XFINITY Center · at Maryland
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | MD | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects UVA 77–71 · win probability UVA 70%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 148.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: UVA has more of the edges
UVA 4, MD 1 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Shooting
Effective FG%: UVA 54.6 and allows 45.8; MD 48.1 and allows 54.4
Three-pointers
UVA hits 36.3% and allows 31.6%; MD hits 31.7% and allows 36.3%. Threes are 46.7% and 46.9% of their shots
Turnovers
Turnover rate: UVA 16.0%, MD 18.6%. Forced: UVA 15.4%, MD 14.9%
Home court
MD at home. This season: MD 0-0 at home, UVA 0-0 away
MD offense vs UVA defense
Offense 63rd of 366 against a defense 13th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
UVA has played the 68th-hardest schedule, MD the 28th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: UVA 37.9%, MD 33.8%. Defensive: UVA 70.8%, MD 70.9%
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: UVA 57%, MD 47%. Transfers in: UVA 3, MD 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: UVA 32.3, MD 36.4. Allowed: UVA 32.9, MD 35.8
Context
Tempo
About 67 possessions: UVA plays 67.6 a game (247th fastest), MD 67.0 (281st). Faster games mean more points
Even
UVA offense vs MD defense
Offense 32nd of 366 against a defense 34th, on the model’s ratings
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | UVA -6.1 | — |
| Total | — | 148.8 | — |
| Projected score | — | UVA 77.4 · MD 71.4 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | UVA -3.8 | — |
| 1H total | 69.6 | — |
| 1H projected score | UVA 36.7 · MD 32.9 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7-3 70% | 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% | |
| 3-7 30% | 7-3 70% | 4-6 40% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
UVA 1–0 MDUVA leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · UVA 0-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2025-26 | MD 72 @ UVA 80 | UVA -16.5 | MD W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Virginia
36 games played
Straight up
30-6
83% wins
Against the spread
18-18
50% covers · avg +0.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-20
44% overs · avg +0.4 pts vs the total
Against the spread
18-1850%
2 straight misses ATS2 of last 4 covered
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 87-53 | -26.5 | W +7.5 | 148.5 | U 140 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 81-62 | -34.5 | L −15.5 | 151.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 91-53 | -24.5 | W +13.5 | 148.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 104-78 | -20.5 | W +5.5 | 155.5 | O 182 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 83-78 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 149.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 23 | vs | L 73-80 | -6.5 | L −13.5 | 155.5 | U 153 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 94-69 | -25.5 | L −0.5 | 160.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 3 | @ | W 88-69 | +3.5 | W +22.5 | 154.5 | O 157 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 86-73 | -5.5 | W +7.5 | 147.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 9 | vs | W 84-60 | -36.5 | L −12.5 | 134.5 | O 144 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 80-72 | -16.5 | L −8.5 | 153.5 | U 152 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 95-51 | -27.5 | W +16.5 | 153.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 31 | @ | L 85-95 | -5.5 | L −15.5 | 153.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 76-61 | +4.5 | W +19.5 | 151.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 84-60 | -14.5 | W +9.5 | 148.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 70-55 | -12.5 | W +2.5 | 143.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 13 | @ | W 79-70 | +4.5 | W +13.5 | 154.5 | U 149 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 72-68 | -2.5 | W +1.5 | 153.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 80-85 | -6.5 | L −11.5 | 152.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 27 | @ | W 100-97 | -9.5 | L −6.5 | 145.5 | O 197 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 73-66 | -13.5 | L −6.5 | 141.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 3 | vs | W 67-47 | -12.5 | W +7.5 | 142.5 | U 114 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 72-59 | -13.5 | L −0.5 | 147.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 10 | @ | W 61-58 | -8.5 | L −5.5 | 155.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 70-66 | -5.5 | L −1.5 | 146.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 94-68 | -13.5 | W +12.5 | 150.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 86-83 | -7.5 | L −4.5 | 145.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 24 | vs | W 90-61 | -6.5 | W +22.5 | 151.5 | U 151 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 51-77 | +9.5 | L −16.5 | 143.5 | U 128 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 75-70 | -14.5 | L −9.5 | 150.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 76-72 | -11.5 | L −7.5 | 145.5 | O 148 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 81-74 | -6.5 | W +0.5 | 153.5 | O 155 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 84-62 | -3.5 | W +18.5 | 146.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 14 | vs | L 70-74 | +6.5 | W +2.5 | 140.5 | O 144 |
| Mar 20 | vs | W 82-73 | -17.5 | L −8.5 | 146.5 | O 155 |
| Mar 22 | vs | L 72-79 | +1.5 | L −5.5 | 137.5 | O 151 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
RID
W 87-53
+7.5
7
vs
NCCU
W 81-62
−15.5
11
vs
HAMP
W 91-53
+13.5
15
vs
MRSH
W 104-78
+5.5
21
vs
NU
W 83-78
+0.5
23
vs
BTLR
L 73-80
−13.5
28
vs
QUC
W 94-69
−0.5
3
@
TEX
W 88-69
+22.5
6
vs
DAY
W 86-73
+7.5
9
vs
UMES
W 84-60
−12.5
20
vs
MD
W 80-72
−8.5
22
vs
AMER
W 95-51
+16.5
31
@
VT
L 85-95
−15.5
3
@
NCSU
W 76-61
+19.5
7
vs
CAL
W 84-60
+9.5
10
vs
STAN
W 70-55
+2.5
13
@
LOU
W 79-70
+13.5
17
@
SMU
W 72-68
+1.5
24
vs
UNC
L 80-85
−11.5
27
@
ND
W 100-97
−6.5
31
@
BC
W 73-66
−6.5
3
vs
PITT
W 67-47
+7.5
7
vs
SYR
W 72-59
−0.5
10
@
FSU
W 61-58
−5.5
14
vs
OSU
W 70-66
−1.5
18
@
GT
W 94-68
+12.5
21
vs
MIA
W 86-83
−4.5
24
vs
NCSU
W 90-61
+22.5
28
@
DUKE
L 51-77
−16.5
3
vs
WAKE
W 75-70
−9.5
7
vs
VT
W 76-72
−7.5
12
vs
NCSU
W 81-74
+0.5
13
vs
MIA
W 84-62
+18.5
14
vs
DUKE
L 70-74
+2.5
20
vs
WRST
W 82-73
−8.5
22
vs
TENN
L 72-79
−5.5
covered 18didn’t cover 18avg +0.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
RID
W 87-53
−8.5
7
vs
NCCU
W 81-62
−8.5
11
vs
HAMP
W 91-53
−4.5
15
vs
MRSH
W 104-78
+26.5
21
vs
NU
W 83-78
+11.5
23
vs
BTLR
L 73-80
−2.5
28
vs
QUC
W 94-69
+2.5
3
@
TEX
W 88-69
+2.5
6
vs
DAY
W 86-73
+11.5
9
vs
UMES
W 84-60
+9.5
20
vs
MD
W 80-72
−1.5
22
vs
AMER
W 95-51
−7.5
31
@
VT
L 85-95
+26.5
3
@
NCSU
W 76-61
−14.5
7
vs
CAL
W 84-60
−4.5
10
vs
STAN
W 70-55
−18.5
13
@
LOU
W 79-70
−5.5
17
@
SMU
W 72-68
−13.5
24
vs
UNC
L 80-85
+12.5
27
@
ND
W 100-97
+51.5
31
@
BC
W 73-66
−2.5
3
vs
PITT
W 67-47
−28.5
7
vs
SYR
W 72-59
−16.5
10
@
FSU
W 61-58
−36.5
14
vs
OSU
W 70-66
−10.5
18
@
GT
W 94-68
+11.5
21
vs
MIA
W 86-83
+23.5
24
vs
NCSU
W 90-61
−0.5
28
@
DUKE
L 51-77
−15.5
3
vs
WAKE
W 75-70
−5.5
7
vs
VT
W 76-72
+2.5
12
vs
NCSU
W 81-74
+1.5
13
vs
MIA
W 84-62
−0.5
14
vs
DUKE
L 70-74
+3.5
20
vs
WRST
W 82-73
+8.5
22
vs
TENN
L 72-79
+13.5
over 16under 20avg +0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Maryland
33 games played
Straight up
12-21
36% wins
Against the spread
16-17
48% covers · avg −2.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
18-15
55% overs · avg −1.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 83-61 | -28.5 | L −6.5 | 139.5 | O 144 |
| Nov 7 | vs | L 60-70 | -4.5 | L −14.5 | 144.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 84-64 | -29.5 | L −9.5 | 146.5 | O 148 |
| Nov 15 | @ | W 89-82 | +8.5 | W +15.5 | 146.5 | O 171 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 95-90 | -17.5 | L −12.5 | 145.5 | O 185 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 74-67 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 164.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 61-100 | +14.5 | L −24.5 | 157.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 72-105 | +14.5 | L −18.5 | 166.5 | O 177 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 89-63 | -22.5 | W +3.5 | 143.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 64-83 | +10.5 | L −8.5 | 137.5 | O 147 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 83-101 | +19.5 | W +1.5 | 163.5 | O 184 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 72-80 | +16.5 | W +8.5 | 153.5 | U 152 |
| Dec 28 | vs | W 73-58 | -14.5 | W +0.5 | 154.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 2 | vs | L 54-64 | +1.5 | L −8.5 | 146.5 | U 118 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 66-84 | +7.5 | L −10.5 | 147.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 55-67 | +13.5 | W +1.5 | 147.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 13 | @ | L 71-88 | +9.5 | L −7.5 | 150.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 18 | vs | W 96-73 | -1.5 | W +21.5 | 148.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 70-89 | +18.5 | L −0.5 | 152.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 48-91 | +18.5 | L −24.5 | 141.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 1 | vs | L 63-93 | +15.5 | L −14.5 | 148.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 5 | vs | L 62-82 | +6.5 | L −13.5 | 150.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 8 | @ | W 67-62 | +10.5 | W +15.5 | 138.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 77-70 | +10.5 | W +17.5 | 138.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 15 | @ | L 57-68 | +2.5 | L −8.5 | 144.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 74-78 | +7.5 | W +3.5 | 142.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 64-60 | +4.5 | W +8.5 | 143.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 61-74 | +16.5 | W +3.5 | 142.5 | U 135 |
| Mar 1 | vs | L 65-69 | -4.5 | L −8.5 | 143.5 | U 134 |
| Mar 4 | @ | L 45-78 | +14.5 | L −18.5 | 153.5 | U 123 |
| Mar 8 | vs | L 72-78 | +14.5 | W +8.5 | 145.5 | O 150 |
| Mar 10 | vs | W 70-60 | +4.5 | W +14.5 | 139.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 64-75 | +11.5 | W +0.5 | 133.5 | O 139 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
COPP
W 83-61
−6.5
7
vs
GTWN
L 60-70
−14.5
11
vs
ALCN
W 84-64
−9.5
15
@
MARQ
W 89-82
+15.5
19
vs
MSM
W 95-90
−12.5
24
vs
UNLV
W 74-67
+4.5
25
vs
GONZ
L 61-100
−24.5
26
vs
ALA
L 72-105
−18.5
2
vs
WAG
W 89-63
+3.5
6
@
IOWA
L 64-83
−8.5
13
vs
MICH
L 83-101
+1.5
20
@
UVA
L 72-80
+8.5
28
vs
ODU
W 73-58
+0.5
2
vs
ORE
L 54-64
−8.5
7
vs
IU
L 66-84
−10.5
10
@
UCLA
L 55-67
+1.5
13
@
USC
L 71-88
−7.5
18
vs
PSU
W 96-73
+21.5
21
@
ILL
L 70-89
−0.5
24
@
MSU
L 48-91
−24.5
1
vs
PUR
L 63-93
−14.5
5
vs
OSU
L 62-82
−13.5
8
@
MINN
W 67-62
+15.5
11
vs
IOWA
W 77-70
+17.5
15
@
RUTG
L 57-68
−8.5
18
@
NU
L 74-78
+3.5
21
vs
WASH
W 64-60
+8.5
25
@
NEB
L 61-74
+3.5
1
vs
RUTG
L 65-69
−8.5
4
@
WIS
L 45-78
−18.5
8
vs
ILL
L 72-78
+8.5
10
vs
ORE
W 70-60
+14.5
11
vs
IOWA
L 64-75
+0.5
covered 16didn’t cover 17avg −2.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
COPP
W 83-61
+4.5
7
vs
GTWN
L 60-70
−14.5
11
vs
ALCN
W 84-64
+1.5
15
@
MARQ
W 89-82
+24.5
19
vs
MSM
W 95-90
+39.5
24
vs
UNLV
W 74-67
−23.5
25
vs
GONZ
L 61-100
+3.5
26
vs
ALA
L 72-105
+10.5
2
vs
WAG
W 89-63
+8.5
6
@
IOWA
L 64-83
+9.5
13
vs
MICH
L 83-101
+20.5
20
@
UVA
L 72-80
−1.5
28
vs
ODU
W 73-58
−23.5
2
vs
ORE
L 54-64
−28.5
7
vs
IU
L 66-84
+2.5
10
@
UCLA
L 55-67
−25.5
13
@
USC
L 71-88
+8.5
18
vs
PSU
W 96-73
+20.5
21
@
ILL
L 70-89
+6.5
24
@
MSU
L 48-91
−2.5
1
vs
PUR
L 63-93
+7.5
5
vs
OSU
L 62-82
−6.5
8
@
MINN
W 67-62
−9.5
11
vs
IOWA
W 77-70
+8.5
15
@
RUTG
L 57-68
−19.5
18
@
NU
L 74-78
+9.5
21
vs
WASH
W 64-60
−19.5
25
@
NEB
L 61-74
−7.5
1
vs
RUTG
L 65-69
−9.5
4
@
WIS
L 45-78
−30.5
8
vs
ILL
L 72-78
+4.5
10
vs
ORE
W 70-60
−9.5
11
vs
IOWA
L 64-75
+5.5
over 18under 15avg −1.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Maryland has the better starters
Position by position: Virginia 0, Maryland 2, even 3
VirginiaBetterMaryland
G J. Dixon TR15.7 pts · 3.7 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 82
=Even
G M. McNair TR16.9 pts · 5.2 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 84
G J. Vide TR12 pts · 3.1 reb · 4 ast
Score 66
→MDSmall
G A. Mills12.2 pts · 4.1 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 89
G C. Harmon TR13.2 pts · 3.7 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 73
=Even
G B. Boswell TR6.2 pts · 4.4 reb · 3.1 ast
Score 70
G S. Lewis10.6 pts · 3.6 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 77
→MDSmall
F P. Payne17.5 pts · 7.2 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 100
F T. De Ridder15.6 pts · 6.2 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 95
=Even
F T. Buljan TR13.1 pts · 10.3 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 97
VirginiaBetterMaryland
UVA offense32nd of 366 · +5.9
=Even
MD defense34th of 366 · +3.3
UVA defense13th of 366 · +6.6
=Even
MD offense63rd of 366 · +2.4
Backcourt+3.7 · 4 players
→MDSmall
Backcourt+4.9 · 3 players
Frontcourt+4.2 · 1 player
→MDBig
Frontcourt+11.4 · 2 players
Bench+3.8 · 5 players
←UVABig
Bench-2.3 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestUVA betterMD betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Dixon31 min · TRJ. Vide29 min · TRC. Harmon28 min · TRS. Lewis26 minC. Mallory24 minE. Gertrude6 min
Forwards
T. De Ridder28 minC. Lang2 minK. AnyaNewS. BarksdaleNewN. AdekunleNew
Centers
J. Grunloh21 minF. IbeNew
Guards
M. McNair37 min · TRA. Mills27 minB. Boswell27 min · TRD. Wagner24 min · TRM. Jabriel20 minG. Turkson11 min
Forwards
P. Payne27 minT. Buljan26 min · TRR. Jennings13 min · TRA. BrownNewB. OladotunNewA. TambedouNew
Centers
A. K'MedehoutoNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 80.4 #57 | Points per game | 69.7 #291 |
| 1.19 #21 | Points per possession | 1.04 #270 |
| 67.6 #247 | Pace (possessions) | 67.0 #281 |
| Shooting | ||
| 54.6 #49 | Effective FG% | 48.1 #311 |
| 36.3 #48 | 3-point % | 31.7 #293 |
| 46.7 #36 | 3-point attempt rate | 46.9 #35 |
| 32.3 #253 | Free throw rate | 36.4 #142 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.0 #141 | Turnover rate | 18.6 #300 |
| 37.9 #9 | Offensive rebound rate | 33.8 #73 |
| 16.3 #41 | Assists per game | 10.4 #351 |
| Defense | ||
| 68.8 #46 | Points allowed | 76.6 #232 |
| 1.02 #39 | Points allowed per possession | 1.14 #312 |
| 45.8 #8 | Opponent effective FG% | 54.4 #312 |
| 31.6 #46 | Opponent 3-point % | 36.3 #317 |
| 15.4 #256 | Turnovers forced | 14.9 #294 |
| 70.8 #120 | Defensive rebound rate | 70.9 #111 |
| 6.3 #199 | Steals per game | 4.8 #345 |
| 6.4 #1 | Blocks per game | 2.9 #237 |
Virginia
30-6 in 2025-26 overall · 17-4 in conference · Atlantic Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Tennessee72–79
- Wvs Wright St82–73
- Lvs Duke70–74
- Wvs Miami84–62
- Wvs NC State81–74
A week or more of rest.
Maryland
12-21 in 2025-26 overall · 5-17 in conference · Big Ten Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Iowa64–75
- Wvs Oregon70–60
- Lvs Illinois72–78
- L@ Wisconsin45–78
- Lvs Rutgers65–69
A week or more of rest.