No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.8
Projected
29–40
✓ SOU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.3
Projected
36–36
✗ LEH lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.2
Projected
35–35
✓ CIN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.5
Projected
35–42
✓ SJU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 62.9
Projected
32–31
✗ UNI lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.3
Projected
32–33
✗ LAF lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.2
Projected
31–33
✗ FOR lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.8
Projected
36–38
✓ DUQ won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.8
Projected
30–35
✗ GMU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.4
Projected
33–34
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.3
Projected
33–35
✓ TEM won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.0
Projected
33–38
✗ IOWA lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.0
Projected
31–37
✓ COLG won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.5
Projected
36–37
✓ FSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.8
Projected
36–34
✗ AMER lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.5
Projected
35–33
✗ NAVY lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.0
Projected
39–38
✓ OAK won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 78.8
Projected
37–42
✓ RMU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.4
Projected
35–40
✗ LSU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.2
Projected
38–38
✓ UGA won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.9
Projected
37–40
✗ AUB lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.3
Projected
36–39
✓ BELL won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.2
Projected
36–39
✓ QUC won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.8
Projected
36–35
✓ APSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.2
Projected
33–36
✓ FIU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.8
Projected
37–39
✓ KENN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.0
Projected
30–36
✗ DRKE lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.1
Projected
32–35
✗ HALL lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.0
Projected
36–33
✓ BEL won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.5
Projected
31–36
✓ TLSA won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.0
Projected
41–33
✓ UAB won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.7
Projected
38–36
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.2
Projected
36–35
✓ SDST won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.0
Projected
36–34
✗ MRSH lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.3
Projected
36–41
✗ ARST lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.2
Projected
36–35
✓ SHSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.2
Projected
33–34
✓ GTWN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.9
Projected
40–32
✓ FLA won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.1
Projected
32–39
✓ USU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.0
Projected
37–37
✗ MUR lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.4
Projected
35–35
✗ USD lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.2
Projected
40–35
✓ USF won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.8
Projected
32–38
✗ WIS lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.9
Projected
33–38
✗ MIA lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.8
Projected
29–37
✗ NMSU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 60.4
Projected
30–30
✗ UTEP lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.9
Projected
35–30
✓ HOU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.2
Projected
33–34
✓ WSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.9
Projected
32–37
✓ PAC won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.3
Projected
32–35
✗ LMU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.8
Projected
32–36
✓ SDSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.0
Projected
33–38
✓ SCU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.0
Projected
34–33
✓ UCLA won
| Status | Matchup | Spread | Total | Model line | Spread edge | Model total | Total edge | Win prob | Model | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Half final | 0-19 · #366 4-12 · #309 |
— | — | SOU -11.9 | — | 68.8 | — | 90% SOU | › | |
| Half final | 7-12 · #216 6-13 · #288 |
— | — | LEH -0.4 | — | 72.3 | — | 52% LEH | › | |
| Half final | 10-8 · #29 10-10 · #30 |
— | — | CIN -0.6 | — | 70.2 | — | 53% CIN | › | |
| Half final | 13-7 · #72 15-5 · #9 |
— | — | SJU -7.3 | — | 76.5 | — | 79% SJU | › | |
| Half final | 12-8 · #131 7-12 · #195 |
— | — | UNI -0.0 | — | 62.9 | — | 50% SIU | › | |
| Half final | 6-15 · #299 4-16 · #310 |
— | — | LAF -1.5 | — | 65.3 | — | 56% LAF | › | |
| Half final | 6-13 · #124 7-10 · #100 |
— | — | FOR -2.3 | — | 63.2 | — | 60% FOR | › | |
| Half final | 11-8 · #142 9-9 · #107 |
— | — | DUQ -2.7 | — | 73.8 | — | 62% DUQ | › | |
| Half final | 11-7 · #115 17-2 · #93 |
— | — | GMU -4.9 | — | 64.8 | — | 70% GMU | › | |
| Half final | 6-12 · #177 5-14 · #145 |
— | — | ECU -1.2 | — | 67.4 | — | 55% ECU | › | |
| Half final | 10-9 · #141 12-7 · #111 |
— | — | TEM -2.5 | — | 68.3 | — | 61% TEM | › | |
| Half final | 14-5 · #36 14-5 · #43 |
— | — | IOWA -4.5 | — | 71.0 | — | 69% IOWA | › | |
| Half final | 6-13 · #317 10-9 · #211 |
— | — | COLG -6.0 | — | 68.0 | — | 74% COLG | › | |
| Half final | 14-5 · #92 8-12 · #81 |
— | — | FSU -0.6 | — | 73.5 | — | 53% FSU | › | |
| Half final | 11-8 · #153 5-14 · #314 |
— | — | AMER -2.4 | — | 69.8 | — | 60% AMER | › | |
| Half final | 13-6 · #199 7-13 · #261 |
— | — | NAVY -1.4 | — | 67.5 | — | 56% NAVY | › | |
| Half final | 11-10 · #204 10-8 · #249 |
— | — | OAK -1.2 | — | 77.0 | — | 55% OAK | › | |
| Half final | 4-16 · #340 11-9 · #168 |
— | — | RMU -5.2 | — | 78.8 | — | 71% RMU | › | |
| Half final | 10-10 · #53 13-7 · #51 |
— | — | LSU -5.0 | — | 74.4 | — | 71% LSU | › | |
| Half final | 13-6 · #7 16-4 · #34 |
— | — | UGA -0.6 | — | 76.2 | — | 53% UGA | › | |
| Half final | 11-8 · #11 13-7 · #21 |
— | — | AUB -3.3 | — | 76.9 | — | 64% AUB | › | |
| Half final | 8-10 · #298 5-13 · #295 |
— | — | BELL -2.8 | — | 74.3 | — | 62% BELL | › | |
| Half final | 8-10 · #240 11-9 · #175 |
— | — | QUC -2.9 | — | 75.2 | — | 62% QUC | › | |
| Half final | 11-6 · #210 5-14 · #294 |
— | — | APSU -1.5 | — | 70.8 | — | 56% APSU | › | |
| Half final | 7-9 · #198 7-10 · #178 |
— | — | FIU -2.3 | — | 69.2 | — | 60% FIU | › | |
| Half final | 9-9 · #129 9-8 · #148 |
— | — | KENN -2.0 | — | 76.8 | — | 59% KENN | › | |
| Half final | 3-15 · #255 9-10 · #144 |
— | — | DRKE -5.6 | — | 66.0 | — | 73% DRKE | › | |
| Half final | 11-9 · #49 14-6 · #67 |
— | — | HALL -3.1 | — | 67.1 | — | 63% HALL | › | |
| Half final | 17-3 · #138 9-10 · #176 |
— | — | BEL -3.1 | — | 69.0 | — | 63% BEL | › | |
| Half final | 10-8 · #112 15-3 · #108 |
— | — | TLSA -5.1 | — | 66.5 | — | 71% TLSA | › | |
| Half final | 11-8 · #102 2-16 · #192 |
— | — | UAB -7.9 | — | 73.0 | — | 80% UAB | › | |
| Half final | 6-13 · #263 1-17 · #335 |
— | — | DEN -1.9 | — | 74.7 | — | 58% DEN | › | |
| Half final | 7-11 · #201 6-12 · #279 |
— | — | SDST -1.5 | — | 71.2 | — | 57% SDST | › | |
| Half final | 12-7 · #231 9-11 · #103 |
— | — | MRSH -1.2 | — | 70.0 | — | 55% MRSH | › | |
| Half final | 5-15 · #234 11-8 · #171 |
— | — | ARST -5.0 | — | 76.3 | — | 71% ARST | › | |
| Half final | 10-7 · #189 9-8 · #250 |
— | — | SHSU -0.9 | — | 70.2 | — | 54% SHSU | › | |
| Half final | 12-8 · #66 10-10 · #64 |
— | — | GTWN -1.3 | — | 67.2 | — | 56% GTWN | › | |
| Half final | 14-6 · #1 11-9 · #79 |
— | — | FLA -8.4 | — | 71.9 | — | 82% FLA | › | |
| Half final | 11-8 · #122 15-3 · #58 |
— | — | USU -7.1 | — | 71.1 | — | 78% USU | › | |
| Half final | 13-7 · #116 16-5 · #132 |
— | — | MUR -0.6 | — | 74.0 | — | 53% MUR | › | |
| Half final | 7-13 · #146 4-16 · #172 |
— | — | USD -0.3 | — | 70.4 | — | 52% USD | › | |
| Half final | 12-7 · #84 11-8 · #130 |
— | — | USF -4.7 | — | 75.2 | — | 70% USF | › | |
| Half final | 10-10 · #70 14-6 · #41 |
— | — | WIS -5.1 | — | 69.8 | — | 71% WIS | › | |
| Half final | 14-6 · #85 16-4 · #25 |
— | — | MIA -5.5 | — | 70.9 | — | 73% MIA | › | |
| Half final | 5-13 · #206 7-9 · #133 |
— | — | NMSU -7.2 | — | 65.8 | — | 78% NMSU | › | |
| Half final | 8-8 · #244 4-13 · #190 |
— | — | UTEP -0.1 | — | 60.4 | — | 51% UTEP | › | |
| Half final | 17-2 · #2 13-7 · #40 |
— | — | HOU -5.0 | — | 64.9 | — | 71% HOU | › | |
| Half final | 12-8 · #119 8-13 · #139 |
— | — | WSU -1.2 | — | 67.2 | — | 55% WSU | › | |
| Half final | 8-12 · #169 12-8 · #163 |
— | — | PAC -4.1 | — | 68.9 | — | 67% PAC | › | |
| Half final | 10-12 · #99 10-11 · #121 |
— | — | LMU -2.8 | — | 66.3 | — | 62% LMU | › | |
| Half final | 11-8 · #87 13-5 · #75 |
— | — | SDSU -4.5 | — | 67.8 | — | 69% SDSU | › | |
| Half final | 12-9 · #161 16-5 · #106 |
— | — | SCU -5.4 | — | 71.0 | — | 72% SCU | › | |
| Half final | 14-6 · #26 8-12 · #57 |
— | — | UCLA -1.8 | — | 67.0 | — | 58% UCLA | › |
The model’s 1st half is fitted from its full-game numbers and past halves; ESPN posts no 1st-half lines for college games. The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record