UAB Blazers vs McNeese Cowboys: Model Line and Edge

Mon, Nov 2, 5:30 PM ETRock Hill Sports & Event Center · Neutral site

#102UABUAB

LineMCN -2.5moved 1 toward UAB

Total151.5up 3 from 148.5

Season records: UAB and McNeese
UAB	This season	MCN
0-0	Record	0-0
0-0	ATS	0-0
0-0	O/U	0-0

ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders

Model: projects UAB 75–75 · win probability UAB 53%

Pick this game

Your picksMy picks ›

Spread

Total

Winner

Line

MCN -2.5

moved 1 toward UAB

Total

151.5

model 149.9 · Under by 1.5

Model edge

UAB by 3.5

model vs market

Public

—

No split yet for this game

The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record

What could decide it

UAB 2, MCN 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games

UABBig

Free throws

Free throw rate: UAB 36.4, MCN 37.4. Allowed: UAB 28.6, MCN 42.0

Context

Schedule so far

UAB has played the 129th-hardest schedule, MCN the 258th. A record against a soft schedule means less

UABBig

Rebounding

Offensive rebound rate: UAB 32.5%, MCN 35.1%. Defensive: UAB 72.3%, MCN 65.1%

Context

Tempo

About 69 possessions: UAB plays 71.2 a game (61st fastest), MCN 67.1 (276th). Faster games mean more points

MCNSmall

Turnovers

Turnover rate: UAB 12.6%, MCN 14.2%. Forced: UAB 16.1%, MCN 24.4%

MCNSmall

Shooting

Effective FG%: UAB 48.4 and allows 50.0; MCN 50.7 and allows 49.3

Even

Who is back

Minutes back from last season: UAB 10%, MCN 33%. Transfers in: UAB 6, MCN 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price

Even

UAB offense vs MCN defense

Offense 82nd of 366 against a defense 117th, on the model’s ratings

Even

Three-pointers

UAB hits 27.8% and allows 32.6%; MCN hits 31.7% and allows 32.7%. Threes are 30.5% and 35.2% of their shots

Even

MCN offense vs UAB defense

Offense 153rd of 366 against a defense 141st, on the model’s ratings

Context

Neutral floor

No home court: the model takes it out of the line

Sorted by how lopsided each matchup is, from national ranks. Reasons to look, not picks: the market already knows most of this.

How games like this went

Division I games since 2023-24, closing lines

Situation	Games	Favorite won	Favorite covered	Went over
Neutral-site favorites of under 3	576	53%	48%	48%
Non-conference games at this spread	1094	54%	49%	50%
Lines that moved 1+ toward the underdog	4513	74%	51%	50%
Games with a total of 150 to 154.5	2755	75%	51%	50%

A bet at standard prices needs 52.4% to break even, and most situations sit near 50%. Past rates, not a prediction.

Market

Open → current

Spread

OpenMCN -3.5

1 → UAB

NowMCN -2.5

1 pt toward UAB

Total

Open148.5

▲ 3

Now151.5

Up 3 since the open

Moneyline

UAB +146 · MCN -178

Line movement

Median of 7 sportsbooks, pre-tip-off · tap a dot

Opened MCN -3.5 · now MCN -4 · moved 0.5 toward MCNmodel UAB -1

model UAB -1

Openline modelNow

Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.

Public betting

Share of bets and of money

UABWinner

MCN

Bets

15%85%

Money

12%88%

Sports Betting Dime, an average of sportsbooks. Read Mon, Nov 2, 4:41 AM ET. ⓘ

Books

7 sportsbooks · current prices

SpreadTotalMoneyline

Book	Spread		Total		Moneyline
Book	UAB	MCN	Over	Under	UAB	MCN
BetMGMMGM	-3.5-105	+3.5-115	151.5-105	151.5-115	+150	-185
BetOnline.agBetOnline.ag	-4-110	+4-110	150.5-115	150.5-105	—	—
BetRiversBetRivers	-3.5-115	+3.5-108	150.5-114	150.5-109	+140	-177
BovadaBovada	-4-110	+4-110	150.5-115	150.5-105	+145	-170
DraftKingsDK	-3.5-110	+3.5-110	151.5-105	151.5-115	+150	-180
FanDuelFD	-4.5-120	+4.5-102	151.5-110	151.5-110	+146	-178
LowVig.agLowVig.ag	-4-106	+4-106	150.5-113	150.5-103	—	—

Prices from The Odds API, updated 5:30 AM ET. Green = best price in the column.

Model vs market

	Market	Model	Model edge
Spread	MCN -2.5	UAB -0.9	UAB +3.5
Total	151.5	149.9	Under 1.6
Projected score	—	UAB 75.4 · MCN 74.5

1st-half model

1st-half slate ›

	Model	Actual
1H spread	UAB -0.7	—
1H total	70.1	—
1H projected score	UAB 35.4 · MCN 34.7	—

The 1st-half model is fitted from the full-game model and past halves. ESPN has no 1st-half lines for college games, so there is no market to compare it with.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

ATS

2025-26 season

	Season	Cover	Neutral	Role
UAB WLWLL	15-16	48%	2-1	7-2
MCN LWLWW	16-16	50%	5-1	14-14

Venue/role: UAB neutral site, as underdog; MCN neutral site, as favorite. Squares: last 5 games ATS (W covered, L didn’t), oldest first.

Totals

2025-26 season

	O-U	Over %	SU
UAB UUOOO	14-17	45%	19-12
MCN UUOOU	15-17	47%	26-6

Squares: last 5 games (O over, U under), oldest first. Tap for the score and line.

Last 10 games

2025-26

	Straight up	Spread	Over / under
UAB	6-4 60%	4-6 40%	5-5 50%
MCN	9-1 90%	5-5 50%	5-5 50%

Wins-losses (pushes last). Spread and over / under skip games without a line.

Next 3 games

With how the last meeting with each opponent went

UAB

Date	Game	Last meeting
Nov 6	vs NICH	No recent meeting
Nov 9	vs FAMU	No recent meeting
Nov 14	@ JXST	No recent meeting

McNeese

Date	Game	Last meeting
Nov 5	@ UNT	W68–61WO
Nov 22	@ TXST	W59–48WU
Nov 28	@ UL	W88–62WO

Last meeting: result, against the spread, over / under. Hover a result for its date.

Recent meetings

Since 2021-22

UAB 0–1 MCNMCN leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · UAB 0-1 ATS

Date	Result	Line	Covered
Nov 28, 2023-24	MCN 81 @ UAB 60	UAB -5.5	MCN W

ATS History · 2025-26

WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total

UAB

31 games played

Straight up

19-12

61% wins

Against the spread

15-16

48% covers · avg −0.4 pts vs the line

Over / Under

14-17

45% overs · avg −1.5 pts vs the total

Straight up

19-1261%

W L L W W W W L W L W W L W L W W L L W W L W W L W W L W W L

2 of last 4 wonno streak

Against the spread

15-1648%

W L L W W W W L W L W W L W L L W L L L W L L W L W W L W L L

2 straight misses ATS1 of last 4 covered

Over / Under

14-1745%

O O U U O U U U U O O U U O U O U O U O U O U U U O U U O O O

3 straight overs3 of last 4 over

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 3	vsMVSU	W 106-55	-34.5	W +16.5	145.5	O 161
Nov 7	@NCSU	L 70-94	+19.5	L −4.5	162.5	O 164
Nov 11	vsALST	L 74-77	-19.5	L −22.5	164.5	U 151
Nov 14	vsHPU	W 91-74	+1.5	W +18.5	168.5	U 165
Nov 21	vsUSA	W 80-72	-7.5	W +0.5	149.5	O 152
Nov 24	vsSIU	W 81-73	-2.5	W +5.5	161.5	U 154
Nov 25	vsUTEP	W 75-59	-8.5	W +7.5	146.5	U 134
Dec 1	@MTSU	L 61-76	-1.5	L −16.5	153.5	U 137
Dec 5	@DRKE	W 74-69	+1.5	W +6.5	148.5	U 143
Dec 14	vsTROY	L 85-86	-6.5	L −7.5	155.5	O 171
Dec 17	vsCLE	W 101-77	-18.5	W +5.5	156.5	O 178
Dec 21	vsUNCA	W 72-47	-13.5	W +11.5	151.5	U 119
Dec 31	vsWICH	L 70-75	-3.5	L −8.5	149.5	U 145
Jan 4	@USF	W 109-106	+8.5	W +11.5	163.5	O 215
Jan 7	vsFAU	L 71-76	-3.5	L −8.5	162.5	U 147
Jan 11	@ECU	W 87-85	-7.5	L −5.5	150.5	O 172
Jan 14	@TULN	W 82-69	-1.5	W +11.5	153.5	U 151
Jan 18	vsTLSA	L 77-99	-1.5	L −23.5	159.5	O 176
Jan 22	vsUSF	L 69-82	+2.5	L −10.5	168.5	U 151
Jan 28	@UTSA	W 83-73	-12.5	L −2.5	155.5	O 156
Jan 31	@UNT	W 72-68	+1.5	W +5.5	141.5	U 140
Feb 5	vsMEM	L 80-90	-1.5	L −11.5	155.5	O 170
Feb 8	vsRICE	W 71-65	-8.5	L −2.5	153.5	U 136
Feb 11	@TLSA	W 68-63	+10.5	W +15.5	161.5	U 131
Feb 15	vsTULN	L 54-55	-6.5	L −7.5	152.5	U 109
Feb 18	@TEM	W 76-71	+1.5	W +6.5	143.5	O 147
Feb 22	@MEM	W 78-67	+5.5	W +16.5	152.5	U 145
Mar 1	vsUNT	L 58-62	-4.5	L −8.5	142.5	U 120
Mar 4	@CLT	W 80-74	-2.5	W +3.5	146.5	O 154
Mar 8	vsECU	W 90-83	-10.5	L −3.5	151.5	O 173
Mar 13	vsCLT	L 78-83	-5.5	L −10.5	147.5	O 161

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

MVSU

W 106-55

+16.5

NCSU

L 70-94

−4.5

ALST

L 74-77

−22.5

HPU

W 91-74

+18.5

USA

W 80-72

+0.5

SIU

W 81-73

+5.5

UTEP

W 75-59

+7.5

MTSU

L 61-76

−16.5

DRKE

W 74-69

+6.5

TROY

L 85-86

−7.5

CLE

W 101-77

+5.5

UNCA

W 72-47

+11.5

WICH

L 70-75

−8.5

USF

W 109-106

+11.5

FAU

L 71-76

−8.5

ECU

W 87-85

−5.5

TULN

W 82-69

+11.5

TLSA

L 77-99

−23.5

USF

L 69-82

−10.5

UTSA

W 83-73

−2.5

UNT

W 72-68

+5.5

MEM

L 80-90

−11.5

RICE

W 71-65

−2.5

TLSA

W 68-63

+15.5

TULN

L 54-55

−7.5

TEM

W 76-71

+6.5

MEM

W 78-67

+16.5

UNT

L 58-62

−8.5

CLT

W 80-74

+3.5

ECU

W 90-83

−3.5

CLT

L 78-83

−10.5

covered 15didn’t cover 16avg −0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

MVSU

W 106-55

+15.5

NCSU

L 70-94

+1.5

ALST

L 74-77

−13.5

HPU

W 91-74

−3.5

USA

W 80-72

+2.5

SIU

W 81-73

−7.5

UTEP

W 75-59

−12.5

MTSU

L 61-76

−16.5

DRKE

W 74-69

−5.5

TROY

L 85-86

+15.5

CLE

W 101-77

+21.5

UNCA

W 72-47

−32.5

WICH

L 70-75

−4.5

USF

W 109-106

+51.5

FAU

L 71-76

−15.5

ECU

W 87-85

+21.5

TULN

W 82-69

−2.5

TLSA

L 77-99

+16.5

USF

L 69-82

−17.5

UTSA

W 83-73

+0.5

UNT

W 72-68

−1.5

MEM

L 80-90

+14.5

RICE

W 71-65

−17.5

TLSA

W 68-63

−30.5

TULN

L 54-55

−43.5

TEM

W 76-71

+3.5

MEM

W 78-67

−7.5

UNT

L 58-62

−22.5

CLT

W 80-74

+7.5

ECU

W 90-83

+21.5

CLT

L 78-83

+13.5

over 14under 17avg −1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin

McNeese

32 games played

Straight up

26-6

81% wins

Against the spread

16-16

50% covers · avg +0.1 pts vs the line

Over / Under

15-17

47% overs · avg −0.9 pts vs the total

Straight up

26-681%

L W W W W L W W W W L W W W W L W W W W L W W W W W W W W W W L

3 of last 4 wonno streak

Against the spread

16-1650%

L W W W W L W W W L L L L L W L W W L L L W L W L W L L W L W W

2 straight covers3 of last 4 covered

Over / Under

15-1747%

U O O U U U O U O O O O U U O O U U O U U U O O O U U U U O O U

2 of last 4 overno streak

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 7	@SCU	L 67-79	+6.5	L −5.5	151.5	U 146
Nov 14	vsUL	W 88-62	-15.5	W +10.5	134.5	O 150
Nov 23	vsGW	W 92-86	+5.5	W +11.5	157.5	O 178
Nov 24	vsMUR	W 73-60	-2.5	W +10.5	158.5	U 133
Nov 25	vsMTSU	W 72-62	-9.5	W +0.5	147.5	U 134
Dec 1	@UIW	L 67-71	-10.5	L −14.5	145.5	U 138
Dec 5	vsNWST	W 92-54	-19.5	W +18.5	139.5	O 146
Dec 9	@URI	W 66-64	-1.5	W +0.5	146.5	U 130
Dec 12	vsETAM	W 102-66	-20.5	W +15.5	142.5	O 168
Dec 15	@HCU	W 78-68	-14.5	L −4.5	137.5	O 146
Dec 29	@MICH	L 71-112	+24.5	L −16.5	161.5	O 183
Jan 2	vsLAM	W 82-70	-16.5	L −4.5	145.5	O 152
Jan 5	vsSFA	W 66-64	-10.5	L −8.5	144.5	U 130
Jan 10	vsSELA	W 73-61	-16.5	L −4.5	138.5	U 134
Jan 12	vsNICH	W 94-68	-15.5	W +10.5	146.5	O 162
Jan 17	@RGV	L 76-79	-9.5	L −12.5	146.5	O 155
Jan 19	@AMCC	W 69-53	-9.5	W +6.5	140.5	U 122
Jan 24	vsNOLA	W 82-63	-18.5	W +0.5	156.5	U 145
Jan 27	@SELA	W 76-66	-12.5	L −2.5	139.5	O 142
Jan 31	@LAM	W 64-63	-10.5	L −9.5	144.5	U 127
Feb 2	@SFA	L 60-67	-2.5	L −9.5	141.5	U 127
Feb 7	vsUIW	W 81-64	-16.5	W +0.5	145.5	U 145
Feb 9	vsHCU	W 73-69	-21.5	L −17.5	137.5	O 142
Feb 14	@ETAM	W 97-54	-13.5	W +29.5	142.5	O 151
Feb 16	@NWST	W 75-64	-14.5	L −3.5	138.5	O 139
Feb 21	vsAMCC	W 70-54	-14.5	W +1.5	139.5	U 124
Feb 23	vsRGV	W 75-68	-11.5	L −4.5	146.5	U 143
Feb 28	@NOLA	W 66-63	-10.5	L −7.5	150.5	U 129
Mar 2	@NICH	W 75-65	-9.5	W +0.5	145.5	U 140
Mar 10	vsRGV	W 84-80	-8.5	L −4.5	140.5	O 164
Mar 11	vsSFA	W 76-59	-3.5	W +13.5	134.5	O 135
Mar 19	vsVAN	L 68-78	+12.5	W +2.5	148.5	U 146

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

SCU

L 67-79

−5.5

W 88-62

+10.5

W 92-86

+11.5

MUR

W 73-60

+10.5

MTSU

W 72-62

+0.5

UIW

L 67-71

−14.5

NWST

W 92-54

+18.5

URI

W 66-64

+0.5

ETAM

W 102-66

+15.5

HCU

W 78-68

−4.5

MICH

L 71-112

−16.5

LAM

W 82-70

−4.5

SFA

W 66-64

−8.5

SELA

W 73-61

−4.5

NICH

W 94-68

+10.5

RGV

L 76-79

−12.5

AMCC

W 69-53

+6.5

NOLA

W 82-63

+0.5

SELA

W 76-66

−2.5

LAM

W 64-63

−9.5

SFA

L 60-67

−9.5

UIW

W 81-64

+0.5

HCU

W 73-69

−17.5

ETAM

W 97-54

+29.5

NWST

W 75-64

−3.5

AMCC

W 70-54

+1.5

RGV

W 75-68

−4.5

NOLA

W 66-63

−7.5

NICH

W 75-65

+0.5

RGV

W 84-80

−4.5

SFA

W 76-59

+13.5

VAN

L 68-78

+2.5

covered 16didn’t cover 16avg +0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

SCU

L 67-79

−5.5

W 88-62

+15.5

W 92-86

+20.5

MUR

W 73-60

−25.5

MTSU

W 72-62

−13.5

UIW

L 67-71

−7.5

NWST

W 92-54

+6.5

URI

W 66-64

−16.5

ETAM

W 102-66

+25.5

HCU

W 78-68

+8.5

MICH

L 71-112

+21.5

LAM

W 82-70

+6.5

SFA

W 66-64

−14.5

SELA

W 73-61

−4.5

NICH

W 94-68

+15.5

RGV

L 76-79

+8.5

AMCC

W 69-53

−18.5

NOLA

W 82-63

−11.5

SELA

W 76-66

+2.5

LAM

W 64-63

−17.5

SFA

L 60-67

−14.5

UIW

W 81-64

−0.5

HCU

W 73-69

+4.5

ETAM

W 97-54

+8.5

NWST

W 75-64

+0.5

AMCC

W 70-54

−15.5

RGV

W 75-68

−3.5

NOLA

W 66-63

−21.5

NICH

W 75-65

−5.5

RGV

W 84-80

+23.5

SFA

W 76-59

+0.5

VAN

L 68-78

−2.5

over 15under 17avg −0.9 ptslonger = bigger margin

Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.

The starting fives are even

Position by position: UAB 2, McNeese 2, even 1

UABBetterMcNeese

G J. Fernandez TR16.6 pts · 4.6 reb · 2.1 ast Score 56

MCNBig

G L. Johnson16.8 pts · 5.5 reb · 1.4 ast Score 98

G J. Elyzee TR11.1 pts · 4.5 reb · 1.7 ast Score 61

UABSmall

G C. Cherenfant3.6 pts · 2.9 reb · 0.9 ast Score 38

G D. Jones TR16.4 pts · 4 reb · 3.4 ast Score 91

No call

G D. Warren TR1.2 pts · 0.4 reb · 0.9 ast Not ranked

G E. Duval TR15.6 pts · 4 reb · 3.5 ast Score 74

UABBig

F J. Colbert5.3 pts · 4.1 reb · 0.5 ast Score 29

G T. Caldwell TR9 pts · 2.6 reb · 1 ast Score 56

MCNSmall

F C. Chest TR2.6 pts · 3.8 reb · 0.6 ast Score 71

UABBetterMcNeese

UAB offense82nd of 366 · +0.4

Even

MCN defense117th of 366 · -1.6

UAB defense141st of 366 · -3.1

Even

MCN offense153rd of 366 · -4.7

Backcourt+2.8 · 5 players

Even

Backcourt+3.2 · 3 players

FrontcourtNo numbers yet

No call

Frontcourt-0.6 · 2 players

Bench-1.4 · 2 players

MCNSmall

Bench-0.3 · 4 players

Score, worst to bestUAB betterMCN betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers

Projected starters: college teams publish no depth chart, so these come from minutes played, and a freshman or a new starter can change them. The score is the share of ranked players at the position that player is ahead of. Numbers are this season's once a player has 30 minutes, 2025-26's before that. Bench is the next five by minutes. Tap a player for the full numbers.

Depth chart

Projected rotation by position, starters outlined

UAB

Guards

J. Fernandez37 min · TRJ. Elyzee30 min · TRD. Jones29 min · TRE. Duval27 min · TRT. Caldwell20 min · TRS. London20 min

Forwards

A. Alston8 min · TRA. Sandlin-ElNew

Centers

M. MboleNewK. DavisNew

McNeese

Guards

L. Johnson26 minC. Cherenfant16 minD. Warren8 min · TRE. Moore5 min · TRJ. Rembert4 minJ. Dean-Vines3 min · TR

Forwards

J. Colbert20 minC. Chest13 min · TRA. Maluk7 min · TRC. NituNewM. MadisonNewA. MazouNew

In order of minutes, from rosters as of today. ESPN lists players only as guards, forwards or centers, and no injury report exists for college basketball, so a player who is out may still show here.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

Matchup stats

2025-26 · rank among 365 teams

ChartTable

Scoring

Points per game

UAB78.2 #92

MCN76.6 #131

Points per possession

UAB1.10 #141

MCN1.14 #69

Pace (possessions)

UAB71.2 #61

MCN67.1 #276

Shooting

Effective FG%

UAB48.4 #305

MCN50.7 #202

3-point %

UAB27.8 #364

MCN31.7 #290

3-point attempt rate

UAB30.5 #350

MCN35.2 #269

Free throw rate

UAB36.4 #141

MCN37.4 #114

Possessions

Turnover rate

UAB12.6 #2

MCN14.2 #28

Offensive rebound rate

UAB32.5 #104

MCN35.1 #46

Assists per game

UAB14.2 #135

MCN13.1 #205

Defense

Points allowed

UAB74.3 #168

MCN67.4 #23

Points allowed per possession

UAB1.04 #79

MCN1.00 #27

Opponent effective FG%

UAB50.0 #98

MCN49.3 #76

Opponent 3-point %

UAB32.6 #95

MCN32.7 #102

Turnovers forced

UAB16.1 #217

MCN24.4 #1

Defensive rebound rate

UAB72.3 #53

MCN65.1 #338

Steals per game

UAB7.5 #74

MCN10.3 #1

Blocks per game

UAB3.5 #139

MCN4.4 #42

UAB		MCN
Scoring
78.2 #92	Points per game	76.6 #131
1.10 #141	Points per possession	1.14 #69
71.2 #61	Pace (possessions)	67.1 #276
Shooting
48.4 #305	Effective FG%	50.7 #202
27.8 #364	3-point %	31.7 #290
30.5 #350	3-point attempt rate	35.2 #269
36.4 #141	Free throw rate	37.4 #114
Possessions
12.6 #2	Turnover rate	14.2 #28
32.5 #104	Offensive rebound rate	35.1 #46
14.2 #135	Assists per game	13.1 #205
Defense
74.3 #168	Points allowed	67.4 #23
1.04 #79	Points allowed per possession	1.00 #27
50.0 #98	Opponent effective FG%	49.3 #76
32.6 #95	Opponent 3-point %	32.7 #102
16.1 #217	Turnovers forced	24.4 #1
72.3 #53	Defensive rebound rate	65.1 #338
7.5 #74	Steals per game	10.3 #1
3.5 #139	Blocks per game	4.4 #42

From the box scores. A longer bar is a better national rank, on every row; the better team's bar is solid. A green rank is near the top of Division I, a red one near the bottom. Pace and 3-point rate are styles, so they have no better side.

UAB

19-12 in 2025-26 overall · 11-8 in conference · American Conference

Last five, 2025-26

Lvs Charlotte78–83
Wvs East Carolina90–83
W@ Charlotte80–74
Lvs North Texas58–62
W@ Memphis78–67

A week or more of rest.

McNeese

26-6 in 2025-26 overall · 21-3 in conference · Southland Conference

Last five, 2025-26

Lvs Vanderbilt68–78
Wvs SF Austin76–59
Wvs UT Rio Grande84–80
W@ Nicholls75–65
W@ LSU N Orleans66–63

A week or more of rest.