Thomas Assembly Center · at Louisiana Tech
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | LT | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects TXST 75–68 · win probability TXST 74%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 143.5
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: TXST has more of the edges
TXST 4, LT 1 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
LT offense vs TXST defense
Offense 302nd of 366 against a defense 112th, on the model’s ratings
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: TXST 69%, LT 11%. Transfers in: TXST 5, LT 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Schedule so far
TXST has played the 298th-hardest schedule, LT the 197th. A record against a soft schedule means less
TXST offense vs LT defense
Offense 105th of 366 against a defense 184th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 67 possessions: TXST plays 68.2 a game (223rd fastest), LT 65.5 (332nd). Faster games mean more points
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: TXST 33.9%, LT 36.4%. Defensive: TXST 71.6%, LT 68.4%
Home court
LT at home. This season: LT 0-0 at home, TXST 0-0 away
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: TXST 50.0 and allows 52.0; LT 47.4 and allows 48.7
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: TXST 34.0, LT 33.1. Allowed: TXST 39.0, LT 36.3
Even
Three-pointers
TXST hits 32.2% and allows 35.7%; LT hits 28.6% and allows 33.9%. Threes are 24.6% and 33.4% of their shots
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: TXST 18.7%, LT 18.2%. Forced: TXST 18.5%, LT 17.9%
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | TXST -7.4 | — |
| Total | — | 143.5 | — |
| Projected score | — | TXST 75.4 · LT 68 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | TXST -4.5 | — |
| 1H total | 67.1 | — |
| 1H projected score | TXST 35.8 · LT 31.3 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8-2 80% | 7-3 70% | 4-6 40% | |
| 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Texas St
30 games played
Straight up
17-13
57% wins
Against the spread
14-16
47% covers · avg −0.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-14
53% overs · avg +2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 48-83 | +5.5 | L −29.5 | 146.5 | U 131 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 71-79 | +12.5 | W +4.5 | 146.5 | O 150 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 80-69 | -2.5 | W +8.5 | 147.5 | O 149 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 77-67 | -4.5 | W +5.5 | 144.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 63-49 | -1.5 | W +12.5 | 138.5 | U 112 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 65-56 | -5.5 | W +3.5 | 131.5 | U 121 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 52-66 | +7.5 | L −6.5 | 136.5 | U 118 |
| Nov 29 | vs | L 74-78 | -6.5 | L −10.5 | 135.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 72-77 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 133.5 | O 149 |
| Dec 10 | vs | W 86-83 | -3.5 | L −0.5 | 142.5 | O 169 |
| Dec 17 | vs | L 70-89 | +4.5 | L −14.5 | 151.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 67-65 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 136.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 31 | @ | L 80-100 | +8.5 | L −11.5 | 145.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 84-79 | -10.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 70-80 | +2.5 | L −7.5 | 144.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 82-83 | +11.5 | W +10.5 | 156.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 59-54 | -8.5 | L −3.5 | 133.5 | U 113 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 74-67 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 140.5 | O 141 |
| Jan 22 | @ | L 70-72 | +1.5 | L −0.5 | 140.5 | O 142 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 57-82 | +5.5 | L −19.5 | 143.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 72-68 | +3.5 | W +7.5 | 147.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 81-64 | -2.5 | W +14.5 | 143.5 | O 145 |
| Feb 4 | @ | W 77-71 | +4.5 | W +10.5 | 151.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 77-61 | -6.5 | W +9.5 | 146.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 74-62 | +5.5 | W +17.5 | 140.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 95-84 | -14.5 | L −3.5 | 149.5 | O 179 |
| Feb 19 | @ | W 90-82 | +3.5 | W +11.5 | 137.5 | O 172 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 54-67 | -3.5 | L −16.5 | 134.5 | U 121 |
| Feb 27 | vs | W 60-57 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 135.5 | U 117 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 77-81 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 140.5 | O 158 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
BGSU
L 48-83
−29.5
8
@
TULN
L 71-79
+4.5
12
vs
UTSA
W 80-69
+8.5
15
vs
TXSO
W 77-67
+5.5
18
vs
ACU
W 63-49
+12.5
21
vs
LR
W 65-56
+3.5
28
vs
SEA
L 52-66
−6.5
29
vs
LEH
L 74-78
−10.5
3
@
RICE
L 72-77
−1.5
10
vs
SOU
W 86-83
−0.5
17
vs
ARST
L 70-89
−14.5
20
vs
USA
W 67-65
−1.5
31
@
TROY
L 80-100
−11.5
3
@
ULM
W 84-79
−5.5
8
@
USM
L 70-80
−7.5
10
@
ARST
L 82-83
+10.5
14
vs
UL
W 59-54
−3.5
17
vs
USM
W 74-67
+4.5
22
@
CCU
L 70-72
−0.5
24
@
JMU
L 57-82
−19.5
28
vs
MRSH
W 72-68
+7.5
31
vs
ODU
W 81-64
+14.5
4
@
GASO
W 77-71
+10.5
7
vs
WMU
W 77-61
+9.5
11
vs
TROY
W 74-62
+17.5
14
vs
ULM
W 95-84
−3.5
19
@
USA
W 90-82
+11.5
21
@
UL
L 54-67
−16.5
27
vs
APP
W 60-57
+4.5
6
vs
USM
L 77-81
−5.5
covered 14didn’t cover 16avg −0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
BGSU
L 48-83
−15.5
8
@
TULN
L 71-79
+3.5
12
vs
UTSA
W 80-69
+1.5
15
vs
TXSO
W 77-67
−0.5
18
vs
ACU
W 63-49
−26.5
21
vs
LR
W 65-56
−10.5
28
vs
SEA
L 52-66
−18.5
29
vs
LEH
L 74-78
+16.5
3
@
RICE
L 72-77
+15.5
10
vs
SOU
W 86-83
+26.5
17
vs
ARST
L 70-89
+7.5
20
vs
USA
W 67-65
−4.5
31
@
TROY
L 80-100
+34.5
3
@
ULM
W 84-79
+12.5
8
@
USM
L 70-80
+5.5
10
@
ARST
L 82-83
+8.5
14
vs
UL
W 59-54
−20.5
17
vs
USM
W 74-67
+0.5
22
@
CCU
L 70-72
+1.5
24
@
JMU
L 57-82
−4.5
28
vs
MRSH
W 72-68
−7.5
31
vs
ODU
W 81-64
+1.5
4
@
GASO
W 77-71
−3.5
7
vs
WMU
W 77-61
−8.5
11
vs
TROY
W 74-62
−4.5
14
vs
ULM
W 95-84
+29.5
19
@
USA
W 90-82
+34.5
21
@
UL
L 54-67
−13.5
27
vs
APP
W 60-57
−18.5
6
vs
USM
L 77-81
+17.5
over 16under 14avg +2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Louisiana Tech
31 games played
Straight up
17-14
55% wins
Against the spread
17-14
55% covers · avg +1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-15
52% overs · avg −2.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | @ | L 50-77 | +9.5 | L −17.5 | 136.5 | U 127 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 68-51 | -8.5 | W +8.5 | 146.5 | U 119 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 51-60 | +3.5 | L −5.5 | 147.5 | U 111 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 75-73 | -2.5 | L −0.5 | 141.5 | O 148 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 83-58 | -16.5 | W +8.5 | 137.5 | O 141 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 69-77 | +1.5 | L −6.5 | 145.5 | O 146 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 65-44 | -9.5 | W +11.5 | 126.5 | U 109 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 53-61 | +4.5 | L −3.5 | 140.5 | U 114 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 75-63 | -2.5 | W +9.5 | 130.5 | O 138 |
| Jan 2 | @ | L 51-88 | +6.5 | L −30.5 | 134.5 | O 139 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 61-66 | +9.5 | W +4.5 | 145.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 8 | vs | L 56-72 | +4.5 | L −11.5 | 135.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 70-68 | -6.5 | L −4.5 | 123.5 | O 138 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 59-58 | +3.5 | W +4.5 | 131.5 | U 117 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 60-64 | +4.5 | W +0.5 | 127.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 23 | vs | W 82-76 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 144.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 69-59 | +2.5 | W +12.5 | 130.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 67-83 | +7.5 | L −8.5 | 141.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 63-72 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 135.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 87-78 | +3.5 | W +12.5 | 143.5 | O 165 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 79-78 | +3.5 | W +4.5 | 136.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 64-77 | +3.5 | L −9.5 | 146.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 77-71 | -2.5 | W +3.5 | 132.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 55-58 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 147.5 | U 113 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 72-70 | -2.5 | L −0.5 | 138.5 | O 142 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 76-84 | -2.5 | L −10.5 | 145.5 | O 160 |
| Mar 5 | @ | W 76-71 | +8.5 | W +13.5 | 136.5 | O 147 |
| Mar 7 | @ | W 81-38 | -2.5 | W +40.5 | 132.5 | U 119 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 80-69 | +1.5 | W +12.5 | 134.5 | O 149 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 69-66 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 134.5 | O 135 |
| Mar 14 | vs | L 60-71 | +1.5 | L −9.5 | 142.5 | U 131 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
@
NEV
L 50-77
−17.5
15
vs
JKST
W 68-51
+8.5
19
@
INST
L 51-60
−5.5
26
vs
INST
W 75-73
−0.5
29
vs
ALCN
W 83-58
+8.5
3
@
GASO
L 69-77
−6.5
13
vs
UL
W 65-44
+11.5
17
@
TULN
L 53-61
−3.5
29
vs
UTEP
W 75-63
+9.5
2
@
MTSU
L 51-88
−30.5
4
@
WKU
L 61-66
+4.5
8
vs
LIB
L 56-72
−11.5
10
vs
DEL
W 70-68
−4.5
14
vs
MTSU
W 59-58
+4.5
17
@
JXST
L 60-64
+0.5
23
vs
KENN
W 82-76
+7.5
28
@
UTEP
W 69-59
+12.5
31
@
SHSU
L 67-83
−8.5
4
vs
NMSU
L 63-72
−10.5
7
vs
SHSU
W 87-78
+12.5
12
@
MOST
W 79-78
+4.5
14
@
FIU
L 64-77
−9.5
18
vs
JXST
W 77-71
+3.5
21
@
KENN
L 55-58
+2.5
26
vs
MOST
W 72-70
−0.5
28
vs
FIU
L 76-84
−10.5
5
@
LIB
W 76-71
+13.5
7
@
DEL
W 81-38
+40.5
12
vs
MTSU
W 80-69
+12.5
13
vs
MOST
W 69-66
+4.5
14
vs
KENN
L 60-71
−9.5
covered 17didn’t cover 14avg +1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
@
NEV
L 50-77
−9.5
15
vs
JKST
W 68-51
−27.5
19
@
INST
L 51-60
−36.5
26
vs
INST
W 75-73
+6.5
29
vs
ALCN
W 83-58
+3.5
3
@
GASO
L 69-77
+0.5
13
vs
UL
W 65-44
−17.5
17
@
TULN
L 53-61
−26.5
29
vs
UTEP
W 75-63
+7.5
2
@
MTSU
L 51-88
+4.5
4
@
WKU
L 61-66
−18.5
8
vs
LIB
L 56-72
−7.5
10
vs
DEL
W 70-68
+14.5
14
vs
MTSU
W 59-58
−14.5
17
@
JXST
L 60-64
−3.5
23
vs
KENN
W 82-76
+13.5
28
@
UTEP
W 69-59
−2.5
31
@
SHSU
L 67-83
+8.5
4
vs
NMSU
L 63-72
−0.5
7
vs
SHSU
W 87-78
+21.5
12
@
MOST
W 79-78
+20.5
14
@
FIU
L 64-77
−5.5
18
vs
JXST
W 77-71
+15.5
21
@
KENN
L 55-58
−34.5
26
vs
MOST
W 72-70
+3.5
28
vs
FIU
L 76-84
+14.5
5
@
LIB
W 76-71
+10.5
7
@
DEL
W 81-38
−13.5
12
vs
MTSU
W 80-69
+14.5
13
vs
MOST
W 69-66
+0.5
14
vs
KENN
L 60-71
−11.5
over 16under 15avg −2.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Texas St has the better starters
Position by position: Texas St 1, Louisiana Tech 0, even 4
Texas StBetterLouisiana Tech
G M. Drone14 pts · 3.3 reb · 2.9 ast
Score 56
←TXSTSmall
G J. Fenner5.3 pts · 2.9 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 27
G Q. House TR15.1 pts · 3.4 reb · 3.3 ast
Score 84
=No call
G D. Bates NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
G K. Younger TR15.1 pts · 4.3 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 76
=No call
G K. Tilley NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
F D. Hall15.7 pts · 7.8 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 94
=No call
F E. Blackmon NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
F P. Djobet TR17.5 pts · 6.6 reb · 2 ast
Score 89
=No call
F L. Rowe NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
Texas StBetterLouisiana Tech
TXST offense105th of 366 · -1.4
←TXSTSmall
LT defense184th of 366 · -4.3
TXST defense112th of 366 · -1.4
←TXSTBig
LT offense302nd of 366 · -9.4
Backcourt+2.5 · 3 players
←TXSTBig
Backcourt-1.6 · 3 players
Frontcourt+7.5 · 2 players
=No call
FrontcourtNo numbers yet
Bench-0.3 · 5 players
=No call
BenchNo numbers yet
Score, worst to bestTXST betterLT betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
M. Drone31 minQ. House31 min · TRK. Younger29 min · TRK. Gumbs28 minD. Pernell22 minC. Steger11 min · TR
Forwards
D. Hall30 minP. Djobet30 min · TRR. Jessamy27 min · TRK. GrandisonNewD. AbisogunNewK. SandersNew
Centers
R. Fields16 min
Guards
J. Fenner22 minD. BatesNewK. TilleyNewJ. TylerNewJ. SandersonNewA. BoydNew
Forwards
E. BlackmonNewL. RoweNewB. WengerNewI. EmelifeNewI. FrancisNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 71.9 #247 | Points per game | 67.8 #318 |
| 1.06 #230 | Points per possession | 1.03 #284 |
| 68.2 #223 | Pace (possessions) | 65.5 #332 |
| Shooting | ||
| 50.0 #238 | Effective FG% | 47.4 #329 |
| 32.2 #271 | 3-point % | 28.6 #359 |
| 24.6 #364 | 3-point attempt rate | 33.4 #310 |
| 34.0 #211 | Free throw rate | 33.1 #234 |
| Possessions | ||
| 18.7 #309 | Turnover rate | 18.2 #283 |
| 33.9 #68 | Offensive rebound rate | 36.4 #21 |
| 12.7 #239 | Assists per game | 11.9 #297 |
| Defense | ||
| 72.5 #117 | Points allowed | 67.8 #30 |
| 1.06 #106 | Points allowed per possession | 1.04 #75 |
| 52.0 #210 | Opponent effective FG% | 48.7 #51 |
| 35.7 #293 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.9 #178 |
| 18.5 #75 | Turnovers forced | 17.9 #102 |
| 71.6 #81 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.4 #232 |
| 7.9 #41 | Steals per game | 6.8 #144 |
| 3.6 #120 | Blocks per game | 4.6 #31 |
Texas St
17-13 in 2025-26 overall · 11-8 in conference · Pac-12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Southern Miss77–81
- Wvs App State60–57
- L@ Louisiana54–67
- W@ South Alabama90–82
- Wvs UL Monroe95–84
A week or more of rest.
Louisiana Tech
17-14 in 2025-26 overall · 13-10 in conference · Sun Belt Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Kennesaw St60–71
- Wvs Missouri St69–66
- Wvs MTSU80–69
- W@ Delaware81–38
- W@ Liberty76–71
A week or more of rest.