No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.9
Projected
38–31
✗ MSU lost
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.4
Projected
37–36
✓ TTU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.7
Projected
29–47
✓ SJU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.6
Projected
31–41
✓ FAU won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.9
Projected
34–40
✓ FSU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.2
Projected
33–36
✗ WICH lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.3
Projected
32–37
✓ STBK won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.6
Projected
27–46
✓ MIA won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.3
Projected
30–39
✓ GMU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.1
Projected
34–41
✗ ELON lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.7
Projected
37–37
✗ RMU lost
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 79.1
Projected
39–40
✗ OKST lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.1
Projected
35–37
✗ DEL lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.7
Projected
31–42
✓ PUR won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.7
Projected
28–43
✓ UNC won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.2
Projected
36–35
✓ STMN won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.0
Projected
32–36
✗ UND lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.3
Projected
32–35
✗ DRKE lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.3
Projected
34–31
✗ JXST lost
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.1
Projected
35–38
✓ UVU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.6
Projected
27–42
✓ NU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.7
Projected
35–36
✓ DART won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.2
Projected
36–35
✓ SHU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.2
Projected
37–35
✓ NKU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 79.2
Projected
38–41
✗ BTLR lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.1
Projected
32–39
✓ FOR won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.6
Projected
34–40
✗ QUIN lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.3
Projected
28–36
✓ DAV won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.0
Projected
34–40
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.3
Projected
28–39
✓ ND won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 59.0
Projected
27–32
✗ ME lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 78.1
Projected
37–41
✓ SDAK won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.2
Projected
29–39
✓ GTWN won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.2
Projected
34–43
✓ FLA won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.8
Projected
24–43
✓ HOU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.3
Projected
40–37
✓ M-OH won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.7
Projected
37–34
✓ TLSA won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.8
Projected
36–32
✗ HAMP lost
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.0
Projected
30–39
✓ MISS won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.9
Projected
32–37
✗ LONG lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 60.1
Projected
27–34
✓ LT won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.3
Projected
38–37
✓ ARST won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.8
Projected
34–32
✗ UNCW lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.2
Projected
35–38
✗ CREI lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.9
Projected
30–42
✗ CLEM lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.0
Projected
33–42
✓ LOU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.8
Projected
34–40
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.7
Projected
33–39
✗ BEL lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.4
Projected
31–38
✓ ORE won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.9
Projected
35–36
✗ MRSH lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.8
Projected
38–40
✗ DEN lost
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 80.4
Projected
39–42
✗ AKR lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.4
Projected
31–43
✓ COLO won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.3
Projected
30–36
✓ SYR won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 60.0
Projected
31–29
✓ MRST won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.8
Projected
34–34
✓ MORG won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.0
Projected
35–31
✓ CCSU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.1
Projected
34–34
✗ LAS lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.3
Projected
30–36
✓ VILL won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.5
Projected
31–32
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.5
Projected
30–44
✓ AUB won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.4
Projected
33–35
✓ ORST won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.5
Projected
29–41
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.5
Projected
37–34
✗ SBU lost
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.6
Projected
33–37
✓ USU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.0
Projected
36–36
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.1
Projected
33–36
✓ USD won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.9
Projected
29–43
✓ WASH won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.6
Projected
33–37
✓ UNI won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.6
Projected
35–38
✗ RICH lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.8
Projected
35–35
✗ L-MD lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.6
Projected
28–47
✓ VAN won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.9
Projected
27–42
✓ SC won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.3
Projected
37–37
✓ GASO won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.3
Projected
37–37
✓ SCU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.2
Projected
36–33
✓ STAN won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.5
Projected
30–45
✓ DAY won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.0
Projected
36–38
✗ UK lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.6
Projected
44–30
✗ MICH lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.2
Projected
30–35
✓ HALL won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.3
Projected
28–38
✓ GCU won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.1
Projected
33–35
✗ OSU lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.4
Projected
33–39
✓ SLU won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 78.0
Projected
38–40
✓ LSU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.0
Projected
27–45
✓ BYU won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 82.0
Projected
41–41
✗ ARIZ lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.8
Projected
35–35
✗ CSUB lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.4
Projected
34–42
✓ UNLV won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.5
Projected
40–37
✗ MSST lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.8
Projected
34–39
✓ NEV won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.2
Projected
33–38
✓ GONZ won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.7
Projected
34–38
✓ UCSD won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.7
Projected
29–36
✗ HAW lost
| Status | Matchup | Spread | Total | Model line | Spread edge | Model total | Total edge | Win prob | Model | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Half final | 8-1 · #10 8-2 · #78 |
— | — | MSU -7.1 | — | 68.9 | — | 78% MSU | › | |
| Half final | 7-2 · #12 7-2 · #18 |
— | — | TTU -1.4 | — | 72.4 | — | 56% TTU | › | |
| Half final | 8-3 · #233 5-3 · #9 |
— | — | SJU -18.1 | — | 75.7 | — | 98% SJU | › | |
| Half final | 0-8 · #301 5-3 · #109 |
— | — | FAU -10.2 | — | 71.6 | — | 87% FAU | › | |
| Half final | 7-3 · #209 5-4 · #81 |
— | — | FSU -6.0 | — | 74.9 | — | 74% FSU | › | |
| Half final | 7-3 · #66 5-4 · #77 |
— | — | WICH -3.2 | — | 68.2 | — | 64% WICH | › | |
| Half final | 2-6 · #270 5-3 · #191 |
— | — | STBK -4.4 | — | 69.3 | — | 68% STBK | › | |
| Half final | 1-7 · #358 8-2 · #25 |
— | — | MIA -19.6 | — | 72.6 | — | 98% MIA | › | |
| Half final | 2-7 · #234 8-1 · #93 |
— | — | GMU -9.1 | — | 68.3 | — | 84% GMU | › | |
| Half final | 2-6 · #334 4-4 · #232 |
— | — | ELON -7.2 | — | 75.1 | — | 78% ELON | › | |
| Half final | 4-4 · #157 5-4 · #168 |
— | — | RMU -0.5 | — | 73.7 | — | 52% RMU | › | |
| Half final | 6-3 · #31 9-0 · #45 |
— | — | OKST -0.6 | — | 79.1 | — | 53% OKST | › | |
| Half final | 4-5 · #194 3-5 · #206 |
— | — | DEL -1.8 | — | 72.1 | — | 58% DEL | › | |
| Half final | 5-5 · #42 9-1 · #23 |
— | — | PUR -11.3 | — | 72.7 | — | 89% PUR | › | |
| Half final | 4-5 · #325 8-1 · #44 |
— | — | UNC -14.9 | — | 71.7 | — | 95% UNC | › | |
| Half final | 6-4 · #212 3-6 · #271 |
— | — | STMN -0.9 | — | 71.2 | — | 54% STMN | › | |
| Half final | 0-7 · #365 2-8 · #336 |
— | — | UND -4.8 | — | 68.0 | — | 70% UND | › | |
| Half final | 6-3 · #213 4-4 · #144 |
— | — | DRKE -2.8 | — | 67.3 | — | 62% DRKE | › | |
| Half final | 1-4 · #198 0-9 · #208 |
— | — | JXST -2.9 | — | 64.3 | — | 62% JXST | › | |
| Half final | 6-2 · #134 5-3 · #150 |
— | — | UVU -3.0 | — | 72.1 | — | 63% UVU | › | |
| Half final | 1-8 · #280 5-4 · #59 |
— | — | NU -14.9 | — | 69.6 | — | 95% NU | › | |
| Half final | 3-7 · #261 2-5 · #251 |
— | — | DART -1.2 | — | 70.7 | — | 55% DART | › | |
| Half final | 2-6 · #311 4-7 · #316 |
— | — | SHU -1.2 | — | 71.2 | — | 55% SHU | › | |
| Half final | 5-3 · #230 2-5 · #295 |
— | — | NKU -2.3 | — | 72.2 | — | 60% NKU | › | |
| Half final | 7-4 · #52 7-2 · #72 |
— | — | BTLR -2.4 | — | 79.2 | — | 61% BTLR | › | |
| Half final | 3-6 · #330 4-4 · #100 |
— | — | FOR -6.7 | — | 71.1 | — | 77% FOR | › | |
| Half final | 1-7 · #307 6-3 · #241 |
— | — | QUIN -6.4 | — | 73.6 | — | 76% QUIN | › | |
| Half final | 2-6 · #331 6-2 · #115 |
— | — | DAV -7.8 | — | 63.3 | — | 80% DAV | › | |
| Half final | 6-3 · #30 8-1 · #34 |
— | — | UGA -5.8 | — | 74.0 | — | 74% UGA | › | |
| Half final | 2-6 · #255 8-3 · #71 |
— | — | ND -10.6 | — | 66.3 | — | 88% ND | › | |
| Half final | 3-6 · #359 1-11 · #323 |
— | — | ME -5.5 | — | 59.0 | — | 73% ME | › | |
| Half final | 1-5 · #343 4-6 · #291 |
— | — | SDAK -4.3 | — | 78.1 | — | 68% SDAK | › | |
| Half final | 4-4 · #269 6-3 · #64 |
— | — | GTWN -10.1 | — | 67.2 | — | 86% GTWN | › | |
| Half final | 8-3 · #101 5-4 · #1 |
— | — | FLA -9.2 | — | 77.2 | — | 84% FLA | › | |
| Half final | 3-7 · #276 9-1 · #2 |
— | — | HOU -18.4 | — | 66.8 | — | 98% HOU | › | |
| Half final | 7-0 · #125 1-7 · #294 |
— | — | M-OH -2.7 | — | 76.3 | — | 62% M-OH | › | |
| Half final | 7-1 · #108 4-2 · #133 |
— | — | TLSA -2.4 | — | 70.7 | — | 60% TLSA | › | |
| Half final | 3-5 · #159 3-5 · #197 |
— | — | HAMP -3.5 | — | 67.8 | — | 65% HAMP | › | |
| Half final | 4-4 · #224 5-4 · #46 |
— | — | MISS -8.5 | — | 69.0 | — | 82% MISS | › | |
| Half final | 1-7 · #351 4-5 · #218 |
— | — | LONG -5.6 | — | 68.9 | — | 73% LONG | › | |
| Half final | 1-9 · #221 3-3 · #244 |
— | — | LT -7.0 | — | 60.1 | — | 78% LT | › | |
| Half final | 6-3 · #171 3-6 · #177 |
— | — | ARST -1.4 | — | 74.3 | — | 56% ARST | › | |
| Half final | 8-1 · #120 5-3 · #176 |
— | — | UNCW -2.3 | — | 65.8 | — | 60% UNCW | › | |
| Half final | 6-4 · #83 5-4 · #37 |
— | — | CREI -3.0 | — | 73.2 | — | 63% CREI | › | |
| Half final | 5-2 · #242 7-3 · #35 |
— | — | CLEM -12.6 | — | 71.9 | — | 92% CLEM | › | |
| Half final | 4-4 · #76 8-1 · #14 |
— | — | LOU -9.1 | — | 74.0 | — | 84% LOU | › | |
| Half final | 10-0 · #27 8-2 · #4 |
— | — | ILL -5.5 | — | 73.8 | — | 73% ILL | › | |
| Half final | 3-5 · #110 8-1 · #138 |
— | — | BEL -6.5 | — | 71.7 | — | 76% BEL | › | |
| Half final | 4-3 · #182 4-5 · #57 |
— | — | ORE -6.8 | — | 68.4 | — | 77% ORE | › | |
| Half final | 3-5 · #180 6-4 · #231 |
— | — | MRSH -0.8 | — | 70.9 | — | 53% MRSH | › | |
| Half final | 2-7 · #312 3-6 · #263 |
— | — | DEN -2.2 | — | 77.8 | — | 60% DEN | › | |
| Half final | 7-3 · #132 7-2 · #118 |
— | — | AKR -3.3 | — | 80.4 | — | 64% AKR | › | |
| Half final | 2-5 · #192 8-1 · #65 |
— | — | COLO -12.2 | — | 73.4 | — | 91% COLO | › | |
| Half final | 5-4 · #166 6-3 · #63 |
— | — | SYR -6.2 | — | 66.3 | — | 75% SYR | › | |
| Half final | 5-2 · #236 2-8 · #290 |
— | — | MRST -1.4 | — | 60.0 | — | 56% MRST | › | |
| Half final | 2-7 · #346 0-8 · #345 |
— | — | MORG -0.1 | — | 67.8 | — | 51% MORG | › | |
| Half final | 3-4 · #337 1-7 · #272 |
— | — | CCSU -3.5 | — | 66.0 | — | 65% CCSU | › | |
| Half final | 3-6 · #124 5-4 · #324 |
— | — | LAS -0.3 | — | 68.1 | — | 52% LAS | › | |
| Half final | 5-5 · #74 7-2 · #32 |
— | — | VILL -6.2 | — | 65.3 | — | 75% VILL | › | |
| Half final | 2-6 · #252 3-4 · #300 |
— | — | HCU -1.1 | — | 63.5 | — | 55% HCU | › | |
| Half final | 2-5 · #227 7-3 · #21 |
— | — | AUB -14.3 | — | 74.5 | — | 94% AUB | › | |
| Half final | 2-6 · #162 5-5 · #99 |
— | — | ORST -2.1 | — | 68.4 | — | 59% ORST | › | |
| Half final | 1-7 · #318 8-1 · #92 |
— | — | CAL -11.9 | — | 70.5 | — | 90% CAL | › | |
| Half final | 9-1 · #142 3-6 · #128 |
— | — | SBU -3.2 | — | 71.5 | — | 64% SBU | › | |
| Half final | 7-2 · #116 7-1 · #58 |
— | — | USU -4.7 | — | 69.6 | — | 69% USU | › | |
| Half final | 7-3 · #16 7-3 · #48 |
— | — | KU -0.1 | — | 71.0 | — | 50% NCSU | › | |
| Half final | 2-5 · #321 2-6 · #146 |
— | — | USD -2.3 | — | 69.1 | — | 60% USD | › | |
| Half final | 1-7 · #267 6-3 · #56 |
— | — | WASH -14.4 | — | 71.9 | — | 94% WASH | › | |
| Half final | 4-5 · #204 6-2 · #131 |
— | — | UNI -3.8 | — | 70.6 | — | 66% UNI | › | |
| Half final | 5-4 · #195 7-1 · #104 |
— | — | RICH -2.5 | — | 72.6 | — | 61% RICH | › | |
| Half final | 2-8 · #278 2-7 · #314 |
— | — | L-MD -0.8 | — | 69.8 | — | 54% L-MD | › | |
| Half final | 3-6 · #240 9-0 · #22 |
— | — | VAN -18.5 | — | 74.6 | — | 98% VAN | › | |
| Half final | 0-7 · #339 6-3 · #79 |
— | — | SC -15.3 | — | 68.9 | — | 95% SC | › | |
| Half final | 5-5 · #296 4-4 · #298 |
— | — | GASO -0.4 | — | 74.3 | — | 52% GASO | › | |
| Half final | 8-2 · #60 7-2 · #106 |
— | — | SCU -0.4 | — | 73.3 | — | 52% SCU | › | |
| Half final | 7-2 · #85 4-5 · #143 |
— | — | STAN -3.4 | — | 69.2 | — | 65% STAN | › | |
| Half final | 0-7 · #333 7-3 · #91 |
— | — | DAY -14.9 | — | 75.5 | — | 95% DAY | › | |
| Half final | 8-2 · #38 6-4 · #19 |
— | — | UK -2.2 | — | 74.0 | — | 59% UK | › | |
| Half final | 9-0 · #8 6-4 · #50 |
— | — | MICH -13.4 | — | 73.6 | — | 93% MICH | › | |
| Half final | 5-5 · #62 9-1 · #67 |
— | — | HALL -5.3 | — | 64.2 | — | 72% HALL | › | |
| Half final | 5-4 · #283 5-4 · #80 |
— | — | GCU -9.4 | — | 66.3 | — | 85% GCU | › | |
| Half final | 8-3 · #47 7-2 · #33 |
— | — | OSU -1.8 | — | 68.1 | — | 58% OSU | › | |
| Half final | 5-4 · #161 8-1 · #69 |
— | — | SLU -6.4 | — | 71.4 | — | 76% SLU | › | |
| Half final | 9-1 · #55 8-1 · #51 |
— | — | LSU -1.3 | — | 78.0 | — | 56% LSU | › | |
| Half final | 4-5 · #281 8-1 · #24 |
— | — | BYU -18.1 | — | 72.0 | — | 98% BYU | › | |
| Half final | 8-0 · #5 7-2 · #15 |
— | — | ALA -0.1 | — | 82.0 | — | 50% ALA | › | |
| Half final | 1-7 · #172 3-7 · #329 |
— | — | CSUB -0.2 | — | 69.8 | — | 51% CSUB | › | |
| Half final | 2-4 · #245 4-5 · #98 |
— | — | UNLV -7.9 | — | 76.4 | — | 80% UNLV | › | |
| Half final | 4-5 · #53 7-3 · #73 |
— | — | MSST -2.6 | — | 76.5 | — | 61% MSST | › | |
| Half final | 5-4 · #107 7-3 · #96 |
— | — | NEV -4.4 | — | 72.8 | — | 68% NEV | › | |
| Half final | 7-2 · #26 9-1 · #17 |
— | — | GONZ -5.2 | — | 70.2 | — | 72% GONZ | › | |
| Half final | 6-3 · #130 7-1 · #123 |
— | — | UCSD -3.8 | — | 71.7 | — | 66% UCSD | › | |
| Half final | 0-5 · #190 7-2 · #140 |
— | — | HAW -6.5 | — | 64.7 | — | 76% HAW | › |
The model’s 1st half is fitted from its full-game numbers and past halves; ESPN posts no 1st-half lines for college games. The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record