 | +27.5 | L −4.5 | 156.5 | O 184 |
| Nov 6 | @ | L 70-76 | +18.5 | W +12.5 | 141.5 | O 146 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 50-95 | +31.5 | L −13.5 | 152.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 64-84 | +29.5 | W +9.5 | 146.5 | O 148 |
| Nov 13 | @ | L 64-72 | +6.5 | L −1.5 | 154.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 81-107 | +32.5 | W +6.5 | 155.5 | O 188 |
| Nov 23 | @ | L 53-72 | +31.5 | W +12.5 | 160.5 | U 125 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 81-74 | +12.5 | W +19.5 | 152.5 | O 155 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 58-83 | +16.5 | L −8.5 | 137.5 | O 141 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 68-132 | +42.5 | L −21.5 | 151.5 | O 200 |
| Dec 19 | @ | L 56-113 | +35.5 | L −21.5 | 160.5 | O 169 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 43-79 | +28.5 | L −7.5 | 148.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 86-89 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 145.5 | O 175 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 64-62 | +9.5 | W +11.5 | 140.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 12 | @ | L 66-81 | +9.5 | L −5.5 | 151.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 71-72 | +1.5 | W +0.5 | 146.5 | U 143 |
| Jan 19 | vs | W 76-75 | +2.5 | W +3.5 | 152.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 58-66 | +8.5 | W +0.5 | 141.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 26 | @ | L 73-82 | +13.5 | W +4.5 | 147.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 78-73 | +7.5 | W +12.5 | 147.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 2 | vs | L 50-74 | +5.5 | L −18.5 | 143.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 77-84 | +7.5 | W +0.5 | 145.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 9 | @ | W 74-66 | -5.5 | W +2.5 | 140.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 57-55 | +8.5 | W +10.5 | 144.5 | U 112 |
| Feb 16 | vs | L 78-86 | +2.5 | L −5.5 | 137.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 83-65 | +1.5 | W +19.5 | 149.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 87-92 | +5.5 | W +0.5 | 145.5 | O 179 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 51-72 | +4.5 | L −16.5 | 150.5 | U 123 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 67-64 | -9.5 | L −6.5 | 139.5 | U 131 |
| Mar 5 | vs | L 48-83 | +1.5 | L −33.5 | 145.5 | U 131 |
| Mar 9 | vs | W 77-65 | +7.5 | W +19.5 | 141.5 | O 142 |
| Mar 10 | vs | L 56-65 | +6.5 | L −2.5 | 142.5 | U 121 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
@
FSU
L 76-108
−4.5
6
@
USA
L 70-76
+12.5
8
@
MINN
L 50-95
−13.5
11
@
MD
L 64-84
+9.5
13
@
HOW
L 64-72
−1.5
18
@
LSU
L 81-107
+6.5
23
@
OU
L 53-72
+12.5
28
vs
INST
W 81-74
+19.5
29
@
LT
L 58-83
−8.5
3
@
ISU
L 68-132
−21.5
19
@
BAY
L 56-113
−21.5
29
@
MISS
L 43-79
−7.5
3
@
JKST
L 86-89
+2.5
10
@
AAMU
W 64-62
+11.5
12
@
ALST
L 66-81
−5.5
17
vs
TXSO
L 71-72
+0.5
19
vs
PV
W 76-75
+3.5
24
@
FAMU
L 58-66
+0.5
26
@
BCU
L 73-82
+4.5
31
vs
SOU
W 78-73
+12.5
2
vs
GRAM
L 50-74
−18.5
7
@
UAPB
L 77-84
+0.5
9
@
MVSU
W 74-66
+2.5
14
vs
BCU
W 57-55
+10.5
16
vs
FAMU
L 78-86
−5.5
21
vs
JKST
W 83-65
+19.5
26
@
TXSO
L 87-92
+0.5
28
@
PV
L 51-72
−16.5
3
vs
MVSU
W 67-64
−6.5
5
vs
UAPB
L 48-83
−33.5
9
vs
ALST
W 77-65
+19.5
10
vs
PV
L 56-65
−2.5
covered 18didn’t cover 14avg −0.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
@
FSU
L 76-108
+27.5
6
@
USA
L 70-76
+4.5
8
@
MINN
L 50-95
−7.5
11
@
MD
L 64-84
+1.5
13
@
HOW
L 64-72
−18.5
18
@
LSU
L 81-107
+32.5
23
@
OU
L 53-72
−35.5
28
vs
INST
W 81-74
+2.5
29
@
LT
L 58-83
+3.5
3
@
ISU
L 68-132
+48.5
19
@
BAY
L 56-113
+8.5
29
@
MISS
L 43-79
−26.5
3
@
JKST
L 86-89
+29.5
10
@
AAMU
W 64-62
−14.5
12
@
ALST
L 66-81
−4.5
17
vs
TXSO
L 71-72
−3.5
19
vs
PV
W 76-75
−1.5
24
@
FAMU
L 58-66
−17.5
26
@
BCU
L 73-82
+7.5
31
vs
SOU
W 78-73
+3.5
2
vs
GRAM
L 50-74
−19.5
7
@
UAPB
L 77-84
+15.5
9
@
MVSU
W 74-66
−0.5
14
vs
BCU
W 57-55
−32.5
16
vs
FAMU
L 78-86
+26.5
21
vs
JKST
W 83-65
−1.5
26
@
TXSO
L 87-92
+33.5
28
@
PV
L 51-72
−27.5
3
vs
MVSU
W 67-64
−8.5
5
vs
UAPB
L 48-83
−14.5
9
vs
ALST
W 77-65
+0.5
10
vs
PV
L 56-65
−21.5
over 15under 17avg −0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Louisiana Tech
31 games played
Straight up
17-14
55% wins
Against the spread
17-14
55% covers · avg +1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-15
52% overs · avg −2.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | @ | L 50-77 | +9.5 | L −17.5 | 136.5 | U 127 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 68-51 | -8.5 | W +8.5 | 146.5 | U 119 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 51-60 | +3.5 | L −5.5 | 147.5 | U 111 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 75-73 | -2.5 | L −0.5 | 141.5 | O 148 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 83-58 | -16.5 | W +8.5 | 137.5 | O 141 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 69-77 | +1.5 | L −6.5 | 145.5 | O 146 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 65-44 | -9.5 | W +11.5 | 126.5 | U 109 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 53-61 | +4.5 | L −3.5 | 140.5 | U 114 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 75-63 | -2.5 | W +9.5 | 130.5 | O 138 |
| Jan 2 | @ | L 51-88 | +6.5 | L −30.5 | 134.5 | O 139 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 61-66 | +9.5 | W +4.5 | 145.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 8 | vs | L 56-72 | +4.5 | L −11.5 | 135.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 70-68 | -6.5 | L −4.5 | 123.5 | O 138 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 59-58 | +3.5 | W +4.5 | 131.5 | U 117 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 60-64 | +4.5 | W +0.5 | 127.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 23 | vs | W 82-76 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 144.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 69-59 | +2.5 | W +12.5 | 130.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 67-83 | +7.5 | L −8.5 | 141.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 63-72 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 135.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 87-78 | +3.5 | W +12.5 | 143.5 | O 165 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 79-78 | +3.5 | W +4.5 | 136.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 64-77 | +3.5 | L −9.5 | 146.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 77-71 | -2.5 | W +3.5 | 132.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 55-58 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 147.5 | U 113 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 72-70 | -2.5 | L −0.5 | 138.5 | O 142 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 76-84 | -2.5 | L −10.5 | 145.5 | O 160 |
| Mar 5 | @ | W 76-71 | +8.5 | W +13.5 | 136.5 | O 147 |
| Mar 7 | @ | W 81-38 | -2.5 | W +40.5 | 132.5 | U 119 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 80-69 | +1.5 | W +12.5 | 134.5 | O 149 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 69-66 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 134.5 | O 135 |
| Mar 14 | vs | L 60-71 | +1.5 | L −9.5 | 142.5 | U 131 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
@
NEV
L 50-77
−17.5
15
vs
JKST
W 68-51
+8.5
19
@
INST
L 51-60
−5.5
26
vs
INST
W 75-73
−0.5
29
vs
ALCN
W 83-58
+8.5
3
@
GASO
L 69-77
−6.5
13
vs
UL
W 65-44
+11.5
17
@
TULN
L 53-61
−3.5
29
vs
UTEP
W 75-63
+9.5
2
@
MTSU
L 51-88
−30.5
4
@
WKU
L 61-66
+4.5
8
vs
LIB
L 56-72
−11.5
10
vs
DEL
W 70-68
−4.5
14
vs
MTSU
W 59-58
+4.5
17
@
JXST
L 60-64
+0.5
23
vs
KENN
W 82-76
+7.5
28
@
UTEP
W 69-59
+12.5
31
@
SHSU
L 67-83
−8.5
4
vs
NMSU
L 63-72
−10.5
7
vs
SHSU
W 87-78
+12.5
12
@
MOST
W 79-78
+4.5
14
@
FIU
L 64-77
−9.5
18
vs
JXST
W 77-71
+3.5
21
@
KENN
L 55-58
+2.5
26
vs
MOST
W 72-70
−0.5
28
vs
FIU
L 76-84
−10.5
5
@
LIB
W 76-71
+13.5
7
@
DEL
W 81-38
+40.5
12
vs
MTSU
W 80-69
+12.5
13
vs
MOST
W 69-66
+4.5
14
vs
KENN
L 60-71
−9.5
covered 17didn’t cover 14avg +1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
@
NEV
L 50-77
−9.5
15
vs
JKST
W 68-51
−27.5
19
@
INST
L 51-60
−36.5
26
vs
INST
W 75-73
+6.5
29
vs
ALCN
W 83-58
+3.5
3
@
GASO
L 69-77
+0.5
13
vs
UL
W 65-44
−17.5
17
@
TULN
L 53-61
−26.5
29
vs
UTEP
W 75-63
+7.5
2
@
MTSU
L 51-88
+4.5
4
@
WKU
L 61-66
−18.5
8
vs
LIB
L 56-72
−7.5
10
vs
DEL
W 70-68
+14.5
14
vs
MTSU
W 59-58
−14.5
17
@
JXST
L 60-64
−3.5
23
vs
KENN
W 82-76
+13.5
28
@
UTEP
W 69-59
−2.5
31
@
SHSU
L 67-83
+8.5
4
vs
NMSU
L 63-72
−0.5
7
vs
SHSU
W 87-78
+21.5
12
@
MOST
W 79-78
+20.5
14
@
FIU
L 64-77
−5.5
18
vs
JXST
W 77-71
+15.5
21
@
KENN
L 55-58
−34.5
26
vs
MOST
W 72-70
+3.5
28
vs
FIU
L 76-84
+14.5
5
@
LIB
W 76-71
+10.5
7
@
DEL
W 81-38
−13.5
12
vs
MTSU
W 80-69
+14.5
13
vs
MOST
W 69-66
+0.5
14
vs
KENN
L 60-71
−11.5
over 16under 15avg −2.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: Alcorn St 0, Louisiana Tech 0, even 5
Alcorn StBetterLouisiana Tech
G T. Thomas9 pts · 3 reb · 1 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G J. Fenner5.3 pts · 2.9 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 27
G J. Felton TR1.7 pts · 1.3 reb · 0.3 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G D. Bates NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
G B. Thomas TR3 pts · 0.8 reb · 0.3 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G K. Tilley NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
F M. Taylor TR3.3 pts · 2 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 4
=No call
F E. Blackmon NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
C C. Richardson TR6.5 pts · 2.4 reb · 0 ast
Score 45
=No call
F L. Rowe NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
Alcorn StBetterLouisiana Tech
ALCN offense350th of 366 · -12.5
→LTBig
LT defense184th of 366 · -4.3
ALCN defense354th of 366 · -9.9
=Even
LT offense302nd of 366 · -9.4
Backcourt-1.9 · 3 players
=Even
Backcourt-1.6 · 3 players
Frontcourt-1.8 · 2 players
=No call
FrontcourtNo numbers yet
Bench-0.6 · 1 player
=No call
BenchNo numbers yet
Score, worst to bestALCN betterLT betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
T. Thomas22 minJ. Felton14 min · TRB. Thomas7 min · TRS. SunderlandNewJ. PowellNewJ. CraineNew
Forwards
M. Taylor14 min · TRJ. Walker5 min · TRB. CannonNewN. ThomasNew
Centers
C. Richardson15 min · TRA. TokpahNew
Guards
J. Fenner22 minD. BatesNewK. TilleyNewJ. TylerNewJ. SandersonNewA. BoydNew
Forwards
E. BlackmonNewL. RoweNewB. WengerNewI. EmelifeNewI. FrancisNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 66.9 #335 | Points per game | 67.8 #318 |
| 0.96 #352 | Points per possession | 1.03 #284 |
| 69.7 #138 | Pace (possessions) | 65.5 #332 |
| Shooting | ||
| 47.7 #320 | Effective FG% | 47.4 #329 |
| 33.3 #209 | 3-point % | 28.6 #359 |
| 33.7 #303 | 3-point attempt rate | 33.4 #310 |
| 31.8 #259 | Free throw rate | 33.1 #234 |
| Possessions | ||
| 19.6 #340 | Turnover rate | 18.2 #283 |
| 26.9 #297 | Offensive rebound rate | 36.4 #21 |
| 11.1 #333 | Assists per game | 11.9 #297 |
| Defense | ||
| 80.2 #322 | Points allowed | 67.8 #30 |
| 1.15 #324 | Points allowed per possession | 1.04 #75 |
| 55.0 #330 | Opponent effective FG% | 48.7 #51 |
| 33.0 #120 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.9 #178 |
| 18.1 #92 | Turnovers forced | 17.9 #102 |
| 64.5 #347 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.4 #232 |
| 7.7 #63 | Steals per game | 6.8 #144 |
| 3.4 #162 | Blocks per game | 4.6 #31 |
Alcorn St
9-23 in 2025-26 overall · 8-12 in conference · Southwestern Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Prairie View56–65
- Wvs Alabama St77–65
- Lvs AR-Pine Bluff48–83
- Wvs Miss Valley St67–64
- L@ Prairie View51–72
A week or more of rest.
Louisiana Tech
17-14 in 2025-26 overall · 13-10 in conference · Sun Belt Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Kennesaw St60–71
- Wvs Missouri St69–66
- Wvs MTSU80–69
- W@ Delaware81–38
- W@ Liberty76–71
A week or more of rest.