UTSA Roadrunners at San José State Spartans: Model Line and Edge

Mon, Nov 2, 3:00 PM ETProvident Credit Union Event Center · at San José St

#192UTSAUTSA

LineSJSU -8.5moved 1 toward SJSU

Total153.5no move

Season records: UTSA and San José St
UTSA	This season	SJSU
0-0	Record	0-0
0-0	ATS	0-0
0-0	O/U	0-0

ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders

Model: projects SJSU 79–71 · win probability SJSU 76%

Pick this game

Your picksMy picks ›

Spread

Total

Winner

Line

SJSU -8.5

moved 1 toward SJSU

Total

153.5

model 150.7 · Under by 3

Model edge

Even

matches the market

Public on the spread

56% SJSU

55% of the money

The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record

What could decide it: SJSU has more of the edges

UTSA 0, SJSU 4 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games

SJSUBig

Turnovers

Turnover rate: UTSA 17.4%, SJSU 15.1%. Forced: UTSA 14.7%, SJSU 17.4%

SJSUSmall

Three-pointers

UTSA hits 29.2% and allows 35.1%; SJSU hits 35.3% and allows 36.0%. Threes are 41.3% and 38.3% of their shots

SJSUSmall

SJSU offense vs UTSA defense

Offense 141st of 366 against a defense 238th, on the model’s ratings

Context

Tempo

About 68 possessions: UTSA plays 69.6 a game (142nd fastest), SJSU 66.0 (315th). Faster games mean more points

SJSUSmall

Home court

SJSU at home. This season: SJSU 0-0 at home, UTSA 0-0 away

Even

Free throws

Free throw rate: UTSA 29.5, SJSU 33.4. Allowed: UTSA 33.3, SJSU 35.4

Context

Schedule so far

UTSA has played the 104th-hardest schedule, SJSU the 85th. A record against a soft schedule means less

Even

Who is back

Minutes back from last season: UTSA 15%, SJSU 24%. Transfers in: UTSA 9, SJSU 6. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price

Even

Rebounding

Offensive rebound rate: UTSA 30.2%, SJSU 29.3%. Defensive: UTSA 61.3%, SJSU 63.5%

Even

Shooting

Effective FG%: UTSA 44.8 and allows 53.3; SJSU 49.7 and allows 57.1

Even

UTSA offense vs SJSU defense

Offense 155th of 366 against a defense 151st, on the model’s ratings

Sorted by how lopsided each matchup is, from national ranks. Reasons to look, not picks: the market already knows most of this.

How games like this went

Division I games since 2023-24, closing lines

Situation	Games	Favorite won	Favorite covered	Went over
Home favorites of 7 to 9.5	1806	78%	49%	50%
Non-conference games at this spread	832	79%	51%	51%
Lines that moved 1+ toward the favorite	6763	75%	50%	51%
Games with a total of 150 to 154.5	2755	75%	51%	50%

A bet at standard prices needs 52.4% to break even, and most situations sit near 50%. Past rates, not a prediction.

Market

Open → current

Spread

OpenSJSU -7.5

1 → SJSU

NowSJSU -8.5

1 pt toward SJSU

Total

Open153.5

no move

Now153.5

No change since the open

Moneyline

UTSA +250 · SJSU -310

Line movement

Median of 8 sportsbooks, pre-tip-off · tap a dot

Opened SJSU -7.5 · now SJSU -8.5 · moved 1 toward SJSUmodel SJSU -8 matches the line

model SJSU -8 = line ✓

Openline modelNow

Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.

Public betting

Share of bets and of money

UTSA +8.5Spread

SJSU -8.5

Bets

44%56%

Money

45%55%

Over 153.5TotalUnder 153.5

Bets

41%59%

Money

41%59%

UTSAWinner

SJSU

Bets

96%

Money

8%92%

Sports Betting Dime, an average of sportsbooks. Read Mon, Nov 2, 4:41 AM ET. ⓘ

Books

8 sportsbooks · current prices

SpreadTotalMoneyline

Book	Spread		Total		Moneyline
Book	UTSA	SJSU	Over	Under	UTSA	SJSU
BetMGMMGM	-8.5-115	+8.5-105	153.5-105	153.5-115	+290	-375
BetOnline.agBetOnline.ag	-8-110	+8-110	153-110	153-110	—	—
BetRiversBetRivers	-8.5-108	+8.5-115	153.5-110	153.5-115	+310	-455
BetUSBetUS	-8-110	+8-110	153-110	153-110	—	—
BovadaBovada	-8-110	+8-110	153-110	153-110	+265	-330
DraftKingsDK	-8.5-115	+8.5-105	153.5-105	153.5-115	+300	-380
FanDuelFD	-8.5-114	+8.5-106	153.5-110	153.5-110	+290	-375
LowVig.agLowVig.ag	-8-106	+8-106	153-108	153-108	—	—

Prices from The Odds API, updated 2:00 AM ET. Green = best price in the column.

Model vs market

	Market	Model	Model edge
Spread	SJSU -8.5	SJSU -8.2	UTSA +0.3
Total	153.5	150.7	Under 2.8
Projected score	—	UTSA 71.2 · SJSU 79.4

1st-half model

1st-half slate ›

	Model	Actual
1H spread	SJSU -4.7	—
1H total	70.4	—
1H projected score	UTSA 32.8 · SJSU 37.6	—

The 1st-half model is fitted from the full-game model and past halves. ESPN has no 1st-half lines for college games, so there is no market to compare it with.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

ATS

2025-26 season

	Season	Cover	Venue	Role
UTSA WLWLW	10-18	36%	4-10	10-17
SJSU LLLWW	16-16	50%	6-9	4-2

Venue/role: UTSA away, as underdog; SJSU home, as favorite. Squares: last 5 games ATS (W covered, L didn’t), oldest first.

Totals

2025-26 season

	O-U	Over %	SU
UTSA UOOUU	13-15	46%	3-25
SJSU OUOOO	21-11	66%	8-24

Squares: last 5 games (O over, U under), oldest first. Tap for the score and line.

Last 10 games

2025-26

	Straight up	Spread	Over / under
UTSA	1-9 10%	6-4 60%	6-4 60%
SJSU	3-7 30%	5-5 50%	9-1 90%

Wins-losses (pushes last). Spread and over / under skip games without a line.

Next 3 games

With how the last meeting with each opponent went

UTSA

Date	Game	Last meeting
Nov 7	vs VMI	No recent meeting
Nov 11	@ SEA	L68–71WU
Nov 15	vs TXST	L69–80LO

San José St

Date	Game	Last meeting
Nov 7	@ UCI	L63–72LU
Nov 12	vs UCR	No recent meeting
Nov 15	vs ALST	W70–57LU

Last meeting: result, against the spread, over / under. Hover a result for its date.

ATS History · 2025-26

WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total

UTSA

28 games played

Straight up

3-25

11% wins

Against the spread

10-18

36% covers · avg −3.9 pts vs the line

Over / Under

13-15

46% overs · avg −1.2 pts vs the total

Straight up

3-2511%

L L W L W L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L W L L L L L

5 straight losses0 of last 4 won

Against the spread

10-1836%

L L W L W L L L L W L L L L L L L W W W L L W W L W L W

2 of last 4 coveredno streak

Over / Under

13-1546%

U O O U U U U U O U O U U U O O O U O O U O O U O O U U

2 straight unders2 of last 4 over

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 7	vsSIUE	L 60-77	-6.5	L −23.5	153.5	U 137
Nov 12	@TXST	L 69-80	+2.5	L −8.5	147.5	O 149
Nov 15	@DEN	W 84-79	+4.5	W +9.5	148.5	O 163
Nov 24	vsACU	L 50-61	+2.5	L −8.5	144.5	U 111
Nov 25	vsGASO	W 77-64	+3.5	W +16.5	160.5	U 141
Nov 30	vsUSA	L 58-82	+1.5	L −22.5	141.5	U 140
Dec 7	@ALA	L 55-97	+33.5	L −8.5	171.5	U 152
Dec 13	@COLO	L 64-88	+22.5	L −1.5	154.5	U 152
Dec 17	@USC	L 70-97	+25.5	L −1.5	157.5	O 167
Dec 22	vsSEA	L 68-71	+10.5	W +7.5	148.5	U 139
Dec 31	@FAU	L 70-110	+16.5	L −23.5	158.5	O 180
Jan 3	@TEM	L 57-76	+10.5	L −8.5	149.5	U 133
Jan 7	vsCLT	L 58-74	+6.5	L −9.5	145.5	U 132
Jan 10	vsTULN	L 52-85	+7.5	L −25.5	147.5	U 137
Jan 14	vsRICE	L 73-89	+6.5	L −9.5	144.5	O 162
Jan 18	@MEM	L 69-95	+20.5	L −5.5	147.5	O 164
Jan 21	@UNT	L 62-81	+15.5	L −3.5	138.5	O 143
Jan 24	vsTEM	L 64-70	+10.5	W +4.5	145.5	U 134
Jan 28	vsUAB	L 73-83	+12.5	W +2.5	155.5	O 156
Feb 4	@USF	L 88-109	+23.5	W +2.5	164.5	O 197
Feb 7	vsUNT	L 58-81	+10.5	L −12.5	141.5	U 139
Feb 11	@ECU	L 72-88	+10.5	L −5.5	150.5	O 160
Feb 15	@CLT	W 88-79	+13.5	W +22.5	148.5	O 167
Feb 18	vsFAU	L 52-60	+11.5	W +3.5	157.5	U 112
Feb 22	@TLSA	L 74-100	+21.5	L −4.5	159.5	O 174
Feb 25	vsECU	L 81-82	+4.5	W +3.5	153.5	O 163
Mar 1	vsWICH	L 67-84	+15.5	L −1.5	151.5	U 151
Mar 8	@RICE	L 71-80	+11.5	W +2.5	151.5	U 151

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

SIUE

L 60-77

−23.5

TXST

L 69-80

−8.5

DEN

W 84-79

+9.5

ACU

L 50-61

−8.5

GASO

W 77-64

+16.5

USA

L 58-82

−22.5

ALA

L 55-97

−8.5

COLO

L 64-88

−1.5

USC

L 70-97

−1.5

SEA

L 68-71

+7.5

FAU

L 70-110

−23.5

TEM

L 57-76

−8.5

CLT

L 58-74

−9.5

TULN

L 52-85

−25.5

RICE

L 73-89

−9.5

MEM

L 69-95

−5.5

UNT

L 62-81

−3.5

TEM

L 64-70

+4.5

UAB

L 73-83

+2.5

USF

L 88-109

+2.5

UNT

L 58-81

−12.5

ECU

L 72-88

−5.5

CLT

W 88-79

+22.5

FAU

L 52-60

+3.5

TLSA

L 74-100

−4.5

ECU

L 81-82

+3.5

WICH

L 67-84

−1.5

RICE

L 71-80

+2.5

covered 10didn’t cover 18avg −3.9 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

SIUE

L 60-77

−16.5

TXST

L 69-80

+1.5

DEN

W 84-79

+14.5

ACU

L 50-61

−33.5

GASO

W 77-64

−19.5

USA

L 58-82

−1.5

ALA

L 55-97

−19.5

COLO

L 64-88

−2.5

USC

L 70-97

+9.5

SEA

L 68-71

−9.5

FAU

L 70-110

+21.5

TEM

L 57-76

−16.5

CLT

L 58-74

−13.5

TULN

L 52-85

−10.5

RICE

L 73-89

+17.5

MEM

L 69-95

+16.5

UNT

L 62-81

+4.5

TEM

L 64-70

−11.5

UAB

L 73-83

+0.5

USF

L 88-109

+32.5

UNT

L 58-81

−2.5

ECU

L 72-88

+9.5

CLT

W 88-79

+18.5

FAU

L 52-60

−45.5

TLSA

L 74-100

+14.5

ECU

L 81-82

+9.5

WICH

L 67-84

−0.5

RICE

L 71-80

−0.5

over 13under 15avg −1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin

San José St

32 games played

Straight up

8-24

25% wins

Against the spread

16-16

50% covers · avg +0.4 pts vs the line

Over / Under

21-11

66% overs · avg +5.1 pts vs the total

Straight up

8-2425%

L L L W L W L W W L L L L L L W L L L L L L L L W L W L L L W L

1 of last 4 wonno streak

Against the spread

16-1650%

W L W W L W L W L W L L W L L W L L W L W W W L W W L L L L W W

2 straight covers2 of last 4 covered

Over / Under

21-1166%

O O U U U U U O O O O O O U U O U O U O O U O O O O O O U O O O

3 straight overs3 of last 4 over

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 3	@UTAH	L 75-84	+11.5	W +2.5	146.5	O 159
Nov 8	@UCSB	L 74-85	+9.5	L −1.5	146.5	O 159
Nov 13	@MSU	L 60-79	+24.5	W +5.5	143.5	U 139
Nov 21	vsSOU	W 80-66	-5.5	W +8.5	150.5	U 146
Nov 25	vsTLSA	L 51-81	+5.5	L −24.5	149.5	U 132
Nov 26	vsLUC	W 63-51	-1.5	W +10.5	136.5	U 114
Nov 30	vsUCI	L 63-72	+3.5	L −5.5	139.5	U 135
Dec 5	vsUSD	W 86-69	-6.5	W +10.5	144.5	O 155
Dec 9	vsLBSU	W 89-83	-7.5	L −1.5	141.5	O 172
Dec 13	vsSTAN	L 82-86	+8.5	W +4.5	145.5	O 168
Dec 20	@UNM	L 65-88	+16.5	L −6.5	152.5	O 153
Dec 30	vsSDSU	L 68-81	+11.5	L −1.5	141.5	O 149
Jan 3	@USU	L 78-96	+22.5	W +4.5	151.5	O 174
Jan 6	vsFRES	L 55-70	+1.5	L −13.5	149.5	U 125
Jan 10	@GCU	L 58-76	+16.5	L −1.5	141.5	U 134
Jan 13	vsAF	W 70-62	-5.5	W +2.5	128.5	O 132
Jan 17	vsUNLV	L 62-76	+7.5	L −6.5	146.5	U 138
Jan 20	@NEV	L 54-87	+16.5	L −16.5	137.5	O 141
Jan 24	@WYO	L 62-66	+13.5	W +9.5	141.5	U 128
Jan 27	vsBOIS	L 58-89	+12.5	L −18.5	141.5	O 147
Jan 31	vsUNM	L 80-90	+15.5	W +5.5	148.5	O 170
Feb 7	@CSU	L 57-65	+15.5	W +7.5	138.5	U 122
Feb 10	@UNLV	L 75-82	+12.5	W +5.5	149.5	O 157
Feb 14	vsGCU	L 79-94	+11.5	L −3.5	139.5	O 173
Feb 17	vsNEV	W 87-71	+10.5	W +26.5	141.5	O 158
Feb 21	@BOIS	L 69-84	+18.5	W +3.5	146.5	O 153
Feb 24	@AF	W 86-80	-6.5	L −0.5	145.5	O 166
Feb 28	vsCSU	L 73-85	+4.5	L −7.5	151.5	O 158
Mar 3	@FRES	L 68-82	+7.5	L −6.5	151.5	U 150
Mar 7	vsWYO	L 78-88	+6.5	L −3.5	148.5	O 166
Mar 11	vsBOIS	W 84-74	+14.5	W +24.5	146.5	O 158
Mar 12	vsUNM	L 77-93	+16.5	W +0.5	154.5	O 170

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

UTAH

L 75-84

+2.5

UCSB

L 74-85

−1.5

MSU

L 60-79

+5.5

SOU

W 80-66

+8.5

TLSA

L 51-81

−24.5

LUC

W 63-51

+10.5

UCI

L 63-72

−5.5

USD

W 86-69

+10.5

LBSU

W 89-83

−1.5

STAN

L 82-86

+4.5

UNM

L 65-88

−6.5

SDSU

L 68-81

−1.5

USU

L 78-96

+4.5

FRES

L 55-70

−13.5

GCU

L 58-76

−1.5

W 70-62

+2.5

UNLV

L 62-76

−6.5

NEV

L 54-87

−16.5

WYO

L 62-66

+9.5

BOIS

L 58-89

−18.5

UNM

L 80-90

+5.5

CSU

L 57-65

+7.5

UNLV

L 75-82

+5.5

GCU

L 79-94

−3.5

NEV

W 87-71

+26.5

BOIS

L 69-84

+3.5

W 86-80

−0.5

CSU

L 73-85

−7.5

FRES

L 68-82

−6.5

WYO

L 78-88

−3.5

BOIS

W 84-74

+24.5

UNM

L 77-93

+0.5

covered 16didn’t cover 16avg +0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

UTAH

L 75-84

+12.5

UCSB

L 74-85

+12.5

MSU

L 60-79

−4.5

SOU

W 80-66

−4.5

TLSA

L 51-81

−17.5

LUC

W 63-51

−22.5

UCI

L 63-72

−4.5

USD

W 86-69

+10.5

LBSU

W 89-83

+30.5

STAN

L 82-86

+22.5

UNM

L 65-88

+0.5

SDSU

L 68-81

+7.5

USU

L 78-96

+22.5

FRES

L 55-70

−24.5

GCU

L 58-76

−7.5

W 70-62

+3.5

UNLV

L 62-76

−8.5

NEV

L 54-87

+3.5

WYO

L 62-66

−13.5

BOIS

L 58-89

+5.5

UNM

L 80-90

+21.5

CSU

L 57-65

−16.5

UNLV

L 75-82

+7.5

GCU

L 79-94

+33.5

NEV

W 87-71

+16.5

BOIS

L 69-84

+6.5

W 86-80

+20.5

CSU

L 73-85

+6.5

FRES

L 68-82

−1.5

WYO

L 78-88

+17.5

BOIS

W 84-74

+11.5

UNM

L 77-93

+15.5

over 21under 11avg +5.1 ptslonger = bigger margin

Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.

San José St has the better starters

Position by position: UTSA 0, San José St 1, even 4

UTSABetterSan José St

G D. Hayes8.7 pts · 1.8 reb · 1.8 ast Score 16

SJSUSmall

G P. Goodarzi8.2 pts · 1.9 reb · 0.9 ast Score 35

G J. Kelly TR8.3 pts · 3.9 reb · 0.6 ast Score 44

No call

G J. Hannah7.5 pts · 1 reb · 0.5 ast Not ranked

G D. Williams TR10 pts · 3.2 reb · 0.9 ast Score 72

No call

F Z. Eddine Bedri TR12.8 pts · 7.4 reb · 2.2 ast Not ranked

G P. Turner TR7 pts · 1.5 reb · 0.8 ast Score 31

No call

F R. Vaihola TR5 pts · 7.6 reb · 1.4 ast Not ranked

G I. Coleman TR6.4 pts · 3.8 reb · 0.8 ast Score 50

Even

F M. Cook TR7.5 pts · 4 reb · 1.5 ast Score 61

UTSABetterSan José St

UTSA offense155th of 366 · -4.7

Even

SJSU defense151st of 366 · -3.3

UTSA defense238th of 366 · -6.2

SJSUSmall

SJSU offense141st of 366 · -4.3

Backcourt-5.4 · 5 players

SJSUBig

Backcourt-1.8 · 2 players

FrontcourtNo numbers yet

No call

Frontcourt+2.3 · 3 players

Bench-3.5 · 5 players

SJSUBig

Bench+1.4 · 3 players

Score, worst to bestUTSA betterSJSU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers

Projected starters: college teams publish no depth chart, so these come from minutes played, and a freshman or a new starter can change them. The score is the share of ranked players at the position that player is ahead of. Numbers are this season's once a player has 30 minutes, 2025-26's before that. Bench is the next five by minutes. Tap a player for the full numbers.

Depth chart

Projected rotation by position, starters outlined

UTSA

Guards

D. Hayes31 minJ. Kelly27 min · TRD. Williams22 min · TRP. Turner20 min · TRI. Coleman19 min · TRS. Eberwein19 min · TR

Forwards

A. Smith5 min · TRC. OkpukparaNewM. BroxtonNewJ. PetersonNewK. TaylorNew

San José St

Guards

P. Goodarzi26 minJ. Hannah22 minM. Mason20 min · TRJ. Chammaa17 min · TRR. GreenNewC. KruegerNew

Forwards

Z. Eddine Bedri24 min · TRR. Vaihola21 min · TRM. Cook21 min · TRK. Martin8 min · TRL. HowardNew

Centers

M. Dau NyangolNew

In order of minutes, from rosters as of today. ESPN lists players only as guards, forwards or centers, and no injury report exists for college basketball, so a player who is out may still show here.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

Matchup stats

2025-26 · rank among 365 teams

ChartTable

Scoring

Points per game

UTSA67.3 #329

SJSU70.8 #269

Points per possession

UTSA0.96 #348

SJSU1.07 #203

Pace (possessions)

UTSA69.6 #142

SJSU66.0 #315

Shooting

Effective FG%

UTSA44.8 #360

SJSU49.7 #255

3-point %

UTSA29.2 #351

SJSU35.3 #97

3-point attempt rate

UTSA41.3 #143

SJSU38.3 #204

Free throw rate

UTSA29.5 #320

SJSU33.4 #225

Possessions

Turnover rate

UTSA17.4 #231

SJSU15.1 #77

Offensive rebound rate

UTSA30.2 #191

SJSU29.3 #225

Assists per game

UTSA10.1 #357

SJSU10.3 #353

Defense

Points allowed

UTSA82.9 #345

SJSU79.2 #305

Points allowed per possession

UTSA1.20 #356

SJSU1.20 #359

Opponent effective FG%

UTSA53.3 #277

SJSU57.1 #359

Opponent 3-point %

UTSA35.1 #251

SJSU36.0 #305

Turnovers forced

UTSA14.7 #309

SJSU17.4 #123

Defensive rebound rate

UTSA61.3 #363

SJSU63.5 #354

Steals per game

UTSA6.3 #203

SJSU5.8 #259

Blocks per game

UTSA4.3 #52

SJSU2.2 #333

UTSA		SJSU
Scoring
67.3 #329	Points per game	70.8 #269
0.96 #348	Points per possession	1.07 #203
69.6 #142	Pace (possessions)	66.0 #315
Shooting
44.8 #360	Effective FG%	49.7 #255
29.2 #351	3-point %	35.3 #97
41.3 #143	3-point attempt rate	38.3 #204
29.5 #320	Free throw rate	33.4 #225
Possessions
17.4 #231	Turnover rate	15.1 #77
30.2 #191	Offensive rebound rate	29.3 #225
10.1 #357	Assists per game	10.3 #353
Defense
82.9 #345	Points allowed	79.2 #305
1.20 #356	Points allowed per possession	1.20 #359
53.3 #277	Opponent effective FG%	57.1 #359
35.1 #251	Opponent 3-point %	36.0 #305
14.7 #309	Turnovers forced	17.4 #123
61.3 #363	Defensive rebound rate	63.5 #354
6.3 #203	Steals per game	5.8 #259
4.3 #52	Blocks per game	2.2 #333

From the box scores. A longer bar is a better national rank, on every row; the better team's bar is solid. A green rank is near the top of Division I, a red one near the bottom. Pace and 3-point rate are styles, so they have no better side.

UTSA

3-25 in 2025-26 overall · 1-17 in conference · American Conference

Last five, 2025-26

L@ Rice71–80
Lvs Wichita St67–84
Lvs East Carolina81–82
L@ Tulsa74–100
Lvs FAU52–60

A week or more of rest.

San José St

8-24 in 2025-26 overall · 4-18 in conference · Mountain West Conference

Last five, 2025-26

Lvs New Mexico77–93
Wvs Boise St84–74
Lvs Wyoming78–88
L@ Fresno St68–82
Lvs Colorado St73–85

A week or more of rest.