Galen Center · at USC · Conference game
Closing line
USC -11.5✓ RUTG covered by 8.5
Closing total146.5Over by 6.5
| This season | USC | |
|---|---|---|
| 9-12 | Record | 14-6 |
| 9-12 | ATS | 11-9 |
| 11-10 | O/U | 10-10 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: RUTG 72–83 USC · ✓ USC (83%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RUTG | 30 | 45 | 75 |
| USC | 40 | 38 | 78 |
1st half: RUTG 30, USC 40 (USC by 10). The model had USC by 6.3 and a total of 72.3 (actual 70).
Team stats
| RUTG | USC | |
|---|---|---|
| 29-74 39% | Field goals | 26-51 51% |
| 8-24 33% | 3-pointers | 4-12 33% |
| 9-12 75% | Free throws | 22-30 73% |
| 33 17 off | Rebounds | 40 12 off |
| 14 | Assists | 16 |
| 7 | Steals | 6 |
| 4 | Blocks | 4 |
| 8 | Turnovers | 17 |
| 21 | Fouls | 13 |
| 28 | Points in paint | 36 |
| 12 | Fast-break points | 8 |
Players
| RUTG | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dylan Grant F | 32 | 14 | 10 | 2 | 6-13 | 1-4 |
| Jamichael Davis G | 21 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1-5 | 0-1 |
| Darren Buchanan Jr. G | 20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0-5 | 0-0 |
| Kaden Powers G | 16 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 4-8 | 1-3 |
| Emmanuel Ogbole C | 16 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Tariq Francis G | 27 | 26 | 2 | 5 | 10-19 | 1-3 |
| Harun Zrno G | 26 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 3-10 | 3-8 |
| Lino Mark G | 20 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2-7 | 2-4 |
| Bryce Ruglass Dortch F | 14 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| Chris Nwuli F | 8 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2-3 | 0-1 |
Did not play: Denis Badalau, Baye Fall, Max Fradkin, Gevonte Ware, Dorian Jones
| USC | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chad Baker-Mazara G | 38 | 17 | 5 | 3 | 7-15 | 2-6 |
| Kam Woods G | 38 | 8 | 9 | 4 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| Jacob Cofie F | 37 | 15 | 10 | 3 | 6-11 | 0-2 |
| Ezra Ausar F | 34 | 21 | 7 | 2 | 6-8 | 0-0 |
| Alijah Arenas G | 19 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 3-9 | 2-4 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Jerry Easter II G | 20 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 3-5 | 0-0 |
| Gabe Dynes C | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Terrance Williams II F | 6 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Ryan Cornish G | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Jaden Brownell, Patrick O'Brien, Amarion Dickerson, Brit Burden, Jonah Goorin, Jordan Marsh, EJ Neal Jr., Rodney Rice
Loading the game…
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edgeResult
Spread
MarketUSC -11.5
ModelUSC -10.8
Model edgeRUTG +0.7
W RUTG covered
Total
Market146.5
Model154.6
Model edgeOver 8.1
W Over
Projected score
RUTG 71.9 · USC 82.7
RUTG 75 · USC 78
Win probability
USC 83%
1st half
Spread
USC -6.3
USC -10.0
Total
72.3
70 points
Projected score
RUTG 33 · USC 39.3
RUTG 30 · USC 40
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenUSC -13.5
2 → RUTG
CloseUSC -11.5
2 pts toward RUTG
Total
Open145.5
▲ 1
Close146.5
Up 1 since the open
Moneyline
RUTG +625 · USC -950
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened USC -13.5 · closed USC -11.5 · moved 2 toward RUTGmodel USC -11
model USC -11
Opened 145.5 · closed 146.5 · moved 1 upmodel 154.5
model 154.5
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% | |
| 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | 3-7 30% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
RUTG 1–1 USCSeries tied · 2 games since 2021-22 · RUTG 1-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2024-25 | USC 97 vs RUTG 89 | RUTG +1.5 | USC W |
| Feb 23, 2024-25 | USC 85 @ RUTG 95 | RUTG -3.5 | RUTG W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Rutgers
21 games played
Straight up
9-12
43% wins
Against the spread
9-12
43% covers · avg −2.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
11-10
52% overs · avg +2.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5 | vs | W 81-53 | -18.5 | W +9.5 | 139.5 | U 134 |
| Nov 10 | vs | W 72-60 | -18.5 | L −6.5 | 130.5 | O 132 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 84-72 | -18.5 | L −6.5 | 136.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 80-71 | -16.5 | L −7.5 | 143.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 54-67 | -15.5 | L −28.5 | 137.5 | U 121 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 60-85 | +14.5 | L −10.5 | 141.5 | O 145 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 63-68 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 140.5 | U 131 |
| Nov 27 | vs | W 80-65 | +4.5 | W +19.5 | 153.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 2 | vs | L 65-81 | +13.5 | L −2.5 | 146.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 60-101 | +25.5 | L −15.5 | 153.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 59-81 | +13.5 | L −8.5 | 136.5 | O 140 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 70-69 | -11.5 | L −10.5 | 150.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 65-50 | -20.5 | L −5.5 | 135.5 | U 115 |
| Jan 2 | vs | L 73-80 | +9.5 | W +2.5 | 151.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 5 | vs | W 88-85 | +4.5 | W +7.5 | 139.5 | O 173 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 55-81 | +22.5 | L −3.5 | 149.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 11 | vs | W 77-75 | +4.5 | W +6.5 | 144.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 87-96 | +15.5 | W +6.5 | 149.5 | O 183 |
| Jan 20 | @ | L 62-68 | +17.5 | W +11.5 | 140.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 23 | vs | L 59-82 | +7.5 | L −15.5 | 147.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 27 | vs | L 79-88 | +14.5 | W +5.5 | 138.5 | O 167 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
5
vs
RID
W 81-53
+9.5
10
vs
ME
W 72-60
−6.5
14
vs
LEH
W 84-72
−6.5
18
vs
AMER
W 80-71
−7.5
21
vs
CCSU
L 54-67
−28.5
24
vs
TENN
L 60-85
−10.5
25
vs
ND
L 63-68
+1.5
27
vs
UNLV
W 80-65
+19.5
2
vs
PUR
L 65-81
−2.5
6
@
MICH
L 60-101
−15.5
13
@
HALL
L 59-81
−8.5
20
vs
PENN
W 70-69
−10.5
29
vs
DSU
W 65-50
−5.5
2
vs
OSU
L 73-80
+2.5
5
vs
ORE
W 88-85
+7.5
8
@
ILL
L 55-81
−3.5
11
vs
NU
W 77-75
+6.5
17
@
WIS
L 87-96
+6.5
20
@
IOWA
L 62-68
+11.5
23
vs
IU
L 59-82
−15.5
27
vs
MSU
L 79-88
+5.5
covered 9didn’t cover 12avg −2.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
5
vs
RID
W 81-53
−5.5
10
vs
ME
W 72-60
+1.5
14
vs
LEH
W 84-72
+19.5
18
vs
AMER
W 80-71
+7.5
21
vs
CCSU
L 54-67
−16.5
24
vs
TENN
L 60-85
+3.5
25
vs
ND
L 63-68
−9.5
27
vs
UNLV
W 80-65
−8.5
2
vs
PUR
L 65-81
−0.5
6
@
MICH
L 60-101
+7.5
13
@
HALL
L 59-81
+3.5
20
vs
PENN
W 70-69
−11.5
29
vs
DSU
W 65-50
−20.5
2
vs
OSU
L 73-80
+1.5
5
vs
ORE
W 88-85
+33.5
8
@
ILL
L 55-81
−13.5
11
vs
NU
W 77-75
+7.5
17
@
WIS
L 87-96
+33.5
20
@
IOWA
L 62-68
−10.5
23
vs
IU
L 59-82
−6.5
27
vs
MSU
L 79-88
+28.5
over 11under 10avg +2.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
USC
20 games played
Straight up
14-6
70% wins
Against the spread
11-9
55% covers · avg −1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
10-10
50% overs · avg +1.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 94-64 | -24.5 | W +5.5 | 163.5 | U 158 |
| Nov 9 | vs | W 114-83 | -28.5 | W +2.5 | 155.5 | O 197 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 87-67 | -15.5 | W +4.5 | 155.5 | U 154 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 107-106 | -18.5 | L −17.5 | 159.5 | O 213 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 70-67 | -3.5 | L −0.5 | 155.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 83-81 | -6.5 | L −4.5 | 145.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 88-75 | -4.5 | W +8.5 | 161.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 2 | @ | W 82-77 | -2.5 | W +2.5 | 154.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 76-84 | -4.5 | L −12.5 | 154.5 | O 160 |
| Dec 9 | @ | W 94-81 | -14.5 | L −1.5 | 158.5 | O 175 |
| Dec 14 | vs | W 68-61 | -12.5 | L −5.5 | 156.5 | U 129 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 97-70 | -25.5 | W +1.5 | 157.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 2 | @ | L 66-96 | +22.5 | L −7.5 | 173.5 | U 162 |
| Jan 5 | @ | L 51-80 | +11.5 | L −17.5 | 151.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 9 | @ | W 70-69 | +3.5 | W +4.5 | 147.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 13 | vs | W 88-71 | -9.5 | W +7.5 | 150.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 64-69 | +9.5 | W +4.5 | 155.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 21 | vs | L 68-74 | -6.5 | L −12.5 | 149.5 | U 142 |
| Jan 25 | @ | W 73-71 | +7.5 | W +9.5 | 158.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 72-73 | +9.5 | W +8.5 | 141.5 | O 145 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
CP
W 94-64
+5.5
9
vs
MAN
W 114-83
+2.5
14
vs
ILST
W 87-67
+4.5
20
vs
TROY
W 107-106
−17.5
24
vs
BOIS
W 70-67
−0.5
25
vs
HALL
W 83-81
−4.5
26
vs
ASU
W 88-75
+8.5
2
@
ORE
W 82-77
+2.5
6
vs
WASH
L 76-84
−12.5
9
@
USD
W 94-81
−1.5
14
vs
WSU
W 68-61
−5.5
17
vs
UTSA
W 97-70
+1.5
2
@
MICH
L 66-96
−7.5
5
@
MSU
L 51-80
−17.5
9
@
MINN
W 70-69
+4.5
13
vs
MD
W 88-71
+7.5
17
vs
PUR
L 64-69
+4.5
21
vs
NU
L 68-74
−12.5
25
@
WIS
W 73-71
+9.5
28
@
IOWA
L 72-73
+8.5
covered 11didn’t cover 9avg −1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
CP
W 94-64
−5.5
9
vs
MAN
W 114-83
+41.5
14
vs
ILST
W 87-67
−1.5
20
vs
TROY
W 107-106
+53.5
24
vs
BOIS
W 70-67
−18.5
25
vs
HALL
W 83-81
+18.5
26
vs
ASU
W 88-75
+1.5
2
@
ORE
W 82-77
+4.5
6
vs
WASH
L 76-84
+5.5
9
@
USD
W 94-81
+16.5
14
vs
WSU
W 68-61
−27.5
17
vs
UTSA
W 97-70
+9.5
2
@
MICH
L 66-96
−11.5
5
@
MSU
L 51-80
−20.5
9
@
MINN
W 70-69
−8.5
13
vs
MD
W 88-71
+8.5
17
vs
PUR
L 64-69
−22.5
21
vs
NU
L 68-74
−7.5
25
@
WIS
W 73-71
−14.5
28
@
IOWA
L 72-73
+3.5
over 10under 10avg +1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Rutgers
9-12 overall · 2-8 in conference · Big Ten Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Michigan St79–88
- Lvs Indiana59–82
- L@ Iowa62–68
- L@ Wisconsin87–96
- Wvs Northwestern77–75
4 days since their last game.
USC
14-6 overall · 4-6 in conference · Big Ten Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Iowa72–73
- W@ Wisconsin73–71
- Lvs Northwestern68–74
- Lvs Purdue64–69
- Wvs Maryland88–71
3 days since their last game.