UTSA Convocation Center · at UTSA
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | UTSA | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects UTSA 81–71 · win probability UTSA 80%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 152.0
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: UTSA has more of the edges
VMI 2, UTSA 4 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
UTSA offense vs VMI defense
Offense 155th of 366 against a defense 342nd, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
VMI has played the 253rd-hardest schedule, UTSA the 104th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Turnovers
Turnover rate: VMI 15.3%, UTSA 17.4%. Forced: VMI 15.7%, UTSA 14.7%
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: VMI 59%, UTSA 15%. Transfers in: VMI 1, UTSA 9. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: VMI 25.6%, UTSA 30.2%. Defensive: VMI 62.8%, UTSA 61.3%
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: VMI plays 67.6 a game (251st fastest), UTSA 69.6 (142nd). Faster games mean more points
Home court
UTSA at home. This season: UTSA 0-0 at home, VMI 0-0 away
VMI offense vs UTSA defense
Offense 288th of 366 against a defense 238th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: VMI 47.5 and allows 57.0; UTSA 44.8 and allows 53.3
Even
Three-pointers
VMI hits 31.5% and allows 36.5%; UTSA hits 29.2% and allows 35.1%. Threes are 53.6% and 41.3% of their shots
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: VMI 30.6, UTSA 29.5. Allowed: VMI 34.6, UTSA 33.3
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | UTSA -9.6 | — |
| Total | — | 152.0 | — |
| Projected score | — | VMI 71.2 · UTSA 80.8 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | UTSA -5.6 | — |
| 1H total | 71.1 | — |
| 1H projected score | VMI 32.7 · UTSA 38.3 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-10 0% | 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% | |
| 1-9 10% | 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
VMI
29 games played
Straight up
3-26
10% wins
Against the spread
9-20
31% covers · avg −5.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-16
45% overs · avg −0.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | @ | W 78-74 | -2.5 | W +1.5 | 153.5 | U 152 |
| Nov 9 | @ | L 68-106 | +23.5 | L −14.5 | 161.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 67-69 | +1.5 | L −0.5 | 151.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 54-87 | +14.5 | L −18.5 | 152.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 22 | @ | L 80-99 | -2.5 | L −21.5 | 148.5 | O 179 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 70-78 | +5.5 | L −2.5 | 150.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 48-81 | +11.5 | L −21.5 | 148.5 | U 129 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 57-82 | +25.5 | W +0.5 | 159.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 9 | vs | W 86-70 | +2.5 | W +18.5 | 151.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 90-97 | +11.5 | W +4.5 | 158.5 | O 187 |
| Jan 1 | vs | L 58-78 | +6.5 | L −13.5 | 154.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 79-71 | +6.5 | W +14.5 | 149.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 67-81 | +16.5 | W +2.5 | 146.5 | O 148 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 48-69 | +12.5 | L −8.5 | 149.5 | U 117 |
| Jan 15 | vs | L 67-77 | +8.5 | L −1.5 | 153.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 68-82 | -6.5 | L −20.5 | 143.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 21 | vs | L 78-85 | +2.5 | L −4.5 | 151.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 58-88 | +8.5 | L −21.5 | 152.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 56-80 | +2.5 | L −21.5 | 142.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 81-95 | +18.5 | W +4.5 | 153.5 | O 176 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 67-81 | +8.5 | L −5.5 | 149.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 70-87 | +14.5 | L −2.5 | 143.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 11 | @ | L 71-92 | +8.5 | L −12.5 | 150.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 72-90 | +11.5 | L −6.5 | 148.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 76-82 | +13.5 | W +7.5 | 158.5 | U 158 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 62-81 | +8.5 | L −10.5 | 154.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 61-80 | +17.5 | L −1.5 | 155.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 79-86 | +11.5 | W +4.5 | 154.5 | O 165 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 70-84 | +7.5 | L −6.5 | 154.5 | U 154 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
@
USI
W 78-74
+1.5
9
@
MIZ
L 68-106
−14.5
15
vs
JAX
L 67-69
−0.5
19
@
RICH
L 54-87
−18.5
22
@
STET
L 80-99
−21.5
24
vs
BUF
L 70-78
−2.5
26
vs
BGSU
L 48-81
−21.5
29
@
UCF
L 57-82
+0.5
9
vs
L-MD
W 86-70
+18.5
21
@
RAD
L 90-97
+4.5
1
vs
SAM
L 58-78
−13.5
3
vs
UTC
W 79-71
+14.5
7
@
ETSU
L 67-81
+2.5
10
@
FUR
L 48-69
−8.5
15
vs
MER
L 67-77
−1.5
17
vs
CIT
L 68-82
−20.5
21
vs
UNCG
L 78-85
−4.5
24
@
WCU
L 58-88
−21.5
29
@
CIT
L 56-80
−21.5
31
@
MER
L 81-95
+4.5
4
vs
WOF
L 67-81
−5.5
7
vs
ETSU
L 70-87
−2.5
11
@
UNCG
L 71-92
−12.5
14
vs
FUR
L 72-90
−6.5
18
@
WOF
L 76-82
+7.5
21
vs
WCU
L 62-81
−10.5
26
@
SAM
L 61-80
−1.5
28
@
UTC
L 79-86
+4.5
6
vs
UNCG
L 70-84
−6.5
covered 9didn’t cover 20avg −5.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
@
USI
W 78-74
−1.5
9
@
MIZ
L 68-106
+12.5
15
vs
JAX
L 67-69
−15.5
19
@
RICH
L 54-87
−11.5
22
@
STET
L 80-99
+30.5
24
vs
BUF
L 70-78
−2.5
26
vs
BGSU
L 48-81
−19.5
29
@
UCF
L 57-82
−20.5
9
vs
L-MD
W 86-70
+4.5
21
@
RAD
L 90-97
+28.5
1
vs
SAM
L 58-78
−18.5
3
vs
UTC
W 79-71
+0.5
7
@
ETSU
L 67-81
+1.5
10
@
FUR
L 48-69
−32.5
15
vs
MER
L 67-77
−9.5
17
vs
CIT
L 68-82
+6.5
21
vs
UNCG
L 78-85
+11.5
24
@
WCU
L 58-88
−6.5
29
@
CIT
L 56-80
−6.5
31
@
MER
L 81-95
+22.5
4
vs
WOF
L 67-81
−1.5
7
vs
ETSU
L 70-87
+13.5
11
@
UNCG
L 71-92
+12.5
14
vs
FUR
L 72-90
+13.5
18
@
WOF
L 76-82
−0.5
21
vs
WCU
L 62-81
−11.5
26
@
SAM
L 61-80
−14.5
28
@
UTC
L 79-86
+10.5
6
vs
UNCG
L 70-84
−0.5
over 13under 16avg −0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
UTSA
28 games played
Straight up
3-25
11% wins
Against the spread
10-18
36% covers · avg −3.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-15
46% overs · avg −1.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | vs | L 60-77 | -6.5 | L −23.5 | 153.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 69-80 | +2.5 | L −8.5 | 147.5 | O 149 |
| Nov 15 | @ | W 84-79 | +4.5 | W +9.5 | 148.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 50-61 | +2.5 | L −8.5 | 144.5 | U 111 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 77-64 | +3.5 | W +16.5 | 160.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 30 | vs | L 58-82 | +1.5 | L −22.5 | 141.5 | U 140 |
| Dec 7 | @ | L 55-97 | +33.5 | L −8.5 | 171.5 | U 152 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 64-88 | +22.5 | L −1.5 | 154.5 | U 152 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 70-97 | +25.5 | L −1.5 | 157.5 | O 167 |
| Dec 22 | vs | L 68-71 | +10.5 | W +7.5 | 148.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 31 | @ | L 70-110 | +16.5 | L −23.5 | 158.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 57-76 | +10.5 | L −8.5 | 149.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 58-74 | +6.5 | L −9.5 | 145.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 52-85 | +7.5 | L −25.5 | 147.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 73-89 | +6.5 | L −9.5 | 144.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 18 | @ | L 69-95 | +20.5 | L −5.5 | 147.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 62-81 | +15.5 | L −3.5 | 138.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 64-70 | +10.5 | W +4.5 | 145.5 | U 134 |
| Jan 28 | vs | L 73-83 | +12.5 | W +2.5 | 155.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 88-109 | +23.5 | W +2.5 | 164.5 | O 197 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 58-81 | +10.5 | L −12.5 | 141.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 11 | @ | L 72-88 | +10.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 15 | @ | W 88-79 | +13.5 | W +22.5 | 148.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 52-60 | +11.5 | W +3.5 | 157.5 | U 112 |
| Feb 22 | @ | L 74-100 | +21.5 | L −4.5 | 159.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 25 | vs | L 81-82 | +4.5 | W +3.5 | 153.5 | O 163 |
| Mar 1 | vs | L 67-84 | +15.5 | L −1.5 | 151.5 | U 151 |
| Mar 8 | @ | L 71-80 | +11.5 | W +2.5 | 151.5 | U 151 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
vs
SIUE
L 60-77
−23.5
12
@
TXST
L 69-80
−8.5
15
@
DEN
W 84-79
+9.5
24
vs
ACU
L 50-61
−8.5
25
vs
GASO
W 77-64
+16.5
30
vs
USA
L 58-82
−22.5
7
@
ALA
L 55-97
−8.5
13
@
COLO
L 64-88
−1.5
17
@
USC
L 70-97
−1.5
22
vs
SEA
L 68-71
+7.5
31
@
FAU
L 70-110
−23.5
3
@
TEM
L 57-76
−8.5
7
vs
CLT
L 58-74
−9.5
10
vs
TULN
L 52-85
−25.5
14
vs
RICE
L 73-89
−9.5
18
@
MEM
L 69-95
−5.5
21
@
UNT
L 62-81
−3.5
24
vs
TEM
L 64-70
+4.5
28
vs
UAB
L 73-83
+2.5
4
@
USF
L 88-109
+2.5
7
vs
UNT
L 58-81
−12.5
11
@
ECU
L 72-88
−5.5
15
@
CLT
W 88-79
+22.5
18
vs
FAU
L 52-60
+3.5
22
@
TLSA
L 74-100
−4.5
25
vs
ECU
L 81-82
+3.5
1
vs
WICH
L 67-84
−1.5
8
@
RICE
L 71-80
+2.5
covered 10didn’t cover 18avg −3.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
vs
SIUE
L 60-77
−16.5
12
@
TXST
L 69-80
+1.5
15
@
DEN
W 84-79
+14.5
24
vs
ACU
L 50-61
−33.5
25
vs
GASO
W 77-64
−19.5
30
vs
USA
L 58-82
−1.5
7
@
ALA
L 55-97
−19.5
13
@
COLO
L 64-88
−2.5
17
@
USC
L 70-97
+9.5
22
vs
SEA
L 68-71
−9.5
31
@
FAU
L 70-110
+21.5
3
@
TEM
L 57-76
−16.5
7
vs
CLT
L 58-74
−13.5
10
vs
TULN
L 52-85
−10.5
14
vs
RICE
L 73-89
+17.5
18
@
MEM
L 69-95
+16.5
21
@
UNT
L 62-81
+4.5
24
vs
TEM
L 64-70
−11.5
28
vs
UAB
L 73-83
+0.5
4
@
USF
L 88-109
+32.5
7
vs
UNT
L 58-81
−2.5
11
@
ECU
L 72-88
+9.5
15
@
CLT
W 88-79
+18.5
18
vs
FAU
L 52-60
−45.5
22
@
TLSA
L 74-100
+14.5
25
vs
ECU
L 81-82
+9.5
1
vs
WICH
L 67-84
−0.5
8
@
RICE
L 71-80
−0.5
over 13under 15avg −1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
UTSA has the better starters
Position by position: VMI 1, UTSA 2, even 2
VMIBetterUTSA
G A. Clark6.6 pts · 5.3 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 35
←VMISmall
G D. Hayes8.7 pts · 1.8 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 16
G W. Andrews3.9 pts · 0.7 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 20
→UTSASmall
G J. Kelly TR8.3 pts · 3.9 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 44
F T. Johnson18.1 pts · 7 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 75
=Even
G D. Williams TR10 pts · 3.2 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 72
F C. Liston4.7 pts · 2.8 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 2
→UTSASmall
G P. Turner TR7 pts · 1.5 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 31
F A. Daushvili6.8 pts · 4.2 reb · 1 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G I. Coleman TR6.4 pts · 3.8 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 50
VMIBetterUTSA
VMI offense288th of 366 · -8.9
=Even
UTSA defense238th of 366 · -6.2
VMI defense342nd of 366 · -9.1
→UTSABig
UTSA offense155th of 366 · -4.7
Backcourt-2.6 · 2 players
←VMISmall
Backcourt-5.4 · 5 players
Frontcourt-1.5 · 3 players
=No call
FrontcourtNo numbers yet
Bench-0.8 · 3 players
←VMISmall
Bench-3.5 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestVMI betterUTSA betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
A. Clark27 minW. Andrews12 minT. Johnson9 min · TRB. Edmonds2 minM. Lawson2 minR. BradleyNew
Forwards
T. Johnson37 minC. Liston22 minA. Daushvili17 minR. PetersNewP. NarvilasNewJ. PanzoNew
Guards
D. Hayes31 minJ. Kelly27 min · TRD. Williams22 min · TRP. Turner20 min · TRI. Coleman19 min · TRS. Eberwein19 min · TR
Forwards
A. Smith5 min · TRC. OkpukparaNewM. BroxtonNewJ. PetersonNewK. TaylorNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 68.5 #306 | Points per game | 67.3 #329 |
| 1.01 #311 | Points per possession | 0.96 #348 |
| 67.6 #251 | Pace (possessions) | 69.6 #142 |
| Shooting | ||
| 47.5 #325 | Effective FG% | 44.8 #360 |
| 31.5 #306 | 3-point % | 29.2 #351 |
| 53.6 #2 | 3-point attempt rate | 41.3 #143 |
| 30.6 #293 | Free throw rate | 29.5 #320 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.3 #88 | Turnover rate | 17.4 #231 |
| 25.6 #330 | Offensive rebound rate | 30.2 #191 |
| 11.6 #309 | Assists per game | 10.1 #357 |
| Defense | ||
| 83.2 #348 | Points allowed | 82.9 #345 |
| 1.23 #362 | Points allowed per possession | 1.20 #356 |
| 57.0 #357 | Opponent effective FG% | 53.3 #277 |
| 36.5 #327 | Opponent 3-point % | 35.1 #251 |
| 15.7 #239 | Turnovers forced | 14.7 #309 |
| 62.8 #360 | Defensive rebound rate | 61.3 #363 |
| 6.6 #160 | Steals per game | 6.3 #203 |
| 2.0 #343 | Blocks per game | 4.3 #52 |
VMI
3-26 in 2025-26 overall · 1-18 in conference · Southern Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs UNC Greensboro70–84
- L@ Chattanooga79–86
- L@ Samford61–80
- Lvs W Carolina62–81
- L@ Wofford76–82
A week or more of rest.
UTSA
3-25 in 2025-26 overall · 1-17 in conference · American Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Rice71–80
- Lvs Wichita St67–84
- Lvs East Carolina81–82
- L@ Tulsa74–100
- Lvs FAU52–60
A week or more of rest.