Food City Center · at Tennessee
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | TENN | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects TENN 93–56 · win probability TENN 100%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 148.9
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: TENN has more of the edges
CCU 0, TENN 6 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Schedule so far
CCU has played the 301st-hardest schedule, TENN the 7th. A record against a soft schedule means less
CCU offense vs TENN defense
Offense 295th of 366 against a defense 9th, on the model’s ratings
TENN offense vs CCU defense
Offense 9th of 366 against a defense 246th, on the model’s ratings
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: CCU 26.9%, TENN 44.7%. Defensive: CCU 72.4%, TENN 72.2%
Shooting
Effective FG%: CCU 47.9 and allows 46.8; TENN 51.4 and allows 47.8
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: CCU plays 69.9 a game (121st fastest), TENN 68.1 (226th). Faster games mean more points
Home court
TENN at home. This season: TENN 0-0 at home, CCU 0-0 away
Free throws
Free throw rate: CCU 32.3, TENN 37.4. Allowed: CCU 34.9, TENN 36.3
Even
Three-pointers
CCU hits 33.5% and allows 32.8%; TENN hits 33.4% and allows 30.5%. Threes are 43.1% and 32.1% of their shots
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: CCU 21%, TENN 13%. Transfers in: CCU 6, TENN 9. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: CCU 15.3%, TENN 17.4%. Forced: CCU 12.3%, TENN 16.1%
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | TENN -37.1 | — |
| Total | — | 148.9 | — |
| Projected score | — | CCU 55.9 · TENN 93 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | TENN -22.0 | — |
| 1H total | 69.6 | — |
| 1H projected score | CCU 23.8 · TENN 45.8 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% | |
| 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Coastal
31 games played
Straight up
18-13
58% wins
Against the spread
18-13
58% covers · avg +0.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-14
55% overs · avg −0.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 71-76 | +2.5 | L −2.5 | 146.5 | O 147 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 72-66 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 165.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 67-74 | +7.5 | W +0.5 | 139.5 | O 141 |
| Nov 21 | @ | W 84-64 | -3.5 | W +16.5 | 138.5 | O 148 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 75-58 | -3.5 | W +13.5 | 147.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 23 | @ | L 42-94 | +12.5 | L −39.5 | 146.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 30 | vs | W 67-60 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 140.5 | U 127 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 78-85 | +2.5 | L −4.5 | 144.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 88-84 | +16.5 | W +20.5 | 153.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 61-82 | +17.5 | L −3.5 | 143.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 18 | @ | L 49-67 | +4.5 | L −13.5 | 137.5 | U 116 |
| Dec 20 | @ | W 76-74 | +3.5 | W +5.5 | 147.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 22 | @ | W 68-62 | +7.5 | W +13.5 | 144.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 1 | vs | L 81-82 | -1.5 | L −2.5 | 157.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 71-89 | -6.5 | L −24.5 | 148.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 8 | vs | L 66-70 | -4.5 | L −8.5 | 151.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 67-62 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 133.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 85-83 | +9.5 | W +11.5 | 151.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 79-75 | +6.5 | W +10.5 | 157.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 72-70 | -1.5 | W +0.5 | 140.5 | O 142 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 85-67 | -2.5 | W +15.5 | 141.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 48-53 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 139.5 | U 101 |
| Feb 1 | @ | W 83-79 | -10.5 | L −6.5 | 146.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 66-70 | +4.5 | W +0.5 | 151.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 94-91 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 147.5 | O 185 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 69-65 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 132.5 | O 134 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 65-67 | +1.5 | L −0.5 | 140.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 79-75 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 153.5 | O 154 |
| Feb 24 | @ | W 76-71 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 141.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 27 | @ | W 69-68 | +6.5 | W +7.5 | 141.5 | U 137 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 72-96 | -1.5 | L −25.5 | 151.5 | O 168 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
WMU
L 71-76
−2.5
11
vs
WIN
W 72-66
+8.5
14
@
JXST
L 67-74
+0.5
21
@
WIU
W 84-64
+16.5
22
vs
UND
W 75-58
+13.5
23
@
ILST
L 42-94
−39.5
30
vs
AAMU
W 67-60
−0.5
3
@
UPST
L 78-85
−4.5
6
@
WIN
W 88-84
+20.5
13
@
GCU
L 61-82
−3.5
18
@
APP
L 49-67
−13.5
20
@
ODU
W 76-74
+5.5
22
@
JOES
W 68-62
+13.5
1
vs
GASO
L 81-82
−2.5
3
vs
GAST
L 71-89
−24.5
8
vs
ODU
L 66-70
−8.5
10
vs
APP
W 67-62
+6.5
14
@
MRSH
W 85-83
+11.5
17
@
GASO
W 79-75
+10.5
22
vs
TXST
W 72-70
+0.5
24
vs
USM
W 85-67
+15.5
29
@
USA
L 48-53
−1.5
1
@
ULM
W 83-79
−6.5
4
vs
ARST
L 66-70
+0.5
7
vs
MASS
W 94-91
+5.5
12
@
UL
W 69-65
+2.5
18
vs
JMU
L 65-67
−0.5
21
vs
MRSH
W 79-75
+6.5
24
@
GAST
W 76-71
+3.5
27
@
JMU
W 69-68
+7.5
7
vs
GASO
L 72-96
−25.5
covered 18didn’t cover 13avg +0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
WMU
L 71-76
+0.5
11
vs
WIN
W 72-66
−27.5
14
@
JXST
L 67-74
+1.5
21
@
WIU
W 84-64
+9.5
22
vs
UND
W 75-58
−14.5
23
@
ILST
L 42-94
−10.5
30
vs
AAMU
W 67-60
−13.5
3
@
UPST
L 78-85
+18.5
6
@
WIN
W 88-84
+18.5
13
@
GCU
L 61-82
−0.5
18
@
APP
L 49-67
−21.5
20
@
ODU
W 76-74
+2.5
22
@
JOES
W 68-62
−14.5
1
vs
GASO
L 81-82
+5.5
3
vs
GAST
L 71-89
+11.5
8
vs
ODU
L 66-70
−15.5
10
vs
APP
W 67-62
−4.5
14
@
MRSH
W 85-83
+16.5
17
@
GASO
W 79-75
−3.5
22
vs
TXST
W 72-70
+1.5
24
vs
USM
W 85-67
+10.5
29
@
USA
L 48-53
−38.5
1
@
ULM
W 83-79
+15.5
4
vs
ARST
L 66-70
−15.5
7
vs
MASS
W 94-91
+37.5
12
@
UL
W 69-65
+1.5
18
vs
JMU
L 65-67
−8.5
21
vs
MRSH
W 79-75
+0.5
24
@
GAST
W 76-71
+5.5
27
@
JMU
W 69-68
−4.5
7
vs
GASO
L 72-96
+16.5
over 17under 14avg −0.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Tennessee
37 games played
Straight up
25-12
68% wins
Against the spread
17-20
46% covers · avg −1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
18-19
49% overs · avg +0.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 76-61 | -28.5 | L −13.5 | 143.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 95-56 | -27.5 | W +11.5 | 137.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 99-66 | -41.5 | L −8.5 | 155.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 17 | vs | W 91-66 | -26.5 | L −1.5 | 143.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 89-60 | -31.5 | L −2.5 | 157.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 85-60 | -14.5 | W +10.5 | 141.5 | O 145 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 76-73 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 136.5 | O 149 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 76-81 | -7.5 | L −12.5 | 140.5 | O 157 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 60-62 | -7.5 | L −9.5 | 147.5 | U 122 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 62-75 | -1.5 | L −14.5 | 149.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 83-62 | -4.5 | W +16.5 | 156.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 94-52 | -42.5 | L −0.5 | 152.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 30 | vs | W 105-54 | -44.5 | W +6.5 | 147.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 75-86 | -1.5 | L −12.5 | 158.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 6 | vs | W 85-71 | -12.5 | W +1.5 | 153.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 67-91 | +4.5 | L −19.5 | 151.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 13 | vs | W 87-82 | -11.5 | L −6.5 | 159.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 78-80 | -6.5 | L −8.5 | 145.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 79-73 | +4.5 | W +10.5 | 167.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 86-85 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 157.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 77-69 | -5.5 | W +2.5 | 147.5 | U 146 |
| Feb 3 | vs | W 84-66 | -12.5 | W +5.5 | 139.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 71-74 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 147.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 73-64 | -8.5 | W +0.5 | 147.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 73-63 | -14.5 | L −4.5 | 143.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 89-66 | -11.5 | W +11.5 | 149.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 69-65 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 150.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 24 | @ | L 69-73 | -3.5 | L −7.5 | 143.5 | U 142 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 69-71 | -5.5 | L −7.5 | 162.5 | U 140 |
| Mar 3 | @ | W 78-59 | -10.5 | W +8.5 | 141.5 | U 137 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 82-86 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 146.5 | O 168 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 72-62 | -5.5 | W +4.5 | 144.5 | U 134 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 68-75 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 147.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 20 | vs | W 78-56 | -12.5 | W +9.5 | 148.5 | U 134 |
| Mar 22 | vs | W 79-72 | -1.5 | W +5.5 | 137.5 | O 151 |
| Mar 27 | vs | W 76-62 | +2.5 | W +16.5 | 139.5 | U 138 |
| Mar 29 | vs | L 62-95 | +8.5 | L −24.5 | 146.5 | O 157 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
MER
W 76-61
−13.5
8
vs
NKU
W 95-56
+11.5
12
vs
UNF
W 99-66
−8.5
17
vs
RICE
W 91-66
−1.5
20
vs
TNST
W 89-60
−2.5
24
vs
RUTG
W 85-60
+10.5
25
vs
HOU
W 76-73
+5.5
26
vs
KU
L 76-81
−12.5
2
@
SYR
L 60-62
−9.5
6
vs
ILL
L 62-75
−14.5
16
vs
LOU
W 83-62
+16.5
21
vs
GWEB
W 94-52
−0.5
30
vs
SCST
W 105-54
+6.5
3
@
ARK
L 75-86
−12.5
6
vs
TEX
W 85-71
+1.5
10
@
FLA
L 67-91
−19.5
13
vs
TA&M
W 87-82
−6.5
17
vs
UK
L 78-80
−8.5
24
@
ALA
W 79-73
+10.5
28
@
UGA
W 86-85
−0.5
31
vs
AUB
W 77-69
+2.5
3
vs
MISS
W 84-66
+5.5
7
@
UK
L 71-74
−1.5
11
@
MSST
W 73-64
+0.5
14
vs
LSU
W 73-63
−4.5
18
vs
OU
W 89-66
+11.5
21
@
VAN
W 69-65
+6.5
24
@
MIZ
L 69-73
−7.5
28
vs
ALA
L 69-71
−7.5
3
@
SC
W 78-59
+8.5
7
vs
VAN
L 82-86
−6.5
12
vs
AUB
W 72-62
+4.5
13
vs
VAN
L 68-75
−8.5
20
vs
M-OH
W 78-56
+9.5
22
vs
UVA
W 79-72
+5.5
27
vs
ISU
W 76-62
+16.5
29
vs
MICH
L 62-95
−24.5
covered 17didn’t cover 20avg −1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
MER
W 76-61
−6.5
8
vs
NKU
W 95-56
+13.5
12
vs
UNF
W 99-66
+9.5
17
vs
RICE
W 91-66
+13.5
20
vs
TNST
W 89-60
−8.5
24
vs
RUTG
W 85-60
+3.5
25
vs
HOU
W 76-73
+12.5
26
vs
KU
L 76-81
+16.5
2
@
SYR
L 60-62
−25.5
6
vs
ILL
L 62-75
−12.5
16
vs
LOU
W 83-62
−11.5
21
vs
GWEB
W 94-52
−6.5
30
vs
SCST
W 105-54
+11.5
3
@
ARK
L 75-86
+2.5
6
vs
TEX
W 85-71
+2.5
10
@
FLA
L 67-91
+6.5
13
vs
TA&M
W 87-82
+9.5
17
vs
UK
L 78-80
+12.5
24
@
ALA
W 79-73
−15.5
28
@
UGA
W 86-85
+13.5
31
vs
AUB
W 77-69
−1.5
3
vs
MISS
W 84-66
+10.5
7
@
UK
L 71-74
−2.5
11
@
MSST
W 73-64
−10.5
14
vs
LSU
W 73-63
−7.5
18
vs
OU
W 89-66
+5.5
21
@
VAN
W 69-65
−16.5
24
@
MIZ
L 69-73
−1.5
28
vs
ALA
L 69-71
−22.5
3
@
SC
W 78-59
−4.5
7
vs
VAN
L 82-86
+21.5
12
vs
AUB
W 72-62
−10.5
13
vs
VAN
L 68-75
−4.5
20
vs
M-OH
W 78-56
−14.5
22
vs
UVA
W 79-72
+13.5
27
vs
ISU
W 76-62
−1.5
29
vs
MICH
L 62-95
+10.5
over 18under 19avg +0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Tennessee has the better starters
Position by position: Coastal 0, Tennessee 5, even 0
CoastalBetterTennessee
G T. Thompson3.7 pts · 4 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 15
→TENNBig
G J. Harris TR21.4 pts · 6.5 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 99
G D. Washington TR4.5 pts · 2 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 25
→TENNBig
G T. Lundblade TR15.8 pts · 2.6 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 63
G T. Perry TR4.7 pts · 1.5 reb · 1 ast
Score 38
→TENNBig
G D. Dai Ames TR17 pts · 2 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 83
G D. Craig4.4 pts · 1.4 reb · 0.2 ast
Score 31
→TENNSmall
F B. Lue TR10.9 pts · 5.1 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 53
F A. Hardaway TR5.6 pts · 2.5 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 44
→TENNBig
C M. Rubin TR11.3 pts · 7.1 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 83
CoastalBetterTennessee
CCU offense295th of 366 · -9.1
→TENNBig
TENN defense9th of 366 · +8.2
CCU defense246th of 366 · -6.5
→TENNBig
TENN offense9th of 366 · +10.4
Backcourt-4.7 · 4 players
→TENNBig
Backcourt+8.4 · 3 players
Frontcourt-0.4 · 1 player
→TENNBig
Frontcourt+3.1 · 2 players
Bench-1.9 · 4 players
→TENNBig
Bench+11.2 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestCCU betterTENN betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
T. Thompson20 minD. Washington15 min · TRT. Perry13 min · TRD. Craig12 minJ. Cross6 min · TRJ. AlstonNew
Forwards
A. Hardaway20 min · TRD. Green11 minD. Fuquay8 min · TRF. BighamNewJ. BuzzardNew
Centers
C. Middleton10 min · TR
Guards
J. Harris35 min · TRT. Lundblade35 min · TRD. Dai Ames32 min · TRJ. Haralson27 min · TRT. Hill25 min · TRT. Henderson7 min
Forwards
B. Lue27 min · TRJ. Washington21 min · TRD. Brown15 minC. Fermin13 min · TRC. WashingtonNewR. ScottNew
Centers
M. Rubin30 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 71.8 #251 | Points per game | 78.8 #81 |
| 1.03 #290 | Points per possession | 1.16 #49 |
| 69.9 #121 | Pace (possessions) | 68.1 #226 |
| Shooting | ||
| 47.9 #314 | Effective FG% | 51.4 #174 |
| 33.5 #196 | 3-point % | 33.4 #201 |
| 43.1 #113 | 3-point attempt rate | 32.1 #328 |
| 32.3 #254 | Free throw rate | 37.4 #115 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.3 #84 | Turnover rate | 17.4 #227 |
| 26.9 #296 | Offensive rebound rate | 44.7 #1 |
| 9.9 #359 | Assists per game | 17.1 #24 |
| Defense | ||
| 73.5 #143 | Points allowed | 69.6 #58 |
| 1.05 #88 | Points allowed per possession | 1.02 #43 |
| 46.8 #18 | Opponent effective FG% | 47.8 #37 |
| 32.8 #105 | Opponent 3-point % | 30.5 #21 |
| 12.3 #364 | Turnovers forced | 16.1 #215 |
| 72.4 #52 | Defensive rebound rate | 72.2 #61 |
| 4.3 #360 | Steals per game | 7.3 #101 |
| 3.2 #187 | Blocks per game | 3.7 #114 |
Coastal
18-13 in 2025-26 overall · 11-8 in conference · Sun Belt Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs GA Southern72–96
- W@ James Madison69–68
- W@ Georgia St76–71
- Wvs Marshall79–75
- Lvs James Madison65–67
A week or more of rest.
Tennessee
25-12 in 2025-26 overall · 12-8 in conference · Southeastern Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Michigan62–95
- Wvs Iowa State76–62
- Wvs Virginia79–72
- Wvs Miami OH78–56
- Lvs Vanderbilt68–75
A week or more of rest.