Murray State Racers vs Tennessee State Tigers: Model Line and Edge

Mon, Nov 2, 11:30 AM ETSanford Pentagon · Neutral site

LineMUR -10.5moved 2 toward MUR

Total165.5up 4 from 161.5

Season records: Murray St and Tennessee St
MUR	This season	TNST
0-0	Record	0-0
0-0	ATS	0-0
0-0	O/U	0-0

ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders

Model: projects MUR 82–75 · win probability MUR 74%

Pick this game

Your picksMy picks ›

Spread

Total

Winner

Line

MUR -10.5

moved 2 toward MUR

Total

165.5

model 157.3 · Under by 8

Model edge

TNST by 3.5

model vs market

Public on the spread

75% TNST

72% of the money

The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record

What could decide it: MUR has more of the edges

MUR 3, TNST 1 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games

Context

Schedule so far

MUR has played the 165th-hardest schedule, TNST the 345th. A record against a soft schedule means less

MURBig

MUR offense vs TNST defense

Offense 110th of 366 against a defense 290th, on the model’s ratings

MURBig

Free throws

Free throw rate: MUR 38.6, TNST 33.4. Allowed: MUR 32.2, TNST 41.4

TNSTSmall

Turnovers

Turnover rate: MUR 16.4%, TNST 16.7%. Forced: MUR 15.7%, TNST 19.8%

MURSmall

Shooting

Effective FG%: MUR 53.8 and allows 52.4; TNST 50.0 and allows 51.6

Even

Rebounding

Offensive rebound rate: MUR 32.6%, TNST 34.8%. Defensive: MUR 68.7%, TNST 69.4%

Even

Who is back

Minutes back from last season: MUR 28%, TNST 10%. Transfers in: MUR 4, TNST 7. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price

Even

Three-pointers

MUR hits 35.0% and allows 36.2%; TNST hits 33.3% and allows 34.0%. Threes are 44.8% and 30.7% of their shots

Context

Tempo

About 72 possessions: MUR plays 72.3 a game (30th fastest), TNST 71.1 (66th). Faster games mean more points

Even

TNST offense vs MUR defense

Offense 207th of 366 against a defense 197th, on the model’s ratings

Context

Neutral floor

No home court: the model takes it out of the line

Sorted by how lopsided each matchup is, from national ranks. Reasons to look, not picks: the market already knows most of this.

How games like this went

Division I games since 2023-24, closing lines

Situation	Games	Favorite won	Favorite covered	Went over
Neutral-site favorites of 10 to 14.5	237	84%	53%	43%
Non-conference games at this spread	988	88%	50%	51%
Lines that moved 1+ toward the favorite	6763	75%	50%	51%
Games with a total of 165 to 169.5	312	74%	46%	46%

A bet at standard prices needs 52.4% to break even, and most situations sit near 50%. Past rates, not a prediction.

Market

Open → current

Spread

OpenMUR -8.5

2 → MUR

NowMUR -10.5

2 pts toward MUR

Total

Open161.5

▲ 4

Now165.5

Up 4 since the open

Moneyline

MUR -600 · TNST +425

Line movement

Median of 8 sportsbooks, pre-tip-off · tap a dot

Opened MUR -8.5 · now MUR -10.5 · moved 2 toward MURmodel MUR -7

model MUR -7

Openline modelNow

Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.

Public betting

Share of bets and of money

MUR -10.5Spread

TNST +10.5

Bets

25%75%

Money

28%72%

Over 165.5TotalUnder 165.5

Bets

27%73%

Money

33%67%

MURWinner

TNST

Bets

94%

Money

82%19%

Money is 13 pts ahead of bets on TNST

Sports Betting Dime, an average of sportsbooks. Read Mon, Nov 2, 4:41 AM ET. ⓘ

Books

8 sportsbooks · current prices

SpreadTotalMoneyline

Book	Spread		Total		Moneyline
Book	MUR	TNST	Over	Under	MUR	TNST
BetMGMMGM	+10.5-110	-10.5-110	165.5-105	165.5-115	-600	+425
BetOnline.agBetOnline.ag	+10.5-110	-10.5-110	165-110	165-110	—	—
BetRiversBetRivers	+10.5-106	-10.5-118	166.5-113	166.5-110	-530	+375
BetUSBetUS	+10.5-110	-10.5-110	165-110	165-110	-600	+450
BovadaBovada	+10.5-110	-10.5-110	165-110	165-110	—	—
DraftKingsDK	+10.5-108	-10.5-112	165.5-108	165.5-112	-575	+425
FanDuelFD	+10.5-110	-10.5-110	165.5-108	165.5-112	-610	+440
LowVig.agLowVig.ag	+10.5-106	-10.5-106	165-108	165-108	—	—

Prices from The Odds API, updated 5:30 AM ET. Green = best price in the column.

Model vs market

	Market	Model	Model edge
Spread	MUR -10.5	MUR -7.2	TNST +3.3
Total	165.5	157.3	Under 8.2
Projected score	—	MUR 82.3 · TNST 75

1st-half model

1st-half slate ›

	Model	Actual
1H spread	MUR -4.4	—
1H total	73.5	—
1H projected score	MUR 39 · TNST 34.5	—

The 1st-half model is fitted from the full-game model and past halves. ESPN has no 1st-half lines for college games, so there is no market to compare it with.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

ATS

2025-26 season

	Season	Cover	Neutral	Role
MUR LLLLL	14-19	42%	3-3	12-11
TNST WWWWL	18-12	60%	2-1	8-4

Venue/role: MUR neutral site, as favorite; TNST neutral site, as underdog. Squares: last 5 games ATS (W covered, L didn’t), oldest first.

Totals

2025-26 season

	O-U	Over %	SU
MUR UOOOO	19-14	58%	20-13
TNST UUUOO	14-16	47%	20-10

Squares: last 5 games (O over, U under), oldest first. Tap for the score and line.

Last 10 games

2025-26

	Straight up	Spread	Over / under
MUR	4-6 40%	2-8 20%	6-4 60%
TNST	8-2 80%	7-3 70%	4-6 40%

Wins-losses (pushes last). Spread and over / under skip games without a line.

Next 3 games

With how the last meeting with each opponent went

Murray St

Date	Game	Last meeting
Nov 7	vs NWST	No recent meeting
Nov 10	vs ALCN	No recent meeting
Nov 13	vs TXSO	No recent meeting

Tennessee St

Date	Game	Last meeting
Nov 13	@ TENN	L60–89WU
Nov 17	@ USF	No recent meeting
Nov 29	@ OKST	No recent meeting

Last meeting: result, against the spread, over / under. Hover a result for its date.

Recent meetings

Since 2021-22

MUR 2–0 TNSTMUR leads · 2 games since 2021-22 · MUR has won the last 2 meetings · MUR 1-1 ATS

Date	Result	Line	Covered
Feb 10, 2021-22	MUR 73 @ TNST 62	TNST +14.5	TNST W
Jan 13, 2021-22	TNST 44 @ MUR 67	MUR -20	MUR W

ATS History · 2025-26

WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total

Murray St

33 games played

Straight up

20-13

61% wins

Against the spread

14-19

42% covers · avg −2.3 pts vs the line

Over / Under

19-14

58% overs · avg +4.9 pts vs the total

Straight up

20-1361%

W W L W W L L W W W W W W W W W W W W L L L L W W L W L L W L L L

3 straight losses1 of last 4 won

Against the spread

14-1942%

W W L W W L L W W L W W W L L W W W L L L L L W W L L L L L L L L

8 straight misses ATS0 of last 4 covered

Over / Under

19-1458%

O O O O O O U O U U O U O U U U U O U O O U O U O O U U U O O O O

4 straight overs4 of last 4 over

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 3	vsOMA	W 85-77	-5.5	W +2.5	153.5	O 162
Nov 7	vsMVSU	W 108-60	-38.5	W +9.5	159.5	O 168
Nov 11	@SMU	L 91-102	+10.5	L −0.5	164.5	O 193
Nov 15	vsNICH	W 99-79	-14.5	W +5.5	157.5	O 178
Nov 18	vsLR	W 89-68	-13.5	W +7.5	153.5	O 157
Nov 23	vsMTSU	L 87-90	-6.5	L −9.5	161.5	O 177
Nov 24	vsMCN	L 60-73	+2.5	L −10.5	158.5	U 133
Nov 25	vsGW	W 96-95	+7.5	W +8.5	167.5	O 191
Dec 2	vsMORE	W 84-52	-16.5	W +15.5	158.5	U 136
Dec 6	vsBELL	W 81-68	-16.5	L −3.5	157.5	U 149
Dec 13	vsAKR	W 115-100	+4.5	W +19.5	168.5	O 215
Dec 18	vsDRKE	W 81-72	-7.5	W +1.5	156.5	U 153
Dec 21	@VAL	W 85-79	-5.5	W +0.5	155.5	O 164
Dec 29	vsSIU	W 84-81	-6.5	L −3.5	165.5	U 165
Jan 1	@UIC	W 81-77	-5.5	L −1.5	159.5	U 158
Jan 4	vsBRAD	W 86-66	-5.5	W +14.5	162.5	U 152
Jan 7	@EVAN	W 79-69	-8.5	W +1.5	153.5	U 148
Jan 10	vsVAL	W 92-79	-12.5	W +0.5	152.5	O 171
Jan 17	vsINST	W 85-81	-11.5	L −7.5	167.5	U 166
Jan 21	@DRKE	L 90-101	-4.5	L −15.5	156.5	O 191
Jan 24	@UNI	L 76-81	-1.5	L −6.5	145.5	O 157
Jan 28	vsILST	L 65-70	-3.5	L −8.5	159.5	U 135
Jan 31	@BEL	L 86-103	+3.5	L −13.5	163.5	O 189
Feb 3	vsUIC	W 81-74	-6.5	W +0.5	157.5	U 155
Feb 6	@SIU	W 91-81	-1.5	W +8.5	157.5	O 172
Feb 9	vsUNI	L 60-89	-4.5	L −33.5	145.5	O 149
Feb 12	@INST	W 74-72	-3.5	L −1.5	163.5	U 146
Feb 15	vsBEL	L 70-87	+1.5	L −15.5	166.5	U 157
Feb 18	@ILST	L 61-78	+2.5	L −14.5	158.5	U 139
Feb 21	vsEVAN	W 88-75	-15.5	L −2.5	153.5	O 163
Mar 1	@BRAD	L 78-87	+3.5	L −5.5	157.5	O 165
Mar 6	vsUIC	L 79-92	+1.5	L −11.5	150.5	O 171
Mar 18	@NEV	L 75-89	+8.5	L −5.5	159.5	O 164

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

OMA

W 85-77

+2.5

MVSU

W 108-60

+9.5

SMU

L 91-102

−0.5

NICH

W 99-79

+5.5

W 89-68

+7.5

MTSU

L 87-90

−9.5

MCN

L 60-73

−10.5

W 96-95

+8.5

W 84-52

+15.5

BELL

W 81-68

−3.5

AKR

W 115-100

+19.5

DRKE

W 81-72

+1.5

VAL

W 85-79

+0.5

SIU

W 84-81

−3.5

UIC

W 81-77

−1.5

BRAD

W 86-66

+14.5

EVAN

W 79-69

+1.5

VAL

W 92-79

+0.5

INST

W 85-81

−7.5

DRKE

L 90-101

−15.5

UNI

L 76-81

−6.5

ILST

L 65-70

−8.5

BEL

L 86-103

−13.5

UIC

W 81-74

+0.5

SIU

W 91-81

+8.5

UNI

L 60-89

−33.5

INST

W 74-72

−1.5

BEL

L 70-87

−15.5

ILST

L 61-78

−14.5

EVAN

W 88-75

−2.5

BRAD

L 78-87

−5.5

UIC

L 79-92

−11.5

NEV

L 75-89

−5.5

covered 14didn’t cover 19avg −2.3 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

OMA

W 85-77

+8.5

MVSU

W 108-60

+8.5

SMU

L 91-102

+28.5

NICH

W 99-79

+20.5

W 89-68

+3.5

MTSU

L 87-90

+15.5

MCN

L 60-73

−25.5

W 96-95

+23.5

W 84-52

−22.5

BELL

W 81-68

−8.5

AKR

W 115-100

+46.5

DRKE

W 81-72

−3.5

VAL

W 85-79

+8.5

SIU

W 84-81

−0.5

UIC

W 81-77

−1.5

BRAD

W 86-66

−10.5

EVAN

W 79-69

−5.5

VAL

W 92-79

+18.5

INST

W 85-81

−1.5

DRKE

L 90-101

+34.5

UNI

L 76-81

+11.5

ILST

L 65-70

−24.5

BEL

L 86-103

+25.5

UIC

W 81-74

−2.5

SIU

W 91-81

+14.5

UNI

L 60-89

+3.5

INST

W 74-72

−17.5

BEL

L 70-87

−9.5

ILST

L 61-78

−19.5

EVAN

W 88-75

+9.5

BRAD

L 78-87

+7.5

UIC

L 79-92

+20.5

NEV

L 75-89

+4.5

over 19under 14avg +4.9 ptslonger = bigger margin

Tennessee St

30 games played

Straight up

20-10

67% wins

Against the spread

18-12

60% covers · avg +3.8 pts vs the line

Over / Under

14-16

47% overs · avg +2.3 pts vs the total

Straight up

20-1067%

L L L W W L W W L W W W L W W L W W L W W W L W W W W W W L

3 of last 4 wonno streak

Against the spread

18-1260%

W L W W W L W W L W W W L L L L W W L L W L L W W W W W W L

3 of last 4 coveredno streak

Over / Under

14-1647%

O O U U U U U O O O O O U O U U O U O U U U O O U U U U O O

2 straight overs2 of last 4 over

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 8	@BEL	L 79-87	+13.5	W +5.5	158.5	O 166
Nov 16	@WKU	L 82-95	+12.5	L −0.5	167.5	O 177
Nov 20	@TENN	L 60-89	+31.5	W +2.5	157.5	U 149
Nov 25	@UNCA	W 75-73	+5.5	W +7.5	164.5	U 148
Nov 30	@UTC	W 70-64	+8.5	W +14.5	155.5	U 134
Dec 3	@AAMU	L 53-80	-4.5	L −31.5	147.5	U 133
Dec 13	@UNLV	W 63-60	+12.5	W +15.5	161.5	U 123
Dec 18	vsUTM	W 78-71	-2.5	W +4.5	141.5	O 149
Dec 20	vsSEMO	L 82-91	+1.5	L −7.5	151.5	O 173
Dec 30	@TNTC	W 88-76	-1.5	W +10.5	155.5	O 164
Jan 3	@LR	W 84-79	-1.5	W +3.5	144.5	O 163
Jan 8	@WIU	W 90-68	-6.5	W +15.5	145.5	O 158
Jan 10	@EIU	L 70-74	-3.5	L −7.5	144.5	U 144
Jan 15	vsMORE	W 105-100	-7.5	L −2.5	148.5	O 205
Jan 17	vsUSI	W 73-67	-8.5	L −2.5	150.5	U 140
Jan 22	@SIUE	L 66-74	+1.5	L −6.5	142.5	U 140
Jan 24	@LIN	W 96-86	+4.5	W +14.5	160.5	O 182
Jan 29	vsLR	W 70-63	-4.5	W +2.5	150.5	U 133
Feb 2	vsTNTC	L 85-90	-7.5	L −12.5	153.5	O 175
Feb 5	vsEIU	W 77-68	-9.5	L −0.5	145.5	U 145
Feb 7	vsWIU	W 83-56	-15.5	W +11.5	151.5	U 139
Feb 12	@USI	W 73-71	-6.5	L −4.5	147.5	U 144
Feb 14	@MORE	L 86-94	-1.5	L −9.5	148.5	O 180
Feb 19	vsLIN	W 89-80	-3.5	W +5.5	159.5	O 169
Feb 21	vsSIUE	W 80-53	-2.5	W +24.5	143.5	U 133
Feb 26	@SEMO	W 79-71	+2.5	W +10.5	151.5	U 150
Feb 28	@UTM	W 67-42	+2.5	W +27.5	143.5	U 109
Mar 6	vsUTM	W 68-55	-1.5	W +11.5	137.5	U 123
Mar 7	vsMORE	W 93-67	-5.5	W +20.5	143.5	O 160
Mar 20	vsISU	L 74-108	+24.5	L −9.5	147.5	O 182

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

BEL

L 79-87

+5.5

WKU

L 82-95

−0.5

TENN

L 60-89

+2.5

UNCA

W 75-73

+7.5

UTC

W 70-64

+14.5

AAMU

L 53-80

−31.5

UNLV

W 63-60

+15.5

UTM

W 78-71

+4.5

SEMO

L 82-91

−7.5

TNTC

W 88-76

+10.5

W 84-79

+3.5

WIU

W 90-68

+15.5

EIU

L 70-74

−7.5

W 105-100

−2.5

USI

W 73-67

−2.5

SIUE

L 66-74

−6.5

LIN

W 96-86

+14.5

W 70-63

+2.5

TNTC

L 85-90

−12.5

EIU

W 77-68

−0.5

WIU

W 83-56

+11.5

USI

W 73-71

−4.5

L 86-94

−9.5

LIN

W 89-80

+5.5

SIUE

W 80-53

+24.5

SEMO

W 79-71

+10.5

UTM

W 67-42

+27.5

UTM

W 68-55

+11.5

W 93-67

+20.5

ISU

L 74-108

−9.5

covered 18didn’t cover 12avg +3.8 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

BEL

L 79-87

+7.5

WKU

L 82-95

+9.5

TENN

L 60-89

−8.5

UNCA

W 75-73

−16.5

UTC

W 70-64

−21.5

AAMU

L 53-80

−14.5

UNLV

W 63-60

−38.5

UTM

W 78-71

+7.5

SEMO

L 82-91

+21.5

TNTC

W 88-76

+8.5

W 84-79

+18.5

WIU

W 90-68

+12.5

EIU

L 70-74

−0.5

W 105-100

+56.5

USI

W 73-67

−10.5

SIUE

L 66-74

−2.5

LIN

W 96-86

+21.5

W 70-63

−17.5

TNTC

L 85-90

+21.5

EIU

W 77-68

−0.5

WIU

W 83-56

−12.5

USI

W 73-71

−3.5

L 86-94

+31.5

LIN

W 89-80

+9.5

SIUE

W 80-53

−10.5

SEMO

W 79-71

−1.5

UTM

W 67-42

−34.5

UTM

W 68-55

−14.5

W 93-67

+16.5

ISU

L 74-108

+34.5

over 14under 16avg +2.3 ptslonger = bigger margin

Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.

The starting fives are even

Position by position: Murray St 2, Tennessee St 2, even 1

Murray StBetterTennessee St

G C. Jones TR10 pts · 3 reb · 3.1 ast Score 61

TNSTSmall

G T. Johnson TR15 pts · 2.8 reb · 4.2 ast Score 85

G R. Domon14.2 pts · 5.2 reb · 1.6 ast Score 95

MURBig

G A. Morris TR11.1 pts · 3.7 reb · 2.7 ast Score 30

G M. Courbon4.6 pts · 2 reb · 1.2 ast Score 31

Even

G C. Alston TR4.5 pts · 1.9 reb · 0.3 ast Score 42

F S. Tupuola TR6.3 pts · 5.8 reb · 0.8 ast Score 55

TNSTSmall

F A. Bradshaw TR8.6 pts · 4.2 reb · 0.6 ast Score 79

F B. Rogers TR6.7 pts · 3.6 reb · 1.7 ast Score 67

MURSmall

F J. Rivera TR3.3 pts · 2 reb · 0.5 ast Score 47

Murray StBetterTennessee St

MUR offense110th of 366 · -1.8

MURBig

TNST defense290th of 366 · -7.3

MUR defense197th of 366 · -4.8

Even

TNST offense207th of 366 · -6.3

Backcourt+2.2 · 3 players

MURSmall

Backcourt-0.4 · 3 players

Frontcourt+0.4 · 2 players

Even

Frontcourt+1.0 · 2 players

Bench-1.0 · 2 players

MURSmall

Bench-2.4 · 5 players

Score, worst to bestMUR betterTNST betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers

Projected starters: college teams publish no depth chart, so these come from minutes played, and a freshman or a new starter can change them. The score is the share of ranked players at the position that player is ahead of. Numbers are this season's once a player has 30 minutes, 2025-26's before that. Bench is the next five by minutes. Tap a player for the full numbers.

Depth chart

Projected rotation by position, starters outlined

Murray St

Guards

C. Jones26 min · TRR. Domon25 minM. Courbon16 minB. Shorter15 minK. Magwood11 min · TRB. ShtolzbergNew

Forwards

S. Tupuola25 min · TRB. Rogers18 min · TRP. NikolicNewJ. BoulefaaNew

Tennessee St

Guards

T. Johnson29 min · TRA. Morris28 min · TRC. Alston11 min · TRD. Howard8 minI. Stewart4 min · TRJ. Jones3 min

Forwards

A. Bradshaw19 min · TRJ. Rivera12 min · TRK. Jones11 minD. LindseyNew

In order of minutes, from rosters as of today. ESPN lists players only as guards, forwards or centers, and no injury report exists for college basketball, so a player who is out may still show here.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

Matchup stats

2025-26 · rank among 365 teams

ChartTable

Scoring

Points per game

MUR83.1 #26

TNST77.9 #96

Points per possession

MUR1.15 #56

TNST1.10 #146

Pace (possessions)

MUR72.3 #30

TNST71.1 #66

Shooting

Effective FG%

MUR53.8 #70

TNST50.0 #237

3-point %

MUR35.0 #120

TNST33.3 #211

3-point attempt rate

MUR44.8 #72

TNST30.7 #344

Free throw rate

MUR38.6 #86

TNST33.4 #228

Possessions

Turnover rate

MUR16.4 #160

TNST16.7 #177

Offensive rebound rate

MUR32.6 #100

TNST34.8 #53

Assists per game

MUR13.7 #165

TNST12.7 #237

Defense

Points allowed

MUR80.2 #323

TNST75.1 #191

Points allowed per possession

MUR1.11 #233

TNST1.06 #97

Opponent effective FG%

MUR52.4 #236

TNST51.6 #190

Opponent 3-point %

MUR36.2 #310

TNST34.0 #183

Turnovers forced

MUR15.7 #234

TNST19.8 #26

Defensive rebound rate

MUR68.7 #214

TNST69.4 #184

Steals per game

MUR5.9 #248

TNST9.0 #10

Blocks per game

MUR4.1 #69

TNST3.8 #99

MUR		TNST
Scoring
83.1 #26	Points per game	77.9 #96
1.15 #56	Points per possession	1.10 #146
72.3 #30	Pace (possessions)	71.1 #66
Shooting
53.8 #70	Effective FG%	50.0 #237
35.0 #120	3-point %	33.3 #211
44.8 #72	3-point attempt rate	30.7 #344
38.6 #86	Free throw rate	33.4 #228
Possessions
16.4 #160	Turnover rate	16.7 #177
32.6 #100	Offensive rebound rate	34.8 #53
13.7 #165	Assists per game	12.7 #237
Defense
80.2 #323	Points allowed	75.1 #191
1.11 #233	Points allowed per possession	1.06 #97
52.4 #236	Opponent effective FG%	51.6 #190
36.2 #310	Opponent 3-point %	34.0 #183
15.7 #234	Turnovers forced	19.8 #26
68.7 #214	Defensive rebound rate	69.4 #184
5.9 #248	Steals per game	9.0 #10
4.1 #69	Blocks per game	3.8 #99

From the box scores. A longer bar is a better national rank, on every row; the better team's bar is solid. A green rank is near the top of Division I, a red one near the bottom. Pace and 3-point rate are styles, so they have no better side.

Murray St

20-13 in 2025-26 overall · 12-9 in conference · Missouri Valley Conference

Last five, 2025-26

L@ Nevada75–89
Lvs UIC79–92
L@ Bradley78–87
Wvs Evansville88–75
L@ Illinois St61–78

A week or more of rest.

Tennessee St

20-10 in 2025-26 overall · 17-5 in conference · Ohio Valley Conference

Last five, 2025-26

Lvs Iowa State74–108
Wvs Morehead St93–67
Wvs UT Martin68–55
W@ UT Martin67–42
W@ SE Missouri79–71

A week or more of rest.