CFSB Center · at Murray St
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | MUR | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects MUR 82–67 · win probability MUR 90%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 149.0
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: MUR has more of the edges
NWST 0, MUR 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: NWST plays 65.4 a game (334th fastest), MUR 72.3 (30th). Faster games mean more points
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: NWST 26.1%, MUR 32.6%. Defensive: NWST 67.4%, MUR 68.7%
NWST offense vs MUR defense
Offense 340th of 366 against a defense 197th, on the model’s ratings
Shooting
Effective FG%: NWST 48.6 and allows 53.0; MUR 53.8 and allows 52.4
Context
Schedule so far
NWST has played the 292nd-hardest schedule, MUR the 165th. A record against a soft schedule means less
MUR offense vs NWST defense
Offense 110th of 366 against a defense 236th, on the model’s ratings
Home court
MUR at home. This season: MUR 0-0 at home, NWST 0-0 away
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: NWST 40.1, MUR 38.6. Allowed: NWST 36.3, MUR 32.2
Even
Three-pointers
NWST hits 33.2% and allows 35.5%; MUR hits 35.0% and allows 36.2%. Threes are 33.9% and 44.8% of their shots
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: NWST 18.3%, MUR 16.4%. Forced: NWST 16.9%, MUR 15.7%
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: NWST 28%, MUR 28%. Transfers in: NWST 2, MUR 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | MUR -14.7 | — |
| Total | — | 149.0 | — |
| Projected score | — | NWST 67.2 · MUR 81.9 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | MUR -8.6 | — |
| 1H total | 69.7 | — |
| 1H projected score | NWST 30.5 · MUR 39.2 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% | |
| 4-6 40% | 2-8 20% | 6-4 60% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
N'Western St
30 games played
Straight up
8-22
27% wins
Against the spread
17-13
57% covers · avg +0.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-15
50% overs · avg −2.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 68-98 | +21.5 | L −8.5 | 153.5 | O 166 |
| Nov 6 | @ | L 53-80 | +11.5 | L −15.5 | 137.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 83-87 | +6.5 | W +2.5 | 142.5 | O 170 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 64-84 | +16.5 | L −3.5 | 143.5 | O 148 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 72-85 | +18.5 | W +5.5 | 147.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 29 | vs | L 73-75 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 144.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 5 | @ | L 54-92 | +19.5 | L −18.5 | 139.5 | O 146 |
| Dec 7 | @ | W 76-68 | +7.5 | W +15.5 | 133.5 | O 144 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 70-79 | +19.5 | W +10.5 | 145.5 | O 149 |
| Dec 29 | vs | L 61-76 | +3.5 | L −11.5 | 138.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 64-74 | +8.5 | L −1.5 | 138.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 74-68 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 149.5 | U 142 |
| Jan 5 | @ | L 72-74 | +8.5 | W +6.5 | 144.5 | O 146 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 79-78 | +5.5 | W +6.5 | 138.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 12 | vs | W 64-63 | +2.5 | W +3.5 | 143.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 74-76 | +8.5 | W +6.5 | 141.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 19 | @ | L 80-82 | +2.5 | W +0.5 | 139.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 27 | @ | L 67-69 | +14.5 | W +12.5 | 141.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 64-75 | +4.5 | L −6.5 | 153.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 2 | vs | L 58-61 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 147.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 68-74 | -3.5 | L −9.5 | 143.5 | U 142 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 48-52 | +1.5 | L −2.5 | 140.5 | U 100 |
| Feb 9 | @ | W 70-68 | +6.5 | W +8.5 | 135.5 | O 138 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 69-66 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 131.5 | O 135 |
| Feb 16 | vs | L 64-75 | +14.5 | W +3.5 | 138.5 | O 139 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 71-53 | -2.5 | W +15.5 | 134.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 23 | vs | W 54-49 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 138.5 | U 103 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 59-71 | +5.5 | L −6.5 | 134.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 2 | @ | L 62-74 | +9.5 | L −2.5 | 139.5 | U 136 |
| Mar 8 | vs | L 47-61 | +1.5 | L −12.5 | 138.5 | U 108 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
TA&M
L 68-98
−8.5
6
@
UNT
L 53-80
−15.5
11
@
UNA
L 83-87
+2.5
18
@
SF
L 64-84
−3.5
21
@
GCU
L 72-85
+5.5
29
vs
SOU
L 73-75
+1.5
5
@
MCN
L 54-92
−18.5
7
@
SELA
W 76-68
+15.5
13
@
CAL
L 70-79
+10.5
29
vs
LAM
L 61-76
−11.5
31
vs
SFA
L 64-74
−1.5
3
vs
NOLA
W 74-68
+7.5
5
@
NICH
L 72-74
+6.5
10
vs
AMCC
W 79-78
+6.5
12
vs
RGV
W 64-63
+3.5
17
@
UIW
L 74-76
+6.5
19
@
HCU
L 80-82
+0.5
27
@
SFA
L 67-69
+12.5
31
@
NOLA
L 64-75
−6.5
2
vs
NICH
L 58-61
−1.5
4
vs
ETAM
L 68-74
−9.5
7
@
ETAM
L 48-52
−2.5
9
@
LAM
W 70-68
+8.5
14
vs
SELA
W 69-66
+1.5
16
vs
MCN
L 64-75
+3.5
21
vs
HCU
W 71-53
+15.5
23
vs
UIW
W 54-49
+3.5
28
@
AMCC
L 59-71
−6.5
2
@
RGV
L 62-74
−2.5
8
vs
NICH
L 47-61
−12.5
covered 17didn’t cover 13avg +0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
TA&M
L 68-98
+12.5
6
@
UNT
L 53-80
−4.5
11
@
UNA
L 83-87
+27.5
18
@
SF
L 64-84
+4.5
21
@
GCU
L 72-85
+9.5
29
vs
SOU
L 73-75
+3.5
5
@
MCN
L 54-92
+6.5
7
@
SELA
W 76-68
+10.5
13
@
CAL
L 70-79
+3.5
29
vs
LAM
L 61-76
−1.5
31
vs
SFA
L 64-74
−0.5
3
vs
NOLA
W 74-68
−7.5
5
@
NICH
L 72-74
+1.5
10
vs
AMCC
W 79-78
+18.5
12
vs
RGV
W 64-63
−16.5
17
@
UIW
L 74-76
+8.5
19
@
HCU
L 80-82
+22.5
27
@
SFA
L 67-69
−5.5
31
@
NOLA
L 64-75
−14.5
2
vs
NICH
L 58-61
−28.5
4
vs
ETAM
L 68-74
−1.5
7
@
ETAM
L 48-52
−40.5
9
@
LAM
W 70-68
+2.5
14
vs
SELA
W 69-66
+3.5
16
vs
MCN
L 64-75
+0.5
21
vs
HCU
W 71-53
−10.5
23
vs
UIW
W 54-49
−35.5
28
@
AMCC
L 59-71
−4.5
2
@
RGV
L 62-74
−3.5
8
vs
NICH
L 47-61
−30.5
over 15under 15avg −2.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Murray St
33 games played
Straight up
20-13
61% wins
Against the spread
14-19
42% covers · avg −2.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
19-14
58% overs · avg +4.9 pts vs the total
Against the spread
14-1942%
8 straight misses ATS0 of last 4 covered
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 85-77 | -5.5 | W +2.5 | 153.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 108-60 | -38.5 | W +9.5 | 159.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 91-102 | +10.5 | L −0.5 | 164.5 | O 193 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 99-79 | -14.5 | W +5.5 | 157.5 | O 178 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 89-68 | -13.5 | W +7.5 | 153.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 23 | vs | L 87-90 | -6.5 | L −9.5 | 161.5 | O 177 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 60-73 | +2.5 | L −10.5 | 158.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 96-95 | +7.5 | W +8.5 | 167.5 | O 191 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 84-52 | -16.5 | W +15.5 | 158.5 | U 136 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 81-68 | -16.5 | L −3.5 | 157.5 | U 149 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 115-100 | +4.5 | W +19.5 | 168.5 | O 215 |
| Dec 18 | vs | W 81-72 | -7.5 | W +1.5 | 156.5 | U 153 |
| Dec 21 | @ | W 85-79 | -5.5 | W +0.5 | 155.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 84-81 | -6.5 | L −3.5 | 165.5 | U 165 |
| Jan 1 | @ | W 81-77 | -5.5 | L −1.5 | 159.5 | U 158 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 86-66 | -5.5 | W +14.5 | 162.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 79-69 | -8.5 | W +1.5 | 153.5 | U 148 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 92-79 | -12.5 | W +0.5 | 152.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 85-81 | -11.5 | L −7.5 | 167.5 | U 166 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 90-101 | -4.5 | L −15.5 | 156.5 | O 191 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 76-81 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 145.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 28 | vs | L 65-70 | -3.5 | L −8.5 | 159.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 86-103 | +3.5 | L −13.5 | 163.5 | O 189 |
| Feb 3 | vs | W 81-74 | -6.5 | W +0.5 | 157.5 | U 155 |
| Feb 6 | @ | W 91-81 | -1.5 | W +8.5 | 157.5 | O 172 |
| Feb 9 | vs | L 60-89 | -4.5 | L −33.5 | 145.5 | O 149 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 74-72 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 163.5 | U 146 |
| Feb 15 | vs | L 70-87 | +1.5 | L −15.5 | 166.5 | U 157 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 61-78 | +2.5 | L −14.5 | 158.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 88-75 | -15.5 | L −2.5 | 153.5 | O 163 |
| Mar 1 | @ | L 78-87 | +3.5 | L −5.5 | 157.5 | O 165 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 79-92 | +1.5 | L −11.5 | 150.5 | O 171 |
| Mar 18 | @ | L 75-89 | +8.5 | L −5.5 | 159.5 | O 164 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
OMA
W 85-77
+2.5
7
vs
MVSU
W 108-60
+9.5
11
@
SMU
L 91-102
−0.5
15
vs
NICH
W 99-79
+5.5
18
vs
LR
W 89-68
+7.5
23
vs
MTSU
L 87-90
−9.5
24
vs
MCN
L 60-73
−10.5
25
vs
GW
W 96-95
+8.5
2
vs
MORE
W 84-52
+15.5
6
vs
BELL
W 81-68
−3.5
13
vs
AKR
W 115-100
+19.5
18
vs
DRKE
W 81-72
+1.5
21
@
VAL
W 85-79
+0.5
29
vs
SIU
W 84-81
−3.5
1
@
UIC
W 81-77
−1.5
4
vs
BRAD
W 86-66
+14.5
7
@
EVAN
W 79-69
+1.5
10
vs
VAL
W 92-79
+0.5
17
vs
INST
W 85-81
−7.5
21
@
DRKE
L 90-101
−15.5
24
@
UNI
L 76-81
−6.5
28
vs
ILST
L 65-70
−8.5
31
@
BEL
L 86-103
−13.5
3
vs
UIC
W 81-74
+0.5
6
@
SIU
W 91-81
+8.5
9
vs
UNI
L 60-89
−33.5
12
@
INST
W 74-72
−1.5
15
vs
BEL
L 70-87
−15.5
18
@
ILST
L 61-78
−14.5
21
vs
EVAN
W 88-75
−2.5
1
@
BRAD
L 78-87
−5.5
6
vs
UIC
L 79-92
−11.5
18
@
NEV
L 75-89
−5.5
covered 14didn’t cover 19avg −2.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
OMA
W 85-77
+8.5
7
vs
MVSU
W 108-60
+8.5
11
@
SMU
L 91-102
+28.5
15
vs
NICH
W 99-79
+20.5
18
vs
LR
W 89-68
+3.5
23
vs
MTSU
L 87-90
+15.5
24
vs
MCN
L 60-73
−25.5
25
vs
GW
W 96-95
+23.5
2
vs
MORE
W 84-52
−22.5
6
vs
BELL
W 81-68
−8.5
13
vs
AKR
W 115-100
+46.5
18
vs
DRKE
W 81-72
−3.5
21
@
VAL
W 85-79
+8.5
29
vs
SIU
W 84-81
−0.5
1
@
UIC
W 81-77
−1.5
4
vs
BRAD
W 86-66
−10.5
7
@
EVAN
W 79-69
−5.5
10
vs
VAL
W 92-79
+18.5
17
vs
INST
W 85-81
−1.5
21
@
DRKE
L 90-101
+34.5
24
@
UNI
L 76-81
+11.5
28
vs
ILST
L 65-70
−24.5
31
@
BEL
L 86-103
+25.5
3
vs
UIC
W 81-74
−2.5
6
@
SIU
W 91-81
+14.5
9
vs
UNI
L 60-89
+3.5
12
@
INST
W 74-72
−17.5
15
vs
BEL
L 70-87
−9.5
18
@
ILST
L 61-78
−19.5
21
vs
EVAN
W 88-75
+9.5
1
@
BRAD
L 78-87
+7.5
6
vs
UIC
L 79-92
+20.5
18
@
NEV
L 75-89
+4.5
over 19under 14avg +4.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Murray St has the better starters
Position by position: N'Western St 0, Murray St 3, even 2
N'Western StBetterMurray St
G I. Miles10.7 pts · 2.5 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 57
=Even
G C. Jones TR10 pts · 3 reb · 3.1 ast
Score 61
G C. Larry2.6 pts · 1.4 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 1
→MURBig
G R. Domon14.2 pts · 5.2 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 95
F D. Thomas TR5.1 pts · 5.3 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 20
=Even
G M. Courbon4.6 pts · 2 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 31
F A. Osojnik TR5.6 pts · 2.5 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 22
→MURSmall
F S. Tupuola TR6.3 pts · 5.8 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 55
F K. Turner3.8 pts · 2.5 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 34
→MURSmall
F B. Rogers TR6.7 pts · 3.6 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 67
N'Western StBetterMurray St
NWST offense340th of 366 · -11.5
→MURBig
MUR defense197th of 366 · -4.8
NWST defense236th of 366 · -6.2
→MURSmall
MUR offense110th of 366 · -1.8
Backcourt-3.7 · 2 players
→MURBig
Backcourt+2.2 · 3 players
Frontcourt-3.2 · 3 players
→MURBig
Frontcourt+0.4 · 2 players
BenchNo numbers yet
=No call
Bench-1.0 · 2 players
Score, worst to bestNWST betterMUR betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
I. Miles25 minC. Larry18 minK. SimpsonNewD. BrownNewA. AlmuttarNewB. RemoNew
Forwards
D. Thomas18 min · TRA. Osojnik16 min · TRK. Turner13 minN. OjukwuNewC. KellyNewJ. NesbittNew
Guards
C. Jones26 min · TRR. Domon25 minM. Courbon16 minB. Shorter15 minK. Magwood11 min · TRB. ShtolzbergNew
Forwards
S. Tupuola25 min · TRB. Rogers18 min · TRP. NikolicNewJ. BoulefaaNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 66.1 #346 | Points per game | 83.1 #26 |
| 1.01 #315 | Points per possession | 1.15 #56 |
| 65.4 #334 | Pace (possessions) | 72.3 #30 |
| Shooting | ||
| 48.6 #301 | Effective FG% | 53.8 #70 |
| 33.2 #218 | 3-point % | 35.0 #120 |
| 33.9 #298 | 3-point attempt rate | 44.8 #72 |
| 40.1 #58 | Free throw rate | 38.6 #86 |
| Possessions | ||
| 18.3 #286 | Turnover rate | 16.4 #160 |
| 26.1 #321 | Offensive rebound rate | 32.6 #100 |
| 11.3 #322 | Assists per game | 13.7 #165 |
| Defense | ||
| 72.9 #129 | Points allowed | 80.2 #323 |
| 1.12 #262 | Points allowed per possession | 1.11 #233 |
| 53.0 #270 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.4 #236 |
| 35.5 #278 | Opponent 3-point % | 36.2 #310 |
| 16.9 #160 | Turnovers forced | 15.7 #234 |
| 67.4 #286 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.7 #214 |
| 6.2 #215 | Steals per game | 5.9 #248 |
| 2.3 #321 | Blocks per game | 4.1 #69 |
N'Western St
8-22 in 2025-26 overall · 8-15 in conference · Southland Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Nicholls47–61
- L@ UT Rio Grande62–74
- L@ Texas A&M-CC59–71
- Wvs Incarnate Word54–49
- Wvs Hou Christian71–53
A week or more of rest.
Murray St
20-13 in 2025-26 overall · 12-9 in conference · Missouri Valley Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Nevada75–89
- Lvs UIC79–92
- L@ Bradley78–87
- Wvs Evansville88–75
- L@ Illinois St61–78
A week or more of rest.