Yanitelli Center · at Saint Peter's · Conference game
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | SPU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects SPU 75–69 · win probability SPU 70%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 144.2
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: SPU has more of the edges
SHU 1, SPU 4 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Turnovers
Turnover rate: SHU 17.6%, SPU 17.7%. Forced: SHU 14.6%, SPU 20.0%
Free throws
Free throw rate: SHU 31.0, SPU 35.5. Allowed: SHU 27.0, SPU 46.4
SHU offense vs SPU defense
Offense 281st of 366 against a defense 182nd, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 67 possessions: SHU plays 68.6 a game (201st fastest), SPU 66.1 (308th). Faster games mean more points
Home court
SPU at home. This season: SPU 0-0 at home, SHU 0-0 away
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: SHU 28.6%, SPU 37.0%. Defensive: SHU 69.1%, SPU 65.3%
Even
Three-pointers
SHU hits 35.7% and allows 34.9%; SPU hits 31.0% and allows 32.1%. Threes are 50.7% and 38.8% of their shots
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: SHU 18%, SPU 32%. Transfers in: SHU 3, SPU 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: SHU 52.0 and allows 53.5; SPU 46.4 and allows 48.1
Context
Schedule so far
SHU has played the 340th-hardest schedule, SPU the 335th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
SPU offense vs SHU defense
Offense 336th of 366 against a defense 334th, on the model’s ratings
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | SPU -6.0 | — |
| Total | — | 144.2 | — |
| Projected score | — | SHU 69.1 · SPU 75.1 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | SPU -3.5 | — |
| 1H total | 67.5 | — |
| 1H projected score | SHU 32 · SPU 35.5 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% | |
| 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
SHU 1–2 SPUSPU leads · 3 games since 2021-22 · SHU 1-2 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2025-26 | SPU 71 @ SHU 78 | SHU +1.5 | SHU W |
| Feb 23, 2024-25 | SHU 79 @ SPU 85 | SPU -1.5 | SPU W |
| Jan 18, 2024-25 | SPU 66 @ SHU 61 | SHU -2.5 | SPU W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Sacred Heart
32 games played
Straight up
13-19
41% wins
Against the spread
15-17
47% covers · avg −1.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-17
47% overs · avg +1.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | @ | L 80-92 | +12.5 | W +0.5 | 157.5 | O 172 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 60-94 | +19.5 | L −14.5 | 160.5 | U 154 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 64-81 | +5.5 | L −11.5 | 165.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 79-66 | -7.5 | W +5.5 | 152.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 24 | @ | L 106-108 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 143.5 | O 214 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 59-90 | +14.5 | L −16.5 | 160.5 | U 149 |
| Dec 3 | @ | W 87-80 | -1.5 | W +5.5 | 152.5 | O 167 |
| Dec 7 | vs | L 69-81 | -1.5 | L −13.5 | 163.5 | U 150 |
| Dec 13 | @ | W 65-49 | -6.5 | W +9.5 | 151.5 | U 114 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 82-87 | -2.5 | L −7.5 | 151.5 | O 169 |
| Dec 19 | vs | W 85-63 | +1.5 | W +23.5 | 155.5 | U 148 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 47-72 | +13.5 | L −11.5 | 145.5 | U 119 |
| Dec 29 | vs | L 72-80 | -1.5 | L −9.5 | 144.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 2 | @ | L 61-64 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 139.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 78-82 | -5.5 | L −9.5 | 141.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 9 | vs | L 72-76 | +5.5 | W +1.5 | 143.5 | O 148 |
| Jan 11 | vs | L 60-70 | +5.5 | L −4.5 | 152.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 86-80 | +8.5 | W +14.5 | 139.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 19 | @ | W 105-85 | -4.5 | W +15.5 | 144.5 | O 190 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 69-66 | -10.5 | L −7.5 | 145.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 71-70 | -9.5 | L −8.5 | 139.5 | O 141 |
| Jan 30 | @ | W 98-91 | +8.5 | W +15.5 | 156.5 | O 189 |
| Feb 1 | @ | L 58-75 | +5.5 | L −11.5 | 147.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 5 | vs | L 87-92 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 155.5 | O 179 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 68-80 | -1.5 | L −13.5 | 161.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 13 | vs | W 78-71 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 147.5 | O 149 |
| Feb 15 | vs | W 86-75 | -9.5 | W +1.5 | 146.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 20 | @ | L 68-78 | +4.5 | L −5.5 | 158.5 | U 146 |
| Feb 22 | @ | L 63-65 | +7.5 | W +5.5 | 146.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 27 | vs | W 77-69 | -2.5 | W +5.5 | 150.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 91-80 | +3.5 | W +14.5 | 149.5 | O 171 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 48-70 | +6.5 | L −15.5 | 143.5 | U 118 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
@
DUQ
L 80-92
+0.5
11
@
VILL
L 60-94
−14.5
15
@
QUC
L 64-81
−11.5
21
vs
HC
W 79-66
+5.5
24
@
CCSU
L 106-108
+1.5
29
@
PSU
L 59-90
−16.5
3
@
MSM
W 87-80
+5.5
7
vs
IONA
L 69-81
−13.5
13
@
NJIT
W 65-49
+9.5
16
@
UML
L 82-87
−7.5
19
vs
DART
W 85-63
+23.5
22
@
TOW
L 47-72
−11.5
29
vs
MRMK
L 72-80
−9.5
2
@
NIA
L 61-64
−4.5
4
@
CAN
L 78-82
−9.5
9
vs
MRST
L 72-76
+1.5
11
vs
QUIN
L 60-70
−4.5
14
@
SIE
W 86-80
+14.5
19
@
RID
W 105-85
+15.5
22
vs
CAN
W 69-66
−7.5
24
vs
NIA
W 71-70
−8.5
30
@
QUIN
W 98-91
+15.5
1
@
MRMK
L 58-75
−11.5
5
vs
FAIR
L 87-92
−6.5
7
@
MAN
L 68-80
−13.5
13
vs
SPU
W 78-71
+8.5
15
vs
RID
W 86-75
+1.5
20
@
FAIR
L 68-78
−5.5
22
@
MRST
L 63-65
+5.5
27
vs
MSM
W 77-69
+5.5
5
vs
IONA
W 91-80
+14.5
6
vs
MRMK
L 48-70
−15.5
covered 15didn’t cover 17avg −1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
@
DUQ
L 80-92
+14.5
11
@
VILL
L 60-94
−6.5
15
@
QUC
L 64-81
−20.5
21
vs
HC
W 79-66
−7.5
24
@
CCSU
L 106-108
+70.5
29
@
PSU
L 59-90
−11.5
3
@
MSM
W 87-80
+14.5
7
vs
IONA
L 69-81
−13.5
13
@
NJIT
W 65-49
−37.5
16
@
UML
L 82-87
+17.5
19
vs
DART
W 85-63
−7.5
22
@
TOW
L 47-72
−26.5
29
vs
MRMK
L 72-80
+7.5
2
@
NIA
L 61-64
−14.5
4
@
CAN
L 78-82
+18.5
9
vs
MRST
L 72-76
+4.5
11
vs
QUIN
L 60-70
−22.5
14
@
SIE
W 86-80
+26.5
19
@
RID
W 105-85
+45.5
22
vs
CAN
W 69-66
−10.5
24
vs
NIA
W 71-70
+1.5
30
@
QUIN
W 98-91
+32.5
1
@
MRMK
L 58-75
−14.5
5
vs
FAIR
L 87-92
+23.5
7
@
MAN
L 68-80
−13.5
13
vs
SPU
W 78-71
+1.5
15
vs
RID
W 86-75
+14.5
20
@
FAIR
L 68-78
−12.5
22
@
MRST
L 63-65
−18.5
27
vs
MSM
W 77-69
−4.5
5
vs
IONA
W 91-80
+21.5
6
vs
MRMK
L 48-70
−25.5
over 15under 17avg +1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Saint Peter's
28 games played
Straight up
16-12
57% wins
Against the spread
17-11
61% covers · avg +0.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
10-18
36% overs · avg −0.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 50-77 | +13.5 | L −13.5 | 129.5 | U 127 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 93-83 | -6.5 | W +3.5 | 137.5 | O 176 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 61-78 | +20.5 | W +3.5 | 147.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 70-81 | +4.5 | L −6.5 | 137.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 68-66 | -8.5 | L −6.5 | 147.5 | U 134 |
| Nov 29 | vs | L 61-87 | -3.5 | L −29.5 | 144.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 5 | vs | W 69-57 | -9.5 | W +2.5 | 129.5 | U 126 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 71-43 | -5.5 | W +22.5 | 131.5 | U 114 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 68-76 | +20.5 | W +12.5 | 140.5 | O 144 |
| Dec 29 | @ | W 70-66 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 140.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 2 | vs | W 69-59 | +2.5 | W +12.5 | 133.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 9 | @ | L 65-70 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 141.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 11 | vs | W 76-63 | -1.5 | W +11.5 | 133.5 | O 139 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 74-70 | +6.5 | W +10.5 | 140.5 | O 144 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 69-58 | -10.5 | W +0.5 | 134.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 19 | vs | W 77-63 | -3.5 | W +10.5 | 141.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 59-67 | +2.5 | L −5.5 | 134.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 30 | vs | W 66-58 | -5.5 | W +2.5 | 138.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 1 | @ | L 78-81 | -7.5 | L −10.5 | 136.5 | O 159 |
| Feb 5 | @ | W 80-75 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 144.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 70-65 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 135.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 13 | @ | L 71-78 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 147.5 | O 149 |
| Feb 15 | vs | W 83-74 | -3.5 | W +5.5 | 141.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 20 | @ | L 64-72 | +1.5 | L −6.5 | 140.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 22 | @ | L 63-72 | +5.5 | L −3.5 | 135.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 27 | vs | W 75-65 | -7.5 | W +2.5 | 145.5 | U 140 |
| Mar 1 | @ | W 63-56 | +4.5 | W +11.5 | 132.5 | U 119 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 55-74 | -1.5 | L −20.5 | 137.5 | U 129 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
HALL
L 50-77
−13.5
8
vs
FDU
W 93-83
+3.5
12
@
VCU
L 61-78
+3.5
18
@
DEL
L 70-81
−6.5
22
vs
UML
W 68-66
−6.5
29
vs
DART
L 61-87
−29.5
5
vs
CAN
W 69-57
+2.5
7
vs
NIA
W 71-43
+22.5
13
@
GTWN
L 68-76
+12.5
29
@
FAIR
W 70-66
+6.5
2
vs
MRST
W 69-59
+12.5
9
@
MSM
L 65-70
−6.5
11
vs
MRMK
W 76-63
+11.5
14
@
QUIN
W 74-70
+10.5
17
vs
RID
W 69-58
+0.5
19
vs
IONA
W 77-63
+10.5
24
@
MRMK
L 59-67
−5.5
30
vs
MSM
W 66-58
+2.5
1
@
RID
L 78-81
−10.5
5
@
MAN
W 80-75
+0.5
7
vs
SIE
W 70-65
+6.5
13
@
SHU
L 71-78
−8.5
15
vs
FAIR
W 83-74
+5.5
20
@
IONA
L 64-72
−6.5
22
@
SIE
L 63-72
−3.5
27
vs
MAN
W 75-65
+2.5
1
@
MRST
W 63-56
+11.5
6
vs
FAIR
L 55-74
−20.5
covered 17didn’t cover 11avg +0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
HALL
L 50-77
−2.5
8
vs
FDU
W 93-83
+38.5
12
@
VCU
L 61-78
−8.5
18
@
DEL
L 70-81
+13.5
22
vs
UML
W 68-66
−13.5
29
vs
DART
L 61-87
+3.5
5
vs
CAN
W 69-57
−3.5
7
vs
NIA
W 71-43
−17.5
13
@
GTWN
L 68-76
+3.5
29
@
FAIR
W 70-66
−4.5
2
vs
MRST
W 69-59
−5.5
9
@
MSM
L 65-70
−6.5
11
vs
MRMK
W 76-63
+5.5
14
@
QUIN
W 74-70
+3.5
17
vs
RID
W 69-58
−7.5
19
vs
IONA
W 77-63
−1.5
24
@
MRMK
L 59-67
−8.5
30
vs
MSM
W 66-58
−14.5
1
@
RID
L 78-81
+22.5
5
@
MAN
W 80-75
+10.5
7
vs
SIE
W 70-65
−0.5
13
@
SHU
L 71-78
+1.5
15
vs
FAIR
W 83-74
+15.5
20
@
IONA
L 64-72
−4.5
22
@
SIE
L 63-72
−0.5
27
vs
MAN
W 75-65
−5.5
1
@
MRST
W 63-56
−13.5
6
vs
FAIR
L 55-74
−8.5
over 10under 18avg −0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: Sacred Heart 1, Saint Peter's 1, even 3
Sacred HeartBetterSaint Peter's
G J. Van Buggenhout TR6.4 pts · 2.1 reb · 3.1 ast
Score 42
=Even
G B. Wilson TR9.7 pts · 4.3 reb · 1 ast
Score 29
G J. Slaughter5.3 pts · 3.4 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 20
→SPUBig
G B. Eaton11.2 pts · 3 reb · 3.9 ast
Score 56
G S. Reilly TR3.6 pts · 0.6 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 47
←SHUBig
G E. Perkins4 pts · 3 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 9
F A. Yadd6 pts · 2.4 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 5
=No call
G S. Simpson3.1 pts · 1.6 reb · 0.3 ast
Not ranked
F J. Robinson TR2.5 pts · 1.4 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 26
=No call
F T. Patterson TR1.4 pts · 1.6 reb · 0 ast
Not ranked
Sacred HeartBetterSaint Peter's
SHU offense281st of 366 · -8.7
→SPUSmall
SPU defense182nd of 366 · -4.1
SHU defense334th of 366 · -8.8
=Even
SPU offense336th of 366 · -11.0
Backcourt-3.0 · 3 players
←SHUBig
Backcourt-6.2 · 4 players
Frontcourt-2.6 · 2 players
→SPUSmall
Frontcourt-0.6 · 1 player
Bench-0.0 · 1 player
←SHUSmall
Bench-1.1 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestSHU betterSPU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Van Buggenhout21 min · TRJ. Slaughter21 minS. Reilly9 min · TRM. Sheppard1 minG. BarroukNewJ. WallaceNew
Forwards
A. Yadd15 minJ. Robinson10 min · TRK. CurtisNewL. KrygierNew
Guards
B. Wilson28 min · TRB. Eaton28 minE. Perkins26 minS. Simpson11 minP. Glassnor6 min · TRK. WalkerNew
Forwards
T. Patterson8 min · TRB. Tshilobo2 min · TRA. WatsonNewX. ThomasNewJ. MathewsNew
Centers
J. Noudjihidi7 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 74.3 #186 | Points per game | 69.2 #296 |
| 1.08 #180 | Points per possession | 1.05 #252 |
| 68.6 #201 | Pace (possessions) | 66.1 #308 |
| Shooting | ||
| 52.0 #145 | Effective FG% | 46.4 #347 |
| 35.7 #73 | 3-point % | 31.0 #321 |
| 50.7 #12 | 3-point attempt rate | 38.8 #197 |
| 31.0 #281 | Free throw rate | 35.5 #163 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.6 #249 | Turnover rate | 17.7 #251 |
| 28.6 #246 | Offensive rebound rate | 37.0 #16 |
| 14.6 #112 | Assists per game | 12.5 #253 |
| Defense | ||
| 77.6 #253 | Points allowed | 69.1 #48 |
| 1.13 #296 | Points allowed per possession | 1.04 #78 |
| 53.5 #283 | Opponent effective FG% | 48.1 #39 |
| 34.9 #241 | Opponent 3-point % | 32.1 #68 |
| 14.6 #320 | Turnovers forced | 20.0 #23 |
| 69.1 #199 | Defensive rebound rate | 65.3 #330 |
| 5.4 #305 | Steals per game | 8.8 #13 |
| 3.0 #223 | Blocks per game | 3.9 #92 |
Sacred Heart
13-19 in 2025-26 overall · 10-12 in conference · Metro Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Merrimack48–70
- Wvs Iona91–80
- Wvs Mount St Marys77–69
- L@ Marist63–65
- L@ Fairfield68–78
A week or more of rest.
Saint Peter's
16-12 in 2025-26 overall · 14-7 in conference · Metro Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Fairfield55–74
- W@ Marist63–56
- Wvs Manhattan75–65
- L@ Siena63–72
- L@ Iona64–72
A week or more of rest.