No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.8
Projected
34–37
✗ PSU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.8
Projected
32–33
✓ HC won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.2
Projected
32–40
✓ WOF won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.4
Projected
36–37
✗ GTWN lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.4
Projected
34–40
✓ YSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.4
Projected
34–33
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.9
Projected
30–38
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 84.2
Projected
41–43
✗ ALA lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.7
Projected
34–31
✓ UNI won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.1
Projected
35–34
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.9
Projected
34–33
✓ AMER won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.0
Projected
34–35
✓ SBU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.4
Projected
30–35
✓ FOR won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.2
Projected
32–37
✓ DUQ won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.5
Projected
32–33
✗ GMU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.0
Projected
33–35
✓ DAV won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.5
Projected
36–32
✓ WICH won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.4
Projected
36–35
✓ UAB won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.5
Projected
34–33
✗ CLEM lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.8
Projected
35–37
✗ L-MD lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.7
Projected
31–37
✓ NAVY won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.8
Projected
34–38
✓ NKU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.3
Projected
36–39
✓ WCU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.0
Projected
34–34
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.7
Projected
34–40
✗ TA&M lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.5
Projected
33–39
✓ TENN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.2
Projected
36–39
✓ EKU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.5
Projected
32–35
✓ FGCU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.8
Projected
39–36
✗ QUC lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.5
Projected
35–32
✗ WKU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.7
Projected
35–35
✗ SIU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.7
Projected
42–33
✗ TROY lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.9
Projected
38–36
✓ LIP won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.3
Projected
35–37
✓ SHSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 60.6
Projected
30–31
✓ LT won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.8
Projected
35–33
✗ NCCU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.8
Projected
35–31
✓ UIC won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.6
Projected
41–33
✗ FAU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.7
Projected
33–39
✓ TLSA won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.2
Projected
32–36
✓ NU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 60.8
Projected
28–33
✓ HALL won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.9
Projected
33–38
✓ OMA won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.3
Projected
35–35
✓ NDSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.3
Projected
37–36
✓ KENN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.4
Projected
30–35
✗ WVU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.6
Projected
36–42
✓ ARIZ won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.1
Projected
39–35
✓ KU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.2
Projected
39–32
✓ UVA won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.2
Projected
40–33
✓ SJU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.0
Projected
39–36
✗ VAN lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.1
Projected
35–38
✓ ILST won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 61.9
Projected
34–28
✓ SMC won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.0
Projected
40–36
✗ AUB lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.3
Projected
34–35
✓ WSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.7
Projected
40–35
✓ ILL won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.3
Projected
33–37
✗ PORT lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.9
Projected
34–39
✓ USU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.6
Projected
41–31
✓ GONZ won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.3
Projected
35–35
✗ UNLV lost
| Status | Matchup | Spread | Total | Model line | Spread edge | Model total | Total edge | Win prob | Model | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Half final | 10-15 · #62 11-15 · #78 |
— | — | PSU -2.7 | — | 70.8 | — | 61% PSU | › | |
| Half final | 7-19 · #310 7-18 · #317 |
— | — | HC -1.0 | — | 64.8 | — | 54% HC | › | |
| Half final | 3-21 · #320 15-10 · #248 |
— | — | WOF -8.6 | — | 72.2 | — | 83% WOF | › | |
| Half final | 13-13 · #72 13-12 · #64 |
— | — | GTWN -0.6 | — | 72.4 | — | 52% GTWN | › | |
| Half final | 7-17 · #315 10-14 · #265 |
— | — | YSU -6.1 | — | 73.4 | — | 75% YSU | › | |
| Half final | 17-8 · #173 14-10 · #152 |
— | — | ETSU -0.6 | — | 67.4 | — | 53% ETSU | › | |
| Half final | 13-13 · #37 24-2 · #6 |
— | — | CONN -7.9 | — | 67.9 | — | 81% CONN | › | |
| Half final | 19-6 · #18 18-7 · #15 |
— | — | ALA -1.9 | — | 84.2 | — | 58% ALA | › | |
| Half final | 16-10 · #131 8-17 · #207 |
— | — | UNI -3.0 | — | 64.7 | — | 63% UNI | › | |
| Half final | 17-9 · #167 13-13 · #176 |
— | — | BRAD -1.1 | — | 68.1 | — | 55% BRAD | › | |
| Half final | 12-13 · #153 8-19 · #299 |
— | — | AMER -1.1 | — | 66.9 | — | 55% AMER | › | |
| Half final | 13-10 · #114 13-11 · #142 |
— | — | SBU -1.4 | — | 69.0 | — | 56% SBU | › | |
| Half final | 6-20 · #113 11-12 · #100 |
— | — | FOR -5.5 | — | 64.4 | — | 73% FOR | › | |
| Half final | 6-18 · #124 13-10 · #107 |
— | — | DUQ -5.3 | — | 69.2 | — | 72% DUQ | › | |
| Half final | 16-9 · #91 20-5 · #93 |
— | — | GMU -0.9 | — | 65.5 | — | 54% GMU | › | |
| Half final | 13-12 · #104 13-10 · #115 |
— | — | DAV -2.0 | — | 67.0 | — | 58% DAV | › | |
| Half final | 15-10 · #77 8-16 · #145 |
— | — | WICH -4.3 | — | 68.5 | — | 68% WICH | › | |
| Half final | 15-10 · #102 14-10 · #111 |
— | — | UAB -0.9 | — | 71.4 | — | 54% UAB | › | |
| Half final | 20-6 · #35 13-12 · #89 |
— | — | CLEM -1.4 | — | 67.5 | — | 56% CLEM | › | |
| Half final | 8-17 · #288 9-16 · #314 |
— | — | L-MD -2.8 | — | 71.8 | — | 62% L-MD | › | |
| Half final | 10-15 · #216 19-6 · #199 |
— | — | NAVY -5.9 | — | 67.7 | — | 74% NAVY | › | |
| Half final | 12-12 · #249 13-11 · #230 |
— | — | NKU -3.3 | — | 71.8 | — | 64% NKU | › | |
| Half final | 10-15 · #284 8-15 · #215 |
— | — | WCU -2.9 | — | 74.3 | — | 62% WCU | › | |
| Half final | 13-13 · #158 15-11 · #283 |
— | — | CCU -0.1 | — | 68.0 | — | 50% CCU | › | |
| Half final | 11-14 · #46 17-8 · #28 |
— | — | TA&M -5.3 | — | 73.7 | — | 72% TA&M | › | |
| Half final | 13-12 · #31 18-7 · #7 |
— | — | TENN -6.1 | — | 71.5 | — | 75% TENN | › | |
| Half final | 10-14 · #298 7-18 · #294 |
— | — | EKU -3.2 | — | 74.2 | — | 64% EKU | › | |
| Half final | 8-17 · #223 10-15 · #266 |
— | — | FGCU -3.3 | — | 66.5 | — | 64% FGCU | › | |
| Half final | 14-12 · #175 6-17 · #292 |
— | — | QUC -3.4 | — | 74.8 | — | 64% QUC | › | |
| Half final | 12-11 · #129 9-15 · #206 |
— | — | WKU -2.6 | — | 66.5 | — | 61% WKU | › | |
| Half final | 11-15 · #195 10-16 · #144 |
— | — | SIU -0.4 | — | 69.7 | — | 52% SIU | › | |
| Half final | 15-10 · #147 2-23 · #358 |
— | — | TROY -8.5 | — | 74.7 | — | 82% TROY | › | |
| Half final | 14-11 · #214 9-15 · #295 |
— | — | LIP -1.6 | — | 73.9 | — | 57% LIP | › | |
| Half final | 9-13 · #154 14-8 · #189 |
— | — | SHSU -2.2 | — | 72.3 | — | 59% SHSU | › | |
| Half final | 10-12 · #198 11-11 · #244 |
— | — | LT -1.2 | — | 60.6 | — | 55% LT | › | |
| Half final | 6-14 · #357 4-18 · #353 |
— | — | NCCU -1.2 | — | 67.8 | — | 55% NCCU | › | |
| Half final | 13-12 · #110 4-20 · #255 |
— | — | UIC -4.4 | — | 65.8 | — | 69% UIC | › | |
| Half final | 12-12 · #109 3-20 · #192 |
— | — | FAU -7.4 | — | 73.6 | — | 79% FAU | › | |
| Half final | 12-12 · #141 18-6 · #108 |
— | — | TLSA -6.7 | — | 71.7 | — | 77% TLSA | › | |
| Half final | 10-15 · #50 10-16 · #59 |
— | — | NU -4.2 | — | 68.2 | — | 68% NU | › | |
| Half final | 13-12 · #66 18-8 · #67 |
— | — | HALL -4.3 | — | 60.8 | — | 68% HALL | › | |
| Half final | 3-21 · #305 10-14 · #279 |
— | — | OMA -4.6 | — | 70.9 | — | 69% OMA | › | |
| Half final | 18-6 · #213 9-15 · #201 |
— | — | NDSU -0.4 | — | 70.3 | — | 52% NDSU | › | |
| Half final | 11-11 · #148 10-12 · #250 |
— | — | KENN -0.5 | — | 73.3 | — | 52% KENN | › | |
| Half final | 9-16 · #73 16-9 · #47 |
— | — | WVU -5.1 | — | 65.4 | — | 71% WVU | › | |
| Half final | 19-6 · #24 23-2 · #5 |
— | — | ARIZ -5.3 | — | 77.6 | — | 72% ARIZ | › | |
| Half final | 19-6 · #16 16-9 · #45 |
— | — | KU -3.9 | — | 74.1 | — | 66% KU | › | |
| Half final | 22-3 · #20 11-15 · #94 |
— | — | UVA -7.2 | — | 70.2 | — | 78% UVA | › | |
| Half final | 20-5 · #9 9-17 · #42 |
— | — | SJU -6.4 | — | 73.2 | — | 76% SJU | › | |
| Half final | 21-4 · #22 17-8 · #54 |
— | — | VAN -3.0 | — | 74.0 | — | 63% VAN | › | |
| Half final | 19-9 · #132 16-10 · #116 |
— | — | ILST -2.3 | — | 73.1 | — | 60% ILST | › | |
| Half final | 22-4 · #97 14-11 · #119 |
— | — | SMC -5.3 | — | 61.9 | — | 72% SMC | › | |
| Half final | 14-11 · #21 12-13 · #53 |
— | — | AUB -4.3 | — | 76.0 | — | 68% AUB | › | |
| Half final | 15-11 · #163 10-16 · #139 |
— | — | WSU -1.3 | — | 68.3 | — | 56% WSU | › | |
| Half final | 21-5 · #4 17-7 · #36 |
— | — | ILL -5.3 | — | 74.7 | — | 72% ILL | › | |
| Half final | 5-20 · #172 10-15 · #169 |
— | — | PORT -3.9 | — | 70.3 | — | 66% PORT | › | |
| Half final | 14-9 · #86 21-3 · #58 |
— | — | USU -4.5 | — | 72.9 | — | 69% USU | › | |
| Half final | 25-2 · #17 14-13 · #161 |
— | — | GONZ -9.3 | — | 71.6 | — | 84% GONZ | › | |
| Half final | 14-10 · #87 12-12 · #98 |
— | — | UNLV -0.1 | — | 70.3 | — | 51% UNLV | › |
The model’s 1st half is fitted from its full-game numbers and past halves; ESPN posts no 1st-half lines for college games. The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record