McCarthey Athletic Center · at Gonzaga
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | GONZ | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects GONZ 89–63 · win probability GONZ 99%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 151.3
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: GONZ has more of the edges
NMSU 0, GONZ 8 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Turnovers
Turnover rate: NMSU 15.0%, GONZ 13.7%. Forced: NMSU 14.7%, GONZ 19.9%
Shooting
Effective FG%: NMSU 48.5 and allows 48.7; GONZ 55.6 and allows 46.3
NMSU offense vs GONZ defense
Offense 151st of 366 against a defense 21st, on the model’s ratings
GONZ offense vs NMSU defense
Offense 14th of 366 against a defense 125th, on the model’s ratings
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: NMSU 32.5%, GONZ 34.8%. Defensive: NMSU 69.7%, GONZ 74.3%
Context
Schedule so far
NMSU has played the 174th-hardest schedule, GONZ the 84th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Free throws
Free throw rate: NMSU 34.9, GONZ 31.0. Allowed: NMSU 44.2, GONZ 30.9
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: NMSU plays 68.1 a game (224th fastest), GONZ 70.4 (98th). Faster games mean more points
Three-pointers
NMSU hits 32.4% and allows 32.4%; GONZ hits 33.3% and allows 30.6%. Threes are 38.7% and 30.8% of their shots
Home court
GONZ at home. This season: GONZ 0-0 at home, NMSU 0-0 away
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: NMSU 22%, GONZ 21%. Transfers in: NMSU 6, GONZ 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | GONZ -25.7 | — |
| Total | — | 151.3 | — |
| Projected score | — | NMSU 62.8 · GONZ 88.5 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | GONZ -15.2 | — |
| 1H total | 70.7 | — |
| 1H projected score | NMSU 27.8 · GONZ 43 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | |
| 8-2 80% | 5-5 50% | 1-9 10% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
New Mexico St
29 games played
Straight up
13-16
45% wins
Against the spread
14-15
48% covers · avg −1.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-13
55% overs · avg +2.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15 | vs | W 76-68 | +3.5 | W +11.5 | 139.5 | O 144 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 81-72 | -8.5 | W +0.5 | 145.5 | O 153 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 57-45 | +2.5 | W +14.5 | 139.5 | U 102 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 77-58 | -12.5 | W +6.5 | 136.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 2 | vs | L 75-77 | -2.5 | L −4.5 | 135.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 69-77 | -1.5 | L −9.5 | 131.5 | O 146 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 70-83 | +4.5 | L −8.5 | 146.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 87-78 | -5.5 | W +3.5 | 153.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 2 | @ | L 74-89 | -1.5 | L −16.5 | 157.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 82-89 | +1.5 | L −5.5 | 134.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 80-64 | -2.5 | W +13.5 | 154.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 55-59 | -3.5 | L −7.5 | 144.5 | U 114 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 71-73 | +8.5 | W +6.5 | 145.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 97-68 | -4.5 | W +24.5 | 134.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 22 | vs | L 75-84 | -6.5 | L −15.5 | 144.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 78-81 | -7.5 | L −10.5 | 159.5 | U 159 |
| Jan 28 | vs | L 64-73 | -13.5 | L −22.5 | 137.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 53-76 | +3.5 | L −19.5 | 159.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 4 | @ | W 72-63 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 135.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 88-91 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 138.5 | O 179 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 75-77 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 144.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 79-70 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 139.5 | O 149 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 67-63 | -7.5 | L −3.5 | 142.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 70-93 | +4.5 | L −18.5 | 151.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 85-86 | +5.5 | W +4.5 | 148.5 | O 171 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 77-75 | -6.5 | L −4.5 | 145.5 | O 152 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 79-76 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 157.5 | U 155 |
| Mar 10 | vs | W 68-63 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 141.5 | U 131 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 61-69 | +4.5 | L −3.5 | 154.5 | U 130 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
15
vs
UNM
W 76-68
+11.5
21
vs
SAM
W 81-72
+0.5
25
vs
UCI
W 57-45
+14.5
26
vs
GAST
W 77-58
+6.5
2
vs
USA
L 75-77
−4.5
6
@
ACU
L 69-77
−9.5
13
vs
TLSA
L 70-83
−8.5
21
vs
SHSU
W 87-78
+3.5
2
@
FIU
L 74-89
−16.5
4
@
MOST
L 82-89
−5.5
8
vs
WKU
W 80-64
+13.5
10
vs
MTSU
L 55-59
−7.5
15
@
LIB
L 71-73
+6.5
17
@
DEL
W 97-68
+24.5
22
vs
MOST
L 75-84
−15.5
24
vs
FIU
L 78-81
−10.5
28
vs
DEL
L 64-73
−22.5
31
@
KENN
L 53-76
−19.5
4
@
LT
W 72-63
+10.5
7
@
UTEP
L 88-91
−4.5
11
vs
LIB
L 75-77
+1.5
14
@
JXST
W 79-70
+10.5
21
vs
UTEP
W 67-63
−3.5
26
@
WKU
L 70-93
−18.5
28
@
MTSU
L 85-86
+4.5
5
vs
JXST
W 77-75
−4.5
7
vs
KENN
W 79-76
+1.5
10
vs
JXST
W 68-63
+3.5
11
vs
SHSU
L 61-69
−3.5
covered 14didn’t cover 15avg −1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
15
vs
UNM
W 76-68
+4.5
21
vs
SAM
W 81-72
+7.5
25
vs
UCI
W 57-45
−37.5
26
vs
GAST
W 77-58
−1.5
2
vs
USA
L 75-77
+16.5
6
@
ACU
L 69-77
+14.5
13
vs
TLSA
L 70-83
+6.5
21
vs
SHSU
W 87-78
+11.5
2
@
FIU
L 74-89
+5.5
4
@
MOST
L 82-89
+36.5
8
vs
WKU
W 80-64
−10.5
10
vs
MTSU
L 55-59
−30.5
15
@
LIB
L 71-73
−1.5
17
@
DEL
W 97-68
+30.5
22
vs
MOST
L 75-84
+14.5
24
vs
FIU
L 78-81
−0.5
28
vs
DEL
L 64-73
−0.5
31
@
KENN
L 53-76
−30.5
4
@
LT
W 72-63
−0.5
7
@
UTEP
L 88-91
+40.5
11
vs
LIB
L 75-77
+7.5
14
@
JXST
W 79-70
+9.5
21
vs
UTEP
W 67-63
−12.5
26
@
WKU
L 70-93
+11.5
28
@
MTSU
L 85-86
+22.5
5
vs
JXST
W 77-75
+6.5
7
vs
KENN
W 79-76
−2.5
10
vs
JXST
W 68-63
−10.5
11
vs
SHSU
L 61-69
−24.5
over 16under 13avg +2.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Gonzaga
35 games played
Straight up
31-4
89% wins
Against the spread
18-17
51% covers · avg +0.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
11-24
31% overs · avg −5.1 pts vs the total
Against the spread
18-1751%
2 straight misses ATS1 of last 4 covered
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 98-43 | -29.5 | W +25.5 | 157.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 83-68 | -10.5 | W +4.5 | 166.5 | U 151 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 90-63 | -12.5 | W +14.5 | 164.5 | U 153 |
| Nov 14 | @ | W 77-65 | -13.5 | L −1.5 | 158.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 17 | vs | W 122-50 | -35.5 | W +36.5 | 160.5 | O 172 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 95-85 | -4.5 | W +5.5 | 178.5 | O 180 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 100-61 | -14.5 | W +24.5 | 157.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 61-101 | -3.5 | L −43.5 | 165.5 | U 162 |
| Dec 5 | vs | W 94-59 | -5.5 | W +29.5 | 159.5 | U 153 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 109-58 | -42.5 | W +8.5 | 166.5 | O 167 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 82-72 | -10.5 | L −0.5 | 147.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 98-70 | -36.5 | L −8.5 | 160.5 | O 168 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 91-82 | -12.5 | L −3.5 | 155.5 | O 173 |
| Dec 28 | @ | W 96-56 | -29.5 | W +10.5 | 152.5 | U 152 |
| Dec 30 | @ | W 99-93 | -29.5 | L −23.5 | 160.5 | O 192 |
| Jan 2 | vs | W 80-72 | -24.5 | L −16.5 | 155.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 82-47 | -25.5 | W +9.5 | 154.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 89-77 | -17.5 | L −5.5 | 163.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 15 | @ | W 86-65 | -16.5 | W +4.5 | 155.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 71-50 | -9.5 | W +11.5 | 150.5 | U 121 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 84-60 | -28.5 | L −4.5 | 150.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 68-66 | -15.5 | L −13.5 | 149.5 | U 134 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 73-65 | -8.5 | L −0.5 | 144.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 80-87 | -22.5 | L −29.5 | 152.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 81-61 | -19.5 | W +0.5 | 149.5 | U 142 |
| Feb 10 | vs | W 83-53 | -21.5 | W +8.5 | 156.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 94-86 | -4.5 | W +3.5 | 158.5 | O 180 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 80-59 | -15.5 | W +5.5 | 151.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 71-62 | -22.5 | L −13.5 | 144.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 89-48 | -26.5 | W +14.5 | 150.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 59-70 | -2.5 | L −13.5 | 143.5 | U 129 |
| Mar 9 | vs | W 65-56 | -20.5 | L −11.5 | 145.5 | U 121 |
| Mar 10 | vs | W 79-68 | -8.5 | W +2.5 | 157.5 | U 147 |
| Mar 19 | vs | W 73-64 | -20.5 | L −11.5 | 152.5 | U 137 |
| Mar 21 | vs | L 68-74 | -5.5 | L −11.5 | 146.5 | U 142 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
TXSO
W 98-43
+25.5
8
vs
OU
W 83-68
+4.5
11
vs
CREI
W 90-63
+14.5
14
@
ASU
W 77-65
−1.5
17
vs
SUU
W 122-50
+36.5
24
vs
ALA
W 95-85
+5.5
25
vs
MD
W 100-61
+24.5
26
vs
MICH
L 61-101
−43.5
5
vs
UK
W 94-59
+29.5
7
vs
UNF
W 109-58
+8.5
13
vs
UCLA
W 82-72
−0.5
17
vs
CAM
W 98-70
−8.5
21
vs
ORE
W 91-82
−3.5
28
@
PEPP
W 96-56
+10.5
30
@
USD
W 99-93
−23.5
2
vs
SEA
W 80-72
−16.5
4
vs
LMU
W 82-47
+9.5
8
vs
SCU
W 89-77
−5.5
15
@
WSU
W 86-65
+4.5
17
@
SEA
W 71-50
+11.5
21
vs
PEPP
W 84-60
−4.5
24
vs
SF
W 68-66
−13.5
31
vs
SMC
W 73-65
−0.5
4
@
PORT
L 80-87
−29.5
7
@
ORST
W 81-61
+0.5
10
vs
WSU
W 83-53
+8.5
14
@
SCU
W 94-86
+3.5
18
@
SF
W 80-59
+5.5
21
vs
PAC
W 71-62
−13.5
25
vs
PORT
W 89-48
+14.5
28
@
SMC
L 59-70
−13.5
9
vs
ORST
W 65-56
−11.5
10
vs
SCU
W 79-68
+2.5
19
vs
KENN
W 73-64
−11.5
21
vs
TEX
L 68-74
−11.5
covered 18didn’t cover 17avg +0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
TXSO
W 98-43
−16.5
8
vs
OU
W 83-68
−15.5
11
vs
CREI
W 90-63
−11.5
14
@
ASU
W 77-65
−16.5
17
vs
SUU
W 122-50
+11.5
24
vs
ALA
W 95-85
+1.5
25
vs
MD
W 100-61
+3.5
26
vs
MICH
L 61-101
−3.5
5
vs
UK
W 94-59
−6.5
7
vs
UNF
W 109-58
+0.5
13
vs
UCLA
W 82-72
+6.5
17
vs
CAM
W 98-70
+7.5
21
vs
ORE
W 91-82
+17.5
28
@
PEPP
W 96-56
−0.5
30
@
USD
W 99-93
+31.5
2
vs
SEA
W 80-72
−3.5
4
vs
LMU
W 82-47
−25.5
8
vs
SCU
W 89-77
+2.5
15
@
WSU
W 86-65
−4.5
17
@
SEA
W 71-50
−29.5
21
vs
PEPP
W 84-60
−6.5
24
vs
SF
W 68-66
−15.5
31
vs
SMC
W 73-65
−6.5
4
@
PORT
L 80-87
+14.5
7
@
ORST
W 81-61
−7.5
10
vs
WSU
W 83-53
−20.5
14
@
SCU
W 94-86
+21.5
18
@
SF
W 80-59
−12.5
21
vs
PAC
W 71-62
−11.5
25
vs
PORT
W 89-48
−13.5
28
@
SMC
L 59-70
−14.5
9
vs
ORST
W 65-56
−24.5
10
vs
SCU
W 79-68
−10.5
19
vs
KENN
W 73-64
−15.5
21
vs
TEX
L 68-74
−4.5
over 11under 24avg −5.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Gonzaga has the better starters
Position by position: New Mexico St 0, Gonzaga 5, even 0
New Mexico StBetterGonzaga
G J. Washington TR11.3 pts · 1.9 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 34
→GONZBig
G J. Bennett TR15.8 pts · 2.2 reb · 2.9 ast
Score 85
G G. Warren TR12.5 pts · 4.6 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 68
→GONZSmall
G X. Lee TR11.6 pts · 3.7 reb · 4.2 ast
Score 94
G D. Dudley TR14.2 pts · 2.8 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 65
→GONZSmall
F C. Wiggins TR13.3 pts · 3.9 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 81
F M. Lavrenov TR10.5 pts · 7.3 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 40
→GONZBig
F B. Huff17.8 pts · 5.6 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 99
F J. Osborne6.3 pts · 4.8 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 42
→GONZBig
C M. Diop TR13.6 pts · 5.8 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 86
New Mexico StBetterGonzaga
NMSU offense151st of 366 · -4.6
→GONZBig
GONZ defense21st of 366 · +5.3
NMSU defense125th of 366 · -2.3
→GONZSmall
GONZ offense14th of 366 · +9.4
Backcourt-1.3 · 3 players
→GONZBig
Backcourt+5.5 · 2 players
Frontcourt-1.5 · 2 players
→GONZBig
Frontcourt+12.3 · 3 players
Bench-2.2 · 3 players
→GONZBig
Bench+2.8 · 2 players
Score, worst to bestNMSU betterGONZ betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Washington35 min · TRG. Warren32 min · TRD. Dudley31 min · TRG. Pickens21 minK. RobinsonNewD. GrantNew
Forwards
M. Lavrenov28 min · TRJ. Osborne24 minS. Payne20 min · TRL. Levillain20 min · TRP. WoodsonNew
Centers
A. DiongueNew
Guards
J. Bennett35 min · TRX. Lee27 min · TRD. Fogle17 minI. Harwell14 min · TRN. De SousaNewA. MetzNew
Forwards
C. Wiggins28 min · TRB. Huff26 minI. AlmansaNewP. JeffersonNewS. FunchesNewL. FosterNew
Centers
M. Diop30 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 73.8 #207 | Points per game | 84.3 #17 |
| 1.08 #179 | Points per possession | 1.20 #13 |
| 68.1 #224 | Pace (possessions) | 70.4 #98 |
| Shooting | ||
| 48.5 #302 | Effective FG% | 55.6 #25 |
| 32.4 #257 | 3-point % | 33.3 #212 |
| 38.7 #198 | 3-point attempt rate | 30.8 #342 |
| 34.9 #186 | Free throw rate | 31.0 #282 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.0 #66 | Turnover rate | 13.7 #17 |
| 32.5 #105 | Offensive rebound rate | 34.8 #52 |
| 12.5 #250 | Assists per game | 18.4 #7 |
| Defense | ||
| 73.8 #150 | Points allowed | 66.2 #15 |
| 1.08 #179 | Points allowed per possession | 0.94 #1 |
| 48.7 #52 | Opponent effective FG% | 46.3 #15 |
| 32.4 #83 | Opponent 3-point % | 30.6 #23 |
| 14.7 #311 | Turnovers forced | 19.9 #25 |
| 69.7 #175 | Defensive rebound rate | 74.3 #16 |
| 5.7 #276 | Steals per game | 8.4 #23 |
| 3.0 #221 | Blocks per game | 3.7 #116 |
New Mexico St
13-16 in 2025-26 overall · 9-13 in conference · Conference USA
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Sam Houston61–69
- Wvs Jax State68–63
- Wvs Kennesaw St79–76
- Wvs Jax State77–75
- L@ MTSU85–86
A week or more of rest.
Gonzaga
31-4 in 2025-26 overall · 18-2 in conference · Pac-12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Texas68–74
- Wvs Kennesaw St73–64
- Wvs Santa Clara79–68
- Wvs Oregon St65–56
- L@ Saint Mary's59–70
A week or more of rest.