Food City Center · at Tennessee
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | TENN | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects TENN 87–67 · win probability TENN 96%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 154.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: TENN has more of the edges
FSU 1, TENN 6 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: FSU 30.8%, TENN 44.7%. Defensive: FSU 65.9%, TENN 72.2%
Turnovers
Turnover rate: FSU 15.2%, TENN 17.4%. Forced: FSU 19.0%, TENN 16.1%
Three-pointers
FSU hits 33.1% and allows 34.6%; TENN hits 33.4% and allows 30.5%. Threes are 50.6% and 32.1% of their shots
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: FSU plays 71.8 a game (41st fastest), TENN 68.1 (226th). Faster games mean more points
TENN offense vs FSU defense
Offense 9th of 366 against a defense 98th, on the model’s ratings
Shooting
Effective FG%: FSU 52.3 and allows 52.2; TENN 51.4 and allows 47.8
Context
Schedule so far
FSU has played the 73rd-hardest schedule, TENN the 7th. A record against a soft schedule means less
FSU offense vs TENN defense
Offense 73rd of 366 against a defense 9th, on the model’s ratings
Home court
TENN at home. This season: TENN 0-0 at home, FSU 0-0 away
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: FSU 34.7, TENN 37.4. Allowed: FSU 32.7, TENN 36.3
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: FSU 9%, TENN 13%. Transfers in: FSU 5, TENN 9. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | TENN -20.0 | — |
| Total | — | 154.8 | — |
| Projected score | — | FSU 67.4 · TENN 87.4 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | TENN -11.8 | — |
| 1H total | 72.3 | — |
| 1H projected score | FSU 30.3 · TENN 42 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7-3 70% | 7-3 70% | 7-3 70% | |
| 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Florida St
33 games played
Straight up
18-15
55% wins
Against the spread
20-13
61% covers · avg −0.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-16
52% overs · avg −2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | W 108-76 | -27.5 | W +4.5 | 156.5 | O 184 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 101-64 | -24.5 | W +12.5 | 166.5 | U 165 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 76-78 | +17.5 | W +15.5 | 180.5 | U 154 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 87-73 | -19.5 | L −5.5 | 165.5 | U 160 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 98-72 | -18.5 | W +7.5 | 175.5 | U 170 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 89-59 | -26.5 | W +3.5 | 159.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 59-95 | -1.5 | L −37.5 | 174.5 | U 154 |
| Dec 2 | vs | L 73-107 | -1.5 | L −35.5 | 176.5 | O 180 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 67-82 | +12.5 | L −2.5 | 148.5 | O 149 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 95-103 | -12.5 | L −20.5 | 165.5 | O 198 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 69-97 | +6.5 | L −21.5 | 162.5 | O 166 |
| Dec 19 | vs | W 96-49 | -40.5 | W +6.5 | 164.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 87-63 | -23.5 | W +0.5 | 159.5 | U 150 |
| Dec 30 | @ | L 66-79 | +12.5 | L −0.5 | 166.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 87-91 | +16.5 | W +12.5 | 163.5 | O 178 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 69-113 | +4.5 | L −39.5 | 160.5 | O 182 |
| Jan 13 | @ | L 86-94 | +4.5 | L −3.5 | 160.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 68-69 | +1.5 | W +0.5 | 168.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 20 | @ | W 65-63 | +10.5 | W +12.5 | 163.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 80-83 | +11.5 | W +8.5 | 163.5 | U 163 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 63-61 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 157.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 88-80 | -3.5 | W +4.5 | 152.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 82-79 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 154.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 10 | vs | L 58-61 | +8.5 | W +5.5 | 155.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 92-69 | +4.5 | W +27.5 | 156.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 17 | vs | W 80-72 | -11.5 | L −3.5 | 148.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 70-65 | +8.5 | W +13.5 | 145.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 24 | vs | L 73-83 | +2.5 | L −7.5 | 152.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 80-71 | -5.5 | W +3.5 | 158.5 | U 151 |
| Mar 4 | @ | W 75-74 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 144.5 | O 149 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 91-78 | -1.5 | W +11.5 | 158.5 | O 169 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 95-89 | -1.5 | W +4.5 | 154.5 | O 184 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 79-80 | +16.5 | W +15.5 | 150.5 | O 159 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
ALCN
W 108-76
+4.5
7
vs
ALST
W 101-64
+12.5
11
@
FLA
L 76-78
+15.5
18
vs
UTM
W 87-73
−5.5
21
vs
GASO
W 98-72
+7.5
25
vs
CSUB
W 89-59
+3.5
28
vs
TA&M
L 59-95
−37.5
2
vs
UGA
L 73-107
−35.5
6
vs
HOU
L 67-82
−2.5
13
vs
MASS
L 95-103
−20.5
16
@
DAY
L 69-97
−21.5
19
vs
MVSU
W 96-49
+6.5
22
vs
JAX
W 87-63
+0.5
30
@
UNC
L 66-79
−0.5
3
vs
DUKE
L 87-91
+12.5
10
vs
NCSU
L 69-113
−39.5
13
@
SYR
L 86-94
−3.5
17
vs
WAKE
L 68-69
+0.5
20
@
MIA
W 65-63
+12.5
24
@
SMU
L 80-83
+8.5
28
vs
CAL
W 63-61
−1.5
31
vs
STAN
W 88-80
+4.5
7
@
ND
W 82-79
+4.5
10
vs
UVA
L 58-61
+5.5
14
@
VT
W 92-69
+27.5
17
vs
BC
W 80-72
−3.5
21
@
CLEM
W 70-65
+13.5
24
vs
MIA
L 73-83
−7.5
28
@
GT
W 80-71
+3.5
4
@
PITT
W 75-74
−0.5
7
vs
SMU
W 91-78
+11.5
11
vs
CAL
W 95-89
+4.5
12
vs
DUKE
L 79-80
+15.5
covered 20didn’t cover 13avg −0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
ALCN
W 108-76
+27.5
7
vs
ALST
W 101-64
−1.5
11
@
FLA
L 76-78
−26.5
18
vs
UTM
W 87-73
−5.5
21
vs
GASO
W 98-72
−5.5
25
vs
CSUB
W 89-59
−11.5
28
vs
TA&M
L 59-95
−20.5
2
vs
UGA
L 73-107
+3.5
6
vs
HOU
L 67-82
+0.5
13
vs
MASS
L 95-103
+32.5
16
@
DAY
L 69-97
+3.5
19
vs
MVSU
W 96-49
−19.5
22
vs
JAX
W 87-63
−9.5
30
@
UNC
L 66-79
−21.5
3
vs
DUKE
L 87-91
+14.5
10
vs
NCSU
L 69-113
+21.5
13
@
SYR
L 86-94
+19.5
17
vs
WAKE
L 68-69
−31.5
20
@
MIA
W 65-63
−35.5
24
@
SMU
L 80-83
−0.5
28
vs
CAL
W 63-61
−33.5
31
vs
STAN
W 88-80
+15.5
7
@
ND
W 82-79
+6.5
10
vs
UVA
L 58-61
−36.5
14
@
VT
W 92-69
+4.5
17
vs
BC
W 80-72
+3.5
21
@
CLEM
W 70-65
−10.5
24
vs
MIA
L 73-83
+3.5
28
@
GT
W 80-71
−7.5
4
@
PITT
W 75-74
+4.5
7
vs
SMU
W 91-78
+10.5
11
vs
CAL
W 95-89
+29.5
12
vs
DUKE
L 79-80
+8.5
over 17under 16avg −2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Tennessee
37 games played
Straight up
25-12
68% wins
Against the spread
17-20
46% covers · avg −1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
18-19
49% overs · avg +0.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 76-61 | -28.5 | L −13.5 | 143.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 95-56 | -27.5 | W +11.5 | 137.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 99-66 | -41.5 | L −8.5 | 155.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 17 | vs | W 91-66 | -26.5 | L −1.5 | 143.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 89-60 | -31.5 | L −2.5 | 157.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 85-60 | -14.5 | W +10.5 | 141.5 | O 145 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 76-73 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 136.5 | O 149 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 76-81 | -7.5 | L −12.5 | 140.5 | O 157 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 60-62 | -7.5 | L −9.5 | 147.5 | U 122 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 62-75 | -1.5 | L −14.5 | 149.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 83-62 | -4.5 | W +16.5 | 156.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 94-52 | -42.5 | L −0.5 | 152.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 30 | vs | W 105-54 | -44.5 | W +6.5 | 147.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 75-86 | -1.5 | L −12.5 | 158.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 6 | vs | W 85-71 | -12.5 | W +1.5 | 153.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 67-91 | +4.5 | L −19.5 | 151.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 13 | vs | W 87-82 | -11.5 | L −6.5 | 159.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 78-80 | -6.5 | L −8.5 | 145.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 79-73 | +4.5 | W +10.5 | 167.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 86-85 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 157.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 77-69 | -5.5 | W +2.5 | 147.5 | U 146 |
| Feb 3 | vs | W 84-66 | -12.5 | W +5.5 | 139.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 71-74 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 147.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 73-64 | -8.5 | W +0.5 | 147.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 73-63 | -14.5 | L −4.5 | 143.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 89-66 | -11.5 | W +11.5 | 149.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 69-65 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 150.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 24 | @ | L 69-73 | -3.5 | L −7.5 | 143.5 | U 142 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 69-71 | -5.5 | L −7.5 | 162.5 | U 140 |
| Mar 3 | @ | W 78-59 | -10.5 | W +8.5 | 141.5 | U 137 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 82-86 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 146.5 | O 168 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 72-62 | -5.5 | W +4.5 | 144.5 | U 134 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 68-75 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 147.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 20 | vs | W 78-56 | -12.5 | W +9.5 | 148.5 | U 134 |
| Mar 22 | vs | W 79-72 | -1.5 | W +5.5 | 137.5 | O 151 |
| Mar 27 | vs | W 76-62 | +2.5 | W +16.5 | 139.5 | U 138 |
| Mar 29 | vs | L 62-95 | +8.5 | L −24.5 | 146.5 | O 157 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
MER
W 76-61
−13.5
8
vs
NKU
W 95-56
+11.5
12
vs
UNF
W 99-66
−8.5
17
vs
RICE
W 91-66
−1.5
20
vs
TNST
W 89-60
−2.5
24
vs
RUTG
W 85-60
+10.5
25
vs
HOU
W 76-73
+5.5
26
vs
KU
L 76-81
−12.5
2
@
SYR
L 60-62
−9.5
6
vs
ILL
L 62-75
−14.5
16
vs
LOU
W 83-62
+16.5
21
vs
GWEB
W 94-52
−0.5
30
vs
SCST
W 105-54
+6.5
3
@
ARK
L 75-86
−12.5
6
vs
TEX
W 85-71
+1.5
10
@
FLA
L 67-91
−19.5
13
vs
TA&M
W 87-82
−6.5
17
vs
UK
L 78-80
−8.5
24
@
ALA
W 79-73
+10.5
28
@
UGA
W 86-85
−0.5
31
vs
AUB
W 77-69
+2.5
3
vs
MISS
W 84-66
+5.5
7
@
UK
L 71-74
−1.5
11
@
MSST
W 73-64
+0.5
14
vs
LSU
W 73-63
−4.5
18
vs
OU
W 89-66
+11.5
21
@
VAN
W 69-65
+6.5
24
@
MIZ
L 69-73
−7.5
28
vs
ALA
L 69-71
−7.5
3
@
SC
W 78-59
+8.5
7
vs
VAN
L 82-86
−6.5
12
vs
AUB
W 72-62
+4.5
13
vs
VAN
L 68-75
−8.5
20
vs
M-OH
W 78-56
+9.5
22
vs
UVA
W 79-72
+5.5
27
vs
ISU
W 76-62
+16.5
29
vs
MICH
L 62-95
−24.5
covered 17didn’t cover 20avg −1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
MER
W 76-61
−6.5
8
vs
NKU
W 95-56
+13.5
12
vs
UNF
W 99-66
+9.5
17
vs
RICE
W 91-66
+13.5
20
vs
TNST
W 89-60
−8.5
24
vs
RUTG
W 85-60
+3.5
25
vs
HOU
W 76-73
+12.5
26
vs
KU
L 76-81
+16.5
2
@
SYR
L 60-62
−25.5
6
vs
ILL
L 62-75
−12.5
16
vs
LOU
W 83-62
−11.5
21
vs
GWEB
W 94-52
−6.5
30
vs
SCST
W 105-54
+11.5
3
@
ARK
L 75-86
+2.5
6
vs
TEX
W 85-71
+2.5
10
@
FLA
L 67-91
+6.5
13
vs
TA&M
W 87-82
+9.5
17
vs
UK
L 78-80
+12.5
24
@
ALA
W 79-73
−15.5
28
@
UGA
W 86-85
+13.5
31
vs
AUB
W 77-69
−1.5
3
vs
MISS
W 84-66
+10.5
7
@
UK
L 71-74
−2.5
11
@
MSST
W 73-64
−10.5
14
vs
LSU
W 73-63
−7.5
18
vs
OU
W 89-66
+5.5
21
@
VAN
W 69-65
−16.5
24
@
MIZ
L 69-73
−1.5
28
vs
ALA
L 69-71
−22.5
3
@
SC
W 78-59
−4.5
7
vs
VAN
L 82-86
+21.5
12
vs
AUB
W 72-62
−10.5
13
vs
VAN
L 68-75
−4.5
20
vs
M-OH
W 78-56
−14.5
22
vs
UVA
W 79-72
+13.5
27
vs
ISU
W 76-62
−1.5
29
vs
MICH
L 62-95
+10.5
over 18under 19avg +0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Tennessee has the better starters
Position by position: Florida St 0, Tennessee 2, even 3
Florida StBetterTennessee
G K. Taylor TR19.8 pts · 5 reb · 2.9 ast
Score 90
=Even
G J. Harris TR21.4 pts · 6.5 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 99
G A. Robinson TR8.9 pts · 3.1 reb · 3 ast
Score 73
=Even
G T. Lundblade TR15.8 pts · 2.6 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 63
F S. Rancik TR12.3 pts · 5.6 reb · 2 ast
Score 82
=Even
G D. Dai Ames TR17 pts · 2 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 83
F C. Schwieger TR5.1 pts · 2.5 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 32
→TENNSmall
F B. Lue TR10.9 pts · 5.1 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 53
F S. Abaev TR7 pts · 2.9 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 68
→TENNSmall
C M. Rubin TR11.3 pts · 7.1 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 83
Florida StBetterTennessee
FSU offense73rd of 366 · +1.4
→TENNSmall
TENN defense9th of 366 · +8.2
FSU defense98th of 366 · -0.7
→TENNSmall
TENN offense9th of 366 · +10.4
Backcourt+3.7 · 2 players
→TENNBig
Backcourt+8.4 · 3 players
Frontcourt+1.4 · 3 players
→TENNSmall
Frontcourt+3.1 · 2 players
Bench-0.2 · 2 players
→TENNBig
Bench+11.2 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestFSU betterTENN betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
K. Taylor36 min · TRA. Robinson27 min · TRJ. Crawford1 minJ. LopezNewA. RobinsonNewB. BassNew
Forwards
S. Rancik28 min · TRC. Schwieger20 min · TRS. Abaev16 min · TRA. Swinton16 minC. PaulNew
Centers
M. PonderNew
Guards
J. Harris35 min · TRT. Lundblade35 min · TRD. Dai Ames32 min · TRJ. Haralson27 min · TRT. Hill25 min · TRT. Henderson7 min
Forwards
B. Lue27 min · TRJ. Washington21 min · TRD. Brown15 minC. Fermin13 min · TRC. WashingtonNewR. ScottNew
Centers
M. Rubin30 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 80.4 #58 | Points per game | 78.8 #81 |
| 1.12 #101 | Points per possession | 1.16 #49 |
| 71.8 #41 | Pace (possessions) | 68.1 #226 |
| Shooting | ||
| 52.3 #132 | Effective FG% | 51.4 #174 |
| 33.1 #226 | 3-point % | 33.4 #201 |
| 50.6 #13 | 3-point attempt rate | 32.1 #328 |
| 34.7 #191 | Free throw rate | 37.4 #115 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.2 #80 | Turnover rate | 17.4 #227 |
| 30.8 #170 | Offensive rebound rate | 44.7 #1 |
| 14.3 #124 | Assists per game | 17.1 #24 |
| Defense | ||
| 77.9 #264 | Points allowed | 69.6 #58 |
| 1.08 #178 | Points allowed per possession | 1.02 #43 |
| 52.2 #226 | Opponent effective FG% | 47.8 #37 |
| 34.6 #228 | Opponent 3-point % | 30.5 #21 |
| 19.0 #51 | Turnovers forced | 16.1 #215 |
| 65.9 #319 | Defensive rebound rate | 72.2 #61 |
| 7.9 #44 | Steals per game | 7.3 #101 |
| 3.9 #84 | Blocks per game | 3.7 #114 |
Florida St
18-15 in 2025-26 overall · 11-9 in conference · Atlantic Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Duke79–80
- Wvs California95–89
- Wvs SMU91–78
- W@ Pitt75–74
- W@ Georgia Tech80–71
A week or more of rest.
Tennessee
25-12 in 2025-26 overall · 12-8 in conference · Southeastern Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Michigan62–95
- Wvs Iowa State76–62
- Wvs Virginia79–72
- Wvs Miami OH78–56
- Lvs Vanderbilt68–75
A week or more of rest.