Don Haskins Center · at UTEP
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | UTEP | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects NMSU 73–71 · win probability NMSU 55%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 144.2
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: NMSU has more of the edges
NMSU 3, UTEP 1 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: NMSU 32.5%, UTEP 26.2%. Defensive: NMSU 69.7%, UTEP 67.2%
UTEP offense vs NMSU defense
Offense 226th of 366 against a defense 125th, on the model’s ratings
Shooting
Effective FG%: NMSU 48.5 and allows 48.7; UTEP 48.3 and allows 51.5
Home court
UTEP at home. This season: UTEP 0-0 at home, NMSU 0-0 away
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: NMSU 22%, UTEP 0%. Transfers in: NMSU 6, UTEP 7. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Tempo
About 67 possessions: NMSU plays 68.1 a game (224th fastest), UTEP 66.6 (291st). Faster games mean more points
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: NMSU 15.0%, UTEP 17.4%. Forced: NMSU 14.7%, UTEP 18.0%
Even
NMSU offense vs UTEP defense
Offense 151st of 366 against a defense 173rd, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
NMSU has played the 174th-hardest schedule, UTEP the 163rd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Three-pointers
NMSU hits 32.4% and allows 32.4%; UTEP hits 33.9% and allows 34.0%. Threes are 38.7% and 40.3% of their shots
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: NMSU 34.9, UTEP 33.4. Allowed: NMSU 44.2, UTEP 42.0
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | NMSU -1.4 | — |
| Total | — | 144.2 | — |
| Projected score | — | NMSU 72.8 · UTEP 71.4 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | NMSU -0.9 | — |
| 1H total | 67.5 | — |
| 1H projected score | NMSU 34.2 · UTEP 33.3 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | |
| 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 10 since 2021-22
NMSU 6–4 UTEPNMSU leads · 10 games since 2021-22 · NMSU 4-6 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2025-26 | UTEP 63 @ NMSU 67 | NMSU -7.5 | UTEP W |
| Feb 7, 2025-26 | NMSU 88 @ UTEP 91 | UTEP +1.5 | UTEP W |
| Feb 8, 2024-25 | UTEP 66 @ NMSU 63 | NMSU -0.5 | UTEP W |
| Jan 11, 2024-25 | NMSU 85 @ UTEP 57 | UTEP -6.5 | NMSU W |
| Feb 10, 2023-24 | NMSU 49 @ UTEP 74 | UTEP -5.5 | UTEP W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
New Mexico St
29 games played
Straight up
13-16
45% wins
Against the spread
14-15
48% covers · avg −1.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-13
55% overs · avg +2.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15 | vs | W 76-68 | +3.5 | W +11.5 | 139.5 | O 144 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 81-72 | -8.5 | W +0.5 | 145.5 | O 153 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 57-45 | +2.5 | W +14.5 | 139.5 | U 102 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 77-58 | -12.5 | W +6.5 | 136.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 2 | vs | L 75-77 | -2.5 | L −4.5 | 135.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 69-77 | -1.5 | L −9.5 | 131.5 | O 146 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 70-83 | +4.5 | L −8.5 | 146.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 87-78 | -5.5 | W +3.5 | 153.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 2 | @ | L 74-89 | -1.5 | L −16.5 | 157.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 82-89 | +1.5 | L −5.5 | 134.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 80-64 | -2.5 | W +13.5 | 154.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 55-59 | -3.5 | L −7.5 | 144.5 | U 114 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 71-73 | +8.5 | W +6.5 | 145.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 97-68 | -4.5 | W +24.5 | 134.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 22 | vs | L 75-84 | -6.5 | L −15.5 | 144.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 78-81 | -7.5 | L −10.5 | 159.5 | U 159 |
| Jan 28 | vs | L 64-73 | -13.5 | L −22.5 | 137.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 53-76 | +3.5 | L −19.5 | 159.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 4 | @ | W 72-63 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 135.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 88-91 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 138.5 | O 179 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 75-77 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 144.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 79-70 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 139.5 | O 149 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 67-63 | -7.5 | L −3.5 | 142.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 70-93 | +4.5 | L −18.5 | 151.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 85-86 | +5.5 | W +4.5 | 148.5 | O 171 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 77-75 | -6.5 | L −4.5 | 145.5 | O 152 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 79-76 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 157.5 | U 155 |
| Mar 10 | vs | W 68-63 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 141.5 | U 131 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 61-69 | +4.5 | L −3.5 | 154.5 | U 130 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
15
vs
UNM
W 76-68
+11.5
21
vs
SAM
W 81-72
+0.5
25
vs
UCI
W 57-45
+14.5
26
vs
GAST
W 77-58
+6.5
2
vs
USA
L 75-77
−4.5
6
@
ACU
L 69-77
−9.5
13
vs
TLSA
L 70-83
−8.5
21
vs
SHSU
W 87-78
+3.5
2
@
FIU
L 74-89
−16.5
4
@
MOST
L 82-89
−5.5
8
vs
WKU
W 80-64
+13.5
10
vs
MTSU
L 55-59
−7.5
15
@
LIB
L 71-73
+6.5
17
@
DEL
W 97-68
+24.5
22
vs
MOST
L 75-84
−15.5
24
vs
FIU
L 78-81
−10.5
28
vs
DEL
L 64-73
−22.5
31
@
KENN
L 53-76
−19.5
4
@
LT
W 72-63
+10.5
7
@
UTEP
L 88-91
−4.5
11
vs
LIB
L 75-77
+1.5
14
@
JXST
W 79-70
+10.5
21
vs
UTEP
W 67-63
−3.5
26
@
WKU
L 70-93
−18.5
28
@
MTSU
L 85-86
+4.5
5
vs
JXST
W 77-75
−4.5
7
vs
KENN
W 79-76
+1.5
10
vs
JXST
W 68-63
+3.5
11
vs
SHSU
L 61-69
−3.5
covered 14didn’t cover 15avg −1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
15
vs
UNM
W 76-68
+4.5
21
vs
SAM
W 81-72
+7.5
25
vs
UCI
W 57-45
−37.5
26
vs
GAST
W 77-58
−1.5
2
vs
USA
L 75-77
+16.5
6
@
ACU
L 69-77
+14.5
13
vs
TLSA
L 70-83
+6.5
21
vs
SHSU
W 87-78
+11.5
2
@
FIU
L 74-89
+5.5
4
@
MOST
L 82-89
+36.5
8
vs
WKU
W 80-64
−10.5
10
vs
MTSU
L 55-59
−30.5
15
@
LIB
L 71-73
−1.5
17
@
DEL
W 97-68
+30.5
22
vs
MOST
L 75-84
+14.5
24
vs
FIU
L 78-81
−0.5
28
vs
DEL
L 64-73
−0.5
31
@
KENN
L 53-76
−30.5
4
@
LT
W 72-63
−0.5
7
@
UTEP
L 88-91
+40.5
11
vs
LIB
L 75-77
+7.5
14
@
JXST
W 79-70
+9.5
21
vs
UTEP
W 67-63
−12.5
26
@
WKU
L 70-93
+11.5
28
@
MTSU
L 85-86
+22.5
5
vs
JXST
W 77-75
+6.5
7
vs
KENN
W 79-76
−2.5
10
vs
JXST
W 68-63
−10.5
11
vs
SHSU
L 61-69
−24.5
over 16under 13avg +2.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
UTEP
28 games played
Straight up
8-20
29% wins
Against the spread
13-15
46% covers · avg −1.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-15
46% overs · avg −1.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 11 | vs | L 58-71 | -1.5 | L −14.5 | 144.5 | U 129 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 51-75 | +16.5 | L −7.5 | 149.5 | U 126 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 63-74 | +2.5 | L −8.5 | 159.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 59-75 | +8.5 | L −7.5 | 146.5 | U 134 |
| Dec 7 | @ | L 68-75 | +12.5 | W +5.5 | 136.5 | O 143 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 61-66 | +12.5 | W +7.5 | 138.5 | U 127 |
| Dec 21 | vs | L 71-72 | -10.5 | L −11.5 | 136.5 | O 143 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 76-66 | +2.5 | W +12.5 | 139.5 | O 142 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 63-75 | +2.5 | L −9.5 | 130.5 | O 138 |
| Jan 2 | @ | L 55-79 | +3.5 | L −20.5 | 131.5 | O 134 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 64-76 | +6.5 | L −5.5 | 152.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 83-80 | +3.5 | W +6.5 | 137.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 56-68 | +3.5 | L −8.5 | 144.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 15 | @ | W 70-69 | +1.5 | W +2.5 | 125.5 | O 139 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 69-80 | +13.5 | W +2.5 | 137.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 83-77 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 151.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 57-62 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 139.5 | U 119 |
| Jan 28 | vs | L 59-69 | -2.5 | L −12.5 | 130.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 70-55 | -6.5 | W +8.5 | 128.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 66-70 | +10.5 | W +6.5 | 145.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 91-88 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 138.5 | O 179 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 69-64 | +6.5 | W +11.5 | 134.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 64-73 | +6.5 | L −2.5 | 139.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 63-67 | +7.5 | W +3.5 | 142.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 67-77 | +8.5 | L −1.5 | 139.5 | O 144 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 65-97 | +9.5 | L −22.5 | 145.5 | O 162 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 78-71 | +3.5 | W +10.5 | 148.5 | O 149 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 61-64 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 139.5 | U 125 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
11
vs
LMU
L 58-71
−14.5
15
@
USU
L 51-75
−7.5
24
vs
W&M
L 63-74
−8.5
25
vs
UAB
L 59-75
−7.5
7
@
SEA
L 68-75
+5.5
13
@
HAW
L 61-66
+7.5
21
vs
NORF
L 71-72
−11.5
22
vs
NDSU
W 76-66
+12.5
29
@
LT
L 63-75
−9.5
2
@
MOST
L 55-79
−20.5
4
@
FIU
L 64-76
−5.5
8
vs
MTSU
W 83-80
+6.5
10
vs
WKU
L 56-68
−8.5
15
@
DEL
W 70-69
+2.5
17
@
LIB
L 69-80
+2.5
22
vs
FIU
W 83-77
+7.5
24
vs
MOST
L 57-62
−3.5
28
vs
LT
L 59-69
−12.5
31
vs
DEL
W 70-55
+8.5
4
@
SHSU
L 66-70
+6.5
7
vs
NMSU
W 91-88
+4.5
11
@
JXST
W 69-64
+11.5
14
vs
LIB
L 64-73
−2.5
21
@
NMSU
L 63-67
+3.5
26
@
MTSU
L 67-77
−1.5
28
@
WKU
L 65-97
−22.5
5
vs
KENN
W 78-71
+10.5
7
vs
JXST
L 61-64
−1.5
covered 13didn’t cover 15avg −1.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
11
vs
LMU
L 58-71
−15.5
15
@
USU
L 51-75
−23.5
24
vs
W&M
L 63-74
−22.5
25
vs
UAB
L 59-75
−12.5
7
@
SEA
L 68-75
+6.5
13
@
HAW
L 61-66
−11.5
21
vs
NORF
L 71-72
+6.5
22
vs
NDSU
W 76-66
+2.5
29
@
LT
L 63-75
+7.5
2
@
MOST
L 55-79
+2.5
4
@
FIU
L 64-76
−12.5
8
vs
MTSU
W 83-80
+25.5
10
vs
WKU
L 56-68
−20.5
15
@
DEL
W 70-69
+13.5
17
@
LIB
L 69-80
+11.5
22
vs
FIU
W 83-77
+8.5
24
vs
MOST
L 57-62
−20.5
28
vs
LT
L 59-69
−2.5
31
vs
DEL
W 70-55
−3.5
4
@
SHSU
L 66-70
−9.5
7
vs
NMSU
W 91-88
+40.5
11
@
JXST
W 69-64
−1.5
14
vs
LIB
L 64-73
−2.5
21
@
NMSU
L 63-67
−12.5
26
@
MTSU
L 67-77
+4.5
28
@
WKU
L 65-97
+16.5
5
vs
KENN
W 78-71
+0.5
7
vs
JXST
L 61-64
−14.5
over 13under 15avg −1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
New Mexico St has the better starters
Position by position: New Mexico St 1, UTEP 0, even 4
New Mexico StBetterUTEP
G J. Washington TR11.3 pts · 1.9 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 34
=Even
G L. Moeller TR11.1 pts · 3.7 reb · 3.7 ast
Score 46
G G. Warren TR12.5 pts · 4.6 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 68
←NMSUBig
G J. Whiting TR10.8 pts · 3.4 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 31
G D. Dudley TR14.2 pts · 2.8 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 65
=Even
G R. Miller TR12.3 pts · 2.6 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 66
F M. Lavrenov TR10.5 pts · 7.3 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 40
=Even
G R. Jackson TR6.7 pts · 2.9 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 53
F J. Osborne6.3 pts · 4.8 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 42
=Even
F R. Cason TR3.9 pts · 3.4 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 43
New Mexico StBetterUTEP
NMSU offense151st of 366 · -4.6
=Even
UTEP defense173rd of 366 · -3.9
NMSU defense125th of 366 · -2.3
←NMSUSmall
UTEP offense226th of 366 · -6.9
Backcourt-1.3 · 3 players
←NMSUSmall
Backcourt-3.1 · 4 players
Frontcourt-1.5 · 2 players
→UTEPSmall
Frontcourt-0.4 · 1 player
Bench-2.2 · 3 players
→UTEPSmall
Bench-1.1 · 2 players
Score, worst to bestNMSU betterUTEP betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Washington35 min · TRG. Warren32 min · TRD. Dudley31 min · TRG. Pickens21 minK. RobinsonNewD. GrantNew
Forwards
M. Lavrenov28 min · TRJ. Osborne24 minS. Payne20 min · TRL. Levillain20 min · TRP. WoodsonNew
Centers
A. DiongueNew
Guards
L. Moeller33 min · TRJ. Whiting32 min · TRR. Miller25 min · TRR. Jackson18 min · TRC. McDanielsNewD. CrissNew
Forwards
R. Cason15 min · TRA. Cassia10 min · TRJ. Ratowski7 min · TRM. KelvinNewI. WardNewI. PerasovicNew
Centers
D. TarpleyNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 73.8 #207 | Points per game | 66.4 #340 |
| 1.08 #179 | Points per possession | 1.00 #326 |
| 68.1 #224 | Pace (possessions) | 66.6 #291 |
| Shooting | ||
| 48.5 #302 | Effective FG% | 48.3 #309 |
| 32.4 #257 | 3-point % | 33.9 #178 |
| 38.7 #198 | 3-point attempt rate | 40.3 #163 |
| 34.9 #186 | Free throw rate | 33.4 #227 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.0 #66 | Turnover rate | 17.4 #229 |
| 32.5 #105 | Offensive rebound rate | 26.2 #319 |
| 12.5 #250 | Assists per game | 11.0 #338 |
| Defense | ||
| 73.8 #150 | Points allowed | 72.7 #125 |
| 1.08 #179 | Points allowed per possession | 1.09 #196 |
| 48.7 #52 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.5 #187 |
| 32.4 #83 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.0 #182 |
| 14.7 #311 | Turnovers forced | 18.0 #98 |
| 69.7 #175 | Defensive rebound rate | 67.2 #293 |
| 5.7 #276 | Steals per game | 7.1 #113 |
| 3.0 #221 | Blocks per game | 3.5 #149 |
New Mexico St
13-16 in 2025-26 overall · 9-13 in conference · Conference USA
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Sam Houston61–69
- Wvs Jax State68–63
- Wvs Kennesaw St79–76
- Wvs Jax State77–75
- L@ MTSU85–86
A week or more of rest.
UTEP
8-20 in 2025-26 overall · 7-13 in conference · Mountain West Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Jax State61–64
- Wvs Kennesaw St78–71
- L@ Western KY65–97
- L@ MTSU67–77
- L@ New Mexico St63–67
A week or more of rest.