NCAAF · 2026 · Weekly recap
Week 7: model vs. final scores
Published Oct 18, 2026
59 games final
Published Oct 18, 2026 · 59 games final

59 games went final in Week 7. Favorites went 27-30-2 against the spread with 18 outright upsets, games went 31-28 over/under, and our model picked 41 of 59 winners using only data from before each game.

Key takeaways
ATS split: favorites 27-30-2
Favorites 27-30-2 ATS (47%) · season 190-191-7 (50%)
18 outright upsets
Biggest: AUB won as a 19.5-pt underdog, AUB 27, UGA 24
Totals split 31-28
50.8 pts a game vs a 50.7 avg total · season overs 51%
Line moves were a coin flip: 29-22-1 ATS
Spread moved in 52 of 59 games · season 176-150-6 (54%)
Totals went the way they moved in 30 of 54
▲ up 24: 14 Over · ▼ down 30: 16 Under
Model picked 41 of 59 winners
69%, margin within 7 pts in 41% of games · season 301-87 (78%)
Model picked winners
69%
straight up · margin within 7 pts in 41% of games
Favorites ATS
47%
underdogs 30-27-2 · 18 outright upsets
Home teams ATS
51%
straight up 33-26 (neutral sites excluded)
Overs / unders
53%
avg 50.8 pts vs avg total 50.7
Model ATS vs. close
50%
side its projection favored against the closing line
Model O/U picks
49%
over/under side of its Model total
Avg margin miss
10.7 pts
projected vs final margin · total points off by 12.9
Avg winning margin
12.6 pts

Week 7 vs. the season

Season to date: 388 games over 7 weeks, through Week 7. Diff = this week’s rate minus the season’s, in points.
Week 7SeasonDiff
Favorites ATS
27-30-2
47%
190-191-7
50%
▼3
Favorites straight up
41-18
69%
301-87
78%
▼9
Home teams ATS
29-28-2
51%
198-176-7
53%
▼2
Overs
31-28
53%
198-190
51%
▲2
Line-move side ATS
29-22-1
57%
176-150-6
54%
▲3
Totals went the way they moved
30-24
56%
173-158
52%
▲4
Model winners
41-18
69%
301-87
78%
▼9
Model ATS
25-25
50%
184-166
53%
▼3
Model O/U picks
29-30
49%
193-195
50%
▼1
Points per game
50.8
52.0
▼1.2
Model margin miss (pts)
10.7
11.3
▼0.6

By the spread

Favorites by closing-line size: won straight up, covered the spread
Favored byWonCoveredSeason ATS
Pick–3
15 games
11-4
73%
10-4-1
71%
39-36-3
52%
3.5–7
19 games
10-9
53%
6-13
32%
43-51-2
46%
7.5–13.5
12 games
9-3
75%
6-5-1
55%
48-38-2
56%
14+
13 games
11-2
85%
5-8
38%
60-66
48%

Line movement

Opening line to closing line, and whether following the market’s move paid off
Spreads
Lines moved
52 of 59
closed at a different spread than they opened
Team the line moved toward
29-22-1 ATS
covered 57% of the time
Biggest moves · badge: did that team cover?
Totals
▲ Moved up 1+ pt
14 Over, 10 Under
▼ Moved down 1+ pt
16 Under, 14 Over
The result went the way the total moved in 30 of 54 games (56%).
Biggest moves

Projection vs. result

Each dot is a game (hover for the score, click for the game card). On the dashed line = the model was exact. Green = model got the winner (left) or the total side (right); red = it missed.
Home margin
-50-50 -40-40 -30-30 -20-20 -10-10 00 1010 2020 3030 4040 5050 Projected Actual FIU @ JXST: projected JXST +3, actual JXST +3KENN @ MOST: projected MOST -2, actual MOST +3WKU @ SHSU: projected SHSU -1, actual SHSU -13ECU @ UAB: projected UAB -6, actual UAB +13GASO @ ODU: projected ODU -3, actual ODU -8CSU @ TXST: projected TXST +15, actual TXST +39MEM @ TULN: projected TULN -7, actual TULN +14WASH @ PUR: projected PUR +2, actual PUR -12APP @ CCU: projected CCU -2, actual CCU -3OSU @ IU: projected IU -3, actual IU -4FLA @ TEX: projected TEX +14, actual TEX -3MSST @ LSU: projected LSU +17, actual LSU +31UVA @ SMU: projected SMU +10, actual SMU +10NU @ MSU: projected MSU -7, actual MSU -3CIN @ WVU: projected WVU +1, actual WVU +3KU @ KSU: projected KSU +3, actual KSU +11PITT @ BC: projected BC -8, actual BC +6FAU @ ARMY: projected ARMY +3, actual ARMY +32BALL @ BGSU: projected BGSU +7, actual BGSU -1GAST @ JMU: projected JMU +8, actual JMU +27RUTG @ MD: projected MD +6, actual MD -7CLT @ TEM: projected TEM +18, actual TEM -7MASS @ BUFF: projected BUFF +5, actual BUFF +7WMU @ CMU: projected CMU -8, actual CMU -7AUB @ UGA: projected UGA +20, actual UGA -3ALA @ TENN: projected TENN -7, actual TENN +16MIZ @ MISS: projected MISS +4, actual MISS +28ASU @ TTU: projected TTU +17, actual TTU +28GT @ VT: projected VT +9, actual VT +10UNC @ DUKE: projected DUKE +4, actual DUKE -4PSU @ MICH: projected MICH +5, actual MICH +3NIU @ WYO: projected WYO +8, actual WYO +18UNLV @ AFA: projected AFA +2, actual AFA +10TOL @ EMU: projected EMU -8, actual EMU -20AKR @ M-OH: projected M-OH +10, actual M-OH +20TLSA @ RICE: projected RICE -4, actual RICE -21TROY @ UL: projected UL +3, actual UL +27WSU @ ORST: projected ORST +18, actual ORST +18FSU @ MIA: projected MIA +20, actual MIA +8ARK @ VAN: projected VAN +5, actual VAN -10TCU @ BAY: projected BAY +4, actual BAY -11KENT @ USF: projected USF +20, actual USF +27NEV @ NDSU: projected NDSU +15, actual NDSU +14ARST @ USM: projected USM -5, actual USM -10ND @ BYU: projected BYU -10, actual BYU +4WIS @ UCLA: projected UCLA +3, actual UCLA +10UK @ OU: projected OU +7, actual OU -8OKST @ HOU: projected HOU +6, actual HOU +3LOU @ SYR: projected SYR -13, actual SYR -8NAVY @ UTSA: projected UTSA +7, actual UTSA +4LT @ ULM: projected ULM -14, actual ULM -24SJSU @ UTEP: projected UTEP -7, actual UTEP -13OHIO @ SAC: projected SAC -16, actual SAC -41UTAH @ COLO: projected COLO -16, actual COLO -3WAKE @ CAL: projected CAL -10, actual CAL -34FRES @ SDSU: projected SDSU -7, actual SDSU +3UNM @ HAW: projected HAW -14, actual HAW -11NEB @ ORE: projected ORE +7, actual ORE +3
Total points
2020 3030 4040 5050 6060 7070 8080 9090 100100 Projected Actual DEL @ MTSU: projected 53, actual 63FIU @ JXST: projected 45, actual 51KENN @ MOST: projected 54, actual 45WKU @ SHSU: projected 53, actual 19ECU @ UAB: projected 50, actual 47GASO @ ODU: projected 47, actual 38CSU @ TXST: projected 69, actual 93MEM @ TULN: projected 49, actual 48WASH @ PUR: projected 54, actual 64APP @ CCU: projected 52, actual 67OSU @ IU: projected 53, actual 34FLA @ TEX: projected 54, actual 51MSST @ LSU: projected 57, actual 31UVA @ SMU: projected 52, actual 36NU @ MSU: projected 49, actual 45CIN @ WVU: projected 59, actual 87KU @ KSU: projected 55, actual 59PITT @ BC: projected 42, actual 48FAU @ ARMY: projected 57, actual 80BALL @ BGSU: projected 49, actual 63GAST @ JMU: projected 54, actual 71RUTG @ MD: projected 54, actual 67CLT @ TEM: projected 48, actual 69MASS @ BUFF: projected 47, actual 43WMU @ CMU: projected 42, actual 35AUB @ UGA: projected 48, actual 51ALA @ TENN: projected 53, actual 36MIZ @ MISS: projected 52, actual 34ASU @ TTU: projected 51, actual 78GT @ VT: projected 53, actual 58UNC @ DUKE: projected 44, actual 44PSU @ MICH: projected 45, actual 39NIU @ WYO: projected 40, actual 64UNLV @ AFA: projected 48, actual 72TOL @ EMU: projected 54, actual 48AKR @ M-OH: projected 52, actual 48TLSA @ RICE: projected 46, actual 55TROY @ UL: projected 47, actual 39WSU @ ORST: projected 48, actual 78FSU @ MIA: projected 58, actual 78ARK @ VAN: projected 51, actual 52TCU @ BAY: projected 50, actual 23KENT @ USF: projected 46, actual 31NEV @ NDSU: projected 47, actual 48ARST @ USM: projected 57, actual 36ND @ BYU: projected 50, actual 52WIS @ UCLA: projected 47, actual 24UK @ OU: projected 45, actual 34OKST @ HOU: projected 58, actual 67LOU @ SYR: projected 57, actual 60NAVY @ UTSA: projected 53, actual 72LT @ ULM: projected 54, actual 24SJSU @ UTEP: projected 51, actual 35OHIO @ SAC: projected 50, actual 55UTAH @ COLO: projected 50, actual 51WAKE @ CAL: projected 54, actual 48FRES @ SDSU: projected 45, actual 49UNM @ HAW: projected 48, actual 31NEB @ ORE: projected 55, actual 31

Highlights

Model's closest calls
Biggest misses
  • WKU 16, SHSU 3 · projected 27-26 · WKU off by 11, SHSU off by 23
  • LT 24, ULM 0 · projected 34-20 · LT off by 10, ULM off by 20
  • WSU 30, ORST 48 · projected 15-33 · WSU off by 15, ORST off by 15 (margin exact)

Upsets & covers

Outright upsets
Biggest covers
Closest finishes · 14 decided by 3 or fewer
Highest scoring: CSU 27, TXST 66 (93). Lowest: WKU 16, SHSU 3 (19).

Every game: projected vs. final

ProjectedFinal
Showing · Show all games
DEL @ MTSU· DEL -1.5 · O/U 49.5scores off 3 / 7
Delaware
Proj27
Final30
Middle Tennessee
Proj26
Final33
Total 48.5 → 49.5 ▲1
MTSU W O63 vs 49.5 Model DEL ✗ Upset
FIU @ JXST· JXST -3 · O/U 44.5scores off 3 / 3
Florida International
Proj21
Final24
Jacksonville State
Proj24
Final27
Total 45.5 → 44.5 ▼1
P O51 vs 44.5 Model JXST ✓
KENN @ MOST· KENN -2.5 · O/U 52.5scores off 7 / 2
Kennesaw State
Proj28
Final21
Missouri State
Proj26
Final24
Line KENN -3 → KENN -2.5 (0.5 toward MOST, covered)·Total 50.5 → 52.5 ▲2
MOST W U45 vs 52.5 Model KENN ✗ Upset
WKU @ SHSU· WKU -1.5 · O/U 53.5scores off 11 / 23
Western Kentucky
Proj27
Final16
Sam Houston
Proj26
Final3
Total 51.5 → 53.5 ▲2
WKU W U19 vs 53.5 Model WKU ✓
ECU @ UAB· ECU -5.5 · O/U 49.5scores off 11 / 8
East Carolina
Proj28
Final17
UAB
Proj22
Final30
Line ECU -6.5 → ECU -5.5 (1 toward UAB, covered)·Total 53.5 → 49.5 ▼4
UAB W U47 vs 49.5 Model ECU ✗ Upset
GASO @ ODU· GASO -3 · O/U 44.5scores off 2 / 7
Georgia Southern
Proj25
Final23
Old Dominion
Proj22
Final15
Line GASO -2.5 → GASO -3 (0.5 toward GASO, covered)·Total 49.5 → 44.5 ▼5
GASO W U38 vs 44.5 Model GASO ✓
CSU @ TXST· TXST -15.5 · O/U 69.5scores off 0 / 24
Colorado State
Proj27
Final27
Texas State
Proj42
Final66
Line TXST -12.5 → TXST -15.5 (3 toward TXST, covered)·Total 67.5 → 69.5 ▲2
TXST W O93 vs 69.5 Model TXST ✓
MEM @ TULN· MEM -6.5 · O/U 55.5scores off 11 / 10
Memphis
Proj28
Final17
Tulane
Proj21
Final31
Line MEM -7 → MEM -6.5 (0.5 toward TULN, covered)·Total 53.5 → 55.5 ▲2
TULN W U48 vs 55.5 Model MEM ✗ Upset
WASH @ PUR· PUR -3 · O/U 50.5scores off 12 / 2
Washington
Proj26
Final38
Purdue
Proj28
Final26
Line PUR -2.5 → PUR -3 (0.5 toward PUR, didn’t cover)·Total 51.5 → 50.5 ▼1
WASH W O64 vs 50.5 Model PUR ✗ Upset
APP @ CCU· APP -1.5 · O/U 48.5scores off 8 / 7
App State
Proj27
Final35
Coastal Carolina
Proj25
Final32
Total 51.5 → 48.5 ▼3
APP W O67 vs 48.5 Model APP ✓
OSU @ IU· OSU -3 · O/U 49.5scores off 9 / 10
Ohio State
Proj28
Final19
Indiana
Proj25
Final15
Line Pick’em → OSU -3 (3 toward OSU, covered)·Total 48.5 → 49.5 ▲1
OSU W U34 vs 49.5 Model OSU ✓
FLA @ TEX· TEX -13.5 · O/U 51.5scores off 7 / 10
Florida
Proj20
Final27
Texas
Proj34
Final24
Line TEX -9.5 → TEX -13.5 (4 toward TEX, didn’t cover)·Total 53.5 → 51.5 ▼2
FLA W U51 vs 51.5 Model TEX ✗ Upset
MSST @ LSU· LSU -17.5 · O/U 56.5scores off 20 / 6
Mississippi State
Proj20
Final0
LSU
Proj37
Final31
Line LSU -12.5 → LSU -17.5 (5 toward LSU, covered)·Total 59.5 → 56.5 ▼3
LSU W U31 vs 56.5 Model LSU ✓
UVA @ SMU· SMU -10 · O/U 51.5scores off 8 / 8
Virginia
Proj21
Final13
SMU
Proj31
Final23
Line SMU -7.5 → SMU -10 (2.5 toward SMU)·Total 53.5 → 51.5 ▼2
P U36 vs 51.5 Model SMU ✓
NU @ MSU· NU -7.5 · O/U 50.5scores off 4 / 0
Northwestern
Proj28
Final24
Michigan State
Proj21
Final21
Line NU -8.5 → NU -7.5 (1 toward MSU, covered)·Total 47.5 → 50.5 ▲3
MSU W U45 vs 50.5 Model NU ✓
CIN @ WVU· WVU -1.5 · O/U 64.5scores off 13 / 15
Cincinnati
Proj29
Final42
West Virginia
Proj30
Final45
Total 61.5 → 64.5 ▲3
WVU W O87 vs 64.5 Model WVU ✓
KU @ KSU· KSU -3 · O/U 55.5scores off 2 / 6
Kansas
Proj26
Final24
Kansas State
Proj29
Final35
Line KSU -8.5 → KSU -3 (5.5 toward KU, didn’t cover)·Total 54.5 → 55.5 ▲1
KSU W O59 vs 55.5 Model KSU ✓
PITT @ BC· PITT -6.5 · O/U 42.5scores off 4 / 10
Pittsburgh
Proj25
Final21
Boston College
Proj17
Final27
Line PITT -7 → PITT -6.5 (0.5 toward BC, covered)·Total 46.5 → 42.5 ▼4
BC W O48 vs 42.5 Model PITT ✗ Upset
FAU @ ARMY· ARMY -2.5 · O/U 55.5scores off 3 / 26
Florida Atlantic
Proj27
Final24
Army
Proj30
Final56
Line ARMY -3 → ARMY -2.5 (0.5 toward FAU, didn’t cover)·Total 59.5 → 55.5 ▼4
ARMY W O80 vs 55.5 Model ARMY ✓
BALL @ BGSU· BGSU -6 · O/U 46.5scores off 11 / 3
Ball State
Proj21
Final32
Bowling Green
Proj28
Final31
Line BGSU -8.5 → BGSU -6 (2.5 toward BALL, covered)·Total 44.5 → 46.5 ▲2
BALL W O63 vs 46.5 Model BGSU ✗ Upset
GAST @ JMU· JMU -7.5 · O/U 57.5scores off 1 / 18
Georgia State
Proj23
Final22
James Madison
Proj31
Final49
Line JMU -12.5 → JMU -7.5 (5 toward GAST, didn’t cover)·Total 54.5 → 57.5 ▲3
JMU W O71 vs 57.5 Model JMU ✓
RUTG @ MD· MD -5.5 · O/U 55.5scores off 13 / 0
Rutgers
Proj24
Final37
Maryland
Proj30
Final30
Line MD -4.5 → MD -5.5 (1 toward MD, didn’t cover)·Total 58.5 → 55.5 ▼3
RUTG W O67 vs 55.5 Model MD ✗ Upset
CLT @ TEM· TEM -17.5 · O/U 47.5scores off 23 / 2
Charlotte
Proj15
Final38
Temple
Proj33
Final31
Line TEM -23.5 → TEM -17.5 (6 toward CLT, covered)·Total 49.5 → 47.5 ▼2
CLT W O69 vs 47.5 Model TEM ✗ Upset
MASS @ BUFF· BUFF -6.5 · O/U 43.5scores off 3 / 1
Massachusetts
Proj21
Final18
Buffalo
Proj26
Final25
Line BUFF -4.5 → BUFF -6.5 (2 toward BUFF, covered)·Total 47.5 → 43.5 ▼4
BUFF W U43 vs 43.5 Model BUFF ✓
WMU @ CMU· WMU -7.5 · O/U 42.5scores off 4 / 3
Western Michigan
Proj25
Final21
Central Michigan
Proj17
Final14
Line WMU -7 → WMU -7.5 (0.5 toward WMU, didn’t cover)
CMU W U35 vs 42.5 Model WMU ✓
AUB @ UGA· UGA -19.5 · O/U 50.5scores off 13 / 10
Auburn
Proj14
Final27
Georgia
Proj34
Final24
Line UGA -16.5 → UGA -19.5 (3 toward UGA, didn’t cover)·Total 55.5 → 50.5 ▼5
AUB W O51 vs 50.5 Model UGA ✗ Upset
ALA @ TENN· ALA -7.5 · O/U 50.5scores off 20 / 3
Alabama
Proj30
Final10
Tennessee
Proj23
Final26
Line ALA -1.5 → ALA -7.5 (6 toward ALA, didn’t cover)·Total 56.5 → 50.5 ▼6
TENN W U36 vs 50.5 Model ALA ✗ Upset
MIZ @ MISS· MISS -4 · O/U 57.5scores off 21 / 3
Missouri
Proj24
Final3
Ole Miss
Proj28
Final31
Line MISS -6 → MISS -4 (2 toward MIZ, didn’t cover)
MISS W U34 vs 57.5 Model MISS ✓
ASU @ TTU· TTU -16.5 · O/U 50.5scores off 8 / 19
Arizona State
Proj17
Final25
Texas Tech
Proj34
Final53
Line TTU -12.5 → TTU -16.5 (4 toward TTU, covered)·Total 52.5 → 50.5 ▼2
TTU W O78 vs 50.5 Model TTU ✓
GT @ VT· VT -8.5 · O/U 55.5scores off 2 / 3
Georgia Tech
Proj22
Final24
Virginia Tech
Proj31
Final34
Line VT -10 → VT -8.5 (1.5 toward GT, didn’t cover)
VT W O58 vs 55.5 Model VT ✓
UNC @ DUKE· DUKE -3 · O/U 46.5scores off 4 / 4
North Carolina
Proj20
Final24
Duke
Proj24
Final20
Line DUKE -4.5 → DUKE -3 (1.5 toward UNC, covered)·Total 54.5 → 46.5 ▼8
UNC W U44 vs 46.5 Model DUKE ✗ Upset
PSU @ MICH· MICH -6 · O/U 43.5scores off 2 / 4
Penn State
Proj20
Final18
Michigan
Proj25
Final21
Line MICH -6.5 → MICH -6 (0.5 toward PSU, covered)·Total 51.5 → 43.5 ▼8
PSU W U39 vs 43.5 Model MICH ✓
NIU @ WYO· WYO -7 · O/U 42.5scores off 7 / 17
Northern Illinois
Proj16
Final23
Wyoming
Proj24
Final41
Line WYO -7.5 → WYO -7 (0.5 toward NIU, didn’t cover)·Total 38.5 → 42.5 ▲4
WYO W O64 vs 42.5 Model WYO ✓
UNLV @ AFA· AFA -1.5 · O/U 49.5scores off 8 / 16
UNLV
Proj23
Final31
Air Force
Proj25
Final41
Line UNLV -3 → AFA -1.5 (4.5 toward AFA, covered)·Total 48.5 → 49.5 ▲1
AFA W O72 vs 49.5 Model AFA ✓
TOL @ EMU· TOL -7.5 · O/U 51.5scores off 3 / 9
Toledo
Proj31
Final34
Eastern Michigan
Proj23
Final14
Line TOL -6.5 → TOL -7.5 (1 toward TOL, covered)·Total 52.5 → 51.5 ▼1
TOL W U48 vs 51.5 Model TOL ✓
AKR @ M-OH· M-OH -9.5 · O/U 47.5scores off 7 / 3
Akron
Proj21
Final14
Miami (OH)
Proj31
Final34
Total 46.5 → 47.5 ▲1
M-OH W O48 vs 47.5 Model M-OH ✓
TLSA @ RICE· TLSA -3.5 · O/U 47.5scores off 13 / 4
Tulsa
Proj25
Final38
Rice
Proj21
Final17
Line TLSA -2.5 → TLSA -3.5 (1 toward TLSA, covered)·Total 46.5 → 47.5 ▲1
TLSA W O55 vs 47.5 Model TLSA ✓
TROY @ UL· UL -3 · O/U 49.5scores off 16 / 8
Troy
Proj22
Final6
Louisiana
Proj25
Final33
Line UL -3.5 → UL -3 (0.5 toward TROY, didn’t cover)·Total 47.5 → 49.5 ▲2
UL W U39 vs 49.5 Model UL ✓
WSU @ ORST· ORST -18.5 · O/U 52.5scores off 15 / 15
Washington State
Proj15
Final30
Oregon State
Proj33
Final48
Line ORST -17.5 → ORST -18.5 (1 toward ORST, didn’t cover)
WSU W O78 vs 52.5 Model ORST ✓
FSU @ MIA· MIA -20.5 · O/U 57.5scores off 16 / 4
Florida State
Proj19
Final35
Miami
Proj39
Final43
Line MIA -16.5 → MIA -20.5 (4 toward MIA, didn’t cover)·Total 53.5 → 57.5 ▲4
FSU W O78 vs 57.5 Model MIA ✓
ARK @ VAN· VAN -5.5 · O/U 48.5scores off 8 / 7
Arkansas
Proj23
Final31
Vanderbilt
Proj28
Final21
Line VAN -6.5 → VAN -5.5 (1 toward ARK, covered)·Total 50.5 → 48.5 ▼2
ARK W O52 vs 48.5 Model VAN ✗ Upset
TCU @ BAY· BAY -3.5 · O/U 50.5scores off 6 / 21
TCU
Proj23
Final17
Baylor
Proj27
Final6
Line BAY -6.5 → BAY -3.5 (3 toward TCU, covered)·Total 51.5 → 50.5 ▼1
TCU W U23 vs 50.5 Model BAY ✗ Upset
KENT @ USF· USF -20.5 · O/U 46.5scores off 11 / 4
Kent State
Proj13
Final2
South Florida
Proj33
Final29
Line USF -18.5 → USF -20.5 (2 toward USF, covered)·Total 49.5 → 46.5 ▼3
USF W U31 vs 46.5 Model USF ✓
NEV @ NDSU· NDSU -14.5 · O/U 42.5scores off 1 / 0
Nevada
Proj16
Final17
North Dakota State
Proj31
Final31
Total 46.5 → 42.5 ▼4
NEV W O48 vs 42.5 Model NDSU ✓
ARST @ USM· ARST -5.5 · O/U 61.5scores off 8 / 13
Arkansas State
Proj31
Final23
Southern Miss
Proj26
Final13
Line ARST -6.5 → ARST -5.5 (1 toward USM, didn’t cover)·Total 55.5 → 61.5 ▲6
ARST W U36 vs 61.5 Model ARST ✓
ND @ BYU· ND -10.5 · O/U 47.5scores off 6 / 8
Notre Dame
Proj30
Final24
BYU
Proj20
Final28
Line ND -11.5 → ND -10.5 (1 toward BYU, covered)·Total 54.5 → 47.5 ▼7
BYU W O52 vs 47.5 Model ND ✗ Upset
WIS @ UCLA· UCLA -1.5 · O/U 42.5scores off 15 / 8
Wisconsin
Proj22
Final7
UCLA
Proj25
Final17
Line UCLA -3 → UCLA -1.5 (1.5 toward WIS, didn’t cover)·Total 49.5 → 42.5 ▼7
UCLA W U24 vs 42.5 Model UCLA ✓
UK @ OU· OU -7 · O/U 44.5scores off 2 / 13
Kentucky
Proj19
Final21
Oklahoma
Proj26
Final13
Line OU -6.5 → OU -7 (0.5 toward OU, didn’t cover)·Total 41.5 → 44.5 ▲3
UK W U34 vs 44.5 Model OU ✗ Upset
OKST @ HOU· HOU -4 · O/U 62.5scores off 6 / 3
Oklahoma State
Proj26
Final32
Houston
Proj32
Final35
Line HOU -3.5 → HOU -4 (0.5 toward HOU, didn’t cover)·Total 57.5 → 62.5 ▲5
OKST W O67 vs 62.5 Model HOU ✓
LOU @ SYR· LOU -14.5 · O/U 56.5scores off 1 / 4
Louisville
Proj35
Final34
Syracuse
Proj22
Final26
Line LOU -10.5 → LOU -14.5 (4 toward LOU, didn’t cover)·Total 55.5 → 56.5 ▲1
SYR W O60 vs 56.5 Model LOU ✓
NAVY @ UTSA· UTSA -5.5 · O/U 52.5scores off 11 / 8
Navy
Proj23
Final34
UTSA
Proj30
Final38
Line UTSA -7 → UTSA -5.5 (1.5 toward NAVY, covered)·Total 55.5 → 52.5 ▼3
NAVY W O72 vs 52.5 Model UTSA ✓
LT @ ULM· LT -13.5 · O/U 55.5scores off 10 / 20
Louisiana Tech
Proj34
Final24
UL Monroe
Proj20
Final0
Line LT -14.5 → LT -13.5 (1 toward ULM, didn’t cover)·Total 52.5 → 55.5 ▲3
LT W U24 vs 55.5 Model LT ✓
SJSU @ UTEP· SJSU -6.5 · O/U 46.5scores off 5 / 11
San José State
Proj29
Final24
UTEP
Proj22
Final11
Line SJSU -10 → SJSU -6.5 (3.5 toward UTEP, didn’t cover)·Total 52.5 → 46.5 ▼6
SJSU W U35 vs 46.5 Model SJSU ✓
OHIO @ SAC· OHIO -17.5 · O/U 46.5scores off 15 / 10
Ohio
Proj33
Final48
Sacramento State
Proj17
Final7
Line OHIO -13.5 → OHIO -17.5 (4 toward OHIO, covered)·Total 49.5 → 46.5 ▼3
OHIO W O55 vs 46.5 Model OHIO ✓
UTAH @ COLO· UTAH -15.5 · O/U 49.5scores off 6 / 7
Utah
Proj33
Final27
Colorado
Proj17
Final24
Line UTAH -16.5 → UTAH -15.5 (1 toward COLO, covered)
COLO W O51 vs 49.5 Model UTAH ✓
WAKE @ CAL· WAKE -10 · O/U 54.5scores off 9 / 15
Wake Forest
Proj32
Final41
California
Proj22
Final7
Line WAKE -8.5 → WAKE -10 (1.5 toward WAKE, covered)·Total 53.5 → 54.5 ▲1
WAKE W U48 vs 54.5 Model WAKE ✓
FRES @ SDSU· FRES -6.5 · O/U 46.5scores off 3 / 7
Fresno State
Proj26
Final23
San Diego State
Proj19
Final26
Line FRES -8.5 → FRES -6.5 (2 toward SDSU, covered)·Total 43.5 → 46.5 ▲3
SDSU W O49 vs 46.5 Model FRES ✗ Upset
UNM @ HAW· UNM -14.5 · O/U 46.5scores off 10 / 7
New Mexico
Proj31
Final21
Hawai'i
Proj17
Final10
Line UNM -15.5 → UNM -14.5 (1 toward HAW, covered)·Total 48.5 → 46.5 ▼2
HAW W U31 vs 46.5 Model UNM ✓
NEB @ ORE· ORE -6.5 · O/U 50.5scores off 10 / 14
Nebraska
Proj24
Final14
Oregon
Proj31
Final17
Line ORE -21.5 → ORE -6.5 (15 toward NEB, covered)·Total 51.5 → 50.5 ▼1
NEB W U31 vs 50.5 Model ORE ✓
Projections are the model's walk-forward numbers: each game uses ratings from before its week, the same figures shown on the game cards. ATS and totals use the closing line.