Addition Financial Arena · at UCF
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | UCF | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects UCF 88–71 · win probability UCF 93%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 159.2
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: YALE has more of the edges
YALE 3, UCF 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Free throws
Free throw rate: YALE 35.1, UCF 30.5. Allowed: YALE 26.8, UCF 34.9
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: YALE plays 66.4 a game (301st fastest), UCF 71.2 (63rd). Faster games mean more points
UCF offense vs YALE defense
Offense 18th of 366 against a defense 136th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
YALE has played the 141st-hardest schedule, UCF the 41st. A record against a soft schedule means less
Turnovers
Turnover rate: YALE 14.0%, UCF 16.0%. Forced: YALE 16.2%, UCF 15.7%
Shooting
Effective FG%: YALE 55.6 and allows 51.6; UCF 52.6 and allows 52.1
Home court
UCF at home. This season: UCF 0-0 at home, YALE 0-0 away
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: YALE 42%, UCF 20%. Transfers in: YALE 0, UCF 7. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: YALE 34.2%, UCF 35.0%. Defensive: YALE 70.3%, UCF 71.2%
Even
YALE offense vs UCF defense
Offense 125th of 366 against a defense 93rd, on the model’s ratings
Even
Three-pointers
YALE hits 39.4% and allows 35.0%; UCF hits 36.2% and allows 33.9%. Threes are 36.1% and 34.8% of their shots
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | UCF -16.6 | — |
| Total | — | 159.2 | — |
| Projected score | — | YALE 71.3 · UCF 87.9 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | UCF -9.8 | — |
| 1H total | 74.4 | — |
| 1H projected score | YALE 32.3 · UCF 42.1 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7-3 70% | 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% | |
| 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Yale
29 games played
Straight up
22-7
76% wins
Against the spread
12-17
41% covers · avg −0.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-14
52% overs · avg +1.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | @ | W 97-68 | -5.5 | W +23.5 | 147.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 11 | @ | W 97-60 | -6.5 | W +30.5 | 156.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 86-79 | -20.5 | L −13.5 | 150.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 18 | vs | L 77-86 | -8.5 | L −17.5 | 153.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 73-67 | -17.5 | L −11.5 | 148.5 | U 140 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 74-63 | -6.5 | W +4.5 | 148.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 97-94 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 156.5 | O 191 |
| Nov 30 | @ | W 77-74 | -6.5 | L −3.5 | 147.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 80-66 | -12.5 | W +1.5 | 148.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 10 | vs | W 93-82 | -17.5 | L −6.5 | 145.5 | O 175 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 78-102 | +15.5 | L −8.5 | 171.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 5 | @ | W 70-53 | -8.5 | W +8.5 | 142.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 60-76 | -7.5 | L −23.5 | 142.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 102-68 | -9.5 | W +24.5 | 174.5 | U 170 |
| Jan 19 | vs | W 91-74 | -9.5 | W +7.5 | 150.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 77-60 | -6.5 | W +10.5 | 157.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 30 | vs | W 83-68 | -15.5 | L −0.5 | 155.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 65-67 | -11.5 | L −13.5 | 141.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 6 | vs | W 81-69 | -15.5 | L −3.5 | 140.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 9 | @ | W 87-81 | -6.5 | L −0.5 | 147.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 13 | @ | W 83-70 | -9.5 | W +3.5 | 151.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 76-75 | -4.5 | L −3.5 | 138.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 74-70 | -9.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 27 | @ | L 69-72 | -4.5 | L −7.5 | 164.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 60-54 | -6.5 | L −0.5 | 147.5 | U 114 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 78-53 | -14.5 | W +10.5 | 137.5 | U 131 |
| Mar 14 | vs | W 88-76 | -5.5 | W +6.5 | 163.5 | O 164 |
| Mar 15 | vs | L 84-88 | -9.5 | L −13.5 | 144.5 | O 172 |
| Mar 17 | vs | L 67-68 | -4.5 | L −5.5 | 148.5 | U 135 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
@
NAVY
W 97-68
+23.5
11
@
QUIN
W 97-60
+30.5
15
vs
STBK
W 86-79
−13.5
18
vs
URI
L 77-86
−17.5
21
vs
GB
W 73-67
−11.5
23
vs
COFC
W 74-63
+4.5
24
vs
AKR
W 97-94
+4.5
30
@
UVM
W 77-74
−3.5
7
vs
UIC
W 80-66
+1.5
10
vs
UALB
W 93-82
−6.5
29
@
ALA
L 78-102
−8.5
5
@
BRWN
W 70-53
+8.5
10
@
PRIN
L 60-76
−23.5
17
vs
COR
W 102-68
+24.5
19
vs
COLU
W 91-74
+7.5
24
@
PENN
W 77-60
+10.5
30
vs
DART
W 83-68
−0.5
31
vs
HARV
L 65-67
−13.5
6
vs
BRWN
W 81-69
−3.5
9
@
HOW
W 87-81
−0.5
13
@
DART
W 83-70
+3.5
14
@
HARV
W 76-75
−3.5
21
vs
PENN
W 74-70
−5.5
27
@
COR
L 69-72
−7.5
28
@
COLU
W 60-54
−0.5
7
vs
PRIN
W 78-53
+10.5
14
vs
COR
W 88-76
+6.5
15
vs
PENN
L 84-88
−13.5
17
vs
UNCW
L 67-68
−5.5
covered 12didn’t cover 17avg −0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
@
NAVY
W 97-68
+17.5
11
@
QUIN
W 97-60
+0.5
15
vs
STBK
W 86-79
+14.5
18
vs
URI
L 77-86
+9.5
21
vs
GB
W 73-67
−8.5
23
vs
COFC
W 74-63
−11.5
24
vs
AKR
W 97-94
+34.5
30
@
UVM
W 77-74
+3.5
7
vs
UIC
W 80-66
−2.5
10
vs
UALB
W 93-82
+29.5
29
@
ALA
L 78-102
+8.5
5
@
BRWN
W 70-53
−19.5
10
@
PRIN
L 60-76
−6.5
17
vs
COR
W 102-68
−4.5
19
vs
COLU
W 91-74
+14.5
24
@
PENN
W 77-60
−20.5
30
vs
DART
W 83-68
−4.5
31
vs
HARV
L 65-67
−9.5
6
vs
BRWN
W 81-69
+9.5
9
@
HOW
W 87-81
+20.5
13
@
DART
W 83-70
+1.5
14
@
HARV
W 76-75
+12.5
21
vs
PENN
W 74-70
−6.5
27
@
COR
L 69-72
−23.5
28
@
COLU
W 60-54
−33.5
7
vs
PRIN
W 78-53
−6.5
14
vs
COR
W 88-76
+0.5
15
vs
PENN
L 84-88
+27.5
17
vs
UNCW
L 67-68
−13.5
over 15under 14avg +1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
UCF
33 games played
Straight up
21-12
64% wins
Against the spread
16-17
48% covers · avg +1.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-20
39% overs · avg +1.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 82-78 | -8.5 | L −4.5 | 140.5 | O 160 |
| Nov 8 | vs | L 93-105 | +10.5 | L −1.5 | 166.5 | O 198 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 97-60 | -23.5 | W +13.5 | 169.5 | U 157 |
| Nov 14 | @ | W 86-74 | +10.5 | W +22.5 | 172.5 | U 160 |
| Nov 17 | vs | W 87-83 | -13.5 | L −9.5 | 163.5 | O 170 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 77-67 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 149.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 102-91 | -13.5 | L −2.5 | 162.5 | O 193 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 82-57 | -25.5 | L −0.5 | 159.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 86-61 | -9.5 | W +15.5 | 148.5 | U 147 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 81-63 | -16.5 | W +1.5 | 160.5 | U 144 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 102-80 | -17.5 | W +4.5 | 161.5 | O 182 |
| Dec 23 | vs | W 85-80 | -8.5 | L −3.5 | 162.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 81-75 | +4.5 | W +10.5 | 157.5 | U 156 |
| Jan 6 | @ | L 76-87 | +1.5 | L −9.5 | 175.5 | U 163 |
| Jan 11 | vs | W 73-72 | -2.5 | L −1.5 | 150.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 82-73 | +2.5 | W +11.5 | 170.5 | U 155 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 77-84 | +9.5 | W +2.5 | 165.5 | U 161 |
| Jan 20 | @ | L 57-87 | +14.5 | L −15.5 | 156.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 95-86 | +3.5 | W +12.5 | 159.5 | O 181 |
| Jan 27 | vs | W 79-76 | -6.5 | L −3.5 | 161.5 | U 155 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 88-80 | +5.5 | W +13.5 | 159.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 55-79 | +15.5 | L −8.5 | 146.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 8 | @ | L 72-92 | +4.5 | L −15.5 | 146.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 67-74 | -3.5 | L −10.5 | 140.5 | O 141 |
| Feb 17 | vs | W 82-71 | +1.5 | W +12.5 | 154.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 73-71 | -1.5 | W +0.5 | 154.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 24 | @ | W 97-84 | +14.5 | W +27.5 | 162.5 | O 181 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 86-87 | -1.5 | L −2.5 | 159.5 | O 173 |
| Mar 3 | vs | L 104-111 | -8.5 | L −15.5 | 167.5 | O 215 |
| Mar 6 | @ | L 62-77 | +4.5 | L −10.5 | 142.5 | U 139 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 66-65 | +3.5 | W +4.5 | 149.5 | U 131 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 59-81 | +15.5 | L −6.5 | 159.5 | U 140 |
| Mar 20 | vs | L 71-75 | +5.5 | W +1.5 | 151.5 | U 146 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
HOF
W 82-78
−4.5
8
vs
VAN
L 93-105
−1.5
11
vs
FAMU
W 97-60
+13.5
14
@
TA&M
W 86-74
+22.5
17
vs
OAK
W 87-83
−9.5
20
vs
PITT
W 77-67
+11.5
25
vs
QUIN
W 102-91
−2.5
29
vs
VMI
W 82-57
−0.5
7
vs
TOW
W 86-61
+15.5
17
vs
MER
W 81-63
+1.5
20
vs
FGCU
W 102-80
+4.5
23
vs
FAU
W 85-80
−3.5
3
vs
KU
W 81-75
+10.5
6
@
OKST
L 76-87
−9.5
11
vs
CIN
W 73-72
−1.5
14
@
KSU
W 82-73
+11.5
17
vs
ARIZ
L 77-84
+2.5
20
@
ISU
L 57-87
−15.5
24
@
COLO
W 95-86
+12.5
27
vs
ASU
W 79-76
−3.5
31
vs
TTU
W 88-80
+13.5
4
@
HOU
L 55-79
−8.5
8
@
CIN
L 72-92
−15.5
14
vs
WVU
L 67-74
−10.5
17
vs
TCU
W 82-71
+12.5
21
@
UTAH
W 73-71
+0.5
24
@
BYU
W 97-84
+27.5
28
vs
BAY
L 86-87
−2.5
3
vs
OKST
L 104-111
−15.5
6
@
WVU
L 62-77
−10.5
11
vs
CIN
W 66-65
+4.5
12
vs
ARIZ
L 59-81
−6.5
20
vs
UCLA
L 71-75
+1.5
covered 16didn’t cover 17avg +1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
HOF
W 82-78
+19.5
8
vs
VAN
L 93-105
+31.5
11
vs
FAMU
W 97-60
−12.5
14
@
TA&M
W 86-74
−12.5
17
vs
OAK
W 87-83
+6.5
20
vs
PITT
W 77-67
−5.5
25
vs
QUIN
W 102-91
+30.5
29
vs
VMI
W 82-57
−20.5
7
vs
TOW
W 86-61
−1.5
17
vs
MER
W 81-63
−16.5
20
vs
FGCU
W 102-80
+20.5
23
vs
FAU
W 85-80
+2.5
3
vs
KU
W 81-75
−1.5
6
@
OKST
L 76-87
−12.5
11
vs
CIN
W 73-72
−5.5
14
@
KSU
W 82-73
−15.5
17
vs
ARIZ
L 77-84
−4.5
20
@
ISU
L 57-87
−12.5
24
@
COLO
W 95-86
+21.5
27
vs
ASU
W 79-76
−6.5
31
vs
TTU
W 88-80
+8.5
4
@
HOU
L 55-79
−12.5
8
@
CIN
L 72-92
+17.5
14
vs
WVU
L 67-74
+0.5
17
vs
TCU
W 82-71
−1.5
21
@
UTAH
W 73-71
−10.5
24
@
BYU
W 97-84
+18.5
28
vs
BAY
L 86-87
+13.5
3
vs
OKST
L 104-111
+47.5
6
@
WVU
L 62-77
−3.5
11
vs
CIN
W 66-65
−18.5
12
vs
ARIZ
L 59-81
−19.5
20
vs
UCLA
L 71-75
−5.5
over 13under 20avg +1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
UCF has the better starters
Position by position: Yale 0, UCF 1, even 4
YaleBetterUCF
G T. Mullin11.8 pts · 2.4 reb · 2.6 ast
Score 63
=Even
G C. Vasko TR11 pts · 4.7 reb · 4.1 ast
Score 52
G J. Brathwaite6.6 pts · 1.8 reb · 1 ast
Score 35
→UCFBig
G D. Johnson TR23.5 pts · 3.2 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 100
G C. Wallace1.2 pts · 0.6 reb · 0.6 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F L. Walker TR18.7 pts · 4.9 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 87
F R. Fox9.8 pts · 1.9 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 76
=Even
F I. Malone TR10.4 pts · 5.5 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 82
F J. Sullivan1.3 pts · 0.7 reb · 0.2 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F C. Abass TR8.4 pts · 5.7 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 70
YaleBetterUCF
YALE offense125th of 366 · -3.3
=Even
UCF defense93rd of 366 · -0.4
YALE defense136th of 366 · -2.8
→UCFSmall
UCF offense18th of 366 · +8.0
Backcourt-1.1 · 3 players
→UCFBig
Backcourt+7.4 · 2 players
Frontcourt+0.5 · 2 players
→UCFBig
Frontcourt+5.3 · 3 players
Bench-0.5 · 4 players
→UCFSmall
Bench+2.0 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestYALE betterUCF betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
T. Mullin28 minJ. Brathwaite19 minC. Wallace4 minJ. Basima3 minA. Loving3 minJ. Tsai2 min
Forwards
R. Fox18 minJ. Sullivan5 minD. Ogunyemi3 minC. MayNewT. WinklerNewC. BolteNew
Centers
J. OwareNew
Guards
C. Vasko33 min · TRD. Johnson26 min · TRM. Dean17 min · TRC. Pacheco16 minA. DeanNewT. JonesNew
Forwards
L. Walker34 min · TRI. Malone23 min · TRC. Abass20 min · TRJ. Asemota8 min · TRL. GivanNewD. MannNew
Centers
J. Bol19 minE. Hulsewe5 min
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 80.1 #64 | Points per game | 80.7 #53 |
| 1.21 #10 | Points per possession | 1.13 #77 |
| 66.4 #301 | Pace (possessions) | 71.2 #63 |
| Shooting | ||
| 55.6 #26 | Effective FG% | 52.6 #123 |
| 39.4 #3 | 3-point % | 36.2 #49 |
| 36.1 #247 | 3-point attempt rate | 34.8 #281 |
| 35.1 #172 | Free throw rate | 30.5 #295 |
| Possessions | ||
| 14.0 #22 | Turnover rate | 16.0 #137 |
| 34.2 #62 | Offensive rebound rate | 35.0 #47 |
| 15.8 #53 | Assists per game | 15.7 #56 |
| Defense | ||
| 71.8 #102 | Points allowed | 78.3 #274 |
| 1.08 #166 | Points allowed per possession | 1.10 #219 |
| 51.6 #192 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.1 #221 |
| 35.0 #250 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.9 #176 |
| 16.2 #207 | Turnovers forced | 15.7 #241 |
| 70.3 #147 | Defensive rebound rate | 71.2 #96 |
| 5.3 #314 | Steals per game | 5.6 #285 |
| 3.2 #193 | Blocks per game | 3.0 #225 |
Yale
22-7 in 2025-26 overall · 12-4 in conference · Ivy League
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs UNC Wilmington67–68
- Lvs Penn84–88
- Wvs Cornell88–76
- Wvs Princeton78–53
- W@ Columbia60–54
A week or more of rest.
UCF
21-12 in 2025-26 overall · 10-10 in conference · Big 12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs UCLA71–75
- Lvs Arizona59–81
- Wvs Cincinnati66–65
- L@ West Virginia62–77
- Lvs Oklahoma St104–111
A week or more of rest.