UTRGV Fieldhouse · at UT Rio Grande · Conference game
Closing line
RGV -2.5✓ AMCC covered by 6.5
RGV -2.5✓ AMCC covered by 6.5Closing total137.5Under by 15.5
 AMCC | This season | RGV |
|---|---|---|
| 2-7 | Record | 3-8 |
| 4-5 | ATS | 5-6 |
| 4-5 | O/U | 4-7 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: AMCC 69–70 RGV · ✗ RGV (53%) lost
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMCC | 28 | 35 | 63 |
| RGV | 28 | 31 | 59 |
1st half: AMCC 28, RGV 28 (tied). The model had RGV by 0.4 and a total of 65.3 (actual 56).
Team stats
| AMCC | RGV | |
|---|---|---|
| 22-51 43% | Field goals | 20-51 39% |
| 4-10 40% | 3-pointers | 2-19 11% |
| 15-24 63% | Free throws | 17-22 77% |
| 38 12 off | Rebounds | 30 9 off |
| 15 | Assists | 11 |
| 5 | Steals | 7 |
| 2 | Blocks | 2 |
| 12 | Turnovers | 11 |
| 20 | Fouls | 21 |
| 30 | Points in paint | 32 |
| 10 | Fast-break points | 4 |
Players
| AMCC | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nick Shogbonyo G | 33 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 4-7 | 2-3 |
| Mason Gibson G | 26 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 3-6 | 0-0 |
| Sheldon Williams F | 19 | 11 | 5 | 1 | 3-9 | 1-2 |
| Leo Torbor G | 17 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 4-8 | 0-2 |
| Cenker Evran F | 16 | 3 | 8 | 1 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Kam Parker G | 24 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 1-4 | 0-1 |
| Jaden Haire F | 19 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| Franck Yetna F | 18 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 3-6 | 0-1 |
| D'Avian Houston G | 13 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 2-6 | 1-1 |
| Kobi Pearson F | 8 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| Daniel Michelini-Jackson G | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Cedric Horton, Trenton Pane, Michael Oaks, Bryson Wheatfall, Kayden Crosby, Jamal Ambrose
| RGV | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marvin McGhee III G | 36 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 0-4 | 0-3 |
| Julien Gomez G | 35 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-2 |
| Koree Cotton G | 32 | 12 | 7 | 2 | 3-16 | 0-7 |
| Jaylen Washington Jr. G | 28 | 15 | 2 | 7 | 6-9 | 0-1 |
| Filip Brankovic F | 23 | 14 | 4 | 1 | 7-11 | 0-2 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Marshal Destremau F | 14 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 2-5 | 1-1 |
| Always Wright G | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| Jalen Ricks G | 9 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2-3 | 1-2 |
| Zae Blake G | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Mustafo Vanjov C | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Kye Dickson, Luis Ramirez, Dane Christensen, Demarris Winters, Kwo Agwa
Loading the game…
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edgeResult
Spread
MarketRGV -2.5
ModelRGV -0.9
Model edgeAMCC +1.6
W AMCC covered
Total
Market137.5
Model139.4
Model edgeOver 1.9
L Under
Projected score
AMCC 69.3 · RGV 70.1
AMCC 63 · RGV 59
Win probability
RGV 53%
1st half
Spread
RGV -0.4
tied
Total
65.3
56 points
Projected score
AMCC 32.5 · RGV 32.9
AMCC 28 · RGV 28
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenRGV -2.5
no move
CloseRGV -2.5
No change since the open
Total
Open137.5
no move
Close137.5
No change since the open
Moneyline
AMCC +124 · RGV -148
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened RGV -2.5 · unchangedmodel RGV -1
model RGV -1
Opened 137.5 · unchangedmodel 139.5
model 139.5
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMCClast 9 | 2-7 22% | 4-5 44% | 4-5 44% |
| RGV | 3-7 30% | 4-6 40% | 3-7 30% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 8 since 2021-22
AMCC 5–3 RGVAMCC leads · 8 games since 2021-22 · AMCC 4-4 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2024-25 | AMCC 73 @ RGV 83 | RGV +2.5 | RGV W |
| Jan 11, 2024-25 | RGV 74 @ AMCC 79 | AMCC -5.5 | RGV W |
| Dec 15, 2023-24 | AMCC 86 @ RGV 76 | RGV -1.5 | AMCC W |
| Dec 6, 2023-24 | RGV 76 @ AMCC 74 | AMCC -4 | RGV W |
| Nov 30, 2022-23 | AMCC 82 @ RGV 89 | RGV +7.5 | RGV W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Texas A&M-CC
9 games played
Straight up
2-7
22% wins
Against the spread
4-5
44% covers · avg +0.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
4-5
44% overs · avg −5.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6 | @ SMU | L 58-69 | +23.5 | W +12.5 | 160.5 | U 127 |
| Nov 8 | @ TAR | L 77-85 | +3.5 | L −4.5 | 142.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 11 | @ KU | L 46-77 | +25.5 | L −5.5 | 145.5 | U 123 |
| Nov 16 | @ OKST | L 69-85 | +20.5 | W +4.5 | 154.5 | U 154 |
| Nov 28 | @ XAV | L 67-88 | +13.5 | L −7.5 | 146.5 | O 155 |
| Dec 6 | @ LAM | W 57-49 | +3.5 | W +11.5 | 136.5 | U 106 |
| Dec 17 | @ SFA | L 60-69 | +6.5 | L −2.5 | 139.5 | U 129 |
| Dec 29 | vs NICH | L 71-76 | -5.5 | L −10.5 | 137.5 | O 147 |
| Dec 31 | vs NOLA | W 83-69 | -4.5 | W +9.5 | 142.5 | O 152 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
6
@SMU
SMUL 58-69
+12.5
8
@TAR
TARL 77-85
−4.5
11
@KU
KUL 46-77
−5.5
16
@OKST
OKSTL 69-85
+4.5
28
@XAV
XAVL 67-88
−7.5
6
@LAM
LAMW 57-49
+11.5
17
@SFA
SFAL 60-69
−2.5
29
vsNICH
NICHL 71-76
−10.5
31
vsNOLA
NOLAW 83-69
+9.5
covered 4didn’t cover 5avg +0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
6
@SMU
SMUL 58-69
−33.5
8
@TAR
TARL 77-85
+19.5
11
@KU
KUL 46-77
−22.5
16
@OKST
OKSTL 69-85
−0.5
28
@XAV
XAVL 67-88
+8.5
6
@LAM
LAMW 57-49
−30.5
17
@SFA
SFAL 60-69
−10.5
29
vsNICH
NICHL 71-76
+9.5
31
vsNOLA
NOLAW 83-69
+9.5
over 4under 5avg −5.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
UT Rio Grande
11 games played
Straight up
3-8
27% wins
Against the spread
5-6
45% covers · avg +2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
4-7
36% overs · avg −6.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ BAY | L 81-96 | +24.5 | W +9.5 | 154.5 | O 177 |
| Nov 8 | @ SUU | W 95-72 | -1.5 | W +21.5 | 160.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 11 | @ BOIS | L 65-85 | +16.5 | L −3.5 | 161.5 | U 150 |
| Nov 22 | @ MOST | L 67-74 | +3.5 | L −3.5 | 149.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 24 | @ ILL | L 73-87 | +33.5 | W +19.5 | 164.5 | U 160 |
| Dec 3 | @SFA | L 60-73 | +6.5 | L −6.5 | 143.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 7 | vs APSU | W 63-50 | -2.5 | W +10.5 | 151.5 | U 113 |
| Dec 11 | vs UTA | L 50-58 | -4.5 | L −12.5 | 145.5 | U 108 |
| Dec 16 | @LAM | W 83-72 | +3.5 | W +14.5 | 139.5 | O 155 |
| Dec 29 | vsNOLA | L 69-85 | -6.5 | L −22.5 | 152.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 31 | vsNICH | L 69-71 | -3.5 | L −5.5 | 145.5 | U 140 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@BAY
BAYL 81-96
+9.5
8
@SUU
SUUW 95-72
+21.5
11
@BOIS
BOISL 65-85
−3.5
22
@MOST
MOSTL 67-74
−3.5
24
@ILL
ILLL 73-87
+19.5
3
@SFA
SFAL 60-73
−6.5
7
vsAPSU
APSUW 63-50
+10.5
11
vsUTA
UTAL 50-58
−12.5
16
@LAM
LAMW 83-72
+14.5
29
vsNOLA
NOLAL 69-85
−22.5
31
vsNICH
NICHL 69-71
−5.5
covered 5didn’t cover 6avg +2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@BAY
BAYL 81-96
+22.5
8
@SUU
SUUW 95-72
+6.5
11
@BOIS
BOISL 65-85
−11.5
22
@MOST
MOSTL 67-74
−8.5
24
@ILL
ILLL 73-87
−4.5
3
@SFA
SFAL 60-73
−10.5
7
vsAPSU
APSUW 63-50
−38.5
11
vsUTA
UTAL 50-58
−37.5
16
@LAM
LAMW 83-72
+15.5
29
vsNOLA
NOLAL 69-85
+1.5
31
vsNICH
NICHL 69-71
−5.5
over 4under 7avg −6.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Texas A&M-CC
2-7 overall · 2-2 in conference · Southland Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs LSU N Orleans83–69
- Lvs Nicholls71–76
- L@ SF Austin60–69
- W@ Lamar57–49
- L@ Xavier67–88
3 days since their last game.
UT Rio Grande
3-8 overall · 1-3 in conference · Southland Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Nicholls69–71
- Lvs LSU N Orleans69–85
- W@ Lamar83–72
- Lvs UT Arlington50–58
- Wvs Austin Peay63–50
3 days since their last game.