Sort by

Sort

Sort by
No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
5-6 · #204
36
10-1 · #10 AP #9
39
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.8
Projected
31–42
✓ MSU won
Half finalNon-conference
3-5 · #273
20
9-2 · #14 AP #11
42
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.8
Projected
30–47
✓ LOU won
Half finalNon-conference
5-6 · #291
34
7-4 · #83
57
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 81.4
Projected
35–46
✓ KSU won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
7-3 · #9 AP #22
32
7-4 · #19
25
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.4
Projected
38–36
✓ SJU won
Half finalNon-conference
4-3 · #160
29
Dayton
9-3 · #91
33
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.0
Projected
31–37
✓ DAY won
Half finalNon-conference
5-6 · #325
28
5-5 · #265
40
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.1
Projected
33–36
✓ YSU won
Half finalNon-conference
1-10 · #362
29
8-3 · #38
52
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.3
Projected
26–46
✓ IU won
Half finalNon-conference
4-6 · #332
47
9-2 · #142
42
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.1
Projected
31–41
✗ SBU lost
Half finalConference
8-2 · #237
41
5-5 · #187
28
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.7
Projected
36–36
✗ WMU lost
Half finalNon-conference
7-4 · #168
37
34
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.9
Projected
39–31
✓ RMU won
Half finalConference
1-10 · #208
31
6-5 · #259
28
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.1
Projected
29–35
✗ APP lost
Half finalConference
8-2 · #87
24
8-1 · #58
45
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.3
Projected
33–37
✓ USU won
Half finalNon-conference
Howard
5-5 · #197
38
9-1 · #120
27
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.2
Projected
29–38
✗ UNCW lost
Half finalNon-conference
4-7 · #218
36
0-9 · #357
36
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.9
Projected
36–35
 
Half finalNon-conference
2-9 · #310
43
7-4 · #94
49
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.2
Projected
29–38
✓ GT won
Half finalNon-conference
Iona
8-4 · #233
36
6-5 · #186
40
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.7
Projected
35–38
✓ UVM won
Half finalNon-conference
1-9 · #272
18
2-8 · #331
42
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.5
Projected
30–35
✓ MERC won
Half finalNon-conference
Elon
6-4 · #232
43
10-2 · #68
35
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.1
Projected
34–42
✗ VT lost
Half finalConference
9-0 · #125
40
2-8 · #181
36
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.2
Projected
37–32
✓ M-OH won
Half finalConference
7-2 · #151
35
UMass
8-3 · #209
24
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 78.3
Projected
39–40
✗ MASS lost
Half finalNon-conference
3-7 · #317
24
4-6 · #136
41
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.6
Projected
30–35
✓ HARV won
Half finalConference
7-4 · #231
32
Troy
5-5 · #147
36
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.8
Projected
37–39
✓ TROY won
Half finalConference
5-6 · #283
34
3-8 · #234
29
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.8
Projected
33–36
✗ ODU lost
Half finalNon-conference
Denver
3-7 · #263
40
6-2 · #219
40
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 78.1
Projected
36–42
 
Half finalConference
2-7 · #270
44
2-7 · #334
27
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.4
Projected
35–35
✓ CMU won
Half finalConference
1-11 · #221
39
1-9 · #358
25
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.0
Projected
34–33
✓ UL won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
10-1 · #44 AP #12
34
8-2 · #33
31
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.4
Projected
38–37
✓ UNC won
Half finalConference
8-3 · #228
39
5-6 · #103
25
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.9
Projected
33–33
✗ TXST lost
Half finalNon-conference
4-6 · #76
30
6-5 · #53
34
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.3
Projected
36–38
✓ MSST won
Half finalNon-conference
1-6 · #198
31
ETSU
6-4 · #173
34
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.9
Projected
29–35
✓ ETSU won
Half finalConference
6-4 · #80
45
8-2 · #122
26
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.9
Projected
34–35
✗ WYO lost
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
7-4 · #59
23
Butler
8-3 · #72
29
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.5
Projected
38–38
✗ NU lost
Half finalNon-conference
4-5 · #229
31
7-4 · #63
41
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.7
Projected
29–38
✓ SYR won
Half finalConference
6-3 · #200
42
Ohio
4-6 · #128
29
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.4
Projected
36–36
✓ BGSU won
Half finalConference
5-4 · #341
32
3-6 · #282
31
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.4
Projected
33–35
✗ TNTC lost
Half finalConference
7-4 · #171
39
5-5 · #224
32
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.4
Projected
38–37
✓ ARST won
Half finalConference
2-7 · #306
44
4-4 · #245
37
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.2
Projected
36–37
✗ TNST lost
Half finalConference
2-7 · #350
26
33
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.5
Projected
34–34
✓ USI won
Half finalNon-conference
FGCU
4-6 · #266
49
UCF
9-1 · #39
49
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.3
Projected
34–44
 
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
3-9 · #113
40
8-3 · #106
40
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.2
Projected
31–40
 
Half finalNon-conference
Mercer
5-4 · #242
39
3-8 · #139
41
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.3
Projected
34–37
✓ WSU won
Half finalNon-conference
6-5 · #324
46
FIU
3-4 · #178
44
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.8
Projected
35–38
✗ FIU lost
Half finalConference
6-5 · #158
39
7-5 · #296
37
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.9
Projected
37–37
✗ GASO lost
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
10-1 · #2 AP #8
49
9-2 · #18 AP #14
41
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.5
Projected
36–33
✓ HOU won
Half finalNon-conference
6-5 · #50
19
9-1 · #20 AP #23
24
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.3
Projected
33–39
✓ UVA won
Half finalNon-conference
0-9 · #339
32
8-2 · #104
42
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.9
Projected
29–41
✓ RICH won
Half finalNon-conference
3-9 · #299
21
Iowa
9-2 · #43
43
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.4
Projected
25–41
✓ IOWA won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
Auburn
8-3 · #21 AP #21
32
Purdue
10-1 · #23 AP #6
46
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.3
Projected
36–39
✓ PUR won
Half finalConference
5-5 · #174
41
UNLV
4-6 · #98
39
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.2
Projected
35–39
✗ UNLV lost
Half finalNon-conference
Omaha
2-7 · #279
43
Lamar
3-5 · #293
32
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.6
Projected
33–34
✗ LAM lost
Half finalNon-conference
1-9 · #254
34
Utah
7-4 · #73
50
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.3
Projected
34–42
✓ UTAH won
Half finalNon-conference
3-4 · #274
23
Tulane
7-4 · #130
24
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.4
Projected
34–36
✓ TULN won
Half finalNon-conference
4-6 · #281
38
7-4 · #212
41
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.4
Projected
32–38
✓ STMN won
Half finalNon-conference
1-6 · #196
34
9-3 · #203
38
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.3
Projected
31–39
✓ CBU won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
9-2 · #85
33
10-1 · #65
35
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.0
Projected
37–38
✓ COLO won
Half finalNon-conference
Penn
5-4 · #137
33
5-6 · #62
29
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.3
Projected
32–39
✗ RUTG lost
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
8-3 · #12 AP #19
36
Duke
11-0 · #3 AP #3
46
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.5
Projected
33–38
✓ DUKE won
Half finalConference
Xavier
8-4 · #49
35
8-3 · #64
40
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.0
Projected
35–37
✓ GTWN won
Half finalConference
5-7 · #42
32
6-5 · #37
46
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.5
Projected
33–38
✓ CREI won
Half finalConference
4-6 · #143
28
8-2 · #82
41
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.3
Projected
31–39
✓ UNM won
Half finalNon-conference
Rice
4-6 · #177
29
2-8 · #172
36
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.7
Projected
34–33
✗ RICE lost
Half finalNon-conference
3-6 · #268
43
4-6 · #313
41
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.1
Projected
35–37
✗ WEB lost
Half finalConference
7-2 · #86
26
Nevada
8-3 · #96
36
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.5
Projected
34–32
✗ BOIS lost
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
6-3 · #75
27
10-0 · #5 AP #1
28
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.2
Projected
32–41
✓ ARIZ won
StatusMatchupSpreadTotalModel lineSpread edgeModel totalTotal edgeWin probModel
Half final
5-6 · #204
36
10-1 · #10
39
— — MSU -10.7 — 72.8 — 88% MSU ›
Half final
3-5 · #273
20
9-2 · #14
42
— — LOU -16.7 — 76.8 — 97% LOU ›
Half final
5-6 · #291
34
7-4 · #83
57
— — KSU -11.5 — 81.4 — 89% KSU ›
Half final
7-3 · #9
32
7-4 · #19
25
— — SJU -2.1 — 74.4 — 59% SJU ›
Half final
4-3 · #160
29
9-3 · #91
33
— — DAY -6.2 — 68.0 — 75% DAY ›
Half final
5-6 · #325
28
5-5 · #265
40
— — YSU -3.8 — 69.1 — 66% YSU ›
Half final
1-10 · #362
29
8-3 · #38
52
— — IU -20.0 — 71.3 — 99% IU ›
Half final
4-6 · #332
47
9-2 · #142
42
— — SBU -10.1 — 71.1 — 86% SBU ›
Half final
8-2 · #237
41
5-5 · #187
28
— — WMU -0.3 — 71.7 — 51% WMU ›
Half final
7-4 · #168
37
— — RMU -7.5 — 69.9 — 79% RMU ›
Half final
1-10 · #208
31
6-5 · #259
28
— — APP -5.6 — 64.1 — 73% APP ›
Half final
8-2 · #87
24
8-1 · #58
45
— — USU -4.4 — 70.3 — 68% USU ›
Half final
5-5 · #197
38
9-1 · #120
27
— — UNCW -8.7 — 67.2 — 83% UNCW ›
Half final
4-7 · #218
36
0-9 · #357
36
— — LONG -1.9 — 70.9 — 58% LONG ›
Half final
2-9 · #310
43
7-4 · #94
49
— — GT -9.5 — 67.2 — 85% GT ›
Half final
8-4 · #233
36
6-5 · #186
40
— — UVM -2.4 — 72.7 — 60% UVM ›
Half final
1-9 · #272
18
2-8 · #331
42
— — MERC -4.6 — 64.5 — 69% MERC ›
Half final
6-4 · #232
43
10-2 · #68
35
— — VT -8.0 — 76.1 — 81% VT ›
Half final
9-0 · #125
40
2-8 · #181
36
— — M-OH -4.6 — 69.2 — 69% M-OH ›
Half final
7-2 · #151
35
8-3 · #209
24
— — MASS -0.7 — 78.3 — 53% MASS ›
Half final
3-7 · #317
24
4-6 · #136
41
— — HARV -5.3 — 64.6 — 72% HARV ›
Half final
7-4 · #231
32
5-5 · #147
36
— — TROY -2.7 — 75.8 — 62% TROY ›
Half final
5-6 · #283
34
3-8 · #234
29
— — ODU -3.6 — 68.8 — 65% ODU ›
Half final
3-7 · #263
40
6-2 · #219
40
— — UNCO -5.8 — 78.1 — 74% UNCO ›
Half final
2-7 · #270
44
2-7 · #334
27
— — NIU -0.1 — 70.4 — 50% NIU ›
Half final
1-11 · #221
39
1-9 · #358
25
— — UL -0.7 — 67.0 — 53% UL ›
Half final
10-1 · #44
34
8-2 · #33
31
— — UNC -0.7 — 74.4 — 53% UNC ›
Half final
8-3 · #228
39
5-6 · #103
25
— — TXST -0.1 — 65.9 — 50% TXST ›
Half final
4-6 · #76
30
6-5 · #53
34
— — MSST -1.6 — 73.3 — 57% MSST ›
Half final
1-6 · #198
31
6-4 · #173
34
— — ETSU -6.5 — 63.9 — 76% ETSU ›
Half final
6-4 · #80
45
8-2 · #122
26
— — WYO -0.9 — 68.9 — 54% WYO ›
Half final
7-4 · #59
23
8-3 · #72
29
— — NU -0.3 — 75.5 — 51% NU ›
Half final
4-5 · #229
31
7-4 · #63
41
— — SYR -8.9 — 67.7 — 84% SYR ›
Half final
6-3 · #200
42
4-6 · #128
29
— — BGSU -0.3 — 72.4 — 51% BGSU ›
Half final
5-4 · #341
32
3-6 · #282
31
— — TNTC -1.5 — 68.4 — 56% TNTC ›
Half final
7-4 · #171
39
5-5 · #224
32
— — ARST -1.3 — 74.4 — 56% ARST ›
Half final
2-7 · #306
44
4-4 · #245
37
— — TNST -1.0 — 72.2 — 55% TNST ›
Half final
2-7 · #350
26
— — USI -0.1 — 68.5 — 51% USI ›
Half final
4-6 · #266
49
9-1 · #39
49
— — UCF -10.1 — 77.3 — 86% UCF ›
Half final
3-9 · #113
40
8-3 · #106
40
— — SCU -8.7 — 71.2 — 83% SCU ›
Half final
5-4 · #242
39
3-8 · #139
41
— — WSU -3.6 — 71.3 — 65% WSU ›
Half final
6-5 · #324
46
3-4 · #178
44
— — FIU -3.1 — 73.8 — 63% FIU ›
Half final
6-5 · #158
39
7-5 · #296
37
— — GASO -0.9 — 73.9 — 54% GASO ›
Half final
10-1 · #2
49
9-2 · #18
41
— — HOU -3.4 — 68.5 — 65% HOU ›
Half final
6-5 · #50
19
9-1 · #20
24
— — UVA -5.6 — 71.3 — 73% UVA ›
Half final
0-9 · #339
32
8-2 · #104
42
— — RICH -12.1 — 69.9 — 91% RICH ›
Half final
3-9 · #299
21
9-2 · #43
43
— — IOWA -16.0 — 65.4 — 96% IOWA ›
Half final
8-3 · #21
32
10-1 · #23
46
— — PUR -3.5 — 75.3 — 65% PUR ›
Half final
5-5 · #174
41
4-6 · #98
39
— — UNLV -4.1 — 74.2 — 67% UNLV ›
Half final
2-7 · #279
43
3-5 · #293
32
— — LAM -1.5 — 66.6 — 56% LAM ›
Half final
1-9 · #254
34
7-4 · #73
50
— — UTAH -7.8 — 76.3 — 80% UTAH ›
Half final
3-4 · #274
23
7-4 · #130
24
— — TULN -2.0 — 69.4 — 59% TULN ›
Half final
4-6 · #281
38
7-4 · #212
41
— — STMN -5.5 — 70.4 — 72% STMN ›
Half final
1-6 · #196
34
9-3 · #203
38
— — CBU -7.8 — 69.3 — 80% CBU ›
Half final
9-2 · #85
33
10-1 · #65
35
— — COLO -1.8 — 75.0 — 58% COLO ›
Half final
5-4 · #137
33
5-6 · #62
29
— — RUTG -6.7 — 70.3 — 77% RUTG ›
Half final
8-3 · #12
36
11-0 · #3
46
— — DUKE -4.5 — 70.5 — 69% DUKE ›
Half final
8-4 · #49
35
8-3 · #64
40
— — GTWN -1.8 — 72.0 — 58% GTWN ›
Half final
5-7 · #42
32
6-5 · #37
46
— — CREI -4.7 — 70.5 — 70% CREI ›
Half final
4-6 · #143
28
8-2 · #82
41
— — UNM -7.5 — 70.3 — 79% UNM ›
Half final
4-6 · #177
29
2-8 · #172
36
— — RICE -0.8 — 67.7 — 54% RICE ›
Half final
3-6 · #268
43
4-6 · #313
41
— — WEB -2.8 — 72.1 — 62% WEB ›
Half final
7-2 · #86
26
8-3 · #96
36
— — BOIS -1.8 — 66.5 — 58% BOIS ›
Half final
6-3 · #75
27
10-0 · #5
28
— — ARIZ -9.6 — 73.2 — 85% ARIZ ›
The model’s 1st half is fitted from its full-game numbers and past halves; ESPN posts no 1st-half lines for college games. The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record