No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.8
Projected
31–42
✓ MSU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.8
Projected
30–47
✓ LOU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 81.4
Projected
35–46
✓ KSU won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.4
Projected
38–36
✓ SJU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.0
Projected
31–37
✓ DAY won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.1
Projected
33–36
✓ YSU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.3
Projected
26–46
✓ IU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.1
Projected
31–41
✗ SBU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.7
Projected
36–36
✗ WMU lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.9
Projected
39–31
✓ RMU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.1
Projected
29–35
✗ APP lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.3
Projected
33–37
✓ USU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.2
Projected
29–38
✗ UNCW lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.9
Projected
36–35
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.2
Projected
29–38
✓ GT won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.7
Projected
35–38
✓ UVM won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.5
Projected
30–35
✓ MERC won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.1
Projected
34–42
✗ VT lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.2
Projected
37–32
✓ M-OH won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 78.3
Projected
39–40
✗ MASS lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.6
Projected
30–35
✓ HARV won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.8
Projected
37–39
✓ TROY won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.8
Projected
33–36
✗ ODU lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 78.1
Projected
36–42
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.4
Projected
35–35
✓ CMU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.0
Projected
34–33
✓ UL won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.4
Projected
38–37
✓ UNC won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.9
Projected
33–33
✗ TXST lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.3
Projected
36–38
✓ MSST won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.9
Projected
29–35
✓ ETSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.9
Projected
34–35
✗ WYO lost
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.5
Projected
38–38
✗ NU lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.7
Projected
29–38
✓ SYR won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.4
Projected
36–36
✓ BGSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.4
Projected
33–35
✗ TNTC lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.4
Projected
38–37
✓ ARST won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.2
Projected
36–37
✗ TNST lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.5
Projected
34–34
✓ USI won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.3
Projected
34–44
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.2
Projected
31–40
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.3
Projected
34–37
✓ WSU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.8
Projected
35–38
✗ FIU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.9
Projected
37–37
✗ GASO lost
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.5
Projected
36–33
✓ HOU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.3
Projected
33–39
✓ UVA won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.9
Projected
29–41
✓ RICH won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.4
Projected
25–41
✓ IOWA won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.3
Projected
36–39
✓ PUR won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.2
Projected
35–39
✗ UNLV lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.6
Projected
33–34
✗ LAM lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.3
Projected
34–42
✓ UTAH won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.4
Projected
34–36
✓ TULN won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.4
Projected
32–38
✓ STMN won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.3
Projected
31–39
✓ CBU won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.0
Projected
37–38
✓ COLO won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.3
Projected
32–39
✗ RUTG lost
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.5
Projected
33–38
✓ DUKE won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.0
Projected
35–37
✓ GTWN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.5
Projected
33–38
✓ CREI won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.3
Projected
31–39
✓ UNM won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.7
Projected
34–33
✗ RICE lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.1
Projected
35–37
✗ WEB lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.5
Projected
34–32
✗ BOIS lost
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.2
Projected
32–41
✓ ARIZ won
| Status | Matchup | Spread | Total | Model line | Spread edge | Model total | Total edge | Win prob | Model | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Half final | 5-6 · #204 10-1 · #10 |
— | — | MSU -10.7 | — | 72.8 | — | 88% MSU | › | |
| Half final | 3-5 · #273 9-2 · #14 |
— | — | LOU -16.7 | — | 76.8 | — | 97% LOU | › | |
| Half final | 5-6 · #291 7-4 · #83 |
— | — | KSU -11.5 | — | 81.4 | — | 89% KSU | › | |
| Half final | 7-3 · #9 7-4 · #19 |
— | — | SJU -2.1 | — | 74.4 | — | 59% SJU | › | |
| Half final | 4-3 · #160 9-3 · #91 |
— | — | DAY -6.2 | — | 68.0 | — | 75% DAY | › | |
| Half final | 5-6 · #325 5-5 · #265 |
— | — | YSU -3.8 | — | 69.1 | — | 66% YSU | › | |
| Half final | 1-10 · #362 8-3 · #38 |
— | — | IU -20.0 | — | 71.3 | — | 99% IU | › | |
| Half final | 4-6 · #332 9-2 · #142 |
— | — | SBU -10.1 | — | 71.1 | — | 86% SBU | › | |
| Half final | 8-2 · #237 5-5 · #187 |
— | — | WMU -0.3 | — | 71.7 | — | 51% WMU | › | |
| Half final | 7-4 · #168 0-10 · #88 |
— | — | RMU -7.5 | — | 69.9 | — | 79% RMU | › | |
| Half final | 1-10 · #208 6-5 · #259 |
— | — | APP -5.6 | — | 64.1 | — | 73% APP | › | |
| Half final | 8-2 · #87 8-1 · #58 |
— | — | USU -4.4 | — | 70.3 | — | 68% USU | › | |
| Half final | 5-5 · #197 9-1 · #120 |
— | — | UNCW -8.7 | — | 67.2 | — | 83% UNCW | › | |
| Half final | 4-7 · #218 0-9 · #357 |
— | — | LONG -1.9 | — | 70.9 | — | 58% LONG | › | |
| Half final | 2-9 · #310 7-4 · #94 |
— | — | GT -9.5 | — | 67.2 | — | 85% GT | › | |
| Half final | 8-4 · #233 6-5 · #186 |
— | — | UVM -2.4 | — | 72.7 | — | 60% UVM | › | |
| Half final | 1-9 · #272 2-8 · #331 |
— | — | MERC -4.6 | — | 64.5 | — | 69% MERC | › | |
| Half final | 6-4 · #232 10-2 · #68 |
— | — | VT -8.0 | — | 76.1 | — | 81% VT | › | |
| Half final | 9-0 · #125 2-8 · #181 |
— | — | M-OH -4.6 | — | 69.2 | — | 69% M-OH | › | |
| Half final | 7-2 · #151 8-3 · #209 |
— | — | MASS -0.7 | — | 78.3 | — | 53% MASS | › | |
| Half final | 3-7 · #317 4-6 · #136 |
— | — | HARV -5.3 | — | 64.6 | — | 72% HARV | › | |
| Half final | 7-4 · #231 5-5 · #147 |
— | — | TROY -2.7 | — | 75.8 | — | 62% TROY | › | |
| Half final | 5-6 · #283 3-8 · #234 |
— | — | ODU -3.6 | — | 68.8 | — | 65% ODU | › | |
| Half final | 3-7 · #263 6-2 · #219 |
— | — | UNCO -5.8 | — | 78.1 | — | 74% UNCO | › | |
| Half final | 2-7 · #270 2-7 · #334 |
— | — | NIU -0.1 | — | 70.4 | — | 50% NIU | › | |
| Half final | 1-11 · #221 1-9 · #358 |
— | — | UL -0.7 | — | 67.0 | — | 53% UL | › | |
| Half final | 10-1 · #44 8-2 · #33 |
— | — | UNC -0.7 | — | 74.4 | — | 53% UNC | › | |
| Half final | 8-3 · #228 5-6 · #103 |
— | — | TXST -0.1 | — | 65.9 | — | 50% TXST | › | |
| Half final | 4-6 · #76 6-5 · #53 |
— | — | MSST -1.6 | — | 73.3 | — | 57% MSST | › | |
| Half final | 1-6 · #198 6-4 · #173 |
— | — | ETSU -6.5 | — | 63.9 | — | 76% ETSU | › | |
| Half final | 6-4 · #80 8-2 · #122 |
— | — | WYO -0.9 | — | 68.9 | — | 54% WYO | › | |
| Half final | 7-4 · #59 8-3 · #72 |
— | — | NU -0.3 | — | 75.5 | — | 51% NU | › | |
| Half final | 4-5 · #229 7-4 · #63 |
— | — | SYR -8.9 | — | 67.7 | — | 84% SYR | › | |
| Half final | 6-3 · #200 4-6 · #128 |
— | — | BGSU -0.3 | — | 72.4 | — | 51% BGSU | › | |
| Half final | 5-4 · #341 3-6 · #282 |
— | — | TNTC -1.5 | — | 68.4 | — | 56% TNTC | › | |
| Half final | 7-4 · #171 5-5 · #224 |
— | — | ARST -1.3 | — | 74.4 | — | 56% ARST | › | |
| Half final | 2-7 · #306 4-4 · #245 |
— | — | TNST -1.0 | — | 72.2 | — | 55% TNST | › | |
| Half final | 2-7 · #350 1-8 · #304 |
— | — | USI -0.1 | — | 68.5 | — | 51% USI | › | |
| Half final | 4-6 · #266 9-1 · #39 |
— | — | UCF -10.1 | — | 77.3 | — | 86% UCF | › | |
| Half final | 3-9 · #113 8-3 · #106 |
— | — | SCU -8.7 | — | 71.2 | — | 83% SCU | › | |
| Half final | 5-4 · #242 3-8 · #139 |
— | — | WSU -3.6 | — | 71.3 | — | 65% WSU | › | |
| Half final | 6-5 · #324 3-4 · #178 |
— | — | FIU -3.1 | — | 73.8 | — | 63% FIU | › | |
| Half final | 6-5 · #158 7-5 · #296 |
— | — | GASO -0.9 | — | 73.9 | — | 54% GASO | › | |
| Half final | 10-1 · #2 9-2 · #18 |
— | — | HOU -3.4 | — | 68.5 | — | 65% HOU | › | |
| Half final | 6-5 · #50 9-1 · #20 |
— | — | UVA -5.6 | — | 71.3 | — | 73% UVA | › | |
| Half final | 0-9 · #339 8-2 · #104 |
— | — | RICH -12.1 | — | 69.9 | — | 91% RICH | › | |
| Half final | 3-9 · #299 9-2 · #43 |
— | — | IOWA -16.0 | — | 65.4 | — | 96% IOWA | › | |
| Half final | 8-3 · #21 10-1 · #23 |
— | — | PUR -3.5 | — | 75.3 | — | 65% PUR | › | |
| Half final | 5-5 · #174 4-6 · #98 |
— | — | UNLV -4.1 | — | 74.2 | — | 67% UNLV | › | |
| Half final | 2-7 · #279 3-5 · #293 |
— | — | LAM -1.5 | — | 66.6 | — | 56% LAM | › | |
| Half final | 1-9 · #254 7-4 · #73 |
— | — | UTAH -7.8 | — | 76.3 | — | 80% UTAH | › | |
| Half final | 3-4 · #274 7-4 · #130 |
— | — | TULN -2.0 | — | 69.4 | — | 59% TULN | › | |
| Half final | 4-6 · #281 7-4 · #212 |
— | — | STMN -5.5 | — | 70.4 | — | 72% STMN | › | |
| Half final | 1-6 · #196 9-3 · #203 |
— | — | CBU -7.8 | — | 69.3 | — | 80% CBU | › | |
| Half final | 9-2 · #85 10-1 · #65 |
— | — | COLO -1.8 | — | 75.0 | — | 58% COLO | › | |
| Half final | 5-4 · #137 5-6 · #62 |
— | — | RUTG -6.7 | — | 70.3 | — | 77% RUTG | › | |
| Half final | 8-3 · #12 11-0 · #3 |
— | — | DUKE -4.5 | — | 70.5 | — | 69% DUKE | › | |
| Half final | 8-4 · #49 8-3 · #64 |
— | — | GTWN -1.8 | — | 72.0 | — | 58% GTWN | › | |
| Half final | 5-7 · #42 6-5 · #37 |
— | — | CREI -4.7 | — | 70.5 | — | 70% CREI | › | |
| Half final | 4-6 · #143 8-2 · #82 |
— | — | UNM -7.5 | — | 70.3 | — | 79% UNM | › | |
| Half final | 4-6 · #177 2-8 · #172 |
— | — | RICE -0.8 | — | 67.7 | — | 54% RICE | › | |
| Half final | 3-6 · #268 4-6 · #313 |
— | — | WEB -2.8 | — | 72.1 | — | 62% WEB | › | |
| Half final | 7-2 · #86 8-3 · #96 |
— | — | BOIS -1.8 | — | 66.5 | — | 58% BOIS | › | |
| Half final | 6-3 · #75 10-0 · #5 |
— | — | ARIZ -9.6 | — | 73.2 | — | 85% ARIZ | › |
The model’s 1st half is fitted from its full-game numbers and past halves; ESPN posts no 1st-half lines for college games. The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record