No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.2
Projected
26–41
✓ VT won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.7
Projected
30–42
✓ TEM won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.5
Projected
22–47
✓ ISU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.7
Projected
28–40
✓ MINN won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.2
Projected
35–35
✗ ECU lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.7
Projected
31–42
✓ MIZ won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.2
Projected
31–35
✓ UVM won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.8
Projected
39–31
✗ HPU lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.8
Projected
36–34
✓ MONM won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.6
Projected
31–36
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.7
Projected
37–38
✓ MILW won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.1
Projected
31–41
✓ RAD won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.8
Projected
36–41
✓ UAB won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.4
Projected
27–42
✓ IOWA won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.5
Projected
34–42
✓ UNM won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.3
Projected
32–35
✓ COFC won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 78.0
Projected
41–37
✗ KENT lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 78.0
Projected
34–44
✓ WAKE won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.0
Projected
35–39
✓ PFW won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.0
Projected
31–38
✗ LUC lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 62.7
Projected
32–31
✓ UNT won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.1
Projected
33–32
✗ SMC lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.1
Projected
28–43
✓ TA&M won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.6
Projected
35–43
✓ USC won
| Status | Matchup | Spread | Total | Model line | Spread edge | Model total | Total edge | Win prob | Model | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Half final | 2-10 · #364 9-2 · #68 |
— | — | VT -14.5 | — | 67.2 | — | 94% VT | › | |
| Half final | 0-8 · #88 4-5 · #111 |
— | — | TEM -12.6 | — | 71.7 | — | 91% TEM | › | |
| Half final | 1-7 · #361 10-0 · #13 |
— | — | ISU -24.5 | — | 68.5 | — | 100% ISU | › | |
| Half final | 0-6 · #322 5-5 · #70 |
— | — | MINN -11.9 | — | 68.7 | — | 90% MINN | › | |
| Half final | 8-1 · #237 2-7 · #145 |
— | — | ECU -0.4 | — | 70.2 | — | 52% ECU | › | |
| Half final | 2-6 · #202 9-2 · #54 |
— | — | MIZ -11.7 | — | 72.7 | — | 90% MIZ | › | |
| Half final | 6-6 · #225 4-5 · #186 |
— | — | UVM -4.1 | — | 66.2 | — | 67% UVM | › | |
| Half final | 7-2 · #90 4-5 · #259 |
— | — | HPU -7.6 | — | 69.8 | — | 80% HPU | › | |
| Half final | 4-5 · #155 5-5 · #239 |
— | — | MONM -1.9 | — | 69.8 | — | 58% MONM | › | |
| Half final | 2-7 · #181 2-5 · #243 |
— | — | CAM -5.0 | — | 67.6 | — | 71% CAM | › | |
| Half final | 4-4 · #207 3-5 · #235 |
— | — | MILW -0.9 | — | 74.7 | — | 54% MILW | › | |
| Half final | 1-11 · #352 2-7 · #246 |
— | — | RAD -9.9 | — | 71.1 | — | 86% RAD | › | |
| Half final | 4-5 · #147 6-3 · #102 |
— | — | UAB -4.3 | — | 76.8 | — | 68% UAB | › | |
| Half final | 5-4 · #187 8-2 · #43 |
— | — | IOWA -14.7 | — | 69.4 | — | 95% IOWA | › | |
| Half final | 4-5 · #266 7-2 · #82 |
— | — | UNM -8.2 | — | 75.5 | — | 81% UNM | › | |
| Half final | 3-6 · #141 3-6 · #117 |
— | — | COFC -2.6 | — | 67.3 | — | 61% COFC | › | |
| Half final | 7-1 · #151 4-4 · #169 |
— | — | KENT -3.5 | — | 78.0 | — | 65% KENT | › | |
| Half final | 4-5 · #175 7-3 · #89 |
— | — | WAKE -10.8 | — | 78.0 | — | 88% WAKE | › | |
| Half final | 3-6 · #277 3-6 · #249 |
— | — | PFW -4.1 | — | 74.0 | — | 67% PFW | › | |
| Half final | 0-9 · #362 3-7 · #113 |
— | — | LUC -6.9 | — | 69.0 | — | 78% LUC | › | |
| Half final | 6-3 · #112 7-2 · #228 |
— | — | UNT -0.2 | — | 62.7 | — | 51% UNT | › | |
| Half final | 8-1 · #97 6-2 · #86 |
— | — | SMC -1.0 | — | 64.1 | — | 54% SMC | › | |
| Half final | 3-5 · #223 7-3 · #28 |
— | — | TA&M -14.4 | — | 71.1 | — | 94% TA&M | › | |
| Half final | 2-7 · #139 9-1 · #36 |
— | — | USC -8.5 | — | 77.6 | — | 82% USC | › |
The model’s 1st half is fitted from its full-game numbers and past halves; ESPN posts no 1st-half lines for college games. The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record