Pete Maravich Assembly Center · at LSU
LineNo line yet
Total—
 QUC | This season | LSU |
|---|---|---|
| 1-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 1-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 1-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects LSU 93–76 · win probability LSU 93%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 168.2
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: LSU has more of the edges
QUC 2, LSU 4 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
LSUBigLSU offense vs QUC defense
Offense 37th of 366 against a defense 349th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
QUC has played the 196th-hardest schedule, LSU the 49th. A record against a soft schedule means less
LSUSmallRebounding
Offensive rebound rate: QUC 30.2%, LSU 33.1%. Defensive: QUC 66.4%, LSU 68.3%
LSUSmallFree throws
Free throw rate: QUC 35.4, LSU 40.9. Allowed: QUC 38.1, LSU 37.8
QUCSmallTurnovers
Turnover rate: QUC 14.8%, LSU 15.5%. Forced: QUC 15.1%, LSU 14.0%
LSUSmallHome court
LSU at home. This season: LSU 0-0 at home, QUC 0-0 away
QUCSmallThree-pointers
QUC hits 35.7% and allows 36.5%; LSU hits 33.1% and allows 35.4%. Threes are 46.5% and 34.5% of their shots
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: QUC 56.4 and allows 54.6; LSU 52.8 and allows 50.9
Even
QUC offense vs LSU defense
Offense 101st of 366 against a defense 77th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 71 possessions: QUC plays 71.2 a game (65th fastest), LSU 70.5 (95th). Faster games mean more points
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edge
Spread
Market—
ModelLSU -17.2
Model edge—
Total
Market—
Model168.2
Model edge—
Projected score
QUC 75.5 · LSU 92.7
Win probability
LSU 93%
1st half
Spread
LSU -10.1
Total
78.5
Projected score
QUC 34.2 · LSU 44.3
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| QUC | 7-3 70% | 4-6 40% | 8-2 80% |
| LSU | 1-9 10% | 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Queens University Royals
34 games played
Straight up
20-14
59% wins
Against the spread
15-19
44% covers · avg +0.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
22-12
65% overs · avg +6.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs WIN | L 74-81 | +3.5 | L −3.5 | 163.5 | U 155 |
| Nov 8 | @ VILL | L 74-94 | +17.5 | L −2.5 | 150.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 11 | @ DUQ | L 81-87 | +12.5 | W +6.5 | 162.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 15 | vs SHU | W 81-64 | -5.5 | W +11.5 | 165.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 20 | vs UNCG | W 101-94 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 150.5 | O 195 |
| Nov 23 | @ FUR | L 79-90 | +8.5 | L −2.5 | 153.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 28 | @ UVA | L 69-94 | +25.5 | W +0.5 | 160.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 3 | vs GWEB | W 107-74 | -14.5 | W +18.5 | 161.5 | O 181 |
| Dec 12 | vs SCST | W 102-78 | -18.5 | W +5.5 | 157.5 | O 180 |
| Dec 14 | @ WAKE | L 73-111 | +18.5 | L −19.5 | 165.5 | O 184 |
| Dec 16 | @ ARK | L 80-108 | +23.5 | L −4.5 | 169.5 | O 188 |
| Dec 29 | @ AUB | L 65-106 | +25.5 | L −15.5 | 171.5 | U 171 |
| Jan 1 | vs EKU | W 91-89 | -4.5 | L −2.5 | 164.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 3 | vs BELL | W 98-76 | -7.5 | W +14.5 | 169.5 | O 174 |
| Jan 8 | @ JAX | W 77-51 | -4.5 | W +21.5 | 154.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 10 | @ UNF | W 89-82 | -11.5 | L −4.5 | 173.5 | U 171 |
| Jan 15 | @ FGCU | W 85-74 | +1.5 | W +12.5 | 166.5 | U 159 |
| Jan 17 | @ STET | W 87-81 | -10.5 | L −4.5 | 162.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 21 | vs UNA | W 87-62 | -12.5 | W +12.5 | 162.5 | U 149 |
| Jan 24 | @ WGA | L 66-74 | -7.5 | L −15.5 | 162.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 28 | vs CARK | L 90-100 | -5.5 | L −15.5 | 158.5 | O 190 |
| Jan 31 | @BELL | L 75-78 | -5.5 | L −8.5 | 163.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 5 | vsJAX | W 93-84 | -8.5 | W +0.5 | 146.5 | O 177 |
| Feb 7 | vsUNF | W 91-72 | -15.5 | W +3.5 | 178.5 | U 163 |
| Feb 11 | vs APSU | L 87-95 | -2.5 | L −10.5 | 161.5 | O 182 |
| Feb 14 | vs LIP | W 87-81 | -3.5 | W +2.5 | 165.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 18 | @UNA | W 85-78 | -8.5 | L −1.5 | 156.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 21 | vsWGA | W 91-84 | -11.5 | L −4.5 | 161.5 | O 175 |
| Feb 25 | @EKU | W 96-79 | -2.5 | W +14.5 | 165.5 | O 175 |
| Feb 28 | @CARK | L 79-84 | +2.5 | L −2.5 | 163.5 | U 163 |
| Mar 6 | vsWGA | W 71-63 | -8.5 | L −0.5 | 164.5 | U 134 |
| Mar 7 | vsAPSU | W 90-83 | +2.5 | W +9.5 | 161.5 | O 173 |
| Mar 8 | vsCARK | W 98-93 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 157.5 | O 191 |
| Mar 20 | vs PUR | L 71-104 | +25.5 | L −7.5 | 159.5 | O 175 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vsWIN
WINL 74-81
−3.5
8
@VILL
VILLL 74-94
−2.5
11
@DUQ
DUQL 81-87
+6.5
15
vsSHU
SHUW 81-64
+11.5
20
vsUNCG
UNCGW 101-94
−0.5
23
@FUR
FURL 79-90
−2.5
28
@UVA
UVAL 69-94
+0.5
3
vsGWEB
GWEBW 107-74
+18.5
12
vsSCST
SCSTW 102-78
+5.5
14
@WAKE
WAKEL 73-111
−19.5
16
@ARK
ARKL 80-108
−4.5
29
@AUB
AUBL 65-106
−15.5
1
vsEKU
EKUW 91-89
−2.5
3
vsBELL
BELLW 98-76
+14.5
8
@JAX
JAXW 77-51
+21.5
10
@UNF
UNFW 89-82
−4.5
15
@FGCU
FGCUW 85-74
+12.5
17
@STET
STETW 87-81
−4.5
21
vsUNA
UNAW 87-62
+12.5
24
@WGA
WGAL 66-74
−15.5
28
vsCARK
CARKL 90-100
−15.5
31
@BELL
BELLL 75-78
−8.5
5
vsJAX
JAXW 93-84
+0.5
7
vsUNF
UNFW 91-72
+3.5
11
vsAPSU
APSUL 87-95
−10.5
14
vsLIP
LIPW 87-81
+2.5
18
@UNA
UNAW 85-78
−1.5
21
vsWGA
WGAW 91-84
−4.5
25
@EKU
EKUW 96-79
+14.5
28
@CARK
CARKL 79-84
−2.5
6
vsWGA
WGAW 71-63
−0.5
7
vsAPSU
APSUW 90-83
+9.5
8
vsCARK
CARKW 98-93
+6.5
20
vsPUR
PURL 71-104
−7.5
covered 15didn’t cover 19avg +0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vsWIN
WINL 74-81
−8.5
8
@VILL
VILLL 74-94
+17.5
11
@DUQ
DUQL 81-87
+5.5
15
vsSHU
SHUW 81-64
−20.5
20
vsUNCG
UNCGW 101-94
+44.5
23
@FUR
FURL 79-90
+15.5
28
@UVA
UVAL 69-94
+2.5
3
vsGWEB
GWEBW 107-74
+19.5
12
vsSCST
SCSTW 102-78
+22.5
14
@WAKE
WAKEL 73-111
+18.5
16
@ARK
ARKL 80-108
+18.5
29
@AUB
AUBL 65-106
−0.5
1
vsEKU
EKUW 91-89
+15.5
3
vsBELL
BELLW 98-76
+4.5
8
@JAX
JAXW 77-51
−26.5
10
@UNF
UNFW 89-82
−2.5
15
@FGCU
FGCUW 85-74
−7.5
17
@STET
STETW 87-81
+5.5
21
vsUNA
UNAW 87-62
−13.5
24
@WGA
WGAL 66-74
−22.5
28
vsCARK
CARKL 90-100
+31.5
31
@BELL
BELLL 75-78
−10.5
5
vsJAX
JAXW 93-84
+30.5
7
vsUNF
UNFW 91-72
−15.5
11
vsAPSU
APSUL 87-95
+20.5
14
vsLIP
LIPW 87-81
+2.5
18
@UNA
UNAW 85-78
+6.5
21
vsWGA
WGAW 91-84
+13.5
25
@EKU
EKUW 96-79
+9.5
28
@CARK
CARKL 79-84
−0.5
6
vsWGA
WGAW 71-63
−30.5
7
vsAPSU
APSUW 90-83
+11.5
8
vsCARK
CARKW 98-93
+33.5
20
vsPUR
PURL 71-104
+15.5
over 22under 12avg +6.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
LSU
32 games played
Straight up
15-17
47% wins
Against the spread
18-14
56% covers · avg −0.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-16
50% overs · avg +4.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5 | vs TAR | W 96-60 | -15.5 | W +20.5 | 148.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 10 | vs NOLA | W 93-58 | -19.5 | W +15.5 | 162.5 | U 151 |
| Nov 13 | vs FIU | W 98-81 | -21.5 | L −4.5 | 158.5 | O 179 |
| Nov 18 | vs ALCN | W 107-81 | -32.5 | L −6.5 | 155.5 | O 188 |
| Nov 21 | vs OMA | W 99-73 | -20.5 | W +5.5 | 163.5 | O 172 |
| Nov 28 | vs DRKE | W 71-62 | -11.5 | L −2.5 | 151.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 29 | vs DEP | W 96-63 | -5.5 | W +27.5 | 152.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 3 | @ BC | W 78-69 | -7.5 | W +1.5 | 149.5 | U 147 |
| Dec 7 | vs TTU | L 58-82 | +5.5 | L −18.5 | 154.5 | U 140 |
| Dec 13 | vs SMU | W 89-77 | -1.5 | W +10.5 | 158.5 | O 166 |
| Dec 19 | vs SELA | W 78-65 | -24.5 | L −11.5 | 144.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 22 | vs PV | W 104-90 | -29.5 | L −15.5 | 161.5 | O 194 |
| Dec 29 | vs USM | W 90-62 | -21.5 | W +6.5 | 154.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 3 | @ TA&M | L 72-75 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 168.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 6 | vs SC | L 68-78 | -7.5 | L −17.5 | 145.5 | O 146 |
| Jan 10 | @ VAN | L 73-84 | +13.5 | W +2.5 | 159.5 | U 157 |
| Jan 14 | vs UK | L 74-75 | +3.5 | W +2.5 | 151.5 | U 149 |
| Jan 17 | vs MIZ | W 78-70 | -1.5 | W +6.5 | 148.5 | U 148 |
| Jan 20 | @ FLA | L 61-79 | +15.5 | L −2.5 | 158.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 24 | @ARK | L 81-85 | +10.5 | W +6.5 | 163.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 28 | vs MSST | L 66-80 | -7.5 | L −21.5 | 154.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 31 | @SC | W 92-87 | -2.5 | W +2.5 | 147.5 | O 179 |
| Feb 7 | vs UGA | L 71-83 | +1.5 | L −10.5 | 161.5 | U 154 |
| Feb 10 | vsARK | L 62-91 | +4.5 | L −24.5 | 159.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 14 | @ TENN | L 63-73 | +14.5 | W +4.5 | 143.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 17 | @ TEX | L 85-88 | +10.5 | W +7.5 | 150.5 | O 173 |
| Feb 21 | vs ALA | L 83-90 | +7.5 | W +0.5 | 172.5 | O 173 |
| Feb 25 | @ MISS | W 106-99 | +2.5 | W +9.5 | 147.5 | O 205 |
| Feb 28 | vs OU | L 67-83 | -1.5 | L −17.5 | 155.5 | U 150 |
| Mar 3 | @AUB | L 74-88 | +10.5 | L −3.5 | 155.5 | O 162 |
| Mar 7 | vsTA&M | L 91-94 | +2.5 | L −0.5 | 161.5 | O 185 |
| Mar 11 | vsUK | L 82-87 | +8.5 | W +3.5 | 151.5 | O 169 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
5
vsTAR
TARW 96-60
+20.5
10
vsNOLA
NOLAW 93-58
+15.5
13
vsFIU
FIUW 98-81
−4.5
18
vsALCN
ALCNW 107-81
−6.5
21
vsOMA
OMAW 99-73
+5.5
28
vsDRKE
DRKEW 71-62
−2.5
29
vsDEP
DEPW 96-63
+27.5
3
@BC
BCW 78-69
+1.5
7
vsTTU
TTUL 58-82
−18.5
13
vsSMU
SMUW 89-77
+10.5
19
vsSELA
SELAW 78-65
−11.5
22
vsPV
PVW 104-90
−15.5
29
vsUSM
USMW 90-62
+6.5
3
@TA&M
TA&ML 72-75
+2.5
6
vsSC
SCL 68-78
−17.5
10
@VAN
VANL 73-84
+2.5
14
vsUK
UKL 74-75
+2.5
17
vsMIZ
MIZW 78-70
+6.5
20
@FLA
FLAL 61-79
−2.5
24
@ARK
ARKL 81-85
+6.5
28
vsMSST
MSSTL 66-80
−21.5
31
@SC
SCW 92-87
+2.5
7
vsUGA
UGAL 71-83
−10.5
10
vsARK
ARKL 62-91
−24.5
14
@TENN
TENNL 63-73
+4.5
17
@TEX
TEXL 85-88
+7.5
21
vsALA
ALAL 83-90
+0.5
25
@MISS
MISSW 106-99
+9.5
28
vsOU
OUL 67-83
−17.5
3
@AUB
AUBL 74-88
−3.5
7
vsTA&M
TA&ML 91-94
−0.5
11
vsUK
UKL 82-87
+3.5
covered 18didn’t cover 14avg −0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
5
vsTAR
TARW 96-60
+7.5
10
vsNOLA
NOLAW 93-58
−11.5
13
vsFIU
FIUW 98-81
+20.5
18
vsALCN
ALCNW 107-81
+32.5
21
vsOMA
OMAW 99-73
+8.5
28
vsDRKE
DRKEW 71-62
−18.5
29
vsDEP
DEPW 96-63
+6.5
3
@BC
BCW 78-69
−2.5
7
vsTTU
TTUL 58-82
−14.5
13
vsSMU
SMUW 89-77
+7.5
19
vsSELA
SELAW 78-65
−1.5
22
vsPV
PVW 104-90
+32.5
29
vsUSM
USMW 90-62
−2.5
3
@TA&M
TA&ML 72-75
−21.5
6
vsSC
SCL 68-78
+0.5
10
@VAN
VANL 73-84
−2.5
14
vsUK
UKL 74-75
−2.5
17
vsMIZ
MIZW 78-70
−0.5
20
@FLA
FLAL 61-79
−18.5
24
@ARK
ARKL 81-85
+2.5
28
vsMSST
MSSTL 66-80
−8.5
31
@SC
SCW 92-87
+31.5
7
vsUGA
UGAL 71-83
−7.5
10
vsARK
ARKL 62-91
−6.5
14
@TENN
TENNL 63-73
−7.5
17
@TEX
TEXL 85-88
+22.5
21
vsALA
ALAL 83-90
+0.5
25
@MISS
MISSW 106-99
+57.5
28
vsOU
OUL 67-83
−5.5
3
@AUB
AUBL 74-88
+6.5
7
vsTA&M
TA&ML 91-94
+23.5
11
vsUK
UKL 82-87
+17.5
over 16under 16avg +4.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
QUC84.4 #16LSU81.4 #41Points per possession
QUC1.19 #25LSU1.15 #60Pace (possessions)
QUC71.2 #65LSU70.5 #95Shooting
Effective FG%
QUC56.4 #15LSU52.8 #1113-point %
QUC35.7 #74LSU33.1 #2253-point attempt rate
QUC46.5 #38LSU34.5 #286Free throw rate
QUC35.4 #167LSU40.9 #49Possessions
Turnover rate
QUC14.8 #54LSU15.5 #106Offensive rebound rate
QUC30.2 #190LSU33.1 #87Assists per game
QUC16.0 #49LSU14.7 #106Defense
Points allowed
QUC83.8 #355LSU78.5 #279Points allowed per possession
QUC1.17 #346LSU1.12 #270Opponent effective FG%
QUC54.6 #319LSU50.9 #150Opponent 3-point %
QUC36.5 #325LSU35.4 #271Turnovers forced
QUC15.1 #276LSU14.0 #335Defensive rebound rate
QUC66.4 #308LSU68.3 #239Steals per game
QUC6.0 #238LSU6.0 #240Blocks per game
QUC2.9 #236LSU3.9 #87| QUC | LSU | |
|---|---|---|
| Scoring | ||
| 84.4 #16 | Points per game | 81.4 #41 |
| 1.19 #25 | Points per possession | 1.15 #60 |
| 71.2 #65 | Pace (possessions) | 70.5 #95 |
| Shooting | ||
| 56.4 #15 | Effective FG% | 52.8 #111 |
| 35.7 #74 | 3-point % | 33.1 #225 |
| 46.5 #38 | 3-point attempt rate | 34.5 #286 |
| 35.4 #167 | Free throw rate | 40.9 #49 |
| Possessions | ||
| 14.8 #54 | Turnover rate | 15.5 #106 |
| 30.2 #190 | Offensive rebound rate | 33.1 #87 |
| 16.0 #49 | Assists per game | 14.7 #106 |
| Defense | ||
| 83.8 #355 | Points allowed | 78.5 #279 |
| 1.17 #346 | Points allowed per possession | 1.12 #270 |
| 54.6 #319 | Opponent effective FG% | 50.9 #150 |
| 36.5 #325 | Opponent 3-point % | 35.4 #271 |
| 15.1 #276 | Turnovers forced | 14.0 #335 |
| 66.4 #308 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.3 #239 |
| 6.0 #238 | Steals per game | 6.0 #240 |
| 2.9 #236 | Blocks per game | 3.9 #87 |
Queens University Royals
20-14 in 2025-26 overall · 16-5 in conference · Atlantic Sun Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Purdue71–104
- Wvs C Arkansas98–93
- Wvs Austin Peay90–83
- Wvs West Georgia71–63
- L@ C Arkansas79–84
A week or more of rest.
LSU
15-17 in 2025-26 overall · 3-16 in conference · Southeastern Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Kentucky82–87
- Lvs Texas A&M91–94
- L@ Auburn74–88
- Lvs Oklahoma67–83
- W@ Ole Miss106–99
A week or more of rest.