Day in numbers

Tap a number to filter the games below

Games2222 final · 0 to play
Lines moved161+ pt since the open · 22 with a line
Totals moved201+ pt since the open
Favorites ATS7-1532% covered
Upsets7outright
Over / Under11-1150% over
Model Favorite15-768% won
GameSpread, open → closeMovedTotalMoved
FOR @ JOESJOES -5.5 → JOES -3.52 → FOR130.5 → 135.5▲ 5
SJSU @ UNLVUNLV -12.5 → UNLV -12.5no move154.5 → 149.5▼ 5
UVA @ FSUUVA -7.5 → UVA -8.51 → UVA151.5 → 155.5▲ 4
BYU @ BAYBYU -1.5 → BYU -3.52 → BYU162.5 → 158.5▼ 4
URI @ GWGW -3.5 → GW -5.52 → GW149.5 → 151.5▲ 2
ND @ SMUSMU -12.5 → SMU -10.52 → ND152.5 → 154.5▲ 2
WIS @ ILLILL -11.5 → ILL -9.52 → WIS156.5 → 153.5▼ 3
DUKE @ PITTDUKE -15.5 → DUKE -17.52 → DUKE137.5 → 136.5▼ 1
ARK @ LSUARK -3.5 → ARK -4.51 → ARK163.5 → 159.5▼ 4
FRES @ USUUSU -19.5 → USU -21.52 → USU150.5 → 152.5▲ 2
Line movedCoveredCover rate
1+ pts5579-5698-549%
2+ pts2172-2236-249%
3+ pts880-90849%
5+ pts139-14948%
Sort by

Sort

Sort by
No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
FinalConference
8-17 · #235
92
5-18 · #340
88
Spread
MILW -2.5
✓ MILW W ATS
Total
158.5 ▼3
▲ Over 180
Projected
84–82
✓ MILW won
Model: MILW by 0.4 ✓ Model: Over 7.4 ✓
FinalConference
19-4 · #23 AP #13
80
21-2 · #27 AP #7
77
Spread
NEB -2.5
✓ PUR W ATS
Total
146.5 ▲3
▲ Over 157
Projected
75–72
✓ PUR won
Model: PUR by 5.4 ✓ Model: Under 0.2 ✗
FinalConference
19-4 · #44 AP #11
66
18-5 · #25
75
Spread
MIA -1.5
✓ MIA W ATS
Total
156.5 ▼2
▼ Under 141
Projected
79–78
✗ UNC lost
Model: UNC by 2.2 ✗ Model: Under 0.1 ✓
FinalConference
20-3 · #20 AP #15
61
11-12 · #81
58
Spread
UVA -8.5
✓ FSU W ATS
Total
155.5 ▲4
▼ Under 119
Projected
82–76
✓ UVA won
Model: FSU by 2.3 ✓ Model: Over 2.3 ✗
FinalConference
19-4 · #22 AP #19
84
14-9 · #21
76
Spread
AUB -3.5
✓ VAN W ATS
Total
161.5 ▼2
▼ Under 160
Projected
82–85
✗ AUB lost
Model: VAN by 0.8 ✓ Model: Over 5.6 ✗
FinalConference
BYU
17-6 · #24 AP #22
99
12-10 · #29
94
Spread
BYU -3.5
✓ BYU W ATS
Total
158.5 ▼4
▲ Over 193
Projected
83–81
✓ BYU won
Model: BAY by 1.0 ✗ Model: Over 5.7 ✓
FinalConference
14-9 · #105
70
12-11 · #101
75
Spread
GW -5.5
✓ URI W ATS
Total
151.5 ▲2
▼ Under 145
Projected
73–79
✓ GW won
Model: GW by 0.2 ✗ Model: Over 0.1 ✗
FinalConference
20-3 · #93
70
12-11 · #104
82
Spread
GMU -3.5
✓ RICH W ATS
Total
139.5
▲ Over 152
Projected
73–70
✗ GMU lost
Model: RICH by 0.2 ✓ Model: Over 3.3 ✓
FinalConference
9-12 · #100
68
13-9 · #114
64
Spread
JOES -3.5
✓ FOR W ATS
Total
135.5 ▲5
▼ Under 132
Projected
67–70
✗ JOES lost
Model: JOES by 0.3 ✗ Model: Over 1.5 ✗
FinalConference
11-13 · #71
81
SMU
16-7 · #55
89
Spread
SMU -10.5
✓ ND W ATS
Total
154.5 ▲2
▲ Over 170
Projected
73–83
✓ SMU won
Model: ND by 0.4 ✓ Model: Over 1.7 ✓
FinalConference
9-15 · #42
74
18-5 · #32
77
Spread
VILL -9.5
✓ MARQ W ATS
Total
144.5 ▲1
▲ Over 151
Projected
69–78
✓ VILL won
Model: VILL by 0.1 ✗ Model: Over 2.3 ✓
FinalConference
16-7 · #41
92
20-4 · #4 AP #8
90
Spread
ILL -9.5
✓ WIS W ATS
Total
153.5 ▼3
▲ Over 182
Projected
75–85
✗ ILL lost
Model: ILL by 0.9 ✗ Model: Over 6.6 ✓
FinalConference
7-15 · #361
70
1-21 · #365
79
Spread
EIU -4.5
✓ WIU W ATS
Total
133.5 ▲1
▲ Over 149
Projected
69–65
✗ EIU lost
Model: WIU by 0.4 ✓ Model: Under 0.1 ✗
FinalConference
21-2 · #2 AP #3
66
Utah
9-14 · #73
52
Spread
HOU -16.5
✓ UTAH W ATS
Total
142.5 ▼1
▼ Under 118
Projected
81–64
✓ HOU won
Model: HOU by 0.7 ✗ Model: Over 2.1 ✗
FinalConference
Duke
21-2 · #3 AP #4
70
Pitt
9-15 · #74
54
Spread
DUKE -17.5
✓ PITT W ATS
Total
136.5 ▼1
▼ Under 124
Projected
78–62
✓ DUKE won
Model: PITT by 1.0 ✓ Model: Over 3.2 ✗
FinalConference
21-2 · #13 AP #5
55
TCU
14-9 · #40
62
Spread
ISU -7.5
✓ TCU W ATS
Total
147.5
▼ Under 117
Projected
78–70
✗ ISU lost
Model: ISU by 1.0 ✗ Model: Over 0.9 ✗
FinalConference
17-6 · #18 AP #21
91
LSU
14-9 · #51
62
Spread
ARK -4.5
✓ ARK W ATS
Total
159.5 ▼4
▼ Under 153
Projected
84–81
✓ ARK won
Model: LSU by 1.9 ✗ Model: Over 5.7 ✗
FinalConference
10-12 · #174
78
19-3 · #58
91
Spread
USU -21.5
✓ FRES W ATS
Total
152.5 ▲2
▲ Over 169
Projected
66–84
✓ USU won
Model: FRES by 3.5 ✓ Model: Under 2.4 ✗
FinalConference
16-7 · #45
76
12-12 · #60
85
Spread
ASU -3.5
✓ ASU W ATS
Total
163.5 ▼1
▼ Under 161
Projected
83–83
✓ ASU won
Model: OKST by 3.1 ✗ Model: Over 2.3 ✗
FinalConference
12-10 · #87
91
3-20 · #220
74
Spread
CSU -16.5
✓ CSU W ATS
Total
137.5 ▲3
▲ Over 165
Projected
74–59
✓ CSU won
Model: AF by 1.4 ✗ Model: Under 5.2 ✗
FinalConference
10-15 · #139
53
23-2 · #17 AP #12
83
Spread
GONZ -21.5
✓ GONZ W ATS
Total
156.5 ▼2
▼ Under 136
Projected
68–89
✓ GONZ won
Model: WSU by 0.4 ✗ Model: Over 1.2 ✗
FinalConference
5-17 · #143
75
UNLV
10-12 · #98
82
Spread
UNLV -12.5
✓ SJSU W ATS
Total
149.5 ▼5
▲ Over 157
Projected
72–81
✓ UNLV won
Model: SJSU by 3.3 ✓ Model: Over 3.3 ✓
StatusMatchupSpreadTotalModel lineSpread edgeModel totalTotal edgeWin probModel
Final
8-17 · #235
92
5-18 · #340
88
MILW -2.5 158.5 MILW -2.9 MILW +0.4 165.9 Over 7.4 60% MILW W W ›
Final
19-4 · #23
80
21-2 · #27
77
NEB -2.5 146.5 PUR -2.9 PUR +5.4 146.3 Under 0.2 60% PUR W L ›
Final
19-4 · #44
66
18-5 · #25
75
MIA -1.5 156.5 UNC -0.7 UNC +2.2 156.4 Under 0.1 52% UNC L W ›
Final
20-3 · #20
61
11-12 · #81
58
UVA -8.5 155.5 UVA -6.2 FSU +2.3 157.8 Over 2.3 70% UVA W L ›
Final
19-4 · #22
84
14-9 · #21
76
AUB -3.5 161.5 AUB -2.7 VAN +0.8 167.1 Over 5.6 59% AUB W L ›
Final
17-6 · #24
99
12-10 · #29
94
BYU -3.5 158.5 BYU -2.5 BAY +1.0 164.2 Over 5.7 59% BYU L W ›
Final
14-9 · #105
70
12-11 · #101
75
GW -5.5 151.5 GW -5.7 GW +0.2 151.6 Over 0.1 69% GW L L ›
Final
20-3 · #93
70
12-11 · #104
82
GMU -3.5 139.5 GMU -3.3 RICH +0.2 142.8 Over 3.3 61% GMU W W ›
Final
9-12 · #100
68
13-9 · #114
64
JOES -3.5 135.5 JOES -3.8 JOES +0.3 137.0 Over 1.5 63% JOES L L ›
Final
11-13 · #71
81
16-7 · #55
89
SMU -10.5 154.5 SMU -10.1 ND +0.4 156.2 Over 1.7 81% SMU W W ›
Final
9-15 · #42
74
18-5 · #32
77
VILL -9.5 144.5 VILL -9.6 VILL +0.1 146.8 Over 2.3 80% VILL L W ›
Final
16-7 · #41
92
20-4 · #4
90
ILL -9.5 153.5 ILL -10.4 ILL +0.9 160.1 Over 6.6 82% ILL L W ›
Final
7-15 · #361
70
1-21 · #365
79
EIU -4.5 133.5 EIU -4.1 WIU +0.4 133.4 Under 0.1 64% EIU W L ›
Final
21-2 · #2
66
9-14 · #73
52
HOU -16.5 142.5 HOU -17.2 HOU +0.7 144.6 Over 2.1 93% HOU L L ›
Final
21-2 · #3
70
9-15 · #74
54
DUKE -17.5 136.5 DUKE -16.5 PITT +1.0 139.7 Over 3.2 93% DUKE W L ›
Final
21-2 · #13
55
14-9 · #40
62
ISU -7.5 147.5 ISU -8.5 ISU +1.0 148.4 Over 0.9 77% ISU L L ›
Final
17-6 · #18
91
14-9 · #51
62
ARK -4.5 159.5 ARK -2.6 LSU +1.9 165.2 Over 5.7 59% ARK L L ›
Final
10-12 · #174
78
19-3 · #58
91
USU -21.5 152.5 USU -18.0 FRES +3.5 150.1 Under 2.4 94% USU W L ›
Final
16-7 · #45
76
12-12 · #60
85
ASU -3.5 163.5 ASU -0.4 OKST +3.1 165.8 Over 2.3 51% ASU L L ›
Final
12-10 · #87
91
3-20 · #220
74
CSU -16.5 137.5 CSU -15.1 AF +1.4 132.3 Under 5.2 91% CSU L L ›
Final
10-15 · #139
53
23-2 · #17
83
GONZ -21.5 156.5 GONZ -21.1 WSU +0.4 157.7 Over 1.2 97% GONZ L L ›
Final
5-17 · #143
75
10-12 · #98
82
UNLV -12.5 149.5 UNLV -9.2 SJSU +3.3 152.8 Over 3.3 79% UNLV W W ›
The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record