CHI Health Center Omaha · at Creighton · Conference game
Closing line
CREI -8.5✓ GTWN covered by 5.5
CREI -8.5✓ GTWN covered by 5.5Closing total147.5Over by 21.5
 GTWN | This season | CREI |
|---|---|---|
| 9-7 | Record | 10-7 |
| 3-13 | ATS | 8-9 |
| 11-5 | O/U | 7-10 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: GTWN 70–80 CREI · ✓ CREI (82%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | OT | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTWN | 36 | 40 | 7 | 83 |
| CREI | 38 | 38 | 10 | 86 |
1st half: GTWN 36, CREI 38 (CREI by 2). The model had CREI by 6.0 and a total of 70.3 (actual 74).
Team stats
| GTWN | CREI | |
|---|---|---|
| 33-58 57% | Field goals | 32-61 52% |
| 7-16 44% | 3-pointers | 13-33 39% |
| 10-14 71% | Free throws | 9-11 82% |
| 32 9 off | Rebounds | 24 7 off |
| 15 | Assists | 10 |
| 3 | Steals | 7 |
| 1 | Blocks | 2 |
| 8 | Turnovers | 6 |
| 17 | Fouls | 14 |
| 50 | Points in paint | 28 |
| 5 | Fast-break points | 15 |
Players
| GTWN | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KJ Lewis G | 38 | 14 | 6 | 3 | 5-11 | 3-4 |
| Langston Love G | 36 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 2-5 | 1-2 |
| Caleb Williams F | 35 | 12 | 5 | 4 | 4-4 | 2-2 |
| Malik Mack G | 33 | 17 | 2 | 4 | 7-10 | 1-3 |
| Vince Iwuchukwu C | 22 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 5-10 | 0-2 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Julius Halaifonua C | 23 | 16 | 6 | 3 | 7-11 | 0-1 |
| Jeremiah Williams G | 19 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1-4 | 0-1 |
| Jayden Fort F | 10 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| Kayvaun Mulready G | 9 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1-2 | 0-1 |
Did not play: Hashem Asadallah, Gabriel Landeira, Seal Diouf, Michael Van Raaphorst, Mason Moses, DeShawn Harris-Smith, Isaiah Abraham, Austin Montgomery
| CREI | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Josh Dix G | 42 | 15 | 3 | 1 | 6-12 | 2-7 |
| Austin Swartz G | 34 | 33 | 0 | 2 | 12-16 | 8-12 |
| Isaac Traudt F | 24 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1-4 | 1-4 |
| Jasen Green F | 21 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3-7 | 0-2 |
| Ty Davis G | 10 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Nik Graves G | 35 | 13 | 4 | 5 | 4-11 | 1-4 |
| Blake Harper G | 21 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2-3 | 1-1 |
| Kerem Konan F | 18 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| Fedor Zugic G | 14 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0-3 | 0-3 |
| Owen Freeman F | 6 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Aleksa Dimitrijevic, Hudson Greer, Josh Townley-Thomas, Shane Thomas, Jackson McAndrew, Liam McChesney
Loading the game…
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edgeResult
Spread
MarketCREI -8.5
ModelCREI -10.3
Model edgeCREI +1.8
L GTWN covered
Total
Market147.5
Model150.1
Model edgeOver 2.6
W Over
Projected score
GTWN 69.9 · CREI 80.2
GTWN 83 · CREI 86
Win probability
CREI 82%
1st half
Spread
CREI -6.0
CREI -2.0
Total
70.3
74 points
Projected score
GTWN 32.1 · CREI 38.2
GTWN 36 · CREI 38
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenCREI -9.5
1 → GTWN
CloseCREI -8.5
1 pt toward GTWN
Total
Open148.5
▼ 1
Close147.5
Down 1 since the open
Moneyline
GTWN +320 · CREI -410
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened CREI -9.5 · closed CREI -8.5 · moved 1 toward GTWNmodel CREI -10.5
model CREI -10.5
Opened 148.5 · closed 147.5 · moved 1 downmodel 150
model 150
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GTWN | 4-6 40% | 1-9 10% | 6-4 60% |
| CREI | 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 8 since 2021-22
GTWN 1–7 CREICREI leads · 8 games since 2021-22 · GTWN 3-4-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2024-25 | GTWN 69 @ CREI 80 | CREI -13.5 | GTWN W |
| Dec 18, 2024-25 | CREI 57 @ GTWN 81 | GTWN +4.5 | GTWN W |
| Feb 13, 2023-24 | GTWN 72 @ CREI 94 | CREI -18.5 | CREI W |
| Jan 2, 2023-24 | CREI 77 @ GTWN 60 | GTWN +12.5 | CREI W |
| Mar 1, 2022-23 | GTWN 59 @ CREI 99 | CREI -17.5 | CREI W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Georgetown
16 games played
Straight up
9-7
56% wins
Against the spread
3-13
19% covers · avg −4.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
11-5
69% overs · avg +4.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs MORG | W 87-70 | -27.5 | L −10.5 | 154.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 7 | @ MD | W 70-60 | +4.5 | W +14.5 | 144.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 12 | vs BING | W 83-70 | -27.5 | L −14.5 | 141.5 | O 153 |
| Nov 15 | vs CLEM | W 79-74 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 142.5 | O 153 |
| Nov 22 | vs WAG | W 92-75 | -25.5 | L −8.5 | 140.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 27 | vs DAY | L 79-84 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 145.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 28 | vs MIA | L 65-78 | +5.5 | L −7.5 | 151.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 3 | vs UMBC | W 90-81 | -19.5 | L −10.5 | 149.5 | O 171 |
| Dec 7 | @ UNC | L 61-81 | +10.5 | L −9.5 | 149.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 13 | vs SPU | W 76-68 | -20.5 | L −12.5 | 140.5 | O 144 |
| Dec 17 | @ MARQ | W 78-69 | +6.5 | W +15.5 | 149.5 | U 147 |
| Dec 20 | vs XAV | L 77-80 | -4.5 | L −7.5 | 149.5 | O 157 |
| Dec 22 | vs COPP | W 97-67 | -33.5 | L −3.5 | 150.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 31 | vs SJU | L 83-95 | +8.5 | L −3.5 | 152.5 | O 178 |
| Jan 6 | @ DEP | L 50-56 | +2.5 | L −3.5 | 144.5 | U 106 |
| Jan 10 | vs HALL | L 67-76 | +1.5 | L −7.5 | 137.5 | O 143 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vsMORG
MORGW 87-70
−10.5
7
@MD
MDW 70-60
+14.5
12
vsBING
BINGW 83-70
−14.5
15
vsCLEM
CLEMW 79-74
+6.5
22
vsWAG
WAGW 92-75
−8.5
27
vsDAY
DAYL 79-84
−3.5
28
vsMIA
MIAL 65-78
−7.5
3
vsUMBC
UMBCW 90-81
−10.5
7
@UNC
UNCL 61-81
−9.5
13
vsSPU
SPUW 76-68
−12.5
17
@MARQ
MARQW 78-69
+15.5
20
vsXAV
XAVL 77-80
−7.5
22
vsCOPP
COPPW 97-67
−3.5
31
vsSJU
SJUL 83-95
−3.5
6
@DEP
DEPL 50-56
−3.5
10
vsHALL
HALLL 67-76
−7.5
covered 3didn’t cover 13avg −4.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vsMORG
MORGW 87-70
+2.5
7
@MD
MDW 70-60
−14.5
12
vsBING
BINGW 83-70
+11.5
15
vsCLEM
CLEMW 79-74
+10.5
22
vsWAG
WAGW 92-75
+26.5
27
vsDAY
DAYL 79-84
+17.5
28
vsMIA
MIAL 65-78
−8.5
3
vsUMBC
UMBCW 90-81
+21.5
7
@UNC
UNCL 61-81
−7.5
13
vsSPU
SPUW 76-68
+3.5
17
@MARQ
MARQW 78-69
−2.5
20
vsXAV
XAVL 77-80
+7.5
22
vsCOPP
COPPW 97-67
+13.5
31
vsSJU
SJUL 83-95
+25.5
6
@DEP
DEPL 50-56
−38.5
10
vsHALL
HALLL 67-76
+5.5
over 11under 5avg +4.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Creighton
17 games played
Straight up
10-7
59% wins
Against the spread
8-9
47% covers · avg −0.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
7-10
41% overs · avg −3.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5 | vs SDAK | W 92-76 | -29.5 | L −13.5 | 169.5 | U 168 |
| Nov 11 | @ GONZ | L 63-90 | +12.5 | L −14.5 | 164.5 | U 153 |
| Nov 14 | vs UMES | W 84-45 | -33.5 | W +5.5 | 135.5 | U 129 |
| Nov 19 | vs UND | W 75-60 | -29.5 | L −14.5 | 155.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 24 | vs BAY | L 74-81 | +3.5 | L −3.5 | 154.5 | O 155 |
| Nov 25 | vs ISU | L 60-78 | +9.5 | L −8.5 | 152.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 27 | vs ORE | W 76-66 | -2.5 | W +7.5 | 150.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 2 | vs NICH | W 96-76 | -18.5 | W +1.5 | 143.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 7 | @ NEB | L 50-71 | +5.5 | L −15.5 | 155.5 | U 121 |
| Dec 13 | vs KSU | L 76-83 | -4.5 | L −11.5 | 159.5 | U 159 |
| Dec 17 | @XAV | W 98-57 | +2.5 | W +43.5 | 151.5 | O 155 |
| Dec 20 | vsMARQ | W 84-63 | -6.5 | W +14.5 | 151.5 | U 147 |
| Dec 22 | vs UTU | W 92-69 | -19.5 | W +3.5 | 147.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 30 | vs BTLR | W 89-85 | -5.5 | L −1.5 | 156.5 | O 174 |
| Jan 4 | @HALL | L 54-56 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 143.5 | U 110 |
| Jan 7 | @ VILL | W 76-72 | +4.5 | W +8.5 | 142.5 | O 148 |
| Jan 10 | vsSJU | L 73-90 | +2.5 | L −14.5 | 152.5 | O 163 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
5
vsSDAK
SDAKW 92-76
−13.5
11
@GONZ
GONZL 63-90
−14.5
14
vsUMES
UMESW 84-45
+5.5
19
vsUND
UNDW 75-60
−14.5
24
vsBAY
BAYL 74-81
−3.5
25
vsISU
ISUL 60-78
−8.5
27
vsORE
OREW 76-66
+7.5
2
vsNICH
NICHW 96-76
+1.5
7
@NEB
NEBL 50-71
−15.5
13
vsKSU
KSUL 76-83
−11.5
17
@XAV
XAVW 98-57
+43.5
20
vsMARQ
MARQW 84-63
+14.5
22
vsUTU
UTUW 92-69
+3.5
30
vsBTLR
BTLRW 89-85
−1.5
4
@HALL
HALLL 54-56
+1.5
7
@VILL
VILLW 76-72
+8.5
10
vsSJU
SJUL 73-90
−14.5
covered 8didn’t cover 9avg −0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
5
vsSDAK
SDAKW 92-76
−1.5
11
@GONZ
GONZL 63-90
−11.5
14
vsUMES
UMESW 84-45
−6.5
19
vsUND
UNDW 75-60
−20.5
24
vsBAY
BAYL 74-81
+0.5
25
vsISU
ISUL 60-78
−14.5
27
vsORE
OREW 76-66
−8.5
2
vsNICH
NICHW 96-76
+28.5
7
@NEB
NEBL 50-71
−34.5
13
vsKSU
KSUL 76-83
−0.5
17
@XAV
XAVW 98-57
+3.5
20
vsMARQ
MARQW 84-63
−4.5
22
vsUTU
UTUW 92-69
+13.5
30
vsBTLR
BTLRW 89-85
+17.5
4
@HALL
HALLL 54-56
−33.5
7
@VILL
VILLW 76-72
+5.5
10
vsSJU
SJUL 73-90
+10.5
over 7under 10avg −3.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Georgetown
9-7 overall · 1-4 in conference · Big East Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Seton Hall67–76
- L@ DePaul50–56
- Lvs St John's83–95
- Wvs Coppin St97–67
- Lvs Xavier77–80
3 days since their last game.
Creighton
10-7 overall · 4-2 in conference · Big East Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs St John's73–90
- W@ Villanova76–72
- L@ Seton Hall54–56
- Wvs Butler89–85
- Wvs Utah Tech92–69
3 days since their last game.