Sort by

Sort

Sort by
No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
Half finalNon-conference
2-10 · #364
29
9-2 · #68
38
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.2
Projected
26–41
✓ VT won
Half finalNon-conference
24
Temple
4-5 · #111
47
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.7
Projected
30–42
✓ TEM won
Half finalNon-conference
1-7 · #361
28
10-0 · #13 AP #4
44
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.5
Projected
22–47
✓ ISU won
Half finalNon-conference
0-6 · #322
25
5-5 · #70
45
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.7
Projected
28–40
✓ MINN won
Half finalNon-conference
8-1 · #237
47
2-7 · #145
28
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.2
Projected
35–35
✗ ECU lost
Half finalNon-conference
2-6 · #202
25
9-2 · #54
39
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.7
Projected
31–42
✓ MIZ won
Half finalNon-conference
6-6 · #225
21
4-5 · #186
30
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.2
Projected
31–35
✓ UVM won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
7-2 · #90
33
4-5 · #259
34
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.8
Projected
39–31
✗ HPU lost
Half finalNon-conference
4-5 · #155
35
5-5 · #239
32
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.8
Projected
36–34
✓ MONM won
Half finalNon-conference
2-7 · #181
30
2-5 · #243
30
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.6
Projected
31–36
 
Half finalNon-conference
4-4 · #207
36
3-5 · #235
39
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.7
Projected
37–38
✓ MILW won
Half finalNon-conference
1-11 · #352
41
2-7 · #246
43
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.1
Projected
31–41
✓ RAD won
Half finalNon-conference
Troy
4-5 · #147
35
UAB
6-3 · #102
39
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.8
Projected
36–41
✓ UAB won
Half finalNon-conference
5-4 · #187
16
Iowa
8-2 · #43
52
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.4
Projected
27–42
✓ IOWA won
Half finalNon-conference
FGCU
4-5 · #266
25
7-2 · #82
28
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.5
Projected
34–42
✓ UNM won
Half finalNon-conference
3-6 · #141
33
3-6 · #117
39
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.3
Projected
32–35
✓ COFC won
Half finalNon-conference
7-1 · #151
36
4-4 · #169
39
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 78.0
Projected
41–37
✗ KENT lost
Half finalNon-conference
39
7-3 · #89
57
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 78.0
Projected
34–44
✓ WAKE won
Half finalConference
3-6 · #277
33
3-6 · #249
40
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.0
Projected
35–39
✓ PFW won
Half finalNon-conference
0-9 · #362
35
3-7 · #113
28
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.0
Projected
31–38
✗ LUC lost
Half finalNon-conference
6-3 · #112
30
7-2 · #228
26
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 62.7
Projected
32–31
✓ UNT won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
8-1 · #97
32
6-2 · #86
37
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.1
Projected
33–32
✗ SMC lost
Half finalNon-conference
3-5 · #223
26
7-3 · #28
51
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.1
Projected
28–43
✓ TA&M won
Half finalNon-conference
2-7 · #139
26
USC
9-1 · #36
33
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.6
Projected
35–43
✓ USC won
StatusMatchupSpreadTotalModel lineSpread edgeModel totalTotal edgeWin probModel
Half final
2-10 · #364
29
9-2 · #68
38
— — VT -14.5 — 67.2 — 94% VT ›
Half final
4-5 · #111
47
— — TEM -12.6 — 71.7 — 91% TEM ›
Half final
1-7 · #361
28
10-0 · #13
44
— — ISU -24.5 — 68.5 — 100% ISU ›
Half final
0-6 · #322
25
5-5 · #70
45
— — MINN -11.9 — 68.7 — 90% MINN ›
Half final
8-1 · #237
47
2-7 · #145
28
— — ECU -0.4 — 70.2 — 52% ECU ›
Half final
2-6 · #202
25
9-2 · #54
39
— — MIZ -11.7 — 72.7 — 90% MIZ ›
Half final
6-6 · #225
21
4-5 · #186
30
— — UVM -4.1 — 66.2 — 67% UVM ›
Half final
7-2 · #90
33
4-5 · #259
34
— — HPU -7.6 — 69.8 — 80% HPU ›
Half final
4-5 · #155
35
5-5 · #239
32
— — MONM -1.9 — 69.8 — 58% MONM ›
Half final
2-7 · #181
30
2-5 · #243
30
— — CAM -5.0 — 67.6 — 71% CAM ›
Half final
4-4 · #207
36
3-5 · #235
39
— — MILW -0.9 — 74.7 — 54% MILW ›
Half final
1-11 · #352
41
2-7 · #246
43
— — RAD -9.9 — 71.1 — 86% RAD ›
Half final
4-5 · #147
35
6-3 · #102
39
— — UAB -4.3 — 76.8 — 68% UAB ›
Half final
5-4 · #187
16
8-2 · #43
52
— — IOWA -14.7 — 69.4 — 95% IOWA ›
Half final
4-5 · #266
25
7-2 · #82
28
— — UNM -8.2 — 75.5 — 81% UNM ›
Half final
3-6 · #141
33
3-6 · #117
39
— — COFC -2.6 — 67.3 — 61% COFC ›
Half final
7-1 · #151
36
4-4 · #169
39
— — KENT -3.5 — 78.0 — 65% KENT ›
Half final
7-3 · #89
57
— — WAKE -10.8 — 78.0 — 88% WAKE ›
Half final
3-6 · #277
33
3-6 · #249
40
— — PFW -4.1 — 74.0 — 67% PFW ›
Half final
0-9 · #362
35
3-7 · #113
28
— — LUC -6.9 — 69.0 — 78% LUC ›
Half final
6-3 · #112
30
7-2 · #228
26
— — UNT -0.2 — 62.7 — 51% UNT ›
Half final
8-1 · #97
32
6-2 · #86
37
— — SMC -1.0 — 64.1 — 54% SMC ›
Half final
3-5 · #223
26
7-3 · #28
51
— — TA&M -14.4 — 71.1 — 94% TA&M ›
Half final
2-7 · #139
26
9-1 · #36
33
— — USC -8.5 — 77.6 — 82% USC ›
The model’s 1st half is fitted from its full-game numbers and past halves; ESPN posts no 1st-half lines for college games. The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record