No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.1
Projected
34–31
✗ UNI lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.5
Projected
31–33
✓ UNH won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.0
Projected
23–49
✓ FLA won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.3
Projected
35–35
✓ CREI won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.5
Projected
40–35
✓ VAN won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.0
Projected
37–34
✗ UCSB lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.4
Projected
33–35
✗ JXST lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.8
Projected
32–38
✗ STBK lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.9
Projected
29–40
✗ COFC lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.0
Projected
33–43
✓ UCF won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.6
Projected
35–33
✗ JAX lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.6
Projected
36–36
✓ UTC won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.0
Projected
31–33
✓ WAG won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.9
Projected
33–33
✓ UVM won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.8
Projected
31–32
✓ ECU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.3
Projected
35–35
✓ QUIN won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.8
Projected
28–39
✓ CIN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.8
Projected
33–34
✗ RMU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.0
Projected
38–39
✗ NKU lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.4
Projected
31–45
✗ WAKE lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.3
Projected
25–39
✓ SYR won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.3
Projected
26–40
✓ PITT won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.7
Projected
29–46
✓ NCSU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.3
Projected
40–37
✓ RICH won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.4
Projected
30–37
✓ WICH won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.1
Projected
32–43
✓ UAB won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.2
Projected
33–34
✓ TULN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.4
Projected
38–40
✓ MTSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.6
Projected
32–34
✓ NICH won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.7
Projected
38–32
✗ USA lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 83.7
Projected
37–47
✓ ALA won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.3
Projected
27–39
✓ MISS won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.6
Projected
32–39
✓ UVU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.6
Projected
31–43
✓ SLU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.8
Projected
35–36
✓ ODU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.3
Projected
35–38
✗ MARQ lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.0
Projected
37–35
✓ ARST won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.0
Projected
28–46
✓ GONZ won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.8
Projected
30–44
✓ USC won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.4
Projected
34–33
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.6
Projected
31–36
✗ SCU lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.2
Projected
31–41
✓ COLO won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.7
Projected
31–34
✗ SFA lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.0
Projected
36–37
✗ ORST lost
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.9
Projected
40–35
✓ WSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.9
Projected
26–40
✓ SDSU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.0
Projected
31–37
✓ STAN won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.0
Projected
29–38
✓ SF won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.7
Projected
32–37
✓ UCLA won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.7
Projected
31–42
✓ ORE won
| Status | Matchup | Spread | Total | Model line | Spread edge | Model total | Total edge | Win prob | Model | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Half final |  7-2 · #131  3-6 · #110 |
— | — | UNI -3.1 | — | 64.1 | — | 63% UNI | › | |
| Half final |  1-8 · #349  1-7 · #286 |
— | — | UNH -1.8 | — | 64.5 | — | 58% UNH | › | |
| Half final |  0-9 · #88  6-4 · #1 |
— | — | FLA -26.4 | — | 72.0 | — | 100% FLA | › | |
| Half final |  5-5 · #37  8-3 · #49 |
— | — | CREI -0.5 | — | 70.3 | — | 52% CREI | › | |
| Half final |  10-0 · #22  4-5 · #76 |
— | — | VAN -4.9 | — | 75.5 | — | 70% VAN | › | |
| Half final |  6-3 · #134  3-7 · #226 |
— | — | UCSB -2.7 | — | 71.0 | — | 61% UCSB | › | |
| Half final |  1-8 · #294  1-5 · #198 |
— | — | JXST -2.3 | — | 68.4 | — | 60% JXST | › | |
| Half final |  0-9 · #301  6-3 · #191 |
— | — | STBK -5.5 | — | 69.8 | — | 73% STBK | › | |
| Half final |  0-8 · #339  4-6 · #117 |
— | — | COFC -10.1 | — | 68.9 | — | 86% COFC | › | |
| Half final |  5-3 · #242  8-1 · #39 |
— | — | UCF -9.5 | — | 76.0 | — | 85% UCF | › | |
| Half final |  3-6 · #223  0-5 · #327 |
— | — | JAX -2.1 | — | 67.6 | — | 59% JAX | › | |
| Half final |  2-6 · #227  2-6 · #295 |
— | — | UTC -0.5 | — | 71.6 | — | 52% UTC | › | |
| Half final |  2-11 · #364  1-6 · #354 |
— | — | WAG -2.3 | — | 64.0 | — | 60% WAG | › | |
| Half final |  9-2 · #260  5-5 · #186 |
— | — | UVM -0.7 | — | 65.9 | — | 53% UVM | › | |
| Half final |  4-6 · #183  3-7 · #145 |
— | — | ECU -1.0 | — | 63.8 | — | 55% ECU | › | |
| Half final |  7-3 · #241  4-6 · #155 |
— | — | QUIN -0.1 | — | 70.3 | — | 50% MONM | › | |
| Half final |  2-7 · #302  6-4 · #30 |
— | — | CIN -11.1 | — | 67.8 | — | 89% CIN | › | |
| Half final |  5-4 · #265  6-4 · #168 |
— | — | RMU -1.1 | — | 67.8 | — | 55% RMU | › | |
| Half final |  4-6 · #204  6-3 · #230 |
— | — | NKU -0.3 | — | 77.0 | — | 51% NKU | › | |
| Half final |  4-6 · #218  8-3 · #89 |
— | — | WAKE -14.3 | — | 75.4 | — | 94% WAKE | › | |
| Half final |  2-7 · #331  6-4 · #63 |
— | — | SYR -14.0 | — | 63.3 | — | 94% SYR | › | |
| Half final |  1-8 · #272  5-6 · #74 |
— | — | PITT -13.7 | — | 66.3 | — | 93% PITT | › | |
| Half final |  0-7 · #322  7-4 · #48 |
— | — | NCSU -17.1 | — | 74.7 | — | 97% NCSU | › | |
| Half final |  8-1 · #104  5-4 · #232 |
— | — | RICH -2.8 | — | 76.3 | — | 62% RICH | › | |
| Half final |  6-4 · #248  5-5 · #77 |
— | — | WICH -7.5 | — | 67.4 | — | 79% WICH | › | |
| Half final |  1-8 · #315  6-4 · #102 |
— | — | UAB -11.1 | — | 75.1 | — | 89% UAB | › | |
| Half final |  4-3 · #244  6-4 · #130 |
— | — | TULN -1.1 | — | 66.2 | — | 55% TULN | › | |
| Half final |  5-2 · #148  3-4 · #154 |
— | — | MTSU -2.1 | — | 77.4 | — | 59% MTSU | › | |
| Half final |  3-6 · #300  1-7 · #285 |
— | — | NICH -1.9 | — | 66.6 | — | 58% NICH | › | |
| Half final |  7-3 · #228  1-8 · #358 |
— | — | USA -6.1 | — | 69.7 | — | 75% USA | › | |
| Half final |  6-4 · #84  7-3 · #15 |
— | — | ALA -9.8 | — | 83.7 | — | 86% ALA | › | |
| Half final |  4-4 · #328  6-4 · #46 |
— | — | MISS -11.7 | — | 65.3 | — | 90% MISS | › | |
| Half final |  4-5 · #313  6-3 · #150 |
— | — | UVU -7.2 | — | 70.6 | — | 78% UVU | › | |
| Half final |  2-7 · #202  9-1 · #69 |
— | — | SLU -12.5 | — | 73.6 | — | 91% SLU | › | |
| Half final |  6-4 · #158  2-8 · #234 |
— | — | ODU -1.0 | — | 70.8 | — | 54% ODU | › | |
| Half final |  7-3 · #64  5-6 · #42 |
— | — | MARQ -3.4 | — | 72.3 | — | 64% MARQ | › | |
| Half final |  6-4 · #171  5-5 · #103 |
— | — | ARST -2.3 | — | 72.0 | — | 60% ARST | › | |
| Half final |  3-5 · #243  10-1 · #17 |
— | — | GONZ -18.4 | — | 74.0 | — | 98% GONZ | › | |
| Half final |  2-6 · #192  10-1 · #36 |
— | — | USC -13.4 | — | 73.8 | — | 93% USC | › | |
| Half final |  6-2 · #119  4-4 · #182 |
— | — | SEA -1.1 | — | 66.4 | — | 55% SEA | › | |
| Half final |  7-3 · #112  7-3 · #106 |
— | — | SCU -5.2 | — | 66.6 | — | 72% SCU | › | |
| Half final |  3-3 · #274  9-1 · #65 |
— | — | COLO -9.6 | — | 72.2 | — | 85% COLO | › | |
| Half final |  1-5 · #238  6-2 · #193 |
— | — | SFA -3.2 | — | 64.7 | — | 64% SFA | › | |
| Half final |  4-3 · #189  6-5 · #99 |
— | — | ORST -1.0 | — | 72.0 | — | 54% ORST | › | |
| Half final |  2-8 · #139  1-8 · #254 |
— | — | WSU -4.1 | — | 74.9 | — | 67% WSU | › | |
| Half final |  3-8 · #220  5-3 · #75 |
— | — | SDSU -13.3 | — | 65.9 | — | 93% SDSU | › | |
| Half final |  5-3 · #257  8-2 · #85 |
— | — | STAN -6.8 | — | 68.0 | — | 77% STAN | › | |
| Half final |  3-8 · #113  5-5 · #161 |
— | — | SF -8.5 | — | 67.0 | — | 82% SF | › | |
| Half final |  9-2 · #60  7-3 · #26 |
— | — | UCLA -5.8 | — | 68.7 | — | 74% UCLA | › | |
| Half final |  5-4 · #169  5-5 · #57 |
— | — | ORE -10.6 | — | 72.7 | — | 88% ORE | › |
The model’s 1st half is fitted from its full-game numbers and past halves; ESPN posts no 1st-half lines for college games. The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record