John Paul Jones Arena · at Virginia
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | UVA | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects UVA 94–57 · win probability UVA 100%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 150.0
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: UVA has more of the edges
L-MD 0, UVA 7 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
L-MD offense vs UVA defense
Offense 307th of 366 against a defense 13th, on the model’s ratings
UVA offense vs L-MD defense
Offense 32nd of 366 against a defense 313th, on the model’s ratings
Shooting
Effective FG%: L-MD 50.4 and allows 54.7; UVA 54.6 and allows 45.8
Context
Schedule so far
L-MD has played the 299th-hardest schedule, UVA the 68th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Three-pointers
L-MD hits 32.5% and allows 32.8%; UVA hits 36.3% and allows 31.6%. Threes are 47.2% and 46.7% of their shots
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: L-MD 27.6%, UVA 37.9%. Defensive: L-MD 71.0%, UVA 70.8%
Home court
UVA at home. This season: UVA 0-0 at home, L-MD 0-0 away
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: L-MD 33%, UVA 57%. Transfers in: L-MD 5, UVA 3. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: L-MD plays 69.3 a game (165th fastest), UVA 67.6 (247th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: L-MD 29.9, UVA 32.3. Allowed: L-MD 32.7, UVA 32.9
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: L-MD 15.4%, UVA 16.0%. Forced: L-MD 15.4%, UVA 15.4%
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | UVA -37.0 | — |
| Total | — | 150.0 | — |
| Projected score | — | L-MD 56.5 · UVA 93.5 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | UVA -21.9 | — |
| 1H total | 70.2 | — |
| 1H projected score | L-MD 24.1 · UVA 46 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | 7-3 70% | |
| 7-3 70% | 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Loyola MD
30 games played
Straight up
10-20
33% wins
Against the spread
16-14
53% covers · avg −0.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-13
57% overs · avg +4.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | L 56-67 | +8.5 | L −2.5 | 141.5 | U 123 |
| Nov 11 | vs | L 64-66 | -10.5 | L −12.5 | 139.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 74-63 | -6.5 | W +4.5 | 138.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 16 | @ | L 82-85 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 135.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 78-92 | +14.5 | W +0.5 | 150.5 | O 170 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 46-88 | +35.5 | L −6.5 | 159.5 | U 134 |
| Nov 30 | vs | W 95-84 | -9.5 | W +1.5 | 143.5 | O 179 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 71-93 | +6.5 | L −15.5 | 142.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 9 | @ | L 70-86 | -2.5 | L −18.5 | 151.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 73-81 | +2.5 | L −5.5 | 151.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 79-86 | +23.5 | W +16.5 | 146.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 31 | @ | L 69-84 | +8.5 | L −6.5 | 154.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 64-79 | +1.5 | L −13.5 | 152.5 | U 143 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 84-76 | +4.5 | W +12.5 | 146.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 67-70 | +6.5 | W +3.5 | 143.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 80-86 | +8.5 | W +2.5 | 150.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 74-57 | +1.5 | W +18.5 | 148.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 19 | @ | L 81-88 | +3.5 | L −3.5 | 149.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 67-62 | -2.5 | W +2.5 | 147.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 77-68 | +4.5 | W +13.5 | 147.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 71-87 | +9.5 | L −6.5 | 143.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 89-84 | -2.5 | W +2.5 | 149.5 | O 173 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 69-78 | +5.5 | L −3.5 | 145.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 68-54 | +3.5 | W +17.5 | 147.5 | U 122 |
| Feb 15 | vs | W 83-73 | -4.5 | W +5.5 | 146.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 77-87 | -4.5 | L −14.5 | 149.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 98-101 | +8.5 | W +5.5 | 150.5 | O 199 |
| Feb 25 | vs | L 51-78 | +6.5 | L −20.5 | 147.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 76-62 | +1.5 | W +15.5 | 151.5 | U 138 |
| Mar 5 | @ | L 77-90 | +6.5 | L −6.5 | 155.5 | O 167 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
TOW
L 56-67
−2.5
11
vs
NJIT
L 64-66
−12.5
15
vs
STO
W 74-63
+4.5
16
@
FAIR
L 82-85
+2.5
19
@
DUQ
L 78-92
+0.5
21
@
UK
L 46-88
−6.5
30
vs
COPP
W 95-84
+1.5
3
@
HAMP
L 71-93
−15.5
9
@
VMI
L 70-86
−18.5
13
vs
MSM
L 73-81
−5.5
21
@
GMU
L 79-86
+16.5
31
@
AMER
L 69-84
−6.5
3
vs
LAF
L 64-79
−13.5
7
@
ARMY
W 84-76
+12.5
10
@
BUCK
L 67-70
+3.5
14
vs
COLG
L 80-86
+2.5
17
vs
BU
W 74-57
+18.5
19
@
LEH
L 81-88
−3.5
24
vs
BUCK
W 67-62
+2.5
28
vs
AMER
W 77-68
+13.5
31
@
NAVY
L 71-87
−6.5
4
vs
LEH
W 89-84
+2.5
7
@
BU
L 69-78
−3.5
11
@
LAF
W 68-54
+17.5
15
vs
HC
W 83-73
+5.5
18
vs
ARMY
L 77-87
−14.5
21
@
COLG
L 98-101
+5.5
25
vs
NAVY
L 51-78
−20.5
28
@
HC
W 76-62
+15.5
5
@
COLG
L 77-90
−6.5
covered 16didn’t cover 14avg −0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
TOW
L 56-67
−18.5
11
vs
NJIT
L 64-66
−9.5
15
vs
STO
W 74-63
−1.5
16
@
FAIR
L 82-85
+31.5
19
@
DUQ
L 78-92
+19.5
21
@
UK
L 46-88
−25.5
30
vs
COPP
W 95-84
+35.5
3
@
HAMP
L 71-93
+21.5
9
@
VMI
L 70-86
+4.5
13
vs
MSM
L 73-81
+2.5
21
@
GMU
L 79-86
+18.5
31
@
AMER
L 69-84
−1.5
3
vs
LAF
L 64-79
−9.5
7
@
ARMY
W 84-76
+13.5
10
@
BUCK
L 67-70
−6.5
14
vs
COLG
L 80-86
+15.5
17
vs
BU
W 74-57
−17.5
19
@
LEH
L 81-88
+19.5
24
vs
BUCK
W 67-62
−18.5
28
vs
AMER
W 77-68
−2.5
31
@
NAVY
L 71-87
+14.5
4
vs
LEH
W 89-84
+23.5
7
@
BU
L 69-78
+1.5
11
@
LAF
W 68-54
−25.5
15
vs
HC
W 83-73
+9.5
18
vs
ARMY
L 77-87
+14.5
21
@
COLG
L 98-101
+48.5
25
vs
NAVY
L 51-78
−18.5
28
@
HC
W 76-62
−13.5
5
@
COLG
L 77-90
+11.5
over 17under 13avg +4.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Virginia
36 games played
Straight up
30-6
83% wins
Against the spread
18-18
50% covers · avg +0.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-20
44% overs · avg +0.4 pts vs the total
Against the spread
18-1850%
2 straight misses ATS2 of last 4 covered
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 87-53 | -26.5 | W +7.5 | 148.5 | U 140 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 81-62 | -34.5 | L −15.5 | 151.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 91-53 | -24.5 | W +13.5 | 148.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 104-78 | -20.5 | W +5.5 | 155.5 | O 182 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 83-78 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 149.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 23 | vs | L 73-80 | -6.5 | L −13.5 | 155.5 | U 153 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 94-69 | -25.5 | L −0.5 | 160.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 3 | @ | W 88-69 | +3.5 | W +22.5 | 154.5 | O 157 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 86-73 | -5.5 | W +7.5 | 147.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 9 | vs | W 84-60 | -36.5 | L −12.5 | 134.5 | O 144 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 80-72 | -16.5 | L −8.5 | 153.5 | U 152 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 95-51 | -27.5 | W +16.5 | 153.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 31 | @ | L 85-95 | -5.5 | L −15.5 | 153.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 76-61 | +4.5 | W +19.5 | 151.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 84-60 | -14.5 | W +9.5 | 148.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 70-55 | -12.5 | W +2.5 | 143.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 13 | @ | W 79-70 | +4.5 | W +13.5 | 154.5 | U 149 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 72-68 | -2.5 | W +1.5 | 153.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 80-85 | -6.5 | L −11.5 | 152.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 27 | @ | W 100-97 | -9.5 | L −6.5 | 145.5 | O 197 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 73-66 | -13.5 | L −6.5 | 141.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 3 | vs | W 67-47 | -12.5 | W +7.5 | 142.5 | U 114 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 72-59 | -13.5 | L −0.5 | 147.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 10 | @ | W 61-58 | -8.5 | L −5.5 | 155.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 70-66 | -5.5 | L −1.5 | 146.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 94-68 | -13.5 | W +12.5 | 150.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 86-83 | -7.5 | L −4.5 | 145.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 24 | vs | W 90-61 | -6.5 | W +22.5 | 151.5 | U 151 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 51-77 | +9.5 | L −16.5 | 143.5 | U 128 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 75-70 | -14.5 | L −9.5 | 150.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 76-72 | -11.5 | L −7.5 | 145.5 | O 148 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 81-74 | -6.5 | W +0.5 | 153.5 | O 155 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 84-62 | -3.5 | W +18.5 | 146.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 14 | vs | L 70-74 | +6.5 | W +2.5 | 140.5 | O 144 |
| Mar 20 | vs | W 82-73 | -17.5 | L −8.5 | 146.5 | O 155 |
| Mar 22 | vs | L 72-79 | +1.5 | L −5.5 | 137.5 | O 151 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
RID
W 87-53
+7.5
7
vs
NCCU
W 81-62
−15.5
11
vs
HAMP
W 91-53
+13.5
15
vs
MRSH
W 104-78
+5.5
21
vs
NU
W 83-78
+0.5
23
vs
BTLR
L 73-80
−13.5
28
vs
QUC
W 94-69
−0.5
3
@
TEX
W 88-69
+22.5
6
vs
DAY
W 86-73
+7.5
9
vs
UMES
W 84-60
−12.5
20
vs
MD
W 80-72
−8.5
22
vs
AMER
W 95-51
+16.5
31
@
VT
L 85-95
−15.5
3
@
NCSU
W 76-61
+19.5
7
vs
CAL
W 84-60
+9.5
10
vs
STAN
W 70-55
+2.5
13
@
LOU
W 79-70
+13.5
17
@
SMU
W 72-68
+1.5
24
vs
UNC
L 80-85
−11.5
27
@
ND
W 100-97
−6.5
31
@
BC
W 73-66
−6.5
3
vs
PITT
W 67-47
+7.5
7
vs
SYR
W 72-59
−0.5
10
@
FSU
W 61-58
−5.5
14
vs
OSU
W 70-66
−1.5
18
@
GT
W 94-68
+12.5
21
vs
MIA
W 86-83
−4.5
24
vs
NCSU
W 90-61
+22.5
28
@
DUKE
L 51-77
−16.5
3
vs
WAKE
W 75-70
−9.5
7
vs
VT
W 76-72
−7.5
12
vs
NCSU
W 81-74
+0.5
13
vs
MIA
W 84-62
+18.5
14
vs
DUKE
L 70-74
+2.5
20
vs
WRST
W 82-73
−8.5
22
vs
TENN
L 72-79
−5.5
covered 18didn’t cover 18avg +0.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
RID
W 87-53
−8.5
7
vs
NCCU
W 81-62
−8.5
11
vs
HAMP
W 91-53
−4.5
15
vs
MRSH
W 104-78
+26.5
21
vs
NU
W 83-78
+11.5
23
vs
BTLR
L 73-80
−2.5
28
vs
QUC
W 94-69
+2.5
3
@
TEX
W 88-69
+2.5
6
vs
DAY
W 86-73
+11.5
9
vs
UMES
W 84-60
+9.5
20
vs
MD
W 80-72
−1.5
22
vs
AMER
W 95-51
−7.5
31
@
VT
L 85-95
+26.5
3
@
NCSU
W 76-61
−14.5
7
vs
CAL
W 84-60
−4.5
10
vs
STAN
W 70-55
−18.5
13
@
LOU
W 79-70
−5.5
17
@
SMU
W 72-68
−13.5
24
vs
UNC
L 80-85
+12.5
27
@
ND
W 100-97
+51.5
31
@
BC
W 73-66
−2.5
3
vs
PITT
W 67-47
−28.5
7
vs
SYR
W 72-59
−16.5
10
@
FSU
W 61-58
−36.5
14
vs
OSU
W 70-66
−10.5
18
@
GT
W 94-68
+11.5
21
vs
MIA
W 86-83
+23.5
24
vs
NCSU
W 90-61
−0.5
28
@
DUKE
L 51-77
−15.5
3
vs
WAKE
W 75-70
−5.5
7
vs
VT
W 76-72
+2.5
12
vs
NCSU
W 81-74
+1.5
13
vs
MIA
W 84-62
−0.5
14
vs
DUKE
L 70-74
+3.5
20
vs
WRST
W 82-73
+8.5
22
vs
TENN
L 72-79
+13.5
over 16under 20avg +0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Virginia has the better starters
Position by position: Loyola MD 0, Virginia 4, even 1
Loyola MDBetterVirginia
G T. Cicero5.4 pts · 2.2 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 53
→UVASmall
G J. Dixon TR15.7 pts · 3.7 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 82
G C. Berg-McLean3.5 pts · 2.3 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 21
→UVABig
G J. Vide TR12 pts · 3.1 reb · 4 ast
Score 66
F S. Springer4.4 pts · 2 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 4
→UVABig
G C. Harmon TR13.2 pts · 3.7 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 73
F S. Emenalo3.1 pts · 3.1 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 11
→UVABig
G S. Lewis10.6 pts · 3.6 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 77
F D. Harrison TR2.6 pts · 1.8 reb · 0 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F T. De Ridder15.6 pts · 6.2 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 95
Loyola MDBetterVirginia
L-MD offense307th of 366 · -9.5
→UVABig
UVA defense13th of 366 · +6.6
L-MD defense313th of 366 · -8.1
→UVABig
UVA offense32nd of 366 · +5.9
Backcourt-1.4 · 2 players
→UVABig
Backcourt+3.7 · 4 players
Frontcourt-4.7 · 3 players
→UVABig
Frontcourt+4.2 · 1 player
Bench-3.1 · 5 players
→UVABig
Bench+3.8 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestL-MD betterUVA betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
T. Cicero14 minC. Berg-McLean14 minM. Ortega8 min · TRL. RickettsNewR. LongNewS. BiegNew
Forwards
S. Springer17 minS. Emenalo15 minD. Harrison12 min · TRE. Barnes8 minM. Hagedorn7 min · TRA. Huguet7 min · TR
Guards
J. Dixon31 min · TRJ. Vide29 min · TRC. Harmon28 min · TRS. Lewis26 minC. Mallory24 minE. Gertrude6 min
Forwards
T. De Ridder28 minC. Lang2 minK. AnyaNewS. BarksdaleNewN. AdekunleNew
Centers
J. Grunloh21 minF. IbeNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 73.7 #212 | Points per game | 80.4 #57 |
| 1.06 #227 | Points per possession | 1.19 #21 |
| 69.3 #165 | Pace (possessions) | 67.6 #247 |
| Shooting | ||
| 50.4 #219 | Effective FG% | 54.6 #49 |
| 32.5 #251 | 3-point % | 36.3 #48 |
| 47.2 #30 | 3-point attempt rate | 46.7 #36 |
| 29.9 #312 | Free throw rate | 32.3 #253 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.4 #101 | Turnover rate | 16.0 #141 |
| 27.6 #279 | Offensive rebound rate | 37.9 #9 |
| 12.6 #246 | Assists per game | 16.3 #41 |
| Defense | ||
| 78.5 #280 | Points allowed | 68.8 #46 |
| 1.14 #304 | Points allowed per possession | 1.02 #39 |
| 54.7 #321 | Opponent effective FG% | 45.8 #8 |
| 32.8 #106 | Opponent 3-point % | 31.6 #46 |
| 15.4 #261 | Turnovers forced | 15.4 #256 |
| 71.0 #103 | Defensive rebound rate | 70.8 #120 |
| 6.1 #221 | Steals per game | 6.3 #199 |
| 3.4 #156 | Blocks per game | 6.4 #1 |
Loyola MD
10-20 in 2025-26 overall · 8-11 in conference · Patriot League
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Colgate77–90
- W@ Holy Cross76–62
- Lvs Navy51–78
- L@ Colgate98–101
- Lvs Army77–87
A week or more of rest.
Virginia
30-6 in 2025-26 overall · 17-4 in conference · Atlantic Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Tennessee72–79
- Wvs Wright St82–73
- Lvs Duke70–74
- Wvs Miami84–62
- Wvs NC State81–74
A week or more of rest.