UD Arena · at Dayton
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | DAY | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-1 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 1-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects DAY 85–62 · win probability DAY 98%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 146.7
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: DAY has more of the edges
NIU 0, DAY 7 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
NIU offense vs DAY defense
Offense 327th of 366 against a defense 57th, on the model’s ratings
DAY offense vs NIU defense
Offense 109th of 366 against a defense 327th, on the model’s ratings
Turnovers
Turnover rate: NIU 21.7%, DAY 16.9%. Forced: NIU 16.3%, DAY 21.0%
Shooting
Effective FG%: NIU 47.6 and allows 55.6; DAY 51.6 and allows 51.0
Three-pointers
NIU hits 30.9% and allows 36.3%; DAY hits 33.9% and allows 35.4%. Threes are 45.0% and 41.4% of their shots
Free throws
Free throw rate: NIU 38.3, DAY 46.1. Allowed: NIU 38.3, DAY 35.5
Context
Schedule so far
NIU has played the 167th-hardest schedule, DAY the 90th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Home court
DAY at home. This season: DAY 0-0 at home, NIU 0-0 away
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: NIU 30.3%, DAY 26.9%. Defensive: NIU 70.0%, DAY 71.2%
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: NIU plays 69.0 a game (181st fastest), DAY 68.3 (213th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: NIU 30%, DAY 31%. Transfers in: NIU 6, DAY 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | DAY -22.9 | — |
| Total | — | 146.7 | — |
| Projected score | — | NIU 61.9 · DAY 84.8 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | DAY -13.5 | — |
| 1H total | 68.6 | — |
| 1H projected score | NIU 27.6 · DAY 41.1 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2-8 20% | 3-7 30% | 2-8 20% | |
| 7-3 70% | 5-5 50% | 2-8 20% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
NIU 0–1 DAYDAY leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · NIU 0-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2021-22 | NIU 41 @ DAY 79 | DAY -17.5 | DAY W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
N Illinois
28 games played
Straight up
7-21
25% wins
Against the spread
13-15
46% covers · avg −3.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
8-20
29% overs · avg −4.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 102-82 | -7.5 | W +12.5 | 147.5 | O 184 |
| Nov 7 | @ | L 72-97 | +28.5 | W +3.5 | 157.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 10 | @ | L 59-88 | +22.5 | L −6.5 | 163.5 | U 147 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 57-70 | +19.5 | W +6.5 | 146.5 | U 127 |
| Nov 21 | @ | W 76-59 | +13.5 | W +30.5 | 148.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 25 | @ | L 59-77 | +6.5 | L −11.5 | 147.5 | U 136 |
| Dec 2 | vs | L 64-99 | -3.5 | L −38.5 | 147.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 55-84 | +18.5 | L −10.5 | 146.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 79-85 | +11.5 | W +5.5 | 156.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 74-73 | -2.5 | L −1.5 | 149.5 | U 147 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 67-81 | +6.5 | L −7.5 | 152.5 | U 148 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 73-77 | +16.5 | W +12.5 | 157.5 | U 150 |
| Jan 6 | vs | L 61-75 | +7.5 | L −6.5 | 161.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 13 | @ | L 59-77 | +7.5 | L −10.5 | 141.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 70-68 | +8.5 | W +10.5 | 157.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 20 | @ | L 77-80 | +11.5 | W +8.5 | 154.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 53-58 | +5.5 | W +0.5 | 141.5 | U 111 |
| Jan 27 | vs | W 85-65 | -1.5 | W +18.5 | 146.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 61-85 | +16.5 | L −7.5 | 158.5 | U 146 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 75-74 | +4.5 | W +5.5 | 143.5 | O 149 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 52-68 | +7.5 | L −8.5 | 144.5 | U 120 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 46-88 | +4.5 | L −37.5 | 146.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 17 | @ | W 72-70 | +9.5 | W +11.5 | 145.5 | U 142 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 66-74 | +6.5 | L −1.5 | 148.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 24 | @ | L 69-79 | +12.5 | W +2.5 | 150.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 43-79 | -1.5 | L −37.5 | 133.5 | U 122 |
| Mar 3 | vs | L 76-102 | +10.5 | L −15.5 | 148.5 | O 178 |
| Mar 6 | @ | L 55-94 | +23.5 | L −15.5 | 155.5 | U 149 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
ULM
W 102-82
+12.5
7
@
WIS
L 72-97
+3.5
10
@
GCU
L 59-88
−6.5
18
@
UNI
L 57-70
+6.5
21
@
LUC
W 76-59
+30.5
25
@
APSU
L 59-77
−11.5
2
vs
LIN
L 64-99
−38.5
6
@
BRAD
L 55-84
−10.5
13
@
ELON
L 79-85
+5.5
20
vs
CMU
W 74-73
−1.5
31
vs
BUF
L 67-81
−7.5
3
@
KENT
L 73-77
+12.5
6
vs
TOL
L 61-75
−6.5
13
@
EMU
L 59-77
−10.5
17
vs
MASS
W 70-68
+10.5
20
@
OHIO
L 77-80
+8.5
24
@
BALL
L 53-58
+0.5
27
vs
WMU
W 85-65
+18.5
31
@
M-OH
L 61-85
−7.5
7
@
GAST
W 75-74
+5.5
11
vs
BGSU
L 52-68
−8.5
14
@
CMU
L 46-88
−37.5
17
@
BUF
W 72-70
+11.5
21
vs
OHIO
L 66-74
−1.5
24
@
TOL
L 69-79
+2.5
28
vs
BALL
L 43-79
−37.5
3
vs
KENT
L 76-102
−15.5
6
@
AKR
L 55-94
−15.5
covered 13didn’t cover 15avg −3.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
ULM
W 102-82
+36.5
7
@
WIS
L 72-97
+11.5
10
@
GCU
L 59-88
−16.5
18
@
UNI
L 57-70
−19.5
21
@
LUC
W 76-59
−13.5
25
@
APSU
L 59-77
−11.5
2
vs
LIN
L 64-99
+15.5
6
@
BRAD
L 55-84
−7.5
13
@
ELON
L 79-85
+7.5
20
vs
CMU
W 74-73
−2.5
31
vs
BUF
L 67-81
−4.5
3
@
KENT
L 73-77
−7.5
6
vs
TOL
L 61-75
−25.5
13
@
EMU
L 59-77
−5.5
17
vs
MASS
W 70-68
−19.5
20
@
OHIO
L 77-80
+2.5
24
@
BALL
L 53-58
−30.5
27
vs
WMU
W 85-65
+3.5
31
@
M-OH
L 61-85
−12.5
7
@
GAST
W 75-74
+5.5
11
vs
BGSU
L 52-68
−24.5
14
@
CMU
L 46-88
−12.5
17
@
BUF
W 72-70
−3.5
21
vs
OHIO
L 66-74
−8.5
24
@
TOL
L 69-79
−2.5
28
vs
BALL
L 43-79
−11.5
3
vs
KENT
L 76-102
+29.5
6
@
AKR
L 55-94
−6.5
over 8under 20avg −4.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Dayton
37 games played
Straight up
25-12
68% wins
Against the spread
17-20
46% covers · avg −1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-24
35% overs · avg −2.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 88-48 | -25.5 | W +14.5 | 142.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 77-71 | -25.5 | L −19.5 | 154.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 62-74 | +5.5 | L −6.5 | 147.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 91-82 | -21.5 | L −12.5 | 148.5 | O 173 |
| Nov 19 | @ | W 77-71 | +6.5 | W +12.5 | 151.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 74-55 | -29.5 | L −10.5 | 146.5 | U 129 |
| Nov 27 | vs | W 84-79 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 145.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 79-83 | +9.5 | W +5.5 | 150.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 88-71 | -11.5 | W +5.5 | 140.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 73-86 | +5.5 | L −7.5 | 147.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 84-61 | -30.5 | L −7.5 | 159.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 97-69 | -6.5 | W +21.5 | 162.5 | O 166 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 61-64 | -9.5 | L −12.5 | 142.5 | U 125 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 63-56 | -16.5 | L −9.5 | 139.5 | U 119 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 70-68 | -7.5 | L −5.5 | 140.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 6 | vs | W 79-72 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 154.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 13 | @ | W 71-65 | -2.5 | W +3.5 | 152.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 16 | vs | W 78-51 | -16.5 | W +10.5 | 141.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 64-67 | -9.5 | L −12.5 | 137.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 74-81 | -6.5 | L −13.5 | 139.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 27 | vs | L 76-81 | -9.5 | L −14.5 | 138.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 30 | @ | L 71-102 | +9.5 | L −21.5 | 151.5 | O 173 |
| Feb 3 | vs | W 72-70 | -7.5 | L −5.5 | 144.5 | U 142 |
| Feb 6 | @ | L 73-99 | +8.5 | L −17.5 | 147.5 | O 172 |
| Feb 15 | vs | W 70-59 | -5.5 | W +5.5 | 140.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 82-67 | +2.5 | W +17.5 | 137.5 | O 149 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 78-66 | -6.5 | W +5.5 | 148.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 24 | vs | W 77-62 | +3.5 | W +18.5 | 157.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 27 | @ | W 68-66 | +2.5 | W +4.5 | 152.5 | U 134 |
| Mar 3 | @ | W 65-60 | -5.5 | L −0.5 | 144.5 | U 125 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 62-68 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 146.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 68-63 | -5.5 | L −0.5 | 141.5 | U 131 |
| Mar 14 | vs | W 70-69 | +4.5 | W +5.5 | 145.5 | U 139 |
| Mar 15 | vs | L 62-70 | +3.5 | L −4.5 | 139.5 | U 132 |
| Mar 18 | @ | W 80-66 | -2.5 | W +11.5 | 141.5 | O 146 |
| Mar 21 | @ | W 80-61 | -3.5 | W +15.5 | 138.5 | O 141 |
| Mar 25 | vs | L 55-61 | -7.5 | L −13.5 | 140.5 | U 116 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
CAN
W 88-48
+14.5
8
vs
UMBC
W 77-71
−19.5
11
@
CIN
L 62-74
−6.5
15
vs
BCU
W 91-82
−12.5
19
@
MARQ
W 77-71
+12.5
22
vs
NCCU
W 74-55
−10.5
27
vs
GTWN
W 84-79
+3.5
28
vs
BYU
L 79-83
+5.5
2
vs
ETSU
W 88-71
+5.5
6
vs
UVA
L 73-86
−7.5
13
vs
UNF
W 84-61
−7.5
16
vs
FSU
W 97-69
+21.5
20
vs
LIB
L 61-64
−12.5
31
vs
FOR
W 63-56
−9.5
3
@
LUC
W 70-68
−5.5
6
vs
GW
W 79-72
+4.5
13
@
DUQ
W 71-65
+3.5
16
vs
LUC
W 78-51
+10.5
21
@
LAS
L 64-67
−12.5
24
@
JOES
L 74-81
−13.5
27
vs
URI
L 76-81
−14.5
30
@
SLU
L 71-102
−21.5
3
vs
SBU
W 72-70
−5.5
6
@
VCU
L 73-99
−17.5
15
vs
DAV
W 70-59
+5.5
18
@
GMU
W 82-67
+17.5
21
vs
DUQ
W 78-66
+5.5
24
vs
SLU
W 77-62
+18.5
27
@
GW
W 68-66
+4.5
3
@
RICH
W 65-60
−0.5
6
vs
VCU
L 62-68
−7.5
13
vs
SBU
W 68-63
−0.5
14
vs
SLU
W 70-69
+5.5
15
vs
VCU
L 62-70
−4.5
18
@
BRAD
W 80-66
+11.5
21
@
UNCW
W 80-61
+15.5
25
vs
ILST
L 55-61
−13.5
covered 17didn’t cover 20avg −1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
CAN
W 88-48
−6.5
8
vs
UMBC
W 77-71
−6.5
11
@
CIN
L 62-74
−11.5
15
vs
BCU
W 91-82
+24.5
19
@
MARQ
W 77-71
−3.5
22
vs
NCCU
W 74-55
−17.5
27
vs
GTWN
W 84-79
+17.5
28
vs
BYU
L 79-83
+11.5
2
vs
ETSU
W 88-71
+18.5
6
vs
UVA
L 73-86
+11.5
13
vs
UNF
W 84-61
−14.5
16
vs
FSU
W 97-69
+3.5
20
vs
LIB
L 61-64
−17.5
31
vs
FOR
W 63-56
−20.5
3
@
LUC
W 70-68
−2.5
6
vs
GW
W 79-72
−3.5
13
@
DUQ
W 71-65
−16.5
16
vs
LUC
W 78-51
−12.5
21
@
LAS
L 64-67
−6.5
24
@
JOES
L 74-81
+15.5
27
vs
URI
L 76-81
+18.5
30
@
SLU
L 71-102
+21.5
3
vs
SBU
W 72-70
−2.5
6
@
VCU
L 73-99
+24.5
15
vs
DAV
W 70-59
−11.5
18
@
GMU
W 82-67
+11.5
21
vs
DUQ
W 78-66
−4.5
24
vs
SLU
W 77-62
−18.5
27
@
GW
W 68-66
−18.5
3
@
RICH
W 65-60
−19.5
6
vs
VCU
L 62-68
−16.5
13
vs
SBU
W 68-63
−10.5
14
vs
SLU
W 70-69
−6.5
15
vs
VCU
L 62-70
−7.5
18
@
BRAD
W 80-66
+4.5
21
@
UNCW
W 80-61
+2.5
25
vs
ILST
L 55-61
−24.5
over 13under 24avg −2.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Dayton has the better starters
Position by position: N Illinois 0, Dayton 4, even 1
N IllinoisBetterDayton
G M. Weisbrod TR11 pts · 2 reb · 8 ast
Score 27
→DAYBig
G Z. Lowery TR8.1 pts · 2.9 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 63
G T. Polite15 pts · 5 reb · 1 ast
Score 45
→DAYSmall
G L. Joseph TR7.9 pts · 2.6 reb · 2 ast
Score 78
G U. Buntyn TR12.5 pts · 2.8 reb · 3.3 ast
Score 52
=Even
F G. Randall TR11.5 pts · 6.7 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 65
G D. Douglas TR12 pts · 4 reb · 0 ast
Score 9
→DAYBig
F A. L'Etang11.9 pts · 5.9 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 89
F T. Samuels7 pts · 8.4 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 33
→DAYSmall
F J. Simon5.6 pts · 3.3 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 63
N IllinoisBetterDayton
NIU offense327th of 366 · -10.6
→DAYBig
DAY defense57th of 366 · +1.4
NIU defense327th of 366 · -8.5
→DAYBig
DAY offense109th of 366 · -1.7
Backcourt-5.2 · 4 players
→DAYBig
Backcourt+0.8 · 2 players
Frontcourt-1.4 · 1 player
→DAYBig
Frontcourt+3.5 · 3 players
Bench-3.5 · 3 players
→DAYBig
Bench+0.3 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestNIU betterDAY betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
M. Weisbrod31 min · TRT. Polite31 minU. Buntyn31 min · TRD. Douglas30 min · TRN. Carter-SmithNewC. HardrickNew
Forwards
T. Samuels30 minM. Ivanauskas20 min · TRJ. Daugherty10 min · TRA. McBirney-Griffin10 min · TRB. GrossNew
Guards
Z. Lowery23 min · TRL. Joseph18 min · TRT. Perry17 min · TRE. Dickey2 minM. Grant1 minW. Maxwell1 min
Forwards
G. Randall32 min · TRA. L'Etang26 minJ. Simon18 minM. Thomas9 minD. Friery6 minJ. HaynesNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 66.3 #341 | Points per game | 74.1 #193 |
| 0.96 #354 | Points per possession | 1.09 #167 |
| 69.0 #181 | Pace (possessions) | 68.3 #213 |
| Shooting | ||
| 47.6 #324 | Effective FG% | 51.6 #168 |
| 30.9 #323 | 3-point % | 33.9 #182 |
| 45.0 #66 | 3-point attempt rate | 41.4 #142 |
| 38.3 #95 | Free throw rate | 46.1 #2 |
| Possessions | ||
| 21.7 #360 | Turnover rate | 16.9 #198 |
| 30.3 #187 | Offensive rebound rate | 26.9 #298 |
| 11.6 #308 | Assists per game | 14.2 #134 |
| Defense | ||
| 78.9 #291 | Points allowed | 69.3 #50 |
| 1.15 #323 | Points allowed per possession | 1.01 #37 |
| 55.6 #342 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.0 #164 |
| 36.3 #315 | Opponent 3-point % | 35.4 #270 |
| 16.3 #199 | Turnovers forced | 21.0 #11 |
| 70.0 #161 | Defensive rebound rate | 71.2 #94 |
| 5.6 #288 | Steals per game | 8.2 #31 |
| 1.9 #352 | Blocks per game | 3.9 #90 |
N Illinois
7-21 in 2025-26 overall · 4-14 in conference · Horizon League
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Akron55–94
- Lvs Kent State76–102
- Lvs Ball State43–79
- L@ Toledo69–79
- Lvs Ohio66–74
5 days since their last game.
Dayton
25-12 in 2025-26 overall · 14-7 in conference · Atlantic 10 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Illinois St55–61
- W@ UNC Wilmington80–61
- W@ Bradley80–66
- Lvs VCU62–70
- Wvs Saint Louis70–69
A week or more of rest.