Thomas Assembly Center · Neutral site
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | TXST | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects TXST 84–63 · win probability TXST 96%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 147.1
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: TXST has more of the edges
ALCN 1, TXST 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
TXST offense vs ALCN defense
Offense 105th of 366 against a defense 354th, on the model’s ratings
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: ALCN 26.9%, TXST 33.9%. Defensive: ALCN 64.5%, TXST 71.6%
ALCN offense vs TXST defense
Offense 350th of 366 against a defense 112th, on the model’s ratings
Three-pointers
ALCN hits 33.3% and allows 33.0%; TXST hits 32.2% and allows 35.7%. Threes are 33.7% and 24.6% of their shots
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: ALCN 11%, TXST 69%. Transfers in: ALCN 5, TXST 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Shooting
Effective FG%: ALCN 47.7 and allows 55.0; TXST 50.0 and allows 52.0
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: ALCN plays 69.7 a game (138th fastest), TXST 68.2 (223rd). Faster games mean more points
Context
Schedule so far
ALCN has played the 266th-hardest schedule, TXST the 298th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: ALCN 31.8, TXST 34.0. Allowed: ALCN 39.4, TXST 39.0
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: ALCN 19.6%, TXST 18.7%. Forced: ALCN 18.1%, TXST 18.5%
Context
Neutral floor
No home court: the model takes it out of the line
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | TXST -20.5 | — |
| Total | — | 147.1 | — |
| Projected score | — | ALCN 63.3 · TXST 83.8 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | TXST -12.0 | — |
| 1H total | 68.8 | — |
| 1H projected score | ALCN 28.4 · TXST 40.4 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% | |
| 8-2 80% | 7-3 70% | 4-6 40% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Alcorn St
32 games played
Straight up
9-23
28% wins
Against the spread
18-14
56% covers · avg −0.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-17
47% overs · avg −0.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | @ | L 76-108 | +27.5 | L −4.5 | 156.5 | O 184 |
| Nov 6 | @ | L 70-76 | +18.5 | W +12.5 | 141.5 | O 146 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 50-95 | +31.5 | L −13.5 | 152.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 64-84 | +29.5 | W +9.5 | 146.5 | O 148 |
| Nov 13 | @ | L 64-72 | +6.5 | L −1.5 | 154.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 81-107 | +32.5 | W +6.5 | 155.5 | O 188 |
| Nov 23 | @ | L 53-72 | +31.5 | W +12.5 | 160.5 | U 125 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 81-74 | +12.5 | W +19.5 | 152.5 | O 155 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 58-83 | +16.5 | L −8.5 | 137.5 | O 141 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 68-132 | +42.5 | L −21.5 | 151.5 | O 200 |
| Dec 19 | @ | L 56-113 | +35.5 | L −21.5 | 160.5 | O 169 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 43-79 | +28.5 | L −7.5 | 148.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 86-89 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 145.5 | O 175 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 64-62 | +9.5 | W +11.5 | 140.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 12 | @ | L 66-81 | +9.5 | L −5.5 | 151.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 71-72 | +1.5 | W +0.5 | 146.5 | U 143 |
| Jan 19 | vs | W 76-75 | +2.5 | W +3.5 | 152.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 58-66 | +8.5 | W +0.5 | 141.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 26 | @ | L 73-82 | +13.5 | W +4.5 | 147.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 78-73 | +7.5 | W +12.5 | 147.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 2 | vs | L 50-74 | +5.5 | L −18.5 | 143.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 77-84 | +7.5 | W +0.5 | 145.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 9 | @ | W 74-66 | -5.5 | W +2.5 | 140.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 57-55 | +8.5 | W +10.5 | 144.5 | U 112 |
| Feb 16 | vs | L 78-86 | +2.5 | L −5.5 | 137.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 83-65 | +1.5 | W +19.5 | 149.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 87-92 | +5.5 | W +0.5 | 145.5 | O 179 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 51-72 | +4.5 | L −16.5 | 150.5 | U 123 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 67-64 | -9.5 | L −6.5 | 139.5 | U 131 |
| Mar 5 | vs | L 48-83 | +1.5 | L −33.5 | 145.5 | U 131 |
| Mar 9 | vs | W 77-65 | +7.5 | W +19.5 | 141.5 | O 142 |
| Mar 10 | vs | L 56-65 | +6.5 | L −2.5 | 142.5 | U 121 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
@
FSU
L 76-108
−4.5
6
@
USA
L 70-76
+12.5
8
@
MINN
L 50-95
−13.5
11
@
MD
L 64-84
+9.5
13
@
HOW
L 64-72
−1.5
18
@
LSU
L 81-107
+6.5
23
@
OU
L 53-72
+12.5
28
vs
INST
W 81-74
+19.5
29
@
LT
L 58-83
−8.5
3
@
ISU
L 68-132
−21.5
19
@
BAY
L 56-113
−21.5
29
@
MISS
L 43-79
−7.5
3
@
JKST
L 86-89
+2.5
10
@
AAMU
W 64-62
+11.5
12
@
ALST
L 66-81
−5.5
17
vs
TXSO
L 71-72
+0.5
19
vs
PV
W 76-75
+3.5
24
@
FAMU
L 58-66
+0.5
26
@
BCU
L 73-82
+4.5
31
vs
SOU
W 78-73
+12.5
2
vs
GRAM
L 50-74
−18.5
7
@
UAPB
L 77-84
+0.5
9
@
MVSU
W 74-66
+2.5
14
vs
BCU
W 57-55
+10.5
16
vs
FAMU
L 78-86
−5.5
21
vs
JKST
W 83-65
+19.5
26
@
TXSO
L 87-92
+0.5
28
@
PV
L 51-72
−16.5
3
vs
MVSU
W 67-64
−6.5
5
vs
UAPB
L 48-83
−33.5
9
vs
ALST
W 77-65
+19.5
10
vs
PV
L 56-65
−2.5
covered 18didn’t cover 14avg −0.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
@
FSU
L 76-108
+27.5
6
@
USA
L 70-76
+4.5
8
@
MINN
L 50-95
−7.5
11
@
MD
L 64-84
+1.5
13
@
HOW
L 64-72
−18.5
18
@
LSU
L 81-107
+32.5
23
@
OU
L 53-72
−35.5
28
vs
INST
W 81-74
+2.5
29
@
LT
L 58-83
+3.5
3
@
ISU
L 68-132
+48.5
19
@
BAY
L 56-113
+8.5
29
@
MISS
L 43-79
−26.5
3
@
JKST
L 86-89
+29.5
10
@
AAMU
W 64-62
−14.5
12
@
ALST
L 66-81
−4.5
17
vs
TXSO
L 71-72
−3.5
19
vs
PV
W 76-75
−1.5
24
@
FAMU
L 58-66
−17.5
26
@
BCU
L 73-82
+7.5
31
vs
SOU
W 78-73
+3.5
2
vs
GRAM
L 50-74
−19.5
7
@
UAPB
L 77-84
+15.5
9
@
MVSU
W 74-66
−0.5
14
vs
BCU
W 57-55
−32.5
16
vs
FAMU
L 78-86
+26.5
21
vs
JKST
W 83-65
−1.5
26
@
TXSO
L 87-92
+33.5
28
@
PV
L 51-72
−27.5
3
vs
MVSU
W 67-64
−8.5
5
vs
UAPB
L 48-83
−14.5
9
vs
ALST
W 77-65
+0.5
10
vs
PV
L 56-65
−21.5
over 15under 17avg −0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Texas St
30 games played
Straight up
17-13
57% wins
Against the spread
14-16
47% covers · avg −0.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-14
53% overs · avg +2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 48-83 | +5.5 | L −29.5 | 146.5 | U 131 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 71-79 | +12.5 | W +4.5 | 146.5 | O 150 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 80-69 | -2.5 | W +8.5 | 147.5 | O 149 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 77-67 | -4.5 | W +5.5 | 144.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 63-49 | -1.5 | W +12.5 | 138.5 | U 112 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 65-56 | -5.5 | W +3.5 | 131.5 | U 121 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 52-66 | +7.5 | L −6.5 | 136.5 | U 118 |
| Nov 29 | vs | L 74-78 | -6.5 | L −10.5 | 135.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 72-77 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 133.5 | O 149 |
| Dec 10 | vs | W 86-83 | -3.5 | L −0.5 | 142.5 | O 169 |
| Dec 17 | vs | L 70-89 | +4.5 | L −14.5 | 151.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 67-65 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 136.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 31 | @ | L 80-100 | +8.5 | L −11.5 | 145.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 84-79 | -10.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 70-80 | +2.5 | L −7.5 | 144.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 82-83 | +11.5 | W +10.5 | 156.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 59-54 | -8.5 | L −3.5 | 133.5 | U 113 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 74-67 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 140.5 | O 141 |
| Jan 22 | @ | L 70-72 | +1.5 | L −0.5 | 140.5 | O 142 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 57-82 | +5.5 | L −19.5 | 143.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 72-68 | +3.5 | W +7.5 | 147.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 81-64 | -2.5 | W +14.5 | 143.5 | O 145 |
| Feb 4 | @ | W 77-71 | +4.5 | W +10.5 | 151.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 77-61 | -6.5 | W +9.5 | 146.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 74-62 | +5.5 | W +17.5 | 140.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 95-84 | -14.5 | L −3.5 | 149.5 | O 179 |
| Feb 19 | @ | W 90-82 | +3.5 | W +11.5 | 137.5 | O 172 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 54-67 | -3.5 | L −16.5 | 134.5 | U 121 |
| Feb 27 | vs | W 60-57 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 135.5 | U 117 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 77-81 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 140.5 | O 158 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
BGSU
L 48-83
−29.5
8
@
TULN
L 71-79
+4.5
12
vs
UTSA
W 80-69
+8.5
15
vs
TXSO
W 77-67
+5.5
18
vs
ACU
W 63-49
+12.5
21
vs
LR
W 65-56
+3.5
28
vs
SEA
L 52-66
−6.5
29
vs
LEH
L 74-78
−10.5
3
@
RICE
L 72-77
−1.5
10
vs
SOU
W 86-83
−0.5
17
vs
ARST
L 70-89
−14.5
20
vs
USA
W 67-65
−1.5
31
@
TROY
L 80-100
−11.5
3
@
ULM
W 84-79
−5.5
8
@
USM
L 70-80
−7.5
10
@
ARST
L 82-83
+10.5
14
vs
UL
W 59-54
−3.5
17
vs
USM
W 74-67
+4.5
22
@
CCU
L 70-72
−0.5
24
@
JMU
L 57-82
−19.5
28
vs
MRSH
W 72-68
+7.5
31
vs
ODU
W 81-64
+14.5
4
@
GASO
W 77-71
+10.5
7
vs
WMU
W 77-61
+9.5
11
vs
TROY
W 74-62
+17.5
14
vs
ULM
W 95-84
−3.5
19
@
USA
W 90-82
+11.5
21
@
UL
L 54-67
−16.5
27
vs
APP
W 60-57
+4.5
6
vs
USM
L 77-81
−5.5
covered 14didn’t cover 16avg −0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
BGSU
L 48-83
−15.5
8
@
TULN
L 71-79
+3.5
12
vs
UTSA
W 80-69
+1.5
15
vs
TXSO
W 77-67
−0.5
18
vs
ACU
W 63-49
−26.5
21
vs
LR
W 65-56
−10.5
28
vs
SEA
L 52-66
−18.5
29
vs
LEH
L 74-78
+16.5
3
@
RICE
L 72-77
+15.5
10
vs
SOU
W 86-83
+26.5
17
vs
ARST
L 70-89
+7.5
20
vs
USA
W 67-65
−4.5
31
@
TROY
L 80-100
+34.5
3
@
ULM
W 84-79
+12.5
8
@
USM
L 70-80
+5.5
10
@
ARST
L 82-83
+8.5
14
vs
UL
W 59-54
−20.5
17
vs
USM
W 74-67
+0.5
22
@
CCU
L 70-72
+1.5
24
@
JMU
L 57-82
−4.5
28
vs
MRSH
W 72-68
−7.5
31
vs
ODU
W 81-64
+1.5
4
@
GASO
W 77-71
−3.5
7
vs
WMU
W 77-61
−8.5
11
vs
TROY
W 74-62
−4.5
14
vs
ULM
W 95-84
+29.5
19
@
USA
W 90-82
+34.5
21
@
UL
L 54-67
−13.5
27
vs
APP
W 60-57
−18.5
6
vs
USM
L 77-81
+17.5
over 16under 14avg +2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Texas St has the better starters
Position by position: Alcorn St 0, Texas St 2, even 3
Alcorn StBetterTexas St
G T. Thomas9 pts · 3 reb · 1 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G M. Drone14 pts · 3.3 reb · 2.9 ast
Score 56
G J. Felton TR1.7 pts · 1.3 reb · 0.3 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G Q. House TR15.1 pts · 3.4 reb · 3.3 ast
Score 84
G B. Thomas TR3 pts · 0.8 reb · 0.3 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G K. Younger TR15.1 pts · 4.3 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 76
F M. Taylor TR3.3 pts · 2 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 4
→TXSTBig
F D. Hall15.7 pts · 7.8 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 94
C C. Richardson TR6.5 pts · 2.4 reb · 0 ast
Score 45
→TXSTBig
F P. Djobet TR17.5 pts · 6.6 reb · 2 ast
Score 89
Alcorn StBetterTexas St
ALCN offense350th of 366 · -12.5
→TXSTBig
TXST defense112th of 366 · -1.4
ALCN defense354th of 366 · -9.9
→TXSTBig
TXST offense105th of 366 · -1.4
Backcourt-1.9 · 3 players
→TXSTBig
Backcourt+2.5 · 3 players
Frontcourt-1.8 · 2 players
→TXSTBig
Frontcourt+7.5 · 2 players
Bench-0.6 · 1 player
=Even
Bench-0.3 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestALCN betterTXST betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
T. Thomas22 minJ. Felton14 min · TRB. Thomas7 min · TRS. SunderlandNewJ. PowellNewJ. CraineNew
Forwards
M. Taylor14 min · TRJ. Walker5 min · TRB. CannonNewN. ThomasNew
Centers
C. Richardson15 min · TRA. TokpahNew
Guards
M. Drone31 minQ. House31 min · TRK. Younger29 min · TRK. Gumbs28 minD. Pernell22 minC. Steger11 min · TR
Forwards
D. Hall30 minP. Djobet30 min · TRR. Jessamy27 min · TRK. GrandisonNewD. AbisogunNewK. SandersNew
Centers
R. Fields16 min
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 66.9 #335 | Points per game | 71.9 #247 |
| 0.96 #352 | Points per possession | 1.06 #230 |
| 69.7 #138 | Pace (possessions) | 68.2 #223 |
| Shooting | ||
| 47.7 #320 | Effective FG% | 50.0 #238 |
| 33.3 #209 | 3-point % | 32.2 #271 |
| 33.7 #303 | 3-point attempt rate | 24.6 #364 |
| 31.8 #259 | Free throw rate | 34.0 #211 |
| Possessions | ||
| 19.6 #340 | Turnover rate | 18.7 #309 |
| 26.9 #297 | Offensive rebound rate | 33.9 #68 |
| 11.1 #333 | Assists per game | 12.7 #239 |
| Defense | ||
| 80.2 #322 | Points allowed | 72.5 #117 |
| 1.15 #324 | Points allowed per possession | 1.06 #106 |
| 55.0 #330 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.0 #210 |
| 33.0 #120 | Opponent 3-point % | 35.7 #293 |
| 18.1 #92 | Turnovers forced | 18.5 #75 |
| 64.5 #347 | Defensive rebound rate | 71.6 #81 |
| 7.7 #63 | Steals per game | 7.9 #41 |
| 3.4 #162 | Blocks per game | 3.6 #120 |
Alcorn St
9-23 in 2025-26 overall · 8-12 in conference · Southwestern Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Prairie View56–65
- Wvs Alabama St77–65
- Lvs AR-Pine Bluff48–83
- Wvs Miss Valley St67–64
- L@ Prairie View51–72
A week or more of rest.
Texas St
17-13 in 2025-26 overall · 11-8 in conference · Pac-12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Southern Miss77–81
- Wvs App State60–57
- L@ Louisiana54–67
- W@ South Alabama90–82
- Wvs UL Monroe95–84
A week or more of rest.