No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
Conference
3-12 · #357
3-16 · #353
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.6
Spread edge
—
model NCCU -1.5
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.2
Projected
40–31
✓ DUKE won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 61.6
Projected
27–35
✓ HOU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.8
Projected
39–36
✗ TTU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.0
Projected
30–36
✓ CLEM won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.0
Projected
33–38
✓ WIN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.9
Projected
32–35
✗ HALL lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.6
Projected
35–39
✗ BTLR lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.8
Projected
38–36
✓ NCSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.9
Projected
32–37
✓ TOL won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.9
Projected
37–40
✗ W&M lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.1
Projected
34–37
✗ ELON lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.4
Projected
36–35
✗ UNCG lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.1
Projected
35–36
✓ INST won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.2
Projected
34–35
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.2
Projected
34–37
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.7
Projected
34–36
✗ XAV lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.4
Projected
35–36
✗ PFW lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.5
Projected
31–35
✗ LEM lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.2
Projected
33–34
✓ WAG won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.9
Projected
37–34
✓ LSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 83.3
Projected
41–43
✗ UGA lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.8
Projected
37–31
✗ UVA lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.5
Projected
43–34
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.7
Projected
39–33
✓ UNC won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.7
Projected
36–41
✗ LOU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.5
Projected
36–34
✗ COLG lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.2
Projected
32–36
✓ AMER won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.5
Projected
31–38
✗ GW lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.4
Projected
38–39
✓ WIS won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.2
Projected
34–34
✗ BU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.8
Projected
35–35
✓ PRES won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.1
Projected
33–30
✗ MERC lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.0
Projected
37–37
✗ BUF lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.6
Projected
34–33
✓ LIU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.5
Projected
30–33
✓ UML won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.1
Projected
38–37
✗ COFC lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.8
Projected
31–35
✓ DREX won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 61.3
Projected
29–33
✓ TOW won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.0
Projected
33–33
✓ HOF won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.6
Projected
31–42
✓ MER won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.5
Projected
34–35
✓ TXST won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.7
Projected
39–37
✗ TEX lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 78.3
Projected
40–38
✗ QUC lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.6
Projected
35–35
✓ UNA won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 78.8
Projected
42–37
✗ LIP lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.4
Projected
34–33
✓ JOES won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.8
Projected
41–35
✓ HPU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.3
Projected
34–29
✓ FRES won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.6
Projected
32–39
✓ SDST won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.0
Projected
37–40
✗ ARST lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.5
Projected
35–35
✓ USM won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.8
Projected
35–37
✗ WEB lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.0
Projected
34–34
✓ FGCU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.0
Projected
32–32
✓ CBU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.9
Projected
31–33
✓ MOST won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.1
Projected
32–42
✓ M-OH won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.8
Projected
37–36
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.5
Projected
35–38
✓ MIZ won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.3
Projected
36–35
✗ LIN lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 59.4
Projected
26–33
✓ UNI won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.5
Projected
33–35
✓ HOW won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.0
Projected
34–34
✓ BAY won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.0
Projected
38–33
✓ UAPB won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.5
Projected
35–34
✓ GRAM won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.3
Projected
33–38
✗ MIA lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.7
Projected
31–37
✓ NAVY won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.1
Projected
37–38
✓ DEN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.9
Projected
31–33
✓ BRY won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.4
Projected
37–32
✓ HAW won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.6
Projected
35–34
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.9
Projected
37–40
✓ UNCO won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.3
Projected
33–36
✓ ACU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.9
Projected
34–35
✗ MTSU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.9
Projected
34–34
✗ LR lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.0
Projected
36–37
✓ KU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.7
Projected
33–34
✗ RICH lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.7
Projected
37–36
✓ MORG won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.1
Projected
29–34
✗ AMCC lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.3
Projected
30–36
✗ UVM lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.3
Projected
31–36
✗ TROY lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.2
Projected
35–38
✓ CARK won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.0
Projected
37–33
✓ APSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.7
Projected
34–29
✓ UTM won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.9
Projected
34–32
✓ SEMO won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.4
Projected
37–34
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 60.0
Projected
30–30
✗ UMES lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.3
Projected
34–35
✓ UCLA won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.0
Projected
38–35
✓ UCD won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.6
Projected
33–33
✓ RGV won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.9
Projected
33–34
✓ PRST won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.7
Projected
35–38
✓ TAR won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.9
Projected
37–38
✓ KENN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.2
Projected
38–37
✓ TXSO won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.3
Projected
31–34
✓ AAMU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.1
Projected
32–40
✓ VAN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.2
Projected
35–35
✗ DRKE lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.1
Projected
34–38
✓ WSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.7
Projected
36–36
✗ USD lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.0
Projected
33–36
✓ SYR won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.6
Projected
33–34
✗ BRWN lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.2
Projected
32–36
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.0
Projected
40–36
✓ NDSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.5
Projected
34–37
✓ MASS won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 80.5
Projected
39–42
✗ COR lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.5
Projected
29–35
✓ SFA won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.7
Projected
35–38
✓ NOLA won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.7
Projected
35–34
✓ NICH won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 78.8
Projected
40–39
✓ OKST won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.7
Projected
36–37
✓ FSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.6
Projected
35–33
✗ GMU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.6
Projected
37–39
✗ ARK lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.0
Projected
34–35
✓ SIU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.3
Projected
33–39
✓ USC won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.7
Projected
37–33
✓ BGSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.6
Projected
31–37
✗ YALE lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.5
Projected
32–31
✓ NHVN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.5
Projected
35–34
✗ UMBC lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.7
Projected
36–31
✓ MCN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.0
Projected
36–32
✓ CONN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.2
Projected
38–40
✓ BEL won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.6
Projected
34–33
✗ UAB lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.5
Projected
35–35
✗ NU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.2
Projected
38–39
✗ UCR lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.6
Projected
38–36
✗ UCSD lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.0
Projected
31–35
✓ USA won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.5
Projected
35–33
✓ IDHO won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.9
Projected
40–36
✗ USF lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 62.2
Projected
31–31
✗ SIUE lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.0
Projected
36–37
✓ TENN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.1
Projected
38–32
✓ SCU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.2
Projected
35–39
✓ UCSB won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 62.6
Projected
30–33
✓ UTEP won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.0
Projected
33–34
✓ WYO won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.0
Projected
39–30
✓ UNM won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.6
Projected
31–34
✓ SF won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.7
Projected
38–36
✗ MONT lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.1
Projected
31–35
✓ SHSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.7
Projected
31–38
✗ GONZ lost
| Status | Matchup | Spread | Total | Model line | Spread edge | Model total | Total edge | Win prob | Model | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | NCCU -1.5 | — | 69.6 | — | 57% NCCU | › | |||
| Half final | 19-1 · #3 16-6 · #68 |
— | — | DUKE -8.9 | — | 71.2 | — | 83% DUKE | › | |
| Half final | 11-10 · #30 18-2 · #2 |
— | — | HOU -8.0 | — | 61.6 | — | 81% HOU | › | |
| Half final | 16-4 · #12 16-4 · #39 |
— | — | TTU -3.3 | — | 74.8 | — | 64% TTU | › | |
| Half final | 9-12 · #74 17-4 · #35 |
— | — | CLEM -6.1 | — | 65.0 | — | 75% CLEM | › | |
| Half final | 7-12 · #271 12-8 · #205 |
— | — | WIN -4.9 | — | 71.0 | — | 70% WIN | › | |
| Half final | 8-14 · #42 15-6 · #67 |
— | — | HALL -3.6 | — | 66.9 | — | 65% HALL | › | |
| Half final | 11-10 · #64 13-8 · #72 |
— | — | BTLR -3.6 | — | 73.6 | — | 65% BTLR | › | |
| Half final | 15-6 · #48 11-10 · #89 |
— | — | NCSU -2.4 | — | 73.8 | — | 60% NCSU | › | |
| Half final | 5-13 · #181 9-10 · #157 |
— | — | TOL -5.4 | — | 68.9 | — | 72% TOL | › | |
| Half final | 7-13 · #243 12-7 · #217 |
— | — | W&M -3.6 | — | 76.9 | — | 65% W&M | › | |
| Half final | 11-9 · #191 11-9 · #232 |
— | — | ELON -3.2 | — | 71.1 | — | 64% ELON | › | |
| Half final | 6-14 · #284 4-15 · #339 |
— | — | UNCG -1.3 | — | 70.4 | — | 56% UNCG | › | |
| Half final | 9-11 · #176 7-13 · #207 |
— | — | INST -0.8 | — | 70.1 | — | 54% INST | › | |
| Half final | 6-14 · #317 7-13 · #288 |
— | — | ARMY -1.0 | — | 69.2 | — | 54% ARMY | › | |
| Half final | 14-5 · #75 16-3 · #58 |
— | — | USU -3.6 | — | 71.2 | — | 65% USU | › | |
| Half final | 12-9 · #66 11-10 · #49 |
— | — | XAV -1.9 | — | 69.7 | — | 58% XAV | › | |
| Half final | 12-9 · #168 10-9 · #249 |
— | — | PFW -1.4 | — | 70.4 | — | 56% PFW | › | |
| Half final | 6-14 · #349 10-11 · #332 |
— | — | LEM -3.6 | — | 65.5 | — | 65% LEM | › | |
| Half final | 4-15 · #356 3-13 · #354 |
— | — | WAG -0.9 | — | 66.2 | — | 54% WAG | › | |
| Half final | 13-8 · #51 11-10 · #79 |
— | — | LSU -2.4 | — | 70.9 | — | 60% LSU | › | |
| Half final | 16-4 · #28 16-5 · #34 |
— | — | UGA -2.2 | — | 83.3 | — | 59% UGA | › | |
| Half final | 17-3 · #20 9-11 · #95 |
— | — | UVA -6.8 | — | 67.8 | — | 77% UVA | › | |
| Half final | 21-0 · #5 11-10 · #60 |
— | — | ARIZ -9.2 | — | 76.5 | — | 84% ARIZ | › | |
| Half final | 16-4 · #44 11-10 · #94 |
— | — | UNC -6.4 | — | 71.7 | — | 76% UNC | › | |
| Half final | 15-5 · #55 14-6 · #14 |
— | — | LOU -4.8 | — | 76.7 | — | 70% LOU | › | |
| Half final | 11-9 · #211 7-13 · #216 |
— | — | COLG -1.6 | — | 70.5 | — | 57% COLG | › | |
| Half final | 5-16 · #310 11-9 · #153 |
— | — | AMER -4.0 | — | 67.2 | — | 67% AMER | › | |
| Half final | 8-10 · #100 12-8 · #101 |
— | — | GW -7.4 | — | 69.5 | — | 79% GW | › | |
| Half final | 14-6 · #33 15-6 · #41 |
— | — | WIS -1.2 | — | 76.4 | — | 55% WIS | › | |
| Half final | 7-14 · #261 6-16 · #299 |
— | — | BU -0.1 | — | 67.2 | — | 50% BUCK | › | |
| Half final | 9-11 · #246 8-12 · #183 |
— | — | PRES -0.9 | — | 69.8 | — | 54% PRES | › | |
| Half final | 9-11 · #331 1-19 · #362 |
— | — | MERC -2.3 | — | 63.1 | — | 60% MERC | › | |
| Half final | 9-11 · #128 12-7 · #237 |
— | — | BUF -0.8 | — | 74.0 | — | 53% BUF | › | |
| Half final | 13-8 · #324 9-9 · #337 |
— | — | LIU -0.9 | — | 67.6 | — | 54% LIU | › | |
| Half final | 4-17 · #323 5-14 · #307 |
— | — | UML -2.7 | — | 63.5 | — | 61% UML | › | |
| Half final | 13-8 · #117 6-14 · #229 |
— | — | COFC -1.7 | — | 75.1 | — | 57% COFC | › | |
| Half final | 7-11 · #275 10-11 · #262 |
— | — | DREX -3.2 | — | 65.8 | — | 63% DREX | › | |
| Half final | 8-12 · #159 10-11 · #165 |
— | — | TOW -4.1 | — | 61.3 | — | 67% TOW | › | |
| Half final | 11-9 · #166 10-11 · #155 |
— | — | HOF -0.7 | — | 66.0 | — | 53% HOF | › | |
| Half final | 3-16 · #320 11-8 · #242 |
— | — | MER -10.5 | — | 72.6 | — | 87% MER | › | |
| Half final | 6-15 · #234 10-11 · #103 |
— | — | TXST -0.4 | — | 68.5 | — | 52% TXST | › | |
| Half final | 11-9 · #11 11-10 · #31 |
— | — | TEX -1.8 | — | 75.7 | — | 58% TEX | › | |
| Half final | 11-10 · #175 6-13 · #295 |
— | — | QUC -1.6 | — | 78.3 | — | 57% QUC | › | |
| Half final | 4-13 · #292 6-14 · #303 |
— | — | UNA -0.2 | — | 69.6 | — | 51% UNA | › | |
| Half final | 12-8 · #214 3-17 · #333 |
— | — | LIP -5.7 | — | 78.8 | — | 73% LIP | › | |
| Half final | 11-8 · #114 6-14 · #124 |
— | — | JOES -1.0 | — | 66.4 | — | 54% JOES | › | |
| Half final | 16-4 · #90 9-11 · #218 |
— | — | HPU -5.7 | — | 75.8 | — | 73% HPU | › | |
| Half final | 8-11 · #174 3-17 · #220 |
— | — | FRES -5.4 | — | 63.3 | — | 72% FRES | › | |
| Half final | 2-18 · #305 7-12 · #201 |
— | — | SDST -6.9 | — | 70.6 | — | 77% SDST | › | |
| Half final | 12-8 · #231 11-9 · #171 |
— | — | ARST -2.6 | — | 77.0 | — | 61% ARST | › | |
| Half final | 10-11 · #158 9-12 · #224 |
— | — | USM -0.5 | — | 69.5 | — | 52% USM | › | |
| Half final | 7-11 · #344 8-11 · #313 |
— | — | WEB -1.4 | — | 71.8 | — | 56% WEB | › | |
| Half final | 7-13 · #266 7-13 · #223 |
— | — | FGCU -0.2 | — | 68.0 | — | 51% FGCU | › | |
| Half final | 15-6 · #203 12-6 · #257 |
— | — | CBU -0.0 | — | 63.0 | — | 50% UTA | › | |
| Half final | 8-9 · #198 9-9 · #250 |
— | — | MOST -1.3 | — | 63.9 | — | 56% MOST | › | |
| Half final | 5-13 · #334 18-0 · #125 |
— | — | M-OH -9.4 | — | 74.1 | — | 85% M-OH | › | |
| Half final | 8-11 · #202 5-14 · #302 |
— | — | BCU -1.2 | — | 72.8 | — | 55% BCU | › | |
| Half final | 11-10 · #53 14-7 · #54 |
— | — | MIZ -2.9 | — | 72.5 | — | 63% MIZ | › | |
| Half final | 10-9 · #258 9-10 · #350 |
— | — | LIN -1.1 | — | 71.3 | — | 55% LIN | › | |
| Half final | 3-16 · #255 12-9 · #131 |
— | — | UNI -7.0 | — | 59.4 | — | 78% UNI | › | |
| Half final | 6-13 · #319 8-9 · #197 |
— | — | HOW -2.2 | — | 67.5 | — | 60% HOW | › | |
| Half final | 10-9 · #29 14-7 · #47 |
— | — | BAY -0.0 | — | 68.0 | — | 50% WVU | › | |
| Half final | 5-13 · #363 0-20 · #366 |
— | — | UAPB -5.1 | — | 71.0 | — | 71% UAPB | › | |
| Half final | 6-10 · #338 6-14 · #280 |
— | — | GRAM -1.4 | — | 69.5 | — | 56% GRAM | › | |
| Half final | 14-6 · #92 17-4 · #25 |
— | — | MIA -5.0 | — | 70.3 | — | 71% MIA | › | |
| Half final | 6-14 · #314 14-6 · #199 |
— | — | NAVY -6.4 | — | 67.7 | — | 76% NAVY | › | |
| Half final | 7-12 · #279 7-13 · #263 |
— | — | DEN -0.3 | — | 75.1 | — | 51% DEN | › | |
| Half final | 6-12 · #286 4-15 · #290 |
— | — | BRY -1.4 | — | 63.9 | — | 56% BRY | › | |
| Half final | 13-5 · #140 6-14 · #297 |
— | — | HAW -5.3 | — | 68.4 | — | 72% HAW | › | |
| Half final | 12-9 · #296 6-16 · #221 |
— | — | GASO -1.4 | — | 68.6 | — | 56% GASO | › | |
| Half final | 4-16 · #254 9-10 · #219 |
— | — | UNCO -3.0 | — | 76.9 | — | 63% UNCO | › | |
| Half final | 4-15 · #267 7-10 · #253 |
— | — | ACU -3.1 | — | 68.3 | — | 63% ACU | › | |
| Half final | 9-10 · #129 8-9 · #154 |
— | — | MTSU -1.6 | — | 68.9 | — | 57% MTSU | › | |
| Half final | 7-12 · #222 4-14 · #282 |
— | — | TNTC -0.0 | — | 66.9 | — | 50% TNTC | › | |
| Half final | 17-3 · #24 15-5 · #16 |
— | — | KU -0.2 | — | 73.0 | — | 51% KU | › | |
| Half final | 11-8 · #115 12-9 · #104 |
— | — | RICH -1.8 | — | 66.7 | — | 58% RICH | › | |
| Half final | 5-13 · #345 2-19 · #352 |
— | — | MORG -1.3 | — | 72.7 | — | 56% MORG | › | |
| Half final | 6-13 · #300 7-10 · #238 |
— | — | AMCC -4.8 | — | 63.1 | — | 70% AMCC | › | |
| Half final | 9-12 · #316 12-8 · #186 |
— | — | UVM -6.5 | — | 66.3 | — | 76% UVM | › | |
| Half final | 12-9 · #259 13-7 · #147 |
— | — | TROY -4.6 | — | 67.3 | — | 69% TROY | › | |
| Half final | 5-15 · #294 9-10 · #240 |
— | — | CARK -3.2 | — | 73.2 | — | 64% CARK | › | |
| Half final | 12-6 · #210 8-11 · #298 |
— | — | APSU -3.5 | — | 70.0 | — | 65% APSU | › | |
| Half final | 13-5 · #341 1-18 · #365 |
— | — | UTM -5.1 | — | 63.7 | — | 71% UTM | › | |
| Half final | 9-10 · #306 6-13 · #361 |
— | — | SEMO -1.9 | — | 65.9 | — | 58% SEMO | › | |
| Half final | 5-12 · #309 3-16 · #360 |
— | — | SOU -3.3 | — | 71.4 | — | 64% SOU | › | |
| Half final | 6-13 · #364 2-14 · #351 |
— | — | UMES -0.7 | — | 60.0 | — | 53% UMES | › | |
| Half final | 14-7 · #38 15-6 · #26 |
— | — | UCLA -0.9 | — | 68.3 | — | 54% UCLA | › | |
| Half final | 10-9 · #182 6-14 · #329 |
— | — | UCD -3.1 | — | 72.0 | — | 63% UCD | › | |
| Half final | 8-11 · #287 6-12 · #289 |
— | — | UIW -0.1 | — | 66.6 | — | 50% UIW | › | |
| Half final | 10-9 · #162 10-6 · #274 |
— | — | PRST -1.4 | — | 66.9 | — | 56% PRST | › | |
| Half final | 9-11 · #268 7-10 · #185 |
— | — | TAR -2.6 | — | 72.7 | — | 61% TAR | › | |
| Half final | 7-10 · #133 10-8 · #148 |
— | — | KENN -1.6 | — | 74.9 | — | 57% KENN | › | |
| Half final | 4-13 · #322 4-13 · #343 |
— | — | TXSO -0.3 | — | 75.2 | — | 51% TXSO | › | |
| Half final | 6-10 · #327 8-9 · #328 |
— | — | AAMU -2.6 | — | 65.3 | — | 61% AAMU | › | |
| Half final | 11-9 · #46 18-3 · #22 |
— | — | VAN -7.3 | — | 72.1 | — | 78% VAN | › | |
| Half final | 13-8 · #167 10-10 · #144 |
— | — | DRKE -0.3 | — | 70.2 | — | 51% DRKE | › | |
| Half final | 8-13 · #169 9-13 · #139 |
— | — | WSU -4.6 | — | 72.1 | — | 69% WSU | › | |
| Half final | 11-12 · #99 8-13 · #146 |
— | — | USD -0.7 | — | 71.7 | — | 53% USD | › | |
| Half final | 11-10 · #71 12-9 · #63 |
— | — | SYR -2.1 | — | 69.0 | — | 59% SYR | › | |
| Half final | 7-10 · #251 5-12 · #156 |
— | — | BRWN -0.8 | — | 67.6 | — | 53% BRWN | › | |
| Half final | 6-14 · #135 12-6 · #170 |
— | — | COLU -4.4 | — | 68.2 | — | 68% COLU | › | |
| Half final | 15-5 · #213 9-11 · #291 |
— | — | NDSU -4.3 | — | 76.0 | — | 68% NDSU | › | |
| Half final | 8-12 · #188 12-9 · #209 |
— | — | MASS -2.8 | — | 70.5 | — | 62% MASS | › | |
| Half final | 8-10 · #137 8-9 · #179 |
— | — | COR -3.3 | — | 80.5 | — | 64% COR | › | |
| Half final | 5-15 · #252 16-3 · #193 |
— | — | SFA -5.8 | — | 63.5 | — | 73% SFA | › | |
| Half final | 4-14 · #318 8-13 · #276 |
— | — | NOLA -2.9 | — | 72.7 | — | 62% NOLA | › | |
| Half final | 7-13 · #285 6-13 · #342 |
— | — | NICH -0.4 | — | 68.7 | — | 52% NICH | › | |
| Half final | 14-6 · #45 9-11 · #73 |
— | — | OKST -1.5 | — | 78.8 | — | 56% OKST | › | |
| Half final | 14-7 · #85 9-12 · #81 |
— | — | FSU -1.4 | — | 72.7 | — | 56% FSU | › | |
| Half final | 18-2 · #93 12-8 · #142 |
— | — | GMU -2.1 | — | 67.6 | — | 59% GMU | › | |
| Half final | 14-7 · #19 16-5 · #18 |
— | — | ARK -1.9 | — | 76.6 | — | 58% ARK | › | |
| Half final | 10-10 · #110 8-12 · #195 |
— | — | SIU -1.9 | — | 69.0 | — | 58% SIU | › | |
| Half final | 9-12 · #62 14-6 · #36 |
— | — | USC -6.3 | — | 72.3 | — | 75% USC | › | |
| Half final | 10-8 · #200 4-15 · #270 |
— | — | BGSU -4.1 | — | 69.7 | — | 67% BGSU | › | |
| Half final | 10-9 · #136 14-3 · #126 |
— | — | YALE -6.6 | — | 67.6 | — | 76% YALE | › | |
| Half final | 6-12 · #355 4-14 · #88 |
— | — | NHVN -1.2 | — | 63.5 | — | 55% NHVN | › | |
| Half final | 10-8 · #264 4-15 · #301 |
— | — | UMBC -0.5 | — | 68.5 | — | 52% UMBC | › | |
| Half final | 15-4 · #127 9-10 · #293 |
— | — | MCN -5.5 | — | 66.7 | — | 72% MCN | › | |
| Half final | 20-1 · #6 12-9 · #37 |
— | — | CONN -4.2 | — | 68.0 | — | 68% CONN | › | |
| Half final | 16-6 · #132 18-3 · #138 |
— | — | BEL -1.9 | — | 77.2 | — | 58% BEL | › | |
| Half final | 12-8 · #102 10-9 · #112 |
— | — | UAB -0.6 | — | 66.6 | — | 53% UAB | › | |
| Half final | 11-10 · #56 10-11 · #59 |
— | — | NU -0.2 | — | 70.5 | — | 51% NU | › | |
| Half final | 6-14 · #164 6-14 · #281 |
— | — | UCR -1.0 | — | 76.2 | — | 54% UCR | › | |
| Half final | 13-7 · #123 10-10 · #194 |
— | — | UCSD -2.1 | — | 73.6 | — | 59% UCSD | › | |
| Half final | 7-13 · #208 13-6 · #228 |
— | — | USA -3.8 | — | 66.0 | — | 66% USA | › | |
| Half final | 9-9 · #247 5-14 · #321 |
— | — | IDHO -2.4 | — | 67.5 | — | 60% IDHO | › | |
| Half final | 13-7 · #84 12-8 · #111 |
— | — | USF -4.2 | — | 75.9 | — | 68% USF | › | |
| Half final | 10-9 · #256 3-16 · #304 |
— | — | SIUE -0.5 | — | 62.2 | — | 52% SIUE | › | |
| Half final | 14-7 · #21 14-6 · #7 |
— | — | TENN -1.2 | — | 73.0 | — | 55% TENN | › | |
| Half final | 17-5 · #106 10-12 · #121 |
— | — | SCU -5.7 | — | 70.1 | — | 73% SCU | › | |
| Half final | 8-12 · #312 12-7 · #134 |
— | — | UCSB -4.1 | — | 73.2 | — | 67% UCSB | › | |
| Half final | 6-13 · #206 4-14 · #190 |
— | — | UTEP -2.4 | — | 62.6 | — | 60% UTEP | › | |
| Half final | 11-9 · #87 11-9 · #122 |
— | — | WYO -0.8 | — | 67.0 | — | 53% WYO | › | |
| Half final | 16-4 · #82 5-15 · #143 |
— | — | UNM -8.1 | — | 69.0 | — | 81% UNM | › | |
| Half final | 13-8 · #163 12-10 · #161 |
— | — | SF -2.9 | — | 65.6 | — | 62% SF | › | |
| Half final | 10-8 · #273 4-13 · #196 |
— | — | MONT -2.1 | — | 73.7 | — | 59% MONT | › | |
| Half final | 9-8 · #244 11-7 · #189 |
— | — | SHSU -4.4 | — | 66.1 | — | 69% SHSU | › | |
| Half final | 18-3 · #97 21-1 · #17 |
— | — | GONZ -7.2 | — | 69.7 | — | 78% GONZ | › |
The model’s 1st half is fitted from its full-game numbers and past halves; ESPN posts no 1st-half lines for college games. The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record