Paycom Center · Neutral site · NCAA Tournament
Closing line
HOU -10.5✓ HOU covered by 20.5
Closing total142.5Over by 2.5
| This season | HOU | |
|---|---|---|
| 22-11 | Record | 29-6 |
| 19-14 | ATS | 18-17 |
| 18-15 | O/U | 14-21 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: TA&M 70–79 HOU · ✓ HOU (79%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| TA&M | 28 | 29 | 57 |
| HOU | 46 | 42 | 88 |
1st half: TA&M 28, HOU 46 (HOU by 18). The model had HOU by 5.3 and a total of 69.4 (actual 74).
Team stats
| TA&M | HOU | |
|---|---|---|
| 18-52 35% | Field goals | 30-68 44% |
| 6-24 25% | 3-pointers | 8-31 26% |
| 15-19 79% | Free throws | 20-25 80% |
| 29 9 off | Rebounds | 46 19 off |
| 9 | Assists | 14 |
| 4 | Steals | 4 |
| 0 | Blocks | 7 |
| 11 | Turnovers | 7 |
| 21 | Fouls | 16 |
| 20 | Points in paint | 32 |
| 7 | Fast-break points | 7 |
Players
| TA&M | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rylan Griffen G | 27 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 3-8 | 0-2 |
| Rashaun Agee F | 23 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 3-7 | 0-3 |
| Ruben Dominguez G | 23 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1-5 | 1-5 |
| Pop Isaacs G | 22 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 1-5 | 1-3 |
| Marcus Hill G | 18 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0-5 | 0-1 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Zach Clemence F | 25 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 2-8 | 2-6 |
| Josh Holloway G | 22 | 12 | 4 | 3 | 4-6 | 2-2 |
| Ali Dibba G | 17 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| Jamie Vinson F | 11 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 2-4 | 0-1 |
| Jacari Lane G | 9 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| Chris McDermott F | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Mackenzie Mgbako, Noah Shelby, Jeremiah Green, Federiko Federiko
| HOU | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Milos Uzan G | 33 | 15 | 4 | 4 | 6-17 | 3-10 |
| Kingston Flemings G | 31 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 4-10 | 0-1 |
| Chris Cenac Jr. F | 25 | 17 | 9 | 0 | 5-9 | 0-1 |
| Emanuel Sharp G | 25 | 18 | 4 | 0 | 5-11 | 2-8 |
| Joseph Tugler F | 25 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Mercy Miller G | 22 | 12 | 3 | 3 | 4-8 | 1-5 |
| Chase McCarty F | 13 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 2-5 | 2-5 |
| Kalifa Sakho F | 13 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| Ramon Walker Jr. G | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Isiah Harwell G | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| Jacob McFarland C | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Cedric Lath C | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Bryce Jackson, Kordel Jefferson
Loading the game…
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenHOU -9.5
1 → HOU
CloseHOU -10.5
1 pt toward HOU
Total
Open144.5
▼ 2
Close142.5
Down 2 since the open
Moneyline
TA&M +390 · HOU -520
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened HOU -9.5 · closed HOU -10.5 · moved 1 toward HOUmodel HOU -9
model HOU -9
Opened 144.5 · closed 142.5 · moved 2 downmodel 148.5
model 148.5
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | Result | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | HOU -10.5 | HOU -9.2 | TA&M +1.3 | L HOU covered |
| Total | 142.5 | 148.4 | Over 5.9 | W Over |
| Projected score | — | TA&M 69.6 · HOU 78.8 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | HOU -5.3 | HOU -18.0 |
| 1H total | 69.4 | 74 |
| 1H projected score | TA&M 32 · HOU 37.4 | TA&M 28 · HOU 46 |
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% | |
| 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
TA&M 0–2 HOUHOU leads · 2 games since 2021-22 · HOU has won the last 2 meetings · TA&M 2-0 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2023-24 | TA&M 95 vs HOU 100 | HOU -8.5 | TA&M W |
| Dec 16, 2023-24 | TA&M 66 vs HOU 70 | HOU -7.5 | TA&M W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Texas A&M
33 games played
Straight up
22-11
67% wins
Against the spread
19-14
58% covers · avg +1.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
18-15
55% overs · avg +1.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 98-68 | -21.5 | W +8.5 | 153.5 | O 166 |
| Nov 6 | vs | W 104-70 | -29.5 | W +4.5 | 161.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 9 | @ | L 63-87 | -2.5 | L −26.5 | 174.5 | U 150 |
| Nov 14 | vs | L 74-86 | -10.5 | L −22.5 | 172.5 | U 160 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 86-81 | -17.5 | L −12.5 | 164.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 109-68 | -23.5 | W +17.5 | 162.5 | O 177 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 120-84 | -42.5 | L −6.5 | 154.5 | O 204 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 95-59 | +1.5 | W +37.5 | 174.5 | U 154 |
| Dec 2 | @ | W 81-73 | -3.5 | W +4.5 | 152.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 7 | vs | L 80-93 | -1.5 | L −14.5 | 164.5 | O 173 |
| Dec 14 | vs | W 112-75 | -26.5 | W +10.5 | 147.5 | O 187 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 118-77 | -28.5 | W +12.5 | 166.5 | O 195 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 111-82 | -29.5 | L −0.5 | 177.5 | O 193 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 75-72 | -5.5 | L −2.5 | 168.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 6 | @ | W 90-88 | +6.5 | W +8.5 | 168.5 | O 178 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 83-76 | -4.5 | W +2.5 | 165.5 | U 159 |
| Jan 13 | @ | L 82-87 | +11.5 | W +6.5 | 159.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 74-70 | +4.5 | W +8.5 | 166.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 88-68 | -8.5 | W +11.5 | 163.5 | U 156 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 92-69 | -10.5 | W +12.5 | 155.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 92-77 | +4.5 | W +19.5 | 173.5 | U 169 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 97-100 | +8.5 | W +5.5 | 180.5 | O 197 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 67-86 | +5.5 | L −13.5 | 167.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 85-86 | -7.5 | L −8.5 | 160.5 | O 171 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 69-82 | +7.5 | L −5.5 | 165.5 | U 151 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 80-77 | -9.5 | L −6.5 | 157.5 | U 157 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 75-71 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 165.5 | U 146 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 84-99 | +7.5 | L −7.5 | 170.5 | O 183 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 70-76 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 159.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 96-85 | -1.5 | W +9.5 | 162.5 | O 181 |
| Mar 7 | @ | W 94-91 | -2.5 | W +0.5 | 161.5 | O 185 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 63-83 | -2.5 | L −22.5 | 162.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 19 | vs | W 63-50 | +2.5 | W +15.5 | 149.5 | U 113 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
NWST
W 98-68
+8.5
6
vs
TXSO
W 104-70
+4.5
9
@
OKST
L 63-87
−26.5
14
vs
UCF
L 74-86
−22.5
18
vs
MONT
W 86-81
−12.5
21
vs
MAN
W 109-68
+17.5
25
vs
MVSU
W 120-84
−6.5
28
vs
FSU
W 95-59
+37.5
2
@
PITT
W 81-73
+4.5
7
vs
SMU
L 80-93
−14.5
14
vs
JAX
W 112-75
+10.5
21
vs
ETAM
W 118-77
+12.5
29
vs
PV
W 111-82
−0.5
3
vs
LSU
W 75-72
−2.5
6
@
AUB
W 90-88
+8.5
10
vs
OU
W 83-76
+2.5
13
@
TENN
L 82-87
+6.5
17
@
TEX
W 74-70
+8.5
21
vs
MSST
W 88-68
+11.5
24
vs
SC
W 92-69
+12.5
31
@
UGA
W 92-77
+19.5
4
@
ALA
L 97-100
+5.5
7
vs
FLA
L 67-86
−13.5
11
vs
MIZ
L 85-86
−8.5
14
@
VAN
L 69-82
−5.5
18
vs
MISS
W 80-77
−6.5
21
@
OU
W 75-71
+2.5
25
@
ARK
L 84-99
−7.5
28
vs
TEX
L 70-76
−8.5
3
vs
UK
W 96-85
+9.5
7
@
LSU
W 94-91
+0.5
12
vs
OU
L 63-83
−22.5
19
vs
SMC
W 63-50
+15.5
covered 19didn’t cover 14avg +1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
NWST
W 98-68
+12.5
6
vs
TXSO
W 104-70
+12.5
9
@
OKST
L 63-87
−24.5
14
vs
UCF
L 74-86
−12.5
18
vs
MONT
W 86-81
+2.5
21
vs
MAN
W 109-68
+14.5
25
vs
MVSU
W 120-84
+49.5
28
vs
FSU
W 95-59
−20.5
2
@
PITT
W 81-73
+1.5
7
vs
SMU
L 80-93
+8.5
14
vs
JAX
W 112-75
+39.5
21
vs
ETAM
W 118-77
+28.5
29
vs
PV
W 111-82
+15.5
3
vs
LSU
W 75-72
−21.5
6
@
AUB
W 90-88
+9.5
10
vs
OU
W 83-76
−6.5
13
@
TENN
L 82-87
+9.5
17
@
TEX
W 74-70
−22.5
21
vs
MSST
W 88-68
−7.5
24
vs
SC
W 92-69
+5.5
31
@
UGA
W 92-77
−4.5
4
@
ALA
L 97-100
+16.5
7
vs
FLA
L 67-86
−14.5
11
vs
MIZ
L 85-86
+10.5
14
@
VAN
L 69-82
−14.5
18
vs
MISS
W 80-77
−0.5
21
@
OU
W 75-71
−19.5
25
@
ARK
L 84-99
+12.5
28
vs
TEX
L 70-76
−13.5
3
vs
UK
W 96-85
+18.5
7
@
LSU
W 94-91
+23.5
12
vs
OU
L 63-83
−16.5
19
vs
SMC
W 63-50
−36.5
over 18under 15avg +1.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Houston
35 games played
Straight up
29-6
83% wins
Against the spread
18-17
51% covers · avg +0.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-21
40% overs · avg −0.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 75-57 | -36.5 | L −18.5 | 136.5 | U 132 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 65-48 | -26.5 | L −9.5 | 130.5 | U 113 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 78-45 | -30.5 | W +2.5 | 138.5 | U 123 |
| Nov 16 | vs | W 73-72 | -7.5 | L −6.5 | 140.5 | O 145 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 91-45 | -40.5 | W +5.5 | 134.5 | O 136 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 78-74 | -14.5 | L −10.5 | 140.5 | O 152 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 73-76 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 136.5 | O 149 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 66-56 | -11.5 | L −1.5 | 132.5 | U 122 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 82-67 | -12.5 | W +2.5 | 148.5 | O 149 |
| Dec 10 | vs | W 80-38 | -40.5 | W +1.5 | 137.5 | U 118 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 99-57 | -32.5 | W +9.5 | 138.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 94-85 | -5.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | O 179 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 69-60 | -25.5 | L −16.5 | 138.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 67-60 | -4.5 | W +2.5 | 135.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 6 | vs | W 69-65 | -7.5 | L −3.5 | 142.5 | U 134 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 77-55 | -2.5 | W +19.5 | 142.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 13 | vs | W 77-48 | -13.5 | W +15.5 | 127.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 18 | vs | W 103-73 | -18.5 | W +11.5 | 142.5 | O 176 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 86-90 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 141.5 | O 176 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 79-70 | -8.5 | W +0.5 | 139.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 76-54 | -13.5 | W +8.5 | 135.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 79-55 | -15.5 | W +8.5 | 146.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 77-66 | -1.5 | W +9.5 | 151.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 10 | @ | W 66-52 | -16.5 | L −2.5 | 142.5 | U 118 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 78-64 | -22.5 | L −8.5 | 144.5 | U 142 |
| Feb 16 | @ | L 67-70 | +2.5 | L −0.5 | 134.5 | O 137 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 66-73 | -6.5 | L −13.5 | 142.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 23 | @ | L 56-69 | -2.5 | L −15.5 | 138.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 102-62 | -20.5 | W +19.5 | 139.5 | O 164 |
| Mar 4 | vs | W 77-64 | -12.5 | W +0.5 | 143.5 | U 141 |
| Mar 7 | @ | W 82-75 | -13.5 | L −6.5 | 151.5 | O 157 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 73-66 | -9.5 | L −2.5 | 146.5 | U 139 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 69-47 | -5.5 | W +16.5 | 139.5 | U 116 |
| Mar 14 | vs | L 74-79 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 138.5 | O 153 |
| Mar 19 | vs | W 78-47 | -24.5 | W +6.5 | 137.5 | U 125 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
LEH
W 75-57
−18.5
8
vs
TOW
W 65-48
−9.5
12
vs
OAK
W 78-45
+2.5
16
vs
AUB
W 73-72
−6.5
20
vs
RID
W 91-45
+5.5
24
vs
SYR
W 78-74
−10.5
25
vs
TENN
L 73-76
−5.5
26
vs
ND
W 66-56
−1.5
6
vs
FSU
W 82-67
+2.5
10
vs
JKST
W 80-38
+1.5
13
vs
NOLA
W 99-57
+9.5
20
vs
ARK
W 94-85
+3.5
29
vs
MTSU
W 69-60
−16.5
3
@
CIN
W 67-60
+2.5
6
vs
TTU
W 69-65
−3.5
10
@
BAY
W 77-55
+19.5
13
vs
WVU
W 77-48
+15.5
18
vs
ASU
W 103-73
+11.5
24
@
TTU
L 86-90
−5.5
28
@
TCU
W 79-70
+0.5
31
vs
CIN
W 76-54
+8.5
4
vs
UCF
W 79-55
+8.5
7
@
BYU
W 77-66
+9.5
10
@
UTAH
W 66-52
−2.5
14
vs
KSU
W 78-64
−8.5
16
@
ISU
L 67-70
−0.5
21
vs
ARIZ
L 66-73
−13.5
23
@
KU
L 56-69
−15.5
28
vs
COLO
W 102-62
+19.5
4
vs
BAY
W 77-64
+0.5
7
@
OKST
W 82-75
−6.5
12
vs
BYU
W 73-66
−2.5
13
vs
KU
W 69-47
+16.5
14
vs
ARIZ
L 74-79
−3.5
19
vs
IDHO
W 78-47
+6.5
covered 18didn’t cover 17avg +0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
LEH
W 75-57
−4.5
8
vs
TOW
W 65-48
−17.5
12
vs
OAK
W 78-45
−15.5
16
vs
AUB
W 73-72
+4.5
20
vs
RID
W 91-45
+1.5
24
vs
SYR
W 78-74
+11.5
25
vs
TENN
L 73-76
+12.5
26
vs
ND
W 66-56
−10.5
6
vs
FSU
W 82-67
+0.5
10
vs
JKST
W 80-38
−19.5
13
vs
NOLA
W 99-57
+17.5
20
vs
ARK
W 94-85
+32.5
29
vs
MTSU
W 69-60
−9.5
3
@
CIN
W 67-60
−8.5
6
vs
TTU
W 69-65
−8.5
10
@
BAY
W 77-55
−10.5
13
vs
WVU
W 77-48
−2.5
18
vs
ASU
W 103-73
+33.5
24
@
TTU
L 86-90
+34.5
28
@
TCU
W 79-70
+9.5
31
vs
CIN
W 76-54
−5.5
4
vs
UCF
W 79-55
−12.5
7
@
BYU
W 77-66
−8.5
10
@
UTAH
W 66-52
−24.5
14
vs
KSU
W 78-64
−2.5
16
@
ISU
L 67-70
+2.5
21
vs
ARIZ
L 66-73
−3.5
23
@
KU
L 56-69
−13.5
28
vs
COLO
W 102-62
+24.5
4
vs
BAY
W 77-64
−2.5
7
@
OKST
W 82-75
+5.5
12
vs
BYU
W 73-66
−7.5
13
vs
KU
W 69-47
−23.5
14
vs
ARIZ
L 74-79
+14.5
19
vs
IDHO
W 78-47
−12.5
over 14under 21avg −0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Texas A&M
22-11 overall · 11-8 in conference · Southeastern Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs Saint Mary's63–50
- Lvs Oklahoma63–83
- W@ LSU94–91
- Wvs Kentucky96–85
- Lvs Texas70–76
2 days since their last game.
Houston
29-6 overall · 16-5 in conference · Big 12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs Idaho78–47
- Lvs Arizona74–79
- Wvs Kansas69–47
- Wvs BYU73–66
- W@ Oklahoma St82–75
2 days since their last game.