UTSA Convocation Center · at UTSA
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | UTSA | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects TXST 79–73 · win probability TXST 70%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 151.3
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: TXST has more of the edges
TXST 5, UTSA 1 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: TXST 33.9%, UTSA 30.2%. Defensive: TXST 71.6%, UTSA 61.3%
Context
Schedule so far
TXST has played the 298th-hardest schedule, UTSA the 104th. A record against a soft schedule means less
TXST offense vs UTSA defense
Offense 105th of 366 against a defense 238th, on the model’s ratings
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: TXST 69%, UTSA 15%. Transfers in: TXST 5, UTSA 9. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Shooting
Effective FG%: TXST 50.0 and allows 52.0; UTSA 44.8 and allows 53.3
Turnovers
Turnover rate: TXST 18.7%, UTSA 17.4%. Forced: TXST 18.5%, UTSA 14.7%
Home court
UTSA at home. This season: UTSA 0-0 at home, TXST 0-0 away
Even
UTSA offense vs TXST defense
Offense 155th of 366 against a defense 112th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: TXST plays 68.2 a game (223rd fastest), UTSA 69.6 (142nd). Faster games mean more points
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: TXST 34.0, UTSA 29.5. Allowed: TXST 39.0, UTSA 33.3
Even
Three-pointers
TXST hits 32.2% and allows 35.7%; UTSA hits 29.2% and allows 35.1%. Threes are 24.6% and 41.3% of their shots
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | TXST -6.1 | — |
| Total | — | 151.3 | — |
| Projected score | — | TXST 78.7 · UTSA 72.6 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | TXST -3.8 | — |
| 1H total | 70.7 | — |
| 1H projected score | TXST 37.2 · UTSA 33.5 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8-2 80% | 7-3 70% | 4-6 40% | |
| 1-9 10% | 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
TXST 2–1 UTSATXST leads · 3 games since 2021-22 · TXST has won the last 2 meetings · TXST 2-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2025-26 | UTSA 69 @ TXST 80 | TXST -2.5 | TXST W |
| Nov 17, 2023-24 | UTSA 62 @ TXST 72 | TXST -7.5 | TXST W |
| Nov 17, 2022-23 | TXST 56 @ UTSA 61 | UTSA +5.5 | UTSA W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Texas St
30 games played
Straight up
17-13
57% wins
Against the spread
14-16
47% covers · avg −0.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-14
53% overs · avg +2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 48-83 | +5.5 | L −29.5 | 146.5 | U 131 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 71-79 | +12.5 | W +4.5 | 146.5 | O 150 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 80-69 | -2.5 | W +8.5 | 147.5 | O 149 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 77-67 | -4.5 | W +5.5 | 144.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 63-49 | -1.5 | W +12.5 | 138.5 | U 112 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 65-56 | -5.5 | W +3.5 | 131.5 | U 121 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 52-66 | +7.5 | L −6.5 | 136.5 | U 118 |
| Nov 29 | vs | L 74-78 | -6.5 | L −10.5 | 135.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 72-77 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 133.5 | O 149 |
| Dec 10 | vs | W 86-83 | -3.5 | L −0.5 | 142.5 | O 169 |
| Dec 17 | vs | L 70-89 | +4.5 | L −14.5 | 151.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 67-65 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 136.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 31 | @ | L 80-100 | +8.5 | L −11.5 | 145.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 84-79 | -10.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 70-80 | +2.5 | L −7.5 | 144.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 82-83 | +11.5 | W +10.5 | 156.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 59-54 | -8.5 | L −3.5 | 133.5 | U 113 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 74-67 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 140.5 | O 141 |
| Jan 22 | @ | L 70-72 | +1.5 | L −0.5 | 140.5 | O 142 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 57-82 | +5.5 | L −19.5 | 143.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 72-68 | +3.5 | W +7.5 | 147.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 81-64 | -2.5 | W +14.5 | 143.5 | O 145 |
| Feb 4 | @ | W 77-71 | +4.5 | W +10.5 | 151.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 77-61 | -6.5 | W +9.5 | 146.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 74-62 | +5.5 | W +17.5 | 140.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 95-84 | -14.5 | L −3.5 | 149.5 | O 179 |
| Feb 19 | @ | W 90-82 | +3.5 | W +11.5 | 137.5 | O 172 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 54-67 | -3.5 | L −16.5 | 134.5 | U 121 |
| Feb 27 | vs | W 60-57 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 135.5 | U 117 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 77-81 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 140.5 | O 158 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
BGSU
L 48-83
−29.5
8
@
TULN
L 71-79
+4.5
12
vs
UTSA
W 80-69
+8.5
15
vs
TXSO
W 77-67
+5.5
18
vs
ACU
W 63-49
+12.5
21
vs
LR
W 65-56
+3.5
28
vs
SEA
L 52-66
−6.5
29
vs
LEH
L 74-78
−10.5
3
@
RICE
L 72-77
−1.5
10
vs
SOU
W 86-83
−0.5
17
vs
ARST
L 70-89
−14.5
20
vs
USA
W 67-65
−1.5
31
@
TROY
L 80-100
−11.5
3
@
ULM
W 84-79
−5.5
8
@
USM
L 70-80
−7.5
10
@
ARST
L 82-83
+10.5
14
vs
UL
W 59-54
−3.5
17
vs
USM
W 74-67
+4.5
22
@
CCU
L 70-72
−0.5
24
@
JMU
L 57-82
−19.5
28
vs
MRSH
W 72-68
+7.5
31
vs
ODU
W 81-64
+14.5
4
@
GASO
W 77-71
+10.5
7
vs
WMU
W 77-61
+9.5
11
vs
TROY
W 74-62
+17.5
14
vs
ULM
W 95-84
−3.5
19
@
USA
W 90-82
+11.5
21
@
UL
L 54-67
−16.5
27
vs
APP
W 60-57
+4.5
6
vs
USM
L 77-81
−5.5
covered 14didn’t cover 16avg −0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
BGSU
L 48-83
−15.5
8
@
TULN
L 71-79
+3.5
12
vs
UTSA
W 80-69
+1.5
15
vs
TXSO
W 77-67
−0.5
18
vs
ACU
W 63-49
−26.5
21
vs
LR
W 65-56
−10.5
28
vs
SEA
L 52-66
−18.5
29
vs
LEH
L 74-78
+16.5
3
@
RICE
L 72-77
+15.5
10
vs
SOU
W 86-83
+26.5
17
vs
ARST
L 70-89
+7.5
20
vs
USA
W 67-65
−4.5
31
@
TROY
L 80-100
+34.5
3
@
ULM
W 84-79
+12.5
8
@
USM
L 70-80
+5.5
10
@
ARST
L 82-83
+8.5
14
vs
UL
W 59-54
−20.5
17
vs
USM
W 74-67
+0.5
22
@
CCU
L 70-72
+1.5
24
@
JMU
L 57-82
−4.5
28
vs
MRSH
W 72-68
−7.5
31
vs
ODU
W 81-64
+1.5
4
@
GASO
W 77-71
−3.5
7
vs
WMU
W 77-61
−8.5
11
vs
TROY
W 74-62
−4.5
14
vs
ULM
W 95-84
+29.5
19
@
USA
W 90-82
+34.5
21
@
UL
L 54-67
−13.5
27
vs
APP
W 60-57
−18.5
6
vs
USM
L 77-81
+17.5
over 16under 14avg +2 ptslonger = bigger margin
UTSA
28 games played
Straight up
3-25
11% wins
Against the spread
10-18
36% covers · avg −3.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-15
46% overs · avg −1.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | vs | L 60-77 | -6.5 | L −23.5 | 153.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 69-80 | +2.5 | L −8.5 | 147.5 | O 149 |
| Nov 15 | @ | W 84-79 | +4.5 | W +9.5 | 148.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 50-61 | +2.5 | L −8.5 | 144.5 | U 111 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 77-64 | +3.5 | W +16.5 | 160.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 30 | vs | L 58-82 | +1.5 | L −22.5 | 141.5 | U 140 |
| Dec 7 | @ | L 55-97 | +33.5 | L −8.5 | 171.5 | U 152 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 64-88 | +22.5 | L −1.5 | 154.5 | U 152 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 70-97 | +25.5 | L −1.5 | 157.5 | O 167 |
| Dec 22 | vs | L 68-71 | +10.5 | W +7.5 | 148.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 31 | @ | L 70-110 | +16.5 | L −23.5 | 158.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 57-76 | +10.5 | L −8.5 | 149.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 58-74 | +6.5 | L −9.5 | 145.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 52-85 | +7.5 | L −25.5 | 147.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 73-89 | +6.5 | L −9.5 | 144.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 18 | @ | L 69-95 | +20.5 | L −5.5 | 147.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 62-81 | +15.5 | L −3.5 | 138.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 64-70 | +10.5 | W +4.5 | 145.5 | U 134 |
| Jan 28 | vs | L 73-83 | +12.5 | W +2.5 | 155.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 88-109 | +23.5 | W +2.5 | 164.5 | O 197 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 58-81 | +10.5 | L −12.5 | 141.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 11 | @ | L 72-88 | +10.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 15 | @ | W 88-79 | +13.5 | W +22.5 | 148.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 52-60 | +11.5 | W +3.5 | 157.5 | U 112 |
| Feb 22 | @ | L 74-100 | +21.5 | L −4.5 | 159.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 25 | vs | L 81-82 | +4.5 | W +3.5 | 153.5 | O 163 |
| Mar 1 | vs | L 67-84 | +15.5 | L −1.5 | 151.5 | U 151 |
| Mar 8 | @ | L 71-80 | +11.5 | W +2.5 | 151.5 | U 151 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
vs
SIUE
L 60-77
−23.5
12
@
TXST
L 69-80
−8.5
15
@
DEN
W 84-79
+9.5
24
vs
ACU
L 50-61
−8.5
25
vs
GASO
W 77-64
+16.5
30
vs
USA
L 58-82
−22.5
7
@
ALA
L 55-97
−8.5
13
@
COLO
L 64-88
−1.5
17
@
USC
L 70-97
−1.5
22
vs
SEA
L 68-71
+7.5
31
@
FAU
L 70-110
−23.5
3
@
TEM
L 57-76
−8.5
7
vs
CLT
L 58-74
−9.5
10
vs
TULN
L 52-85
−25.5
14
vs
RICE
L 73-89
−9.5
18
@
MEM
L 69-95
−5.5
21
@
UNT
L 62-81
−3.5
24
vs
TEM
L 64-70
+4.5
28
vs
UAB
L 73-83
+2.5
4
@
USF
L 88-109
+2.5
7
vs
UNT
L 58-81
−12.5
11
@
ECU
L 72-88
−5.5
15
@
CLT
W 88-79
+22.5
18
vs
FAU
L 52-60
+3.5
22
@
TLSA
L 74-100
−4.5
25
vs
ECU
L 81-82
+3.5
1
vs
WICH
L 67-84
−1.5
8
@
RICE
L 71-80
+2.5
covered 10didn’t cover 18avg −3.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
vs
SIUE
L 60-77
−16.5
12
@
TXST
L 69-80
+1.5
15
@
DEN
W 84-79
+14.5
24
vs
ACU
L 50-61
−33.5
25
vs
GASO
W 77-64
−19.5
30
vs
USA
L 58-82
−1.5
7
@
ALA
L 55-97
−19.5
13
@
COLO
L 64-88
−2.5
17
@
USC
L 70-97
+9.5
22
vs
SEA
L 68-71
−9.5
31
@
FAU
L 70-110
+21.5
3
@
TEM
L 57-76
−16.5
7
vs
CLT
L 58-74
−13.5
10
vs
TULN
L 52-85
−10.5
14
vs
RICE
L 73-89
+17.5
18
@
MEM
L 69-95
+16.5
21
@
UNT
L 62-81
+4.5
24
vs
TEM
L 64-70
−11.5
28
vs
UAB
L 73-83
+0.5
4
@
USF
L 88-109
+32.5
7
vs
UNT
L 58-81
−2.5
11
@
ECU
L 72-88
+9.5
15
@
CLT
W 88-79
+18.5
18
vs
FAU
L 52-60
−45.5
22
@
TLSA
L 74-100
+14.5
25
vs
ECU
L 81-82
+9.5
1
vs
WICH
L 67-84
−0.5
8
@
RICE
L 71-80
−0.5
over 13under 15avg −1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Texas St has the better starters
Position by position: Texas St 4, UTSA 0, even 1
Texas StBetterUTSA
G M. Drone14 pts · 3.3 reb · 2.9 ast
Score 56
←TXSTBig
G D. Hayes8.7 pts · 1.8 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 16
G Q. House TR15.1 pts · 3.4 reb · 3.3 ast
Score 84
←TXSTBig
G J. Kelly TR8.3 pts · 3.9 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 44
G K. Younger TR15.1 pts · 4.3 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 76
=Even
G D. Williams TR10 pts · 3.2 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 72
F D. Hall15.7 pts · 7.8 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 94
←TXSTBig
G P. Turner TR7 pts · 1.5 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 31
F P. Djobet TR17.5 pts · 6.6 reb · 2 ast
Score 89
←TXSTBig
G I. Coleman TR6.4 pts · 3.8 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 50
Texas StBetterUTSA
TXST offense105th of 366 · -1.4
←TXSTBig
UTSA defense238th of 366 · -6.2
TXST defense112th of 366 · -1.4
=Even
UTSA offense155th of 366 · -4.7
Backcourt+2.5 · 3 players
←TXSTBig
Backcourt-5.4 · 5 players
Frontcourt+7.5 · 2 players
=No call
FrontcourtNo numbers yet
Bench-0.3 · 5 players
←TXSTBig
Bench-3.5 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestTXST betterUTSA betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
M. Drone31 minQ. House31 min · TRK. Younger29 min · TRK. Gumbs28 minD. Pernell22 minC. Steger11 min · TR
Forwards
D. Hall30 minP. Djobet30 min · TRR. Jessamy27 min · TRK. GrandisonNewD. AbisogunNewK. SandersNew
Centers
R. Fields16 min
Guards
D. Hayes31 minJ. Kelly27 min · TRD. Williams22 min · TRP. Turner20 min · TRI. Coleman19 min · TRS. Eberwein19 min · TR
Forwards
A. Smith5 min · TRC. OkpukparaNewM. BroxtonNewJ. PetersonNewK. TaylorNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 71.9 #247 | Points per game | 67.3 #329 |
| 1.06 #230 | Points per possession | 0.96 #348 |
| 68.2 #223 | Pace (possessions) | 69.6 #142 |
| Shooting | ||
| 50.0 #238 | Effective FG% | 44.8 #360 |
| 32.2 #271 | 3-point % | 29.2 #351 |
| 24.6 #364 | 3-point attempt rate | 41.3 #143 |
| 34.0 #211 | Free throw rate | 29.5 #320 |
| Possessions | ||
| 18.7 #309 | Turnover rate | 17.4 #231 |
| 33.9 #68 | Offensive rebound rate | 30.2 #191 |
| 12.7 #239 | Assists per game | 10.1 #357 |
| Defense | ||
| 72.5 #117 | Points allowed | 82.9 #345 |
| 1.06 #106 | Points allowed per possession | 1.20 #356 |
| 52.0 #210 | Opponent effective FG% | 53.3 #277 |
| 35.7 #293 | Opponent 3-point % | 35.1 #251 |
| 18.5 #75 | Turnovers forced | 14.7 #309 |
| 71.6 #81 | Defensive rebound rate | 61.3 #363 |
| 7.9 #41 | Steals per game | 6.3 #203 |
| 3.6 #120 | Blocks per game | 4.3 #52 |
Texas St
17-13 in 2025-26 overall · 11-8 in conference · Pac-12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Southern Miss77–81
- Wvs App State60–57
- L@ Louisiana54–67
- W@ South Alabama90–82
- Wvs UL Monroe95–84
A week or more of rest.
UTSA
3-25 in 2025-26 overall · 1-17 in conference · American Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Rice71–80
- Lvs Wichita St67–84
- Lvs East Carolina81–82
- L@ Tulsa74–100
- Lvs FAU52–60
A week or more of rest.