Jersey Mike’s Arena · at Rutgers · Conference game
Closing line
PUR -13.5✓ PUR covered by 2.5
PUR -13.5✓ PUR covered by 2.5Closing total146.5Under by 0.5
| PUR | This season | RUTG |
|---|---|---|
| 7-0 | Record | 5-3 |
| 3-4 | ATS | 3-5 |
| 3-4 | O/U | 4-4 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: PUR 84–65 RUTG · ✓ PUR (95%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| PUR | 40 | 41 | 81 |
| RUTG | 27 | 38 | 65 |
1st half: PUR 40, RUTG 27 (PUR by 13). The model had PUR by 11.7 and a total of 70.0 (actual 67).
Team stats
| PUR | RUTG | |
|---|---|---|
| 27-58 47% | Field goals | 25-56 45% |
| 10-26 38% | 3-pointers | 8-17 47% |
| 17-20 85% | Free throws | 7-11 64% |
| 36 11 off | Rebounds | 25 6 off |
| 18 | Assists | 12 |
| 4 | Steals | 6 |
| 2 | Blocks | 2 |
| 9 | Turnovers | 9 |
| 14 | Fouls | 18 |
| 30 | Points in paint | 24 |
| 14 | Fast-break points | 7 |
Players
| PUR | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Braden Smith G | 35 | 16 | 3 | 8 | 5-11 | 4-8 |
| Trey Kaufman-Renn F | 32 | 19 | 13 | 3 | 7-11 | 0-0 |
| Fletcher Loyer G | 28 | 12 | 2 | 2 | 3-11 | 2-7 |
| Oscar Cluff C | 24 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 4-8 | 0-0 |
| C.J. Cox G | 23 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1-5 | 0-3 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Gicarri Harris G | 21 | 11 | 2 | 2 | 4-5 | 3-4 |
| Omer Mayer G | 13 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1-5 | 0-3 |
| Daniel Jacobsen C | 13 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| Liam Murphy F | 11 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1-1 | 1-1 |
Did not play: Jace Rayl, Antione West Jr, Sam King, Aaron Fine, Jack Lusk, Jack Benter, Raleigh Burgess
| RUTG | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jamichael Davis G | 31 | 9 | 0 | 5 | 3-4 | 1-2 |
| Darren Buchanan Jr. G | 24 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 3-8 | 1-2 |
| Dylan Grant F | 24 | 13 | 2 | 0 | 5-10 | 1-3 |
| Tariq Francis G | 19 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2-5 | 1-1 |
| Emmanuel Ogbole C | 19 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 1-5 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Chris Nwuli F | 17 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| Harun Zrno G | 16 | 13 | 1 | 2 | 5-8 | 3-5 |
| Lino Mark G | 13 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| Bryce Ruglass Dortch F | 13 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| Kaden Powers G | 12 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 2-6 | 1-2 |
| Gevonte Ware C | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Denis Badalau F | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1-3 | 0-2 |
| Baye Fall C | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Max Fradkin, Dorian Jones
Loading the game…
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenPUR -16.5
3 → RUTG
ClosePUR -13.5
3 pts toward RUTG
Total
Open144.5
▲ 2
Close146.5
Up 2 since the open
Moneyline
—
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened PUR -16.5 · closed PUR -13.5 · moved 3 toward RUTGmodel PUR -19
model PUR -19
Opened 144.5 · closed 146.5 · moved 2 upmodel 149.5
model 149.5
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | Result | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | PUR -13.5 | PUR -19.1 | PUR +5.6 | W PUR covered |
| Total | 146.5 | 149.5 | Over 3.0 | L Under |
| Projected score | — | PUR 84.3 · RUTG 65.2 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | PUR -11.7 | PUR -13.0 |
| 1H total | 70.0 | 67 |
| 1H projected score | PUR 40.8 · RUTG 29.2 | PUR 40 · RUTG 27 |
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| PURlast 7 | 7-0 100% | 3-4 43% | 3-4 43% |
| RUTGlast 8 | 5-3 63% | 3-5 38% | 4-4 50% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 8 since 2021-22
PUR 6–2 RUTGPUR leads · 8 games since 2021-22 · PUR has won the last 5 meetings · PUR 3-5 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2024-25 | RUTG 71 @ PUR 100 | PUR -11.5 | PUR W |
| Jan 9, 2024-25 | PUR 68 @ RUTG 50 | RUTG +2.5 | PUR W |
| Feb 22, 2023-24 | RUTG 68 @ PUR 96 | PUR -14.5 | PUR W |
| Jan 28, 2023-24 | PUR 68 @ RUTG 60 | RUTG +10.5 | RUTG W |
| Mar 10, 2022-23 | RUTG 65 vs PUR 70 | PUR -5.5 | RUTG W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Purdue
7 games played
Straight up
7-0
100% wins
Against the spread
3-4
43% covers · avg +1.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
3-4
43% overs · avg +1.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs EVAN | W 82-51 | -33.5 | L −2.5 | 150.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 7 | vs OAK | W 87-77 | -31.5 | L −21.5 | 158.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 13 | @ ALA | W 87-80 | +3.5 | W +10.5 | 172.5 | U 167 |
| Nov 16 | vs AKR | W 97-79 | -18.5 | L −0.5 | 163.5 | O 176 |
| Nov 20 | vs MEM | W 80-71 | -14.5 | L −5.5 | 156.5 | U 151 |
| Nov 21 | vs TTU | W 86-56 | -3.5 | W +26.5 | 153.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 28 | vs EIU | W 109-62 | -40.5 | W +6.5 | 141.5 | O 171 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vsEVAN
EVANW 82-51
−2.5
7
vsOAK
OAKW 87-77
−21.5
13
@ALA
ALAW 87-80
+10.5
16
vsAKR
AKRW 97-79
−0.5
20
vsMEM
MEMW 80-71
−5.5
21
vsTTU
TTUW 86-56
+26.5
28
vsEIU
EIUW 109-62
+6.5
covered 3didn’t cover 4avg +1.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vsEVAN
EVANW 82-51
−17.5
7
vsOAK
OAKW 87-77
+5.5
13
@ALA
ALAW 87-80
−5.5
16
vsAKR
AKRW 97-79
+12.5
20
vsMEM
MEMW 80-71
−5.5
21
vsTTU
TTUW 86-56
−11.5
28
vsEIU
EIUW 109-62
+29.5
over 3under 4avg +1.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Rutgers
8 games played
Straight up
5-3
63% wins
Against the spread
3-5
38% covers · avg −3.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
4-4
50% overs · avg −1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5 | vs RID | W 81-53 | -18.5 | W +9.5 | 139.5 | U 134 |
| Nov 10 | vs ME | W 72-60 | -18.5 | L −6.5 | 130.5 | O 132 |
| Nov 14 | vs LEH | W 84-72 | -18.5 | L −6.5 | 136.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 18 | vs AMER | W 80-71 | -16.5 | L −7.5 | 143.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 21 | vs CCSU | L 54-67 | -15.5 | L −28.5 | 137.5 | U 121 |
| Nov 24 | vs TENN | L 60-85 | +14.5 | L −10.5 | 141.5 | O 145 |
| Nov 25 | vs ND | L 63-68 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 140.5 | U 131 |
| Nov 27 | vs UNLV | W 80-65 | +4.5 | W +19.5 | 153.5 | U 145 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
5
vsRID
RIDW 81-53
+9.5
10
vsME
MEW 72-60
−6.5
14
vsLEH
LEHW 84-72
−6.5
18
vsAMER
AMERW 80-71
−7.5
21
vsCCSU
CCSUL 54-67
−28.5
24
vsTENN
TENNL 60-85
−10.5
25
vsND
NDL 63-68
+1.5
27
vsUNLV
UNLVW 80-65
+19.5
covered 3didn’t cover 5avg −3.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
5
vsRID
RIDW 81-53
−5.5
10
vsME
MEW 72-60
+1.5
14
vsLEH
LEHW 84-72
+19.5
18
vsAMER
AMERW 80-71
+7.5
21
vsCCSU
CCSUL 54-67
−16.5
24
vsTENN
TENNL 60-85
+3.5
25
vsND
NDL 63-68
−9.5
27
vsUNLV
UNLVW 80-65
−8.5
over 4under 4avg −1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Purdue
7-0 overall · 0-0 in conference · Big Ten Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs E Illinois109–62
- Wvs Texas Tech86–56
- Wvs Memphis80–71
- Wvs Akron97–79
- W@ Alabama87–80
4 days since their last game.
Rutgers
5-3 overall · 0-0 in conference · Big Ten Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs UNLV80–65
- Lvs Notre Dame63–68
- Lvs Tennessee60–85
- Lvs C Connecticut54–67
- Wvs American80–71
5 days since their last game.