Michelob ULTRA Arena · Neutral site
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | MD | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects TENN 82–69 · win probability TENN 88%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 151.3
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: TENN has more of the edges
TENN 5, MD 1 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Shooting
Effective FG%: TENN 51.4 and allows 47.8; MD 48.1 and allows 54.4
Three-pointers
TENN hits 33.4% and allows 30.5%; MD hits 31.7% and allows 36.3%. Threes are 32.1% and 46.9% of their shots
Turnovers
Turnover rate: TENN 17.4%, MD 18.6%. Forced: TENN 16.1%, MD 14.9%
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: TENN 13%, MD 47%. Transfers in: TENN 9, MD 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: TENN 44.7%, MD 33.8%. Defensive: TENN 72.2%, MD 70.9%
MD offense vs TENN defense
Offense 63rd of 366 against a defense 9th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: TENN plays 68.1 a game (226th fastest), MD 67.0 (281st). Faster games mean more points
Even
TENN offense vs MD defense
Offense 9th of 366 against a defense 34th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
TENN has played the 7th-hardest schedule, MD the 28th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Context
Neutral floor
No home court: the model takes it out of the line
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: TENN 37.4, MD 36.4. Allowed: TENN 36.3, MD 35.8
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | TENN -13.4 | — |
| Total | — | 151.3 | — |
| Projected score | — | TENN 82.3 · MD 69 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | TENN -8.1 | — |
| 1H total | 70.7 | — |
| 1H projected score | TENN 39.4 · MD 31.3 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% | |
| 3-7 30% | 7-3 70% | 4-6 40% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
TENN 1–0 MDTENN leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · TENN 0-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2022-23 | TENN 56 vs MD 53 | MD +5.5 | MD W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Tennessee
37 games played
Straight up
25-12
68% wins
Against the spread
17-20
46% covers · avg −1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
18-19
49% overs · avg +0.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 76-61 | -28.5 | L −13.5 | 143.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 95-56 | -27.5 | W +11.5 | 137.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 99-66 | -41.5 | L −8.5 | 155.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 17 | vs | W 91-66 | -26.5 | L −1.5 | 143.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 89-60 | -31.5 | L −2.5 | 157.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 85-60 | -14.5 | W +10.5 | 141.5 | O 145 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 76-73 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 136.5 | O 149 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 76-81 | -7.5 | L −12.5 | 140.5 | O 157 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 60-62 | -7.5 | L −9.5 | 147.5 | U 122 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 62-75 | -1.5 | L −14.5 | 149.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 83-62 | -4.5 | W +16.5 | 156.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 94-52 | -42.5 | L −0.5 | 152.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 30 | vs | W 105-54 | -44.5 | W +6.5 | 147.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 75-86 | -1.5 | L −12.5 | 158.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 6 | vs | W 85-71 | -12.5 | W +1.5 | 153.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 67-91 | +4.5 | L −19.5 | 151.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 13 | vs | W 87-82 | -11.5 | L −6.5 | 159.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 78-80 | -6.5 | L −8.5 | 145.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 79-73 | +4.5 | W +10.5 | 167.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 86-85 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 157.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 77-69 | -5.5 | W +2.5 | 147.5 | U 146 |
| Feb 3 | vs | W 84-66 | -12.5 | W +5.5 | 139.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 71-74 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 147.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 73-64 | -8.5 | W +0.5 | 147.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 73-63 | -14.5 | L −4.5 | 143.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 89-66 | -11.5 | W +11.5 | 149.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 69-65 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 150.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 24 | @ | L 69-73 | -3.5 | L −7.5 | 143.5 | U 142 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 69-71 | -5.5 | L −7.5 | 162.5 | U 140 |
| Mar 3 | @ | W 78-59 | -10.5 | W +8.5 | 141.5 | U 137 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 82-86 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 146.5 | O 168 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 72-62 | -5.5 | W +4.5 | 144.5 | U 134 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 68-75 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 147.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 20 | vs | W 78-56 | -12.5 | W +9.5 | 148.5 | U 134 |
| Mar 22 | vs | W 79-72 | -1.5 | W +5.5 | 137.5 | O 151 |
| Mar 27 | vs | W 76-62 | +2.5 | W +16.5 | 139.5 | U 138 |
| Mar 29 | vs | L 62-95 | +8.5 | L −24.5 | 146.5 | O 157 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
MER
W 76-61
−13.5
8
vs
NKU
W 95-56
+11.5
12
vs
UNF
W 99-66
−8.5
17
vs
RICE
W 91-66
−1.5
20
vs
TNST
W 89-60
−2.5
24
vs
RUTG
W 85-60
+10.5
25
vs
HOU
W 76-73
+5.5
26
vs
KU
L 76-81
−12.5
2
@
SYR
L 60-62
−9.5
6
vs
ILL
L 62-75
−14.5
16
vs
LOU
W 83-62
+16.5
21
vs
GWEB
W 94-52
−0.5
30
vs
SCST
W 105-54
+6.5
3
@
ARK
L 75-86
−12.5
6
vs
TEX
W 85-71
+1.5
10
@
FLA
L 67-91
−19.5
13
vs
TA&M
W 87-82
−6.5
17
vs
UK
L 78-80
−8.5
24
@
ALA
W 79-73
+10.5
28
@
UGA
W 86-85
−0.5
31
vs
AUB
W 77-69
+2.5
3
vs
MISS
W 84-66
+5.5
7
@
UK
L 71-74
−1.5
11
@
MSST
W 73-64
+0.5
14
vs
LSU
W 73-63
−4.5
18
vs
OU
W 89-66
+11.5
21
@
VAN
W 69-65
+6.5
24
@
MIZ
L 69-73
−7.5
28
vs
ALA
L 69-71
−7.5
3
@
SC
W 78-59
+8.5
7
vs
VAN
L 82-86
−6.5
12
vs
AUB
W 72-62
+4.5
13
vs
VAN
L 68-75
−8.5
20
vs
M-OH
W 78-56
+9.5
22
vs
UVA
W 79-72
+5.5
27
vs
ISU
W 76-62
+16.5
29
vs
MICH
L 62-95
−24.5
covered 17didn’t cover 20avg −1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
MER
W 76-61
−6.5
8
vs
NKU
W 95-56
+13.5
12
vs
UNF
W 99-66
+9.5
17
vs
RICE
W 91-66
+13.5
20
vs
TNST
W 89-60
−8.5
24
vs
RUTG
W 85-60
+3.5
25
vs
HOU
W 76-73
+12.5
26
vs
KU
L 76-81
+16.5
2
@
SYR
L 60-62
−25.5
6
vs
ILL
L 62-75
−12.5
16
vs
LOU
W 83-62
−11.5
21
vs
GWEB
W 94-52
−6.5
30
vs
SCST
W 105-54
+11.5
3
@
ARK
L 75-86
+2.5
6
vs
TEX
W 85-71
+2.5
10
@
FLA
L 67-91
+6.5
13
vs
TA&M
W 87-82
+9.5
17
vs
UK
L 78-80
+12.5
24
@
ALA
W 79-73
−15.5
28
@
UGA
W 86-85
+13.5
31
vs
AUB
W 77-69
−1.5
3
vs
MISS
W 84-66
+10.5
7
@
UK
L 71-74
−2.5
11
@
MSST
W 73-64
−10.5
14
vs
LSU
W 73-63
−7.5
18
vs
OU
W 89-66
+5.5
21
@
VAN
W 69-65
−16.5
24
@
MIZ
L 69-73
−1.5
28
vs
ALA
L 69-71
−22.5
3
@
SC
W 78-59
−4.5
7
vs
VAN
L 82-86
+21.5
12
vs
AUB
W 72-62
−10.5
13
vs
VAN
L 68-75
−4.5
20
vs
M-OH
W 78-56
−14.5
22
vs
UVA
W 79-72
+13.5
27
vs
ISU
W 76-62
−1.5
29
vs
MICH
L 62-95
+10.5
over 18under 19avg +0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Maryland
33 games played
Straight up
12-21
36% wins
Against the spread
16-17
48% covers · avg −2.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
18-15
55% overs · avg −1.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 83-61 | -28.5 | L −6.5 | 139.5 | O 144 |
| Nov 7 | vs | L 60-70 | -4.5 | L −14.5 | 144.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 84-64 | -29.5 | L −9.5 | 146.5 | O 148 |
| Nov 15 | @ | W 89-82 | +8.5 | W +15.5 | 146.5 | O 171 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 95-90 | -17.5 | L −12.5 | 145.5 | O 185 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 74-67 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 164.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 61-100 | +14.5 | L −24.5 | 157.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 72-105 | +14.5 | L −18.5 | 166.5 | O 177 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 89-63 | -22.5 | W +3.5 | 143.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 64-83 | +10.5 | L −8.5 | 137.5 | O 147 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 83-101 | +19.5 | W +1.5 | 163.5 | O 184 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 72-80 | +16.5 | W +8.5 | 153.5 | U 152 |
| Dec 28 | vs | W 73-58 | -14.5 | W +0.5 | 154.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 2 | vs | L 54-64 | +1.5 | L −8.5 | 146.5 | U 118 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 66-84 | +7.5 | L −10.5 | 147.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 55-67 | +13.5 | W +1.5 | 147.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 13 | @ | L 71-88 | +9.5 | L −7.5 | 150.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 18 | vs | W 96-73 | -1.5 | W +21.5 | 148.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 70-89 | +18.5 | L −0.5 | 152.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 48-91 | +18.5 | L −24.5 | 141.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 1 | vs | L 63-93 | +15.5 | L −14.5 | 148.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 5 | vs | L 62-82 | +6.5 | L −13.5 | 150.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 8 | @ | W 67-62 | +10.5 | W +15.5 | 138.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 77-70 | +10.5 | W +17.5 | 138.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 15 | @ | L 57-68 | +2.5 | L −8.5 | 144.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 74-78 | +7.5 | W +3.5 | 142.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 64-60 | +4.5 | W +8.5 | 143.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 61-74 | +16.5 | W +3.5 | 142.5 | U 135 |
| Mar 1 | vs | L 65-69 | -4.5 | L −8.5 | 143.5 | U 134 |
| Mar 4 | @ | L 45-78 | +14.5 | L −18.5 | 153.5 | U 123 |
| Mar 8 | vs | L 72-78 | +14.5 | W +8.5 | 145.5 | O 150 |
| Mar 10 | vs | W 70-60 | +4.5 | W +14.5 | 139.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 64-75 | +11.5 | W +0.5 | 133.5 | O 139 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
COPP
W 83-61
−6.5
7
vs
GTWN
L 60-70
−14.5
11
vs
ALCN
W 84-64
−9.5
15
@
MARQ
W 89-82
+15.5
19
vs
MSM
W 95-90
−12.5
24
vs
UNLV
W 74-67
+4.5
25
vs
GONZ
L 61-100
−24.5
26
vs
ALA
L 72-105
−18.5
2
vs
WAG
W 89-63
+3.5
6
@
IOWA
L 64-83
−8.5
13
vs
MICH
L 83-101
+1.5
20
@
UVA
L 72-80
+8.5
28
vs
ODU
W 73-58
+0.5
2
vs
ORE
L 54-64
−8.5
7
vs
IU
L 66-84
−10.5
10
@
UCLA
L 55-67
+1.5
13
@
USC
L 71-88
−7.5
18
vs
PSU
W 96-73
+21.5
21
@
ILL
L 70-89
−0.5
24
@
MSU
L 48-91
−24.5
1
vs
PUR
L 63-93
−14.5
5
vs
OSU
L 62-82
−13.5
8
@
MINN
W 67-62
+15.5
11
vs
IOWA
W 77-70
+17.5
15
@
RUTG
L 57-68
−8.5
18
@
NU
L 74-78
+3.5
21
vs
WASH
W 64-60
+8.5
25
@
NEB
L 61-74
+3.5
1
vs
RUTG
L 65-69
−8.5
4
@
WIS
L 45-78
−18.5
8
vs
ILL
L 72-78
+8.5
10
vs
ORE
W 70-60
+14.5
11
vs
IOWA
L 64-75
+0.5
covered 16didn’t cover 17avg −2.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
COPP
W 83-61
+4.5
7
vs
GTWN
L 60-70
−14.5
11
vs
ALCN
W 84-64
+1.5
15
@
MARQ
W 89-82
+24.5
19
vs
MSM
W 95-90
+39.5
24
vs
UNLV
W 74-67
−23.5
25
vs
GONZ
L 61-100
+3.5
26
vs
ALA
L 72-105
+10.5
2
vs
WAG
W 89-63
+8.5
6
@
IOWA
L 64-83
+9.5
13
vs
MICH
L 83-101
+20.5
20
@
UVA
L 72-80
−1.5
28
vs
ODU
W 73-58
−23.5
2
vs
ORE
L 54-64
−28.5
7
vs
IU
L 66-84
+2.5
10
@
UCLA
L 55-67
−25.5
13
@
USC
L 71-88
+8.5
18
vs
PSU
W 96-73
+20.5
21
@
ILL
L 70-89
+6.5
24
@
MSU
L 48-91
−2.5
1
vs
PUR
L 63-93
+7.5
5
vs
OSU
L 62-82
−6.5
8
@
MINN
W 67-62
−9.5
11
vs
IOWA
W 77-70
+8.5
15
@
RUTG
L 57-68
−19.5
18
@
NU
L 74-78
+9.5
21
vs
WASH
W 64-60
−19.5
25
@
NEB
L 61-74
−7.5
1
vs
RUTG
L 65-69
−9.5
4
@
WIS
L 45-78
−30.5
8
vs
ILL
L 72-78
+4.5
10
vs
ORE
W 70-60
−9.5
11
vs
IOWA
L 64-75
+5.5
over 18under 15avg −1.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Maryland has the better starters
Position by position: Tennessee 1, Maryland 2, even 2
TennesseeBetterMaryland
G J. Harris TR21.4 pts · 6.5 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 99
←TENNSmall
G M. McNair TR16.9 pts · 5.2 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 84
G T. Lundblade TR15.8 pts · 2.6 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 63
→MDSmall
G A. Mills12.2 pts · 4.1 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 89
G D. Dai Ames TR17 pts · 2 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 83
=Even
G B. Boswell TR6.2 pts · 4.4 reb · 3.1 ast
Score 70
F B. Lue TR10.9 pts · 5.1 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 53
→MDBig
F P. Payne17.5 pts · 7.2 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 100
C M. Rubin TR11.3 pts · 7.1 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 83
=Even
F T. Buljan TR13.1 pts · 10.3 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 97
TennesseeBetterMaryland
TENN offense9th of 366 · +10.4
=Even
MD defense34th of 366 · +3.3
TENN defense9th of 366 · +8.2
←TENNSmall
MD offense63rd of 366 · +2.4
Backcourt+8.4 · 3 players
←TENNBig
Backcourt+4.9 · 3 players
Frontcourt+3.1 · 2 players
→MDBig
Frontcourt+11.4 · 2 players
Bench+11.2 · 5 players
←TENNBig
Bench-2.3 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestTENN betterMD betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Harris35 min · TRT. Lundblade35 min · TRD. Dai Ames32 min · TRJ. Haralson27 min · TRT. Hill25 min · TRT. Henderson7 min
Forwards
B. Lue27 min · TRJ. Washington21 min · TRD. Brown15 minC. Fermin13 min · TRC. WashingtonNewR. ScottNew
Centers
M. Rubin30 min · TR
Guards
M. McNair37 min · TRA. Mills27 minB. Boswell27 min · TRD. Wagner24 min · TRM. Jabriel20 minG. Turkson11 min
Forwards
P. Payne27 minT. Buljan26 min · TRR. Jennings13 min · TRA. BrownNewB. OladotunNewA. TambedouNew
Centers
A. K'MedehoutoNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 78.8 #81 | Points per game | 69.7 #291 |
| 1.16 #49 | Points per possession | 1.04 #270 |
| 68.1 #226 | Pace (possessions) | 67.0 #281 |
| Shooting | ||
| 51.4 #174 | Effective FG% | 48.1 #311 |
| 33.4 #201 | 3-point % | 31.7 #293 |
| 32.1 #328 | 3-point attempt rate | 46.9 #35 |
| 37.4 #115 | Free throw rate | 36.4 #142 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.4 #227 | Turnover rate | 18.6 #300 |
| 44.7 #1 | Offensive rebound rate | 33.8 #73 |
| 17.1 #24 | Assists per game | 10.4 #351 |
| Defense | ||
| 69.6 #58 | Points allowed | 76.6 #232 |
| 1.02 #43 | Points allowed per possession | 1.14 #312 |
| 47.8 #37 | Opponent effective FG% | 54.4 #312 |
| 30.5 #21 | Opponent 3-point % | 36.3 #317 |
| 16.1 #215 | Turnovers forced | 14.9 #294 |
| 72.2 #61 | Defensive rebound rate | 70.9 #111 |
| 7.3 #101 | Steals per game | 4.8 #345 |
| 3.7 #114 | Blocks per game | 2.9 #237 |
Tennessee
25-12 in 2025-26 overall · 12-8 in conference · Southeastern Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Michigan62–95
- Wvs Iowa State76–62
- Wvs Virginia79–72
- Wvs Miami OH78–56
- Lvs Vanderbilt68–75
A week or more of rest.
Maryland
12-21 in 2025-26 overall · 5-17 in conference · Big Ten Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Iowa64–75
- Wvs Oregon70–60
- Lvs Illinois72–78
- L@ Wisconsin45–78
- Lvs Rutgers65–69
A week or more of rest.