LJVM Coliseum · at Wake Forest · Conference game
Closing line
CLEM -4.5✓ WAKE covered by 12.5
Closing total140.5Over by 21.5
| This season | WAKE | |
|---|---|---|
| 20-6 | Record | 13-12 |
| 15-11 | ATS | 10-15 |
| 10-16 | O/U | 15-10 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: CLEM 73–71 WAKE · ✗ CLEM (57%) lost
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CLEM | 32 | 45 | 77 |
| WAKE | 45 | 40 | 85 |
1st half: CLEM 32, WAKE 45 (WAKE by 13). The model had CLEM by 1.4 and a total of 67.5 (actual 77).
Team stats
| CLEM | WAKE | |
|---|---|---|
| 26-56 46% | Field goals | 28-51 55% |
| 8-26 31% | 3-pointers | 10-22 45% |
| 17-25 68% | Free throws | 19-24 79% |
| 27 10 off | Rebounds | 27 6 off |
| 14 | Assists | 14 |
| 4 | Steals | 8 |
| 3 | Blocks | 4 |
| 9 | Turnovers | 10 |
| 21 | Fouls | 19 |
| 32 | Points in paint | 30 |
| 14 | Fast-break points | 7 |
Players
| CLEM | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jake Wahlin F | 30 | 17 | 5 | 0 | 7-11 | 3-7 |
| RJ Godfrey F | 27 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 3-5 | 0-0 |
| Carter Welling F | 26 | 13 | 7 | 1 | 4-9 | 0-1 |
| Dillon Hunter G | 22 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1-3 | 1-3 |
| Jestin Porter G | 22 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 3-7 | 1-5 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Butta Johnson G | 27 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 2-5 | 1-3 |
| Nick Davidson F | 21 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 2-7 | 1-4 |
| Ace Buckner G | 20 | 13 | 4 | 2 | 4-9 | 1-3 |
| Chase Thompson F | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Blake Davidson, Zac Foster, Trent Steinour, Dallas Thomas
| WAKE | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juke Harris G | 38 | 20 | 7 | 2 | 7-17 | 2-8 |
| Sebastian Akins G | 30 | 16 | 3 | 1 | 4-7 | 1-3 |
| Tre'Von Spillers F | 29 | 10 | 6 | 1 | 4-6 | 0-0 |
| Myles Colvin G | 28 | 14 | 5 | 2 | 5-9 | 4-6 |
| Cooper Schwieger F | 14 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1-3 | 0-1 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Marqus Marion F | 19 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Omaha Biliew F | 16 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 3-3 | 1-1 |
| Mekhi Mason G | 15 | 13 | 1 | 1 | 4-5 | 2-3 |
| Isaac Carr G | 11 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Dimitrije Kovacevic, Anson Beard Jr., Jaylen Cross, Will Underwood, Vincent Ricchiuti, Nate Calmese, Owen Kmety
Loading the game…
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edgeResult
Spread
MarketCLEM -4.5
ModelCLEM -2.1
Model edgeWAKE +2.4
W WAKE covered
Total
Market140.5
Model144.2
Model edgeOver 3.7
W Over
Projected score
CLEM 73.1 · WAKE 71
CLEM 77 · WAKE 85
Win probability
CLEM 57%
1st half
Spread
CLEM -1.4
WAKE -13.0
Total
67.5
77 points
Projected score
CLEM 34.4 · WAKE 33.1
CLEM 32 · WAKE 45
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenCLEM -2.5
2 → CLEM
CloseCLEM -4.5
2 pts toward CLEM
Total
Open138.5
▲ 2
Close140.5
Up 2 since the open
Moneyline
CLEM -218 · WAKE +180
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened CLEM -2.5 · closed CLEM -4.5 · moved 2 toward CLEMmodel CLEM -2
model CLEM -2
Opened 138.5 · closed 140.5 · moved 2 upmodel 144
model 144
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7-3 70% | 6-4 60% | 3-7 30% | |
| 3-7 30% | 4-6 40% | 7-3 70% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
CLEM 3–2 WAKECLEM leads · 5 games since 2021-22 · CLEM 3-2 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 2024-25 | WAKE 62 @ CLEM 73 | CLEM -8.5 | CLEM W |
| Mar 9, 2023-24 | CLEM 76 @ WAKE 81 | WAKE -3.5 | WAKE W |
| Jan 17, 2022-23 | CLEM 77 @ WAKE 87 | WAKE -3.5 | WAKE W |
| Dec 2, 2022-23 | WAKE 57 @ CLEM 77 | CLEM -3.5 | CLEM W |
| Feb 23, 2021-22 | WAKE 69 @ CLEM 80 | CLEM +4 | CLEM W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Clemson
26 games played
Straight up
20-6
77% wins
Against the spread
15-11
58% covers · avg +1.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
10-16
38% overs · avg −3.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 88-38 | -29.5 | W +20.5 | 146.5 | U 126 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 97-59 | -29.5 | W +8.5 | 145.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 83-56 | -29.5 | L −2.5 | 151.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 74-79 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 142.5 | O 153 |
| Nov 17 | vs | W 81-61 | -25.5 | L −5.5 | 144.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 70-67 | -4.5 | L −1.5 | 132.5 | O 137 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 97-94 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 152.5 | O 191 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 92-56 | -27.5 | W +8.5 | 141.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 84-90 | +8.5 | W +2.5 | 165.5 | O 174 |
| Dec 9 | vs | L 64-67 | +4.5 | W +1.5 | 152.5 | U 131 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 70-63 | -22.5 | L −15.5 | 152.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 68-61 | -12.5 | L −5.5 | 142.5 | U 129 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 68-65 | -3.5 | L −0.5 | 140.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 31 | @ | W 64-61 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 140.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 73-68 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 135.5 | O 141 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 74-70 | -3.5 | W +0.5 | 149.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 76-61 | -3.5 | W +11.5 | 133.5 | O 137 |
| Jan 13 | vs | W 74-50 | -15.5 | W +8.5 | 136.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 69-59 | -4.5 | W +5.5 | 143.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 20 | vs | L 76-80 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 142.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 77-63 | -8.5 | W +5.5 | 142.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 63-52 | -10.5 | W +0.5 | 135.5 | U 115 |
| Feb 4 | @ | W 66-64 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 138.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 77-55 | -4.5 | W +17.5 | 139.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 66-76 | -8.5 | L −18.5 | 138.5 | O 142 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 54-67 | +12.5 | L −0.5 | 134.5 | U 121 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
UNH
W 88-38
+20.5
7
vs
GWEB
W 97-59
+8.5
11
vs
MORE
W 83-56
−2.5
15
@
GTWN
L 74-79
−6.5
17
vs
UNA
W 81-61
−5.5
21
vs
WVU
W 70-67
−1.5
23
vs
UGA
W 97-94
+1.5
28
vs
AAMU
W 92-56
+8.5
3
@
ALA
L 84-90
+2.5
9
vs
BYU
L 64-67
+1.5
13
vs
MER
W 70-63
−15.5
16
vs
SC
W 68-61
−5.5
21
vs
CIN
W 68-65
−0.5
31
@
SYR
W 64-61
+1.5
3
@
PITT
W 73-68
+1.5
7
vs
SMU
W 74-70
+0.5
10
@
ND
W 76-61
+11.5
13
vs
BC
W 74-50
+8.5
17
vs
MIA
W 69-59
+5.5
20
vs
NCSU
L 76-80
−6.5
24
@
GT
W 77-63
+5.5
31
vs
PITT
W 63-52
+0.5
4
@
STAN
W 66-64
−1.5
7
@
CAL
W 77-55
+17.5
11
vs
VT
L 66-76
−18.5
14
@
DUKE
L 54-67
−0.5
covered 15didn’t cover 11avg +1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
UNH
W 88-38
−20.5
7
vs
GWEB
W 97-59
+10.5
11
vs
MORE
W 83-56
−12.5
15
@
GTWN
L 74-79
+10.5
17
vs
UNA
W 81-61
−2.5
21
vs
WVU
W 70-67
+4.5
23
vs
UGA
W 97-94
+38.5
28
vs
AAMU
W 92-56
+6.5
3
@
ALA
L 84-90
+8.5
9
vs
BYU
L 64-67
−21.5
13
vs
MER
W 70-63
−19.5
16
vs
SC
W 68-61
−13.5
21
vs
CIN
W 68-65
−7.5
31
@
SYR
W 64-61
−15.5
3
@
PITT
W 73-68
+5.5
7
vs
SMU
W 74-70
−5.5
10
@
ND
W 76-61
+3.5
13
vs
BC
W 74-50
−12.5
17
vs
MIA
W 69-59
−15.5
20
vs
NCSU
L 76-80
+13.5
24
@
GT
W 77-63
−2.5
31
vs
PITT
W 63-52
−20.5
4
@
STAN
W 66-64
−8.5
7
@
CAL
W 77-55
−7.5
11
vs
VT
L 66-76
+3.5
14
@
DUKE
L 54-67
−13.5
over 10under 16avg −3.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Wake Forest
25 games played
Straight up
13-12
52% wins
Against the spread
10-15
40% covers · avg −0.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-10
60% overs · avg −0.9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 88-74 | -19.5 | L −5.5 | 139.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 81-65 | -22.5 | L −6.5 | 152.5 | U 146 |
| Nov 11 | vs | L 84-85 | +15.5 | W +14.5 | 168.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 16 | vs | W 109-75 | -30.5 | W +3.5 | 165.5 | O 184 |
| Nov 20 | vs | L 83-84 | +9.5 | W +8.5 | 160.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 69-68 | -2.5 | L −1.5 | 160.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 99-51 | -17.5 | W +30.5 | 159.5 | U 150 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 86-73 | -17.5 | L −4.5 | 154.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 2 | vs | L 68-86 | -4.5 | L −22.5 | 159.5 | U 154 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 75-66 | +2.5 | W +11.5 | 143.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 14 | vs | W 111-73 | -18.5 | W +19.5 | 165.5 | O 184 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 71-68 | -24.5 | L −21.5 | 163.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 21 | vs | L 67-98 | +5.5 | L −25.5 | 164.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 31 | @ | L 57-70 | +10.5 | L −2.5 | 159.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 81-78 | -5.5 | L −2.5 | 153.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 77-81 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 157.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 84-87 | +10.5 | W +7.5 | 154.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 69-68 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 168.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 20 | vs | L 79-91 | -1.5 | L −13.5 | 157.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 69-90 | +19.5 | L −1.5 | 153.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 27 | @ | L 76-80 | +1.5 | L −2.5 | 150.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 78-96 | +5.5 | L −12.5 | 156.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 80-88 | +9.5 | W +1.5 | 162.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 83-67 | -3.5 | W +12.5 | 158.5 | U 150 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 68-63 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 150.5 | U 131 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
AMER
W 88-74
−5.5
7
vs
MORE
W 81-65
−6.5
11
vs
MICH
L 84-85
+14.5
16
vs
UML
W 109-75
+3.5
20
vs
TTU
L 83-84
+8.5
21
vs
MEM
W 69-68
−1.5
25
vs
CAM
W 99-51
+30.5
28
vs
NE
W 86-73
−4.5
2
vs
OU
L 68-86
−22.5
6
vs
WVU
W 75-66
+11.5
14
vs
QUC
W 111-73
+19.5
17
vs
LONG
W 71-68
−21.5
21
vs
VAN
L 67-98
−25.5
31
@
NCSU
L 57-70
−2.5
3
vs
VT
W 81-78
−2.5
7
vs
MIA
L 77-81
−5.5
10
@
UNC
L 84-87
+7.5
17
@
FSU
W 69-68
−0.5
20
vs
SMU
L 79-91
−13.5
24
@
DUKE
L 69-90
−1.5
27
@
PITT
L 76-80
−2.5
31
vs
NCSU
L 78-96
−12.5
7
vs
LOU
L 80-88
+1.5
11
@
GT
W 83-67
+12.5
14
vs
STAN
W 68-63
+0.5
covered 10didn’t cover 15avg −0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
AMER
W 88-74
+22.5
7
vs
MORE
W 81-65
−6.5
11
vs
MICH
L 84-85
+0.5
16
vs
UML
W 109-75
+18.5
20
vs
TTU
L 83-84
+6.5
21
vs
MEM
W 69-68
−23.5
25
vs
CAM
W 99-51
−9.5
28
vs
NE
W 86-73
+4.5
2
vs
OU
L 68-86
−5.5
6
vs
WVU
W 75-66
−2.5
14
vs
QUC
W 111-73
+18.5
17
vs
LONG
W 71-68
−24.5
21
vs
VAN
L 67-98
+0.5
31
@
NCSU
L 57-70
−32.5
3
vs
VT
W 81-78
+5.5
7
vs
MIA
L 77-81
+0.5
10
@
UNC
L 84-87
+16.5
17
@
FSU
W 69-68
−31.5
20
vs
SMU
L 79-91
+12.5
24
@
DUKE
L 69-90
+5.5
27
@
PITT
L 76-80
+5.5
31
vs
NCSU
L 78-96
+17.5
7
vs
LOU
L 80-88
+5.5
11
@
GT
W 83-67
−8.5
14
vs
STAN
W 68-63
−19.5
over 15under 10avg −0.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Clemson
20-6 overall · 10-3 in conference · Atlantic Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Duke54–67
- Lvs Virginia Tech66–76
- W@ California77–55
- W@ Stanford66–64
- Wvs Pitt63–52
4 days since their last game.
Wake Forest
13-12 overall · 4-8 in conference · Atlantic Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs Stanford68–63
- W@ Georgia Tech83–67
- Lvs Louisville80–88
- Lvs NC State78–96
- L@ Pitt76–80
4 days since their last game.