Bartow Arena · at UAB · Conference game
Closing line
UAB -10.5✓ ECU covered by 3.5
Closing total151.5Over by 21.5
| This season | UAB | |
|---|---|---|
| 10-19 | Record | 18-11 |
| 11-18 | ATS | 15-14 |
| 15-14 | O/U | 12-17 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: ECU 71–82 UAB · ✓ UAB (83%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ECU | 44 | 39 | 83 |
| UAB | 41 | 49 | 90 |
1st half: ECU 44, UAB 41 (ECU by 3). The model had UAB by 6.3 and a total of 71.6 (actual 85).
Team stats
| ECU | UAB | |
|---|---|---|
| 30-73 41% | Field goals | 35-64 55% |
| 7-22 32% | 3-pointers | 4-12 33% |
| 16-21 76% | Free throws | 16-22 73% |
| 44 18 off | Rebounds | 34 7 off |
| 14 | Assists | 20 |
| 6 | Steals | 8 |
| 2 | Blocks | 4 |
| 12 | Turnovers | 8 |
| 13 | Fouls | 14 |
| 36 | Points in paint | 56 |
| 3 | Fast-break points | 34 |
Players
| ECU | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jordan Riley G | 38 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 3-20 | 0-4 |
| Demitri Gardner G | 36 | 19 | 2 | 2 | 8-13 | 3-5 |
| Giovanni Emejuru C | 35 | 15 | 14 | 1 | 5-9 | 0-0 |
| Corey Caulker G | 34 | 13 | 1 | 5 | 5-15 | 3-8 |
| Luke Davis F | 26 | 9 | 8 | 2 | 3-5 | 1-2 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Reid Cason F | 19 | 14 | 4 | 0 | 6-8 | 0-0 |
| Isaiah Mbeng G | 11 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0-2 | 0-2 |
| Patrick D'Arcy G | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
Did not play: Vito Perkovic, Jake Baker, Daithi Quinn, Trevion LaBeaux, Tybo Bailey, Ladontae Felton, Jayshayne Woodard, Grant Smith, Eli DeLaurier
| UAB | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jacob Meyer G | 36 | 18 | 6 | 2 | 6-10 | 4-5 |
| Chance Westry G | 35 | 22 | 4 | 10 | 8-11 | 0-2 |
| Daniel Rivera F | 29 | 22 | 5 | 3 | 9-10 | 0-0 |
| Evan Chatman F | 23 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1-10 | 0-0 |
| Dayjaun Anderson G | 19 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 3-6 | 0-3 |
| Bench | ||||||
| KyeRon Lindsay-Martin F | 26 | 12 | 8 | 3 | 5-9 | 0-0 |
| Quaran McPherson G | 18 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 3-5 | 0-1 |
| Salim London G | 14 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-3 | 0-1 |
Did not play: Ari Gooch, Jorden Pittman, Justin Holloway, Lance Carr, Ahmad Robinson, Joey Kahn, Joao Das Chagas
Loading the game…
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenUAB -10.5
no move
CloseUAB -10.5
No change since the open
Total
Open146.5
▲ 5
Close151.5
Up 5 since the open
Moneyline
ECU +440 · UAB -600
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened UAB -10.5 · unchangedmodel UAB -10.5 matches the line
model UAB -10.5 = line ✓
Opened 146.5 · closed 151.5 · moved 5 upmodel 153
model 153
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | Result | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | UAB -10.5 | UAB -10.7 | UAB +0.2 | L ECU covered |
| Total | 151.5 | 153.0 | Over 1.5 | W Over |
| Projected score | — | ECU 71.1 · UAB 81.9 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | UAB -6.3 | ECU -3.0 |
| 1H total | 71.6 | 85 |
| 1H projected score | ECU 32.7 · UAB 38.9 | ECU 44 · UAB 41 |
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | 7-3 70% | |
| 7-3 70% | 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
ECU 1–3 UABUAB leads · 4 games since 2021-22 · UAB has won the last 2 meetings · ECU 2-2 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2025-26 | UAB 87 @ ECU 85 | ECU +7.5 | ECU W |
| Mar 14, 2024-25 | ECU 77 vs UAB 94 | UAB -5.5 | UAB W |
| Feb 11, 2024-25 | UAB 75 @ ECU 82 | ECU +2.5 | ECU W |
| Jan 20, 2023-24 | ECU 61 @ UAB 69 | UAB -4.5 | UAB W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
East Carolina
29 games played
Straight up
10-19
34% wins
Against the spread
11-18
38% covers · avg −2.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-14
52% overs · avg +3.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | W 92-89 | -5.5 | L −2.5 | 151.5 | O 181 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 72-87 | +5.5 | L −9.5 | 143.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 60-85 | +6.5 | L −18.5 | 145.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 65-77 | -13.5 | L −25.5 | 157.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 56-89 | +19.5 | L −13.5 | 140.5 | O 145 |
| Nov 27 | vs | L 58-67 | +10.5 | W +1.5 | 144.5 | U 125 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 68-56 | -12.5 | L −0.5 | 127.5 | U 124 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 78-82 | -7.5 | L −11.5 | 139.5 | O 160 |
| Dec 11 | vs | L 54-67 | -4.5 | L −17.5 | 130.5 | U 121 |
| Dec 14 | vs | W 73-70 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 146.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 74-53 | -4.5 | W +16.5 | 131.5 | U 127 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 51-99 | +25.5 | L −22.5 | 144.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 70-79 | +1.5 | L −7.5 | 145.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 67-75 | +7.5 | L −0.5 | 143.5 | U 142 |
| Jan 11 | vs | L 85-87 | +7.5 | W +5.5 | 150.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 71-82 | +18.5 | W +7.5 | 158.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 18 | vs | L 70-73 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 139.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 60-77 | +12.5 | L −4.5 | 144.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 23 | @ | W 63-59 | +10.5 | W +14.5 | 134.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 28 | vs | L 77-83 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 140.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 1 | @ | W 76-75 | +10.5 | W +11.5 | 153.5 | U 151 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 73-81 | +2.5 | L −5.5 | 140.5 | O 154 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 88-72 | -10.5 | W +5.5 | 150.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 85-75 | +4.5 | W +14.5 | 146.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 89-92 | +7.5 | W +4.5 | 149.5 | O 181 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 56-68 | +4.5 | L −7.5 | 145.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 25 | @ | W 82-81 | -4.5 | L −3.5 | 153.5 | O 163 |
| Mar 1 | vs | W 84-68 | +4.5 | W +20.5 | 152.5 | U 152 |
| Mar 5 | vs | L 66-93 | +8.5 | L −18.5 | 156.5 | O 159 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
GASO
W 92-89
−2.5
8
@
RICH
L 72-87
−9.5
18
@
UNCW
L 60-85
−18.5
21
vs
CHSO
L 65-77
−25.5
25
vs
MSU
L 56-89
−13.5
27
vs
SBU
L 58-67
+1.5
2
vs
UMES
W 68-56
−0.5
6
vs
UNCG
L 78-82
−11.5
11
vs
APP
L 54-67
−17.5
14
vs
BUF
W 73-70
+1.5
17
vs
PRES
W 74-53
+16.5
22
@
UNC
L 51-99
−22.5
31
vs
TULN
L 70-79
−7.5
7
@
TEM
L 67-75
−0.5
11
vs
UAB
L 85-87
+5.5
14
@
USF
L 71-82
+7.5
18
vs
CLT
L 70-73
−4.5
21
@
WICH
L 60-77
−4.5
23
@
UNT
W 63-59
+14.5
28
vs
RICE
L 77-83
−8.5
1
@
FAU
W 76-75
+11.5
7
vs
TEM
L 73-81
−5.5
11
vs
UTSA
W 88-72
+5.5
14
@
RICE
W 85-75
+14.5
18
vs
WICH
L 89-92
+4.5
21
@
CLT
L 56-68
−7.5
25
@
UTSA
W 82-81
−3.5
1
vs
MEM
W 84-68
+20.5
5
vs
TLSA
L 66-93
−18.5
covered 11didn’t cover 18avg −2.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
GASO
W 92-89
+29.5
8
@
RICH
L 72-87
+15.5
18
@
UNCW
L 60-85
−0.5
21
vs
CHSO
L 65-77
−15.5
25
vs
MSU
L 56-89
+4.5
27
vs
SBU
L 58-67
−19.5
2
vs
UMES
W 68-56
−3.5
6
vs
UNCG
L 78-82
+20.5
11
vs
APP
L 54-67
−9.5
14
vs
BUF
W 73-70
−3.5
17
vs
PRES
W 74-53
−4.5
22
@
UNC
L 51-99
+5.5
31
vs
TULN
L 70-79
+3.5
7
@
TEM
L 67-75
−1.5
11
vs
UAB
L 85-87
+21.5
14
@
USF
L 71-82
−5.5
18
vs
CLT
L 70-73
+3.5
21
@
WICH
L 60-77
−7.5
23
@
UNT
W 63-59
−12.5
28
vs
RICE
L 77-83
+19.5
1
@
FAU
W 76-75
−2.5
7
vs
TEM
L 73-81
+13.5
11
vs
UTSA
W 88-72
+9.5
14
@
RICE
W 85-75
+13.5
18
vs
WICH
L 89-92
+31.5
21
@
CLT
L 56-68
−21.5
25
@
UTSA
W 82-81
+9.5
1
vs
MEM
W 84-68
−0.5
5
vs
TLSA
L 66-93
+2.5
over 15under 14avg +3.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
UAB
29 games played
Straight up
18-11
62% wins
Against the spread
15-14
52% covers · avg +0.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
12-17
41% overs · avg −2.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 106-55 | -34.5 | W +16.5 | 145.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 7 | @ | L 70-94 | +19.5 | L −4.5 | 162.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 11 | vs | L 74-77 | -19.5 | L −22.5 | 164.5 | U 151 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 91-74 | +1.5 | W +18.5 | 168.5 | U 165 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 80-72 | -7.5 | W +0.5 | 149.5 | O 152 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 81-73 | -2.5 | W +5.5 | 161.5 | U 154 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 75-59 | -8.5 | W +7.5 | 146.5 | U 134 |
| Dec 1 | @ | L 61-76 | -1.5 | L −16.5 | 153.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 5 | @ | W 74-69 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 148.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 14 | vs | L 85-86 | -6.5 | L −7.5 | 155.5 | O 171 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 101-77 | -18.5 | W +5.5 | 156.5 | O 178 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 72-47 | -13.5 | W +11.5 | 151.5 | U 119 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 70-75 | -3.5 | L −8.5 | 149.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 4 | @ | W 109-106 | +8.5 | W +11.5 | 163.5 | O 215 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 71-76 | -3.5 | L −8.5 | 162.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 11 | @ | W 87-85 | -7.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 82-69 | -1.5 | W +11.5 | 153.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 18 | vs | L 77-99 | -1.5 | L −23.5 | 159.5 | O 176 |
| Jan 22 | vs | L 69-82 | +2.5 | L −10.5 | 168.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 83-73 | -12.5 | L −2.5 | 155.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 72-68 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 141.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 5 | vs | L 80-90 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 155.5 | O 170 |
| Feb 8 | vs | W 71-65 | -8.5 | L −2.5 | 153.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 68-63 | +10.5 | W +15.5 | 161.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 15 | vs | L 54-55 | -6.5 | L −7.5 | 152.5 | U 109 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 76-71 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 143.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 22 | @ | W 78-67 | +5.5 | W +16.5 | 152.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 1 | vs | L 58-62 | -4.5 | L −8.5 | 142.5 | U 120 |
| Mar 4 | @ | W 80-74 | -2.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | O 154 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
MVSU
W 106-55
+16.5
7
@
NCSU
L 70-94
−4.5
11
vs
ALST
L 74-77
−22.5
14
vs
HPU
W 91-74
+18.5
21
vs
USA
W 80-72
+0.5
24
vs
SIU
W 81-73
+5.5
25
vs
UTEP
W 75-59
+7.5
1
@
MTSU
L 61-76
−16.5
5
@
DRKE
W 74-69
+6.5
14
vs
TROY
L 85-86
−7.5
17
vs
CLE
W 101-77
+5.5
21
vs
UNCA
W 72-47
+11.5
31
vs
WICH
L 70-75
−8.5
4
@
USF
W 109-106
+11.5
7
vs
FAU
L 71-76
−8.5
11
@
ECU
W 87-85
−5.5
14
@
TULN
W 82-69
+11.5
18
vs
TLSA
L 77-99
−23.5
22
vs
USF
L 69-82
−10.5
28
@
UTSA
W 83-73
−2.5
31
@
UNT
W 72-68
+5.5
5
vs
MEM
L 80-90
−11.5
8
vs
RICE
W 71-65
−2.5
11
@
TLSA
W 68-63
+15.5
15
vs
TULN
L 54-55
−7.5
18
@
TEM
W 76-71
+6.5
22
@
MEM
W 78-67
+16.5
1
vs
UNT
L 58-62
−8.5
4
@
CLT
W 80-74
+3.5
covered 15didn’t cover 14avg +0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
MVSU
W 106-55
+15.5
7
@
NCSU
L 70-94
+1.5
11
vs
ALST
L 74-77
−13.5
14
vs
HPU
W 91-74
−3.5
21
vs
USA
W 80-72
+2.5
24
vs
SIU
W 81-73
−7.5
25
vs
UTEP
W 75-59
−12.5
1
@
MTSU
L 61-76
−16.5
5
@
DRKE
W 74-69
−5.5
14
vs
TROY
L 85-86
+15.5
17
vs
CLE
W 101-77
+21.5
21
vs
UNCA
W 72-47
−32.5
31
vs
WICH
L 70-75
−4.5
4
@
USF
W 109-106
+51.5
7
vs
FAU
L 71-76
−15.5
11
@
ECU
W 87-85
+21.5
14
@
TULN
W 82-69
−2.5
18
vs
TLSA
L 77-99
+16.5
22
vs
USF
L 69-82
−17.5
28
@
UTSA
W 83-73
+0.5
31
@
UNT
W 72-68
−1.5
5
vs
MEM
L 80-90
+14.5
8
vs
RICE
W 71-65
−17.5
11
@
TLSA
W 68-63
−30.5
15
vs
TULN
L 54-55
−43.5
18
@
TEM
W 76-71
+3.5
22
@
MEM
W 78-67
−7.5
1
vs
UNT
L 58-62
−22.5
4
@
CLT
W 80-74
+7.5
over 12under 17avg −2.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
East Carolina
10-19 overall · 6-11 in conference · American Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Tulsa66–93
- Wvs Memphis84–68
- W@ UTSA82–81
- L@ Charlotte56–68
- Lvs Wichita St89–92
3 days since their last game.
UAB
18-11 overall · 10-7 in conference · American Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- W@ Charlotte80–74
- Lvs North Texas58–62
- W@ Memphis78–67
- W@ Temple76–71
- Lvs Tulane54–55
4 days since their last game.