NCAAF 1st half2023 Week 1: 53 of 53 games final. Favorites went 25-27 against the first-half spread, and halftime totals went 7 over, 14 under.How 1st-half lines work ⓘ
FinalCurrentUpcomingFull-game view of Week 1 ›
Sort by
⌨ Shortcuts

Group the list

Sort by
No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.

Jump to

Saturday, Aug 26

7
1H finalNeutral · est. line
Navy
1H ATS — · #108
0
1H ATS — · #6
28
1H spread
ND -12
✓ ND W ATS
1H total
—
 
Projected
14–14
 
Model: NAVY by 12 ✗
1H finalConf · est. line
UTEP
1H ATS — · #115
7
1H ATS — · #69
10
1H spread
UTEP -1
✓ JXST W ATS
1H total
28.5
▼ Under 17
Projected
13–15
✓ JXST led
Model: JXST by 3 ✓ Model: Under 0.5 ✓
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
1H ATS — · #127
10
1H ATS — · #84
10
1H spread
NMSU -4
✓ MASS W ATS
1H total
23.5
▼ Under 20
Projected
12–15
 
Model: MASS by 0.5 ✓ Model: Over 3.5 ✗
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
Ohio
1H ATS — · #63
6
1H ATS — · #112
10
1H spread
SDSU -2
✓ SDSU W ATS
1H total
—
 
Projected
12–15
✓ SDSU led
Model: SDSU by 0.5 ✓
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
1H ATS — · #60
14
USC
1H ATS — · #23
21
1H spread
USC -18
✓ SJSU W ATS
1H total
33
▲ Over 35
Projected
13–14
✓ USC led
Model: SJSU by 16.5 ✓ Model: Under 5.5 ✗
1H finalConf · est. line
1H ATS — · #131
17
1H ATS — · #116
13
1H spread
LT -6
✓ FIU W ATS
1H total
—
 
Projected
13–15
✗ LT did not lead
Model: FIU by 4 ✓
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
1H ATS — · #123
14
1H ATS — · #111
21
1H spread
VAN -10
✓ HAW W ATS
1H total
28.5
▲ Over 35
Projected
12–16
✓ VAN led
Model: HAW by 6.5 ✓ Model: Under 0.5 ✗

Thursday, Aug 31

4
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
1H ATS — · #133
3
UCF
1H ATS — · #31
28
1H spread
UCF -20
✓ UCF W ATS
1H total
—
 
Projected
13–15
✓ UCF led
Model: KENT by 18.5 ✗
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
1H ATS — · #38
10
1H ATS — · #125
7
1H spread
NCSU -10
✓ CONN W ATS
1H total
—
 
Projected
13–15
✗ CONN did not lead
Model: CONN by 11.5 ✓
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
1H ATS — · #36
3
Utah
1H ATS — · #33
17
1H spread
UTAH -4.5
✓ UTAH W ATS
1H total
—
 
Projected
12–16
✓ UTAH led
Model: FLA by 1 ✗
1H finalConf · est. line
1H ATS — · #62
0
1H ATS — · #79
3
1H spread
MINN -4
✓ NEB W ATS
1H total
—
 
Projected
13–14
✓ MINN led
Model: NEB by 2.5 ✓

Friday, Sep 1

5
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
1H ATS — · #122
7
1H ATS — · #98
10
1H spread
MSU -9
✓ CMU W ATS
1H total
—
 
Projected
13–15
✓ MSU led
Model: CMU by 7.5 ✓
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
1H ATS — · #78
3
1H ATS — · #25
16
1H spread
MIA -10.5
✓ MIA W ATS
1H total
—
 
Projected
13–14
✓ MIA led
Model: M-OH by 9 ✗
1H finalNeutral · est. line
1H ATS — · #21
13
1H ATS — · #53
28
1H spread
LOU -5.5
✓ GT W ATS
1H total
—
 
Projected
14–14
 
Model: GT by 5.5 ✓
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
1H ATS —
10
1H ATS — · #24
17
1H spread
KU -19
✓ MOST W ATS
1H total
31.5
▼ Under 27
Projected
13–15
✓ KU led
Model: MOST by 17.5 ✓ Model: Under 3.5 ✓
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
1H ATS — · #106
21
1H ATS 1-0 · #123
10
1H spread
STAN -5.5
✓ STAN W ATS
1H total
30.5
▲ Over 31
Projected
12–14
✗ HAW did not lead
Model: HAW by 8 ✗ Model: Under 4 ✗

Saturday, Sep 2

33
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
1H ATS — · #110
0
1H ATS — · #3
23
1H spread
MICH -20
✓ MICH W ATS
1H total
27
▼ Under 23
Projected
13–14
✓ MICH led
Model: ECU by 18.5 ✗
1H finalNeutral · est. line
1H ATS — · #85
3
1H ATS — · #15
21
1H spread
TENN -16.5
✓ TENN W ATS
1H total
30.5
▼ Under 24
Projected
14–14
 
Model: UVA by 16.5 ✗ Model: Under 2.5 ✓
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
1H ATS — · #72
17
TCU
1H ATS — · #30
14
1H spread
TCU -12
✓ COLO W ATS
1H total
—
 
Projected
13–15
✗ TCU did not lead
Model: COLO by 10 ✓
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
1H ATS — · #107
0
1H ATS — · #9
45
1H spread
OU -19.5
✓ OU W ATS
1H total
—
 
Projected
13–15
✓ OU led
Model: ARST by 17.5 ✗
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
1H ATS — · #100
3
Iowa
1H ATS — · #54
17
1H spread
IOWA -14
Push
1H total
22.5
▼ Under 20
Projected
13–15
✓ IOWA led
Model: USU by 12 Model: Over 5 ✗
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
1H ATS — · #113
7
1H ATS — · #44
23
1H spread
UK -15
✓ UK W ATS
1H total
25.5
▲ Over 30
Projected
13–15
✓ UK led
Model: BALL by 13.5 ✗ Model: Over 2.5 ✓
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
1H ATS — · #80
14
1H ATS — · #32
24
1H spread
LIB -7
✓ LIB W ATS
1H total
—
 
Projected
13–15
✓ LIB led
Model: BGSU by 5.5 ✗
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
1H ATS — · #71
17
1H ATS — · #66
21
1H spread
PUR -3
✓ PUR W ATS
1H total
—
 
Projected
13–15
✓ PUR led
Model: FRES by 0.5 ✗
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
1H ATS 0-1 · #116
0
SMU
1H ATS — · #22
31
1H spread
SMU -10
✓ SMU W ATS
1H total
—
 
Projected
13–14
✓ SMU led
Model: LT by 8.5 ✗
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
1H ATS — · #94
7
1H ATS — · #75
0
1H spread
BC -4.5
✓ NIU W ATS
1H total
26
▼ Under 7
Projected
13–15
✗ BC did not lead
Model: NIU by 2.5 ✓ Model: Over 1.5 ✗
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
1H ATS — · #130
21
1H ATS — · #128
10
1H spread
TEM -6
✓ AKR W ATS
1H total
—
 
Projected
13–15
✗ TEM did not lead
Model: AKR by 4.5 ✓
1H finalConf · est. line
1H ATS — · #4
10
1H ATS — · #89
3
1H spread
OSU -16
✓ IU W ATS
1H total
31
▼ Under 13
Projected
13–15
✗ IU did not lead
Model: IU by 17.5 ✓ Model: Under 3 ✓
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
1H ATS — · #48
12
1H ATS — · #13
28
1H spread
WASH -9
✓ WASH W ATS
1H total
—
 
Projected
13–15
✓ WASH led
Model: BOIS by 7 ✗
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
Rice
1H ATS — · #90
3
1H ATS — · #8
16
1H spread
TEX -20.5
✓ RICE W ATS
1H total
30.5
▼ Under 19
Projected
13–15
✓ TEX led
Model: RICE by 19 ✓ Model: Under 3 ✓
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
1H ATS — · #119
10
1H ATS — · #42
14
1H spread
WIS -17
✓ BUFF W ATS
1H total
27.5
▼ Under 24
Projected
12–14
✓ WIS led
Model: BUFF by 15 ✓ Model: Under 1 ✓
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
1H ATS 1-0 · #127
7
1H ATS — · #40
31
1H spread
AUB -23
✓ AUB W ATS
1H total
28
▲ Over 38
Projected
13–15
✓ AUB led
Model: MASS by 21 ✗
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
1H ATS — · #95
17
1H ATS — · #83
17
1H spread
WKU -8
✓ USF W ATS
1H total
—
 
Projected
13–15
 
Model: USF by 6 ✓
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
1H ATS — · #57
33
1H ATS — · #103
21
1H spread
UNT -5.5
✓ CAL W ATS
1H total
—
 
Projected
13–15
✗ UNT did not lead
Model: CAL by 3 ✓
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
1H ATS — · #132
7
USC
1H ATS 0-1 · #23
35
1H spread
USC -22.5
✓ USC W ATS
1H total
—
 
Projected
13–15
✓ USC led
Model: NEV by 21 ✗
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
1H ATS — · #117
7
1H ATS — · #17
35
1H spread
TA&M -22
✓ TA&M W ATS
1H total
25
▲ Over 42
Projected
13–15
✓ TA&M led
Model: UNM by 20 ✗ Model: Over 2.5 ✓
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
Army
1H ATS — · #104
10
1H ATS — · #129
3
1H spread
ARMY -4
✓ ARMY W ATS
1H total
—
 
Projected
13–15
✗ ULM did not lead
Model: ULM by 6 ✗
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
1H ATS — · #46
17
1H ATS — · #109
3
1H spread
WSU -5.5
✓ WSU W ATS
1H total
28
▼ Under 20
Projected
12–15
✗ CSU did not lead
Model: CSU by 8 ✗ Model: Under 0.5 ✓
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
1H ATS — · #73
28
1H ATS — · #93
13
1H spread
BAY -15.5
✓ TXST W ATS
1H total
—
 
Projected
13–15
✗ BAY did not lead
Model: TXST by 14 ✓
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
UTSA
1H ATS — · #56
7
1H ATS — · #88
10
1H spread
UTSA -1.5
✓ HOU W ATS
1H total
31
▼ Under 17
Projected
13–15
✓ HOU led
Model: HOU by 3 ✓ Model: Under 3.5 ✓
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
1H ATS — · #99
0
1H ATS — · #7
28
1H spread
ALA -23
✓ ALA W ATS
1H total
—
 
Projected
13–15
✓ ALA led
Model: MTSU by 21.5 ✗
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
1H ATS — · #39
7
1H ATS — · #5
14
1H spread
PSU -12
✓ WVU W ATS
1H total
—
 
Projected
13–15
✓ PSU led
Model: WVU by 10.5 ✓
1H finalNeutral · est. line
1H ATS — · #34
17
1H ATS — · #47
14
1H spread
UNC -1.5
✓ UNC W ATS
1H total
33
▼ Under 31
Projected
14–14
 
Model: SC by 1.5 ✗ Model: Under 5 ✓
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
1H ATS — · #58
12
1H ATS — · #67
7
1H spread
ILL -6
✓ TOL W ATS
1H total
—
 
Projected
13–15
✗ ILL did not lead
Model: TOL by 4 ✓
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
1H ATS — · #49
10
1H ATS — · #55
24
1H spread
TULN -4
✓ TULN W ATS
1H total
—
 
Projected
13–14
✓ TULN led
Model: USA by 2.5 ✗
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
1H ATS — · #97
10
1H ATS — · #41
16
1H spread
VT -9.5
✓ ODU W ATS
1H total
25
▲ Over 26
Projected
13–15
✓ VT led
Model: ODU by 7.5 ✓ Model: Over 3 ✓
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
1H ATS — · #45
17
1H ATS — · #74
10
1H spread
TTU -8.5
✓ WYO W ATS
1H total
—
 
Projected
12–16
✗ WYO did not lead
Model: WYO by 11.5 ✓
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
1H ATS — · #114
0
BYU
1H ATS — · #86
7
1H spread
BYU -13.5
✓ SHSU W ATS
1H total
—
 
Projected
12–16
✓ BYU led
Model: SHSU by 10 ✓
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
1H ATS — · #70
6
UCLA
1H ATS — · #26
14
1H spread
UCLA -9.5
✓ CCU W ATS
1H total
—
 
Projected
13–15
✓ UCLA led
Model: CCU by 6.5 ✓

Sunday, Sep 3

3
1H finalConf · est. line
1H ATS — · #65
0
1H ATS — · #51
17
1H spread
RUTG -3
✓ RUTG W ATS
1H total
20.5
▼ Under 17
Projected
13–15
✓ RUTG led
Model: NU by 1 ✗ Model: Over 7 ✗
1H finalNon-conf · est. line
1H ATS — · #20
21
1H ATS 1-0 · #60
3
1H spread
ORST -9.5
✓ ORST W ATS
1H total
—
 
Projected
13–14
✗ SJSU did not lead
Model: SJSU by 11 ✗
1H finalNeutral · est. line
LSU
1H ATS — · #10
17
1H ATS — · #14
14
1H spread
LSU -1.5
✓ LSU W ATS
1H total
—
 
Projected
14–14
 
Model: FSU by 1.5 ✗

Monday, Sep 4

1
1H finalConf · est. line
1H ATS — · #19
7
Duke
1H ATS — · #37
6
1H spread
CLEM -7.5
✓ DUKE W ATS
1H total
—
 
Projected
13–15
✗ DUKE did not lead
Model: DUKE by 9 ✓
Loading…
StatusMatchup1H spreadMove1H totalModelTrendDetails
Loading…
1H ATS: the team's 1st-half margin plus its 1st-half line. Away team listed first. Spread edge = the model's 1st-half line minus the 1H spread (Total edge: the model's 1H total minus the 1H total), in points; a lean starts at 2 pts (3 on the total) and is context only. Projections use only games played before that week. Trends use each team's 1st halves earlier this season; dot = backtest status ( proven edge, above break-even but not proven, no edge). est. lines are estimated from the full-game line.
1H ATS leans (backtest)
1117-1157 (49.1%)
No edge 2016–26 · break-even 52.4%
1H O/U leans (backtest)
313-299 (51.1%)
No edge 3+ pt edges
Halftime leader picked
69.7%
7,953 games, walk-forward
This week
25-27 fav 1H ATS
O/U 7-14 · leans 9-3 ATS, 6-5 O/U

2023 team 1st-half records

Against the 1st-half line (real or estimated), halftime over/under and halftime leads
TeamGP1H ATSCover %1H O-ULed-trailed1H PF1H PA1H margin
Missouri State 1 1-0 100% 0-1 0-1 10.0 17.0 -7.0
Sacramento State 1 1-0 100% 0-1 1-0 17.0 14.0 +3.0
Kennesaw State 1 1-0 100% 1-0 1-0 21.0 7.0 +14.0
Missouri 13 10-3 76.9% 3-8-1 11-1-1 16.2 7.8 +8.4
West Virginia 13 10-3 76.9% 8-4 9-4 17.9 12.1 +5.8
Miami (OH) 14 9-3-2 75% 6-5-1 11-3 13.6 8.6 +4.9
Old Dominion 13 9-3 75% 6-5 6-5-2 11.3 12.6 -1.3
Northwestern 13 9-3-1 75% 4-9 6-4-3 10.4 9.6 +0.8
Liberty 14 10-4 71.4% 9-2-1 10-1-3 22.4 13.1 +9.3
Boise State 14 10-4 71.4% 6-5-1 10-3-1 18.6 13.0 +5.6
Miami 13 9-4 69.2% 7-4 8-3-2 15.4 9.2 +6.2
Georgia Tech 13 9-4 69.2% 5-6 5-7-1 15.8 13.0 +2.8
Bowling Green 13 9-4 69.2% 8-2-1 9-4 15.8 12.2 +3.7
Kansas State 13 9-4 69.2% 9-3 9-4 20.7 11.9 +8.8
Texas State 13 9-4 69.2% 7-5 9-3-1 22.2 15.5 +6.6
Western Michigan 12 8-4 66.7% 8-4 5-7 12.7 16.3 -3.7
UConn 12 8-4 66.7% 4-6 5-7 9.8 14.8 -5.1
East Carolina 12 8-4 66.7% 3-9 4-6-2 11.7 12.6 -0.9
Washington State 12 8-4 66.7% 6-5 7-4-1 20.5 12.7 +7.8
Oregon 14 9-5 64.3% 6-7-1 12-2 26.3 9.3 +17.0
UNLV 14 9-5 64.3% 8-6 8-6 17.6 14.9 +2.7
Akron 12 7-4-1 63.6% 3-6-1 4-6-2 8.8 11.9 -3.1
Army 12 7-4 63.6% 5-4 8-4 12.8 9.8 +3.1
Jacksonville State 13 8-5 61.5% 5-8 5-6-2 14.2 12.0 +2.2
San José State 13 8-5 61.5% 5-6 7-4-2 16.8 11.6 +5.2
Georgia State 13 8-5 61.5% 6-7 9-4 16.4 12.9 +3.5
NC State 13 8-5 61.5% 4-7 9-4 14.9 9.2 +5.7
Eastern Michigan 13 8-5 61.5% 7-5 5-6-2 11.4 13.7 -2.3
Kansas 13 8-5 61.5% 7-5 8-4-1 17.3 11.6 +5.7
Tennessee 13 8-5 61.5% 8-5 9-4 18.7 9.9 +8.8
Oklahoma 13 8-5 61.5% 6-5 10-1-2 24.8 12.9 +11.9
Rice 13 8-5 61.5% 6-6 7-6 16.2 13.4 +2.8
Auburn 13 8-5 61.5% 5-8 5-6-2 14.2 10.1 +4.2
South Florida 13 8-5 61.5% 7-5 5-6-2 17.8 16.8 +1.1
Georgia Southern 13 8-5 61.5% 6-6-1 7-5-1 17.0 14.5 +2.5
Texas A&M 13 8-5 61.5% 7-5 10-3 18.3 10.7 +7.6
Arizona 13 8-5 61.5% 3-9 7-5-1 16.1 10.8 +5.3
Michigan 15 9-6 60% 4-8-2 15-0 18.9 5.7 +13.3
Rutgers 13 7-5 58.3% 5-6 7-6 11.6 9.7 +1.9
UAB 12 7-5 58.3% 8-3-1 5-6-1 18.2 17.1 +1.1
Arizona State 12 7-5 58.3% 6-6 6-6 9.8 17.2 -7.4
Virginia 12 7-5 58.3% 6-6 3-7-2 10.3 14.8 -4.6
Indiana 12 7-5 58.3% 7-5 5-7 11.4 15.2 -3.8
Houston 12 7-5 58.3% 5-7 5-7 13.1 16.8 -3.8
Southern Miss 12 7-5 58.3% 7-4 4-7-1 11.6 16.9 -5.3
BYU 12 7-5 58.3% 9-2 6-5-1 14.1 15.9 -1.8
Sam Houston 12 7-5 58.3% 6-4 3-8-1 9.6 14.2 -4.6
Louisville 14 8-6 57.1% 4-8 8-5-1 15.8 9.6 +6.1
Tulane 14 8-6 57.1% 5-8 9-4-1 16.1 9.2 +6.9
New Mexico 12 6-5-1 54.5% 8-2-2 4-8 14.5 19.8 -5.3
SMU 14 7-6-1 53.8% 4-9 12-2 23.4 8.8 +14.6
Notre Dame 13 7-6 53.8% 4-7 10-2-1 17.5 6.7 +10.8
UCF 13 7-6 53.8% 4-7 6-4-3 17.6 11.5 +6.1
Ole Miss 13 7-6 53.8% 5-7 10-2-1 16.7 11.1 +5.6
Iowa State 13 7-6 53.8% 8-4 6-6-1 13.4 12.5 +0.8
Maryland 13 7-6 53.8% 9-3 6-4-3 16.6 11.8 +4.8
California 13 7-6 53.8% 7-4 7-6 16.9 18.6 -1.7
Louisiana 13 7-6 53.8% 5-8 6-4-3 15.8 12.0 +3.8
Coastal Carolina 13 7-6 53.8% 5-6-1 7-6 14.4 11.2 +3.2
Clemson 13 7-6 53.8% 6-5 10-2-1 15.8 8.3 +7.5
Washington 15 8-7 53.3% 7-7 10-3-2 22.9 13.5 +9.3
Texas 14 7-7 50% 6-7 12-1-1 19.3 8.9 +10.4
Toledo 14 7-7 50% 5-6-1 8-5-1 16.8 9.4 +7.4
James Madison 13 6-6-1 50% 5-8 11-2 16.4 8.1 +8.3
UTSA 13 6-6-1 50% 8-4 8-4-1 17.7 16.1 +1.6
Virginia Tech 13 6-6-1 50% 10-2 7-5-1 15.8 12.2 +3.6
Duke 13 6-6-1 50% 5-7 6-4-3 13.1 9.1 +4.0
San Diego State 12 6-6 50% 6-5 5-5-2 10.0 12.9 -2.9
Wake Forest 12 6-6 50% 5-6 2-8-2 9.1 15.2 -6.1
Florida 12 6-6 50% 5-5 6-5-1 15.0 13.5 +1.5
Tulsa 12 6-6 50% 7-4 4-7-1 13.6 19.7 -6.1
Michigan State 12 5-5-2 50% 5-5-1 4-7-1 7.4 15.2 -7.8
Stanford 12 6-6 50% 5-7 2-10 8.3 20.9 -12.7
Colorado 12 6-6 50% 6-5 4-8 12.6 17.8 -5.3
Pittsburgh 12 6-6 50% 5-6-1 3-7-2 10.5 12.8 -2.3
Middle Tennessee 12 6-6 50% 6-5 7-4-1 15.1 13.4 +1.7
New Mexico State 15 7-8 46.7% 5-8-1 7-4-4 14.5 11.5 +2.9
Utah 13 6-7 46.2% 7-5 7-5-1 12.1 10.8 +1.2
Arkansas State 13 6-7 46.2% 5-6 6-7 12.5 17.8 -5.4
Kentucky 13 6-7 46.2% 8-4 6-6-1 14.2 12.8 +1.5
Boston College 13 6-7 46.2% 6-6 5-8 10.7 16.2 -5.5
Air Force 13 6-7 46.2% 9-3-1 7-5-1 15.2 11.2 +4.1
Ohio State 13 6-7 46.2% 3-8-1 10-2-1 15.5 5.0 +10.5
Memphis 13 6-7 46.2% 9-3-1 7-4-2 20.6 13.6 +7.0
South Alabama 13 6-7 46.2% 5-6 7-5-1 16.9 11.0 +5.9
Wyoming 13 6-7 46.2% 5-5-1 7-6 15.0 10.8 +4.2
Texas Tech 13 6-7 46.2% 5-6 7-5-1 15.8 13.4 +2.4
Oregon State 13 6-7 46.2% 4-7 8-4-1 16.2 10.8 +5.4
LSU 13 6-7 46.2% 7-4 7-5-1 22.8 14.9 +7.9
Iowa 14 5-6-1 45.5% 3-7-1 9-4-1 7.6 6.1 +1.5
Utah State 13 5-6-2 45.5% 8-5 3-7-3 15.2 19.7 -4.5
Nebraska 12 5-6 45.5% 3-6 5-5-2 7.8 8.7 -0.9
Charlotte 12 5-6-1 45.5% 4-8 4-7-1 7.8 12.6 -4.8
Nevada 12 5-6-1 45.5% 4-7 3-8-1 8.8 15.5 -6.7
Colorado State 12 5-6-1 45.5% 6-6 5-5-2 12.5 12.7 -0.2
App State 14 6-8 42.9% 5-9 7-5-2 15.0 12.6 +2.4
Georgia 14 6-8 42.9% 8-5 10-2-2 21.8 9.0 +12.8
Troy 14 6-8 42.9% 3-10 9-5 13.4 9.0 +4.4
Alabama 14 6-8 42.9% 7-5 7-5-2 17.4 10.4 +7.0
UTEP 12 5-7 41.7% 5-7 2-7-3 10.6 14.8 -4.2
Florida International 12 5-7 41.7% 8-2 3-7-2 11.5 19.5 -8.0
Kent State 12 5-7 41.7% 4-6 3-9 8.5 16.8 -8.3
Central Michigan 12 5-7 41.7% 5-5 3-8-1 10.6 13.6 -3.0
Cincinnati 12 5-7 41.7% 7-5 3-9 13.1 14.1 -1.0
Florida Atlantic 12 5-7 41.7% 6-5 5-7 12.1 15.1 -3.0
Ohio 13 5-8 38.5% 2-9 7-5-1 11.5 5.7 +5.8
USC 13 5-8 38.5% 8-3 6-6-1 22.4 16.8 +5.5
Hawai'i 13 5-8 38.5% 7-6 3-9-1 9.4 18.8 -9.4
Northern Illinois 13 5-8 38.5% 3-9 4-7-2 10.3 10.6 -0.3
Western Kentucky 13 5-8 38.5% 6-5 7-5-1 17.9 14.5 +3.5
Penn State 13 5-8 38.5% 4-7-1 9-3-1 15.8 7.8 +8.0
Ball State 12 4-7-1 36.4% 4-6-1 3-7-2 7.7 14.1 -6.4
Purdue 12 4-7-1 36.4% 3-7 3-8-1 9.8 16.1 -6.3
North Texas 12 4-7-1 36.4% 8-2 4-7-1 16.8 21.1 -4.3
Minnesota 13 4-8-1 33.3% 6-5 5-7-1 11.1 13.1 -2.0
Louisiana Tech 12 4-8 33.3% 4-5 3-8-1 11.7 20.4 -8.8
Arkansas 12 4-8 33.3% 6-5 5-6-1 13.3 14.9 -1.7
Buffalo 12 4-8 33.3% 5-6 4-8 9.1 14.4 -5.3
Mississippi State 12 4-8 33.3% 6-6 5-7 10.3 15.7 -5.3
UL Monroe 12 4-8 33.3% 4-6 1-10-1 9.1 18.5 -9.4
South Carolina 12 4-8 33.3% 6-6 6-6 13.9 14.8 -0.9
Fresno State 13 4-9 30.8% 4-7 7-5-1 15.1 12.2 +2.9
Wisconsin 13 4-9 30.8% 6-6 4-7-2 10.2 12.2 -1.9
Syracuse 13 4-9 30.8% 6-5-1 4-9 11.5 15.4 -3.8
North Carolina 13 4-9 30.8% 7-5 8-4-1 17.7 14.2 +3.5
UCLA 13 4-9 30.8% 4-7 6-7 13.0 10.2 +2.8
Navy 12 3-7-1 30% 3-6 4-6-2 7.7 13.9 -6.3
Oklahoma State 14 4-10 28.6% 7-6 5-9 13.4 17.1 -3.8
Florida State 14 4-10 28.6% 7-5 8-5-1 15.9 12.2 +3.7
Marshall 13 3-8-2 27.3% 7-5 3-9-1 12.0 16.3 -4.3
Massachusetts 12 3-9 25% 5-6 3-8-1 9.1 20.9 -11.8
Temple 12 3-9 25% 4-6 3-9 10.8 18.3 -7.5
Baylor 12 3-9 25% 5-5 3-9 9.8 18.8 -8.9
Illinois 12 3-9 25% 8-2 3-8-1 12.8 16.2 -3.4
TCU 12 2-9-1 18.2% 4-6 6-6 14.8 16.7 -1.9
Vanderbilt 12 1-11 8.3% 6-5 2-10 9.3 19.5 -10.2
Delaware 1 0-1 0% 1-0 0-1 7.0 35.0 -28.0

How it works

Halftime scores come from ESPN quarter scores (Q1 + Q2) for every game since 2015.

1st-half lines. ESPN publishes no college 1st-half lines. Real ones come from The Odds API’s US books (DraftKings first) for games kicking off within about five days (the biggest matchups first, a capped number a day), pulled once, so a line shows the time it was fetched; every other game, and every past college game, is estimated from the full-game closing line (spread × 0.59, total × 0.52, rounded to the half point: the share of the margin and points college teams score before halftime). A real line shows its book; an estimated one is marked “est.”

Projection. The full-game model's margin and total, scaled the same way. The blend was chosen by the lowest walk-forward error.

Spread edge and Total edge. The model’s 1st-half line (total) minus the market’s, in points. A lean starts when the projection beats the 1H line by 2–6 pts (ATS) or 3+ pts (O/U). Shown for context: neither has a proven edge.

Picks and prices. For a game with a posted 1st-half line, tap Pick on its tile to save a 1H spread or total pick (graded on the halftime score; they show in My picks). The game card’s Market tab lists every book’s 1st-half price.

NCAAF first-half betting FAQ

First-half lines, 1H ATS and halftime totals explained

What is a first-half spread in the NCAAF?

A first-half (1H) spread is a point spread graded on the score at halftime only. A team covers the 1st-half spread when its 1st-half margin plus its 1st-half line is positive; the 2nd half and overtime don't count.

How are NCAAF first-half lines set here?

ESPN publishes no college 1st-half lines. Real ones come from The Odds API’s US books (DraftKings first) for games kicking off within about five days (the biggest matchups first, a capped number a day), pulled once, so a line shows the time it was fetched; every other game, and every past college game, is estimated from the full-game closing line (spread × 0.59, total × 0.52, rounded to the half point: the share of the margin and points college teams score before halftime).

How is the 1st-half projection made?

The full-game power-rating model's margin and total are scaled to the first half. Every past week is predicted only from games played before it.

Do the 1st-half leans beat the market?

Not so far. Over 2016–26, 1st-half ATS leans went 1117-1157 (49.1%) and over/under leans 313-299 (51.1%), below or near the 52.4% needed to break even at -110 odds, so they are shown as context only.

How often does the model pick the team leading at halftime?

69.7% of 7,953 NCAAF games in the 2016–26 walk-forward backtest.