Acrisure Arena · Neutral site
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | LSU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects LSU 78–78 · win probability LSU 51%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 156.4
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: LSU has more of the edges
ASU 1, LSU 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: ASU 29.9%, LSU 33.1%. Defensive: ASU 65.1%, LSU 68.3%
Shooting
Effective FG%: ASU 51.1 and allows 52.4; LSU 52.8 and allows 50.9
Turnovers
Turnover rate: ASU 17.1%, LSU 15.5%. Forced: ASU 18.4%, LSU 14.0%
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: ASU 39.5, LSU 40.9. Allowed: ASU 34.3, LSU 37.8
Context
Schedule so far
ASU has played the 13th-hardest schedule, LSU the 49th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
LSU offense vs ASU defense
Offense 37th of 366 against a defense 60th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Three-pointers
ASU hits 33.4% and allows 35.0%; LSU hits 33.1% and allows 35.4%. Threes are 38.4% and 34.5% of their shots
Even
ASU offense vs LSU defense
Offense 55th of 366 against a defense 77th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: ASU 11%, LSU 0%. Transfers in: ASU 6, LSU 6. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Neutral floor
No home court: the model takes it out of the line
Context
Tempo
About 71 possessions: ASU plays 70.6 a game (93rd fastest), LSU 70.5 (95th). Faster games mean more points
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | LSU -0.2 | — |
| Total | — | 156.4 | — |
| Projected score | — | ASU 78.1 · LSU 78.3 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | ASU -0.0 | — |
| 1H total | 73.1 | — |
| 1H projected score | ASU 36.6 · LSU 36.5 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | 3-7 30% | |
| 1-9 10% | 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Arizona St
33 games played
Straight up
17-16
52% wins
Against the spread
20-13
61% covers · avg +0.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-17
48% overs · avg +0.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | W 81-64 | -17.5 | L −0.5 | 151.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 9 | vs | W 81-66 | -12.5 | W +2.5 | 152.5 | U 147 |
| Nov 14 | vs | L 65-77 | +13.5 | W +1.5 | 158.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 17 | vs | W 75-62 | -18.5 | L −5.5 | 145.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 20 | @ | W 83-76 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 143.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 87-86 | +6.5 | W +7.5 | 153.5 | O 173 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 100-94 | -4.5 | W +1.5 | 157.5 | O 194 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 75-88 | +4.5 | L −8.5 | 161.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 86-70 | +5.5 | W +21.5 | 157.5 | U 156 |
| Dec 9 | vs | W 73-48 | -16.5 | W +8.5 | 154.5 | U 121 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 82-79 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 154.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 77-90 | +9.5 | L −3.5 | 142.5 | O 167 |
| Dec 21 | vs | L 75-78 | -12.5 | L −15.5 | 147.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 89-95 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 156.5 | O 184 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 76-104 | +17.5 | L −10.5 | 168.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 87-84 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 169.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 82-89 | +21.5 | W +14.5 | 167.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 18 | @ | L 73-103 | +18.5 | L −11.5 | 142.5 | O 176 |
| Jan 21 | vs | L 63-75 | -1.5 | L −13.5 | 145.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 82-68 | +3.5 | W +17.5 | 146.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 27 | @ | L 76-79 | +6.5 | W +3.5 | 161.5 | U 155 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 74-87 | +14.5 | W +1.5 | 163.5 | U 161 |
| Feb 4 | @ | W 71-63 | +1.5 | W +9.5 | 161.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 70-78 | +3.5 | L −4.5 | 158.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 10 | vs | W 85-76 | -3.5 | W +5.5 | 163.5 | U 161 |
| Feb 17 | vs | W 72-67 | +7.5 | W +12.5 | 156.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 68-73 | +8.5 | W +3.5 | 157.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 24 | @ | L 78-90 | +6.5 | L −5.5 | 149.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 73-60 | -6.5 | W +6.5 | 150.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 70-60 | +5.5 | W +15.5 | 151.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 65-86 | +16.5 | L −4.5 | 148.5 | O 151 |
| Mar 10 | vs | W 83-79 | +5.5 | W +9.5 | 152.5 | O 162 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 42-91 | +13.5 | L −35.5 | 148.5 | U 133 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
SUU
W 81-64
−0.5
9
vs
UTU
W 81-66
+2.5
14
vs
GONZ
L 65-77
+1.5
17
vs
GAST
W 75-62
−5.5
20
@
HAW
W 83-76
+8.5
24
vs
TEX
W 87-86
+7.5
25
vs
WSU
W 100-94
+1.5
26
vs
USC
L 75-88
−8.5
6
vs
OU
W 86-70
+21.5
9
vs
NAU
W 73-48
+8.5
13
vs
SCU
W 82-79
+4.5
17
@
UCLA
L 77-90
−3.5
21
vs
ORST
L 75-78
−15.5
3
vs
COLO
L 89-95
−7.5
7
@
BYU
L 76-104
−10.5
10
vs
KSU
W 87-84
+1.5
14
@
ARIZ
L 82-89
+14.5
18
@
HOU
L 73-103
−11.5
21
vs
WVU
L 63-75
−13.5
24
vs
CIN
W 82-68
+17.5
27
@
UCF
L 76-79
+3.5
31
vs
ARIZ
L 74-87
+1.5
4
@
UTAH
W 71-63
+9.5
7
@
COLO
L 70-78
−4.5
10
vs
OKST
W 85-76
+5.5
17
vs
TTU
W 72-67
+12.5
21
@
BAY
L 68-73
+3.5
24
@
TCU
L 78-90
−5.5
28
vs
UTAH
W 73-60
+6.5
3
vs
KU
W 70-60
+15.5
7
@
ISU
L 65-86
−4.5
10
vs
BAY
W 83-79
+9.5
11
vs
ISU
L 42-91
−35.5
covered 20didn’t cover 13avg +0.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
SUU
W 81-64
−6.5
9
vs
UTU
W 81-66
−5.5
14
vs
GONZ
L 65-77
−16.5
17
vs
GAST
W 75-62
−8.5
20
@
HAW
W 83-76
+15.5
24
vs
TEX
W 87-86
+19.5
25
vs
WSU
W 100-94
+36.5
26
vs
USC
L 75-88
+1.5
6
vs
OU
W 86-70
−1.5
9
vs
NAU
W 73-48
−33.5
13
vs
SCU
W 82-79
+6.5
17
@
UCLA
L 77-90
+24.5
21
vs
ORST
L 75-78
+5.5
3
vs
COLO
L 89-95
+27.5
7
@
BYU
L 76-104
+11.5
10
vs
KSU
W 87-84
+1.5
14
@
ARIZ
L 82-89
+3.5
18
@
HOU
L 73-103
+33.5
21
vs
WVU
L 63-75
−7.5
24
vs
CIN
W 82-68
+3.5
27
@
UCF
L 76-79
−6.5
31
vs
ARIZ
L 74-87
−2.5
4
@
UTAH
W 71-63
−27.5
7
@
COLO
L 70-78
−10.5
10
vs
OKST
W 85-76
−2.5
17
vs
TTU
W 72-67
−17.5
21
@
BAY
L 68-73
−16.5
24
@
TCU
L 78-90
+18.5
28
vs
UTAH
W 73-60
−17.5
3
vs
KU
W 70-60
−21.5
7
@
ISU
L 65-86
+2.5
10
vs
BAY
W 83-79
+9.5
11
vs
ISU
L 42-91
−15.5
over 16under 17avg +0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
LSU
32 games played
Straight up
15-17
47% wins
Against the spread
18-14
56% covers · avg −0.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-16
50% overs · avg +4.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5 | vs | W 96-60 | -15.5 | W +20.5 | 148.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 10 | vs | W 93-58 | -19.5 | W +15.5 | 162.5 | U 151 |
| Nov 13 | vs | W 98-81 | -21.5 | L −4.5 | 158.5 | O 179 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 107-81 | -32.5 | L −6.5 | 155.5 | O 188 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 99-73 | -20.5 | W +5.5 | 163.5 | O 172 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 71-62 | -11.5 | L −2.5 | 151.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 96-63 | -5.5 | W +27.5 | 152.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 3 | @ | W 78-69 | -7.5 | W +1.5 | 149.5 | U 147 |
| Dec 7 | vs | L 58-82 | +5.5 | L −18.5 | 154.5 | U 140 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 89-77 | -1.5 | W +10.5 | 158.5 | O 166 |
| Dec 19 | vs | W 78-65 | -24.5 | L −11.5 | 144.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 104-90 | -29.5 | L −15.5 | 161.5 | O 194 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 90-62 | -21.5 | W +6.5 | 154.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 72-75 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 168.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 6 | vs | L 68-78 | -7.5 | L −17.5 | 145.5 | O 146 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 73-84 | +13.5 | W +2.5 | 159.5 | U 157 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 74-75 | +3.5 | W +2.5 | 151.5 | U 149 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 78-70 | -1.5 | W +6.5 | 148.5 | U 148 |
| Jan 20 | @ | L 61-79 | +15.5 | L −2.5 | 158.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 81-85 | +10.5 | W +6.5 | 163.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 28 | vs | L 66-80 | -7.5 | L −21.5 | 154.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 92-87 | -2.5 | W +2.5 | 147.5 | O 179 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 71-83 | +1.5 | L −10.5 | 161.5 | U 154 |
| Feb 10 | vs | L 62-91 | +4.5 | L −24.5 | 159.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 63-73 | +14.5 | W +4.5 | 143.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 17 | @ | L 85-88 | +10.5 | W +7.5 | 150.5 | O 173 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 83-90 | +7.5 | W +0.5 | 172.5 | O 173 |
| Feb 25 | @ | W 106-99 | +2.5 | W +9.5 | 147.5 | O 205 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 67-83 | -1.5 | L −17.5 | 155.5 | U 150 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 74-88 | +10.5 | L −3.5 | 155.5 | O 162 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 91-94 | +2.5 | L −0.5 | 161.5 | O 185 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 82-87 | +8.5 | W +3.5 | 151.5 | O 169 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
5
vs
TAR
W 96-60
+20.5
10
vs
NOLA
W 93-58
+15.5
13
vs
FIU
W 98-81
−4.5
18
vs
ALCN
W 107-81
−6.5
21
vs
OMA
W 99-73
+5.5
28
vs
DRKE
W 71-62
−2.5
29
vs
DEP
W 96-63
+27.5
3
@
BC
W 78-69
+1.5
7
vs
TTU
L 58-82
−18.5
13
vs
SMU
W 89-77
+10.5
19
vs
SELA
W 78-65
−11.5
22
vs
PV
W 104-90
−15.5
29
vs
USM
W 90-62
+6.5
3
@
TA&M
L 72-75
+2.5
6
vs
SC
L 68-78
−17.5
10
@
VAN
L 73-84
+2.5
14
vs
UK
L 74-75
+2.5
17
vs
MIZ
W 78-70
+6.5
20
@
FLA
L 61-79
−2.5
24
@
ARK
L 81-85
+6.5
28
vs
MSST
L 66-80
−21.5
31
@
SC
W 92-87
+2.5
7
vs
UGA
L 71-83
−10.5
10
vs
ARK
L 62-91
−24.5
14
@
TENN
L 63-73
+4.5
17
@
TEX
L 85-88
+7.5
21
vs
ALA
L 83-90
+0.5
25
@
MISS
W 106-99
+9.5
28
vs
OU
L 67-83
−17.5
3
@
AUB
L 74-88
−3.5
7
vs
TA&M
L 91-94
−0.5
11
vs
UK
L 82-87
+3.5
covered 18didn’t cover 14avg −0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
5
vs
TAR
W 96-60
+7.5
10
vs
NOLA
W 93-58
−11.5
13
vs
FIU
W 98-81
+20.5
18
vs
ALCN
W 107-81
+32.5
21
vs
OMA
W 99-73
+8.5
28
vs
DRKE
W 71-62
−18.5
29
vs
DEP
W 96-63
+6.5
3
@
BC
W 78-69
−2.5
7
vs
TTU
L 58-82
−14.5
13
vs
SMU
W 89-77
+7.5
19
vs
SELA
W 78-65
−1.5
22
vs
PV
W 104-90
+32.5
29
vs
USM
W 90-62
−2.5
3
@
TA&M
L 72-75
−21.5
6
vs
SC
L 68-78
+0.5
10
@
VAN
L 73-84
−2.5
14
vs
UK
L 74-75
−2.5
17
vs
MIZ
W 78-70
−0.5
20
@
FLA
L 61-79
−18.5
24
@
ARK
L 81-85
+2.5
28
vs
MSST
L 66-80
−8.5
31
@
SC
W 92-87
+31.5
7
vs
UGA
L 71-83
−7.5
10
vs
ARK
L 62-91
−6.5
14
@
TENN
L 63-73
−7.5
17
@
TEX
L 85-88
+22.5
21
vs
ALA
L 83-90
+0.5
25
@
MISS
W 106-99
+57.5
28
vs
OU
L 67-83
−5.5
3
@
AUB
L 74-88
+6.5
7
vs
TA&M
L 91-94
+23.5
11
vs
UK
L 82-87
+17.5
over 16under 16avg +4.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
LSU has the better starters
Position by position: Arizona St 1, LSU 2, even 2
Arizona StBetterLSU
G J. Foxwell TR15.8 pts · 4.3 reb · 6.4 ast
Score 79
→LSUSmall
G D. Dent TR13.3 pts · 2.9 reb · 7.6 ast
Score 95
G D. Shaw TR7.5 pts · 5.3 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 55
←ASUBig
G A. Nunez TR9.6 pts · 2.1 reb · 2.6 ast
Score 17
G E. Innocenti TR6 pts · 3.8 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 58
→LSUSmall
G S. Clark TR11.5 pts · 2.3 reb · 2 ast
Score 87
F P. Murauskas TR18.4 pts · 7.8 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 97
=Even
G A. Bashir TR13.2 pts · 2.2 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 92
C B. Defty TR15.1 pts · 6.8 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 84
=Even
F M. Dioubate TR8.8 pts · 5.5 reb · 1 ast
Score 94
Arizona StBetterLSU
ASU offense55th of 366 · +3.2
=Even
LSU defense77th of 366 · +0.5
ASU defense60th of 366 · +1.2
=Even
LSU offense37th of 366 · +5.0
Backcourt+1.0 · 3 players
→LSUBig
Backcourt+5.8 · 4 players
Frontcourt+9.4 · 2 players
←ASUBig
Frontcourt+3.1 · 1 player
Bench-0.9 · 2 players
→LSUSmall
Bench+0.4 · 1 player
Score, worst to bestASU betterLSU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Foxwell36 min · TRD. Shaw28 min · TRE. Innocenti24 min · TRB. Ford22 minV. WallaceNewJ. CroyNew
Forwards
P. Murauskas33 min · TRA. NyuonNewM. VaughnsNew
Centers
B. Defty29 min · TRN. Garcia7 min · TRF. MalesevicNew
Guards
D. Dent34 min · TRA. Nunez29 min · TRS. Clark29 min · TRA. Bashir25 min · TRD. Ugochukwu16 min · TRL. StansburyNew
Forwards
M. Dioubate22 min · TRS. NiangNewJ. BenderNew
Centers
B. DessertNewG. LevyNewS. PearsonNewM. RuzicNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 76.3 #133 | Points per game | 81.4 #41 |
| 1.08 #178 | Points per possession | 1.15 #60 |
| 70.6 #93 | Pace (possessions) | 70.5 #95 |
| Shooting | ||
| 51.1 #190 | Effective FG% | 52.8 #111 |
| 33.4 #202 | 3-point % | 33.1 #225 |
| 38.4 #201 | 3-point attempt rate | 34.5 #286 |
| 39.5 #66 | Free throw rate | 40.9 #49 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.1 #211 | Turnover rate | 15.5 #106 |
| 29.9 #206 | Offensive rebound rate | 33.1 #87 |
| 13.7 #166 | Assists per game | 14.7 #106 |
| Defense | ||
| 78.3 #273 | Points allowed | 78.5 #279 |
| 1.11 #239 | Points allowed per possession | 1.12 #270 |
| 52.4 #235 | Opponent effective FG% | 50.9 #150 |
| 35.0 #249 | Opponent 3-point % | 35.4 #271 |
| 18.4 #77 | Turnovers forced | 14.0 #335 |
| 65.1 #337 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.3 #239 |
| 7.0 #122 | Steals per game | 6.0 #240 |
| 4.6 #32 | Blocks per game | 3.9 #87 |
Arizona St
17-16 in 2025-26 overall · 8-12 in conference · Big 12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Iowa State42–91
- Wvs Baylor83–79
- L@ Iowa State65–86
- Wvs Kansas70–60
- Wvs Utah73–60
A week or more of rest.
LSU
15-17 in 2025-26 overall · 3-16 in conference · Southeastern Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Kentucky82–87
- Lvs Texas A&M91–94
- L@ Auburn74–88
- Lvs Oklahoma67–83
- W@ Ole Miss106–99
A week or more of rest.