NCAAF · 2026 · Weekly recap
Week 6: model vs. final scores
Published Oct 11, 2026
58 games final
Published Oct 11, 2026 · 58 games final

58 games went final in Week 6. Favorites went 24-34 against the spread with 19 outright upsets, games went 26-32 over/under, and our model picked 39 of 58 winners using only data from before each game.

Key takeaways
ATS split: favorites 24-34
Favorites 24-34 ATS (41%) · season 163-161-5 (50%)
19 outright upsets
Biggest: BUFF won as a 18.5-pt underdog, BUFF 23, TOL 8
Totals split 26-32
51.1 pts a game vs a 50.8 avg total · season overs 51%
Line moves were a coin flip: 27-23 ATS
Spread moved in 50 of 58 games · season 147-128-5 (53%)
Totals went the way they moved in 25 of 48
▲ up 17: 8 Over · ▼ down 31: 17 Under
Model picked 39 of 58 winners
67%, margin within 7 pts in 40% of games · season 260-69 (79%)
Model picked winners
67%
straight up · margin within 7 pts in 40% of games
Favorites ATS
41%
underdogs 34-24 · 19 outright upsets
Home teams ATS
56%
straight up 31-26 (neutral sites excluded)
Overs / unders
45%
avg 51.1 pts vs avg total 50.8
Model ATS vs. close
60%
side its projection favored against the closing line
Model O/U picks
33%
over/under side of its Model total
Avg margin miss
11.4 pts
projected vs final margin · total points off by 12.9
Avg winning margin
14.8 pts

Week 6 vs. the season

Season to date: 329 games over 6 weeks, through Week 6. Diff = this week’s rate minus the season’s, in points.
Week 6SeasonDiff
Favorites ATS
24-34
41%
163-161-5
50%
▼9
Favorites straight up
39-19
67%
260-69
79%
▼12
Home teams ATS
32-25
56%
169-148-5
53%
▲3
Overs
26-32
45%
167-162
51%
▼6
Line-move side ATS
27-23
54%
147-128-5
53%
▲1
Totals went the way they moved
25-23
52%
143-134
52%
=
Model winners
39-19
67%
260-69
79%
▼12
Model ATS
30-20
60%
159-141
53%
▲7
Model O/U picks
19-39
33%
164-165
50%
▼17
Points per game
51.1
52.3
▼1.2
Model margin miss (pts)
11.4
11.4
▼0.0

By the spread

Favorites by closing-line size: won straight up, covered the spread
Favored byWonCoveredSeason ATS
Pick–3
13 games
6-7
46%
3-10
23%
29-32-2
48%
3.5–7
17 games
12-5
71%
7-10
41%
37-38-2
49%
7.5–13.5
18 games
12-6
67%
9-9
50%
42-33-1
56%
14+
10 games
9-1
90%
5-5
50%
55-58
49%

Line movement

Opening line to closing line, and whether following the market’s move paid off
Spreads
Lines moved
50 of 58
closed at a different spread than they opened
Team the line moved toward
27-23 ATS
covered 54% of the time
Biggest moves · badge: did that team cover?
Totals
▲ Moved up 1+ pt
8 Over, 9 Under
▼ Moved down 1+ pt
17 Under, 14 Over
The result went the way the total moved in 25 of 48 games (52%).
Biggest moves

Projection vs. result

Each dot is a game (hover for the score, click for the game card). On the dashed line = the model was exact. Green = model got the winner (left) or the total side (right); red = it missed.
Home margin
-50-50 -40-40 -30-30 -20-20 -10-10 00 1010 2020 3030 4040 5050 Projected Actual JXST @ KENN: projected KENN -2, actual KENN -1NMSU @ FIU: projected FIU +8, actual FIU +19SHSU @ LIB: projected LIB +14, actual LIB +32MOST @ WKU: projected WKU -1, actual WKU +21USF @ UTSA: projected UTSA +5, actual UTSA +7USA @ ARST: projected ARST +3, actual ARST -7FSU @ LOU: projected LOU +4, actual LOU +24IOWA @ WASH: projected WASH +3, actual WASH -17WSU @ USU: projected USU +4, actual USU +1WYO @ SJSU: projected SJSU +5, actual SJSU -3ISU @ BYU: projected BYU +12, actual BYU +14IU @ NEB: projected NEB -9, actual NEB -3TA&M @ MIZ: projected MIZ +4, actual MIZ +21UCF @ OKST: projected OKST +10, actual OKST +14UNC @ PITT: projected PITT +5, actual PITT -4ARIZ @ WVU: projected WVU -4, actual WVU -21WAKE @ NCSU: projected NCSU -3, actual NCSU -24TULN @ ARMY: projected ARMY +5, actual ARMY +3SAC @ BGSU: projected BGSU +10, actual BGSU +28BALL @ NU: projected NU +35, actual NU +31SC @ FLA: projected FLA +10, actual FLA -19RICE @ ECU: projected ECU +10, actual ECU +16ODU @ APP: projected APP +9, actual APP -7M-OH @ MASS: projected MASS -6, actual MASS -1TEX @ OU: projected OU -8, actual OU +3STAN @ ND: projected ND +41, actual ND +51MISS @ VAN: projected VAN -8, actual VAN -35UCLA @ ORE: projected ORE +11, actual ORE -2HOU @ KSU: projected KSU +2, actual KSU -19DUKE @ GT: projected GT -4, actual GT +3VT @ CAL: projected CAL -11, actual CAL +5ILL @ MSU: projected MSU -2, actual MSU -1CLT @ UNT: projected UNT +28, actual UNT +40TLSA @ NAVY: projected NAVY +2, actual NAVY +8EMU @ AKR: projected AKR -4, actual AKR -2BUFF @ TOL: projected TOL +20, actual TOL -15CMU @ OHIO: projected OHIO +3, actual OHIO +17KENT @ WMU: projected WMU +14, actual WMU +31CONN @ TEM: projected TEM +3, actual TEM -14MD @ OSU: projected OSU +31, actual OSU +29TENN @ ARK: projected ARK -14, actual ARK -7SDSU @ ORST: projected ORST +14, actual ORST +52LSU @ UK: projected UK -9, actual UK +1UAB @ MEM: projected MEM +16, actual MEM +25NEV @ UTEP: projected UTEP -9, actual UTEP -17NDSU @ UNLV: projected UNLV -2, actual UNLV +6CCU @ MRSH: projected MRSH +4, actual MRSH -6UGA @ ALA: projected ALA +3, actual ALA -3USC @ PSU: projected PSU -1, actual PSU -8SYR @ UVA: projected UVA +13, actual UVA +3AFA @ NIU: projected NIU -7, actual NIU -21UL @ LT: projected LT +3, actual LT +1KU @ UTAH: projected UTAH +16, actual UTAH +17MINN @ PUR: projected PUR -2, actual PUR +28JMU @ GASO: projected GASO -8, actual GASO -3BOIS @ FRES: projected FRES -8, actual FRES -7HAW @ ASU: projected ASU +21, actual ASU +18
Total points
2020 3030 4040 5050 6060 7070 8080 9090 100100 Projected Actual USM @ TROY: projected 50, actual 89JXST @ KENN: projected 50, actual 53NMSU @ FIU: projected 46, actual 25SHSU @ LIB: projected 52, actual 38MOST @ WKU: projected 57, actual 47USF @ UTSA: projected 53, actual 55USA @ ARST: projected 59, actual 105FSU @ LOU: projected 60, actual 64IOWA @ WASH: projected 43, actual 65WSU @ USU: projected 46, actual 33WYO @ SJSU: projected 43, actual 29ISU @ BYU: projected 48, actual 34IU @ NEB: projected 51, actual 37TA&M @ MIZ: projected 50, actual 33UCF @ OKST: projected 50, actual 70UNC @ PITT: projected 49, actual 38ARIZ @ WVU: projected 58, actual 83WAKE @ NCSU: projected 55, actual 52TULN @ ARMY: projected 47, actual 37SAC @ BGSU: projected 44, actual 48BALL @ NU: projected 51, actual 59SC @ FLA: projected 60, actual 57RICE @ ECU: projected 46, actual 40ODU @ APP: projected 47, actual 13M-OH @ MASS: projected 50, actual 39TEX @ OU: projected 38, actual 51STAN @ ND: projected 53, actual 65MISS @ VAN: projected 58, actual 69UCLA @ ORE: projected 59, actual 32HOU @ KSU: projected 52, actual 51DUKE @ GT: projected 50, actual 53VT @ CAL: projected 53, actual 45ILL @ MSU: projected 48, actual 75CLT @ UNT: projected 58, actual 60TLSA @ NAVY: projected 44, actual 60EMU @ AKR: projected 54, actual 48BUFF @ TOL: projected 56, actual 31CMU @ OHIO: projected 49, actual 45KENT @ WMU: projected 42, actual 45CONN @ TEM: projected 55, actual 54MD @ OSU: projected 55, actual 61TENN @ ARK: projected 56, actual 41SDSU @ ORST: projected 50, actual 80LSU @ UK: projected 49, actual 69UAB @ MEM: projected 56, actual 51NEV @ UTEP: projected 51, actual 43NDSU @ UNLV: projected 48, actual 20CCU @ MRSH: projected 56, actual 48UGA @ ALA: projected 57, actual 37USC @ PSU: projected 57, actual 54SYR @ UVA: projected 49, actual 53AFA @ NIU: projected 49, actual 35UL @ LT: projected 51, actual 63KU @ UTAH: projected 54, actual 65MINN @ PUR: projected 52, actual 54JMU @ GASO: projected 54, actual 51BOIS @ FRES: projected 46, actual 69HAW @ ASU: projected 51, actual 42

Highlights

Model's closest calls
Biggest misses

Upsets & covers

Outright upsets
Biggest covers
Closest finishes · 16 decided by 3 or fewer
Highest scoring: USA 56, ARST 49 (105). Lowest: ODU 10, APP 3 (13).

Every game: projected vs. final

ProjectedFinal
Showing · Show all games
USM @ TROY· TROY -9.5 · O/U 51.5scores off 14 / 25
Southern Miss
Proj20
Final34
Troy
Proj30
Final55
Line TROY -8.5 → TROY -9.5 (1 toward TROY, covered)·Total 48.5 → 51.5 ▲3
TROY W O89 vs 51.5 Model TROY ✓
JXST @ KENN· JXST -3 · O/U 48.5scores off 1 / 2
Jacksonville State
Proj26
Final27
Kennesaw State
Proj24
Final26
Line JXST -2.5 → JXST -3 (0.5 toward JXST, didn’t cover)
KENN W O53 vs 48.5 Model JXST ✓
NMSU @ FIU· FIU -7 · O/U 46.5scores off 16 / 5
New Mexico State
Proj19
Final3
Florida International
Proj27
Final22
Line FIU -3.5 → FIU -7 (3.5 toward FIU, covered)·Total 47.5 → 46.5 ▼1
FIU W U25 vs 46.5 Model FIU ✓
SHSU @ LIB· LIB -13.5 · O/U 52.5scores off 16 / 2
Sam Houston
Proj19
Final3
Liberty
Proj33
Final35
LIB W U38 vs 52.5 Model LIB ✓
MOST @ WKU· MOST -1.5 · O/U 56.5scores off 16 / 6
Missouri State
Proj29
Final13
Western Kentucky
Proj28
Final34
WKU W U47 vs 56.5 Model MOST ✗ Upset
USF @ UTSA· UTSA -5.5 · O/U 49.5scores off 0 / 2
South Florida
Proj24
Final24
UTSA
Proj29
Final31
Line UTSA -6.5 → UTSA -5.5 (1 toward USF, didn’t cover)·Total 55.5 → 49.5 ▼6
UTSA W O55 vs 49.5 Model UTSA ✓
USA @ ARST· ARST -3 · O/U 60.5scores off 28 / 18
South Alabama
Proj28
Final56
Arkansas State
Proj31
Final49
Line ARST -1.5 → ARST -3 (1.5 toward ARST, didn’t cover)·Total 56.5 → 60.5 ▲4
USA W O105 vs 60.5 Model ARST ✗ Upset
FSU @ LOU· LOU -4 · O/U 60.5scores off 8 / 12
Florida State
Proj28
Final20
Louisville
Proj32
Final44
Line LOU -7.5 → LOU -4 (3.5 toward FSU, didn’t cover)·Total 58.5 → 60.5 ▲2
LOU W O64 vs 60.5 Model LOU ✓
IOWA @ WASH· WASH -3 · O/U 41.5scores off 21 / 1
Iowa
Proj20
Final41
Washington
Proj23
Final24
Line WASH -1.5 → WASH -3 (1.5 toward WASH, didn’t cover)
IOWA W O65 vs 41.5 Model WASH ✗ Upset
WSU @ USU· USU -4 · O/U 44.5scores off 5 / 8
Washington State
Proj21
Final16
Utah State
Proj25
Final17
Line USU -3 → USU -4 (1 toward USU, didn’t cover)
WSU W U33 vs 44.5 Model USU ✓
WYO @ SJSU· SJSU -4.5 · O/U 42.5scores off 3 / 11
Wyoming
Proj19
Final16
San José State
Proj24
Final13
Line SJSU -6 → SJSU -4.5 (1.5 toward WYO, covered)·Total 44.5 → 42.5 ▼2
WYO W U29 vs 42.5 Model SJSU ✗ Upset
ISU @ BYU· BYU -11.5 · O/U 46.5scores off 8 / 6
Iowa State
Proj18
Final10
BYU
Proj30
Final24
Line BYU -14.5 → BYU -11.5 (3 toward ISU, didn’t cover)·Total 50.5 → 46.5 ▼4
BYU W U34 vs 46.5 Model BYU ✓
IU @ NEB· IU -9.5 · O/U 48.5scores off 10 / 4
Indiana
Proj30
Final20
Nebraska
Proj21
Final17
Total 50.5 → 48.5 ▼2
NEB W U37 vs 48.5 Model IU ✓
TA&M @ MIZ· MIZ -4.5 · O/U 50.5scores off 17 / 0
Texas A&M
Proj23
Final6
Missouri
Proj27
Final27
Line MIZ -1.5 → MIZ -4.5 (3 toward MIZ, covered)
MIZ W U33 vs 50.5 Model MIZ ✓
UCF @ OKST· OKST -10.5 · O/U 53.5scores off 8 / 12
UCF
Proj20
Final28
Oklahoma State
Proj30
Final42
Line OKST -10 → OKST -10.5 (0.5 toward OKST, covered)·Total 52.5 → 53.5 ▲1
OKST W O70 vs 53.5 Model OKST ✓
UNC @ PITT· PITT -3.5 · O/U 47.5scores off 1 / 10
North Carolina
Proj22
Final21
Pittsburgh
Proj27
Final17
Line PITT -4.5 → PITT -3.5 (1 toward UNC, covered)·Total 46.5 → 47.5 ▲1
UNC W U38 vs 47.5 Model PITT ✗ Upset
ARIZ @ WVU· ARIZ -3.5 · O/U 61.5scores off 21 / 4
Arizona
Proj31
Final52
West Virginia
Proj27
Final31
Line ARIZ -3 → ARIZ -3.5 (0.5 toward ARIZ, covered)·Total 58.5 → 61.5 ▲3
ARIZ W O83 vs 61.5 Model ARIZ ✓
WAKE @ NCSU· WAKE -4 · O/U 56.5scores off 9 / 12
Wake Forest
Proj29
Final38
NC State
Proj26
Final14
Line WAKE -2.5 → WAKE -4 (1.5 toward WAKE, covered)·Total 60.5 → 56.5 ▼4
WAKE W U52 vs 56.5 Model WAKE ✓
TULN @ ARMY· ARMY -5.5 · O/U 48.5scores off 4 / 6
Tulane
Proj21
Final17
Army
Proj26
Final20
Line ARMY -6.5 → ARMY -5.5 (1 toward TULN, covered)·Total 44.5 → 48.5 ▲4
TULN W U37 vs 48.5 Model ARMY ✓
SAC @ BGSU· BGSU -9.5 · O/U 43.5scores off 7 / 11
Sacramento State
Proj17
Final10
Bowling Green
Proj27
Final38
Line BGSU -6.5 → BGSU -9.5 (3 toward BGSU, covered)·Total 46.5 → 43.5 ▼3
BGSU W O48 vs 43.5 Model BGSU ✓
BALL @ NU· NU -34.5 · O/U 53.5scores off 6 / 2
Ball State
Proj8
Final14
Northwestern
Proj43
Final45
Total 52.5 → 53.5 ▲1
BALL W O59 vs 53.5 Model NU ✓
SC @ FLA· FLA -10.5 · O/U 59.5scores off 13 / 16
South Carolina
Proj25
Final38
Florida
Proj35
Final19
Line FLA -14.5 → FLA -10.5 (4 toward SC, covered)·Total 57.5 → 59.5 ▲2
SC W U57 vs 59.5 Model FLA ✗ Upset
RICE @ ECU· ECU -10 · O/U 46.5scores off 6 / 0
Rice
Proj18
Final12
East Carolina
Proj28
Final28
Line ECU -9.5 → ECU -10 (0.5 toward ECU, covered)·Total 50.5 → 46.5 ▼4
ECU W U40 vs 46.5 Model ECU ✓
ODU @ APP· APP -8.5 · O/U 45.5scores off 9 / 25
Old Dominion
Proj19
Final10
App State
Proj28
Final3
Line APP -5.5 → APP -8.5 (3 toward APP, didn’t cover)·Total 51.5 → 45.5 ▼6
ODU W U13 vs 45.5 Model APP ✗ Upset
M-OH @ MASS· M-OH -6 · O/U 44.5scores off 8 / 3
Miami (OH)
Proj28
Final20
Massachusetts
Proj22
Final19
Line M-OH -2.5 → M-OH -6 (3.5 toward M-OH, didn’t cover)·Total 49.5 → 44.5 ▼5
MASS W U39 vs 44.5 Model M-OH ✓
TEX vs OU· TEX -7.5 · O/U 40.5scores off 1 / 12
Texas
Proj23
Final24
Oklahoma
Proj15
Final27
Line TEX -6 → TEX -7.5 (1.5 toward TEX, didn’t cover)·Total 48.5 → 40.5 ▼8
OU W O51 vs 40.5 Model TEX ✗ Upset
STAN @ ND· ND -40.5 · O/U 55.5scores off 1 / 11
Stanford
Proj6
Final7
Notre Dame
Proj47
Final58
Line ND -35.5 → ND -40.5 (5 toward ND, covered)
ND W O65 vs 55.5 Model ND ✓
MISS @ VAN· MISS -9.5 · O/U 54.5scores off 19 / 8
Ole Miss
Proj33
Final52
Vanderbilt
Proj25
Final17
Line MISS -10.5 → MISS -9.5 (1 toward VAN, didn’t cover)·Total 57.5 → 54.5 ▼3
MISS W O69 vs 54.5 Model MISS ✓
UCLA @ ORE· ORE -10 · O/U 57.5scores off 7 / 20
UCLA
Proj24
Final17
Oregon
Proj35
Final15
Line ORE -12.5 → ORE -10 (2.5 toward UCLA, covered)·Total 60.5 → 57.5 ▼3
UCLA W U32 vs 57.5 Model ORE ✗ Upset
HOU @ KSU· KSU -2.5 · O/U 55.5scores off 10 / 11
Houston
Proj25
Final35
Kansas State
Proj27
Final16
Total 54.5 → 55.5 ▲1
HOU W U51 vs 55.5 Model KSU ✗ Upset
DUKE @ GT· DUKE -4.5 · O/U 45.5scores off 2 / 5
Duke
Proj27
Final25
Georgia Tech
Proj23
Final28
Line DUKE -6.5 → DUKE -4.5 (2 toward GT, covered)·Total 50.5 → 45.5 ▼5
GT W O53 vs 45.5 Model DUKE ✗ Upset
VT @ CAL· VT -11.5 · O/U 51.5scores off 12 / 4
Virginia Tech
Proj32
Final20
California
Proj21
Final25
Line VT -10.5 → VT -11.5 (1 toward VT, didn’t cover)·Total 52.5 → 51.5 ▼1
CAL W U45 vs 51.5 Model VT ✗ Upset
ILL @ MSU· ILL -2.5 · O/U 48.5scores off 13 / 14
Illinois
Proj25
Final38
Michigan State
Proj23
Final37
Line ILL -3 → ILL -2.5 (0.5 toward MSU, covered)·Total 50.5 → 48.5 ▼2
MSU W O75 vs 48.5 Model ILL ✓
CLT @ UNT· UNT -27.5 · O/U 58.5scores off 5 / 7
Charlotte
Proj15
Final10
North Texas
Proj43
Final50
Line UNT -23.5 → UNT -27.5 (4 toward UNT, covered)·Total 62.5 → 58.5 ▼4
UNT W O60 vs 58.5 Model UNT ✓
TLSA @ NAVY· NAVY -3 · O/U 47.5scores off 5 / 11
Tulsa
Proj21
Final26
Navy
Proj23
Final34
Total 52.5 → 47.5 ▼5
NAVY W O60 vs 47.5 Model NAVY ✓
EMU @ AKR· EMU -4.5 · O/U 51.5scores off 4 / 2
Eastern Michigan
Proj29
Final25
Akron
Proj25
Final23
Line EMU -3.5 → EMU -4.5 (1 toward EMU, didn’t cover)·Total 50.5 → 51.5 ▲1
AKR W U48 vs 51.5 Model EMU ✓
BUFF @ TOL· TOL -18.5 · O/U 54.5scores off 5 / 30
Buffalo
Proj18
Final23
Toledo
Proj38
Final8
Line TOL -19.5 → TOL -18.5 (1 toward BUFF, covered)·Total 55.5 → 54.5 ▼1
BUFF W U31 vs 54.5 Model TOL ✗ Upset
CMU @ OHIO· OHIO -2.5 · O/U 45.5scores off 9 / 5
Central Michigan
Proj23
Final14
Ohio
Proj26
Final31
Line OHIO -3.5 → OHIO -2.5 (1 toward CMU, didn’t cover)·Total 48.5 → 45.5 ▼3
OHIO W U45 vs 45.5 Model OHIO ✓
KENT @ WMU· WMU -13.5 · O/U 43.5scores off 7 / 10
Kent State
Proj14
Final7
Western Michigan
Proj28
Final38
Line WMU -15.5 → WMU -13.5 (2 toward KENT, didn’t cover)·Total 48.5 → 43.5 ▼5
WMU W O45 vs 43.5 Model WMU ✓
CONN @ TEM· TEM -3.5 · O/U 55.5scores off 8 / 9
UConn
Proj26
Final34
Temple
Proj29
Final20
Line TEM -3 → TEM -3.5 (0.5 toward TEM, didn’t cover)·Total 53.5 → 55.5 ▲2
CONN W U54 vs 55.5 Model TEM ✗ Upset
MD @ OSU· OSU -31.5 · O/U 56.5scores off 4 / 2
Maryland
Proj12
Final16
Ohio State
Proj43
Final45
Line OSU -37.5 → OSU -31.5 (6 toward MD, covered)·Total 54.5 → 56.5 ▲2
MD W O61 vs 56.5 Model OSU ✓
TENN @ ARK· TENN -13.5 · O/U 51.5scores off 11 / 4
Tennessee
Proj35
Final24
Arkansas
Proj21
Final17
Line TENN -14 → TENN -13.5 (0.5 toward ARK, covered)·Total 49.5 → 51.5 ▲2
ARK W U41 vs 51.5 Model TENN ✓
SDSU @ ORST· ORST -14.5 · O/U 52.5scores off 4 / 34
San Diego State
Proj18
Final14
Oregon State
Proj32
Final66
Line ORST -13.5 → ORST -14.5 (1 toward ORST, covered)·Total 57.5 → 52.5 ▼5
ORST W O80 vs 52.5 Model ORST ✓
LSU @ UK· LSU -9.5 · O/U 50.5scores off 5 / 15
LSU
Proj29
Final34
Kentucky
Proj20
Final35
Line LSU -10.5 → LSU -9.5 (1 toward UK, covered)·Total 49.5 → 50.5 ▲1
UK W O69 vs 50.5 Model LSU ✗ Upset
UAB @ MEM· MEM -15.5 · O/U 55.5scores off 7 / 2
UAB
Proj20
Final13
Memphis
Proj36
Final38
Line MEM -14 → MEM -15.5 (1.5 toward MEM, covered)·Total 59.5 → 55.5 ▼4
MEM W U51 vs 55.5 Model MEM ✓
NEV @ UTEP· NEV -10 · O/U 48.5scores off 0 / 8
Nevada
Proj30
Final30
UTEP
Proj21
Final13
Line NEV -9.5 → NEV -10 (0.5 toward NEV, covered)·Total 52.5 → 48.5 ▼4
NEV W U43 vs 48.5 Model NEV ✓
NDSU @ UNLV· NDSU -3 · O/U 47.5scores off 18 / 10
North Dakota State
Proj25
Final7
UNLV
Proj23
Final13
Line NDSU -4 → NDSU -3 (1 toward UNLV, covered)·Total 49.5 → 47.5 ▼2
UNLV W U20 vs 47.5 Model NDSU ✗ Upset
CCU @ MRSH· MRSH -4.5 · O/U 57.5scores off 1 / 9
Coastal Carolina
Proj26
Final27
Marshall
Proj30
Final21
Line MRSH -2.5 → MRSH -4.5 (2 toward MRSH, didn’t cover)·Total 55.5 → 57.5 ▲2
CCU W U48 vs 57.5 Model MRSH ✗ Upset
UGA @ ALA· ALA -2.5 · O/U 51.5scores off 7 / 13
Georgia
Proj27
Final20
Alabama
Proj30
Final17
Line UGA -3 → ALA -2.5 (5.5 toward ALA, didn’t cover)
UGA W U37 vs 51.5 Model ALA ✗ Upset
USC @ PSU· USC -1.5 · O/U 54.5scores off 2 / 5
USC
Proj29
Final31
Penn State
Proj28
Final23
Total 56.5 → 54.5 ▼2
USC W U54 vs 54.5 Model USC ✓
SYR @ UVA· UVA -14 · O/U 49.5scores off 7 / 3
Syracuse
Proj18
Final25
Virginia
Proj31
Final28
Line UVA -8.5 → UVA -14 (5.5 toward UVA, didn’t cover)·Total 50.5 → 49.5 ▼1
SYR W O53 vs 49.5 Model UVA ✓
AFA @ NIU· AFA -7 · O/U 48.5scores off 0 / 14
Air Force
Proj28
Final28
Northern Illinois
Proj21
Final7
Line AFA -12.5 → AFA -7 (5.5 toward NIU, didn’t cover)·Total 47.5 → 48.5 ▲1
AFA W U35 vs 48.5 Model AFA ✓
UL @ LT· LT -3 · O/U 48.5scores off 7 / 5
Louisiana
Proj24
Final31
Louisiana Tech
Proj27
Final32
Line LT -2.5 → LT -3 (0.5 toward LT, didn’t cover)·Total 50.5 → 48.5 ▼2
UL W O63 vs 48.5 Model LT ✓
KU @ UTAH· UTAH -15.5 · O/U 49.5scores off 5 / 6
Kansas
Proj19
Final24
Utah
Proj35
Final41
Line UTAH -16.5 → UTAH -15.5 (1 toward KU, didn’t cover)·Total 52.5 → 49.5 ▼3
UTAH W O65 vs 49.5 Model UTAH ✓
MINN @ PUR· MINN -2.5 · O/U 48.5scores off 14 / 16
Minnesota
Proj27
Final13
Purdue
Proj25
Final41
Line MINN -4.5 → MINN -2.5 (2 toward PUR, covered)·Total 49.5 → 48.5 ▼1
PUR W O54 vs 48.5 Model MINN ✗ Upset
JMU @ GASO· JMU -7 · O/U 51.5scores off 4 / 1
James Madison
Proj31
Final27
Georgia Southern
Proj23
Final24
Line JMU -10 → JMU -7 (3 toward GASO, covered)·Total 53.5 → 51.5 ▼2
GASO W U51 vs 51.5 Model JMU ✓
BOIS @ FRES· BOIS -8.5 · O/U 48.5scores off 11 / 12
Boise State
Proj27
Final38
Fresno State
Proj19
Final31
Line BOIS -7.5 → BOIS -8.5 (1 toward BOIS, didn’t cover)
FRES W O69 vs 48.5 Model BOIS ✓
HAW @ ASU· ASU -20.5 · O/U 51.5scores off 3 / 6
Hawai'i
Proj15
Final12
Arizona State
Proj36
Final30
HAW W U42 vs 51.5 Model ASU ✓
Projections are the model's walk-forward numbers: each game uses ratings from before its week, the same figures shown on the game cards. ATS and totals use the closing line.