Levien Gymnasium · at Columbia
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | COLU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects COLU 85–72 · win probability COLU 86%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 156.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: COLU has more of the edges
UNF 0, COLU 4 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: UNF 25.2%, COLU 36.0%. Defensive: UNF 62.4%, COLU 72.8%
COLU offense vs UNF defense
Offense 163rd of 366 against a defense 363rd, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: UNF plays 72.3 a game (31st fastest), COLU 67.8 (237th). Faster games mean more points
Shooting
Effective FG%: UNF 52.9 and allows 56.3; COLU 53.5 and allows 51.2
Home court
COLU at home. This season: COLU 0-0 at home, UNF 0-0 away
Even
UNF offense vs COLU defense
Offense 228th of 366 against a defense 198th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: UNF 45%, COLU 61%. Transfers in: UNF 3, COLU 1. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: UNF 28.8, COLU 28.6. Allowed: UNF 31.4, COLU 33.5
Even
Three-pointers
UNF hits 35.0% and allows 35.1%; COLU hits 35.9% and allows 35.2%. Threes are 51.7% and 37.5% of their shots
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: UNF 17.8%, COLU 19.3%. Forced: UNF 12.8%, COLU 15.1%
Context
Schedule so far
UNF has played the 168th-hardest schedule, COLU the 169th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | COLU -12.3 | — |
| Total | — | 156.8 | — |
| Projected score | — | UNF 72.3 · COLU 84.5 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | COLU -7.2 | — |
| 1H total | 73.3 | — |
| 1H projected score | UNF 33 · COLU 40.2 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2-8 20% | 6-4 60% | 3-7 30% | |
| 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
UNF 0–1 COLUCOLU leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · UNF 1-0 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 28, 2025-26 | COLU 90 @ UNF 82 | UNF +11.5 | UNF W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
North Florida
30 games played
Straight up
5-25
17% wins
Against the spread
18-12
60% covers · avg +1.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-14
53% overs · avg +3.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6 | @ | L 64-104 | +43.5 | W +3.5 | 169.5 | U 168 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 66-99 | +41.5 | W +8.5 | 155.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 78-86 | +10.5 | W +2.5 | 161.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 22 | vs | L 83-92 | +9.5 | W +0.5 | 154.5 | O 175 |
| Nov 23 | vs | L 82-85 | +3.5 | W +0.5 | 160.5 | O 167 |
| Dec 2 | vs | L 63-72 | +7.5 | L −1.5 | 153.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 7 | @ | L 58-109 | +42.5 | L −8.5 | 166.5 | O 167 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 61-84 | +30.5 | W +7.5 | 159.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 18 | @ | L 90-113 | +10.5 | L −12.5 | 163.5 | O 203 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 67-105 | +37.5 | L −0.5 | 171.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 28 | vs | L 82-90 | +11.5 | W +3.5 | 162.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 83-102 | +15.5 | L −3.5 | 162.5 | O 185 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 74-82 | +18.5 | W +10.5 | 172.5 | U 156 |
| Jan 8 | vs | L 73-85 | +2.5 | L −9.5 | 164.5 | U 158 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 82-89 | +11.5 | W +4.5 | 173.5 | U 171 |
| Jan 15 | @ | W 105-91 | +9.5 | W +23.5 | 157.5 | O 196 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 69-98 | +12.5 | L −16.5 | 164.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 87-85 | +8.5 | W +10.5 | 166.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 117-114 | +3.5 | W +6.5 | 164.5 | O 231 |
| Jan 29 | vs | L 77-84 | +1.5 | L −5.5 | 165.5 | U 161 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 94-100 | +10.5 | W +4.5 | 165.5 | O 194 |
| Feb 5 | @ | W 81-73 | +5.5 | W +13.5 | 166.5 | U 154 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 72-91 | +15.5 | L −3.5 | 178.5 | U 163 |
| Feb 11 | @ | L 81-90 | +13.5 | W +4.5 | 163.5 | O 171 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 56-63 | +7.5 | W +0.5 | 153.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 19 | vs | L 76-77 | +11.5 | W +10.5 | 166.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 71-76 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 161.5 | U 147 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 76-70 | +6.5 | W +12.5 | 160.5 | U 146 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 61-85 | +1.5 | L −22.5 | 151.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 4 | vs | L 85-93 | +3.5 | L −4.5 | 160.5 | O 178 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
6
@
FLA
L 64-104
+3.5
12
@
TENN
L 66-99
+8.5
19
@
WOF
L 78-86
+2.5
22
vs
USM
L 83-92
+0.5
23
vs
PV
L 82-85
+0.5
2
vs
SIUE
L 63-72
−1.5
7
@
GONZ
L 58-109
−8.5
13
@
DAY
L 61-84
+7.5
18
@
CHSO
L 90-113
−12.5
21
@
MIA
L 67-105
−0.5
28
vs
COLU
L 82-90
+3.5
1
@
APSU
L 83-102
−3.5
3
@
LIP
L 74-82
+10.5
8
vs
WGA
L 73-85
−9.5
10
vs
QUC
L 82-89
+4.5
15
@
UNA
W 105-91
+23.5
17
@
CARK
L 69-98
−16.5
22
vs
EKU
W 87-85
+10.5
24
vs
BELL
W 117-114
+6.5
29
vs
STET
L 77-84
−5.5
31
vs
LIP
L 94-100
+4.5
5
@
WGA
W 81-73
+13.5
7
@
QUC
L 72-91
−3.5
11
@
FGCU
L 81-90
+4.5
14
@
JAX
L 56-63
+0.5
19
vs
APSU
L 76-77
+10.5
21
@
STET
L 71-76
−3.5
26
vs
FGCU
W 76-70
+12.5
28
vs
JAX
L 61-85
−22.5
4
vs
WGA
L 85-93
−4.5
covered 18didn’t cover 12avg +1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
6
@
FLA
L 64-104
−1.5
12
@
TENN
L 66-99
+9.5
19
@
WOF
L 78-86
+2.5
22
vs
USM
L 83-92
+20.5
23
vs
PV
L 82-85
+6.5
2
vs
SIUE
L 63-72
−18.5
7
@
GONZ
L 58-109
+0.5
13
@
DAY
L 61-84
−14.5
18
@
CHSO
L 90-113
+39.5
21
@
MIA
L 67-105
+0.5
28
vs
COLU
L 82-90
+9.5
1
@
APSU
L 83-102
+22.5
3
@
LIP
L 74-82
−16.5
8
vs
WGA
L 73-85
−6.5
10
vs
QUC
L 82-89
−2.5
15
@
UNA
W 105-91
+38.5
17
@
CARK
L 69-98
+2.5
22
vs
EKU
W 87-85
+5.5
24
vs
BELL
W 117-114
+66.5
29
vs
STET
L 77-84
−4.5
31
vs
LIP
L 94-100
+28.5
5
@
WGA
W 81-73
−12.5
7
@
QUC
L 72-91
−15.5
11
@
FGCU
L 81-90
+7.5
14
@
JAX
L 56-63
−34.5
19
vs
APSU
L 76-77
−13.5
21
@
STET
L 71-76
−14.5
26
vs
FGCU
W 76-70
−14.5
28
vs
JAX
L 61-85
−5.5
4
vs
WGA
L 85-93
+17.5
over 16under 14avg +3.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Columbia
26 games played
Straight up
14-12
54% wins
Against the spread
14-12
54% covers · avg +0.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-12
54% overs · avg −1.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | @ | W 71-53 | -7.5 | W +10.5 | 148.5 | U 124 |
| Nov 10 | @ | L 62-89 | +32.5 | W +5.5 | 155.5 | U 151 |
| Nov 13 | vs | W 86-72 | -13.5 | W +0.5 | 156.5 | O 158 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 54-49 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 144.5 | U 103 |
| Nov 21 | @ | W 82-67 | -2.5 | W +12.5 | 143.5 | O 149 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 95-70 | -3.5 | W +21.5 | 153.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 26 | @ | W 106-77 | -3.5 | W +25.5 | 150.5 | O 183 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 72-70 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 144.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 93-65 | -13.5 | W +14.5 | 144.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 9 | @ | L 73-77 | -4.5 | L −8.5 | 146.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 56-74 | +8.5 | L −9.5 | 153.5 | U 130 |
| Dec 28 | @ | W 90-82 | -11.5 | L −3.5 | 162.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 5 | @ | W 104-99 | +3.5 | W +8.5 | 170.5 | O 203 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 54-79 | -5.5 | L −30.5 | 145.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 80-86 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 143.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 19 | @ | L 74-91 | +9.5 | L −7.5 | 150.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 79-69 | -2.5 | W +7.5 | 156.5 | U 148 |
| Jan 30 | vs | W 72-67 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 153.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 68-80 | -5.5 | L −17.5 | 139.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 67-88 | +1.5 | L −19.5 | 171.5 | U 155 |
| Feb 13 | @ | L 67-76 | +1.5 | L −7.5 | 148.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 75-65 | -1.5 | W +8.5 | 137.5 | O 140 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 63-64 | -6.5 | L −7.5 | 150.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 27 | vs | W 80-62 | -5.5 | W +12.5 | 140.5 | O 142 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 54-60 | +6.5 | W +0.5 | 147.5 | U 114 |
| Mar 6 | @ | L 71-81 | +4.5 | L −5.5 | 136.5 | O 152 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
@
NHVN
W 71-53
+10.5
10
@
CONN
L 62-89
+5.5
13
vs
UML
W 86-72
+0.5
18
vs
BU
W 54-49
+0.5
21
@
LEH
W 82-67
+12.5
23
vs
LONG
W 95-70
+21.5
26
@
FAIR
W 106-77
+25.5
3
vs
HOF
W 72-70
−1.5
6
vs
UALB
W 93-65
+14.5
9
@
STBK
L 73-77
−8.5
21
@
CAL
L 56-74
−9.5
28
@
UNF
W 90-82
−3.5
5
@
COR
W 104-99
+8.5
10
vs
HARV
L 54-79
−30.5
17
@
BRWN
L 80-86
−8.5
19
@
YALE
L 74-91
−7.5
24
@
DART
W 79-69
+7.5
30
vs
PENN
W 72-67
+0.5
31
vs
PRIN
L 68-80
−17.5
7
vs
COR
L 67-88
−19.5
13
@
PENN
L 67-76
−7.5
14
@
PRIN
W 75-65
+8.5
21
vs
DART
L 63-64
−7.5
27
vs
BRWN
W 80-62
+12.5
28
vs
YALE
L 54-60
+0.5
6
@
HARV
L 71-81
−5.5
covered 14didn’t cover 12avg +0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
@
NHVN
W 71-53
−24.5
10
@
CONN
L 62-89
−4.5
13
vs
UML
W 86-72
+1.5
18
vs
BU
W 54-49
−41.5
21
@
LEH
W 82-67
+5.5
23
vs
LONG
W 95-70
+11.5
26
@
FAIR
W 106-77
+32.5
3
vs
HOF
W 72-70
−2.5
6
vs
UALB
W 93-65
+13.5
9
@
STBK
L 73-77
+3.5
21
@
CAL
L 56-74
−23.5
28
@
UNF
W 90-82
+9.5
5
@
COR
W 104-99
+32.5
10
vs
HARV
L 54-79
−12.5
17
@
BRWN
L 80-86
+22.5
19
@
YALE
L 74-91
+14.5
24
@
DART
W 79-69
−8.5
30
vs
PENN
W 72-67
−14.5
31
vs
PRIN
L 68-80
+8.5
7
vs
COR
L 67-88
−16.5
13
@
PENN
L 67-76
−5.5
14
@
PRIN
W 75-65
+2.5
21
vs
DART
L 63-64
−23.5
27
vs
BRWN
W 80-62
+1.5
28
vs
YALE
L 54-60
−33.5
6
@
HARV
L 71-81
+15.5
over 14under 12avg −1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Columbia has the better starters
Position by position: North Florida 0, Columbia 2, even 3
North FloridaBetterColumbia
G K. Jackson14.8 pts · 3.4 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 38
=Even
G M. Franklin9.4 pts · 4.1 reb · 1 ast
Score 48
G B. Plummer7.2 pts · 3.3 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 3
→COLUBig
G G. O'Keefe7.9 pts · 1.8 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 45
G M. Lee7.8 pts · 5.6 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 29
=Even
G H. Sanders4.2 pts · 1.7 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 38
G E. Placer TR8.3 pts · 1.9 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 21
=Even
F M. Ritter6.9 pts · 5 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 21
G E. Elliott TR4.2 pts · 2.8 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 8
→COLUBig
F C. Igoe8.2 pts · 5.4 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 72
North FloridaBetterColumbia
UNF offense228th of 366 · -7.0
=Even
COLU defense198th of 366 · -4.8
UNF defense363rd of 366 · -12.0
→COLUBig
COLU offense163rd of 366 · -4.9
Backcourt-12.6 · 5 players
→COLUBig
Backcourt-2.1 · 3 players
FrontcourtNo numbers yet
=No call
Frontcourt-1.1 · 2 players
Bench-0.7 · 2 players
←UNFSmall
Bench-1.9 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestUNF betterCOLU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
K. Jackson33 minB. Plummer27 minM. Lee26 minE. Placer26 min · TRE. Elliott22 min · TRG. Jacobs3 min
Forwards
A. Bryant8 min · TRA. BegajNewI. BrownNew
Guards
M. Franklin24 minG. O'Keefe21 minH. Sanders15 minJ. Cunningham4 minD. VesseyNewN. RomanelliNew
Forwards
M. Ritter25 minC. Igoe20 minD. Langford11 min · TRR. Nweke8 minL. Coleman4 minN. ClarksonNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 77.1 #112 | Points per game | 74.9 #167 |
| 1.06 #218 | Points per possession | 1.10 #130 |
| 72.3 #31 | Pace (possessions) | 67.8 #237 |
| Shooting | ||
| 52.9 #106 | Effective FG% | 53.5 #83 |
| 35.0 #117 | 3-point % | 35.9 #61 |
| 51.7 #7 | 3-point attempt rate | 37.5 #221 |
| 28.8 #333 | Free throw rate | 28.6 #337 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.8 #261 | Turnover rate | 19.3 #332 |
| 25.2 #335 | Offensive rebound rate | 36.0 #23 |
| 13.4 #185 | Assists per game | 15.0 #90 |
| Defense | ||
| 89.6 #365 | Points allowed | 73.5 #145 |
| 1.24 #364 | Points allowed per possession | 1.09 #188 |
| 56.3 #349 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.2 #168 |
| 35.1 #253 | Opponent 3-point % | 35.2 #258 |
| 12.8 #360 | Turnovers forced | 15.1 #282 |
| 62.4 #361 | Defensive rebound rate | 72.8 #42 |
| 4.6 #352 | Steals per game | 5.7 #270 |
| 1.4 #364 | Blocks per game | 3.0 #235 |
North Florida
5-25 in 2025-26 overall · 5-14 in conference · Atlantic Sun Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs West Georgia85–93
- Lvs Jacksonville61–85
- Wvs FGCU76–70
- L@ Stetson71–76
- Lvs Austin Peay76–77
A week or more of rest.
Columbia
14-12 in 2025-26 overall · 5-9 in conference · Ivy League
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Harvard71–81
- Lvs Yale54–60
- Wvs Brown80–62
- Lvs Dartmouth63–64
- W@ Princeton75–65
A week or more of rest.