Provident Credit Union Event Center · at San José St
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | SJSU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects SJSU 82–68 · win probability SJSU 88%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 150.1
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: SJSU has more of the edges
ALST 1, SJSU 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Schedule so far
ALST has played the 333rd-hardest schedule, SJSU the 85th. A record against a soft schedule means less
SJSU offense vs ALST defense
Offense 141st of 366 against a defense 330th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: ALST plays 71.3 a game (59th fastest), SJSU 66.0 (315th). Faster games mean more points
ALST offense vs SJSU defense
Offense 269th of 366 against a defense 151st, on the model’s ratings
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: ALST 31.9%, SJSU 29.3%. Defensive: ALST 68.5%, SJSU 63.5%
Turnovers
Turnover rate: ALST 18.3%, SJSU 15.1%. Forced: ALST 18.7%, SJSU 17.4%
Home court
SJSU at home. This season: SJSU 0-0 at home, ALST 0-0 away
Free throws
Free throw rate: ALST 34.9, SJSU 33.4. Allowed: ALST 42.3, SJSU 35.4
Even
Three-pointers
ALST hits 31.8% and allows 34.2%; SJSU hits 35.3% and allows 36.0%. Threes are 38.5% and 38.3% of their shots
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: ALST 47.1 and allows 52.2; SJSU 49.7 and allows 57.1
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: ALST 32%, SJSU 24%. Transfers in: ALST 3, SJSU 6. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | SJSU -13.7 | — |
| Total | — | 150.1 | — |
| Projected score | — | ALST 68.2 · SJSU 81.9 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | SJSU -8.0 | — |
| 1H total | 70.2 | — |
| 1H projected score | ALST 31.1 · SJSU 39.1 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-7 30% | 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% | |
| 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% | 9-1 90% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
ALST 0–1 SJSUSJSU leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · ALST 1-0 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2022-23 | ALST 57 @ SJSU 70 | SJSU -14.5 | ALST W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Alabama St
31 games played
Straight up
9-22
29% wins
Against the spread
13-18
42% covers · avg −1.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-17
45% overs · avg −1.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | @ | L 64-101 | +24.5 | L −12.5 | 166.5 | U 165 |
| Nov 11 | @ | W 77-74 | +19.5 | W +22.5 | 164.5 | U 151 |
| Nov 17 | @ | L 66-94 | +22.5 | L −5.5 | 156.5 | O 160 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 64-66 | +2.5 | W +0.5 | 138.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 101-80 | +2.5 | W +23.5 | 181.5 | U 181 |
| Nov 23 | vs | L 68-83 | +1.5 | L −13.5 | 142.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 26 | @ | L 87-93 | +19.5 | W +13.5 | 148.5 | O 180 |
| Dec 7 | @ | L 64-74 | +6.5 | L −3.5 | 144.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 11 | @ | L 77-85 | +26.5 | W +18.5 | 155.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 51-88 | +21.5 | L −15.5 | 145.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 67-88 | +20.5 | L −0.5 | 151.5 | O 155 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 56-94 | +17.5 | L −20.5 | 154.5 | U 150 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 89-69 | -13.5 | W +6.5 | 144.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 5 | @ | L 79-90 | -1.5 | L −12.5 | 159.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 64-75 | -7.5 | L −18.5 | 153.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 12 | vs | W 81-66 | -9.5 | W +5.5 | 151.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 19 | vs | L 69-73 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 146.5 | U 142 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 95-80 | -1.5 | W +13.5 | 158.5 | O 175 |
| Jan 27 | @ | L 64-96 | +2.5 | L −29.5 | 155.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 54-69 | +1.5 | L −13.5 | 152.5 | U 123 |
| Feb 2 | vs | W 79-66 | -3.5 | W +9.5 | 139.5 | O 145 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 47-57 | +4.5 | L −5.5 | 144.5 | U 104 |
| Feb 9 | @ | L 68-69 | +6.5 | W +5.5 | 149.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 79-61 | -3.5 | W +14.5 | 149.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 16 | vs | W 92-55 | -16.5 | W +20.5 | 142.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 71-82 | +5.5 | L −5.5 | 147.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 63-76 | -1.5 | L −14.5 | 144.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 89-88 | +1.5 | W +2.5 | 143.5 | O 177 |
| Mar 3 | vs | L 64-71 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 153.5 | U 135 |
| Mar 5 | vs | L 63-65 | -2.5 | L −4.5 | 144.5 | U 128 |
| Mar 9 | vs | L 65-77 | -7.5 | L −19.5 | 141.5 | O 142 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
@
FSU
L 64-101
−12.5
11
@
UAB
W 77-74
+22.5
17
@
COLO
L 66-94
−5.5
19
@
AF
L 64-66
+0.5
21
vs
IUIN
W 101-80
+23.5
23
vs
SIUE
L 68-83
−13.5
26
@
UNM
L 87-93
+13.5
7
@
UTM
L 64-74
−3.5
11
@
MIZ
L 77-85
+18.5
17
@
CIN
L 51-88
−15.5
22
@
MEM
L 67-88
−0.5
29
@
MSST
L 56-94
−20.5
3
@
MVSU
W 89-69
+6.5
5
@
UAPB
L 79-90
−12.5
10
vs
JKST
L 64-75
−18.5
12
vs
ALCN
W 81-66
+5.5
19
vs
AAMU
L 69-73
−5.5
24
@
PV
W 95-80
+13.5
27
@
TXSO
L 64-96
−29.5
31
vs
BCU
L 54-69
−13.5
2
vs
FAMU
W 79-66
+9.5
7
@
GRAM
L 47-57
−5.5
9
@
SOU
L 68-69
+5.5
14
vs
UAPB
W 79-61
+14.5
16
vs
MVSU
W 92-55
+20.5
19
@
BCU
L 71-82
−5.5
21
@
FAMU
L 63-76
−14.5
28
@
AAMU
W 89-88
+2.5
3
vs
SOU
L 64-71
−8.5
5
vs
GRAM
L 63-65
−4.5
9
vs
ALCN
L 65-77
−19.5
covered 13didn’t cover 18avg −1.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
@
FSU
L 64-101
−1.5
11
@
UAB
W 77-74
−13.5
17
@
COLO
L 66-94
+3.5
19
@
AF
L 64-66
−8.5
21
vs
IUIN
W 101-80
−0.5
23
vs
SIUE
L 68-83
+8.5
26
@
UNM
L 87-93
+31.5
7
@
UTM
L 64-74
−6.5
11
@
MIZ
L 77-85
+6.5
17
@
CIN
L 51-88
−6.5
22
@
MEM
L 67-88
+3.5
29
@
MSST
L 56-94
−4.5
3
@
MVSU
W 89-69
+13.5
5
@
UAPB
L 79-90
+9.5
10
vs
JKST
L 64-75
−14.5
12
vs
ALCN
W 81-66
−4.5
19
vs
AAMU
L 69-73
−4.5
24
@
PV
W 95-80
+16.5
27
@
TXSO
L 64-96
+4.5
31
vs
BCU
L 54-69
−29.5
2
vs
FAMU
W 79-66
+5.5
7
@
GRAM
L 47-57
−40.5
9
@
SOU
L 68-69
−12.5
14
vs
UAPB
W 79-61
−9.5
16
vs
MVSU
W 92-55
+4.5
19
@
BCU
L 71-82
+5.5
21
@
FAMU
L 63-76
−5.5
28
@
AAMU
W 89-88
+33.5
3
vs
SOU
L 64-71
−18.5
5
vs
GRAM
L 63-65
−16.5
9
vs
ALCN
L 65-77
+0.5
over 14under 17avg −1.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
San José St
32 games played
Straight up
8-24
25% wins
Against the spread
16-16
50% covers · avg +0.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
21-11
66% overs · avg +5.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 75-84 | +11.5 | W +2.5 | 146.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 74-85 | +9.5 | L −1.5 | 146.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 13 | @ | L 60-79 | +24.5 | W +5.5 | 143.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 80-66 | -5.5 | W +8.5 | 150.5 | U 146 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 51-81 | +5.5 | L −24.5 | 149.5 | U 132 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 63-51 | -1.5 | W +10.5 | 136.5 | U 114 |
| Nov 30 | vs | L 63-72 | +3.5 | L −5.5 | 139.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 5 | vs | W 86-69 | -6.5 | W +10.5 | 144.5 | O 155 |
| Dec 9 | vs | W 89-83 | -7.5 | L −1.5 | 141.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 82-86 | +8.5 | W +4.5 | 145.5 | O 168 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 65-88 | +16.5 | L −6.5 | 152.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 30 | vs | L 68-81 | +11.5 | L −1.5 | 141.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 78-96 | +22.5 | W +4.5 | 151.5 | O 174 |
| Jan 6 | vs | L 55-70 | +1.5 | L −13.5 | 149.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 58-76 | +16.5 | L −1.5 | 141.5 | U 134 |
| Jan 13 | vs | W 70-62 | -5.5 | W +2.5 | 128.5 | O 132 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 62-76 | +7.5 | L −6.5 | 146.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 20 | @ | L 54-87 | +16.5 | L −16.5 | 137.5 | O 141 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 62-66 | +13.5 | W +9.5 | 141.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 27 | vs | L 58-89 | +12.5 | L −18.5 | 141.5 | O 147 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 80-90 | +15.5 | W +5.5 | 148.5 | O 170 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 57-65 | +15.5 | W +7.5 | 138.5 | U 122 |
| Feb 10 | @ | L 75-82 | +12.5 | W +5.5 | 149.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 79-94 | +11.5 | L −3.5 | 139.5 | O 173 |
| Feb 17 | vs | W 87-71 | +10.5 | W +26.5 | 141.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 69-84 | +18.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 24 | @ | W 86-80 | -6.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | O 166 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 73-85 | +4.5 | L −7.5 | 151.5 | O 158 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 68-82 | +7.5 | L −6.5 | 151.5 | U 150 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 78-88 | +6.5 | L −3.5 | 148.5 | O 166 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 84-74 | +14.5 | W +24.5 | 146.5 | O 158 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 77-93 | +16.5 | W +0.5 | 154.5 | O 170 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
UTAH
L 75-84
+2.5
8
@
UCSB
L 74-85
−1.5
13
@
MSU
L 60-79
+5.5
21
vs
SOU
W 80-66
+8.5
25
vs
TLSA
L 51-81
−24.5
26
vs
LUC
W 63-51
+10.5
30
vs
UCI
L 63-72
−5.5
5
vs
USD
W 86-69
+10.5
9
vs
LBSU
W 89-83
−1.5
13
vs
STAN
L 82-86
+4.5
20
@
UNM
L 65-88
−6.5
30
vs
SDSU
L 68-81
−1.5
3
@
USU
L 78-96
+4.5
6
vs
FRES
L 55-70
−13.5
10
@
GCU
L 58-76
−1.5
13
vs
AF
W 70-62
+2.5
17
vs
UNLV
L 62-76
−6.5
20
@
NEV
L 54-87
−16.5
24
@
WYO
L 62-66
+9.5
27
vs
BOIS
L 58-89
−18.5
31
vs
UNM
L 80-90
+5.5
7
@
CSU
L 57-65
+7.5
10
@
UNLV
L 75-82
+5.5
14
vs
GCU
L 79-94
−3.5
17
vs
NEV
W 87-71
+26.5
21
@
BOIS
L 69-84
+3.5
24
@
AF
W 86-80
−0.5
28
vs
CSU
L 73-85
−7.5
3
@
FRES
L 68-82
−6.5
7
vs
WYO
L 78-88
−3.5
11
vs
BOIS
W 84-74
+24.5
12
vs
UNM
L 77-93
+0.5
covered 16didn’t cover 16avg +0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
UTAH
L 75-84
+12.5
8
@
UCSB
L 74-85
+12.5
13
@
MSU
L 60-79
−4.5
21
vs
SOU
W 80-66
−4.5
25
vs
TLSA
L 51-81
−17.5
26
vs
LUC
W 63-51
−22.5
30
vs
UCI
L 63-72
−4.5
5
vs
USD
W 86-69
+10.5
9
vs
LBSU
W 89-83
+30.5
13
vs
STAN
L 82-86
+22.5
20
@
UNM
L 65-88
+0.5
30
vs
SDSU
L 68-81
+7.5
3
@
USU
L 78-96
+22.5
6
vs
FRES
L 55-70
−24.5
10
@
GCU
L 58-76
−7.5
13
vs
AF
W 70-62
+3.5
17
vs
UNLV
L 62-76
−8.5
20
@
NEV
L 54-87
+3.5
24
@
WYO
L 62-66
−13.5
27
vs
BOIS
L 58-89
+5.5
31
vs
UNM
L 80-90
+21.5
7
@
CSU
L 57-65
−16.5
10
@
UNLV
L 75-82
+7.5
14
vs
GCU
L 79-94
+33.5
17
vs
NEV
W 87-71
+16.5
21
@
BOIS
L 69-84
+6.5
24
@
AF
W 86-80
+20.5
28
vs
CSU
L 73-85
+6.5
3
@
FRES
L 68-82
−1.5
7
vs
WYO
L 78-88
+17.5
11
vs
BOIS
W 84-74
+11.5
12
vs
UNM
L 77-93
+15.5
over 21under 11avg +5.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: Alabama St 1, San José St 1, even 3
Alabama StBetterSan José St
G M. James TR21 pts · 3.3 reb · 2.7 ast
Score 77
←ALSTBig
G P. Goodarzi8.2 pts · 1.9 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 35
G A. Brown13.8 pts · 2.8 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 46
=No call
G J. Hannah7.5 pts · 1 reb · 0.5 ast
Not ranked
G T. Miller7 pts · 1 reb · 3 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F Z. Eddine Bedri TR12.8 pts · 7.4 reb · 2.2 ast
Not ranked
F J. Walker4.6 pts · 3.3 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 19
=No call
F R. Vaihola TR5 pts · 7.6 reb · 1.4 ast
Not ranked
F J. Scott TR3.7 pts · 3 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 33
→SJSUSmall
F M. Cook TR7.5 pts · 4 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 61
Alabama StBetterSan José St
ALST offense269th of 366 · -8.2
→SJSUSmall
SJSU defense151st of 366 · -3.3
ALST defense330th of 366 · -8.6
→SJSUBig
SJSU offense141st of 366 · -4.3
Backcourt-1.0 · 3 players
=Even
Backcourt-1.8 · 2 players
Frontcourt-1.8 · 2 players
→SJSUBig
Frontcourt+2.3 · 3 players
Bench-0.0 · 1 player
→SJSUSmall
Bench+1.4 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestALST betterSJSU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
M. James37 min · TRA. Brown26 minT. Miller22 minD. BondsNewP. McMillanNewJ. RogersNew
Forwards
J. Walker16 minJ. Scott12 min · TRI. Barganier1 min · TRP. MensahNewM. DixonNewT. HamptonNew
Guards
P. Goodarzi26 minJ. Hannah22 minM. Mason20 min · TRJ. Chammaa17 min · TRR. GreenNewC. KruegerNew
Forwards
Z. Eddine Bedri24 min · TRR. Vaihola21 min · TRM. Cook21 min · TRK. Martin8 min · TRL. HowardNew
Centers
M. Dau NyangolNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 71.5 #260 | Points per game | 70.8 #269 |
| 1.01 #318 | Points per possession | 1.07 #203 |
| 71.3 #59 | Pace (possessions) | 66.0 #315 |
| Shooting | ||
| 47.1 #335 | Effective FG% | 49.7 #255 |
| 31.8 #288 | 3-point % | 35.3 #97 |
| 38.5 #200 | 3-point attempt rate | 38.3 #204 |
| 34.9 #185 | Free throw rate | 33.4 #225 |
| Possessions | ||
| 18.3 #289 | Turnover rate | 15.1 #77 |
| 31.9 #128 | Offensive rebound rate | 29.3 #225 |
| 11.7 #303 | Assists per game | 10.3 #353 |
| Defense | ||
| 77.6 #256 | Points allowed | 79.2 #305 |
| 1.09 #185 | Points allowed per possession | 1.20 #359 |
| 52.2 #222 | Opponent effective FG% | 57.1 #359 |
| 34.2 #194 | Opponent 3-point % | 36.0 #305 |
| 18.7 #63 | Turnovers forced | 17.4 #123 |
| 68.5 #230 | Defensive rebound rate | 63.5 #354 |
| 7.9 #50 | Steals per game | 5.8 #259 |
| 3.8 #102 | Blocks per game | 2.2 #333 |
Alabama St
9-22 in 2025-26 overall · 7-12 in conference · Southwestern Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Alcorn St65–77
- Lvs Grambling63–65
- Lvs Southern64–71
- W@ Alabama A&M89–88
- L@ Florida A&M63–76
A week or more of rest.
San José St
8-24 in 2025-26 overall · 4-18 in conference · Mountain West Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs New Mexico77–93
- Wvs Boise St84–74
- Lvs Wyoming78–88
- L@ Fresno St68–82
- Lvs Colorado St73–85
A week or more of rest.