No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.3
Projected
35–36
✗ PV lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.4
Projected
37–37
✓ TXSO won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.1
Projected
30–37
✓ SFA won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.4
Projected
36–38
✗ NICH lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.3
Projected
35–35
✓ WAKE won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.1
Projected
37–28
✗ MSU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.5
Projected
33–40
✗ MICH lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 78.7
Projected
41–38
✗ ARK lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.0
Projected
36–32
✗ UVA lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.3
Projected
31–35
✓ LAM won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.7
Projected
33–40
✓ VCU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.5
Projected
31–35
✓ DAY won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.3
Projected
37–40
✗ UCF lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.0
Projected
33–39
✓ NCSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 79.5
Projected
36–43
✗ AKR lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 79.0
Projected
38–41
✓ KENT won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.2
Projected
35–32
✗ EMU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.3
Projected
33–38
✗ BGSU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.6
Projected
36–30
✓ MCN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.0
Projected
34–42
✓ CONN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.3
Projected
37–41
✗ SLU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 79.8
Projected
37–43
✓ ALA won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.5
Projected
34–37
✓ UIC won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.8
Projected
34–39
✓ VT won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.1
Projected
34–33
✓ UIW won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.1
Projected
36–35
✗ WMU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.1
Projected
33–36
✓ WVU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.2
Projected
38–34
✗ PUR lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.1
Projected
37–39
✓ VAN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.9
Projected
37–41
✗ M-OH lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.4
Projected
35–33
✓ JOES won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.7
Projected
37–35
✗ CREI lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.8
Projected
37–31
✓ BOIS won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.1
Projected
33–34
✓ NEV won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.5
Projected
38–35
✓ UNM won
| Status | Matchup | Spread | Total | Model line | Spread edge | Model total | Total edge | Win prob | Model | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Half final | 7-9 · #328 4-12 · #343 |
— | — | PV -0.5 | — | 71.3 | — | 52% PV | › | |
| Half final | 5-13 · #302 3-13 · #322 |
— | — | TXSO -0.3 | — | 73.4 | — | 51% TXSO | › | |
| Half final | 4-13 · #318 15-3 · #193 |
— | — | SFA -7.6 | — | 67.1 | — | 80% SFA | › | |
| Half final | 7-13 · #276 7-12 · #285 |
— | — | NICH -1.6 | — | 74.4 | — | 57% NICH | › | |
| Half final | 11-9 · #89 8-12 · #74 |
— | — | WAKE -0.3 | — | 69.3 | — | 51% WAKE | › | |
| Half final | 18-2 · #10 9-11 · #62 |
— | — | MSU -9.1 | — | 65.1 | — | 84% MSU | › | |
| Half final | 20-0 · #27 18-1 · #8 |
— | — | MICH -7.5 | — | 72.5 | — | 79% MICH | › | |
| Half final | 15-5 · #18 11-9 · #31 |
— | — | ARK -3.0 | — | 78.7 | — | 63% ARK | › | |
| Half final | 16-3 · #20 11-9 · #71 |
— | — | UVA -4.0 | — | 68.0 | — | 67% UVA | › | |
| Half final | 6-12 · #342 8-10 · #293 |
— | — | LAM -4.2 | — | 65.3 | — | 68% LAM | › | |
| Half final | 12-8 · #104 14-6 · #61 |
— | — | VCU -6.6 | — | 72.7 | — | 76% VCU | › | |
| Half final | 12-8 · #105 14-6 · #91 |
— | — | DAY -3.7 | — | 65.5 | — | 66% DAY | › | |
| Half final | 11-9 · #60 15-4 · #39 |
— | — | UCF -3.3 | — | 77.3 | — | 64% UCF | › | |
| Half final | 12-8 · #63 14-6 · #48 |
— | — | NCSU -5.5 | — | 72.0 | — | 72% NCSU | › | |
| Half final | 9-9 · #157 14-4 · #118 |
— | — | AKR -6.7 | — | 79.5 | — | 77% AKR | › | |
| Half final | 9-10 · #128 13-5 · #151 |
— | — | KENT -2.8 | — | 79.0 | — | 62% KENT | › | |
| Half final | 8-11 · #188 3-15 · #270 |
— | — | EMU -2.8 | — | 66.2 | — | 62% EMU | › | |
| Half final | 11-7 · #237 10-7 · #200 |
— | — | BGSU -4.8 | — | 71.3 | — | 70% BGSU | › | |
| Half final | 14-4 · #127 5-14 · #252 |
— | — | MCN -6.5 | — | 65.6 | — | 76% MCN | › | |
| Half final | 9-11 · #52 19-1 · #6 |
— | — | CONN -8.1 | — | 76.0 | — | 81% CONN | › | |
| Half final | 12-7 · #101 18-1 · #69 |
— | — | SLU -4.3 | — | 77.3 | — | 68% SLU | › | |
| Half final | 14-6 · #54 13-6 · #15 |
— | — | ALA -6.6 | — | 79.8 | — | 76% ALA | › | |
| Half final | 7-12 · #207 9-10 · #110 |
— | — | UIC -3.3 | — | 71.5 | — | 64% UIC | › | |
| Half final | 11-9 · #94 15-6 · #68 |
— | — | VT -5.2 | — | 72.8 | — | 71% VT | › | |
| Half final | 6-11 · #289 5-13 · #300 |
— | — | UIW -0.9 | — | 66.1 | — | 54% UIW | › | |
| Half final | 7-11 · #187 4-13 · #334 |
— | — | WMU -1.1 | — | 70.1 | — | 55% WMU | › | |
| Half final | 10-10 · #83 13-7 · #47 |
— | — | WVU -3.3 | — | 69.1 | — | 64% WVU | › | |
| Half final | 17-3 · #23 13-7 · #38 |
— | — | PUR -3.8 | — | 71.2 | — | 66% PUR | › | |
| Half final | 14-6 · #19 17-3 · #22 |
— | — | VAN -1.9 | — | 76.1 | — | 58% VAN | › | |
| Half final | 12-8 · #209 17-0 · #125 |
— | — | M-OH -4.8 | — | 77.9 | — | 70% M-OH | › | |
| Half final | 10-8 · #114 5-16 · #113 |
— | — | JOES -2.4 | — | 68.4 | — | 60% JOES | › | |
| Half final | 12-8 · #37 7-14 · #42 |
— | — | CREI -1.9 | — | 72.7 | — | 58% CREI | › | |
| Half final | 11-7 · #86 5-14 · #143 |
— | — | BOIS -6.5 | — | 67.8 | — | 76% BOIS | › | |
| Half final | 13-6 · #80 14-6 · #96 |
— | — | NEV -1.5 | — | 67.1 | — | 56% NEV | › | |
| Half final | 15-4 · #82 9-9 · #98 |
— | — | UNM -3.1 | — | 73.5 | — | 63% UNM | › |
The model’s 1st half is fitted from its full-game numbers and past halves; ESPN posts no 1st-half lines for college games. The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record