Kathleen and Tom Elam Center · at UT Martin · Conference game
Closing line
UTM -10.5✓ EIU covered by 6.5
Closing total133.5Under by 7.5
| This season | UTM | |
|---|---|---|
| 2-9 | Record | 7-4 |
| 7-4 | ATS | 6-5 |
| 5-6 | O/U | 4-7 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: EIU 64–72 UTM · ✓ UTM (77%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| EIU | 41 | 20 | 61 |
| UTM | 34 | 31 | 65 |
1st half: EIU 41, UTM 34 (EIU by 7). The model had UTM by 5.0 and a total of 63.6 (actual 75).
Team stats
| EIU | UTM | |
|---|---|---|
| 20-57 35% | Field goals | 18-48 38% |
| 6-24 25% | 3-pointers | 7-29 24% |
| 15-23 65% | Free throws | 22-26 85% |
| 34 13 off | Rebounds | 41 11 off |
| 13 | Assists | 10 |
| 14 | Steals | 7 |
| 4 | Blocks | 9 |
| 12 | Turnovers | 18 |
| 21 | Fouls | 16 |
| 18 | Points in paint | 20 |
| 19 | Fast-break points | 13 |
Players
| EIU | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meechie White G | 33 | 12 | 4 | 2 | 4-10 | 2-4 |
| Terry McMorris F | 33 | 4 | 9 | 2 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
| Andre Washington G | 21 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 1-7 | 1-6 |
| Preston Turner G | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| Nazareth Fisher F | 6 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Kooper Jacobi F | 35 | 16 | 7 | 1 | 6-14 | 2-7 |
| Zion Fruster G | 30 | 17 | 3 | 4 | 7-15 | 1-4 |
| Malik Olafioye G | 20 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 2-5 | 0-1 |
| Prince Johnson F | 6 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Markus Blackwell G | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
Did not play: Kyle Layton, Shane Sims, Andrew Austin, JT Elder
| UTM | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrija Bukumirovic F | 32 | 7 | 14 | 4 | 2-4 | 0-1 |
| Matas Deniusas F | 31 | 19 | 9 | 1 | 6-14 | 3-9 |
| Pedro Santos G | 27 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 4-9 | 1-4 |
| Filip Radakovic G | 26 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 0-5 | 0-2 |
| Luca Colceag F | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-4 | 0-4 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Afan Trnka G | 27 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 3-6 | 2-5 |
| Ty Price G | 13 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1-4 | 1-4 |
| Damien King G | 11 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Lamine Niang C | 9 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| Vladimir Khryapa F | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| AJ Hopkins F | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Will Hopkins, Filip Petkovski, Ama Sow, Charlie King, James Bass, Enrique Moya, Dragos Lungu, Lucas Williams
Loading the game…
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edgeResult
Spread
MarketUTM -10.5
ModelUTM -8.5
Model edgeEIU +2.0
W EIU covered
Total
Market133.5
Model135.6
Model edgeOver 2.1
L Under
Projected score
EIU 63.6 · UTM 72.1
EIU 61 · UTM 65
Win probability
UTM 77%
1st half
Spread
UTM -5.0
EIU -7.0
Total
63.6
75 points
Projected score
EIU 29.3 · UTM 34.3
EIU 41 · UTM 34
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenUTM -9.5
1 → UTM
CloseUTM -10.5
1 pt toward UTM
Total
Open134.5
▼ 1
Close133.5
Down 1 since the open
Moneyline
EIU +455 · UTM -625
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened UTM -9.5 · closed UTM -10.5 · moved 1 toward UTMmodel UTM -8.5
model UTM -8.5
Opened 134.5 · closed 133.5 · moved 1 downmodel 135.5
model 135.5
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2-8 20% | 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% | |
| 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 8 since 2021-22
EIU 4–4 UTMSeries tied · 8 games since 2021-22 · UTM has won the last 3 meetings · EIU 5-3 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2024-25 | UTM 72 @ EIU 68 | EIU +2.5 | UTM W |
| Jan 16, 2024-25 | EIU 63 @ UTM 68 | UTM -5.5 | EIU W |
| Feb 1, 2023-24 | UTM 76 @ EIU 59 | EIU -0.5 | UTM W |
| Jan 4, 2023-24 | EIU 79 @ UTM 72 | UTM -9.5 | EIU W |
| Feb 9, 2022-23 | UTM 75 @ EIU 77 | EIU +4.5 | EIU W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
E Illinois
11 games played
Straight up
2-9
18% wins
Against the spread
7-4
64% covers · avg +1.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
5-6
45% overs · avg −3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | @ | L 63-66 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 144.5 | U 129 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 65-57 | +2.5 | W +10.5 | 135.5 | U 122 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 58-78 | +23.5 | W +3.5 | 143.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 53-99 | +35.5 | L −10.5 | 147.5 | O 152 |
| Nov 25 | @ | L 60-81 | +5.5 | L −15.5 | 139.5 | O 141 |
| Nov 28 | @ | L 62-109 | +40.5 | L −6.5 | 141.5 | O 171 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 74-82 | +8.5 | W +0.5 | 145.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 10 | vs | L 59-68 | +6.5 | L −2.5 | 149.5 | U 127 |
| Dec 14 | @ | L 53-78 | +43.5 | W +18.5 | 144.5 | U 131 |
| Dec 18 | vs | W 76-72 | +6.5 | W +10.5 | 134.5 | O 148 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 59-68 | +12.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | U 127 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
@
VAL
L 63-66
+2.5
7
vs
NICH
W 65-57
+10.5
11
@
ND
L 58-78
+3.5
14
@
UK
L 53-99
−10.5
25
@
CARK
L 60-81
−15.5
28
@
PUR
L 62-109
−6.5
6
vs
LIN
L 74-82
+0.5
10
vs
EKU
L 59-68
−2.5
14
@
ISU
L 53-78
+18.5
18
vs
SIUE
W 76-72
+10.5
1
@
SEMO
L 59-68
+3.5
covered 7didn’t cover 4avg +1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
@
VAL
L 63-66
−15.5
7
vs
NICH
W 65-57
−13.5
11
@
ND
L 58-78
−7.5
14
@
UK
L 53-99
+4.5
25
@
CARK
L 60-81
+1.5
28
@
PUR
L 62-109
+29.5
6
vs
LIN
L 74-82
+10.5
10
vs
EKU
L 59-68
−22.5
14
@
ISU
L 53-78
−13.5
18
vs
SIUE
W 76-72
+13.5
1
@
SEMO
L 59-68
−19.5
over 5under 6avg −3 ptslonger = bigger margin
UT Martin
11 games played
Straight up
7-4
64% wins
Against the spread
6-5
55% covers · avg +3.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
4-7
36% overs · avg −5.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | @ | W 86-81 | +16.5 | W +21.5 | 146.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 12 | @ | W 78-67 | +15.5 | W +26.5 | 144.5 | O 145 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 73-87 | +19.5 | W +5.5 | 165.5 | U 160 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 69-68 | -10.5 | L −9.5 | 155.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 23 | vs | L 60-70 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 146.5 | U 130 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 73-56 | -3.5 | W +13.5 | 147.5 | U 129 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 74-64 | -6.5 | W +3.5 | 144.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 10 | @ | L 54-83 | +8.5 | L −20.5 | 146.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 18 | @ | L 71-78 | +2.5 | L −4.5 | 141.5 | O 149 |
| Dec 20 | @ | W 86-62 | -2.5 | W +21.5 | 145.5 | O 148 |
| Jan 1 | vs | W 67-60 | -13.5 | L −6.5 | 140.5 | U 127 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
@
UNLV
W 86-81
+21.5
12
@
BRAD
W 78-67
+26.5
18
@
FSU
L 73-87
+5.5
22
vs
PV
W 69-68
−9.5
23
vs
USM
L 60-70
−11.5
2
vs
CHSO
W 73-56
+13.5
7
vs
ALST
W 74-64
+3.5
10
@
SIU
L 54-83
−20.5
18
@
TNST
L 71-78
−4.5
20
@
TNTC
W 86-62
+21.5
1
vs
WIU
W 67-60
−6.5
covered 6didn’t cover 5avg +3.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
@
UNLV
W 86-81
+20.5
12
@
BRAD
W 78-67
+0.5
18
@
FSU
L 73-87
−5.5
22
vs
PV
W 69-68
−18.5
23
vs
USM
L 60-70
−16.5
2
vs
CHSO
W 73-56
−18.5
7
vs
ALST
W 74-64
−6.5
10
@
SIU
L 54-83
−9.5
18
@
TNST
L 71-78
+7.5
20
@
TNTC
W 86-62
+2.5
1
vs
WIU
W 67-60
−13.5
over 4under 7avg −5.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
E Illinois
2-9 overall · 1-2 in conference · Ohio Valley Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ SE Missouri59–68
- Wvs SIUE76–72
- L@ Iowa State53–78
- Lvs E Kentucky59–68
- Lvs Lindenwood Lions74–82
2 days since their last game.
UT Martin
7-4 overall · 2-1 in conference · Ohio Valley Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs W Illinois67–60
- W@ Tennessee Tech86–62
- L@ Tennessee St71–78
- L@ S Illinois54–83
- Wvs Alabama St74–64
2 days since their last game.