NCAAF 1st half2023 Bowls & playoff: 42 of 42 games final. Favorites went 17-24 against the first-half spread, and halftime totals went 22 over, 19 under.How 1st-half lines work ⓘ
FinalCurrentUpcomingFull-game view of Bowls & playoff ›
Sort by
⌨ Shortcuts

Group the list

Sort by
No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.

Jump to

Saturday, Dec 16

6
1H finalMyrtle Beach Bowl · est. line
1H ATS 8-4 · #92
0
Ohio
1H ATS 4-8 · #63
20
1H spread
GASO -1
✓ OHIO W ATS
1H total
25
▼ Under 20
Projected
13–15
✓ OHIO led
Model: OHIO by 3.5 ✓ Model: Over 3 ✗
1H finalR+L Carriers New Orleans Bowl · est. line
1H ATS 8-4 · #69
14
1H ATS 6-6 · #87
14
1H spread
JXST -2
✓ UL W ATS
1H total
30.5
▼ Under 28
Projected
15–14
 
Model: Under 1.5 ✓
1H finalAvocados From Mexico Cure Bowl · est. line
1H ATS 8-3-2 · #78
3
1H ATS 6-7 · #61
6
1H spread
APP -4
✓ M-OH W ATS
1H total
21.5
▼ Under 9
Projected
11–13
✓ APP led
Trend: Hot 1st-half cover team: M-OH ✓ Trend: Fast starter edge: M-OH ✓ Model: M-OH by 2 ✓ Model: Over 3 ✗
1H finalIsleta New Mexico Bowl · est. line
1H ATS 7-7 · #84
3
1H ATS 3-9 · #71
17
1H spread
NMSU -2
✓ FRES W ATS
1H total
27
▼ Under 20
Projected
14–13
✗ NMSU did not lead
Trend: Fade a cold 1st-half team: NMSU ✗ Model: FRES by 1.5 ✓
1H finalStarco Brands LA Bowl · est. line
UCLA
1H ATS 4-8 · #26
7
1H ATS 9-4 · #48
16
1H spread
UCLA -4
✓ BOIS W ATS
1H total
24
▼ Under 23
Projected
14–12
✗ UCLA did not lead
Trend: Fast starter edge: BOIS ✓ Model: BOIS by 2.5 ✓ Model: Over 1.5 ✗
1H finalRadiance Technologies Independence Bowl · est. line
1H ATS 7-5 · #57
14
1H ATS 5-7 · #45
24
1H spread
TTU -2
✓ TTU W ATS
1H total
28.5
▲ Over 38
Projected
14–15
✓ TTU led
Model: CAL by 1.5 ✗ Model: Over 1 ✓

Monday, Dec 18

1
1H finalFamous Toastery Bowl · est. line
1H ATS 5-7 · #83
7
1H ATS 8-3 · #97
28
1H spread
ODU -2.5
✓ ODU W ATS
1H total
25.5
▲ Over 35
Projected
15–13
✗ WKU did not lead
Trend: Hot 1st-half cover team: ODU ✓ Trend: Fast starter edge: WKU ✗ Model: WKU by 4 ✗ Model: Over 2.5 ✓

Tuesday, Dec 19

1
1H finalScooter's Coffee Frisco Bowl · est. line
UTSA
1H ATS 6-6 · #56
21
1H ATS 3-8-1 · #96
17
1H spread
UTSA -4
Push
1H total
24.5
▲ Over 38
Projected
15–11
✓ UTSA led
Trend: Fade a cold 1st-half team: UTSA Model: UTSA by 0.5 Model: Over 1 ✓

Thursday, Dec 21

1
1H finalRoofClaim.com Boca Raton Bowl · est. line
1H ATS 7-5 · #95
31
1H ATS 4-8 · #82
0
1H spread
SYR -2
✓ USF W ATS
1H total
29
▲ Over 31
Projected
13–18
✗ SYR did not lead
Model: SYR by 3 ✗ Model: Over 1 ✓

Friday, Dec 22

1
1H finalUnion Home Mortgage Gasparilla Bowl · est. line
1H ATS 8-4 · #53
17
UCF
1H ATS 7-5 · #31
17
1H spread
UCF -3.5
✓ GT W ATS
1H total
34.5
▼ Under 34
Projected
15–18
 
Model: GT by 0.5 ✓ Model: Under 2 ✓

Saturday, Dec 23

7
1H final76 Birmingham Bowl · est. line
Troy
1H ATS 6-7 · #29
0
Duke
1H ATS 5-6-1 · #37
14
1H spread
TROY -4
✓ DUKE W ATS
1H total
23
▼ Under 14
Projected
12–11
✗ TROY did not lead
Model: DUKE by 3 ✓
1H finalCamellia Bowl · est. line
1H ATS 6-6 · #107
13
1H ATS 4-8 · #94
21
1H spread
ARST -1.5
✓ NIU W ATS
1H total
28
▲ Over 34
Projected
13–15
✓ NIU led
Model: NIU by 3.5 ✓
1H finalLockheed Martin Armed Forces Bowl · est. line
1H ATS 6-5-1 · #28
7
1H ATS 5-7 · #52
21
1H spread
AFA -1.5
✓ AFA W ATS
1H total
23
▲ Over 28
Projected
13–9
✗ JMU did not lead
Trend: Fast starter edge: JMU ✗ Model: JMU by 6 ✗ Model: Under 1.5 ✗
1H finalFamous Idaho Potato Bowl · est. line
1H ATS 7-5 · #91
31
1H ATS 5-5-2 · #100
14
1H spread
USU -1.5
✓ GAST W ATS
1H total
30.5
▲ Over 45
Projected
15–16
✗ USU did not lead
Trend: Fast starter edge: GAST ✓ Model: GAST by 1 ✓ Model: Over 1 ✓
1H final68 Ventures Bowl · est. line
1H ATS 8-4 · #126
3
1H ATS 5-7 · #49
38
1H spread
EMU -10.5
✓ USA W ATS
1H total
22
▲ Over 41
Projected
5–18
✓ USA led
Trend: Fast starter edge: USA ✓ Model: USA by 24 ✓ Model: Over 1.5 ✓
1H finalSRS Distribution Las Vegas Bowl · est. line
Utah
1H ATS 6-6 · #33
0
1H ATS 8-3-1 · #65
7
1H spread
UTAH -4
✓ NU W ATS
1H total
23
▼ Under 7
Projected
13–8
✗ UTAH did not lead
Trend: Hot 1st-half cover team: NU ✓ Model: UTAH by 2 ✗ Model: Under 2 ✓
1H finalEasyPost Hawaiʻi Bowl · est. line
1H ATS 6-6 · #70
7
1H ATS 8-4 · #60
0
1H spread
SJSU -4.5
✓ CCU W ATS
1H total
25
▼ Under 7
Projected
13–15
✗ SJSU did not lead
Model: CCU by 2.5 ✓ Model: Over 2.5 ✗

Tuesday, Dec 26

3
1H finalQuick Lane Bowl · est. line
1H ATS 8-4 · #80
10
1H ATS 4-7-1 · #79
9
1H spread
MINN -1.5
✓ BGSU W ATS
1H total
23
▼ Under 19
Projected
12–12
✗ MINN did not lead
Trend: Fast starter edge: BGSU ✓ Model: BGSU by 1 ✓ Model: Over 0.5 ✗
1H finalSERVPRO First Responder Bowl · est. line
1H ATS 8-4 · #73
24
Rice
1H ATS 8-4 · #90
21
1H spread
TXST -2
✓ TXST W ATS
1H total
31
▲ Over 45
Projected
16–16
✓ TXST led
Model: RICE by 1.5 ✗ Model: Over 1 ✓
1H finalGuaranteed Rate Bowl · est. line
1H ATS 7-5 · #24
28
UNLV
1H ATS 9-4 · #68
10
1H spread
KU -4.5
✓ KU W ATS
1H total
34
▲ Over 38
Projected
20–14
✓ KU led
Trend: Fast starter edge: UNLV ✗ Model: KU by 1.5 ✓ Model: Under 0.5 ✗

Wednesday, Dec 27

4
1H finalMilitary Bowl · est. line
1H ATS 6-5-1 · #41
17
1H ATS 7-6 · #55
10
1H spread
VT -7.5
✓ TULN W ATS
1H total
22.5
▲ Over 27
Projected
12–12
✓ VT led
Trend: Fast starter edge: TULN ✓ Model: TULN by 7 ✓ Model: Over 1.5 ✓
1H finalDuke's Mayo Bowl · est. line
1H ATS 4-8 · #34
10
1H ATS 9-3 · #39
17
1H spread
WVU -2.5
✓ WVU W ATS
1H total
32
▼ Under 27
Projected
17–15
✗ UNC did not lead
Trend: Hot 1st-half cover team: WVU ✓ Model: UNC by 5 ✗ Model: Over 0.5 ✗
1H finalDirecTV Holiday Bowl · est. line
1H ATS 8-5 · #21
14
USC
1H ATS 4-8 · #23
28
1H spread
LOU -3
✓ USC W ATS
1H total
30
▲ Over 42
Projected
18–16
✗ LOU did not lead
Model: USC by 1.5 ✓ Model: Over 4 ✓
1H finalTaxAct Texas Bowl · est. line
1H ATS 8-4 · #17
6
1H ATS 3-10 · #43
24
1H spread
OKST -2.5
✓ OKST W ATS
1H total
29
▲ Over 30
Projected
17–11
✗ TA&M did not lead
Trend: Fade a cold 1st-half team: TA&M ✗ Trend: Fast starter edge: TA&M ✗ Model: TA&M by 9 ✗ Model: Under 1 ✗

Thursday, Dec 28

4
1H finalWasabi Fenway Bowl · est. line
SMU
1H ATS 7-5-1 · #22
14
1H ATS 5-7 · #75
10
1H spread
SMU -8
✓ BC W ATS
1H total
25.5
▼ Under 24
Projected
18–9
✓ SMU led
Model: SMU by 2 ✗ Model: Over 1.5 ✗
1H finalBad Boy Mowers Pinstripe Bowl · est. line
1H ATS 6-5 · #51
14
1H ATS 9-3 · #25
10
1H spread
RUTG -1.5
✓ RUTG W ATS
1H total
21.5
▲ Over 24
Projected
9–14
✗ MIA did not lead
Trend: Hot 1st-half cover team: MIA ✗ Trend: Fast starter edge: MIA ✗ Model: MIA by 6.5 ✗ Model: Over 2 ✓
1H finalPop-Tarts Bowl · est. line
1H ATS 8-4 · #38
10
1H ATS 8-4 · #11
21
1H spread
KSU -2
✓ KSU W ATS
1H total
25.5
▲ Over 31
Projected
10–16
✓ KSU led
Model: KSU by 4 ✓ Model: Over 1 ✓
1H finalValero Alamo Bowl · est. line
1H ATS 8-4 · #18
13
1H ATS 7-5 · #9
14
1H spread
ARIZ -1.5
✓ OU W ATS
1H total
31
▼ Under 27
Projected
14–19
✓ OU led
Trend: Fast starter edge: OU ✓ Model: OU by 7 ✓ Model: Over 2.5 ✗

Friday, Dec 29

4
1H finalTaxSlayer Gator Bowl · est. line
1H ATS 7-5 · #19
10
1H ATS 5-7 · #44
14
1H spread
CLEM -2
✓ UK W ATS
1H total
23
▲ Over 24
Projected
14–9
✗ CLEM did not lead
Model: CLEM by 3.5 ✗
1H finalTony the Tiger Sun Bowl · est. line
1H ATS 6-6 · #20
0
1H ATS 6-6 · #6
14
1H spread
ND -3
✓ ND W ATS
1H total
21
▼ Under 14
Projected
12–16
✓ ND led
Model: ND by 1 ✓ Model: Over 7.5 ✗
1H finalAutoZone Liberty Bowl · est. line
1H ATS 7-5 · #35
13
1H ATS 5-7 · #50
22
1H spread
MEM -6
✓ MEM W ATS
1H total
30
▲ Over 35
Projected
15–12
✗ ISU did not lead
Model: ISU by 8.5 ✗ Model: Under 3.5 ✗
1H finalGoodyear Cotton Bowl Classic · est. line
1H ATS 10-2 · #12
0
1H ATS 5-7 · #4
3
1H spread
OSU -2.5
✓ OSU W ATS
1H total
26.5
▼ Under 3
Projected
11–16
✓ OSU led
Trend: 1st-half under teams: Under ✓ Trend: Hot 1st-half cover team: MIZ ✗ Model: OSU by 2.5 ✓ Model: Over 0.5 ✗

Saturday, Dec 30

4
1H finalChick-fil-A Peach Bowl · est. line
1H ATS 6-6 · #16
20
1H ATS 5-7 · #5
17
1H spread
PSU -3
✓ MISS W ATS
1H total
27.5
▲ Over 37
Projected
12–16
✗ PSU did not lead
Model: PSU by 2 ✗ Model: Over 0.5 ✓
1H finalTransPerfect Music City Bowl · est. line
1H ATS 8-4 · #40
7
1H ATS 6-6 · #27
24
1H spread
AUB -2.5
✓ MD W ATS
1H total
25
▲ Over 31
Projected
12–13
✓ MD led
Model: MD by 3 ✓ Model: Over 0.5 ✓
1H finalCapital One Orange Bowl · est. line
1H ATS 5-8 · #1
42
1H ATS 4-9 · #14
3
1H spread
UGA -14
✓ UGA W ATS
1H total
24.5
▲ Over 45
Projected
15–13
✓ UGA led
Trend: Fast starter edge: FSU ✗ Model: FSU by 11.5 ✗ Model: Over 3.5 ✓
1H finalBarstool Sports Arizona Bowl · est. line
1H ATS 6-7 · #58
10
1H ATS 6-6 · #74
6
1H spread
WYO -3
✓ TOL W ATS
1H total
23
▼ Under 16
Projected
14–11
✓ TOL led
Trend: Fast starter edge: TOL ✓ Model: TOL by 6.5 ✓ Model: Over 1.5 ✗

Monday, Jan 1

5
1H finalReliaQuest Bowl · est. line
1H ATS 3-9 · #42
21
LSU
1H ATS 6-6 · #10
14
1H spread
LSU -5.5
✓ WIS W ATS
1H total
31
▲ Over 35
Projected
12–22
✗ LSU did not lead
Trend: Fade a cold 1st-half team: LSU ✗ Model: LSU by 4 ✗ Model: Over 3 ✓
1H finalVrbo Fiesta Bowl · est. line
1H ATS 10-3 · #32
6
1H ATS 8-5 · #2
31
1H spread
ORE -11
✓ ORE W ATS
1H total
37
Push 37
Projected
13–22
✓ ORE led
Trend: Hot 1st-half cover team: LIB ✗ Trend: Fast starter edge: LIB ✗ Model: LIB by 1 ✗ Model: Under 2
1H finalCheez-It Citrus Bowl · est. line
Iowa
1H ATS 5-5-1 · #54
0
1H ATS 7-5 · #15
14
1H spread
TENN -3
✓ TENN W ATS
1H total
19
▼ Under 14
Projected
7–13
✓ TENN led
Model: TENN by 3 ✓ Model: Over 1.5 ✗
1H finalCFP Semifinal at the Rose Bowl Game Pres. by Prudential · est. line
1H ATS 6-7 · #7
10
1H ATS 7-6 · #3
13
1H spread
MICH -1
✓ MICH W ATS
1H total
24
▼ Under 23
Projected
11–14
✓ MICH led
Model: MICH by 1.5 ✓ Model: Over 1.5 ✗
1H finalCFP Semifinal at the Allstate Sugar Bowl · est. line
1H ATS 7-6 · #8
21
1H ATS 7-6 · #13
21
1H spread
TEX -2
✓ WASH W ATS
1H total
32
▲ Over 42
Projected
17–14
 
Model: TEX by 0.5 ✗ Model: Under 0.5 ✗

Monday, Jan 8

1
1H finalCFP National Championship Pres. by AT&T · est. line
1H ATS 8-6 · #13
10
1H ATS 8-6 · #3
17
1H spread
MICH -3
✓ MICH W ATS
1H total
29
▼ Under 27
Projected
13–18
✓ MICH led
Model: MICH by 2 ✓ Model: Over 1 ✗
Loading…
StatusMatchup1H spreadMove1H totalModelTrendDetails
Loading…
1H ATS: the team's 1st-half margin plus its 1st-half line. Away team listed first. Spread edge = the model's 1st-half line minus the 1H spread (Total edge: the model's 1H total minus the 1H total), in points; a lean starts at 2 pts (3 on the total) and is context only. Projections use only games played before that week. Trends use each team's 1st halves earlier this season; dot = backtest status ( proven edge, above break-even but not proven, no edge). est. lines are estimated from the full-game line.
1H ATS leans (backtest)
1117-1157 (49.1%)
No edge 2016–26 · break-even 52.4%
1H O/U leans (backtest)
313-299 (51.1%)
No edge 3+ pt edges
Halftime leader picked
69.7%
7,953 games, walk-forward
This week
17-24 fav 1H ATS
O/U 22-19 · leans 9-6 ATS, 2-3 O/U

2023 team 1st-half records

Against the 1st-half line (real or estimated), halftime over/under and halftime leads
TeamGP1H ATSCover %1H O-ULed-trailed1H PF1H PA1H margin
Missouri State 1 1-0 100% 0-1 0-1 10.0 17.0 -7.0
Sacramento State 1 1-0 100% 0-1 1-0 17.0 14.0 +3.0
Kennesaw State 1 1-0 100% 1-0 1-0 21.0 7.0 +14.0
Missouri 13 10-3 76.9% 3-8-1 11-1-1 16.2 7.8 +8.4
West Virginia 13 10-3 76.9% 8-4 9-4 17.9 12.1 +5.8
Miami (OH) 14 9-3-2 75% 6-5-1 11-3 13.6 8.6 +4.9
Old Dominion 13 9-3 75% 6-5 6-5-2 11.3 12.6 -1.3
Northwestern 13 9-3-1 75% 4-9 6-4-3 10.4 9.6 +0.8
Liberty 14 10-4 71.4% 9-2-1 10-1-3 22.4 13.1 +9.3
Boise State 14 10-4 71.4% 6-5-1 10-3-1 18.6 13.0 +5.6
Miami 13 9-4 69.2% 7-4 8-3-2 15.4 9.2 +6.2
Georgia Tech 13 9-4 69.2% 5-6 5-7-1 15.8 13.0 +2.8
Bowling Green 13 9-4 69.2% 8-2-1 9-4 15.8 12.2 +3.7
Kansas State 13 9-4 69.2% 9-3 9-4 20.7 11.9 +8.8
Texas State 13 9-4 69.2% 7-5 9-3-1 22.2 15.5 +6.6
Western Michigan 12 8-4 66.7% 8-4 5-7 12.7 16.3 -3.7
UConn 12 8-4 66.7% 4-6 5-7 9.8 14.8 -5.1
East Carolina 12 8-4 66.7% 3-9 4-6-2 11.7 12.6 -0.9
Washington State 12 8-4 66.7% 6-5 7-4-1 20.5 12.7 +7.8
Oregon 14 9-5 64.3% 6-7-1 12-2 26.3 9.3 +17.0
UNLV 14 9-5 64.3% 8-6 8-6 17.6 14.9 +2.7
Akron 12 7-4-1 63.6% 3-6-1 4-6-2 8.8 11.9 -3.1
Army 12 7-4 63.6% 5-4 8-4 12.8 9.8 +3.1
Jacksonville State 13 8-5 61.5% 5-8 5-6-2 14.2 12.0 +2.2
San José State 13 8-5 61.5% 5-6 7-4-2 16.8 11.6 +5.2
Georgia State 13 8-5 61.5% 6-7 9-4 16.4 12.9 +3.5
NC State 13 8-5 61.5% 4-7 9-4 14.9 9.2 +5.7
Eastern Michigan 13 8-5 61.5% 7-5 5-6-2 11.4 13.7 -2.3
Kansas 13 8-5 61.5% 7-5 8-4-1 17.3 11.6 +5.7
Tennessee 13 8-5 61.5% 8-5 9-4 18.7 9.9 +8.8
Oklahoma 13 8-5 61.5% 6-5 10-1-2 24.8 12.9 +11.9
Rice 13 8-5 61.5% 6-6 7-6 16.2 13.4 +2.8
Auburn 13 8-5 61.5% 5-8 5-6-2 14.2 10.1 +4.2
South Florida 13 8-5 61.5% 7-5 5-6-2 17.8 16.8 +1.1
Georgia Southern 13 8-5 61.5% 6-6-1 7-5-1 17.0 14.5 +2.5
Texas A&M 13 8-5 61.5% 7-5 10-3 18.3 10.7 +7.6
Arizona 13 8-5 61.5% 3-9 7-5-1 16.1 10.8 +5.3
Michigan 15 9-6 60% 4-8-2 15-0 18.9 5.7 +13.3
Rutgers 13 7-5 58.3% 5-6 7-6 11.6 9.7 +1.9
UAB 12 7-5 58.3% 8-3-1 5-6-1 18.2 17.1 +1.1
Arizona State 12 7-5 58.3% 6-6 6-6 9.8 17.2 -7.4
Virginia 12 7-5 58.3% 6-6 3-7-2 10.3 14.8 -4.6
Indiana 12 7-5 58.3% 7-5 5-7 11.4 15.2 -3.8
Houston 12 7-5 58.3% 5-7 5-7 13.1 16.8 -3.8
Southern Miss 12 7-5 58.3% 7-4 4-7-1 11.6 16.9 -5.3
BYU 12 7-5 58.3% 9-2 6-5-1 14.1 15.9 -1.8
Sam Houston 12 7-5 58.3% 6-4 3-8-1 9.6 14.2 -4.6
Louisville 14 8-6 57.1% 4-8 8-5-1 15.8 9.6 +6.1
Tulane 14 8-6 57.1% 5-8 9-4-1 16.1 9.2 +6.9
New Mexico 12 6-5-1 54.5% 8-2-2 4-8 14.5 19.8 -5.3
SMU 14 7-6-1 53.8% 4-9 12-2 23.4 8.8 +14.6
Notre Dame 13 7-6 53.8% 4-7 10-2-1 17.5 6.7 +10.8
UCF 13 7-6 53.8% 4-7 6-4-3 17.6 11.5 +6.1
Ole Miss 13 7-6 53.8% 5-7 10-2-1 16.7 11.1 +5.6
Iowa State 13 7-6 53.8% 8-4 6-6-1 13.4 12.5 +0.8
Maryland 13 7-6 53.8% 9-3 6-4-3 16.6 11.8 +4.8
California 13 7-6 53.8% 7-4 7-6 16.9 18.6 -1.7
Louisiana 13 7-6 53.8% 5-8 6-4-3 15.8 12.0 +3.8
Coastal Carolina 13 7-6 53.8% 5-6-1 7-6 14.4 11.2 +3.2
Clemson 13 7-6 53.8% 6-5 10-2-1 15.8 8.3 +7.5
Washington 15 8-7 53.3% 7-7 10-3-2 22.9 13.5 +9.3
Texas 14 7-7 50% 6-7 12-1-1 19.3 8.9 +10.4
Toledo 14 7-7 50% 5-6-1 8-5-1 16.8 9.4 +7.4
James Madison 13 6-6-1 50% 5-8 11-2 16.4 8.1 +8.3
UTSA 13 6-6-1 50% 8-4 8-4-1 17.7 16.1 +1.6
Virginia Tech 13 6-6-1 50% 10-2 7-5-1 15.8 12.2 +3.6
Duke 13 6-6-1 50% 5-7 6-4-3 13.1 9.1 +4.0
San Diego State 12 6-6 50% 6-5 5-5-2 10.0 12.9 -2.9
Wake Forest 12 6-6 50% 5-6 2-8-2 9.1 15.2 -6.1
Florida 12 6-6 50% 5-5 6-5-1 15.0 13.5 +1.5
Tulsa 12 6-6 50% 7-4 4-7-1 13.6 19.7 -6.1
Michigan State 12 5-5-2 50% 5-5-1 4-7-1 7.4 15.2 -7.8
Stanford 12 6-6 50% 5-7 2-10 8.3 20.9 -12.7
Colorado 12 6-6 50% 6-5 4-8 12.6 17.8 -5.3
Pittsburgh 12 6-6 50% 5-6-1 3-7-2 10.5 12.8 -2.3
Middle Tennessee 12 6-6 50% 6-5 7-4-1 15.1 13.4 +1.7
New Mexico State 15 7-8 46.7% 5-8-1 7-4-4 14.5 11.5 +2.9
Utah 13 6-7 46.2% 7-5 7-5-1 12.1 10.8 +1.2
Arkansas State 13 6-7 46.2% 5-6 6-7 12.5 17.8 -5.4
Kentucky 13 6-7 46.2% 8-4 6-6-1 14.2 12.8 +1.5
Boston College 13 6-7 46.2% 6-6 5-8 10.7 16.2 -5.5
Air Force 13 6-7 46.2% 9-3-1 7-5-1 15.2 11.2 +4.1
Ohio State 13 6-7 46.2% 3-8-1 10-2-1 15.5 5.0 +10.5
Memphis 13 6-7 46.2% 9-3-1 7-4-2 20.6 13.6 +7.0
South Alabama 13 6-7 46.2% 5-6 7-5-1 16.9 11.0 +5.9
Wyoming 13 6-7 46.2% 5-5-1 7-6 15.0 10.8 +4.2
Texas Tech 13 6-7 46.2% 5-6 7-5-1 15.8 13.4 +2.4
Oregon State 13 6-7 46.2% 4-7 8-4-1 16.2 10.8 +5.4
LSU 13 6-7 46.2% 7-4 7-5-1 22.8 14.9 +7.9
Iowa 14 5-6-1 45.5% 3-7-1 9-4-1 7.6 6.1 +1.5
Utah State 13 5-6-2 45.5% 8-5 3-7-3 15.2 19.7 -4.5
Nebraska 12 5-6 45.5% 3-6 5-5-2 7.8 8.7 -0.9
Charlotte 12 5-6-1 45.5% 4-8 4-7-1 7.8 12.6 -4.8
Nevada 12 5-6-1 45.5% 4-7 3-8-1 8.8 15.5 -6.7
Colorado State 12 5-6-1 45.5% 6-6 5-5-2 12.5 12.7 -0.2
App State 14 6-8 42.9% 5-9 7-5-2 15.0 12.6 +2.4
Georgia 14 6-8 42.9% 8-5 10-2-2 21.8 9.0 +12.8
Troy 14 6-8 42.9% 3-10 9-5 13.4 9.0 +4.4
Alabama 14 6-8 42.9% 7-5 7-5-2 17.4 10.4 +7.0
UTEP 12 5-7 41.7% 5-7 2-7-3 10.6 14.8 -4.2
Florida International 12 5-7 41.7% 8-2 3-7-2 11.5 19.5 -8.0
Kent State 12 5-7 41.7% 4-6 3-9 8.5 16.8 -8.3
Central Michigan 12 5-7 41.7% 5-5 3-8-1 10.6 13.6 -3.0
Cincinnati 12 5-7 41.7% 7-5 3-9 13.1 14.1 -1.0
Florida Atlantic 12 5-7 41.7% 6-5 5-7 12.1 15.1 -3.0
Ohio 13 5-8 38.5% 2-9 7-5-1 11.5 5.7 +5.8
USC 13 5-8 38.5% 8-3 6-6-1 22.4 16.8 +5.5
Hawai'i 13 5-8 38.5% 7-6 3-9-1 9.4 18.8 -9.4
Northern Illinois 13 5-8 38.5% 3-9 4-7-2 10.3 10.6 -0.3
Western Kentucky 13 5-8 38.5% 6-5 7-5-1 17.9 14.5 +3.5
Penn State 13 5-8 38.5% 4-7-1 9-3-1 15.8 7.8 +8.0
Ball State 12 4-7-1 36.4% 4-6-1 3-7-2 7.7 14.1 -6.4
Purdue 12 4-7-1 36.4% 3-7 3-8-1 9.8 16.1 -6.3
North Texas 12 4-7-1 36.4% 8-2 4-7-1 16.8 21.1 -4.3
Minnesota 13 4-8-1 33.3% 6-5 5-7-1 11.1 13.1 -2.0
Louisiana Tech 12 4-8 33.3% 4-5 3-8-1 11.7 20.4 -8.8
Arkansas 12 4-8 33.3% 6-5 5-6-1 13.3 14.9 -1.7
Buffalo 12 4-8 33.3% 5-6 4-8 9.1 14.4 -5.3
Mississippi State 12 4-8 33.3% 6-6 5-7 10.3 15.7 -5.3
UL Monroe 12 4-8 33.3% 4-6 1-10-1 9.1 18.5 -9.4
South Carolina 12 4-8 33.3% 6-6 6-6 13.9 14.8 -0.9
Fresno State 13 4-9 30.8% 4-7 7-5-1 15.1 12.2 +2.9
Wisconsin 13 4-9 30.8% 6-6 4-7-2 10.2 12.2 -1.9
Syracuse 13 4-9 30.8% 6-5-1 4-9 11.5 15.4 -3.8
North Carolina 13 4-9 30.8% 7-5 8-4-1 17.7 14.2 +3.5
UCLA 13 4-9 30.8% 4-7 6-7 13.0 10.2 +2.8
Navy 12 3-7-1 30% 3-6 4-6-2 7.7 13.9 -6.3
Oklahoma State 14 4-10 28.6% 7-6 5-9 13.4 17.1 -3.8
Florida State 14 4-10 28.6% 7-5 8-5-1 15.9 12.2 +3.7
Marshall 13 3-8-2 27.3% 7-5 3-9-1 12.0 16.3 -4.3
Massachusetts 12 3-9 25% 5-6 3-8-1 9.1 20.9 -11.8
Temple 12 3-9 25% 4-6 3-9 10.8 18.3 -7.5
Baylor 12 3-9 25% 5-5 3-9 9.8 18.8 -8.9
Illinois 12 3-9 25% 8-2 3-8-1 12.8 16.2 -3.4
TCU 12 2-9-1 18.2% 4-6 6-6 14.8 16.7 -1.9
Vanderbilt 12 1-11 8.3% 6-5 2-10 9.3 19.5 -10.2
Delaware 1 0-1 0% 1-0 0-1 7.0 35.0 -28.0

How it works

Halftime scores come from ESPN quarter scores (Q1 + Q2) for every game since 2015.

1st-half lines. ESPN publishes no college 1st-half lines. Real ones come from The Odds API’s US books (DraftKings first) for games kicking off within about five days (the biggest matchups first, a capped number a day), pulled once, so a line shows the time it was fetched; every other game, and every past college game, is estimated from the full-game closing line (spread × 0.59, total × 0.52, rounded to the half point: the share of the margin and points college teams score before halftime). A real line shows its book; an estimated one is marked “est.”

Projection. The full-game model's margin and total, scaled the same way. The blend was chosen by the lowest walk-forward error.

Spread edge and Total edge. The model’s 1st-half line (total) minus the market’s, in points. A lean starts when the projection beats the 1H line by 2–6 pts (ATS) or 3+ pts (O/U). Shown for context: neither has a proven edge.

Picks and prices. For a game with a posted 1st-half line, tap Pick on its tile to save a 1H spread or total pick (graded on the halftime score; they show in My picks). The game card’s Market tab lists every book’s 1st-half price.

NCAAF first-half betting FAQ

First-half lines, 1H ATS and halftime totals explained

What is a first-half spread in the NCAAF?

A first-half (1H) spread is a point spread graded on the score at halftime only. A team covers the 1st-half spread when its 1st-half margin plus its 1st-half line is positive; the 2nd half and overtime don't count.

How are NCAAF first-half lines set here?

ESPN publishes no college 1st-half lines. Real ones come from The Odds API’s US books (DraftKings first) for games kicking off within about five days (the biggest matchups first, a capped number a day), pulled once, so a line shows the time it was fetched; every other game, and every past college game, is estimated from the full-game closing line (spread × 0.59, total × 0.52, rounded to the half point: the share of the margin and points college teams score before halftime).

How is the 1st-half projection made?

The full-game power-rating model's margin and total are scaled to the first half. Every past week is predicted only from games played before it.

Do the 1st-half leans beat the market?

Not so far. Over 2016–26, 1st-half ATS leans went 1117-1157 (49.1%) and over/under leans 313-299 (51.1%), below or near the 52.4% needed to break even at -110 odds, so they are shown as context only.

How often does the model pick the team leading at halftime?

69.7% of 7,953 NCAAF games in the 2016–26 walk-forward backtest.