Levien Gymnasium · at Columbia
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | COLU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects COLU 75–67 · win probability COLU 76%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 142.6
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: COLU has more of the edges
SPU 1, COLU 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Turnovers
Turnover rate: SPU 17.7%, COLU 19.3%. Forced: SPU 20.0%, COLU 15.1%
Context
Schedule so far
SPU has played the 335th-hardest schedule, COLU the 169th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: SPU 37.0%, COLU 36.0%. Defensive: SPU 65.3%, COLU 72.8%
SPU offense vs COLU defense
Offense 336th of 366 against a defense 198th, on the model’s ratings
Shooting
Effective FG%: SPU 46.4 and allows 48.1; COLU 53.5 and allows 51.2
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: SPU 32%, COLU 61%. Transfers in: SPU 5, COLU 1. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Home court
COLU at home. This season: COLU 0-0 at home, SPU 0-0 away
Context
Tempo
About 67 possessions: SPU plays 66.1 a game (308th fastest), COLU 67.8 (237th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Three-pointers
SPU hits 31.0% and allows 32.1%; COLU hits 35.9% and allows 35.2%. Threes are 38.8% and 37.5% of their shots
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: SPU 35.5, COLU 28.6. Allowed: SPU 46.4, COLU 33.5
Even
COLU offense vs SPU defense
Offense 163rd of 366 against a defense 182nd, on the model’s ratings
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | COLU -8.0 | — |
| Total | — | 142.6 | — |
| Projected score | — | SPU 67.3 · COLU 75.3 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | COLU -4.6 | — |
| 1H total | 66.7 | — |
| 1H projected score | SPU 31.1 · COLU 35.7 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% | |
| 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Saint Peter's
28 games played
Straight up
16-12
57% wins
Against the spread
17-11
61% covers · avg +0.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
10-18
36% overs · avg −0.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 50-77 | +13.5 | L −13.5 | 129.5 | U 127 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 93-83 | -6.5 | W +3.5 | 137.5 | O 176 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 61-78 | +20.5 | W +3.5 | 147.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 70-81 | +4.5 | L −6.5 | 137.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 68-66 | -8.5 | L −6.5 | 147.5 | U 134 |
| Nov 29 | vs | L 61-87 | -3.5 | L −29.5 | 144.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 5 | vs | W 69-57 | -9.5 | W +2.5 | 129.5 | U 126 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 71-43 | -5.5 | W +22.5 | 131.5 | U 114 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 68-76 | +20.5 | W +12.5 | 140.5 | O 144 |
| Dec 29 | @ | W 70-66 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 140.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 2 | vs | W 69-59 | +2.5 | W +12.5 | 133.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 9 | @ | L 65-70 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 141.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 11 | vs | W 76-63 | -1.5 | W +11.5 | 133.5 | O 139 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 74-70 | +6.5 | W +10.5 | 140.5 | O 144 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 69-58 | -10.5 | W +0.5 | 134.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 19 | vs | W 77-63 | -3.5 | W +10.5 | 141.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 59-67 | +2.5 | L −5.5 | 134.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 30 | vs | W 66-58 | -5.5 | W +2.5 | 138.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 1 | @ | L 78-81 | -7.5 | L −10.5 | 136.5 | O 159 |
| Feb 5 | @ | W 80-75 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 144.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 70-65 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 135.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 13 | @ | L 71-78 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 147.5 | O 149 |
| Feb 15 | vs | W 83-74 | -3.5 | W +5.5 | 141.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 20 | @ | L 64-72 | +1.5 | L −6.5 | 140.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 22 | @ | L 63-72 | +5.5 | L −3.5 | 135.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 27 | vs | W 75-65 | -7.5 | W +2.5 | 145.5 | U 140 |
| Mar 1 | @ | W 63-56 | +4.5 | W +11.5 | 132.5 | U 119 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 55-74 | -1.5 | L −20.5 | 137.5 | U 129 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
HALL
L 50-77
−13.5
8
vs
FDU
W 93-83
+3.5
12
@
VCU
L 61-78
+3.5
18
@
DEL
L 70-81
−6.5
22
vs
UML
W 68-66
−6.5
29
vs
DART
L 61-87
−29.5
5
vs
CAN
W 69-57
+2.5
7
vs
NIA
W 71-43
+22.5
13
@
GTWN
L 68-76
+12.5
29
@
FAIR
W 70-66
+6.5
2
vs
MRST
W 69-59
+12.5
9
@
MSM
L 65-70
−6.5
11
vs
MRMK
W 76-63
+11.5
14
@
QUIN
W 74-70
+10.5
17
vs
RID
W 69-58
+0.5
19
vs
IONA
W 77-63
+10.5
24
@
MRMK
L 59-67
−5.5
30
vs
MSM
W 66-58
+2.5
1
@
RID
L 78-81
−10.5
5
@
MAN
W 80-75
+0.5
7
vs
SIE
W 70-65
+6.5
13
@
SHU
L 71-78
−8.5
15
vs
FAIR
W 83-74
+5.5
20
@
IONA
L 64-72
−6.5
22
@
SIE
L 63-72
−3.5
27
vs
MAN
W 75-65
+2.5
1
@
MRST
W 63-56
+11.5
6
vs
FAIR
L 55-74
−20.5
covered 17didn’t cover 11avg +0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
HALL
L 50-77
−2.5
8
vs
FDU
W 93-83
+38.5
12
@
VCU
L 61-78
−8.5
18
@
DEL
L 70-81
+13.5
22
vs
UML
W 68-66
−13.5
29
vs
DART
L 61-87
+3.5
5
vs
CAN
W 69-57
−3.5
7
vs
NIA
W 71-43
−17.5
13
@
GTWN
L 68-76
+3.5
29
@
FAIR
W 70-66
−4.5
2
vs
MRST
W 69-59
−5.5
9
@
MSM
L 65-70
−6.5
11
vs
MRMK
W 76-63
+5.5
14
@
QUIN
W 74-70
+3.5
17
vs
RID
W 69-58
−7.5
19
vs
IONA
W 77-63
−1.5
24
@
MRMK
L 59-67
−8.5
30
vs
MSM
W 66-58
−14.5
1
@
RID
L 78-81
+22.5
5
@
MAN
W 80-75
+10.5
7
vs
SIE
W 70-65
−0.5
13
@
SHU
L 71-78
+1.5
15
vs
FAIR
W 83-74
+15.5
20
@
IONA
L 64-72
−4.5
22
@
SIE
L 63-72
−0.5
27
vs
MAN
W 75-65
−5.5
1
@
MRST
W 63-56
−13.5
6
vs
FAIR
L 55-74
−8.5
over 10under 18avg −0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Columbia
26 games played
Straight up
14-12
54% wins
Against the spread
14-12
54% covers · avg +0.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-12
54% overs · avg −1.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | @ | W 71-53 | -7.5 | W +10.5 | 148.5 | U 124 |
| Nov 10 | @ | L 62-89 | +32.5 | W +5.5 | 155.5 | U 151 |
| Nov 13 | vs | W 86-72 | -13.5 | W +0.5 | 156.5 | O 158 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 54-49 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 144.5 | U 103 |
| Nov 21 | @ | W 82-67 | -2.5 | W +12.5 | 143.5 | O 149 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 95-70 | -3.5 | W +21.5 | 153.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 26 | @ | W 106-77 | -3.5 | W +25.5 | 150.5 | O 183 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 72-70 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 144.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 93-65 | -13.5 | W +14.5 | 144.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 9 | @ | L 73-77 | -4.5 | L −8.5 | 146.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 56-74 | +8.5 | L −9.5 | 153.5 | U 130 |
| Dec 28 | @ | W 90-82 | -11.5 | L −3.5 | 162.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 5 | @ | W 104-99 | +3.5 | W +8.5 | 170.5 | O 203 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 54-79 | -5.5 | L −30.5 | 145.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 80-86 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 143.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 19 | @ | L 74-91 | +9.5 | L −7.5 | 150.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 79-69 | -2.5 | W +7.5 | 156.5 | U 148 |
| Jan 30 | vs | W 72-67 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 153.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 68-80 | -5.5 | L −17.5 | 139.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 67-88 | +1.5 | L −19.5 | 171.5 | U 155 |
| Feb 13 | @ | L 67-76 | +1.5 | L −7.5 | 148.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 75-65 | -1.5 | W +8.5 | 137.5 | O 140 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 63-64 | -6.5 | L −7.5 | 150.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 27 | vs | W 80-62 | -5.5 | W +12.5 | 140.5 | O 142 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 54-60 | +6.5 | W +0.5 | 147.5 | U 114 |
| Mar 6 | @ | L 71-81 | +4.5 | L −5.5 | 136.5 | O 152 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
@
NHVN
W 71-53
+10.5
10
@
CONN
L 62-89
+5.5
13
vs
UML
W 86-72
+0.5
18
vs
BU
W 54-49
+0.5
21
@
LEH
W 82-67
+12.5
23
vs
LONG
W 95-70
+21.5
26
@
FAIR
W 106-77
+25.5
3
vs
HOF
W 72-70
−1.5
6
vs
UALB
W 93-65
+14.5
9
@
STBK
L 73-77
−8.5
21
@
CAL
L 56-74
−9.5
28
@
UNF
W 90-82
−3.5
5
@
COR
W 104-99
+8.5
10
vs
HARV
L 54-79
−30.5
17
@
BRWN
L 80-86
−8.5
19
@
YALE
L 74-91
−7.5
24
@
DART
W 79-69
+7.5
30
vs
PENN
W 72-67
+0.5
31
vs
PRIN
L 68-80
−17.5
7
vs
COR
L 67-88
−19.5
13
@
PENN
L 67-76
−7.5
14
@
PRIN
W 75-65
+8.5
21
vs
DART
L 63-64
−7.5
27
vs
BRWN
W 80-62
+12.5
28
vs
YALE
L 54-60
+0.5
6
@
HARV
L 71-81
−5.5
covered 14didn’t cover 12avg +0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
@
NHVN
W 71-53
−24.5
10
@
CONN
L 62-89
−4.5
13
vs
UML
W 86-72
+1.5
18
vs
BU
W 54-49
−41.5
21
@
LEH
W 82-67
+5.5
23
vs
LONG
W 95-70
+11.5
26
@
FAIR
W 106-77
+32.5
3
vs
HOF
W 72-70
−2.5
6
vs
UALB
W 93-65
+13.5
9
@
STBK
L 73-77
+3.5
21
@
CAL
L 56-74
−23.5
28
@
UNF
W 90-82
+9.5
5
@
COR
W 104-99
+32.5
10
vs
HARV
L 54-79
−12.5
17
@
BRWN
L 80-86
+22.5
19
@
YALE
L 74-91
+14.5
24
@
DART
W 79-69
−8.5
30
vs
PENN
W 72-67
−14.5
31
vs
PRIN
L 68-80
+8.5
7
vs
COR
L 67-88
−16.5
13
@
PENN
L 67-76
−5.5
14
@
PRIN
W 75-65
+2.5
21
vs
DART
L 63-64
−23.5
27
vs
BRWN
W 80-62
+1.5
28
vs
YALE
L 54-60
−33.5
6
@
HARV
L 71-81
+15.5
over 14under 12avg −1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Columbia has the better starters
Position by position: Saint Peter's 0, Columbia 2, even 3
Saint Peter'sBetterColumbia
G B. Wilson TR9.7 pts · 4.3 reb · 1 ast
Score 29
→COLUSmall
G M. Franklin9.4 pts · 4.1 reb · 1 ast
Score 48
G B. Eaton11.2 pts · 3 reb · 3.9 ast
Score 56
=Even
G G. O'Keefe7.9 pts · 1.8 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 45
G E. Perkins4 pts · 3 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 9
→COLUSmall
G H. Sanders4.2 pts · 1.7 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 38
G S. Simpson3.1 pts · 1.6 reb · 0.3 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F M. Ritter6.9 pts · 5 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 21
F T. Patterson TR1.4 pts · 1.6 reb · 0 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F C. Igoe8.2 pts · 5.4 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 72
Saint Peter'sBetterColumbia
SPU offense336th of 366 · -11.0
→COLUBig
COLU defense198th of 366 · -4.8
SPU defense182nd of 366 · -4.1
=Even
COLU offense163rd of 366 · -4.9
Backcourt-6.2 · 4 players
→COLUBig
Backcourt-2.1 · 3 players
Frontcourt-0.6 · 1 player
=Even
Frontcourt-1.1 · 2 players
Bench-1.1 · 3 players
=Even
Bench-1.9 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestSPU betterCOLU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
B. Wilson28 min · TRB. Eaton28 minE. Perkins26 minS. Simpson11 minP. Glassnor6 min · TRK. WalkerNew
Forwards
T. Patterson8 min · TRB. Tshilobo2 min · TRA. WatsonNewX. ThomasNewJ. MathewsNew
Centers
J. Noudjihidi7 min · TR
Guards
M. Franklin24 minG. O'Keefe21 minH. Sanders15 minJ. Cunningham4 minD. VesseyNewN. RomanelliNew
Forwards
M. Ritter25 minC. Igoe20 minD. Langford11 min · TRR. Nweke8 minL. Coleman4 minN. ClarksonNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 69.2 #296 | Points per game | 74.9 #167 |
| 1.05 #252 | Points per possession | 1.10 #130 |
| 66.1 #308 | Pace (possessions) | 67.8 #237 |
| Shooting | ||
| 46.4 #347 | Effective FG% | 53.5 #83 |
| 31.0 #321 | 3-point % | 35.9 #61 |
| 38.8 #197 | 3-point attempt rate | 37.5 #221 |
| 35.5 #163 | Free throw rate | 28.6 #337 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.7 #251 | Turnover rate | 19.3 #332 |
| 37.0 #16 | Offensive rebound rate | 36.0 #23 |
| 12.5 #253 | Assists per game | 15.0 #90 |
| Defense | ||
| 69.1 #48 | Points allowed | 73.5 #145 |
| 1.04 #78 | Points allowed per possession | 1.09 #188 |
| 48.1 #39 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.2 #168 |
| 32.1 #68 | Opponent 3-point % | 35.2 #258 |
| 20.0 #23 | Turnovers forced | 15.1 #282 |
| 65.3 #330 | Defensive rebound rate | 72.8 #42 |
| 8.8 #13 | Steals per game | 5.7 #270 |
| 3.9 #92 | Blocks per game | 3.0 #235 |
Saint Peter's
16-12 in 2025-26 overall · 14-7 in conference · Metro Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Fairfield55–74
- W@ Marist63–56
- Wvs Manhattan75–65
- L@ Siena63–72
- L@ Iona64–72
A week or more of rest.
Columbia
14-12 in 2025-26 overall · 5-9 in conference · Ivy League
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Harvard71–81
- Lvs Yale54–60
- Wvs Brown80–62
- Lvs Dartmouth63–64
- W@ Princeton75–65
A week or more of rest.