NCAAF 1st half2026 Week 4: 58 of 58 games final. Favorites went 34-22 against the first-half spread, and halftime totals went 27 over, 31 under.How 1st-half lines work ⓘ
FinalCurrentUpcomingFull-game view of Week 4 ›
Sort by
⌨ Shortcuts

Group the list

Sort by
No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.

Jump to

Thursday, Sep 24

1
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
1H ATS 1-2 · #67
10
1H ATS 1-2 · #116
17
1H spread
LIB -1.5
✓ CCU W ATS
1H total
26.5
▲ Over 27
Projected
14–12
✗ LIB did not lead
Model: LIB by 0.5 ✗ Model: Under 0.5 ✗

Friday, Sep 25

4
1H finalConf · est. line
Army
1H ATS 2-0 · #78
7
1H ATS 3-0 · #104
7
1H spread
ARMY -2.5
✓ TEM W ATS
1H total
25
▼ Under 14
Projected
13–12
 
Model: TEM by 2 ✓
1H finalConf · est. line
Navy
1H ATS 0-2 · #89
13
UAB
1H ATS 1-2 · #107
17
1H spread
NAVY -4
✓ UAB W ATS
1H total
26.5
▲ Over 30
Projected
14–13
✗ NAVY did not lead
Model: UAB by 2.5 ✓ Model: Over 1 ✓
1H finalConf · est. line
1H ATS 1-1 · #30
0
1H ATS 1-2 · #7
12
1H spread
IU -12
Push
1H total
25.5
▼ Under 12
Projected
5–20
✓ IU led
Model: IU by 3
1H finalConf · est. line
1H ATS 0-3 · #52
10
1H ATS 0-3 · #85
7
1H spread
CLEM -1.5
✓ CLEM W ATS
1H total
27.5
▼ Under 17
Projected
14–13
✓ CLEM led
Trend: Fast starter edge: CAL ✗ Model: CAL by 0.5 ✗ Model: Under 1 ✓

Saturday, Sep 26

53
1H finalConf · est. line
1H ATS 1-2 · #8
10
1H ATS 1-2 · #11
3
1H spread
TEX -3
✓ TEX W ATS
1H total
28.5
▼ Under 13
Projected
16–14
✓ TEX led
Trend: Fast starter edge: TENN ✗ Model: TENN by 1 ✗ Model: Over 1 ✗
1H finalConf · est. line
1H ATS 1-2 · #53
10
1H ATS 2-1 · #2
28
1H spread
OSU -15
✓ OSU W ATS
1H total
28
▲ Over 38
Projected
7–21
✓ OSU led
Trend: Fast starter edge: ILL ✗ Model: ILL by 0.5 ✗
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
1H ATS 3-0 · #124
14
1H ATS 0-3 · #15
21
1H spread
TTU -20.5
✓ SHSU W ATS
1H total
29
▲ Over 35
Projected
4–23
✓ TTU led
Trend: Fast starter edge: SHSU ✓ Model: SHSU by 1 ✓ Model: Under 2.5 ✗
1H finalConf · est. line
1H ATS 2-1 · #20
24
1H ATS 0-2-1 · #22
21
1H spread
LOU -7
✓ WAKE W ATS
1H total
30
▲ Over 45
Projected
11–19
✗ LOU did not lead
Trend: Fast starter edge: WAKE ✓ Model: LOU by 0.5 ✗
1H finalConf · est. line
1H ATS 2-1 · #63
3
1H ATS 3-0 · #38
10
1H spread
BAY -5
✓ BAY W ATS
1H total
28.5
▼ Under 13
Projected
11–17
✓ BAY led
Model: BAY by 1 ✓ Model: Under 1 ✓
1H finalConf · est. line
1H ATS 3-0 · #45
3
1H ATS 1-2 · #79
0
1H spread
VT -8.5
✓ BC W ATS
1H total
23.5
▼ Under 3
Projected
17–8
✓ VT led
Model: Over 1.5 ✗
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
1H ATS 2-1 · #108
3
1H ATS 1-2 · #75
17
1H spread
TOL -1.5
✓ TOL W ATS
1H total
26.5
▼ Under 20
Projected
11–15
✓ TOL led
Model: TOL by 3 ✓ Model: Under 1 ✓
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
1H ATS 2-1 · #110
21
UTSA
1H ATS 2-1 · #71
35
1H spread
UTSA -8.5
✓ UTSA W ATS
1H total
29.5
▲ Over 56
Projected
12–18
✓ UTSA led
Trend: Fast starter edge: CSU ✗ Model: CSU by 1.5 ✗ Model: Over 0.5 ✓
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
UNLV
1H ATS 2-1 · #84
14
1H ATS 0-3 · #133
10
1H spread
UNLV -8
✓ AKR W ATS
1H total
27.5
▼ Under 24
Projected
16–10
✓ UNLV led
Model: AKR by 2 ✓ Model: Under 2 ✓
1H finalConf · est. line
1H ATS 2-1 · #132
0
1H ATS 0-3 · #131
17
1H spread
KENT -1.5
✓ KENT W ATS
1H total
27
▼ Under 17
Projected
14–15
✓ KENT led
Trend: Fast starter edge: BALL ✗ Model: BALL by 0.5 ✗ Model: Over 2 ✗
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
1H ATS 3-0 · #101
21
1H ATS 3-0 · #26
24
1H spread
UK -12
✓ USA W ATS
1H total
28.5
▲ Over 45
Projected
8–20
✓ UK led
Trend: Fast starter edge: USA ✓ Model: UK by 0.5 ✗ Model: Under 1 ✗
1H finalConf · est. line
UCLA
1H ATS 1-2 · #16
20
1H ATS 2-1 · #72
3
1H spread
UCLA -1.5
✓ UCLA W ATS
1H total
29
▼ Under 23
Projected
13–15
✗ MD did not lead
Trend: Fast starter edge: MD ✗ Model: MD by 3.5 ✗ Model: Under 1 ✓
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
1H ATS 1-2 · #1
35
1H ATS 1-2 · #59
0
1H spread
ND -16
✓ ND W ATS
1H total
30
▲ Over 35
Projected
24–7
✓ ND led
Trend: Fast starter edge: PUR ✗ Model: ND by 1 ✓ Model: Over 1.5 ✓
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
1H ATS 1-2 · #134
14
1H ATS 3-0 · #91
21
1H spread
GAST -5
✓ GAST W ATS
1H total
29.5
▲ Over 35
Projected
10–18
✓ GAST led
Trend: Fast starter edge: GAST ✓ Model: GAST by 3 ✓ Model: Under 1.5 ✗
1H finalConf · est. line
1H ATS 1-2 · #118
3
1H ATS 0-3 · #122
13
1H spread
HAW -1.5
✓ WYO W ATS
1H total
23
▼ Under 16
Projected
10–13
✓ WYO led
Model: WYO by 4 ✓ Model: Under 0.5 ✓
1H finalConf · est. line
1H ATS 1-2 · #23
0
1H ATS 3-0 · #4
28
1H spread
UGA -7
✓ UGA W ATS
1H total
22.5
▲ Over 28
Projected
8–15
✓ UGA led
Trend: Fast starter edge: UGA ✓ Model: UGA by 0.5 ✓ Model: Over 0.5 ✓
1H finalConf · est. line
1H ATS 2-0-1 · #12
6
1H ATS 3-0 · #17
17
1H spread
FLA -2.5
✓ FLA W ATS
1H total
30.5
▼ Under 23
Projected
16–17
✓ FLA led
Model: MISS by 2 ✗ Model: Over 2.5 ✗
1H finalConf · est. line
Utah
1H ATS 3-0 · #10
24
1H ATS 3-0 · #50
3
1H spread
UTAH -4.5
✓ UTAH W ATS
1H total
24
▲ Over 27
Projected
15–10
✓ UTAH led
Model: UTAH by 1 ✓ Model: Over 1 ✓
1H finalConf · est. line
Iowa
1H ATS 2-1 · #27
7
1H ATS 1-2 · #34
10
1H spread
MICH -2.5
✓ MICH W ATS
1H total
20.5
▼ Under 17
Projected
10–12
✓ MICH led
Trend: Fast starter edge: IOWA ✗ Model: IOWA by 0.5 ✗ Model: Over 1.5 ✗
1H finalConf · est. line
TCU
1H ATS 0-3 · #36
10
UCF
1H ATS 1-2 · #55
14
1H spread
TCU -2
✓ UCF W ATS
1H total
25
▼ Under 24
Projected
13–12
✗ TCU did not lead
Model: UCF by 1 ✓
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
1H ATS 1-2 · #37
15
1H ATS 3-0 · #88
0
1H spread
BOIS -5
✓ BOIS W ATS
1H total
26.5
▼ Under 15
Projected
14–11
✓ BOIS led
Trend: Fast starter edge: WMU ✗ Model: WMU by 2 ✗ Model: Under 1 ✓
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
1H ATS 2-1 · #93
14
1H ATS 2-1 · #106
14
1H spread
M-OH -1.5
✓ CONN W ATS
1H total
27.5
▲ Over 28
Projected
14–15
 
Model: CONN by 0.5 ✓ Model: Over 2 ✓
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
1H ATS 3-0 · #56
14
1H ATS 1-2 · #119
3
1H spread
UNM -7
✓ UNM W ATS
1H total
24.5
▼ Under 17
Projected
17–8
✓ UNM led
Trend: Fast starter edge: UNM ✓ Model: UNM by 2 ✓ Model: Over 0.5 ✗
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
1H ATS 2-1 · #21
28
1H ATS 3-0 · #82
14
1H spread
HOU -10.5
✓ HOU W ATS
1H total
29.5
▲ Over 42
Projected
19–10
✓ HOU led
Trend: Fast starter edge: GASO ✗ Model: GASO by 1 ✗ Model: Under 1 ✗
1H finalConf · est. line
1H ATS 0-3 · #60
3
1H ATS 0-2-1 · #25
14
1H spread
AUB -6
✓ AUB W ATS
1H total
28.5
▼ Under 17
Projected
13–16
✓ AUB led
Model: VAN by 2.5 ✗ Model: Over 0.5 ✗
1H finalConf · est. line
1H ATS 2-1 · #33
7
1H ATS 2-1 · #32
17
1H spread
PSU -5.5
✓ PSU W ATS
1H total
22.5
▲ Over 24
Projected
7–16
✓ PSU led
Model: PSU by 3.5 ✓ Model: Over 0.5 ✓
1H finalConf · est. line
1H ATS 2-1 · #13
24
1H ATS 2-1 · #69
10
1H spread
NEB -3.5
✓ NEB W ATS
1H total
25
▲ Over 34
Projected
15–11
✓ NEB led
Model: Over 1 ✓
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
1H ATS 0-3 · #76
0
1H ATS 0-3 · #129
6
1H spread
USF -10.5
✓ BGSU W ATS
1H total
25
▼ Under 6
Projected
19–8
✗ USF did not lead
Model: USF by 1 ✗ Model: Over 2 ✗
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
1H ATS 2-1 · #113
3
1H ATS 1-2 · #49
28
1H spread
UVA -11.5
✓ UVA W ATS
1H total
27.5
▲ Over 31
Projected
7–19
✓ UVA led
Trend: Fast starter edge: DEL ✗ Model: UVA by 0.5 ✓ Model: Under 1.5 ✗
1H finalConf · est. line
1H ATS 3-0 · #51
30
1H ATS 1-2 · #112
17
1H spread
JMU -4
✓ JMU W ATS
1H total
23
▲ Over 47
Projected
12–10
✓ JMU led
Trend: Fast starter edge: JMU ✓ Model: ODU by 1.5 ✗ Model: Under 0.5 ✗
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
1H ATS 1-2 · #120
3
1H ATS 3-0 · #3
35
1H spread
MIA -24.5
✓ MIA W ATS
1H total
27.5
▲ Over 38
Projected
0–25
✓ MIA led
Trend: Fast starter edge: CMU ✗ Model: MIA by 1 ✓ Model: Under 2 ✗
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
1H ATS 2-0-1 · #81
10
1H ATS 1-2 · #135
7
1H spread
UL -5.5
✓ CLT W ATS
1H total
25.5
▼ Under 17
Projected
16–11
✓ UL led
Model: CLT by 1 ✓ Model: Over 1 ✗
1H finalConf · est. line
1H ATS 1-2 · #41
17
1H ATS 1-2 · #64
10
1H spread
KSU -3.5
✓ KSU W ATS
1H total
29
▼ Under 27
Projected
16–14
✓ KSU led
Model: CIN by 1 ✗ Model: Over 0.5 ✗
1H finalConf · est. line
1H ATS 1-2 · #44
13
1H ATS 3-0 · #73
14
1H spread
WVU -1
Push
1H total
31.5
▼ Under 27
Projected
14–16
✓ WVU led
Model: WVU by 1 Model: Under 2 ✓
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
1H ATS 1-1-1 · #127
14
1H ATS 1-2 · #86
14
1H spread
TULN -10.5
✓ USM W ATS
1H total
27.5
▲ Over 28
Projected
8–18
 
Trend: Fast starter edge: USM ✓ Model: USM by 1 ✓ Model: Under 1.5 ✗
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
1H ATS 2-1 · #117
7
1H ATS 2-1 · #103
7
1H spread
ARST -4
✓ KENN W ATS
1H total
28
▼ Under 14
Projected
12–15
 
Trend: Fast starter edge: KENN ✓ Model: KENN by 1.5 ✓ Model: Under 1 ✓
1H finalConf · est. line
1H ATS 3-0 · #126
7
1H ATS 2-2 · #99
10
1H spread
JXST -4
✓ MTSU W ATS
1H total
26.5
▼ Under 17
Projected
10–16
✓ JXST led
Trend: Fast starter edge: MTSU ✓ Model: JXST by 2 ✗ Model: Under 0.5 ✓
1H finalConf · est. line
1H ATS 2-1 · #28
10
1H ATS 1-2 · #5
35
1H spread
ALA -7.5
✓ ALA W ATS
1H total
28
▲ Over 45
Projected
9–19
✓ ALA led
Trend: Fast starter edge: SC ✗ Model: ALA by 3 ✓
1H finalConf · est. line
1H ATS 0-3 · #24
3
LSU
1H ATS 1-2 · #6
14
1H spread
LSU -5
✓ LSU W ATS
1H total
27.5
▼ Under 17
Projected
12–15
✓ LSU led
Trend: Fast starter edge: TA&M ✗ Model: TA&M by 2.5 ✗
1H finalConf · est. line
1H ATS 1-2 · #9
13
USC
1H ATS 2-1-1 · #18
10
1H spread
ORE -2
✓ ORE W ATS
1H total
31.5
▼ Under 23
Projected
17–15
✓ ORE led
Trend: Fast starter edge: USC ✗ Model: USC by 0.5 ✗ Model: Over 0.5 ✗
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
1H ATS 2-1 · #31
14
1H ATS 2-1 · #100
17
1H spread
ARIZ -7
✓ WSU W ATS
1H total
24.5
▲ Over 31
Projected
16–9
✗ ARIZ did not lead
Model: WSU by 0.5 ✓ Model: Over 1 ✓
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
Troy
1H ATS 2-1 · #98
10
1H ATS 1-2 · #95
7
1H spread
USU -2
✓ TROY W ATS
1H total
24.5
▼ Under 17
Projected
11–13
✗ USU did not lead
Trend: Fast starter edge: TROY ✓ Model: USU by 0.5 ✗
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
1H ATS 2-1 · #94
10
1H ATS 2-1 · #61
28
1H spread
NCSU -7.5
✓ NCSU W ATS
1H total
29.5
▲ Over 38
Projected
10–18
✓ NCSU led
Trend: Fast starter edge: APP ✗ Model: NCSU by 0.5 ✓ Model: Under 1 ✗
1H finalConf · est. line
1H ATS 1-2 · #19
10
1H ATS 2-1 · #29
14
1H spread
MSST -2
✓ MSST W ATS
1H total
30.5
▼ Under 24
Projected
14–16
✓ MSST led
Model: MIZ by 0.5 ✗ Model: Under 0.5 ✓
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
1H ATS 1-2 · #87
0
1H ATS 0-3 · #57
16
1H spread
ARK -4
✓ ARK W ATS
1H total
27
▼ Under 16
Projected
11–16
✓ ARK led
Trend: Fast starter edge: TLSA ✗ Model: ARK by 1 ✓ Model: Over 0.5 ✗
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
1H ATS 1-1-1 · #102
35
1H ATS 1-2 · #137
17
1H spread
FAU -7
✓ FAU W ATS
1H total
30.5
▲ Over 52
Projected
18–13
✓ FAU led
Model: ULM by 2 ✗ Model: Over 0.5 ✓
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
1H ATS 2-1 · #130
10
SMU
1H ATS 3-0 · #35
14
1H spread
SMU -18
✓ MOST W ATS
1H total
31.5
▼ Under 24
Projected
5–24
✓ SMU led
Trend: Fast starter edge: MOST ✓ Model: SMU by 0.5 ✗ Model: Under 3 ✓
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
1H ATS 3-0 · #48
20
UTEP
1H ATS 1-2 · #136
0
1H spread
ORST -7
✓ ORST W ATS
1H total
29.5
▼ Under 20
Projected
17–13
✓ ORST led
Model: UTEP by 3 ✗
1H finalConf · est. line
1H ATS 2-1 · #123
21
1H ATS 1-3 · #138
6
1H spread
MASS -3.5
✓ MASS W ATS
1H total
25.5
▲ Over 27
Projected
14–12
✓ MASS led
Trend: Fast starter edge: MASS ✓ Model: SAC by 1.5 ✗ Model: Over 1 ✓
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
Rice
1H ATS 1-2 · #121
17
1H ATS 2-1 · #80
14
1H spread
FRES -7.5
✓ RICE W ATS
1H total
22.5
▲ Over 31
Projected
6–16
✗ FRES did not lead
Model: FRES by 2 ✗ Model: Under 0.5 ✗
1H finalConf · est. line
1H ATS 0-3 · #68
20
1H ATS 1-2 · #97
10
1H spread
GT -2
✓ GT W ATS
1H total
25
▲ Over 30
Projected
14–12
✓ GT led
Model: GT by 1 ✓ Model: Over 1 ✓
1H finalConf · est. line
1H ATS 1-1 · #90
10
1H ATS 1-2 · #109
10
1H spread
AFA -2.5
✓ NEV W ATS
1H total
26.5
▼ Under 20
Projected
13–14
 
Model: NEV by 3 ✓
1H finalConf · est. line
1H ATS 2-1 · #65
21
1H ATS 0-3 · #42
10
1H spread
WASH -7.5
✓ MINN W ATS
1H total
23
▲ Over 31
Projected
8–16
✗ WASH did not lead
Trend: Fast starter edge: MINN ✓ Model: WASH by 0.5 ✗ Model: Over 1 ✓
Loading…
StatusMatchup1H spreadMove1H totalModelTrendDetails
Loading…
1H ATS: the team's 1st-half margin plus its 1st-half line. Away team listed first. Spread edge = the model's 1st-half line minus the 1H spread (Total edge: the model's 1H total minus the 1H total), in points; a lean starts at 2 pts (3 on the total) and is context only. Projections use only games played before that week. Trends use each team's 1st halves earlier this season; dot = backtest status ( proven edge, above break-even but not proven, no edge). est. lines are estimated from the full-game line.
1H ATS leans (backtest)
1117-1157 (49.1%)
No edge 2016–26 · break-even 52.4%
1H O/U leans (backtest)
313-299 (51.1%)
No edge 3+ pt edges
Halftime leader picked
69.7%
7,953 games, walk-forward
This week
34-22 fav 1H ATS
O/U 27-31 · leans 9-6 ATS, 1-0 O/U

2026 team 1st-half records

Against the 1st-half line (real or estimated), halftime over/under and halftime leads
TeamGP1H ATSCover %1H O-ULed-trailed1H PF1H PA1H margin
Oregon State 7 7-0 100% 4-3 5-2 24.1 9.6 +14.6
Kansas 6 5-0-1 100% 3-2-1 2-3-1 17.5 10.5 +7.0
Ohio State 7 6-1 85.7% 4-3 7-0 24.1 5.6 +18.6
Georgia Southern 7 6-1 85.7% 2-4-1 5-2 16.0 11.0 +5.0
South Alabama 7 6-1 85.7% 5-2 4-2-1 21.1 14.3 +6.9
NC State 6 5-1 83.3% 2-4 5-1 20.2 8.5 +11.7
Utah 6 5-1 83.3% 4-2 6-0 24.0 5.0 +19.0
Georgia State 6 5-1 83.3% 5-1 5-1 23.2 13.7 +9.5
Miami 6 5-1 83.3% 4-2 5-0-1 27.8 6.0 +21.8
Syracuse 6 5-1 83.3% 3-2-1 4-2 21.7 12.2 +9.5
Baylor 6 5-1 83.3% 3-3 4-2 16.8 7.2 +9.7
New Mexico 6 5-1 83.3% 1-5 4-2 18.3 4.5 +13.8
Ole Miss 6 4-1-1 80% 2-4 5-1 21.7 6.0 +15.7
James Madison 8 6-2 75% 4-4 7-1 25.1 8.8 +16.4
UNLV 7 5-2 71.4% 2-5 5-1-1 13.3 9.6 +3.7
Wake Forest 7 5-2 71.4% 5-1-1 5-2 21.3 10.7 +10.6
Houston 7 5-2 71.4% 3-4 6-1 21.1 7.3 +13.9
Nebraska 7 5-2 71.4% 4-3 7-0 19.3 7.0 +12.3
Ball State 7 5-2 71.4% 3-4 1-5-1 9.3 18.1 -8.9
Pittsburgh 7 5-2 71.4% 4-2-1 5-2 19.7 9.9 +9.9
Kentucky 7 5-2 71.4% 5-2 4-2-1 16.3 13.6 +2.7
Temple 7 5-2 71.4% 3-4 4-2-1 14.1 11.3 +2.9
Penn State 7 5-2 71.4% 4-3 5-1-1 16.0 8.1 +7.9
Missouri State 7 5-2 71.4% 2-5 2-5 13.4 14.6 -1.1
Western Michigan 7 5-2 71.4% 1-5-1 4-3 12.3 7.1 +5.1
Virginia Tech 7 5-2 71.4% 4-3 7-0 24.4 7.7 +16.7
Florida 7 5-2 71.4% 3-2-2 4-3 21.4 13.4 +8.0
Middle Tennessee 7 5-2 71.4% 1-6 2-4-1 10.9 12.1 -1.3
Florida International 7 4-2-1 66.7% 2-5 3-3-1 11.0 8.3 +2.7
North Carolina 6 4-2 66.7% 1-3-2 4-2 14.7 9.0 +5.7
UCF 6 4-2 66.7% 3-3 3-2-1 17.2 11.2 +6.0
North Texas 6 4-2 66.7% 3-2-1 3-2-1 23.2 16.0 +7.2
UConn 6 4-2 66.7% 5-1 3-2-1 20.2 13.5 +6.7
Army 6 4-2 66.7% 2-4 4-1-1 16.8 8.0 +8.8
South Carolina 6 4-2 66.7% 4-2 5-1 19.3 12.0 +7.3
Iowa State 6 4-2 66.7% 4-2 3-2-1 16.7 12.7 +4.0
Texas State 6 4-2 66.7% 4-2 4-1-1 26.0 16.2 +9.8
Boston College 6 4-2 66.7% 2-4 3-3 10.5 9.2 +1.3
Duke 6 4-2 66.7% 3-2-1 3-3 16.7 11.5 +5.2
Troy 6 4-2 66.7% 4-2 3-2-1 17.2 13.0 +4.2
Louisiana Tech 6 4-2 66.7% 2-4 3-2-1 17.3 8.3 +9.0
BYU 6 4-2 66.7% 4-2 4-1-1 21.5 7.3 +14.2
Arizona 6 4-2 66.7% 4-2 5-1 19.0 9.7 +9.3
UCLA 6 4-2 66.7% 2-4 5-0-1 14.7 7.8 +6.8
Boise State 6 3-2-1 60% 5-1 5-1 20.5 13.0 +7.5
Auburn 6 3-2-1 60% 3-3 5-1 15.3 9.2 +6.2
Florida Atlantic 6 3-2-1 60% 5-1 4-2 25.5 19.0 +6.5
Nevada 6 3-2-1 60% 2-4 2-2-2 10.8 11.7 -0.8
North Dakota State 7 4-3 57.1% 3-3-1 6-0-1 19.0 5.9 +13.1
Florida State 7 4-3 57.1% 1-6 3-2-2 16.7 13.1 +3.6
Massachusetts 7 4-3 57.1% 4-3 5-2 16.1 8.0 +8.1
Kennesaw State 7 4-3 57.1% 2-5 3-3-1 11.3 11.9 -0.6
Alabama 7 4-3 57.1% 5-2 5-2 23.4 13.4 +10.0
Coastal Carolina 7 4-3 57.1% 3-4 4-3 15.1 12.4 +2.7
Ohio 7 4-3 57.1% 5-2 4-3 16.6 9.3 +7.3
Liberty 7 4-3 57.1% 3-4 4-3 14.9 9.6 +5.3
Miami (OH) 7 4-3 57.1% 5-2 4-2-1 19.3 11.3 +8.0
Georgia 7 4-3 57.1% 5-2 5-2 25.4 8.1 +17.3
UTSA 7 4-3 57.1% 4-3 4-3 17.6 15.4 +2.1
Tulsa 7 4-3 57.1% 2-5 5-2 13.1 10.6 +2.6
Arkansas State 7 4-3 57.1% 2-5 3-3-1 15.1 13.9 +1.3
Sam Houston 7 4-3 57.1% 4-3 2-4-1 12.7 11.9 +0.9
Maryland 7 4-3 57.1% 5-2 3-4 17.7 18.0 -0.3
LSU 7 4-3 57.1% 4-3 5-2 19.3 8.3 +11.0
Western Kentucky 7 4-3 57.1% 3-4 3-4 11.6 16.1 -4.6
Washington State 7 4-3 57.1% 2-5 3-3-1 10.0 12.0 -2.0
Eastern Michigan 8 4-4 50% 3-4-1 3-5 11.9 14.6 -2.8
Fresno State 7 3-3-1 50% 5-2 2-4-1 12.6 13.9 -1.3
West Virginia 7 3-3-1 50% 4-3 4-3 18.9 13.3 +5.6
Louisiana 7 3-3-1 50% 2-5 4-3 15.0 9.3 +5.7
Colorado 6 3-3 50% 1-5 2-4 9.8 11.8 -2.0
Minnesota 6 3-3 50% 3-3 3-3 15.3 13.2 +2.2
Air Force 6 3-3 50% 2-4 3-2-1 14.0 10.8 +3.2
Texas 6 3-3 50% 2-3-1 5-1 15.8 8.3 +7.5
Iowa 6 3-3 50% 3-3 3-2-1 20.8 6.7 +14.2
Michigan 6 3-3 50% 1-5 5-1 9.7 6.2 +3.5
Mississippi State 6 3-3 50% 4-2 3-3 19.0 15.2 +3.8
Wisconsin 6 3-3 50% 3-3 3-3 14.7 9.3 +5.3
SMU 6 3-3 50% 2-4 6-0 19.3 9.0 +10.3
San José State 7 3-4 42.9% 0-7 5-2 7.7 7.6 +0.1
Virginia 7 3-4 42.9% 3-4 3-4 15.9 10.6 +5.3
Hawai'i 7 3-4 42.9% 1-6 2-5 6.9 12.1 -5.3
New Mexico State 7 3-4 42.9% 3-4 3-4 11.9 12.9 -1.0
Delaware 7 3-4 42.9% 4-3 4-3 13.7 16.6 -2.9
Missouri 7 3-4 42.9% 3-3-1 4-2-1 17.3 11.3 +6.0
UAB 7 3-4 42.9% 2-5 2-5 10.9 15.7 -4.9
Purdue 7 3-4 42.9% 3-3-1 3-4 13.9 16.6 -2.7
Michigan State 7 3-4 42.9% 3-3-1 3-4 11.0 14.6 -3.6
Toledo 7 3-4 42.9% 4-3 4-3 17.0 11.3 +5.7
East Carolina 7 3-4 42.9% 3-4 4-3 15.1 12.0 +3.1
Bowling Green 7 3-4 42.9% 2-5 3-3-1 8.1 15.1 -7.0
Charlotte 7 3-4 42.9% 1-6 1-6 6.4 19.3 -12.9
App State 7 3-4 42.9% 3-4 3-3-1 13.6 11.9 +1.7
Arkansas 7 3-4 42.9% 3-4 2-4-1 8.1 13.6 -5.4
Wyoming 7 3-4 42.9% 1-6 2-5 7.4 10.6 -3.1
Rice 7 3-4 42.9% 3-4 2-5 9.7 16.7 -7.0
San Diego State 7 3-4 42.9% 3-4 2-4-1 8.3 15.3 -7.0
Notre Dame 7 3-4 42.9% 5-1-1 6-1 25.0 7.9 +17.1
Southern Miss 6 2-3-1 40% 4-2 1-4-1 10.5 19.7 -9.2
Northwestern 6 2-3-1 40% 2-4 4-2 16.0 8.8 +7.2
Arizona State 6 2-3-1 40% 3-2-1 3-3 18.2 17.3 +0.8
USC 7 2-4-1 33.3% 4-3 4-2-1 20.4 9.7 +10.7
Indiana 7 2-4-1 33.3% 1-5-1 5-2 17.7 3.7 +14.0
TCU 6 2-4 33.3% 1-5 3-2-1 12.7 8.8 +3.8
Rutgers 6 2-4 33.3% 4-2 1-5 13.7 19.5 -5.8
Georgia Tech 6 2-4 33.3% 3-3 4-2 13.5 13.0 +0.5
Illinois 6 2-4 33.3% 5-1 4-2 18.8 15.3 +3.5
Oregon 6 2-4 33.3% 3-3 2-4 16.5 11.3 +5.2
Cincinnati 6 2-4 33.3% 3-3 3-3 12.7 13.2 -0.5
Tulane 6 2-4 33.3% 3-3 2-3-1 10.7 11.3 -0.7
Colorado State 6 2-4 33.3% 5-1 2-4 20.8 28.8 -8.0
Kansas State 6 2-4 33.3% 3-3 5-1 18.0 11.3 +6.7
UL Monroe 6 2-4 33.3% 4-2 1-4-1 10.7 23.5 -12.8
Clemson 6 2-4 33.3% 2-3-1 3-3 12.5 13.2 -0.7
Jacksonville State 7 2-5 28.6% 5-1-1 3-3-1 15.7 14.6 +1.1
Akron 7 2-5 28.6% 3-3-1 2-5 8.9 17.6 -8.7
Buffalo 7 2-5 28.6% 4-2-1 3-3-1 10.7 14.9 -4.1
Kent State 7 2-5 28.6% 4-3 1-6 6.1 17.1 -11.0
Marshall 7 2-5 28.6% 2-5 3-3-1 11.1 17.9 -6.7
Tennessee 7 2-5 28.6% 1-6 5-2 14.0 5.7 +8.3
Old Dominion 7 2-5 28.6% 4-2-1 2-4-1 9.6 17.9 -8.3
Texas A&M 7 2-5 28.6% 1-5-1 4-2-1 14.4 6.9 +7.6
Central Michigan 7 2-5 28.6% 3-4 2-5 5.9 16.7 -10.9
Washington 7 2-5 28.6% 4-3 5-2 14.6 13.1 +1.4
Memphis 8 2-6 25% 4-4 4-4 14.9 13.4 +1.5
Oklahoma State 6 1-4-1 20% 2-4 2-3-1 15.8 12.7 +3.2
UTEP 7 1-5-1 16.7% 2-4-1 1-6 6.0 16.4 -10.4
Oklahoma 6 1-5 16.7% 2-3-1 3-3 8.5 11.3 -2.8
Navy 6 1-5 16.7% 5-1 1-5 14.2 19.2 -5.0
Northern Illinois 6 1-5 16.7% 5-1 0-6 9.0 22.8 -13.8
Texas Tech 6 1-5 16.7% 3-3 4-2 18.7 9.7 +9.0
Utah State 6 1-5 16.7% 1-5 0-6 6.2 17.7 -11.5
Sacramento State 7 1-6 14.3% 6-1 1-6 7.6 20.9 -13.3
Stanford 7 1-6 14.3% 4-3 2-5 7.7 19.3 -11.6
Vanderbilt 7 1-6 14.3% 4-3 1-5-1 10.0 19.1 -9.1
South Florida 7 1-6 14.3% 2-5 4-3 10.1 8.4 +1.7
California 7 1-6 14.3% 4-3 1-6 12.4 17.9 -5.4
Louisville 7 0-6-1 0% 4-3 2-4-1 17.3 15.9 +1.4

How it works

Halftime scores come from ESPN quarter scores (Q1 + Q2) for every game since 2015.

1st-half lines. ESPN publishes no college 1st-half lines. Real ones come from The Odds API’s US books (DraftKings first) for games kicking off within about five days (the biggest matchups first, a capped number a day), pulled once, so a line shows the time it was fetched; every other game, and every past college game, is estimated from the full-game closing line (spread × 0.59, total × 0.52, rounded to the half point: the share of the margin and points college teams score before halftime). A real line shows its book; an estimated one is marked “est.”

Projection. The full-game model's margin and total, scaled the same way. The blend was chosen by the lowest walk-forward error.

Spread edge and Total edge. The model’s 1st-half line (total) minus the market’s, in points. A lean starts when the projection beats the 1H line by 2–6 pts (ATS) or 3+ pts (O/U). Shown for context: neither has a proven edge.

Picks and prices. For a game with a posted 1st-half line, tap Pick on its tile to save a 1H spread or total pick (graded on the halftime score; they show in My picks). The game card’s Market tab lists every book’s 1st-half price.

NCAAF first-half betting FAQ

First-half lines, 1H ATS and halftime totals explained

What is a first-half spread in the NCAAF?

A first-half (1H) spread is a point spread graded on the score at halftime only. A team covers the 1st-half spread when its 1st-half margin plus its 1st-half line is positive; the 2nd half and overtime don't count.

How are NCAAF first-half lines set here?

ESPN publishes no college 1st-half lines. Real ones come from The Odds API’s US books (DraftKings first) for games kicking off within about five days (the biggest matchups first, a capped number a day), pulled once, so a line shows the time it was fetched; every other game, and every past college game, is estimated from the full-game closing line (spread × 0.59, total × 0.52, rounded to the half point: the share of the margin and points college teams score before halftime).

How is the 1st-half projection made?

The full-game power-rating model's margin and total are scaled to the first half. Every past week is predicted only from games played before it.

Do the 1st-half leans beat the market?

Not so far. Over 2016–26, 1st-half ATS leans went 1117-1157 (49.1%) and over/under leans 313-299 (51.1%), below or near the 52.4% needed to break even at -110 odds, so they are shown as context only.

How often does the model pick the team leading at halftime?

69.7% of 7,953 NCAAF games in the 2016–26 walk-forward backtest.