Desert Financial Arena · at Arizona St
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | ASU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects ASU 87–65 · win probability ASU 97%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 151.6
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: ASU has more of the edges
MONT 3, ASU 4 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
ASU offense vs MONT defense
Offense 55th of 366 against a defense 294th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
MONT has played the 250th-hardest schedule, ASU the 13th. A record against a soft schedule means less
MONT offense vs ASU defense
Offense 256th of 366 against a defense 60th, on the model’s ratings
Turnovers
Turnover rate: MONT 19.5%, ASU 17.1%. Forced: MONT 14.3%, ASU 18.4%
Three-pointers
MONT hits 36.6% and allows 32.3%; ASU hits 33.4% and allows 35.0%. Threes are 41.8% and 38.4% of their shots
Shooting
Effective FG%: MONT 55.8 and allows 50.5; ASU 51.1 and allows 52.4
Home court
ASU at home. This season: ASU 0-0 at home, MONT 0-0 away
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: MONT 39%, ASU 11%. Transfers in: MONT 0, ASU 6. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: MONT 20.7%, ASU 29.9%. Defensive: MONT 70.4%, ASU 65.1%
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: MONT 36.8, ASU 39.5. Allowed: MONT 32.6, ASU 34.3
Context
Tempo
About 71 possessions: MONT plays 71.1 a game (72nd fastest), ASU 70.6 (93rd). Faster games mean more points
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | ASU -22.2 | — |
| Total | — | 151.6 | — |
| Projected score | — | MONT 64.7 · ASU 86.9 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | ASU -13.1 | — |
| 1H total | 70.8 | — |
| 1H projected score | MONT 28.9 · ASU 42 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | |
| 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | 3-7 30% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Montana
30 games played
Straight up
15-15
50% wins
Against the spread
16-14
53% covers · avg −0.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-16
47% overs · avg −0.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | @ | L 68-91 | +12.5 | L −10.5 | 150.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 11 | @ | W 102-93 | +10.5 | W +19.5 | 157.5 | O 195 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 90-82 | -7.5 | W +0.5 | 168.5 | O 172 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 81-86 | +17.5 | W +12.5 | 164.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 23 | vs | L 63-68 | -4.5 | L −9.5 | 148.5 | U 131 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 87-95 | -4.5 | L −12.5 | 162.5 | O 182 |
| Dec 3 | vs | L 72-81 | -3.5 | L −12.5 | 153.5 | U 153 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 79-75 | -5.5 | L −1.5 | 154.5 | U 154 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 54-94 | +30.5 | L −9.5 | 166.5 | U 148 |
| Jan 1 | vs | W 78-64 | -5.5 | W +8.5 | 149.5 | U 142 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 88-79 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 161.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 8 | @ | W 79-73 | +4.5 | W +10.5 | 154.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 65-66 | +1.5 | W +0.5 | 161.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 67-76 | +5.5 | L −3.5 | 150.5 | U 143 |
| Jan 19 | @ | W 98-72 | -3.5 | W +22.5 | 146.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 81-65 | -4.5 | W +11.5 | 157.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 69-60 | -4.5 | W +4.5 | 148.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 29 | @ | W 64-60 | +4.5 | W +8.5 | 143.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 79-86 | -3.5 | L −10.5 | 155.5 | O 165 |
| Feb 5 | vs | L 74-82 | -5.5 | L −13.5 | 151.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 73-68 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 152.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 71-82 | -2.5 | L −13.5 | 145.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 69-73 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 149.5 | U 142 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 72-92 | +2.5 | L −17.5 | 152.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 81-73 | -7.5 | W +0.5 | 161.5 | U 154 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 74-68 | -1.5 | W +4.5 | 141.5 | O 142 |
| Mar 2 | @ | L 57-85 | +5.5 | L −22.5 | 154.5 | U 142 |
| Mar 9 | vs | W 95-89 | +4.5 | W +10.5 | 152.5 | O 184 |
| Mar 10 | vs | W 75-72 | +3.5 | W +6.5 | 145.5 | O 147 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 66-77 | +3.5 | L −7.5 | 147.5 | U 143 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
@
STAN
L 68-91
−10.5
11
@
UNLV
W 102-93
+19.5
14
vs
CP
W 90-82
+0.5
18
@
TA&M
L 81-86
+12.5
23
vs
LAM
L 63-68
−9.5
25
vs
OAK
L 87-95
−12.5
3
vs
NDSU
L 72-81
−12.5
6
@
UND
W 79-75
−1.5
20
@
LOU
L 54-94
−9.5
1
vs
NAU
W 78-64
+8.5
3
vs
UNCO
W 88-79
+10.5
8
@
IDHO
W 79-73
+10.5
10
@
EWU
L 65-66
+0.5
17
@
MTST
L 67-76
−3.5
19
@
NAU
W 98-72
+22.5
22
vs
WEB
W 81-65
+11.5
24
vs
IDST
W 69-60
+4.5
29
@
PRST
W 64-60
+8.5
31
@
SAC
L 79-86
−10.5
5
vs
EWU
L 74-82
−13.5
7
vs
IDHO
W 73-68
+3.5
14
vs
MTST
L 71-82
−13.5
19
@
IDST
L 69-73
−5.5
21
@
WEB
L 72-92
−17.5
26
vs
SAC
W 81-73
+0.5
28
vs
PRST
W 74-68
+4.5
2
@
UNCO
L 57-85
−22.5
9
vs
UNCO
W 95-89
+10.5
10
vs
PRST
W 75-72
+6.5
11
vs
IDHO
L 66-77
−7.5
covered 16didn’t cover 14avg −0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
@
STAN
L 68-91
+8.5
11
@
UNLV
W 102-93
+37.5
14
vs
CP
W 90-82
+3.5
18
@
TA&M
L 81-86
+2.5
23
vs
LAM
L 63-68
−17.5
25
vs
OAK
L 87-95
+19.5
3
vs
NDSU
L 72-81
−0.5
6
@
UND
W 79-75
−0.5
20
@
LOU
L 54-94
−18.5
1
vs
NAU
W 78-64
−7.5
3
vs
UNCO
W 88-79
+5.5
8
@
IDHO
W 79-73
−2.5
10
@
EWU
L 65-66
−30.5
17
@
MTST
L 67-76
−7.5
19
@
NAU
W 98-72
+23.5
22
vs
WEB
W 81-65
−11.5
24
vs
IDST
W 69-60
−19.5
29
@
PRST
W 64-60
−19.5
31
@
SAC
L 79-86
+9.5
5
vs
EWU
L 74-82
+4.5
7
vs
IDHO
W 73-68
−11.5
14
vs
MTST
L 71-82
+7.5
19
@
IDST
L 69-73
−7.5
21
@
WEB
L 72-92
+11.5
26
vs
SAC
W 81-73
−7.5
28
vs
PRST
W 74-68
+0.5
2
@
UNCO
L 57-85
−12.5
9
vs
UNCO
W 95-89
+31.5
10
vs
PRST
W 75-72
+1.5
11
vs
IDHO
L 66-77
−4.5
over 14under 16avg −0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Arizona St
33 games played
Straight up
17-16
52% wins
Against the spread
20-13
61% covers · avg +0.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-17
48% overs · avg +0.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | W 81-64 | -17.5 | L −0.5 | 151.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 9 | vs | W 81-66 | -12.5 | W +2.5 | 152.5 | U 147 |
| Nov 14 | vs | L 65-77 | +13.5 | W +1.5 | 158.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 17 | vs | W 75-62 | -18.5 | L −5.5 | 145.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 20 | @ | W 83-76 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 143.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 87-86 | +6.5 | W +7.5 | 153.5 | O 173 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 100-94 | -4.5 | W +1.5 | 157.5 | O 194 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 75-88 | +4.5 | L −8.5 | 161.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 86-70 | +5.5 | W +21.5 | 157.5 | U 156 |
| Dec 9 | vs | W 73-48 | -16.5 | W +8.5 | 154.5 | U 121 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 82-79 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 154.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 77-90 | +9.5 | L −3.5 | 142.5 | O 167 |
| Dec 21 | vs | L 75-78 | -12.5 | L −15.5 | 147.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 89-95 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 156.5 | O 184 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 76-104 | +17.5 | L −10.5 | 168.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 87-84 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 169.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 82-89 | +21.5 | W +14.5 | 167.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 18 | @ | L 73-103 | +18.5 | L −11.5 | 142.5 | O 176 |
| Jan 21 | vs | L 63-75 | -1.5 | L −13.5 | 145.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 82-68 | +3.5 | W +17.5 | 146.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 27 | @ | L 76-79 | +6.5 | W +3.5 | 161.5 | U 155 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 74-87 | +14.5 | W +1.5 | 163.5 | U 161 |
| Feb 4 | @ | W 71-63 | +1.5 | W +9.5 | 161.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 70-78 | +3.5 | L −4.5 | 158.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 10 | vs | W 85-76 | -3.5 | W +5.5 | 163.5 | U 161 |
| Feb 17 | vs | W 72-67 | +7.5 | W +12.5 | 156.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 68-73 | +8.5 | W +3.5 | 157.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 24 | @ | L 78-90 | +6.5 | L −5.5 | 149.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 73-60 | -6.5 | W +6.5 | 150.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 70-60 | +5.5 | W +15.5 | 151.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 65-86 | +16.5 | L −4.5 | 148.5 | O 151 |
| Mar 10 | vs | W 83-79 | +5.5 | W +9.5 | 152.5 | O 162 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 42-91 | +13.5 | L −35.5 | 148.5 | U 133 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
SUU
W 81-64
−0.5
9
vs
UTU
W 81-66
+2.5
14
vs
GONZ
L 65-77
+1.5
17
vs
GAST
W 75-62
−5.5
20
@
HAW
W 83-76
+8.5
24
vs
TEX
W 87-86
+7.5
25
vs
WSU
W 100-94
+1.5
26
vs
USC
L 75-88
−8.5
6
vs
OU
W 86-70
+21.5
9
vs
NAU
W 73-48
+8.5
13
vs
SCU
W 82-79
+4.5
17
@
UCLA
L 77-90
−3.5
21
vs
ORST
L 75-78
−15.5
3
vs
COLO
L 89-95
−7.5
7
@
BYU
L 76-104
−10.5
10
vs
KSU
W 87-84
+1.5
14
@
ARIZ
L 82-89
+14.5
18
@
HOU
L 73-103
−11.5
21
vs
WVU
L 63-75
−13.5
24
vs
CIN
W 82-68
+17.5
27
@
UCF
L 76-79
+3.5
31
vs
ARIZ
L 74-87
+1.5
4
@
UTAH
W 71-63
+9.5
7
@
COLO
L 70-78
−4.5
10
vs
OKST
W 85-76
+5.5
17
vs
TTU
W 72-67
+12.5
21
@
BAY
L 68-73
+3.5
24
@
TCU
L 78-90
−5.5
28
vs
UTAH
W 73-60
+6.5
3
vs
KU
W 70-60
+15.5
7
@
ISU
L 65-86
−4.5
10
vs
BAY
W 83-79
+9.5
11
vs
ISU
L 42-91
−35.5
covered 20didn’t cover 13avg +0.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
SUU
W 81-64
−6.5
9
vs
UTU
W 81-66
−5.5
14
vs
GONZ
L 65-77
−16.5
17
vs
GAST
W 75-62
−8.5
20
@
HAW
W 83-76
+15.5
24
vs
TEX
W 87-86
+19.5
25
vs
WSU
W 100-94
+36.5
26
vs
USC
L 75-88
+1.5
6
vs
OU
W 86-70
−1.5
9
vs
NAU
W 73-48
−33.5
13
vs
SCU
W 82-79
+6.5
17
@
UCLA
L 77-90
+24.5
21
vs
ORST
L 75-78
+5.5
3
vs
COLO
L 89-95
+27.5
7
@
BYU
L 76-104
+11.5
10
vs
KSU
W 87-84
+1.5
14
@
ARIZ
L 82-89
+3.5
18
@
HOU
L 73-103
+33.5
21
vs
WVU
L 63-75
−7.5
24
vs
CIN
W 82-68
+3.5
27
@
UCF
L 76-79
−6.5
31
vs
ARIZ
L 74-87
−2.5
4
@
UTAH
W 71-63
−27.5
7
@
COLO
L 70-78
−10.5
10
vs
OKST
W 85-76
−2.5
17
vs
TTU
W 72-67
−17.5
21
@
BAY
L 68-73
−16.5
24
@
TCU
L 78-90
+18.5
28
vs
UTAH
W 73-60
−17.5
3
vs
KU
W 70-60
−21.5
7
@
ISU
L 65-86
+2.5
10
vs
BAY
W 83-79
+9.5
11
vs
ISU
L 42-91
−15.5
over 16under 17avg +0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Arizona St has the better starters
Position by position: Montana 0, Arizona St 2, even 3
MontanaBetterArizona St
G T. Thompson8.4 pts · 3.9 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 24
→ASUBig
G J. Foxwell TR15.8 pts · 4.3 reb · 6.4 ast
Score 79
G C. Anderson5.6 pts · 1 reb · 0.1 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G D. Shaw TR7.5 pts · 5.3 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 55
G C. Dick1.6 pts · 1.2 reb · 0.3 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G E. Innocenti TR6 pts · 3.8 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 58
F K. Aguino8.6 pts · 4.1 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 48
→ASUBig
F P. Murauskas TR18.4 pts · 7.8 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 97
F A. Jedkins0.9 pts · 0.9 reb · 0.1 ast
Not ranked
=No call
C B. Defty TR15.1 pts · 6.8 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 84
MontanaBetterArizona St
MONT offense256th of 366 · -7.8
→ASUBig
ASU defense60th of 366 · +1.2
MONT defense294th of 366 · -7.4
→ASUBig
ASU offense55th of 366 · +3.2
Backcourt-3.2 · 3 players
→ASUBig
Backcourt+1.0 · 3 players
Frontcourt-0.9 · 2 players
→ASUBig
Frontcourt+9.4 · 2 players
BenchNo numbers yet
=No call
Bench-0.9 · 2 players
Score, worst to bestMONT betterASU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
T. Thompson30 minC. Anderson10 minC. Dick9 minG. DutroNewJ. BrownNewJ. ClarkNew
Forwards
K. Aguino24 minA. Jedkins5 minJ. SandersNewC. MpianaNew
Guards
J. Foxwell36 min · TRD. Shaw28 min · TRE. Innocenti24 min · TRB. Ford22 minV. WallaceNewJ. CroyNew
Forwards
P. Murauskas33 min · TRA. NyuonNewM. VaughnsNew
Centers
B. Defty29 min · TRN. Garcia7 min · TRF. MalesevicNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 75.7 #148 | Points per game | 76.3 #133 |
| 1.06 #216 | Points per possession | 1.08 #178 |
| 71.1 #72 | Pace (possessions) | 70.6 #93 |
| Shooting | ||
| 55.8 #23 | Effective FG% | 51.1 #190 |
| 36.6 #38 | 3-point % | 33.4 #202 |
| 41.8 #138 | 3-point attempt rate | 38.4 #201 |
| 36.8 #135 | Free throw rate | 39.5 #66 |
| Possessions | ||
| 19.5 #339 | Turnover rate | 17.1 #211 |
| 20.7 #363 | Offensive rebound rate | 29.9 #206 |
| 14.3 #125 | Assists per game | 13.7 #166 |
| Defense | ||
| 77.6 #254 | Points allowed | 78.3 #273 |
| 1.09 #204 | Points allowed per possession | 1.11 #239 |
| 50.5 #129 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.4 #235 |
| 32.3 #74 | Opponent 3-point % | 35.0 #249 |
| 14.3 #326 | Turnovers forced | 18.4 #77 |
| 70.4 #143 | Defensive rebound rate | 65.1 #337 |
| 5.4 #306 | Steals per game | 7.0 #122 |
| 2.4 #313 | Blocks per game | 4.6 #32 |
Montana
15-15 in 2025-26 overall · 12-9 in conference · Big Sky Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Idaho66–77
- Wvs Portland St75–72
- Wvs N Colorado95–89
- L@ N Colorado57–85
- Wvs Portland St74–68
A week or more of rest.
Arizona St
17-16 in 2025-26 overall · 8-12 in conference · Big 12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Iowa State42–91
- Wvs Baylor83–79
- L@ Iowa State65–86
- Wvs Kansas70–60
- Wvs Utah73–60
A week or more of rest.