Leede Arena · at Dartmouth
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | DART | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects DART 76–69 · win probability DART 73%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 144.3
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: DART has more of the edges
HC 2, DART 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
HC offense vs DART defense
Offense 335th of 366 against a defense 229th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: HC plays 65.8 a game (320th fastest), DART 69.6 (143rd). Faster games mean more points
Turnovers
Turnover rate: HC 15.3%, DART 17.6%. Forced: HC 14.1%, DART 13.8%
Shooting
Effective FG%: HC 49.8 and allows 54.8; DART 51.8 and allows 52.7
Context
Schedule so far
HC has played the 225th-hardest schedule, DART the 145th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Three-pointers
HC hits 32.5% and allows 34.0%; DART hits 36.1% and allows 34.6%. Threes are 37.3% and 48.7% of their shots
Free throws
Free throw rate: HC 31.5, DART 38.0. Allowed: HC 27.6, DART 30.7
Home court
DART at home. This season: DART 0-0 at home, HC 0-0 away
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: HC 21.9%, DART 23.7%. Defensive: HC 73.0%, DART 70.3%
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: HC 51%, DART 40%. Transfers in: HC 0, DART 1. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
DART offense vs HC defense
Offense 261st of 366 against a defense 269th, on the model’s ratings
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | DART -7.0 | — |
| Total | — | 144.3 | — |
| Projected score | — | HC 68.7 · DART 75.7 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | DART -4.0 | — |
| 1H total | 67.5 | — |
| 1H projected score | HC 31.7 · DART 35.8 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | |
| 2-8 20% | 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
HC 0–1 DARTDART leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · HC 0-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2025-26 | DART 89 @ HC 64 | HC +1.5 | DART W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Holy Cross
31 games played
Straight up
9-22
29% wins
Against the spread
16-15
52% covers · avg +0.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-16
48% overs · avg −0.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 79-89 | +23.5 | W +13.5 | 152.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 53-98 | +38.5 | L −6.5 | 165.5 | U 151 |
| Nov 10 | @ | L 69-87 | +21.5 | W +3.5 | 155.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 16 | vs | W 67-61 | +4.5 | W +10.5 | 148.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 49-68 | +2.5 | L −16.5 | 141.5 | U 117 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 66-79 | +7.5 | L −5.5 | 152.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 69-73 | +9.5 | W +5.5 | 137.5 | O 142 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 76-59 | +8.5 | W +25.5 | 145.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 70-69 | +10.5 | W +11.5 | 138.5 | O 139 |
| Dec 16 | vs | L 64-89 | +1.5 | L −23.5 | 147.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 53-81 | +10.5 | L −17.5 | 136.5 | U 134 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 65-58 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 133.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 58-65 | +5.5 | L −1.5 | 137.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 58-66 | +2.5 | L −5.5 | 137.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 84-73 | +8.5 | W +19.5 | 137.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 82-75 | -4.5 | W +2.5 | 142.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 55-74 | +2.5 | L −16.5 | 138.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 68-85 | +11.5 | L −5.5 | 134.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 67-76 | +4.5 | L −4.5 | 139.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 74-79 | +10.5 | W +5.5 | 144.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 68-69 | +2.5 | W +1.5 | 144.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 2 | vs | L 64-72 | +2.5 | L −5.5 | 139.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 76-67 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 137.5 | O 143 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 70-74 | +8.5 | W +4.5 | 142.5 | O 144 |
| Feb 15 | @ | L 73-83 | +4.5 | L −5.5 | 146.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 83-86 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 139.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 22 | @ | W 72-63 | +2.5 | W +11.5 | 142.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 63-78 | +8.5 | L −6.5 | 141.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 62-76 | -1.5 | L −15.5 | 151.5 | U 138 |
| Mar 3 | @ | W 82-77 | +4.5 | W +9.5 | 141.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 5 | @ | L 66-69 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 142.5 | U 135 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
PROV
L 79-89
+13.5
8
@
BYU
L 53-98
−6.5
10
@
UTAH
L 69-87
+3.5
16
vs
HAMP
W 67-61
+10.5
18
@
BRWN
L 49-68
−16.5
21
@
SHU
L 66-79
−5.5
24
vs
SIE
L 69-73
+5.5
3
vs
NE
W 76-59
+25.5
6
@
FOR
W 70-69
+11.5
16
vs
DART
L 64-89
−23.5
20
@
HARV
L 53-81
−17.5
31
vs
BUCK
W 65-58
+8.5
3
vs
NAVY
L 58-65
−1.5
7
@
LEH
L 58-66
−5.5
10
@
AMER
W 84-73
+19.5
14
vs
ARMY
W 82-75
+2.5
17
@
LAF
L 55-74
−16.5
21
@
NAVY
L 68-85
−5.5
24
vs
AMER
L 67-76
−4.5
28
@
COLG
L 74-79
+5.5
31
@
ARMY
L 68-69
+1.5
2
vs
BU
L 64-72
−5.5
7
vs
LEH
W 76-67
+10.5
11
vs
COLG
L 70-74
+4.5
15
@
L-MD
L 73-83
−5.5
18
vs
LAF
L 83-86
−4.5
22
@
BUCK
W 72-63
+11.5
25
@
BU
L 63-78
−6.5
28
vs
L-MD
L 62-76
−15.5
3
@
LAF
W 82-77
+9.5
5
@
LEH
L 66-69
+2.5
covered 16didn’t cover 15avg +0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
PROV
L 79-89
+15.5
8
@
BYU
L 53-98
−14.5
10
@
UTAH
L 69-87
+0.5
16
vs
HAMP
W 67-61
−20.5
18
@
BRWN
L 49-68
−24.5
21
@
SHU
L 66-79
−7.5
24
vs
SIE
L 69-73
+4.5
3
vs
NE
W 76-59
−10.5
6
@
FOR
W 70-69
+0.5
16
vs
DART
L 64-89
+5.5
20
@
HARV
L 53-81
−2.5
31
vs
BUCK
W 65-58
−10.5
3
vs
NAVY
L 58-65
−14.5
7
@
LEH
L 58-66
−13.5
10
@
AMER
W 84-73
+19.5
14
vs
ARMY
W 82-75
+14.5
17
@
LAF
L 55-74
−9.5
21
@
NAVY
L 68-85
+18.5
24
vs
AMER
L 67-76
+3.5
28
@
COLG
L 74-79
+8.5
31
@
ARMY
L 68-69
−7.5
2
vs
BU
L 64-72
−3.5
7
vs
LEH
W 76-67
+5.5
11
vs
COLG
L 70-74
+1.5
15
@
L-MD
L 73-83
+9.5
18
vs
LAF
L 83-86
+29.5
22
@
BUCK
W 72-63
−7.5
25
@
BU
L 63-78
−0.5
28
vs
L-MD
L 62-76
−13.5
3
@
LAF
W 82-77
+17.5
5
@
LEH
L 66-69
−7.5
over 15under 16avg −0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Dartmouth
25 games played
Straight up
9-16
36% wins
Against the spread
11-14
44% covers · avg −0.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
12-13
48% overs · avg +0.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9 | vs | L 56-75 | -1.5 | L −20.5 | 138.5 | U 131 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 75-82 | +1.5 | L −5.5 | 151.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 16 | vs | L 77-85 | +1.5 | L −6.5 | 140.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 29 | @ | W 87-61 | +3.5 | W +29.5 | 144.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 69-68 | -8.5 | L −7.5 | 147.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 80-93 | +14.5 | W +1.5 | 156.5 | O 173 |
| Dec 9 | @ | L 55-76 | +20.5 | L −0.5 | 153.5 | U 131 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 77-64 | -2.5 | W +10.5 | 144.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 16 | @ | W 89-64 | -1.5 | W +23.5 | 147.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 19 | @ | L 63-85 | -1.5 | L −23.5 | 155.5 | U 148 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 72-94 | +35.5 | W +13.5 | 160.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 5 | @ | W 76-68 | +7.5 | W +15.5 | 148.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 102-91 | +9.5 | W +20.5 | 175.5 | O 193 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 74-84 | -2.5 | L −12.5 | 163.5 | U 158 |
| Jan 19 | vs | W 71-69 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 147.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 69-79 | +2.5 | L −7.5 | 156.5 | U 148 |
| Jan 30 | @ | L 68-83 | +15.5 | W +0.5 | 155.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 77-70 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 142.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 58-71 | +1.5 | L −11.5 | 140.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 13 | vs | L 70-83 | +9.5 | L −3.5 | 151.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 76-79 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 139.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 64-63 | +6.5 | W +7.5 | 150.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 27 | @ | L 71-80 | +6.5 | L −2.5 | 154.5 | U 151 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 61-82 | +1.5 | L −19.5 | 142.5 | O 143 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 90-111 | +4.5 | L −16.5 | 166.5 | O 201 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
9
vs
MRST
L 56-75
−20.5
12
@
BRY
L 75-82
−5.5
16
vs
APP
L 77-85
−6.5
29
@
SPU
W 87-61
+29.5
3
vs
UNH
W 69-68
−7.5
6
@
WYO
L 80-93
+1.5
9
@
CSU
L 55-76
−0.5
13
vs
BU
W 77-64
+10.5
16
@
HC
W 89-64
+23.5
19
@
SHU
L 63-85
−23.5
29
@
FLA
L 72-94
+13.5
5
@
HARV
W 76-68
+15.5
10
@
COR
W 102-91
+20.5
17
vs
PENN
L 74-84
−12.5
19
vs
PRIN
W 71-69
+3.5
24
vs
COLU
L 69-79
−7.5
30
@
YALE
L 68-83
+0.5
31
@
BRWN
W 77-70
+8.5
7
vs
HARV
L 58-71
−11.5
13
vs
YALE
L 70-83
−3.5
14
vs
BRWN
L 76-79
−5.5
21
@
COLU
W 64-63
+7.5
27
@
PENN
L 71-80
−2.5
28
@
PRIN
L 61-82
−19.5
7
vs
COR
L 90-111
−16.5
covered 11didn’t cover 14avg −0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
9
vs
MRST
L 56-75
−7.5
12
@
BRY
L 75-82
+5.5
16
vs
APP
L 77-85
+21.5
29
@
SPU
W 87-61
+3.5
3
vs
UNH
W 69-68
−10.5
6
@
WYO
L 80-93
+16.5
9
@
CSU
L 55-76
−22.5
13
vs
BU
W 77-64
−3.5
16
@
HC
W 89-64
+5.5
19
@
SHU
L 63-85
−7.5
29
@
FLA
L 72-94
+5.5
5
@
HARV
W 76-68
−4.5
10
@
COR
W 102-91
+17.5
17
vs
PENN
L 74-84
−5.5
19
vs
PRIN
W 71-69
−7.5
24
vs
COLU
L 69-79
−8.5
30
@
YALE
L 68-83
−4.5
31
@
BRWN
W 77-70
+4.5
7
vs
HARV
L 58-71
−11.5
13
vs
YALE
L 70-83
+1.5
14
vs
BRWN
L 76-79
+15.5
21
@
COLU
W 64-63
−23.5
27
@
PENN
L 71-80
−3.5
28
@
PRIN
L 61-82
+0.5
7
vs
COR
L 90-111
+34.5
over 12under 13avg +0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: Holy Cross 1, Dartmouth 1, even 3
Holy CrossBetterDartmouth
G J. St. Germain4.5 pts · 1.2 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 22
=Even
G C. McNamee5.7 pts · 3.4 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 34
F J. Nugent11.8 pts · 3.6 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 53
←HCBig
G L. Williams TR4.8 pts · 2.3 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 16
F A. Richard4.9 pts · 4 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 1
→DARTBig
G N. Abusara5 pts · 2.3 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 47
F D. Ryan4.7 pts · 2.1 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 21
=Even
G C. Hiatt3.4 pts · 1.6 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 8
F C. Hare2 pts · 1.5 reb · 0 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G B. Brown1.5 pts · 0.3 reb · 0.1 ast
Not ranked
Holy CrossBetterDartmouth
HC offense335th of 366 · -10.9
→DARTSmall
DART defense229th of 366 · -6.1
HC defense269th of 366 · -6.8
=Even
DART offense261st of 366 · -8.0
Backcourt-1.3 · 1 player
←HCBig
Backcourt-7.2 · 5 players
Frontcourt-6.1 · 4 players
=No call
FrontcourtNo numbers yet
Bench-0.7 · 3 players
=Even
Bench-0.4 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestHC betterDART betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. St. Germain15 minA. Mejia1 minA. AlijosiusNewK. HansonNewT. WilsonNewJ. GermanyNew
Forwards
J. Nugent30 minA. Richard27 minD. Ryan13 minC. Hare7 minJ. Haigh6 minE. Clark1 min
Centers
K. MgbejioforNew
Guards
C. McNamee20 minL. Williams20 min · TRN. Abusara17 minC. Hiatt17 minB. Brown9 minC. AldrichNew
Forwards
P. Tivnan6 minS. Simango3 minT. Garrett3 minJ. PollackNew
Centers
A. Strelnikov6 minD. CivelloNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 67.9 #314 | Points per game | 73.1 #222 |
| 1.03 #288 | Points per possession | 1.05 #253 |
| 65.8 #320 | Pace (possessions) | 69.6 #143 |
| Shooting | ||
| 49.8 #248 | Effective FG% | 51.8 #156 |
| 32.5 #252 | 3-point % | 36.1 #51 |
| 37.3 #225 | 3-point attempt rate | 48.7 #22 |
| 31.5 #268 | Free throw rate | 38.0 #103 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.3 #83 | Turnover rate | 17.6 #248 |
| 21.9 #356 | Offensive rebound rate | 23.7 #346 |
| 10.7 #346 | Assists per game | 12.8 #227 |
| Defense | ||
| 74.8 #182 | Points allowed | 78.4 #276 |
| 1.14 #305 | Points allowed per possession | 1.13 #287 |
| 54.8 #324 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.7 #254 |
| 34.0 #181 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.6 #227 |
| 14.1 #330 | Turnovers forced | 13.8 #339 |
| 73.0 #37 | Defensive rebound rate | 70.3 #148 |
| 5.5 #304 | Steals per game | 5.0 #337 |
| 1.7 #355 | Blocks per game | 3.5 #147 |
Holy Cross
9-22 in 2025-26 overall · 6-14 in conference · Patriot League
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Lehigh66–69
- W@ Lafayette82–77
- Lvs Loyola MD62–76
- L@ Boston U63–78
- W@ Bucknell72–63
A week or more of rest.
Dartmouth
9-16 in 2025-26 overall · 5-9 in conference · Ivy League
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Cornell90–111
- L@ Princeton61–82
- L@ Penn71–80
- W@ Columbia64–63
- Lvs Brown76–79
A week or more of rest.