Fertitta Center · at Houston
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | HOU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects HOU 95–61 · win probability HOU 100%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 155.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: HOU has more of the edges
QUC 1, HOU 8 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
HOU offense vs QUC defense
Offense 10th of 366 against a defense 331st, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
QUC has played the 194th-hardest schedule, HOU the 17th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Turnovers
Turnover rate: QUC 14.8%, HOU 12.8%. Forced: QUC 15.1%, HOU 20.7%
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: QUC 30.2%, HOU 35.7%. Defensive: QUC 66.4%, HOU 69.7%
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: QUC plays 71.2 a game (65th fastest), HOU 65.0 (346th). Faster games mean more points
Three-pointers
QUC hits 35.7% and allows 36.5%; HOU hits 34.7% and allows 31.6%. Threes are 46.5% and 40.7% of their shots
Free throws
Free throw rate: QUC 35.4, HOU 26.3. Allowed: QUC 38.1, HOU 38.7
QUC offense vs HOU defense
Offense 102nd of 366 against a defense 1st, on the model’s ratings
Shooting
Effective FG%: QUC 56.4 and allows 54.6; HOU 51.9 and allows 46.2
Home court
HOU at home. This season: HOU 0-0 at home, QUC 0-0 away
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: QUC 0%, HOU 26%. Transfers in: QUC 0, HOU 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | HOU -34.9 | — |
| Total | — | 155.8 | — |
| Projected score | — | QUC 60.5 · HOU 95.4 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | HOU -20.6 | — |
| 1H total | 72.8 | — |
| 1H projected score | QUC 26.1 · HOU 46.7 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7-3 70% | 4-6 40% | 8-2 80% | |
| 7-3 70% | 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Queens University Royals
34 games played
Straight up
20-14
59% wins
Against the spread
15-19
44% covers · avg +0.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
22-12
65% overs · avg +6.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | L 74-81 | +3.5 | L −3.5 | 163.5 | U 155 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 74-94 | +17.5 | L −2.5 | 150.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 81-87 | +12.5 | W +6.5 | 162.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 81-64 | -5.5 | W +11.5 | 165.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 101-94 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 150.5 | O 195 |
| Nov 23 | @ | L 79-90 | +8.5 | L −2.5 | 153.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 28 | @ | L 69-94 | +25.5 | W +0.5 | 160.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 107-74 | -14.5 | W +18.5 | 161.5 | O 181 |
| Dec 12 | vs | W 102-78 | -18.5 | W +5.5 | 157.5 | O 180 |
| Dec 14 | @ | L 73-111 | +18.5 | L −19.5 | 165.5 | O 184 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 80-108 | +23.5 | L −4.5 | 169.5 | O 188 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 65-106 | +25.5 | L −15.5 | 171.5 | U 171 |
| Jan 1 | vs | W 91-89 | -4.5 | L −2.5 | 164.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 98-76 | -7.5 | W +14.5 | 169.5 | O 174 |
| Jan 8 | @ | W 77-51 | -4.5 | W +21.5 | 154.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 89-82 | -11.5 | L −4.5 | 173.5 | U 171 |
| Jan 15 | @ | W 85-74 | +1.5 | W +12.5 | 166.5 | U 159 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 87-81 | -10.5 | L −4.5 | 162.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 87-62 | -12.5 | W +12.5 | 162.5 | U 149 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 66-74 | -7.5 | L −15.5 | 162.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 28 | vs | L 90-100 | -5.5 | L −15.5 | 158.5 | O 190 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 75-78 | -5.5 | L −8.5 | 163.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 93-84 | -8.5 | W +0.5 | 146.5 | O 177 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 91-72 | -15.5 | W +3.5 | 178.5 | U 163 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 87-95 | -2.5 | L −10.5 | 161.5 | O 182 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 87-81 | -3.5 | W +2.5 | 165.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 85-78 | -8.5 | L −1.5 | 156.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 91-84 | -11.5 | L −4.5 | 161.5 | O 175 |
| Feb 25 | @ | W 96-79 | -2.5 | W +14.5 | 165.5 | O 175 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 79-84 | +2.5 | L −2.5 | 163.5 | U 163 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 71-63 | -8.5 | L −0.5 | 164.5 | U 134 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 90-83 | +2.5 | W +9.5 | 161.5 | O 173 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 98-93 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 157.5 | O 191 |
| Mar 20 | vs | L 71-104 | +25.5 | L −7.5 | 159.5 | O 175 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
WIN
L 74-81
−3.5
8
@
VILL
L 74-94
−2.5
11
@
DUQ
L 81-87
+6.5
15
vs
SHU
W 81-64
+11.5
20
vs
UNCG
W 101-94
−0.5
23
@
FUR
L 79-90
−2.5
28
@
UVA
L 69-94
+0.5
3
vs
GWEB
W 107-74
+18.5
12
vs
SCST
W 102-78
+5.5
14
@
WAKE
L 73-111
−19.5
16
@
ARK
L 80-108
−4.5
29
@
AUB
L 65-106
−15.5
1
vs
EKU
W 91-89
−2.5
3
vs
BELL
W 98-76
+14.5
8
@
JAX
W 77-51
+21.5
10
@
UNF
W 89-82
−4.5
15
@
FGCU
W 85-74
+12.5
17
@
STET
W 87-81
−4.5
21
vs
UNA
W 87-62
+12.5
24
@
WGA
L 66-74
−15.5
28
vs
CARK
L 90-100
−15.5
31
@
BELL
L 75-78
−8.5
5
vs
JAX
W 93-84
+0.5
7
vs
UNF
W 91-72
+3.5
11
vs
APSU
L 87-95
−10.5
14
vs
LIP
W 87-81
+2.5
18
@
UNA
W 85-78
−1.5
21
vs
WGA
W 91-84
−4.5
25
@
EKU
W 96-79
+14.5
28
@
CARK
L 79-84
−2.5
6
vs
WGA
W 71-63
−0.5
7
vs
APSU
W 90-83
+9.5
8
vs
CARK
W 98-93
+6.5
20
vs
PUR
L 71-104
−7.5
covered 15didn’t cover 19avg +0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
WIN
L 74-81
−8.5
8
@
VILL
L 74-94
+17.5
11
@
DUQ
L 81-87
+5.5
15
vs
SHU
W 81-64
−20.5
20
vs
UNCG
W 101-94
+44.5
23
@
FUR
L 79-90
+15.5
28
@
UVA
L 69-94
+2.5
3
vs
GWEB
W 107-74
+19.5
12
vs
SCST
W 102-78
+22.5
14
@
WAKE
L 73-111
+18.5
16
@
ARK
L 80-108
+18.5
29
@
AUB
L 65-106
−0.5
1
vs
EKU
W 91-89
+15.5
3
vs
BELL
W 98-76
+4.5
8
@
JAX
W 77-51
−26.5
10
@
UNF
W 89-82
−2.5
15
@
FGCU
W 85-74
−7.5
17
@
STET
W 87-81
+5.5
21
vs
UNA
W 87-62
−13.5
24
@
WGA
L 66-74
−22.5
28
vs
CARK
L 90-100
+31.5
31
@
BELL
L 75-78
−10.5
5
vs
JAX
W 93-84
+30.5
7
vs
UNF
W 91-72
−15.5
11
vs
APSU
L 87-95
+20.5
14
vs
LIP
W 87-81
+2.5
18
@
UNA
W 85-78
+6.5
21
vs
WGA
W 91-84
+13.5
25
@
EKU
W 96-79
+9.5
28
@
CARK
L 79-84
−0.5
6
vs
WGA
W 71-63
−30.5
7
vs
APSU
W 90-83
+11.5
8
vs
CARK
W 98-93
+33.5
20
vs
PUR
L 71-104
+15.5
over 22under 12avg +6.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Houston
37 games played
Straight up
30-7
81% wins
Against the spread
19-18
51% covers · avg +0.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-22
41% overs · avg −1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 75-57 | -36.5 | L −18.5 | 136.5 | U 132 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 65-48 | -26.5 | L −9.5 | 130.5 | U 113 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 78-45 | -30.5 | W +2.5 | 138.5 | U 123 |
| Nov 16 | vs | W 73-72 | -7.5 | L −6.5 | 140.5 | O 145 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 91-45 | -40.5 | W +5.5 | 134.5 | O 136 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 78-74 | -14.5 | L −10.5 | 140.5 | O 152 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 73-76 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 136.5 | O 149 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 66-56 | -11.5 | L −1.5 | 132.5 | U 122 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 82-67 | -12.5 | W +2.5 | 148.5 | O 149 |
| Dec 10 | vs | W 80-38 | -40.5 | W +1.5 | 137.5 | U 118 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 99-57 | -32.5 | W +9.5 | 138.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 94-85 | -5.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | O 179 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 69-60 | -25.5 | L −16.5 | 138.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 67-60 | -4.5 | W +2.5 | 135.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 6 | vs | W 69-65 | -7.5 | L −3.5 | 142.5 | U 134 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 77-55 | -2.5 | W +19.5 | 142.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 13 | vs | W 77-48 | -13.5 | W +15.5 | 127.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 18 | vs | W 103-73 | -18.5 | W +11.5 | 142.5 | O 176 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 86-90 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 141.5 | O 176 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 79-70 | -8.5 | W +0.5 | 139.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 76-54 | -13.5 | W +8.5 | 135.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 79-55 | -15.5 | W +8.5 | 146.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 77-66 | -1.5 | W +9.5 | 151.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 10 | @ | W 66-52 | -16.5 | L −2.5 | 142.5 | U 118 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 78-64 | -22.5 | L −8.5 | 144.5 | U 142 |
| Feb 16 | @ | L 67-70 | +2.5 | L −0.5 | 134.5 | O 137 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 66-73 | -6.5 | L −13.5 | 142.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 23 | @ | L 56-69 | -2.5 | L −15.5 | 138.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 102-62 | -20.5 | W +19.5 | 139.5 | O 164 |
| Mar 4 | vs | W 77-64 | -12.5 | W +0.5 | 143.5 | U 141 |
| Mar 7 | @ | W 82-75 | -13.5 | L −6.5 | 151.5 | O 157 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 73-66 | -9.5 | L −2.5 | 146.5 | U 139 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 69-47 | -5.5 | W +16.5 | 139.5 | U 116 |
| Mar 14 | vs | L 74-79 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 138.5 | O 153 |
| Mar 19 | vs | W 78-47 | -24.5 | W +6.5 | 137.5 | U 125 |
| Mar 21 | vs | W 88-57 | -10.5 | W +20.5 | 142.5 | O 145 |
| Mar 26 | vs | L 55-65 | -2.5 | L −12.5 | 141.5 | U 120 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
LEH
W 75-57
−18.5
8
vs
TOW
W 65-48
−9.5
12
vs
OAK
W 78-45
+2.5
16
vs
AUB
W 73-72
−6.5
20
vs
RID
W 91-45
+5.5
24
vs
SYR
W 78-74
−10.5
25
vs
TENN
L 73-76
−5.5
26
vs
ND
W 66-56
−1.5
6
vs
FSU
W 82-67
+2.5
10
vs
JKST
W 80-38
+1.5
13
vs
NOLA
W 99-57
+9.5
20
vs
ARK
W 94-85
+3.5
29
vs
MTSU
W 69-60
−16.5
3
@
CIN
W 67-60
+2.5
6
vs
TTU
W 69-65
−3.5
10
@
BAY
W 77-55
+19.5
13
vs
WVU
W 77-48
+15.5
18
vs
ASU
W 103-73
+11.5
24
@
TTU
L 86-90
−5.5
28
@
TCU
W 79-70
+0.5
31
vs
CIN
W 76-54
+8.5
4
vs
UCF
W 79-55
+8.5
7
@
BYU
W 77-66
+9.5
10
@
UTAH
W 66-52
−2.5
14
vs
KSU
W 78-64
−8.5
16
@
ISU
L 67-70
−0.5
21
vs
ARIZ
L 66-73
−13.5
23
@
KU
L 56-69
−15.5
28
vs
COLO
W 102-62
+19.5
4
vs
BAY
W 77-64
+0.5
7
@
OKST
W 82-75
−6.5
12
vs
BYU
W 73-66
−2.5
13
vs
KU
W 69-47
+16.5
14
vs
ARIZ
L 74-79
−3.5
19
vs
IDHO
W 78-47
+6.5
21
vs
TA&M
W 88-57
+20.5
26
vs
ILL
L 55-65
−12.5
covered 19didn’t cover 18avg +0.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
LEH
W 75-57
−4.5
8
vs
TOW
W 65-48
−17.5
12
vs
OAK
W 78-45
−15.5
16
vs
AUB
W 73-72
+4.5
20
vs
RID
W 91-45
+1.5
24
vs
SYR
W 78-74
+11.5
25
vs
TENN
L 73-76
+12.5
26
vs
ND
W 66-56
−10.5
6
vs
FSU
W 82-67
+0.5
10
vs
JKST
W 80-38
−19.5
13
vs
NOLA
W 99-57
+17.5
20
vs
ARK
W 94-85
+32.5
29
vs
MTSU
W 69-60
−9.5
3
@
CIN
W 67-60
−8.5
6
vs
TTU
W 69-65
−8.5
10
@
BAY
W 77-55
−10.5
13
vs
WVU
W 77-48
−2.5
18
vs
ASU
W 103-73
+33.5
24
@
TTU
L 86-90
+34.5
28
@
TCU
W 79-70
+9.5
31
vs
CIN
W 76-54
−5.5
4
vs
UCF
W 79-55
−12.5
7
@
BYU
W 77-66
−8.5
10
@
UTAH
W 66-52
−24.5
14
vs
KSU
W 78-64
−2.5
16
@
ISU
L 67-70
+2.5
21
vs
ARIZ
L 66-73
−3.5
23
@
KU
L 56-69
−13.5
28
vs
COLO
W 102-62
+24.5
4
vs
BAY
W 77-64
−2.5
7
@
OKST
W 82-75
+5.5
12
vs
BYU
W 73-66
−7.5
13
vs
KU
W 69-47
−23.5
14
vs
ARIZ
L 74-79
+14.5
19
vs
IDHO
W 78-47
−12.5
21
vs
TA&M
W 88-57
+2.5
26
vs
ILL
L 55-65
−21.5
over 15under 22avg −1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 84.4 #16 | Points per game | 76.9 #119 |
| 1.19 #25 | Points per possession | 1.18 #36 |
| 71.2 #65 | Pace (possessions) | 65.0 #346 |
| Shooting | ||
| 56.4 #15 | Effective FG% | 51.9 #150 |
| 35.7 #74 | 3-point % | 34.7 #134 |
| 46.5 #38 | 3-point attempt rate | 40.7 #153 |
| 35.4 #167 | Free throw rate | 26.3 #355 |
| Possessions | ||
| 14.8 #54 | Turnover rate | 12.8 #3 |
| 30.2 #190 | Offensive rebound rate | 35.7 #32 |
| 16.0 #49 | Assists per game | 14.6 #111 |
| Defense | ||
| 83.8 #355 | Points allowed | 62.3 #1 |
| 1.17 #346 | Points allowed per possession | 0.96 #5 |
| 54.6 #319 | Opponent effective FG% | 46.2 #12 |
| 36.5 #325 | Opponent 3-point % | 31.6 #49 |
| 15.1 #276 | Turnovers forced | 20.7 #14 |
| 66.4 #308 | Defensive rebound rate | 69.7 #173 |
| 6.0 #238 | Steals per game | 7.5 #75 |
| 2.9 #236 | Blocks per game | 3.8 #96 |
Queens University Royals
20-14 in 2025-26 overall · 16-5 in conference · Atlantic Sun Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Purdue71–104
- Wvs C Arkansas98–93
- Wvs Austin Peay90–83
- Wvs West Georgia71–63
- L@ C Arkansas79–84
A week or more of rest.
Houston
30-7 in 2025-26 overall · 16-5 in conference · Big 12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Illinois55–65
- Wvs Texas A&M88–57
- Wvs Idaho78–47
- Lvs Arizona74–79
- Wvs Kansas69–47
A week or more of rest.